Yes. We went from kitty hawk to the moon in one human lifetime. It will absolutely be possible to create our own dinosaurs in the future.
No because only God can make a life
*removes fedora*
I cannot wait for people like you to be resolutely BTFO when humanity possesses the ability to not only create life but to also resurrect it after its natural death. Soon death will be perceived as a temporary inconvenience and you could die of a heart attack far from a hospital, be brought to one anyways, and be brought back to life thereby excluding permanently any concept of an afterlife or spiritual existence beyond the physical
No. Even if you ignore the difficulty in trying to obtain some kind of material from fossilized bones or insects - most successful attempts at extracting genetic material from old remains indicate the half-life of DNA is measured in centuries, not millenia or eons. There'll be almost nothing left after this much time. Even being able to recover enough information to clone something recently extinct like the moa or Haast's eagle would be a feat.
A faithful adaptation with gigachad lawyer and Muldoon surviving would be kino. The raptors are a lot cooler too, and the raft trex scene sounds like campy kino
This. The movie rapes the book. The book has annoying characters who by the end act like dumb action movie characters and the best scenes aren't even dinosaurs but long chapters where the characters are just talking about science and technology and stuff. Those are good.
The book is mediocre outside of a handful of good dino horror scenes like Nedry and Hammond's deaths. It spends way too much time wallowing in Crichton's philosophizing about chaos theory and sniffing his own farts about it. The Lost World is even worse. And both books have terrible endings. JP peters out during its third act and TLW doesn't even really have a proper climax it just sort of stops (I remember the first time I read it I thought I must have misplaced my bookmark and skipped several chapters)
We neer a proper sequel >we see Nedry with an eye patch and cybernetic enhancements >"I'm here for my revenge....DAD!" >camera pans slowly to reveal the brain of Hammond in a jar voiced by Bob Odenkirk with a British accent >the jar is slowly lowered into the body of a T-Rex with gorilla arms >"as you can see...I spared no expense " >JURASSIC WORLD:REVENGEANCE
There's only really two problems with Spielberg's adaptation. Only one can be fixed >Hammond's characterization
Making Hammond le whimsical grandpa is at odds with the thing Jurassic Park is fundamentally about. This can be fixed pretty easily by reading the book with a functioning brain. >Scale of the park severely downscaled
What Jurassic Park is in the books is much bigger and much more finished. Spielberg cut it way down to make filming with more practical effects viable. You "fix" this by shitting out something that looks like Jurassic World, just a bunch of garbage cgi making it an uncanny videogame. You can't really fix this. Not in modern hollywood at least. Never gonna happen.
Overall I don't think a remake is justified because it can't be fixed. A lot of the thing's that weren't in JP1 got lifted and put into JP2 and JP3. And we've already seen what modern Hollywood would do with the island trekking at a bigger scale with World. It's not worth it.
They should remake it at this point. There are so many bad versions of JP it doesn’t matter.
that would be monumentally worse than any of the new shit they've put out.
The humans were the real monsters all along!
Thats not what they say at all
Needs to be R rated which they won't do because of the budget.
James Cameron wanted to do a rated R version
Spielberg got the rights first though
It would have sucked. Introducing CGI dinosaurs to the public with Spielbergian wonder was the right call
R rated movies with prominent child characters are always a bad idea.
dumb platitude
Nedry describing how his intestines hit the floor was something else.
The book has several brutal kill scenes.
>several
Three, it has three. Regis, Nedry, Hammond.
https://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-dennis-nedry-death-book-change-guts/
How about you all shut the frick up
There's six movies but only the first movie is good, I haven't read the book
The film is far superior art to the original novel.
Annoying child characters and all?
That’s Kirsten Dunst and she wasn’t in JP
Book girl is really fricking annoying.
>Book girl is really fricking annoying.
Isn't this, in fact, cute?
Will it ever be possible to clone dinosaurs?
No because only God can make a life
Yes. We went from kitty hawk to the moon in one human lifetime. It will absolutely be possible to create our own dinosaurs in the future.
*removes fedora*
I cannot wait for people like you to be resolutely BTFO when humanity possesses the ability to not only create life but to also resurrect it after its natural death. Soon death will be perceived as a temporary inconvenience and you could die of a heart attack far from a hospital, be brought to one anyways, and be brought back to life thereby excluding permanently any concept of an afterlife or spiritual existence beyond the physical
this is Cinemaphile, not the rick and morty subreddit you fricking homosexual
I'm doing it right now.
Anon, you're just jerking off to dinosaurs.
No. Even if you ignore the difficulty in trying to obtain some kind of material from fossilized bones or insects - most successful attempts at extracting genetic material from old remains indicate the half-life of DNA is measured in centuries, not millenia or eons. There'll be almost nothing left after this much time. Even being able to recover enough information to clone something recently extinct like the moa or Haast's eagle would be a feat.
Its time to admit the first Jurassic p
Park is kind of overrated
It's a 10/10 film and you're a midwit
zoom zoom
Good luck with that.
No one would ever want to do a horror version of the story. It is too deep-rooted in being a kiddie series to sell toys.
It would be like trying to make TMNT like the Mirage comics where the turtles Jill people.
A faithful adaptation with gigachad lawyer and Muldoon surviving would be kino. The raptors are a lot cooler too, and the raft trex scene sounds like campy kino
>and the raft trex scene sounds like campy kino
They turned this one into an actual ride.
Yeah I loved the Type A big money lawyer Genarro from the book, and loved the scenes with him broing around with Muldoon.
movie>book
low IQ post
>bruh, fractals!
This. The movie rapes the book. The book has annoying characters who by the end act like dumb action movie characters and the best scenes aren't even dinosaurs but long chapters where the characters are just talking about science and technology and stuff. Those are good.
>by the end act like dumb action movie characters
lol
And it got one. One that's even better than the book. Or do you only want to see NC-17 level of gore? There arr movies that can satisfy you then.
The book is mediocre outside of a handful of good dino horror scenes like Nedry and Hammond's deaths. It spends way too much time wallowing in Crichton's philosophizing about chaos theory and sniffing his own farts about it. The Lost World is even worse. And both books have terrible endings. JP peters out during its third act and TLW doesn't even really have a proper climax it just sort of stops (I remember the first time I read it I thought I must have misplaced my bookmark and skipped several chapters)
Alcoholic Muldoon firing LAW rockets at raptors.
The whole segmented nervous system thing was cool.
Anyone have the quote where Malcolm predicts the dumbing down of humanity via social media?
found it
This ignores that small isolated populations also tend to fricking death spiral evolution-wise. You need a happy medium.
For me it's the terminally angry and infection prone mini elephant with super speed.
We neer a proper sequel
>we see Nedry with an eye patch and cybernetic enhancements
>"I'm here for my revenge....DAD!"
>camera pans slowly to reveal the brain of Hammond in a jar voiced by Bob Odenkirk with a British accent
>the jar is slowly lowered into the body of a T-Rex with gorilla arms
>"as you can see...I spared no expense "
>JURASSIC WORLD:REVENGEANCE
What did dinos taste like, bros? Chicken?
What is the film missing? You really need more gore? The film gets the same message across but it does in a way more conductive to cinema.
Honestly deviating from the book so much is exactly why it's a great film.
It really doesn't.
There's only really two problems with Spielberg's adaptation. Only one can be fixed
>Hammond's characterization
Making Hammond le whimsical grandpa is at odds with the thing Jurassic Park is fundamentally about. This can be fixed pretty easily by reading the book with a functioning brain.
>Scale of the park severely downscaled
What Jurassic Park is in the books is much bigger and much more finished. Spielberg cut it way down to make filming with more practical effects viable. You "fix" this by shitting out something that looks like Jurassic World, just a bunch of garbage cgi making it an uncanny videogame. You can't really fix this. Not in modern hollywood at least. Never gonna happen.
Overall I don't think a remake is justified because it can't be fixed. A lot of the thing's that weren't in JP1 got lifted and put into JP2 and JP3. And we've already seen what modern Hollywood would do with the island trekking at a bigger scale with World. It's not worth it.
Very odd post. Just a weird amount of cope