ITT frick you I liked it
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
ITT frick you I liked it
ITT frick you I liked it
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
It wasn't a terrible or particularly incompetent movie. It just had zero reason to exist.
fpbp
but the ending blew chunks
No movie needs a reason to exist. It was an enjoyable experience.
>No movie needs a reason to exist
Terrible rebuttal, anon. There were 3 movies prior to this. If it ended at three, nobody would've minded. Plus, your line of logic is how the
Simpsons is still running.
>There were 3 movies prior to this.
NTA but none of those NEEDED to exist. The first was perfectly fine on its own, and even that one didn't HAVE to get made. The idea that movies need a reason to exist is moronic, that would get rid of 99% of all movies and only leave you with shitty propaganda.
Saying the movie 'had no reason to exist" is a weird way to phrase the actual point, which is that we're tired of endless sequels instead of new stories. A lot of the new stories Disney and Pixar have been making have also been mid though, so the argument feels a bit weaker these days
Tell me where you live so I can come over and throw rocks at you.
fpbp
Toy Story 3 had a good ending for the series.
Toy Story 4 tried to pad it out even more by adding even more melodrama to the series with some moronic drama with Woody and Bonnie.
What it would've just happened had if Pixar wanted more Toy Story stuff is just literally do feature length movies in vein of Toy Story 3-era shorts which are just literally toys getting into all sorts of fun adventures with no moronic too-deep drama about the humans and what it means to be a toy.
TLDR: Frick off with the moronic too-deep bullshittery and human-related drama in TS series
>Toy Story 3 had a good ending for the series.
As did Toy Story. And Toy Story 2. None of them past the first were necessary for closure.
Every sequel--every movie period, really--justifies itself after the fact. I think what people mean is that Toy Story 4 didn't justify itself. It's true of course that you can always compartmentalize and ignore the stuff you don't like, but there's something to be said for the way a sequel sacrifices finality. Wouldn't Toy Story 3's ending feel more impactful if, even now a decade later, we still hadn't seen them again? That finality will never be there again, least of all for new viewers that watch the movies for the first time after Toy Story 4.
Hehe. I still like that one cam version of Toy Story 3 that was going around the pirate sites at the time that cut to the credits after all the toys were holding hands in the incinerator.
4 actually did provide possible happy endings for toys everywhere. 1, 2 and 3 just by how they were written accidentally imply the fate of every toy is eventually to be abandoned buried alive in a dump somewhere crying their asses off. It’s all gonna happen eventually. So offering the option to retire happily, and showing that toys can just get together and be happy rather than become trash, locked up, or in some abusive day care system, really makes a difference. The first three movies create such intense separation anxiety, it needed to be released
Get ready for Toy Story 5, that's actually happening.
>Get ready for Toy Story 5, that's actually happening
Seriously? Is it at least gonna have the same cast?
Gross.
Correct.
My man.
Soundtrack is underrated.
I wouldn’t even be able to argue him. Space Jam represents a lot of stupid and awful things, but it’s just so ridiculous it’s fun. The sequel was horrid though.
Honestly I like 4's ending better than 3's. While 3's ending always makes me cry unlike 4's ending. 4's ending felt like a much more conclusive ending for Woody as a character. Think back to when Woody was left at the gas station at Toy Story 1 and how distraught and defeated he felt when he became a lost toy and think about how many times Woody's voice box came in handy or how Woody reacted to Andy having Buzz as his new favorite toy. Now compare those to Toy Story 4 and you'll see where I'm coming from.
3's ending was perfect for everyone who grew up with the first 2 toy story movies.
4's ending was perfect for Woody's character.
This
But Space Jam was great.
Space Jam 2 was Corpo homosexualry: The Movie
The original Space Jam was a corporate cashgrab, too. Did you forget that the idea spawned from Air Jordan commercials?
But it at least had the decency to create a proper narrative that constrained itself to Michael and the Looney Tunes universe.
SJ1 felt like a corporate joke stretched out to movie length. But it was at least aware of its joke and just rolled with it, playing it mostly straight.
Space Jam 2 felt made by mandate of WB's marketing department and desperately tried to shove in every possible property that they owned. It was a joke that kept trying to nudge the audience with a bunch of "see what I did there? See that joke? See? See?" And it didn't help that LBJ has far less charisma that Jordan.
Not that anon, but I think a charm of Space Jam was how they took such a stupid idea and gave 110%. The animation, the effort in actually creating a story, giving the cameo actors/athletes actual impact in the story, the amazing soundtrack, it’s hard not to admire a movie that made lemonade out of rotten lemons.
Space Jam 2 is the reverse of everything I just said. The animation is awful, the CGI is awful, the story’s convoluted and stupid, the soundtrack’s crap, and half the time it’s MEMBER THIS PROPERTY.
Space Jam 2 could have been fun if it wasn't a blatant nostalgia pandering cash grab.
Are you sure you weren't hit in the head? People loved Space Jam.
Chuck Jones hated Space Jam, but then again Chuck Jones was a big purist about a lot of shit.
Space Jam is the perfect kind of mess, Jordan can't act but he's enough charsma to get away with it, there a lot of corny jokes and shamless product placement but it was also the perfect amount of selfwareness without the lamp shading being too shameless, also it was only 90 mins, it's over when all ends are tied up
2 was the opposite of this
Can't speak for everyone but I think a lot loved this despite its flaws.
It’s allright. I tend to view Space Jam as more of an advertisement than a real movie but it’s a well made ad.
It's a mess but it's a fun mess, my only complaint is that Lola didn't get anywhere near enough screen time to establish a personality for herself.
I've never met anyone in real life who dislikes space jam.
the only thing I don't like about it is that how they weren't even in space...
CyberSpace Jam
Isn't it weird how they never sell toys that actually look like the ones in the movie? YouTube is full of tutorials on how you can decapitate x woody doll to put its head on a another body and stuff
movie toylines are mainly targeted at young children, not autistic adult collectors. the former doesn't really care about exact movie accuracy as long as their Buzz Lightyear is vaguely recognizable
So did the Japanese.
I liked Monster Inc. 2, too.
This movie wasn't objectively bad but a bunch of Calarts Pixar nepo babies making a movie about how you don't need to go to the best school to make your dream come true is pretty damn hypocritical.
It is hypocritical as frick you're right. But I still love Mike as the hero playing to his strengths. Everybody loves an underdog story and that hard work and perseverance can beat the odds. Even if I don't believe it all the time.
The movie isn't about either of these things. Mike explicitly cannot be a scarer. He just doesn't have it in him. It's the equivalent of trying to be an olympic runner when you have a bad leg, or something similar. The movies message is you can still be happy even if you don't make the cut for your original dream.
That's why he ends up studying for a totally different, but adjacent career. That being more of a scare coach. He decides to stop pretending his weaknesses (Simply not scary) don't exist and instead play to his strengths. (Book smarts and leadership)
I’m not sure how you got that message out of the movie, because it was entirely about how Mike and Sully made up for each other’s faults. Mike’s crisis was very real and surprisingly honest for a Disney movie.
Bil Gates and Steve Jobs didn't need to finish college and mike and sully together were basically their equivalents.
Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard because Harvard didn't offer the advanced computers classes he wanted to take. So unless you can say that you're such a genius that Harvard can't keep up with you, stay the frick in school.
And Steve Jobs had rich parents who helped fun his startup. Not to mention Wozniak doing all the real legwork.
That’s not the message at all.
University wasn’t that good, but I was very surprised how realistic it was.
>Mike is a scaring genius, but he’s not able to pull it off himself.
>Sully is a natural athlete but is unmotivated and lacks a lot of the critical thinking his sport requires.
>Mike coaching Sully is unstoppable.
I actually really liked that message. Sometimes no matter what you do, it’s not going to be enough, but that doesn’t mean you quit and go home. Sometimes your expertise or strengths simply need to be redirected into the right spot.
love this movie but i also heavily disagree that Mike isn't/can't be scary. Imagine waking up to an eyeball twice the size of your head staring back at you
It would be more frightening to an adult than to a child, I think.
You can tell how bad animation is these days when the modern day Roger Rabbit can't even make its 2D main character actually 2D.
frick you, I like it
Ugly Sonic and JK Gumby saved it.
I was very surprised that I didn't hate it. I don't think it is good by any measure, but not as horrible as I expected it to be.
I probably would even liked it, if it had original characters and wasn't connected to Chip'n Dale at all.
But what DID you like about it outside of technical aspects? Even the soundtrack was mostly garbage filled with old reused songs.
I watched it and I liked it. There really doesn't have to be more to it.
I guess if you’re a teaspoon-deep consumer with no critical thinking, sure. Here, pull up a chair and get some popcorn, two roaches over here look like they’re gonna fight. Seems right up your alley.
Like you, I fricked it
NO
NONONONONO
WATCH MY 6 HOUR BREAKDOWN OF A 2 HOUR MOVIE WHERE I SCREAM LIKE A BABY AT EVERYThING
IDIOT
i know i'm preaching at the choir here, but i hate these empty autistic ego trips made by terminally-online, socially awkward adults against mass media made for toddlers.
there's no value found in this kind of shit. the people who actually made this type of trash are culturally-illiterate midwits who spend most of their leisure time smelling their own farts
*preaching to
Dilate
Shut up, GamingMagic13
>Youtube video nearly 5 times longer than the film
Why do morons like you think this rule exists? Who said you can’t spend more time shitting on a bad movie than the movies runtime? Because you can’t focus on anything longer than 5 minutes? Poor little baby, try killing your self.
What a pointless fricking comeback. Of course you can do anything but you still look and act like a total mongrel moron doing it.
Reviews of movies should not be longer than the fricking movie. End of the fricking story!
>six hour rant video about a corporate cash grab
Man, zoomers really are built different.
And now I remember the time when his friend didn't have an absolute seething hatred for the movie, he nearly had an aneurysm.
I watched this entire thing, and while some of his choice in vernacular is pretty childish, he's got 100% pin point accuracy on every point he makes
His pure, unadulterated autistic fury had me on the edge of my seat throughout the full run time, I wish I had this dude's ability to not give a frick about giving every frick
He's probably right but does it really need to be 6 fricking hours long?
Your life didn’t need to be this long, yet here you are.
This movie is garbage and you can't change that
But he’s right though. You can be upset that its top long or he’s autistic for being this upset at a movie but he’s 100% right.
His latest Indy video kept me company.
I saw it in its entirety. That guy is absolutely right, the movie murders characters left and right.
frick you I hate it
it's anon,that's called having a shitty taste. I'm guilty of that too
The hourly threads seething about it a decade later are pathetic.
Korra and her show were both very flawed, but nowhere near as bad as autistic twats here tried to make them out to be.
And for all those that thought the ending came out of nowhere, it didn't. You're just too moronic to pick up on subtext of basic human interaction.
But it did come out of nowhere anon, the subtext was so diluted that gay autists on tumblr shipped the ever living frick out of them for being in the same frame.
And the avatar team said "yeah sure why not" trying to gain clout. Which ended biting them in the ass in thier next project when Klance Fandom decided to threaten them to make thier ship canon in Voltron.
Never feed a stray dog.
Oh look, another autist that couldn't read human interaction.
>Oh look, another autist that couldn't read human interaction.
Ok, your moronic. Got it. Now I know to ignore you.
Says the homosexual that can't spell "you're."
lol
lmao
rofl, even
>loses argument
>spellchecks to salvage argument
>lol
>lmao
>rofl, even
Only moronic newbies talk like this.
>Subtext
Motherfricker they barely even interacted, let alone established that they were good friends, LET ALONE established that they had feelings for each other, I know there isn't a lot of good lesbian representation in cartoons but please stop being desperate this shit ain't it.
Wut. They spent a lot of time in season 2 establishing them as friends. And then time in season 3 implying more. And got even heavier in season 4.
You type like a speedwatcher, or worse a secondary who didn't even bother to watch it.
A few scenes that establish that Asami somehow decided the girl who ruined her relationship with her boyfriend does not a relationship make, it is exceedingly bad writing justified only by shippers who overdosed on copium when the writers decided to pander to them.
>You're just too moronic to pick up on subtext of basic human interaction.
This. Asami was the only one Korra kept in contact with when she fricked off over her ptsd and Asami took care of her while she was crippled. Korra fell for Mako after seeing his ass once, cartoon relationships don't really need a lot especially if romance isn't the focus of the show
I dunno man, it seems pretty fricking weak compared to all the focus and attention Aang x Katara had.
LTBG trash
Encanto. It’s not perfect but it’s better than Strange World
Yeah I liked Encanto, and it grew on me the more I rewatched it.
Encanto is great, I wouldn't call it hated, maybe some astrturfed back lash cause of one moronic Twitter post
This is more enjoyable than Meet the Robinsons. There, I said it. Also why do people screech about this one so much when Home on the Range is the one that killed 2d animation altogether?
It captured the essence of the She Hulk 80s comics perfectly. The writers clearly did their research on what She Hulk is and should be like, they captured the tone they were going for very well, Tatiana Maslany was awesome. The only dumb thing was Jennifer completely dismissing Hulk's trauma in episode 1 or 2 and implying she has it worse than The Hulk because shes a woman, and the Megan Thee Stallion Twerk scene. Other than that it was great.
Anyone who complained about how silly and not serious is clearly doesn't understand She Hulk and anyone who complained about the Fourth Wall breaking scene in the finale has never read a She Hulk ever. It felt like it was specifically targeted just because a woman main character and thats auto placed in the "woke" box.
This was more on the line of the Dan Slott run than the 80's run. That being said, the show was pretty bad and boring overall. Anyone who defends it just goes on autopilot about "toxic masculinity" and "they don't like cause le-women bad". Which is kinda stupid considering we had Wandavision which was centered around Scarlet Witch, which was not only well written, but allowed the character to feel real. I get that SheHulk was a comedy, but damn, not only was it not funny, it was boring on top of it. Jennifer, albeit amazing in her early run in the comics, does not reflect her comics counterpart. Being somehow bot annoying AND pathetic at the same time.
>It captured the essence of the She Hulk 80s comics perfectly. The writers clearly did their research on what She Hulk is and should be like, they captured the tone they were going for very well, Tatiana Maslany was awesome.
In what fricking universe was it anywhere close to the Byrne run? Because she looked at the camera once? Did you work on the show?
>ITT frick you I have absolutely trash taste, I’m what’s wrong with modern cinema, and I’m proud!
FTFY
My favorite movie of all time
I watch it once a month
Frick you Rotten Tomatoes
Sites like RT and IMDB have shite taste and people who use them as a frame of reference are stupid
Knights Tale is great, for some reason they showed on TV when I was in college, me and friends all loved it
>HE WILL ROCK YOU
What does that even mean?
It's so dumb and so historically inaccurate, but I and every medieval history professor I've ever met still love it.
It’s the right kind of stupid, honestly.
Obligatory
Fosters Home for Imaginary Friends
MCU needed more low-stakes personal stories to rebuild the foundation, and less multiverse shit.
But did it need to exist?
Finished watching it not too long ago. Can't fricking discuss it here because it's disregarded as "soulless toy-driven garbage from the 80s" despite being an actual cartoon first with toys made around it later, having an interesting plot and fun world building and a satisfying finale.
>and a satisfying finale.
Something the 2011 reboot didn't have and wasn't going to.
A shame but it genuinely saddens me how Cinemaphile just disregards the original as nothing but a toy commercial when it wasn't one and nobody gives it a fair shot. Everything from the 80s gets fricked out of discussion. A shame, I also liked Bravestarr.
Ed Edd n Eddy
Cow & Chicken.
It helped spawn Chowder and Billy and Mandy.
I never understood why people were fine with those but somehow C&C is worst.
I've only seen it in recent years, when I was a kid, C&C was popular among my elementary school peers, just like most others Cartoon Cartoons.
It's not bad, it's just nothing great. I prefered I am Weasal
Mama had a chicken!
Mama had a cow!
Dad was proud!
He didn't care how!!
The only time I ever see people talk about this show is to bring up the carpet munchers joke.
The poor mans Ren and Stimpy, with the only saving grace being Redman.
I like how most of the characters looked in this game. Rocksteady's character are a little too uncanny. They look like a weird hybrid between real people and puppets from Spitting Image.
I liked Chicken Little.
The songs were great.
Were people looking for some hard-hitting emotional plot points.... in a car spy thriller?
Anyway, frick you all, this movie is kino.
Preach.
Someone pointed out once that Woody's line in the first movie perfectly sets up his character arc in each movie.
"No one's getting replaced, this is Andy we're talking about. It doesn't matter how much we're played with, what matters is that we're there for Andy when he needs us and that's what we're made for, right?".
"No one's getting replaced, this is Andy we're talking about" - Toy Story 1, with Woody feeling like he's being replaced by Buzz.
"It doesn't matter how much we're played with" - Toy Story 2, with Woody learning that being with Andy will be great while it lasts.
"What matters is that we're there for Andy when he needs us" - Toy Story 3, with Woody learning that Andy no longer needs him and the other toys.
"And that's what we're made for, right?" - Toy Story 4, with Woody learning to be what he is in the moment.
It had a lot of funny moments honestly. The first that come to mind is the whole thing Buzz's inner voice and that joke where he's getting ready to start his plan to steal the key they need and the security guard inadvertently tosses it like right on top of him so he lies about how hard it was. It didn't need to exist for sure but at least I wasn't unamused for an hour and a half.
zoomer here, i grew up on the first two movies and grew out of them before 3 hit and now after the fourth one came out it feels strange and wrong seeing it out in the open, like it had its time, let my childhood go
also frick you homosexual millennials for shitting up the conversation about it, why can't you learn to not care
The Savino seasons were funny and Cinemaphile just seethes about the artstyle.
congrats on having shit taste you deranged bawd
2 was garbage though
Are they not all garbage? What separates 2 from the rest?
1 had heart.
2 was tropefest.
3 was an attempt.
What even is this?
A money laundering scheme
Also Inside Out and Coco as well, Cinemaphile only seems to hate these movies because they're popular
People hate Coco?
On this site they do. Not as much as the other ones I've mentioned though
I don't know man, this movie had a pretty great world and I liked most of the characters inside Riley's mind (except Bing-Bong)
>Inside Out
I dislike this one because it was so damn forgettable. It could have been so much more interesting..
>Pixar's MOST CREATIVE movie
Sing 2 was fun, but it was just a rehash of "Buster lies to everyone and it magically works out in the end" from the first one.
Has flaws, but it's cool, and closer to the comics than Netflix DD. (Which only has one semi-good season). I much prefer this version, entirely unironically.
Toy Story 4 could have worked if it was about how we relate to people who were with us, we loved a lot in our past but for whatever reason they left and now they are very different, due to our different experiences in life.
Bo could have simply been someone Woody loved before but now she's different and he won't necessarily be forced to be with her again.