>Jarvis, invent time travel
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>Jarvis, invent time travel
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>asspull time travel just to win after already getting defeated
what a bunch of cheaters. Thanos deserved his victory
Thanos plan was fricking moronic. He destroys 50% of all life. 50 years ago the population was 3.5 billion. So in 50 years the population will be right back where it started. He would have to constantly be using the stones to destroy life every 50 years or it would be pointless. But he destroyed the stones so he wouldn't even be able to do that.
His whole plan was to conserve resources. Resource consumption is not equally distributed amount the population. Despite being a third of the population of India, the US consumes far more resources than them and the rest of the world. So just equally deleting half of life doesn't mean you are going to preserve resources.
thanos' original plan was "kill half of all life as a sign of his devotion to death" because he's a simp
there's probably an interview explaining why they changed it
Because they didn't want the audience to side with the villain.
Would have been kind of silly to introduce shit like Death and Sandman into that universe at that point.
>US consumes far more resources than them and the rest of the world.
Define "resources".
fossil fuels, coal, minerals, water
>fossil fuels,
Wtf. India is top 3 in the world for Fossil Fuel use.
>coal
Lmao. Did you do any research? India ranks #2 in the world of coal usage and outranks the USA.
>minerals
Too vague. Be specific
>water
You expect the USA to...use less of its own water?? You are next to the ocean. Build some desalination plants. Wtf is this complaint?
>India is top 3 in the world for Fossil Fuel use.
They still use only half of what the US uses.
>Did you do any research? India ranks #2
Are you moronic? PER CAPITA the US uses almost 3 times as much coal which was my entire point. The US uses more resources PER PERSON than countries with larger populations. Meaning if you wanted to save resources, taking out an american would save more than taking out an indian you dense moron.
>desalination plants
Incredibly inefficient and expensive.
1. Having lots of sex and many kids is not an achievement. Any country can do that. Who cares if India has the biggest population?
2. Thanos isn't concerned with who uses the resources. Only that resource consumption is reduced to manageable levels.
3. And its half of ALL life. ALL. Humans, animals, pets, bugs, flies, bacteria, etc. That means less food, less animals, less child bearing couples. Did Thanos divide the snap evenly across all age groups or was it truly random? Did newborn babies suddenly vanish? Did kids vanish too?
That Population of 8 billion suddenly reduced to 4 billion isn't going to recover in just 50 years. Thats not how growth works. Many other factors matter.
>1
I never said having a large population is an achievement. I just said they don't use as many resources as a much smaller population in a far richer country. meaning that ->
>2
If your plan is to concern resources than you should remove the ones actually using up the resources you dense mother fricker.
>3
The plague didn't care how old you were either and the population recovered just fine. The population might not get back to 7 billion exactly but it's going to recover pretty fricking quickly. You can always grow more food or raise more chickens.
Thano plan delayed resource consumption for a little while but we are talking about a single life time of savings at most.
>The population might not get back to 7 billion exactly but it's going to recover pretty fricking quickly. You can always grow more food or raise more chickens.
The reason population grew in the last 50 years is because India, China, Africa breed like rabbits. Western country'a population has stayed relatively the same. Why is India and Africa having so many kids when your infrastructure and resources can't support it?
>Why is India and Africa having so many kids when your infrastructure and resources can't support it?
Because fricking is free and fun. Not that that's a reasonable excuse, but it is the reason.
>Why is India and Africa having so many kids when your infrastructure and resources can't support it?
1. Traditional roles for women
2. Lack of ready available contraception and lack of acceptance
3. Children can be used for labor
So in general a poverty and cultural thing. Poor westerners also tend to have more children.
>Lack of ready available contraception
BS! Condoms are available everywhere in India. Supermarkets, drug stores, hospitals, clinics and even vending machines.
>The US uses more resources PER PERSON
Per capita cope. Not the rest of the world's problem. You clearly live in India. Stop having so many kids. Then your stats will normalize.
>Condoms are available everywhere in India
>1. Traditional roles for women
Not our problem. Fix your culture if you don't like it.
>2. Lack of ready available contraception and lack of acceptance
Lies. Condoms are everywhere in India and for free in many places.
>3. Children can be used for labor
You have enough children. Stop. You have more population than China. Where are you putting all those people?
>Where are you putting all those people?
US/Mexican border, also Canada
>Where are you putting all those people?
Canada
The pill is the game changer. Nobody wants to use condoms every fricking time in the marital bed.
Why doesn't Thanos just find a way to reverse entropy?
>"All planets are habitable and abundant with animal and plant life"
*SNAP*
There, I fixed the universe to favor life and be less inhospitable, enabling quadrillions more to live and thrive. Death probably won't return my calls anymore but at least I'm a hero now.
>Despite being a third of the population of India, the US consumes far more resources than them and the rest of the world
Hmm...lets fact check that. Nope. India uses more.
per person you dense moron. Try again.
the point is that resources aren't used equally among populations, so if your goal is to conserve resources then doing it evenly among the population isn't the best way to go about it.
>the point is that resources aren't used equally among populations,
Thanos doesn't care about that. He only cares about TOTAL resources used. He randomized the killing to make it fair.
>TOTAL resources used
Again, if that was your goal doing it per capita would be the way to go.
Why do you gays have such a hard time understanding this concept? This isn't about race or politics. I'm not defending or criticizing india or the US. It's pure statistics.
>Möbius strip inverted
That makes no sense.
he inputted the params and the ai supported by kilotons of information did its job
>jav.ai create a picture of a monkey with a hat
tony is the first prompt engineer
so tony is really TANEESH
JARVIS SIRS I WOULD LIKE TO REDEEM THE TIME TRAVEL SIR
Why did Wanda want to frick this computer so bad
Computer dick has unlimited stamina.
>generates hologram of folded paper poked through with a pencil
>invents time travel
>perfects extremis, curing himself and millions of amputees
>creates multiple sentient AI super intelligence
>invents renewable clean energy but shares it with no one
>invents nano technology
All of this when his greatest achievement 10 years before was a big bomb called the jericho. Every single one of these inventions would change the world but they act like none of it matters and completely ignore them in universe.
Super hero shit is gay and moronic.!!!! FACT !!!!
this, thor and giant green man are too serious for Death
>Jarvis, perfect penis enlargement surgery then perform it in me
Does Thanos ever specify if it's 50% of all life as in all life in general, or 50% of all life like as in 50% of a species, all species? Because if it's 50% of all life in general there is a good chance that he'd actually be killing a much larger portion because of how much it'd frick ecosystems. Like imagine if included in that 50% of all life was all plant life on Earth? Some 90% of the rest of the planet is going to die next with them gone. If he snaps 50% of the population of every species, then he hardly changes anything. 50% of humans are going to use the same amount of 50% of organic resources as 100% humans are going to use 100% of organic resources, the only resources Thanos has effectively saved are inorganic which are thousands of times more available in the universe than organic ones. Fricking stupid space fruit.
>my plan is to population cull by 1/2
>because resources are finite
>then I will destroy the stones
>so when the population blows up again, no one can do anything about it like I did
Brilliant plan fricking moron
some real fricking morons ITT