what's with this weird frickin rule DC has where if you kill someone you thus inherit literally all of their evil and badness >magog >batkek >injustice superman
>gee, why does this hero who uses lethal force end up using it on more than one person >or inspiring others to use lethal force when it was so effective in this situation
>gee, why does this hero who uses lethal force end up using it on more than one person >or inspiring others to use lethal force when it was so effective in this situation
Batman Who Laughs was jokerifed because Joker had a dead mans switch that would do that to whoever killed him.
in kingdom come, magog killing joker was a call to arms for the sick sadists to become superheroes because it was a signal that the public would now tolerate the use of lethal force to stop super villains
the problem came when they had killed all the supervillains, but now all these superpowered thrill junkies who only became superheroes to get their fix of violence had no one left to use their powers on and began using it on each other or on jaywalkers
even if magog had the best of intentions killing the joker, the cascading effects of the public condoning his use of lethal force meant everyone went out to use it
and the list of people who are willing to use murder and the list of people who are genuinely unhinged have a lot of overlap
>if you kill lunatics who never do any good you'll turn into a lunatic who never does any good because... you just will!
Kingdom Come is a b***hy, sanctimonious screed that is only praised because of Alex Ross's art.
>if you kill lunatics who never do any good you'll turn into a lunatic who never does any good because >the people who legitimately think killing is fine as long as the target deserved it are either borderline villains or misguided at best >and the people who are genuinely motivated by the chance to kill some evildoers rarely have the publics interest at heart
>if you kill lunatics who never do any good you'll turn into a lunatic who never does any good because... you just will!
Kingdom Come is a b***hy, sanctimonious screed that is only praised because of Alex Ross's art.
DC can't be fixed or sustain a cinematic universe if they're this willing to condemn killing.
no we must rape the joker
the clown always breaks free from arkham and can't be killed so we must take the third option and pummel his harlequin hole into submission
he cannot commit crime if he can't walk from having his ass blasted open and keeps slipping on the skeetriver trailing from it
magog
basically a giant middle-finger to cable
though alex ross said he found the design pretty cool after he was finished, so magog ended up becoming a fairly sympathetic character
>Magog kills Joker
>becomes just as bad as Joker
Batman was right.
what's with this weird frickin rule DC has where if you kill someone you thus inherit literally all of their evil and badness
>magog
>batkek
>injustice superman
It transfers in equity
>gee, why does this hero who uses lethal force end up using it on more than one person
>or inspiring others to use lethal force when it was so effective in this situation
Killing is le bad but unironically.
Batman Who Laughs was jokerifed because Joker had a dead mans switch that would do that to whoever killed him.
Media executives are criminals so they commission pro-criminal propaganda. It's that simple.
Literally the opposite you fricking idiot
?si=C8ZDW1LTRAMy6aN-&t=1162
Meanwhile in not DC
in kingdom come, magog killing joker was a call to arms for the sick sadists to become superheroes because it was a signal that the public would now tolerate the use of lethal force to stop super villains
the problem came when they had killed all the supervillains, but now all these superpowered thrill junkies who only became superheroes to get their fix of violence had no one left to use their powers on and began using it on each other or on jaywalkers
even if magog had the best of intentions killing the joker, the cascading effects of the public condoning his use of lethal force meant everyone went out to use it
and the list of people who are willing to use murder and the list of people who are genuinely unhinged have a lot of overlap
>if you kill lunatics who never do any good you'll turn into a lunatic who never does any good because... you just will!
Kingdom Come is a b***hy, sanctimonious screed that is only praised because of Alex Ross's art.
>if you kill lunatics who never do any good you'll turn into a lunatic who never does any good because
>the people who legitimately think killing is fine as long as the target deserved it are either borderline villains or misguided at best
>and the people who are genuinely motivated by the chance to kill some evildoers rarely have the publics interest at heart
He should have killed the Joker in secret
DC can't be fixed or sustain a cinematic universe if they're this willing to condemn killing.
alright van bach, go back to the gulag
Its a capeshit story.
You need to justify keeping Joker alive which is pretty hard when his body count could make Harry Shipman blush, please understand.
no we must rape the joker
the clown always breaks free from arkham and can't be killed so we must take the third option and pummel his harlequin hole into submission
he cannot commit crime if he can't walk from having his ass blasted open and keeps slipping on the skeetriver trailing from it
does magog have the balls to do it?
What's his name?
magog
basically a giant middle-finger to cable
though alex ross said he found the design pretty cool after he was finished, so magog ended up becoming a fairly sympathetic character
His real name.
magog is his only name
he never reveals any kind of civilian name, or even a backstory
for all intents and purposes, he is magog
wouldnt be surprised of he signs his checks with that
What even is that name?
Biblical one
Explain.
I assume it's not just that it sounds like "Ma God!" right?
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=magog
i'm magog
how can you kill magog?
what a grand and intoxicating innocence