Do we have any evidence in the film that the Pocahontas tribe scalp people? and don't say do Native Americans because that was not done by every Native American stuff like that was pretty tribe specific.
I know some Native Americans did it in real life but not every tribe did it like racist wants you to believe.
And considering how limited those people in the movies watching native peoples if it didn't happen in that local area they probably wouldn't even know of it being a thing whatsoever.
You think other countries have claimed that land at certain points before the United States has no guilt in the lands they took from Native Americans at the point it belongs to the United States and they just went in stolen from Native Americans who they previously signed International agreement saying Native American own. that land themselves?
Breaking International treaties even after signing you will not do so with the United Nations to this day.. you also acting like they will never capable of Defending themselves look at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
You native simps make me smile. They fought and died and lost their lands like everyone does. I never see you cucks whine about the ottomans when it comes to imperialism.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That does not mean they lost the battle of the Little Bighorn despite how much of a spin the United States government wanted to put on it.And what makes you think I don't know anything or even care about imperialism of the Ottoman Empire why even Islamic attempts at imperialism up Islamic law to this day?
If an arsonist burned your house down would you be like "Ah! Well, it's my fault for letting him." ? Cuck mindset, absolutely inhuman zero-empathy bug behavior.
>zero empathy
Funny you say that because I am sure the natives were pure saints right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are strawmanning
2 years ago
Anonymous
They were not going to European countries trying to wipe out the white man in order to make them their slaves and take over white man's countrys. Why does somebody have to be a complete humanitarian saint for you to condemn violence against them?
2 years ago
Anonymous
No you silly troony, they didn't have ships.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Actually they did have ships, just not ocean-going vessels.All so that means they were no danger to the white man has a hole so why did the white man need to do anything so dangerous to the native peoples existence?
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, they did not have ships. They had canoes. moronic troony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Why does somebody have to be a complete humanitarian saint for you to condemn violence against them?
This is how it works, someone dies and you have to go through their facebook and twitter posts to retroactively show they deserved to get killed
>Heh, might makes right minorities. We fought for this land fair and square. >NOOOOOOOOOOO MUH HECKIN WHITERINO RACE STATS I DONT WANNA BE A MINORITY PLEASE JUST HAVE MORE WHITE BABIES SAVE ME JESUS I CANT BREED
They were not going to European countries trying to wipe out the white man in order to make them their slaves and take over white man's countrys. Why does somebody have to be a complete humanitarian saint for you to condemn violence against them?
Actually they did have ships, just not ocean-going vessels.All so that means they were no danger to the white man has a hole so why did the white man need to do anything so dangerous to the native peoples existence?
>The Poor hecking natives they were just minding their business.
The World was a very violent place before the modern times, you sheltered manchildren, Tribes, nations and Empire rose and fell on the tip of the sword.
You can feel pity for the natives and their loss of land, but to try and pain their conquest as anything unique is naive. The Natives were happily butchering each other with Arrow, Axe and spear, and eventually gun. The Europeans simply took part in a game they had a thousand years head start in.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Did you deliberately leave out bows and arrows? Because you think that would make them to technologically advanced? And why do you think people need to think it's has to be you need to do them in history in order to feel sympathy for them? And it wasn't simple conquest of a neighbouring country it was delete genocide and constant treaty violation from one culture to another and in the end they decided if we're going to let them live we're going to make them as European as possible destroying healthy functional Native American societies in order to make them the worst kind of white trash and act like it's better because now they're more European, Talking about the First Nation boarded schools which University became completely abusive and messed up anyone who went to them for generation.
As a Native I always found the whole noble savage thing whites painted us as with our tribes all being peaceful before whitey came hilarious, when in reality we were warring and killing each other long before they showed up.
It’s even funnier when you learn the real historical thing with Pocahontas was how her father and the Powhatan tribe stole a shitload of guns to massacre his enemy tribes with because he fricking loved guns, a true American he was.
Everyone here fine with killing natives for their land is also fine with Russia btfoing Ukraine and taking it too right? Too many Ukrooners on /misc/ so I'm trying to gage this here/
I'm fine with it. 80% of people didn't know or care about the Ukraine to begin with. They only care care now cause they want to support the underdog against the big, scary, evil, Russia. God I hate Ukraine simps
based
[...]
People are supporting Ukraine because it was unprovoked invaded by a neighboring country with war crimes being committed against its people with impunity..And why is knowing exactly where it's located beforehand even considered important to if we should have sympathy for innocent people are not?
How many other countries went through the exact same thing and got no support? Only matters if its a ZOG
>How many other countries went through the exact same thing and got no support? Only matters if its a ZOG
Can you give an example of an unprovoked invasion with no country got sympathy or support in the last 20 years?
You mean like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria, Somalia, or Yemen?
>You mean like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria, Somalia, or Yemen?
Iraq, Afghanistan. 911 and what fuse all to cooperate with the UN weapons inspectors those were not unprovoked I'm not a hundred percent sure on the last 2 but that does not mean we should not be sympathetic to Ukraine and Syria was a Civil War not an invasion and also another reason why we shouldn't let Putin get away with what it's doing now.
I'm fine with it. 80% of people didn't know or care about the Ukraine to begin with. They only care care now cause they want to support the underdog against the big, scary, evil, Russia. God I hate Ukraine simps
I'm fine with it. 80% of people didn't know or care about the Ukraine to begin with. They only care care now cause they want to support the underdog against the big, scary, evil, Russia. God I hate Ukraine simps
People are supporting Ukraine because it was unprovoked invaded by a neighboring country with war crimes being committed against its people with impunity..And why is knowing exactly where it's located beforehand even considered important to if we should have sympathy for innocent people are not?
I'm perfectly fine with it, what annoys me is how we are paying and supporting Ukraine with weapons and supplies to basically be a proxy war against Russia and yet they keep begging for more money and shit, if it wasn't for NATO propping them up Russia would have steamrolled those Pierogi-Black folk in a week.
Because just happened NATO help in Vietnam and Iraq so much all the way they got Concord extremely way more easily than Ukraine did a few weeks after the u.s. military leave. Also not proxy war with Russia when Russia itself is actually invade in clear as day with no justification . And not allowing Putin to take over Ukraine is in NATO and the United States and Europe and basically the entire free world's interest because after 1 it be another and another and another Country like with Hitler. And just because of countries on your side doesn't mean you don't have legitimate complaints about them not making a full commitment or doing stuff impede the effort someone of your own Survival and stop acting like the u.s. is the victim when Ukraine is fighting for survival .
Because the Inca and Aztec Empires were weak because they did not have the wheel? Also they had multiple form written just did not involve alphabet letters .And it's not like white people found themselves immune to all disease is everywhere they went to like when they first went to India.
>And it's not like white people found themselves immune to all disease is everywhere they went to like when they first went to India.
It was an exchange with Native Americans. We gave them influenza and they gave us syphillis that they got from camels.
Camels pussies are the only natural reservoir and they were once widespread throught the Americas. The leading theory was that they went extinct dueto overhunting, but it appears they were actually fricked to death by injuns.
no b***hes
he's so... serious...
Reminder that Kocoum was right.
kocouinum
Women. Not even once.
>tried to kill the invader white man trying to cuck him
Absolutely none
firewater
a character that exists only to justify genocide as self defense
Maybe red homies shouldn't scalp dudes. Talk shit get hit.
Do we have any evidence in the film that the Pocahontas tribe scalp people? and don't say do Native Americans because that was not done by every Native American stuff like that was pretty tribe specific.
>in didn't happen in a children's animated film
>therefore ergo vis a vis it didn't happen
Brainlets, man...
I know some Native Americans did it in real life but not every tribe did it like racist wants you to believe.
And considering how limited those people in the movies watching native peoples if it didn't happen in that local area they probably wouldn't even know of it being a thing whatsoever.
The Powhatan did.
They were literally gonna bust open john Adams skull with a club for absolutely no reason.
>muh scalping
really homie
That's bullshit, some of that shit was Mexico.
You're calling the entire map invalid because some of that territory belongs to a country other than the United States? That feels like whataboutism.
You think other countries have claimed that land at certain points before the United States has no guilt in the lands they took from Native Americans at the point it belongs to the United States and they just went in stolen from Native Americans who they previously signed International agreement saying Native American own. that land themselves?
Everything in America is stolen.
>claim land
>can't defend it
Am I supposed to weep for warrior's who lost?
Breaking International treaties even after signing you will not do so with the United Nations to this day.. you also acting like they will never capable of Defending themselves look at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
You probably have brain damage anon. Please get checked out before it's too late.
>l-look at little big horn
You native simps make me smile. They fought and died and lost their lands like everyone does. I never see you cucks whine about the ottomans when it comes to imperialism.
That does not mean they lost the battle of the Little Bighorn despite how much of a spin the United States government wanted to put on it.And what makes you think I don't know anything or even care about imperialism of the Ottoman Empire why even Islamic attempts at imperialism up Islamic law to this day?
If an arsonist burned your house down would you be like "Ah! Well, it's my fault for letting him." ? Cuck mindset, absolutely inhuman zero-empathy bug behavior.
>zero empathy
Funny you say that because I am sure the natives were pure saints right?
You are strawmanning
They were not going to European countries trying to wipe out the white man in order to make them their slaves and take over white man's countrys. Why does somebody have to be a complete humanitarian saint for you to condemn violence against them?
No you silly troony, they didn't have ships.
Actually they did have ships, just not ocean-going vessels.All so that means they were no danger to the white man has a hole so why did the white man need to do anything so dangerous to the native peoples existence?
No, they did not have ships. They had canoes. moronic troony.
>Why does somebody have to be a complete humanitarian saint for you to condemn violence against them?
This is how it works, someone dies and you have to go through their facebook and twitter posts to retroactively show they deserved to get killed
>not installing fire suppression measures
>not fortifying your home
>not being armed
>not having situational awareness
Neither of you two are going to make it.
>Heh, might makes right minorities. We fought for this land fair and square.
>NOOOOOOOOOOO MUH HECKIN WHITERINO RACE STATS I DONT WANNA BE A MINORITY PLEASE JUST HAVE MORE WHITE BABIES SAVE ME JESUS I CANT BREED
>The Poor hecking natives they were just minding their business.
The World was a very violent place before the modern times, you sheltered manchildren, Tribes, nations and Empire rose and fell on the tip of the sword.
You can feel pity for the natives and their loss of land, but to try and pain their conquest as anything unique is naive. The Natives were happily butchering each other with Arrow, Axe and spear, and eventually gun. The Europeans simply took part in a game they had a thousand years head start in.
Did you deliberately leave out bows and arrows? Because you think that would make them to technologically advanced? And why do you think people need to think it's has to be you need to do them in history in order to feel sympathy for them? And it wasn't simple conquest of a neighbouring country it was delete genocide and constant treaty violation from one culture to another and in the end they decided if we're going to let them live we're going to make them as European as possible destroying healthy functional Native American societies in order to make them the worst kind of white trash and act like it's better because now they're more European, Talking about the First Nation boarded schools which University became completely abusive and messed up anyone who went to them for generation.
If you get mugged at gun point, it's not a crime, they rightfully conquered your wallet
so realistic then?
white men
BWC
Reminder women what guns banned because it lets a virgin like Thomas kill a Chad like Kocoum.
As a Native I always found the whole noble savage thing whites painted us as with our tribes all being peaceful before whitey came hilarious, when in reality we were warring and killing each other long before they showed up.
It’s even funnier when you learn the real historical thing with Pocahontas was how her father and the Powhatan tribe stole a shitload of guns to massacre his enemy tribes with because he fricking loved guns, a true American he was.
Unbelievably based.
He's a Kokoomer
Why is Christopher Columbus also hated by Native Americans despite never even landing in actual America?
Are you trying to say native peoples from the Caribbeans are aren't native Americans?
Well, they're Native Caribbeans, right?
And the Caribbean is in the Americas.
Everyone here fine with killing natives for their land is also fine with Russia btfoing Ukraine and taking it too right? Too many Ukrooners on /misc/ so I'm trying to gage this here/
Yeah I'm fine with two former Soviet countries killing each other. And Redditors.
based
How many other countries went through the exact same thing and got no support? Only matters if its a ZOG
>How many other countries went through the exact same thing and got no support? Only matters if its a ZOG
Can you give an example of an unprovoked invasion with no country got sympathy or support in the last 20 years?
>You mean like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria, Somalia, or Yemen?
Iraq, Afghanistan. 911 and what fuse all to cooperate with the UN weapons inspectors those were not unprovoked I'm not a hundred percent sure on the last 2 but that does not mean we should not be sympathetic to Ukraine and Syria was a Civil War not an invasion and also another reason why we shouldn't let Putin get away with what it's doing now.
I'm fine with it. 80% of people didn't know or care about the Ukraine to begin with. They only care care now cause they want to support the underdog against the big, scary, evil, Russia. God I hate Ukraine simps
People are supporting Ukraine because it was unprovoked invaded by a neighboring country with war crimes being committed against its people with impunity..And why is knowing exactly where it's located beforehand even considered important to if we should have sympathy for innocent people are not?
You mean like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria, Somalia, or Yemen?
>what about these brown countries though?
I'm perfectly fine with it, what annoys me is how we are paying and supporting Ukraine with weapons and supplies to basically be a proxy war against Russia and yet they keep begging for more money and shit, if it wasn't for NATO propping them up Russia would have steamrolled those Pierogi-Black folk in a week.
Because just happened NATO help in Vietnam and Iraq so much all the way they got Concord extremely way more easily than Ukraine did a few weeks after the u.s. military leave. Also not proxy war with Russia when Russia itself is actually invade in clear as day with no justification . And not allowing Putin to take over Ukraine is in NATO and the United States and Europe and basically the entire free world's interest because after 1 it be another and another and another Country like with Hitler. And just because of countries on your side doesn't mean you don't have legitimate complaints about them not making a full commitment or doing stuff impede the effort someone of your own Survival and stop acting like the u.s. is the victim when Ukraine is fighting for survival .
first time Disney killed a non villain human character
He does not owe you a smile, Pocahontas.
Too many white men on his land
I think he's an ignorant savage.
He was right about everything
So that’s where Mike Judge got the idea from?
Underrated
Any group would be dangerous to you if after thousands of years you couldn't even invent the wheel or written language, or killed by a cough.
Because the Inca and Aztec Empires were weak because they did not have the wheel? Also they had multiple form written just did not involve alphabet letters .And it's not like white people found themselves immune to all disease is everywhere they went to like when they first went to India.
>And it's not like white people found themselves immune to all disease is everywhere they went to like when they first went to India.
It was an exchange with Native Americans. We gave them influenza and they gave us syphillis that they got from camels.
>syphilis from camels
But you can't even find native camels in the Americas
Camels pussies are the only natural reservoir and they were once widespread throught the Americas. The leading theory was that they went extinct dueto overhunting, but it appears they were actually fricked to death by injuns.