In not even a month? How did we even get to where we are now if we didn't have the instinct to form together and establish or re-establish civilization as quickly as possible?
The main point is that the British authorities are completely unprepared for the eventuality, so the immediate effects are far worse than they could have been under better circumstances. The social breakdown begins before the bombs have even dropped, in response to have handed heavy handed and badly coordinated measures be central and local governments to prepare, and the aftermath is followed by a complete failure of the authorities to re-establish any degree of order. It is very pointedly a critique of British state, primarily civil defence policies going way back to the 1950s, and trying to apply that more universal theming to it is just missing the mark
If it was handled terribly during the cold-war, a time when people were at least somewhat prepared for a nuclear war, imagine what it would be like today when there is basically nothing around anymore.
>instinct to form together and establish or re-establish civilization
Civilization is the opposite with human instinct. People were forced into civilization by rulers looking to scale up their power and wealth. If instinct governed humanity, we'd still be living off the land without a care in the world as we did in pre-history.
Think about it. Even after thousands of years of civilization, we still have to arrest/imprison/kill people who commit antisocial behaviors, force people to work to survive, and put in a lot of effort to keep our system functioning.
The only way a person can know about civilization is to learn about it after birth. Someone born to a stone-age tribe like on Sentinel Island has no idea what civilization is, nor wants to. If we have to constantly put in effort and use force or threat of violence to maintain something, it's not natural.
Depends on the region. Places with major military facilities/major industrial areas would be similar to this but in the U.S. countryside things would be a little calm until the people fleeing from the cities come and start fricking shit up. In places like South Africa and Australia (barring a few major runways/port cities) it would happen without anyone noticing.
even if we didn't, i reckon the fallout would still frick everything up - not to mention but wouldn't the emp from a massive volley of nukes up north cause a lot of damage here to our electronics?
>nukes are totally real and radiation is le bad source : trust me bro
was there ever a more moronic propaganda scare ? give humanity a few decades more until we start looking at this shit like we look at morons who still believe in moonlanding
you homosexuals are too slow to catch up unto anything in real time
Well, Japan was never invaded before it surrendered so maybe them surrendering was just a israelite op or something and somehow the israelites had a psychic power on the ruthless disciplinarian Imperial Japanese government. Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't actually that bad, Hirohito just believed in nukes like a fake moonlanding conspiracy tard- he had no idea it wasn't even that bad.
It doesn't sound right not going to lie dude. I do think pearl harbour is strange though and probably a falseflag
hiroshima and nagasaki were carpet bombed identical to every other japanese city that got carpet bombed. no central blastwave from one big bomb, surviving wooden structures etc etc etc
nuclear weapons do not exist
Well what is the situation with the Japanese government? Governments and paradigms of people seemed to respond and act as if nukes were then real and still are.
Also If nukes are not real it doesn't also mean all that DARPA crap and crazy level surveillance of earth and sound bombs, nerve agents etc. are not real.
There is also a thing called disinformation in military intelligence/counterintelligence terms and there is also a thing where they are not going to let the common public know certain things because the public are not the military chain of command.
Tfw an eastern euro spills his spaghetti on the 4chins >radiation is fake
Go stand in the sun all day tomorrow with your tracksuit off your simian asiatic chink body and then post a picture of how fake radiation is, you fricking potato
GTFO
sunburns and heat mean nukes exist? you have enlightened me, i am going to pay my taxes and report my weapons now !
truly profound mental moronation of a post
Radiation simply means energy being emitted from a focal point. A radio station emits radiation, so does a AA battery in a TV remote. I don't think you know enough about this topic to discuss this, please refrain from posting again.
You stupid fricking ESL trash.
Just in case you want to keep playing: please point out any post or point I made that isn’t 100% objectively true and accurate
> Radiation simply means energy being emitted from a focal point.
Fricking moron
5 months ago
Anonymous
You're actually too moronic to have this conversation. Keep screeching into the void, it's not gonna help.
5 months ago
Anonymous
> Just in case you want to keep playing: please point out any post or point I made that isn’t 100% objectively true and accurate >y-y-you’re too d-dumb
lol okay you fricking imbecile
5 months ago
Anonymous
You still don't understand basic wave physics, but
keep screeching though
radiation
noun
1.
PHYSICS
the emission of energy as electromagnetic waves or as moving subatomic particles, especially high-energy particles which cause ionization.
2.
BIOLOGY
divergence out from a central point, in particular evolution from an ancestral animal or plant group into a variety of new forms.
"evolution is a process of radiation not progression"
Israel has the bomb. Regional conflict could spiral out of control. What's the worst possible thing that could happen? Probably something seriously threatening the state of Israel (which I think should never have existed). They'll launch em. You know they will.
No need to exchange nukes, just cut aid and give the nudge nudge wink wink to arabia.
Israel finally not a shithole gestapo state, only 60 years overdue.
5 months ago
Anonymous
saudis don't have nukes and they're pretty much an Israeli ally by this point anyway. If saudis would nuke anyone it'll be iran. the reason palestinians did that big chimpout was to try and stop the saudis from normally recognizing israel, and the saudis already said they're still open to it so that failed.
5 months ago
Anonymous
arabs are more reliant on outside aid then israel is, this is still true if you look at a place like syria whose regime would collapse overnight if russia withdrew.
well if you launched first you would have to hit every nuclear ballistic missile in Israel (over 100) as well as every ground and air-based cruise missile and the aircraft to deliver them. You would also need to instantly destroy all 6 (soon to be 9) Israeli submarines that can launch both cruise and soon to be ballistic missiles.
A lot of these carry MIRV warheads of up to 8 warheads. You'd probably have 15 or so minutes to destroy every one before a retaliatory strike hits given early warning systems.
If even 1 gets through, millions of Americans will die horribly.
All for...an attack 60 years ago where like 20 people died.
Why don't we also nuke Iraq for the USS Stark exactly? That killed more people and was 20 years after the USS Liberty.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>dude start a nuclear war over this shit over half a century ago nobody cares about. millions must die because of the US Liberty
reasonable.
Nothing you can say or do can undo the fact that all of earth is thinking about how disgusting and problematic israelites are again
It’s almost like history repeats itself
How could you find food for months or years on end? You'd end up smashing in the head of your 8 year old neighbor's terrier, much to your horror, to feed yourself or a loved one. Imagine the circumstances that create that evil spread across a nation of millions.
Humans can generate electricity regardless of what's going on, and with electricity you can use UV lights, and with UV you can grow crops even if the sun is blocked out. People don't stop being people as soon as a crisis happens.
The point of the movie is that a full scale global nuclear war would destroy the logistics, supply chains, centres of organisation etc. that your approach relies on. It's particularly focused on the effects on the UK because it's an island dependent on imports. I read that there is only enough food in the UK at any one time to feed the entire population for about 3-4 days. If ports were nuked, power plants nuked, electronics fricked up due to EMP, shipping stopped, the UK would degenerate very rapidly. As other posters said, large swathes of lesser populated or third world countries wouldn't even notice.
When Covid started, I went to the Walmart down the block and rushed first to the kitchen supplies aisle to pick up a basket of spatulas, then to the toilet paper aisle and just started chucking spatulas at anyone who got close to the toilet paper while yelling "no you won't, mother fricker" at them as I slapped the TP into my cart. 4 years later, I still have some TP left from that hunt. What a time to be alive
still, the idea that society would roll back to the medieval age is absolutely moronic. people are very resourceful in times of crisis and you can supplement many essential things like fuel, fertilizer and electricity with their less effective counterparts for the time being.
the first few years would be rough, but people wouldnt toil the fields again and sow crops by hand when you can easily build scrap engines that run on coal and power the city with water/windmills. also the rubble would be cleared within a few years and language and civilization wouldnt just vanish. a nuclear war is surviveable, even for a modern culture depending on international trade
Part of the problem, which the beginning of the movie emphasizes, is that people are highly specialized, and when 9 million people are suddenly vaporized and another 20 million are sick from nuclear fallout, there's not many people left who know how to put things back together
I'm sure eventually people would rebuild, but remember that the movie (post-event) only focuses around a small handful of characters, we don't see how society as a whole has changed.
They still have fuel/electricity of some kind since the mutant kid watches some video on that television at one point.
If several dozen megatons of nuclear weapons were dropped in britan, people would not be resourceful lmao. There are no resources to be resourceful with, wtf are you talking about? It would even be medieval, they will be going back to the stone age, where small tribes were the largest social unit. Resources would be so thinned out that the concept of community beyond your relatives would break down. Its easy for you to intellectualize about fuel and fertitlizer when you are well fed and warm lmao, have you even ever gone without food for one day and seen how much it changes your psyche?
Name a race war that whites won. >Haiti >Rhodesia/Zimbabwe >South Africa >Brazil
Hmm, it's almost like race war means whites lose.
And no, we're not in the colonial period where you actually have power, so those don't count.
i guess the "nukes are fake" thing is just a classic meme, but of all the "X is fake" conspiracy theories it makes the least sense
I could understand why one country might pretend to have super powerful weapons that don't actually exist, but why would multiple countries all pretend to have these and pretend that they run the risk of nuclear war with one another
why though
there is no reason for a non nuke having country to go along with it
there is no reason for soviets to pretend to be scared by nato nukes during cold war
there is no reason for americans to pretend to be wary of north korean nukes
etc etc.
your moonlanding example makes even less sense, why would any country go along with the "lie" that the americans landed on the moon
>i guess the "nukes are fake" thing is just a classic meme,
youre saying that because youre uninformed
watch this kino
https://odysee.com/@NothingNewUnderTheSun:2/Nuclear-Hoax---Nukes-Do-Not-Exist!:1
also to the other anon, we landed on the moon. 6 times with people on the surface. Theres too much evidence, from other governments, to stations around the globe that help track the spacecraft, Ham radio hobbysits, etc. to corroborate the telemetry for it to be completely false.
it's pretty accurate. probably worse now because we're more reliant on tech than we were in the 80s. nuke war today = no internet, no vidya, no movies, no gps blah blah. zoomers would cry hardest
I think you've got the whole movie wrong. Threads is about looking to the future with positivity no matter how bad things may seem. Yes the Nuclear attack was bad, but there's always an upside. Twenty years after the attack Sheffield is better off than before. There's more sunshine and less smelly Pom's. As an Australian I think that's a very positive outcome.
i dislike miracle mile. too much science mumbo jumbo. i personally dont think it was done right.
one night stand came out in 1984. has a performance by midnight oil and is an australian ww3/nukekino imo.
trailer: https://youtu.be/gMy45HKk7HQ?si=DleT-qbCoMu0Q-tD
can still download/watch on archive:
https://archive.org/details/one-night-stand-1984
I thought the degradation of language thing was cheesy until I realized that's already happening irl and the apocalypse hasn't even happened yet. Incredibly realistic film.
Nah this is back when people thought nuclear weapons just magically caused the weather to change instead of nuclear winter meaning the giant firestorms cause it which has been debunked since the gulf wars now anyway
>big bomb goes boom
>humanity devolves into cavemen and can't speak or use technology anymore
Yeah that sounds totally legit.
In not even a month? How did we even get to where we are now if we didn't have the instinct to form together and establish or re-establish civilization as quickly as possible?
Most people dont know how to build things from scratch, only how to add onto the things better men than them already did
No Black folk + common good = exponential progress
I’m not racist I’ve just come to accept reality
The main point is that the British authorities are completely unprepared for the eventuality, so the immediate effects are far worse than they could have been under better circumstances. The social breakdown begins before the bombs have even dropped, in response to have handed heavy handed and badly coordinated measures be central and local governments to prepare, and the aftermath is followed by a complete failure of the authorities to re-establish any degree of order. It is very pointedly a critique of British state, primarily civil defence policies going way back to the 1950s, and trying to apply that more universal theming to it is just missing the mark
If it was handled terribly during the cold-war, a time when people were at least somewhat prepared for a nuclear war, imagine what it would be like today when there is basically nothing around anymore.
That is certainly one to ponder, isn't it?
>instinct to form together and establish or re-establish civilization
Civilization is the opposite with human instinct. People were forced into civilization by rulers looking to scale up their power and wealth. If instinct governed humanity, we'd still be living off the land without a care in the world as we did in pre-history.
Think about it. Even after thousands of years of civilization, we still have to arrest/imprison/kill people who commit antisocial behaviors, force people to work to survive, and put in a lot of effort to keep our system functioning.
The only way a person can know about civilization is to learn about it after birth. Someone born to a stone-age tribe like on Sentinel Island has no idea what civilization is, nor wants to. If we have to constantly put in effort and use force or threat of violence to maintain something, it's not natural.
>iphone goes beep
>humanity devolves into children who speak in memes and can't use technology anymore
Depends on the region. Places with major military facilities/major industrial areas would be similar to this but in the U.S. countryside things would be a little calm until the people fleeing from the cities come and start fricking shit up. In places like South Africa and Australia (barring a few major runways/port cities) it would happen without anyone noticing.
>In places like South Africa and Australia
lmao.
Australia has significant American assets. We'd be fricked
doubt russia would nuke main australian cities. china might but have to weigh up nuking a significant number of its own citizens
even if we didn't, i reckon the fallout would still frick everything up - not to mention but wouldn't the emp from a massive volley of nukes up north cause a lot of damage here to our electronics?
Now that's a person who doesn't had sex.
>nukes are totally real and radiation is le bad source : trust me bro
was there ever a more moronic propaganda scare ? give humanity a few decades more until we start looking at this shit like we look at morons who still believe in moonlanding
you homosexuals are too slow to catch up unto anything in real time
Well, Japan was never invaded before it surrendered so maybe them surrendering was just a israelite op or something and somehow the israelites had a psychic power on the ruthless disciplinarian Imperial Japanese government. Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't actually that bad, Hirohito just believed in nukes like a fake moonlanding conspiracy tard- he had no idea it wasn't even that bad.
It doesn't sound right not going to lie dude. I do think pearl harbour is strange though and probably a falseflag
hiroshima and nagasaki were carpet bombed identical to every other japanese city that got carpet bombed. no central blastwave from one big bomb, surviving wooden structures etc etc etc
nuclear weapons do not exist
Well what is the situation with the Japanese government? Governments and paradigms of people seemed to respond and act as if nukes were then real and still are.
Also If nukes are not real it doesn't also mean all that DARPA crap and crazy level surveillance of earth and sound bombs, nerve agents etc. are not real.
There is also a thing called disinformation in military intelligence/counterintelligence terms and there is also a thing where they are not going to let the common public know certain things because the public are not the military chain of command.
dumb frogposter
Tfw an eastern euro spills his spaghetti on the 4chins
>radiation is fake
Go stand in the sun all day tomorrow with your tracksuit off your simian asiatic chink body and then post a picture of how fake radiation is, you fricking potato
GTFO
sunburns and heat mean nukes exist? you have enlightened me, i am going to pay my taxes and report my weapons now !
truly profound mental moronation of a post
Are you just pretending to be moronic?
Take the 12 seconds required to look up solar RADIATION you illiterate fricking peasant
Radiation simply means energy being emitted from a focal point. A radio station emits radiation, so does a AA battery in a TV remote. I don't think you know enough about this topic to discuss this, please refrain from posting again.
You stupid fricking ESL trash.
Just in case you want to keep playing: please point out any post or point I made that isn’t 100% objectively true and accurate
> Radiation simply means energy being emitted from a focal point.
Fricking moron
You're actually too moronic to have this conversation. Keep screeching into the void, it's not gonna help.
> Just in case you want to keep playing: please point out any post or point I made that isn’t 100% objectively true and accurate
>y-y-you’re too d-dumb
lol okay you fricking imbecile
You still don't understand basic wave physics, but
keep screeching though
>Radiation simply means energy being emitted from a focal point
lol
radiation
noun
1.
PHYSICS
the emission of energy as electromagnetic waves or as moving subatomic particles, especially high-energy particles which cause ionization.
2.
BIOLOGY
divergence out from a central point, in particular evolution from an ancestral animal or plant group into a variety of new forms.
"evolution is a process of radiation not progression"
Look at this homosexual believing in "the moon"
t. Jan Itor
>bomb go off
>still millions of people around
>still have the energy to fight, kill, and rape
lol
Israel has the bomb. Regional conflict could spiral out of control. What's the worst possible thing that could happen? Probably something seriously threatening the state of Israel (which I think should never have existed). They'll launch em. You know they will.
Conceivably the US could and should do a first strike.
>dude start a nuclear war cuz MUH PALESTINE
morons like you should die in the wars you shill
More like
>mug USS Liberty.
Americans are so slowing learning how much the israelites are not our friends.
>start a nuclear war that sees multiple US cities reduced to ash because 60 years ago israel attacked a spy ship
thank god incels have no power.
No need to exchange nukes, just cut aid and give the nudge nudge wink wink to arabia.
Israel finally not a shithole gestapo state, only 60 years overdue.
saudis don't have nukes and they're pretty much an Israeli ally by this point anyway. If saudis would nuke anyone it'll be iran. the reason palestinians did that big chimpout was to try and stop the saudis from normally recognizing israel, and the saudis already said they're still open to it so that failed.
arabs are more reliant on outside aid then israel is, this is still true if you look at a place like syria whose regime would collapse overnight if russia withdrew.
this. the USS Liberty is the biggest event in all of history and we should get nuked in trying to avenge it.
Not if we launch first.
well if you launched first you would have to hit every nuclear ballistic missile in Israel (over 100) as well as every ground and air-based cruise missile and the aircraft to deliver them. You would also need to instantly destroy all 6 (soon to be 9) Israeli submarines that can launch both cruise and soon to be ballistic missiles.
A lot of these carry MIRV warheads of up to 8 warheads. You'd probably have 15 or so minutes to destroy every one before a retaliatory strike hits given early warning systems.
If even 1 gets through, millions of Americans will die horribly.
All for...an attack 60 years ago where like 20 people died.
Why don't we also nuke Iraq for the USS Stark exactly? That killed more people and was 20 years after the USS Liberty.
>dude start a nuclear war over this shit over half a century ago nobody cares about. millions must die because of the US Liberty
reasonable.
you're unbelievably moronic
North Korea will detonate a small scale nuke in the atmosphere to create an EMP and that will trigger American MAD systems to go off
what you "think" doesn't matter, you can't stop reality.
palestinians are literally drowning in shit atm, you should join them
Nothing you can say or do can undo the fact that all of earth is thinking about how disgusting and problematic israelites are again
It’s almost like history repeats itself
Goodbye juden
probably not, it would just encourage people to read more, thus making them smarter
brits can barely speak english as it is, it's not unbelievable they'd devolve
the only unbelievable part is that they'd be important enough for a nuke
How could you find food for months or years on end? You'd end up smashing in the head of your 8 year old neighbor's terrier, much to your horror, to feed yourself or a loved one. Imagine the circumstances that create that evil spread across a nation of millions.
Humans can generate electricity regardless of what's going on, and with electricity you can use UV lights, and with UV you can grow crops even if the sun is blocked out. People don't stop being people as soon as a crisis happens.
The point of the movie is that a full scale global nuclear war would destroy the logistics, supply chains, centres of organisation etc. that your approach relies on. It's particularly focused on the effects on the UK because it's an island dependent on imports. I read that there is only enough food in the UK at any one time to feed the entire population for about 3-4 days. If ports were nuked, power plants nuked, electronics fricked up due to EMP, shipping stopped, the UK would degenerate very rapidly. As other posters said, large swathes of lesser populated or third world countries wouldn't even notice.
Hence the name "Threads". Covid taught us how easily things will break down.
When Covid started, I went to the Walmart down the block and rushed first to the kitchen supplies aisle to pick up a basket of spatulas, then to the toilet paper aisle and just started chucking spatulas at anyone who got close to the toilet paper while yelling "no you won't, mother fricker" at them as I slapped the TP into my cart. 4 years later, I still have some TP left from that hunt. What a time to be alive
still, the idea that society would roll back to the medieval age is absolutely moronic. people are very resourceful in times of crisis and you can supplement many essential things like fuel, fertilizer and electricity with their less effective counterparts for the time being.
the first few years would be rough, but people wouldnt toil the fields again and sow crops by hand when you can easily build scrap engines that run on coal and power the city with water/windmills. also the rubble would be cleared within a few years and language and civilization wouldnt just vanish. a nuclear war is surviveable, even for a modern culture depending on international trade
Part of the problem, which the beginning of the movie emphasizes, is that people are highly specialized, and when 9 million people are suddenly vaporized and another 20 million are sick from nuclear fallout, there's not many people left who know how to put things back together
I'm sure eventually people would rebuild, but remember that the movie (post-event) only focuses around a small handful of characters, we don't see how society as a whole has changed.
They still have fuel/electricity of some kind since the mutant kid watches some video on that television at one point.
If several dozen megatons of nuclear weapons were dropped in britan, people would not be resourceful lmao. There are no resources to be resourceful with, wtf are you talking about? It would even be medieval, they will be going back to the stone age, where small tribes were the largest social unit. Resources would be so thinned out that the concept of community beyond your relatives would break down. Its easy for you to intellectualize about fuel and fertitlizer when you are well fed and warm lmao, have you even ever gone without food for one day and seen how much it changes your psyche?
I live in the Threads city and it's basically already like that
I like the way one critic, who gave it a good review, put this movie. "It's the kind of film you only watch once."
Reddit types are like that. Boo boo I can only watch Come and See one boo hoo hoo.
>It wouldn't get this bad, would it?
Worse, expect race wars.
If a race war ever started, the browner races would surrender the next day
They'd slaughter all the city liberal whites first.
>Worse, expect race wars.
How is that worse? Its good
Name a race war that whites won.
>Haiti
>Rhodesia/Zimbabwe
>South Africa
>Brazil
Hmm, it's almost like race war means whites lose.
And no, we're not in the colonial period where you actually have power, so those don't count.
lets just hope that absolutely zero nukes happen to hit large metropolitan areas, might just frick with the demographic scale just a bit
it's already that bad
A nuke destroying London would be a net positive for the UK
i guess the "nukes are fake" thing is just a classic meme, but of all the "X is fake" conspiracy theories it makes the least sense
I could understand why one country might pretend to have super powerful weapons that don't actually exist, but why would multiple countries all pretend to have these and pretend that they run the risk of nuclear war with one another
I guess the Americans would lie and wouldn't admit moonlanding happened but why won't the other countries admit it ? ;^)
They are all in on the lie
why though
there is no reason for a non nuke having country to go along with it
there is no reason for soviets to pretend to be scared by nato nukes during cold war
there is no reason for americans to pretend to be wary of north korean nukes
etc etc.
your moonlanding example makes even less sense, why would any country go along with the "lie" that the americans landed on the moon
>"lie"
if you said this few decades ago id give you a pass but to believe moonlanding is real today you have to be moronic
oh look another apelike ESL Black person who can’t comprehend the white man’s technology
(moron)
>i guess the "nukes are fake" thing is just a classic meme,
youre saying that because youre uninformed
watch this kino
https://odysee.com/@NothingNewUnderTheSun:2/Nuclear-Hoax---Nukes-Do-Not-Exist!:1
can you summarise your arguments please rather than just directing me to some trojan website to watch what is presumably a five hour documentary
no
if you are interested on the topic watch it
if you arent than dont try to debate and argue in the first place
if you cant summarise your arguments and have to divert to some giant video then dont come on Cinemaphile and talk shit in the first place
again no arguments
this really is a meme isnt it
I think you're nukes are fake thing is bullshit and disinformation on the level of the flat earth psyop.
Have you ever been nuked?
Do people around you know you are moronic? Because I know you are now. You should probably tell them.
no but i just dropped a nuclear warhead in my toilet a moment ago
This movie is such a meme and so are nukes. Nukes are reddit shit.
I doubt it'd be worse than the society we live in now.
what movie
Threads (1984)
The Camp of the Saints (Gibson, 2024)
problem child 2
finally thank you anon
also to the other anon, we landed on the moon. 6 times with people on the surface. Theres too much evidence, from other governments, to stations around the globe that help track the spacecraft, Ham radio hobbysits, etc. to corroborate the telemetry for it to be completely false.
it's pretty accurate. probably worse now because we're more reliant on tech than we were in the 80s. nuke war today = no internet, no vidya, no movies, no gps blah blah. zoomers would cry hardest
I think you've got the whole movie wrong. Threads is about looking to the future with positivity no matter how bad things may seem. Yes the Nuclear attack was bad, but there's always an upside. Twenty years after the attack Sheffield is better off than before. There's more sunshine and less smelly Pom's. As an Australian I think that's a very positive outcome.
Any other civilizational breakdown kinos?
I liked this and The Road too
The War Game (1966)
Testament
how does this compare to miracle mile
that movie i found 100 times worse than threads, that final act is a rush
i dislike miracle mile. too much science mumbo jumbo. i personally dont think it was done right.
one night stand came out in 1984. has a performance by midnight oil and is an australian ww3/nukekino imo.
trailer: https://youtu.be/gMy45HKk7HQ?si=DleT-qbCoMu0Q-tD
can still download/watch on archive:
https://archive.org/details/one-night-stand-1984
These Final Hours
this was an interesting modern take on the end of the world. the main actor looked a bit moronic though
I thought the degradation of language thing was cheesy until I realized that's already happening irl and the apocalypse hasn't even happened yet. Incredibly realistic film.
Yes, expect a lot of morons running around wearing football wear larping as romans and drinking cheap vodka and squatting on the floor with yugos SKS
Why don't the tyres on the bus or car explode from the "EXTREME HEAT AND PRESSURE" from the nuke in that old time video footage?
No, because nukes aren't real
Nah this is back when people thought nuclear weapons just magically caused the weather to change instead of nuclear winter meaning the giant firestorms cause it which has been debunked since the gulf wars now anyway