theres already schools in America who show this in history class
an entire generation of Americans will believe a bunch of sassy sheboons twerked their way to the moon with African maths and shiiit while all the white man did was stand in their way
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>untold but true
>source: trust me bro
It's "emotionally true" and that's what really matters.
having staff like these woman was how they were able to get away with the hoax moon landings. The staff weren't in on the hoax and they were too dumb to figure it out. Like trained chimps pushing buttons for snax.
Youre actually dumber than most 1960s Blacks if you believe it was a hoax
Show me the proof. Where's the proof? There's no proof.
Those are just funny looking rocks.
Explain the tire tracks then.
Dried rivers or craters idk I'm no geologist.
Then how do you know that the descent stage is a "funny looking rock"
What point are you even trying to make
>Then how do you know that the descent stage is a "funny looking rock"
The other unlabeled white spots in the picture are rocks, why would that one be any different?
They have telemetry that matches woth how far out different things were, plus the tire tracks radiate from that one spot
>idk I'm no geologist.
yeah, you're a fricking moron.
Should I have said seleneologist? Fricking pedant
Faked. And easily so. These images were supposed to be as high or higher resolution than satellites looking at earth, which images you can tell the make of a car on the ground. However when they came out the resolution was far less than was promised. They were pixelated as frick (your image has been smoothed - the originals are more pixelated than this). No one ever questioned it of course, and NASA never offered a reason for the discrepancy.
The reason is it's easier to convincingly fake low res images.
>which images you can tell the make of a car on the ground
Anon, those are taken by low flying aircraft
I'm talking about the top of range private Satellite images you frick
Okay then compare the LRO specs to whatever satellite you want to cherrypick yourself queer
the LRO doesn't have the angular resolution to please morons that haven't opened a book in their lives on underground throat yodeling forums. even the newest indian orbiter confirmed the apollo sites.
Imagine believing these images are real.
the stated measurement per pixel was way more in the images than they had promised before the mission. Comparable images from satellites orbiting earth can show cars in enough resolution to tell what make they are. That's the resolution they promised. They delivered pixelated as frick jpgs and no one gave a frick
>"HUHDUH, that's all da proof I need!"
None of you NASA fan boys give a frick about the facts. You greedily lap up what ever NASA gives you like it's an Asian prostitute's turd dangling into you open mouth. They're laughing you.
>than they had promised before the mission.
..anon, the LRO images are from 2011
They talked about the satellite mission before it happened in 2011 you moron. They made press releases and told people about how good the image would be. In fact, they used the brand new twitter at the time to hype it up. And then shat on everything they said with the shitty images.
arguing about the apollo "hoax" with a moron online is a pointless waste of time and i've already wasted 3 (Yous)
it's not some grand conspiracy that everyone but you is in on. no matter how many lies i spend time debunking, it'll further cement you into your delusion. it was the result of millions of man hours by thousands of people that were good at their jobs. it would have been easier to just fricking go to the moon than convincingly fake it and maintain that illusion for over 50 years to people who are very intelligent and would love to bring america down a peg. you aren't that guy.
I would have been easier to fake it, since not leaving earth and killing all your astronauts in the process is easier than doing that. It was a film production no different than any major budget Hollywood special effects studio movie except for that fact that it was done in secret. People working in NASA were sat in front of their computers monitoring the out puts - all that stuff was preprogrammed. They thought it was real, they were not in on it. It was easy to do back then. It would be far more difficult to do now, hence why man will never "go back" and the next mission will continue to be delayed indefinitely. People are far more sophisticated with regards media and technology these days, it would be immensely hard to hide it from the internet. It was a piece of piss to pull off in comparison back in the 1960's. And even then they left a trail of breadcrumbs a mile wide. You can tell from amateur film footage of rocket take offs that it's moving too slow and at too steep an angle to early to reach space. The rockets never left our atmosphere. They crashed into the Atlantic. If can be deduced mathematically from footage, the angle of the rocket, the timing, that they couldn't have reached more than a distance of about 30 miles out to sea, where they likely dipped down and crashed into the Atlantic.
3 guys with HAM radios and the capability to do math just debunked your moronic theory moron. if you can't figure out what i meant, don't even reply.
No one independent "tracked" the radio signals:
>2.2: 'Independent' tracking of radio signals
Halfway down the page:
https://www.aulis.com/record.htm
https://www.honeysucklecreek.net/other_stations/bochum/index.html
why would you lie on the internet?
Honeysuckle Creek was under NASA control - top pic, NASA logo. NASA operates facilities around the world. They are not independent facilities.
you didn't even read the article.
>In the 1957 – 1975 period, the 20 metre parabolic antenna of the Bochum Observatory in (the then) West Germany was often in the news as it received transmissions from Russian and American space vehicles. The Director at the time, Professor Heinz Kaminski, was able to provide confirmation of events and data independent of both the Russian and US space agencies.
And why do NASA fan boys always use the smoothed annotated version of these images. The originals are ridiculously pixelated, ugly as frick images. Insultingly poor quality. And NASA fan boys instead of complaining about the discrepancy smooth out the images to make them seem higher res. You're making their lies more palatable FOR FREE.
kek this is from India, not NASA
It doesn't matter. Space agencies collude to a massive degree. Even NASA and ROSCOSMOS work together still. And NASA rules the roost. They are not independent of each other. And the other space agencies worry about upsetting NASA. It's beyond geo politics, literally.
You literally just admitted that the LRO doesnt match the res of your super secret spy satellite, thats the point you double frick
fricking thirdies
go back to hovel, shit in the corner, and seethe about america more
>the hoax moon landings
well at least you understand there were several and not one. You get a D-.
Moon landing is real but the footage is fake.
>there's wind on le moon!
It happened because Soviet satellites detected it, they would have raised a big stink if they had any proof, but that footage is fake as frick.
's wind on le moon!
The dust is being kicked up wtf are you talking about
>Moon landing happened
>Cameras are not real
What level of moron is this?
They could not be sure they could get a clear broadcast due to radiation so they filmed it beforehand.
They literally made a new camera
Yeah but still could not be sure about solar radiation due to unpredictable solar flares. People do not realize how bad the radiation is on the surface of the moon.
There was a solar flare that nearly ruined the spirit and opportunity mission, it's a risk of any space mission.
>didnt know about radiation on moon
They had several lunar orbital missions, they knew the levels of radiation on the surface, theres no reason to believe it would be different than in the vacuum near the surface
and every apollo astronaut received high levels of radiation
Our eyes are not real so obviously cameras can't be, moron.
>that footage is fake as frick.
In what way?
movies have no place in a good school
When I was in high school, after the world history section about Ancient Egypt the teacher showed us all of Brendan Fraser's Mummy movies. He also met Brendan at an airport bar, so he talked about this in the lectures. The breakdown for the 3 week section on Egypt was as follows: 25% actual info from the textbook, 50% Mummy movies, 25% Brendan Fraser stories. It was the greatest class I ever took.
Oh frick that's a great time
could anything be more American than that? egad
Does this look fricking real to you lmao? It was a hoax intended to bankrupt the Soviets.
What about it looks fake, other than the disingenuous speeding up of the film
why have the russians not even once tried to call it a hoax then? It would be a pretty good propaganda victory for them to prove moon landings were fake
>prove moon landing is fake
>americans expose soviet economy and military might are fake too
>collapse
JUDY HOPPS JUDY HOPPS JUDY HOPPS
I wish the moon landings were fake.
The worst thing about the whole escapade that they DO want to keep secret is them taking a little Chinese girl to the moon to record them taking off from the surface. They tried to come up with an automated system to focus and move the camera but couldn't get it to work, so trained her at the last minute. They told her they would come back for her but never did. She's still dead on the moon to this day and they don't want anyone to ever find poor little Jing.
?t=173
They needed a tiny, skinny but relatively intelligent child for low weight, minimal oxygen, and space requirements. The saddest part is her looking back to the surface and manually panning around confused after they left, slowly coming to the realisation they are never coming back, and they tricked her. Then it tilts down at the surface right in front of her capsule. NASA liars cannot explain either how they got the shot, or what happens after.
kek
I know how it sounds. That was pretty much my reaction until I looked into it. I mean it's fricking nuts and pretty sick shit when you find out it's actually real. Now I don't think it's funny at all. I can't even look at the moon anymore without thinking about her up there alone and how she died. It's a very hard reality to live with.
I do not remember the teletubbies going to the moon
>Euler's Method!
>*timid whiny voice cracker* b-but that's ancient math!
>SIT YO UNSEASONED CHICKEN ASS DOWN AND BE HUMBLE!
>*whole theater starts hootin and hollerin*
One of my colleagues showed this not as a history unit but in the fricking math unit. I was livid.
there really needs to be fines for that sort of thing
>forced to walk half a mile to a bathroom because of segregation
never happened
>made a critical discovery when no one else did
never happened
>experienced racism and discrimination
never happened
>her white ally is a israeli holocaust survivor (oy very!)
he was polish catholic and immigrated before any war
>"whites only" sign destroyed in a fit of defiance
never happened, no one cares what bathroom she used
gee I wonder why it was written this way
>screenwriter ~~*Theodore Melfi*~~ said he saw no problem with adding the scenes, saying, "There needs to be white people who do the right thing, there needs to be Black people who do the right thing, and someone does the right thing. And so who cares who does the right thing, as long as the right thing is achieved?"
Also she was a quadroon or something and not a full Black person
I liked it.
I'm surprised at how bad anyone born post 2000 is at math without the help of a calculator.
To be fair: they can't dissect parapgraphs either and they don't have anything stored in their heads.
*knock knock knock*
penny
*knock knock knock*
penny
*knock knock knock*
penny
Do you want to hear about the word of God?
lel
Why did Gil Scott-Heron complain about whitey on the moon if it was actually a Black achievement?
It's all bullshit.
Like how women weren't allowed to do anything before the CURRENT YEAR. Meanwhile, in the 1920's ... picrel.
The entire movie was pure historical revisionism.
They even had to invent a racist character just so they could bring up muh racism.
nice edit
kino
Moon landing is fake but the footage is real.
Y’all ready for Steven Spielberg’s next kino?
>kinos that changed historical perspective
Frick off with this shit.
"Behind every great WHITE achievement, there was a sassy fat-ass she-boon pulling the strings"...FRICK...OFF
>arguing about the apollo "hoax" with a moron online *chugs onions* is a pointless waste of time and i've already *chugs onions* wasted 3 (Yous) *chugs onions*
>it's not some grand conspiracy *chugs onions* that everyone but you is in on. no matter how many lies i spend time debunking, it'll further cement you into your delusion. *chugs onions* it was the result of millions of man hours by thousands of people *chugs onions* that were good at their jobs. it would have been easier to just fricking go to the moon *chugs onions* than convincingly fake it and maintain that illusion for over 50 years to people who are very intelligent and would love to bring *chugs onions* america down a peg. you aren't that guy.
the ultimate concession
THEY’RE NOT PEOPLE
>black people in the 1960s
>whitey on da mooon wasting money 'n' sheeeiiit, gimmie dat money fo' dem pogramzz!
>black people now
>we wuz atrsonauts 'n' sheeeeiit, we got yo' pale azzes up der!
Why the change in rehtoric?
Blacks are delusional narcissists.
seeing moon landing deniers btfo makes me happy
Propaganda machine putting out fake movies about fake Black folk being fake barred from fake Black person bathrooms while fake doing fake calculations that got Whitey to the moon.
But you go ahead and believe any other shit they tell you as gospel. I'm sure they'd never lie or fake anything else.
>seeing moon landing deniers btfo makes me happy
btfo seething samehomosexual
he went crazy after the LRO resolution posts
>be NASA
>have to basically take the role of alt right nazis all to say "NUH UH THAT DIDNT HAPPEN" to the black women movie
>meanwhile Black folk use this movie as a talking point that one black lady got us to the moon and everyone else just sat around being racist and moronic
ya love to see it
You are on this NASA council, but we do not grant you he rank of NASA scientist
Art imitates life imitates art