>he thinks his defamation means anything in the face of the church God himself established
7 months ago
Anonymous
>he's confusing catholics with mormons
lol. lmao even.
7 months ago
Anonymous
stay mad
7 months ago
Anonymous
i accept your concession
7 months ago
Anonymous
Thank you for acknowledging that the Catholic Church is the one established by God, and thank you for denouncing mormonism and all its evils.
7 months ago
Anonymous
i look forward to laughing at you from heaven as peter turns you away for being an idolitor
7 months ago
Anonymous
Said a great number of heretics now burning in hell, I know.
7 months ago
Anonymous
how would you know unless you came from hell, heathen? >You shall not make for yourself an idol or a likeness of anything in the heavens above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the earth
and yet you make idols of mary and offer her your prayers. begone from this place foul spawn of satan
7 months ago
Anonymous
>how would you know unless you came from hell, heathen?
I would know because these things, such as mormonism, are condemned by the church of God on earth. Thus, in the same way I know that all the saints are in Heaven, I know which things may condemn me to hell. >idolatry
this cope is eons old and wasn't true then or now. It is eisegesis, not true exegesis. >A graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing All such images or likenesses, are forbidden by this commandment, as are made to be adored and served; according to that which immediately follows, thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them. That is, all such as are designed for idols or image gods, or are worshipped with divine honour. But otherwise images, pictures, or representations, even in the house of God, and in the very sanctuary, so far from being forbidden are expressly authorized by the word of God. See Exodus xxv. 15; chap. xxxviii. 7; Numbers xxi. 8, 9; 1 Chronicles xxviii. 18, 19; 2 Chronicles iii. 10. (Challoner)
7 months ago
Anonymous
ten commandment > some exception clause pencilled in by a satanic cult
7 months ago
Anonymous
>trips confirm god hates catholics
7 months ago
Anonymous
>the statement of the church of God on the very text you only know about because we compiled it into the vulgate >>> your personal feelings on the matter
>trips confirm god hates catholics
>ur an idol worshipper >these magic numbers r proof of my point btw 🙂
lol
7 months ago
Anonymous
>magic numbers
if you weren't such a godless heathen you'd know that god works in mysterious ways. you are going to spent eternity in hell, but keep on blaspheming like this and surely you'll roast on only the hottest flames of hell fire. but i forgive you and ask you repent for your sins. seek forgiveness from the lord before it is too late to save your soul.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>if you weren't such a heathen you'd be superstitious like me
7 months ago
Anonymous
get thee behind me satan
7 months ago
Anonymous
>he says after taking le magic numbers as a sign from God rather than the exegesis of the church that God himself created for your sake
7 months ago
Anonymous
You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons.
7 months ago
Anonymous
You're completely right. That's why I don't pretend to believe in God while in actuality publicly confessing to believing in magic repeating digits.
The only thing you have are your personal platitudes which you repeat to yourself, rather than the teachings of teachers who were given their power to teach, rule, and sanctify by God.
7 months ago
Anonymous
I also forgive you. And what I have forgiven, if there was anything to forgive, I have forgiven in the sight of Christ for your sake, in order that Satan might not outwit us. For we are not unaware of his schemes. >go and seek the light friend and peace be with you
7 months ago
Anonymous
Jesus Christ only established one church, my friend...
7 months ago
Anonymous
Go attempt to take part in any random catholic communion (even as a christian) you'd be denied such grace. I'm glad jesus didn't act or think in such ways to the thief on the cross otherwise it'd destroy all tenants of it's religion.
It depends on which one you're talking about doofus. Also why does everyone like to bring this shit up constantly and never mentions Islamic conquest and taking euros and others as slaves and even eunuchs. Seems awfully israelitey to me
Starting from Muhammad's death until very recently actually. Even the US had to send ships to stop them taking slaves and fricking shit up. Just odd how history is taught so one sided, must be because Ghislaine Maxwells dad merged with McGraw Hill and wrote all our history books, what a weird coincidence eh?
Lol yeah thats another example of the one-sidedness. If I'm not mistaken that term was coined by israelites and isn't taken seriously by anyone who's familiar with European history. Despite all that I still like the movie.
>killed a bunch of israelites in the rhine for no reason
"A israelite will always tell you WHAT happened to him but never WHY."
-ancient proverb from multiple cultures throughout human history
Hardly, the first crusade was absolutely necessary and was a justified defense against an existential threat to Christendom and Europe as a whole. The past couple centuries at that point Islam had been encroaching further and further into Europe beyond modern day turkey and had even invaded lower Spain. Even with their dominance in the area Islamists did nothing to make the greater Mediterranean sea safe to travel making commerce in Europe suffer. They got what was coming to them.
dogshit movie honestly
not only anticatholic but the whole thing is a poorly directed nothingburger
though that would describe almost every ridley scott movie now :
>it's shit >it's a nothingburger
sorry, pajeet, those aren't arguments
kek cope
7 months ago
Anonymous
>nonwhite projecting
lmfao seethe
7 months ago
Anonymous
>nonwhite projecting
I know you are, you already conceded that you made no argument when it was pointed out, Raj
lol, lmao even
7 months ago
Anonymous
>N-NO I
holy cope
>dogshit movie honestly
Not an argument. It's a good movie honestly. >not only anticatholic but the whole thing is a poorly directed nothingburger
Catholics are shit-tier, but a lot happens in the film meaning it's not a nothingburger. You were filtered. >though that would describe almost every ridley scott movie now :
Not an argument, you've been filtered hard.
Why can't non-whites understand films by whites?
>all this projection >"muh filtered"
lol I don't speak monkey, try rewording it when you speak to your white master. got that, boy?
7 months ago
Anonymous
>seething this hard
top kek
>Another Kingdom of Heaven thread
This is the fourth one I've seen since I started keeping track yesterday.
Anyway, I watched both of these documentaries off of youtube.
The Kings & Generals one is better produced, but I thought it was weird when he started talking about israelites and shit for like half an hour out of nowhere. The Real Crusades History guy is nicer in my opinion, despite leaving out all the battle info since he's just using royalty free stuff mostly. He paints the Crusaders in a relatively positive light overall, compared to the K&G one. Also he says CruSAYYYD which I think is funny. Has anyone else seen a weird uptick in Crusader media references even prior to this whole lame Gaza stuff, or am I the weird one?
>he started talking about israelites and shit for like half an hour out of nowhere
what was the context? their roles in the crusades? their victimhood?
7 months ago
Anonymous
How can non-whites ([...]) be filtered by this?
>still seething cause I shit on their Black personmonkey version of history
lmfao
7 months ago
Anonymous
>can’t cope with non having an argument
chimping out is in character for your type kek
7 months ago
Anonymous
I've literally got you and your friend chimping out over my based white power assessment of this shitty movie?
If it was wrong why did you reply both reply with so much seethe?
7 months ago
Anonymous
Black person gonna nig
I've literally got you and your friend chimping out over my based white power assessment of this shitty movie?
If it was wrong why did you reply both reply with so much seethe?
lmao blue eyed pepe won’t give you blue eyes, raj
7 months ago
Anonymous
All out of non-arguments, boy?
lmfao
meanwhile Olivier shits on Scott
7 months ago
Anonymous
>no counter arguments
lol
7 months ago
Anonymous
You'd have to present a counter-argument to begin with, boy
7 months ago
Anonymous
I actually did you just can't read since you're not white.
7 months ago
Anonymous
based
7 months ago
Anonymous
Golden shutdown.
Non-whites can’t understand mockery any more than they can arguments or movies lmao
7 months ago
Anonymous
I already said that line.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Golden shutdown.
7 months ago
Anonymous
it’s seething now lmao
7 months ago
Anonymous
Damn straight, Satan.
it's pure kino
The only shortcoming was not actually portraying the battle at Hattin. I wanted to see the last charges of the Templar on screen.
7 months ago
Anonymous
An offshoot of the People's Crusade where a bunch of Germs said 'eh, killing israelites that live nearby is good enough & cheaper. They killed Jesus + they're annoying, so they deserve it.' more or less.
7 months ago
Anonymous
Wacky Germans
European history is controversial for non-whites.
Tends to make them angry just seeing it.
>Tends to make them angry just seeing it.
Still seething that we brought them civilisation.
>dogshit movie honestly
Not an argument. It's a good movie honestly. >not only anticatholic but the whole thing is a poorly directed nothingburger
Catholics are shit-tier, but a lot happens in the film meaning it's not a nothingburger. You were filtered. >though that would describe almost every ridley scott movie now :
Not an argument, you've been filtered hard.
For starters Balian was almost 50 and was born in the holy land. He also didn’t romance Sybilla, he was married to her mom (or step mom, can’t rememeber). Saladin didn’t free every Christian, he only freed those who could afford ransom, and the rest were enslaved. And lastly Guy and Raynaud weren’t a rogue subverting King Baldwin. They were probably all in cahoots. The most accurate part was the Crusaders losing at Hattin due to overextending themselves. The two armies were more evenly matched despite the difference in size (~15k Christians vs. ~20k Muslims - not 200k like in the movie). When Lionheart crusaded a few years later he easily won every battle and retook basically all the coastal cities. Only reason he didn’t retake the city of Jerusalem was because he didn’t want to make the same mistake and overextend himself as it would have been an absolute bloodbath and coin flip sieging Jerusalem.
>N-NO I
holy cope
[...] >all this projection >"muh filtered"
lol I don't speak monkey, try rewording it when you speak to your white master. got that, boy?
>Non-whites can't even form cohesive arguments about why they don't like it kek
I think it's just some pajeet off /misc/ judging from all the filenames being fresh and the desire to be white despite hating whites.
>Another Kingdom of Heaven thread
This is the fourth one I've seen since I started keeping track yesterday.
Anyway, I watched both of these documentaries off of youtube.
The Kings & Generals one is better produced, but I thought it was weird when he started talking about israelites and shit for like half an hour out of nowhere. The Real Crusades History guy is nicer in my opinion, despite leaving out all the battle info since he's just using royalty free stuff mostly. He paints the Crusaders in a relatively positive light overall, compared to the K&G one. Also he says CruSAYYYD which I think is funny. Has anyone else seen a weird uptick in Crusader media references even prior to this whole lame Gaza stuff, or am I the weird one?
What movie do you think is good, and then what movie did you think the DC of KoH would live up to from how good people said it was? I think it's good, but I'd like to hear what you have to say.
Muslims >Launch Jihad after Jihad against Europe with the hopes of turning the land Islamic. >It was tradition for every new Muslim King to declare Jihad and wage war. >Engage in slave trade of not only blacks but white Christians. >This got so bad that living near the coast was considered a death sentence. >Muslims keep fricking around, enslaving and conquering Christian lands, slaughtering everyone who stood against them.
Christians >Christian Kingdoms finally are fed up and unite to drive the invaders back and to take Jerusalem as payback.
Muslims >"EVIL CRUSADERS JUST WANT TO SLAUGHTER US FOR NO REASON! WE DID NOTHING WRONG! ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE! CHRISTIANS ARE BLOOD THIRSTY MONSTERS!"
>When I was in my sixteenth Kingdom of Heaven thread, I made a great shitpost. I felt in that moment I would live to see a hundred threads. Now I know I shall not see thirty. None of us know our end, really, or what anon will guide us there. A janny may warn a man, a mod may ban an anon, but that anon can also move himself, and only then does that anon truly begin his own game. Remember that howsoever you are banned or by whom, your soul is in your keeping alone, even though those who presume to play you be jannies or men of power. When you stand before God, you cannot say, "I was filtered by Kingdom of Heaven," or that the christians were le bad guys. This will not suffice. Remember that.
No. Those were two separate contingents of the military. They just died out, anon. A lot of them just got old, and over time they were there to hang out mostly.
The crusaders during the first crusade seem like a bunch of buttholes who stumbled their way from Europe to Constantinople and then into Jerusalem and in spite of everything they manage to do it
I'd be cool to have a film about it
Only because they were not portrayed accurate to history. The movie actually made both Crusaders and Saracens much more noble than they were in reality, but were especially kind to the Saracens. Probably the most laughable thing about this movie is the way Saladin dealt with the Christians in Jerusalem. In reality he had intended to slaughter them all, but was only dissuaded from this when the Crusader who led the defense swore to kill every Muslim in the city and destroy every Mosque before the city fell. So Saladin did spare them... by enslaving over 15,000 men, women, and children.
>the Crusader who led the defense swore to kill every Muslim in the city and destroy every Mosque before the city fell. So Saladin did spare them... by enslaving over 15,000 men, women, and children.
Seems based of Saladin.
You cant get a kino crusade flick without that era's goyslop. Back then they were happy with just mocking or straight up shitting on christians while uplifting poc.
Pretty sure if created now we'd have the leader of templar be some brownoid and even more islamic ideas.
>steals the show in you’re path
I can’t find any videos or photos of Norton on set in costume or doing any interviews about this role. Was surprised to see his name in the credit roll
>Watch Kingdom of Heaven Theatrical version >Christianity bad >Watch Kingdom of Heaven Director's cut >Every religion has dickheads, also Christianity is literally real wtf
I mean the effect that Christianity had on the western world is interesting, but abrahamic religions are ultimately just memes considering Judaism itself which Christianity and Islam are based on is a syncretic religion that borrowed heavily from Egyptian, Canaanite and Sumerian myths.
El being the father of 60 lesser deities like Ba'al and Yahweh, Mose's covenant code being pretty much Hammurabi's code of law, and Noah's Ark pretty much cribbed from the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Most of the stories in the bible and talmud were written VERY recently historically speaking, within the last 2000 years, probably compiled by rabbis in Alexandria and borrows from preexisting stories of the ancient middle east.
yeah
>killed a bunch of israelites in the rhine for no reason
>killed basically any christian who wasn't catholic
the crusades wasn't "some noble quest to defend the holy land", it was the catholic church wanting to expand their influence
And the problem with this is...?
Catholics are the Black folk of whites and christians, they never accomplished anything of note and have always been abrasive c**ts
Catholicism IS Christianity
>he thinks a private equity company who's ceo title means "god on earth" is christianity
lol. lmao even.
>he thinks his defamation means anything in the face of the church God himself established
>he's confusing catholics with mormons
lol. lmao even.
stay mad
i accept your concession
Thank you for acknowledging that the Catholic Church is the one established by God, and thank you for denouncing mormonism and all its evils.
i look forward to laughing at you from heaven as peter turns you away for being an idolitor
Said a great number of heretics now burning in hell, I know.
how would you know unless you came from hell, heathen?
>You shall not make for yourself an idol or a likeness of anything in the heavens above or on the earth below or in the waters beneath the earth
and yet you make idols of mary and offer her your prayers. begone from this place foul spawn of satan
>how would you know unless you came from hell, heathen?
I would know because these things, such as mormonism, are condemned by the church of God on earth. Thus, in the same way I know that all the saints are in Heaven, I know which things may condemn me to hell.
>idolatry
this cope is eons old and wasn't true then or now. It is eisegesis, not true exegesis.
>A graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing All such images or likenesses, are forbidden by this commandment, as are made to be adored and served; according to that which immediately follows, thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them. That is, all such as are designed for idols or image gods, or are worshipped with divine honour. But otherwise images, pictures, or representations, even in the house of God, and in the very sanctuary, so far from being forbidden are expressly authorized by the word of God. See Exodus xxv. 15; chap. xxxviii. 7; Numbers xxi. 8, 9; 1 Chronicles xxviii. 18, 19; 2 Chronicles iii. 10. (Challoner)
ten commandment > some exception clause pencilled in by a satanic cult
>trips confirm god hates catholics
>the statement of the church of God on the very text you only know about because we compiled it into the vulgate >>> your personal feelings on the matter
>ur an idol worshipper
>these magic numbers r proof of my point btw 🙂
lol
>magic numbers
if you weren't such a godless heathen you'd know that god works in mysterious ways. you are going to spent eternity in hell, but keep on blaspheming like this and surely you'll roast on only the hottest flames of hell fire. but i forgive you and ask you repent for your sins. seek forgiveness from the lord before it is too late to save your soul.
>if you weren't such a heathen you'd be superstitious like me
get thee behind me satan
>he says after taking le magic numbers as a sign from God rather than the exegesis of the church that God himself created for your sake
You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons.
You're completely right. That's why I don't pretend to believe in God while in actuality publicly confessing to believing in magic repeating digits.
The only thing you have are your personal platitudes which you repeat to yourself, rather than the teachings of teachers who were given their power to teach, rule, and sanctify by God.
I also forgive you. And what I have forgiven, if there was anything to forgive, I have forgiven in the sight of Christ for your sake, in order that Satan might not outwit us. For we are not unaware of his schemes.
>go and seek the light friend and peace be with you
Jesus Christ only established one church, my friend...
Go attempt to take part in any random catholic communion (even as a christian) you'd be denied such grace. I'm glad jesus didn't act or think in such ways to the thief on the cross otherwise it'd destroy all tenants of it's religion.
mormons are weird but based
It wasn't to spread the influence of God but the politics of man masquerading as the messengers of God.
It depends on which one you're talking about doofus. Also why does everyone like to bring this shit up constantly and never mentions Islamic conquest and taking euros and others as slaves and even eunuchs. Seems awfully israelitey to me
wasn't that like 300 years earlier?
Starting from Muhammad's death until very recently actually. Even the US had to send ships to stop them taking slaves and fricking shit up. Just odd how history is taught so one sided, must be because Ghislaine Maxwells dad merged with McGraw Hill and wrote all our history books, what a weird coincidence eh?
i meant in reference to the film's story
because that's the "islamic golden age" while Europe was suffering under the "christian dark age"
Lol yeah thats another example of the one-sidedness. If I'm not mistaken that term was coined by israelites and isn't taken seriously by anyone who's familiar with European history. Despite all that I still like the movie.
islamists have been committing atrocities for the entire history of their existence, white christians are held to a higher standard.
>white christians are held to a higher standard.
well they were serving god and fighting the forces of evil, what other higher cause is there?
Cute way of saying cucked.
>for no reason
qrd?
>expecting someone on Cinemaphile to summerize 4000+ years of history into one post
read a book Black person
>killed a bunch of israelites
>for no reason
Black person please
>for no reason
Thoughts on jihad?
To whom does Jerusalem belong?
>To whom does Jerusalem belong?
the bones of those it stands on
it belongs to me
>killed a bunch of israelites in the rhine for no reason
Based.
>killed basically any christian who wasn't catholic
Based.
The more dead Abrahamists, the better.
>killed a bunch of israelites in the rhine for no reason
"A israelite will always tell you WHAT happened to him but never WHY."
-ancient proverb from multiple cultures throughout human history
Hardly, the first crusade was absolutely necessary and was a justified defense against an existential threat to Christendom and Europe as a whole. The past couple centuries at that point Islam had been encroaching further and further into Europe beyond modern day turkey and had even invaded lower Spain. Even with their dominance in the area Islamists did nothing to make the greater Mediterranean sea safe to travel making commerce in Europe suffer. They got what was coming to them.
FPBP.
Kingdom of Heaven sucked because Orlando Bloom was a major miscast. A 5'5" twink cannot be a Medieval sword-wielding Knight. Just no way.
They should not have killed off that diverse motley crew so soon. They were intriguing.
The point of the film is that they're all the bad guys, fighting pointless wars over the same shitty land because of "faith", and it will never end.
The Muslims are painted pretty well, and they don't even touch on the israelites
I wouldn't call Saladdin being essentially a grifter "painted pretty well"
Saladin was pretty based there's a reason he remained the most highly respected muslim in europe up to this day.
except the Christians are objectively the good guys
It’s just anti Christina propaganda
dogshit movie honestly
not only anticatholic but the whole thing is a poorly directed nothingburger
though that would describe almost every ridley scott movie now :
Nah, it's kino.
>no counterarguments
lol cope
>didn't make an argument in the first place
kek seethe
I actually did you just can't read since you're not white.
>it's shit
>it's a nothingburger
sorry, pajeet, those aren't arguments
kek cope
>nonwhite projecting
lmfao seethe
>nonwhite projecting
I know you are, you already conceded that you made no argument when it was pointed out, Raj
lol, lmao even
>N-NO I
holy cope
>all this projection
>"muh filtered"
lol I don't speak monkey, try rewording it when you speak to your white master. got that, boy?
>seething this hard
top kek
>he started talking about israelites and shit for like half an hour out of nowhere
what was the context? their roles in the crusades? their victimhood?
>still seething cause I shit on their Black personmonkey version of history
lmfao
>can’t cope with non having an argument
chimping out is in character for your type kek
I've literally got you and your friend chimping out over my based white power assessment of this shitty movie?
If it was wrong why did you reply both reply with so much seethe?
Black person gonna nig
lmao blue eyed pepe won’t give you blue eyes, raj
All out of non-arguments, boy?
lmfao
meanwhile Olivier shits on Scott
>no counter arguments
lol
You'd have to present a counter-argument to begin with, boy
I actually did you just can't read since you're not white.
based
Non-whites can’t understand mockery any more than they can arguments or movies lmao
I already said that line.
Golden shutdown.
it’s seething now lmao
Damn straight, Satan.
The only shortcoming was not actually portraying the battle at Hattin. I wanted to see the last charges of the Templar on screen.
An offshoot of the People's Crusade where a bunch of Germs said 'eh, killing israelites that live nearby is good enough & cheaper. They killed Jesus + they're annoying, so they deserve it.' more or less.
Wacky Germans
>Tends to make them angry just seeing it.
Still seething that we brought them civilisation.
>dogshit movie honestly
Not an argument. It's a good movie honestly.
>not only anticatholic but the whole thing is a poorly directed nothingburger
Catholics are shit-tier, but a lot happens in the film meaning it's not a nothingburger. You were filtered.
>though that would describe almost every ridley scott movie now :
Not an argument, you've been filtered hard.
Why can't non-whites understand films by whites?
This movie is ahistorical garbage. Directors cut too.
>ahistorical
how?
For starters Balian was almost 50 and was born in the holy land. He also didn’t romance Sybilla, he was married to her mom (or step mom, can’t rememeber). Saladin didn’t free every Christian, he only freed those who could afford ransom, and the rest were enslaved. And lastly Guy and Raynaud weren’t a rogue subverting King Baldwin. They were probably all in cahoots. The most accurate part was the Crusaders losing at Hattin due to overextending themselves. The two armies were more evenly matched despite the difference in size (~15k Christians vs. ~20k Muslims - not 200k like in the movie). When Lionheart crusaded a few years later he easily won every battle and retook basically all the coastal cities. Only reason he didn’t retake the city of Jerusalem was because he didn’t want to make the same mistake and overextend himself as it would have been an absolute bloodbath and coin flip sieging Jerusalem.
>Raynaud
I just watched a documentary and Raynaud was probably the staunchest ally of Baldwin.
Inshallah.
Not when God wills it.
>how do you respond without sounding mad?
Yes, haven't you played assassin's creed?
How can non-whites (
) be filtered by this?
European history is controversial for non-whites.
Tends to make them angry just seeing it.
>European history is controversial for non-whites.
>Tends to make them angry just seeing it.
Non-whites can't even form cohesive arguments about why they don't like it kek
this
>Non-whites can't even form cohesive arguments about why they don't like it kek
I think it's just some pajeet off /misc/ judging from all the filenames being fresh and the desire to be white despite hating whites.
never met a white person who dislikes KoH
Yeah, but you've never met a white person at all.
Not on Cinemaphile anyway, y'all are brown as mud and twice as smelly, yeehaw!
>Another Kingdom of Heaven thread
This is the fourth one I've seen since I started keeping track yesterday.
Anyway, I watched both of these documentaries off of youtube.
The Kings & Generals one is better produced, but I thought it was weird when he started talking about israelites and shit for like half an hour out of nowhere. The Real Crusades History guy is nicer in my opinion, despite leaving out all the battle info since he's just using royalty free stuff mostly. He paints the Crusaders in a relatively positive light overall, compared to the K&G one. Also he says CruSAYYYD which I think is funny. Has anyone else seen a weird uptick in Crusader media references even prior to this whole lame Gaza stuff, or am I the weird one?
Ah sweet another Christ LARPer seething thread
>the DC is good!
why did Cinemaphile lie to me
What movie do you think is good, and then what movie did you think the DC of KoH would live up to from how good people said it was? I think it's good, but I'd like to hear what you have to say.
Kingdom of Heaven is one of the best films of the last 20 years, definitely one of Ridley Scott’s best.
it's pure kino
It was a different time.
Muslims
>Launch Jihad after Jihad against Europe with the hopes of turning the land Islamic.
>It was tradition for every new Muslim King to declare Jihad and wage war.
>Engage in slave trade of not only blacks but white Christians.
>This got so bad that living near the coast was considered a death sentence.
>Muslims keep fricking around, enslaving and conquering Christian lands, slaughtering everyone who stood against them.
Christians
>Christian Kingdoms finally are fed up and unite to drive the invaders back and to take Jerusalem as payback.
Muslims
>"EVIL CRUSADERS JUST WANT TO SLAUGHTER US FOR NO REASON! WE DID NOTHING WRONG! ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE! CHRISTIANS ARE BLOOD THIRSTY MONSTERS!"
>When I was in my sixteenth Kingdom of Heaven thread, I made a great shitpost. I felt in that moment I would live to see a hundred threads. Now I know I shall not see thirty. None of us know our end, really, or what anon will guide us there. A janny may warn a man, a mod may ban an anon, but that anon can also move himself, and only then does that anon truly begin his own game. Remember that howsoever you are banned or by whom, your soul is in your keeping alone, even though those who presume to play you be jannies or men of power. When you stand before God, you cannot say, "I was filtered by Kingdom of Heaven," or that the christians were le bad guys. This will not suffice. Remember that.
>When you stand before God, you cannot say, "I was filtered by Kingdom of Heaven,"
>but that anon can also turn airplane mode on and off, and only then does that anon truly begin his own game
>Golden shutdown.
kingdom of heaven is a movie made for circumcised people
Varangian Guard, whatever happened there?
Politicians eventually made them into a ceremonial role, then they fell with the Byzantine empire when the ottomans took constantinople.
Heavy Infantry started to get countered as calvary got better.
replaced by cataphracts?
No. Those were two separate contingents of the military. They just died out, anon. A lot of them just got old, and over time they were there to hang out mostly.
Were they replaced by anything or just kept at home to guard the emperor?
Nothing replaced them.
Normans were too strong
The crusaders during the first crusade seem like a bunch of buttholes who stumbled their way from Europe to Constantinople and then into Jerusalem and in spite of everything they manage to do it
I'd be cool to have a film about it
A current year crusades film would just be junk.
KoH caused enough kvetching as it is.
>The crusaders during the first crusade seem like a bunch of buttholes
>Damn straight, Satan.
honestly the saracens were the best part of the film
Only because they were not portrayed accurate to history. The movie actually made both Crusaders and Saracens much more noble than they were in reality, but were especially kind to the Saracens. Probably the most laughable thing about this movie is the way Saladin dealt with the Christians in Jerusalem. In reality he had intended to slaughter them all, but was only dissuaded from this when the Crusader who led the defense swore to kill every Muslim in the city and destroy every Mosque before the city fell. So Saladin did spare them... by enslaving over 15,000 men, women, and children.
>the Crusader who led the defense swore to kill every Muslim in the city and destroy every Mosque before the city fell. So Saladin did spare them... by enslaving over 15,000 men, women, and children.
Seems based of Saladin.
The only way to establish peace between the israelites and Palestinians is to reestablish the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Crusade when?
What are you, 13 years old 10 years ago?
impossible with the current israeli pope
> Crusaders are the bad guys
No
Redpill me on King John. Was he really that terrible?
Not many king's of England have been named John hence since.
He's probably a good king knowing how history has been ~~*written*~~ so far.
With sound?
Edward Norton carried the shit out of this movie. The first half would be boring shit without him
191668706
Poor b8
You cant get a kino crusade flick without that era's goyslop. Back then they were happy with just mocking or straight up shitting on christians while uplifting poc.
Pretty sure if created now we'd have the leader of templar be some brownoid and even more islamic ideas.
>steals the show in you’re path
I can’t find any videos or photos of Norton on set in costume or doing any interviews about this role. Was surprised to see his name in the credit roll
He and the Saladin actor were the best part
Do have any of Saladin riding up to meet Baldwin?
Nope sorry.
This was a based movie, and made an impression on child me for two reasons.
>Watch Kingdom of Heaven Theatrical version
>Christianity bad
>Watch Kingdom of Heaven Director's cut
>Every religion has dickheads, also Christianity is literally real wtf
>110F
>wears full chain mail and 7 layers of clothing
>metal cap
yeah right
back then men were men and not the weak homosexuals you and your peers are
>good guys vs bad guys
when will you grow up?
Quick, name more medieval kino.
the northman is my favorite, but yes more please
ONCE MORE INTO THE BREACH MY FRIENDS!
I mean the effect that Christianity had on the western world is interesting, but abrahamic religions are ultimately just memes considering Judaism itself which Christianity and Islam are based on is a syncretic religion that borrowed heavily from Egyptian, Canaanite and Sumerian myths.
El being the father of 60 lesser deities like Ba'al and Yahweh, Mose's covenant code being pretty much Hammurabi's code of law, and Noah's Ark pretty much cribbed from the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Most of the stories in the bible and talmud were written VERY recently historically speaking, within the last 2000 years, probably compiled by rabbis in Alexandria and borrows from preexisting stories of the ancient middle east.