Just rewatched this and it’s still so bad. It just races through scenes that are basically just like a sparknotes summary of what the story is. Tomino just needs to slow it all down
Just rewatched this and its still so bad.
Just rewatched this and it’s still so bad. It just races through scenes that are basically just like a sparknotes summary of what the story is. Tomino just needs to slow it all down
Pay attention.
I did. Still bad.
Pretty much what I felt. Was like an abridged version of 2 or 3 movies. Reminds me of the 1st part of Evangelion 1.11 except it's the whole movie
OP Shut the frick up
Cry harder, fanboy.
Cope harder, anti fangirl
It's /m/'s sacred cow.
They will defend no shading, bad pacing, dumb plot ignoring the entirety of Z and ZZ, as well as poor animation and technical issues that shouldn't be acceptable for a theatrical release.
>no shading
Instant indicator someone didn't watch it.
Nothing you posted here is remotely true. Cry harder.
True. It's embarrassing to release this trash alongside Akira
CCA is better than Akira.
How? It looks like shit compared to Akira.
CCA has its moments sometimes
It's the most well animated mecha film at least. Akira had 5 years of production, CCA had less than a year, so not a very fair comparison.
"Certainly animation work had been initiated as early as possible; but if it could only start in earnest in July or August, that’s an incredibly tight schedule – 8 months at best – to animate a movie that was probably completed by the end of February 1988 at the latest."
https://animetudes.com/2021/11/26/the-animation-of-chars-counterattack/
F91 is on par, is it not? But yes, CCA is gorgeous.
F91 kind of loses steam halfway through and has some more questionable stuff come up. And it doesn't have the same quality of character animation at all, either in terms of acting choices or draftsmanship, which is probably the biggest factor. CCA has Umetsu solo animate all of sweetwater, to give example and it's really high tiered stuff, F91 doesn't really have anything like that. It has some mecha scenes that are on par with CCA, but CCA just has so much top tiered mecha animation spread throughout, layouts, effects and timing are consistently executed at a higher level imo.
Ah. Maybe I should rewatch those two movies then. Now that I think about it, I don't remember any human scenes in F91 besides the chaos at the beginning.
F91 loses steam in the sense the middle is the exact fever dream you would need a middle for what it was supposed to be, and long protracted engagement inside of a colony.
Hello sir!
>It's the most well animated mecha film at least.
It's not even the best animated Gundam movie, let alone best animated mecha movie
this animation is shit though
Didn't cca have 10 animation directors? What was that about?
Incompetence, Miyazaki movies don't even have that many animation directors and they are visually flawless.
>Incompetence
KEK, do you even know what an animaton director does?
Take your meds, moron. Simple as.
That’s because he runs a slave operation and beats his employees to a pulp unless they draw the perfect generic Japan countryside hills
Shit that never happened.
Akira was made in a year
You know nothing of film production.
Akira was made in a year and 3 months
This looks like TV movie. Why is the cel size so small? You can see the xerox lines like a mid 80s tv anime
How can you tell the cel size?, and can you screenshot the "xerox lines"? - not sure what you are on about here.
As far as Gundam goes. If you really love Yas than maybe Encounters, I can't think of another Gundam film that comes close, the 00 film has boring timing and is devoid of good character animation, F91 has lots of issues as mentioned, Hathaway has tons of melting uncanny valley character animation. The rest are just compiled OVAs and TV shows or not worth considering and it shows.
You can tell the cel size by the line thickness and how the drawings light weights shift very obviously between frames. Now compare to a Ghibli movie, or Ghost in the Shell, or Akira all of which uses large cels and doesn't have this issue, they are so clear they look digital.
Cool, I'll look into that and confirm veracity.
Otomo started gathering funds and staff directly after Genma Taisen 1983 afaik, I've never heard of it being made in a year.
No, the three dimensionality of the layouts, intricacy of the effects work, and the timing of the motions, are all exceptionally high quality.
FSS had 8 where CCA had 11. Seems like a bit of a trend for Sunrise, as some other of their films at the time had 5-6. CCA has some of the ADs doing long sections of KA for the movie as well, like Mitsuo Iso, Atsushi Shigeta and Yoshinobu Inano, so not sure exactly how the pipeline worked. In Oomori's case he ensured that the beam effects stuck to the consistently nuanced physics they worked out ahead of time, and Kitazume kept the characters drawings looking pristine with only Umetsu's scenes being untouched I believe.
https://k.mandarake.co.jp/auction/item/itemInfoEn.html?index=666609
CCA cels are 300x380mm so 30x38cm, was shot in 4:3 then cropped.
Totoro cels are 23 x 35.2cm
https://www.artnet.com/artists/studio-ghibli/animation-cel-from-my-neighbor-totoro-TXdWAWYY6GY_SFOspKxlIA2
Neither of those scenes have notable cel flickering though. There is more paint bleed over the lines than in those films though + the bad DNR scrubbing away a fair amount.
Not sure how it ignores Z and ZZ when Axis being in the hands of the EF is something that explicitly happens at the end of ZZ
>CCA is...bad! posting
>filtered
I've been married since 2017. My spouse hates CCA but I love it. Should we divorce?
I'm starting to think CCA just filters midwits.
It really truly does. CCA is not even that difficult of a film to grasp, and all their complaints is always shallow.
only midwits like it
Imao, so anno, oshii, and ikuhara are midwits? Only geniuses like it then.
Those are the holy trinity of midwit anime
Why do you third world posters always predictably deflect?
#
It's not difficult at all to follow, it's difficult for those who purposely cloud themselves with misconceptions and can't ever see the forest for the trees. They're constantly applying meaning to what isn't there and don't actually pay attention to director and writer characteristics. In short, they take part in this genre but don't actually enjoy it because they're not invested in any meaningful sense, they latched on through something arbitrary and are constantly wondering why the film that wasn't made for them isn't impressing them.
Why do these ppl come from? I have to wonder. Was it through netflix? Wasn't /m/ or Cinemaphile always filled with speed watchers?
They are third world posters anon. You didn’t realize that more and more of them started showing up as more of the world got internet access?
I agree that america is third world but I think they already had internet.
>america is third world
Mate, are you from a third world country?
I just wish these frickers had their own dog water anime website to shit post.
>doesn’t have an argument
>m-midwits!
Kek every time. Movie is mid.
Your internet connection runs on dial up, that's why you can't watch it.
>midwits think there is anything to "get" about Turd's CounterattACK
lel
A "midwit" would simply be unable to counter argument with dignity when presented with good faith arguments, but instead just throw stones.
The people who hate CCA are the same people that think Unicorn is a masterpiece. They should never be listened to