>implying the color difference has anything to do with the disc format >implying ~~*roberto*~~ has any special knowledge about how the film is supposed to look >implying neutral, true to life color is always intended
maybe it is sand irritation, did you know the sand of tatooine is extra spiky like moon dust and gets everywhere, it's the worst part about tatooine, except that giant monster whose mouth is in the sand that eats you and keeps you alive for 1000 years while you remain in excruciating agony, star wars lore is fascinating stuff, huh
They did some destructive noise reduction, even back then there were algorithms to do it minimally with no human visible destruction during playback.
Nowadays we have AI solutions that remove 100% of the noise with 0% damage.
A tiny amount of blu-rays used very bad noise reduction that does not logically follow that all blu-ray releases suck since that would be a moronic statement and proven wrong b y a random sample.
You've been refuted and now it's time to leave Cinemaphile forever.
>The Phantom Menace was the final Star Wars film to be shot on 35mm film until The Force Awakens (2015). Some scenes, mostly of elements filmed by the special effects team, were shot on high definition digital video tapes to test the performance of digital recordings, which Lucas and McCallum considered the next logical step because of the amount of digitizing—an expensive process compared to recording directly on digital media—for the compositing of computer-generated effects. A couple of digitally shot scenes made it into the movie, one of them being of Qui-Gon taking a blood sample of Anakin Skywalker.
My bp is always normal, I'm just pale to the degree my skin is borderline translucent so any activity that gets the blood pumping turns me into a tomato
kek you're not wrong. I'm an Irishman and didn't realise OP was complaining about the top one until I read further down the thread cuz that's just the colour we go lol
Is this entire fricking site just post-ironic shitposting stupidity? Every single fricking board I go to is just morons drooling and shitting their pants constantly. If you think the top looks better, fricking say WHY.
I thought that was the case before I opened the thumbnail. Top is probably more true to the real colours, it's obviously a very bright and colourful room. Bottom is very washed out and desaturated.
Though, I think there is a middle ground between them which would look even better.
this is the trouble with blu-ray and 4k
it doesn't apply to ever single film
but for some reason a lot of them got fricking bogged by either the directors themselves or morons trying to "remaster" the film
like what is the point of the improved resolution fidelity and detail if you're just going to bog the picture
Top: Twilight time release from 2015 >beautiful lush green dreamlike countryside
Bottom: Criterion release personally supervised by Roger Deakins >sepia tone PISS
Because the people they hired are so far removed from the original that they are more focused on extracting detail than to keep the image consistent with the original intent.
(You)
Baskin Roberto’s cut is also probably color graded. It’s not just clarity
You enjoy the MCU colour grading too? kek
No. I just prefer not to look at pink skin
jej
Not crispy enough.
Better?
prìmo
too crusty for my taste
OP IS A homosexual AND GET WRECKED HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHA GE T FRICKED
I NEED TO SEE HIS FRICKING PORESSS AHHH
>implying the color difference has anything to do with the disc format
>implying ~~*roberto*~~ has any special knowledge about how the film is supposed to look
>implying neutral, true to life color is always intended
>why isn't qui-gon purple
>make him purple
>implying the issue is color difference and not clarity
Lol this guy is blind
Sometimes color difference causes small details to become virtually invisible though the pixels are still there.
dial the contrarianism down a bit anon
why is he red
becuz Anakin's girlfriend is awesome.
Liam Neeson had a high fat high salt inflammatory diet because and was a bit out of shape because it was the 90s
how autistic does on have to be to notice this?
Normal looking people are not pink. Very easy to notice.
holy kek
They're technically aliens
isnt there a desert planet in the movie? maybe he got a sunburn
maybe it is sand irritation, did you know the sand of tatooine is extra spiky like moon dust and gets everywhere, it's the worst part about tatooine, except that giant monster whose mouth is in the sand that eats you and keeps you alive for 1000 years while you remain in excruciating agony, star wars lore is fascinating stuff, huh
Ever heard about lighting?
Aurora borealis?
That's not the same. It's well known that some movies on bluray look inferior to older versions due to different color grading and DNR. It's dumb.
My butthole is pink
Have you seen a white person in your life?
we call them white people
Have you? White people aren’t pink either wtf
High test people are pink
Low test are pasty white
drunk pigskin trailer trash detected
Who ees roberto?
el que te dejo el culo abierto
REKT
Roberto el que a tu vieja le deja el coño abierto
Cinéma Roberto
>B-b-but 4K HD physical! I can watch Phantom Menace in my bunker after the zombie apocalypse.
They did some destructive noise reduction, even back then there were algorithms to do it minimally with no human visible destruction during playback.
Nowadays we have AI solutions that remove 100% of the noise with 0% damage.
>2024
>OP doesn't recalibrate his chromakey before every kino viewing
>Is called Le Blue-ray
>Is le pink instead
A tiny amount of blu-rays used very bad noise reduction that does not logically follow that all blu-ray releases suck since that would be a moronic statement and proven wrong b y a random sample.
You've been refuted and now it's time to leave Cinemaphile forever.
bruh, tpm was filmed on a digital camera at 1080p.
>The Phantom Menace was the final Star Wars film to be shot on 35mm film until The Force Awakens (2015). Some scenes, mostly of elements filmed by the special effects team, were shot on high definition digital video tapes to test the performance of digital recordings, which Lucas and McCallum considered the next logical step because of the amount of digitizing—an expensive process compared to recording directly on digital media—for the compositing of computer-generated effects. A couple of digitally shot scenes made it into the movie, one of them being of Qui-Gon taking a blood sample of Anakin Skywalker.
No that was Episode II
Episode I was shot on film
Blu Ray is made to sell action figures
We know George
The format is fine, it's bad transfers that's the problem. This looks like it has dnr which is stupid. DNR removes detail.
Top is more accurate, I know this being an Irish pink skin peasant myself
You must have high bp.
My bp is always normal, I'm just pale to the degree my skin is borderline translucent so any activity that gets the blood pumping turns me into a tomato
Who the hell is Roberto
>Disfrute de la película, Anon!
i voy a desfrutar sua daugther cholo wienersucker
>posts 240p example
Top: Typical irishman under studio lights
Bottom: Roberto made him Latinx
kek you're not wrong. I'm an Irishman and didn't realise OP was complaining about the top one until I read further down the thread cuz that's just the colour we go lol
Is this entire fricking site just post-ironic shitposting stupidity? Every single fricking board I go to is just morons drooling and shitting their pants constantly. If you think the top looks better, fricking say WHY.
it looks good
MAD MAD MAD YOUR SO FRICKING MAD b***h MAD MAD MAD GOD YES HE GOT TROLLED SO FRICKING HARD MAD SAAARS YES PLEASE WE DID IT REDDIT LMFAO
top is gigachad
bottom is virgin
cry harder b***h boy
Currently watching it on blender. The colors look well. I dont know why you are so mad about it
>those colors
>look well
get better eyes
It would probably look better rendered in Cycles
>his kino emulates screenglare
you're joking with that aspect ratio right
watching it on blender
You're dealing with prequelgays, don't expect their reasoning to make sense
Pink = good
Blue = bad
paid shills
unpaid anons pretending to be paid shills
paid shills pretending to be unpaid anons pretending to be paid shills
and that's just the newbies, and not even including the oldgays who have been operating on 7+ layers of irony ever since their souls died in 2012.
Everywhere online is like that now
Even in real life I frequently see people dropping trow and other people kneeling down in public to eat their shit
It’s quite disturbing tbdesu
many such cases
bottom is better, also imagine watching movies older than the fricking sun kek
i really hate that boomer garbage keeps posting here, this is a zoomcahd site now, cope and seethe
I thought that was the case before I opened the thumbnail. Top is probably more true to the real colours, it's obviously a very bright and colourful room. Bottom is very washed out and desaturated.
Though, I think there is a middle ground between them which would look even better.
Shut the frick up fatass
Nah, look at the plants, way too green. And the chromatic aberration on the people and the window on the right. It's extreme.
>I think there is a middle ground between them which would look even better.
Suspira's color palette was deliberately garish and harsh.
Just increase the saturation and wallah
>wallah
>walltah
for me, it's the 1080p webrip watched on a laptop screen in bed
this is the trouble with blu-ray and 4k
it doesn't apply to ever single film
but for some reason a lot of them got fricking bogged by either the directors themselves or morons trying to "remaster" the film
like what is the point of the improved resolution fidelity and detail if you're just going to bog the picture
>I have no life and I must complain!
>go from 1080p tv to 4k
>everything looks fricking horrible
why is everyone buying into this shit, movies look so weird like a stage play
Holy shit. You're a fricking moron. Get better hardware, or better genes. I only watch movies on a $1000 4k player and a $5000 tv.
Top: Twilight time release from 2015
>beautiful lush green dreamlike countryside
Bottom: Criterion release personally supervised by Roger Deakins
>sepia tone PISS
>blu-ray absolutely SUCKS
That's like saying blowjobs suck because you only get your from your father who uses his teeth, homosexual
Sharper doesn't mean better.
A 35mm version of the Prequels would be pure kino.
only the phantom menace was shot on film. There's a 35mm print somewhere on the internet and it looks pretty good
attack of the clones and revenge of the sith were shot on early digital cameras, which is why they're so ugly and permanently stuck in 1080p
>attack of the clones and revenge of the sith were shot on early digital cameras
Is there a way to emulate a 35mm film?
AotC will have a nice 35m scan in the near future. RotS is stuck with a shitty print.
Why are the blu-rays so ugly?
Because the people they hired are so far removed from the original that they are more focused on extracting detail than to keep the image consistent with the original intent.
Hollywood is full of idiots.
Hollywood thinks the magenta tinge is too 90s. They prefer the edgy blues and greens over the magenta SOUL.
incompetence but also might be intentional sabotage to make new shit stand out more
I like the DVD more than the theatrical here
it looks clearer and still remains warm but it lacks that dreamy mystical look from the theatrical
the original blu-ray doesn't look nearly as washed out as the crappy 4k remaster
Why is he seething in the Blu-Ray version?
"Roberto's Cut" isn't a media format I'm familiar with. So this picture is comparing Blu-ray versus who even knows what.