>youngest >is barely 8 months younger than paul
Little-brother syndrome inferiority conplex narcissist homosexual, George was the worst beatle by far and everyonr who isn't a brainlet inmediately can tell >i am not as good as john and paul
Of course you aren't, you didn't even care about writting songs until rubber soul dumb fricker
Because they only gave him 1 song per album. George unironically had the biggest ego of them all thinking his contributions were on the same level as Paul and John's
Crazy this is one of their least played songs on Spotify yet it's one of George's best songs. Really wish they had more songs in this rougher psychedelic style.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4vbJQ-MrKo
Fun choice. Such a simple song but the guitar lick goes hard
George was the real reason the Beatles broke up. John was such a limp dicked wimp that Paul could've bullied him into more albums but George was adamant that people heard his Harrisongs
no you stupid Black person george was the only one who bought up the idea of every member doing solo albums while working as beatles it was pauls narcissistic behavior that had everyone pissed off. man would even shout at ringo in front of everyone, dennis taylor once said that he never hated anymore than macca in the let it be time period. plus even during post beatles time it was george who came up with love and stopped paul from fricking up during anthlology and free as a bird
did you not? george bought a proper song like all things must pass that was too difficult for john to play because he was busy doing drugs but of course gets ignored. was also the only one who was actively trying to work on the songs with paul which is why they blow up again unlike ringo who had completely checked out. despite that he actively encourages paul to release get back as a single and makes them move from a film studio to apple studios and inviting preston because he knows that they need a third party in the room to encourage john. he was also right about them not being ready to perform live because they sound like shit
Yup. The fact that Paul is now doing horrible zombie Beatles songs that George and John would have completely forbade is further proof of his nature. I’m sick of his squeaky clean image.
Paul is truly the best Beatle. >not a total degenerate >good father to his kids >good husband to his wife >more of a father to johns first son than john >hardest worker in the beatles >not a communist >not a oikophobe >most musically gifted >never gives a fan a bad experience >richest beatle
Paul was The Beatles. John may have had the aggression needed in their early days to push through the rough club system and would be crazy on-stage but Paul always had the more melodic ear. John dominated until just after Help! then got too up his own ass and moody, so Paul started taking over. As a result, the second half of The Beatles was way more sonically interesting and varied. While John's songs became more self-centered and monotone and "meaningful," Paul's became universal and anthemic. Compare the two's solo work in the @970s and tell me any different. John started strong but was too angry and cynical to ever sustain that mindframe while Paul relished it. Nobody wants to hear depressing minimalistic two-note whines from a millionaire famous person, they want to hear colorful interesting warm creative music that speaks to them. Paul was The Beatles. And it turned out he was the only one that didn't need the rest of them.
Ringo was cool but he was just the amiable one that was happy to be there. John was an angry grump who fell into drugs for like 10 years before cleaning himself up then he died. George was just not a very good songwriter, esp compared to Lennon/McCartney, and would have had maybe some mid psychedelic-pop hits before fading into obscurity on his own. Much like he kinda did anyway because his solo work was pretty terrible.
Do you think if John's dad didnt leave him at a young age, John would have had a better personality? Like let's assume his dad was always there, and his mom didnt get flattened. Would john be a happier guy?
5 months ago
Anonymous
my favorite john interview was where he talked about almost fricking his mom and then pussying out. He said he regretted not doing it. His mom was a huge bawd and I think he had more issues than his dad being dead.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Link? I never heard of that.
5 months ago
Anonymous
it was in the Lewisohn bio of the beatles 'tune in', i've never read/heard the actual interview
5 months ago
Anonymous
doubt that actually ever happened but understandable why he would have those feelings towards her. Sounds like she just randomly popped in his life at random times when it was convenient for her. If I recall correctly he didn't even know she was his mom for a long while, he was told she was an older sister or something like that?
5 months ago
Anonymous
eh, Lewisohn was super thorough. Tune In is a great read.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I think he would have been happier if his mom didn't die. Then again, that's what made he and McCartney become such close friends in the first place, their shared pain of losing their mothers. But Paul had a loving family left and a devoted, involved father; John had strict Aunt Mimi. Also explains why Paul was much more naturally inclined to be a family man while it took John a failed marriage, abandoned first son, and a decade of drug abuse before figuring out family is what matters. So yeah probably, but also John had a case of extreme arrested development that didn't resolve itself until his mid-30s. Then he shut down for 5 years to discover that, and then he was shot just before his comeback album came out. For the best in a weird way, as the inevitable Beatles reunion in the 1980s would have maybe ruined the band's mythology. As Henry Beard quipped when he was informed John Lennon was shot: "Good career move."
Paul was The Beatles. John may have had the aggression needed in their early days to push through the rough club system and would be crazy on-stage but Paul always had the more melodic ear. John dominated until just after Help! then got too up his own ass and moody, so Paul started taking over. As a result, the second half of The Beatles was way more sonically interesting and varied. While John's songs became more self-centered and monotone and "meaningful," Paul's became universal and anthemic. Compare the two's solo work in the @970s and tell me any different. John started strong but was too angry and cynical to ever sustain that mindframe while Paul relished it. Nobody wants to hear depressing minimalistic two-note whines from a millionaire famous person, they want to hear colorful interesting warm creative music that speaks to them. Paul was The Beatles. And it turned out he was the only one that didn't need the rest of them.
Paul is truly the best Beatle. >not a total degenerate >good father to his kids >good husband to his wife >more of a father to johns first son than john >hardest worker in the beatles >not a communist >not a oikophobe >most musically gifted >never gives a fan a bad experience >richest beatle
John had more raw talent in his pinkie than Paul in his entire being. Paul was a workaholic who wrote like 40 songs a day, to him everything was in inspiration. It could be his dead mother or a teapot. Obviously working with John for so many years had rubbed off on him and most of what he wrote was bound to be good. John didn't even had to try and the songs just came to him, hence his lazy personality. He never had to struggle and "earn" his talent like Paul.
Compare how many Beatle-level classics John had in his 10-year solo career: >Imagine >Jealous Guy >Mother >Working Class Hero >Mind Games >Give Peace a Chance >Women >Beautiful Boy >Just Like Starting Over >Watching the Wheels
Meanwhile Paul in 50 years >Maybe I'm Amazed >Band on The Run (arguable)
5 months ago
Anonymous
WRONG
5 months ago
Anonymous
>just names random john songs and claims that theyre classics
RAM mogs most of em.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>just names random john songs and claims that theyre classics
Holy cope
5 months ago
Anonymous
[...] >the RAMposter has arrived to shit up your thread
RAM is the ultimate virgin pleb filter.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>paul writes 10 great songs >john writes 1 genre changing masterpiece
pretty much the beatles in a nutshell
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Imagine
One of the worst songs ever written >Jealous Guy
Originally intended for White Album under the title 'Riisraelitesh, ' basic obvious boring song >Mother
Waaaahhhhh >Working Class Hero
Rich man telling you why he's a hero. Also, your life is dumb and you're dumb. Shit. >Mind Games
More boring one-note wailing shit. Are you listening to this for fun? >Give Peace a Chance
Hippy garbage from a multimillionaire. >Women
The frick is this song? I know the superior McCartney song 'Woman" >Beautiful Boy
Pussy bullshit. Oh wow he's singing soft! What a GENIUS!!! >Just Like Starting Over
Tralala shallow shit that he always b***hed about but this is just shit boring flat doo-wop and he was like 40 doing this. >Watching the Wheels
Meh. I mean, obvious. Boring. Sounds like shit. >Meanwhile Paul in 50 years >Maybe I'm Amazed
Great song >Band on The Run (arguable)
Also great song
others: >The entirety of RAM >Red Rose Speedway >Live & Let Die >Most of Band on the Run album >McCartney II >Spies Like Us >Flowers in the Dirt >Flaming Pie album >Chaos and Creation in the Backyard >Cut Me Some Slack >McCartney III
Any questions? >
5 months ago
Anonymous
>McCartney II
Coming Up is unreasonably catchy.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>no arguments
I win. Johnchads we did it
5 months ago
Anonymous
>imagine
Hippy commie nonsense. >jealous guy
Shit song full of seethe. >mother
He wanted to frick his mother. >working class hero
Paul was the actual working class hero, John was upper middle. >give peace a chance
More hippy nonsense. >women
lmao just lmao >beautiful boy
As bad as Little James. >just like starting over
Something I've never done after listen to this song. >watching the wheels
Yeah of the casette tape wondering when it would end.
ringo never wrote a good song that wasn't written by others (mainly george)
5 months ago
Anonymous
He got by with a little help from his friends.
5 months ago
Anonymous
it don't come easy, literally linked in this thread
5 months ago
Anonymous
>In author Robert Rodriguez's description, the official songwriting credit was long thought to be "bogus" and, notwithstanding Starr's involvement, a sign of Harrison's "great generosity" in wanting to help the drummer establish himself independently of the Beatles
People say he was the most musically gifted because he objectively was, it has nothing to do with his personality. He is the best at his respective instruments, decent at the other's instruments, the most skilled vocalist with the biggest range, was competent at arranging and producing, and is an all time great melodist. Who can compete with that
Was Ringo always eccentric or did he become like that after the Beatles? In Get Back he’s very mellow and chill but in interviews in the 70s 80s he’s like a wacky comedian. What changed?
When I first played Revolver to my gf she thought the Indian song was an advert at first. Then when I told her no it’s a good song on the album she started laughing and said I have a good sense of humour.
based anon for having good taste. cringe gf for having shit taste. although wait– maybe she's based actually because women lack the intelligence to really understand art
>john brings yoko to the studio >george calls her a bawd to her face and tells john that she has a bad reputation and gives off bad vibes >john seethes but doesnt punch george
chad energy
>JOHN: There’s no telling George. He always has a point of view about that wide, you know. [John places his hands a few inches apart.] You can’t tell him anything. >YOKO: George is sophisticated, fashionwise… >JOHN: He’s very trendy, and he has the right clothes, and all of that… >YOKO: But he’s not sophisticated, intellectually. >JOHN: No. He’s very narrow-minded and he doesn’t really have a broader view. Paul is far more aware than George. One time in the Apple office in Wigmore Street, I said something to George, and he said, “I’m as intelligent as you, you know.” This must have been resentment, but he could have left anytime if I was giving him a hard time. >MCCABE: What did you say? >JOHN: I didn’t answer. Of course, he’s got an inferiority complex working with Paul and me. >YOKO: In the case of Paul, it’s not that he’s not sophisticated. I’m sure that he’s intellectually sophisticated as well. It’s just that he’s aware, and yet he doesn’t want to know. >JOHN: Whereas George doesn’t really know what’s happening, you know.
george was a brainlet
this was john seething because george didn't want yoko to "perform" in concert for bangladesh kek also this coming from the pair who thought filming john jerking off was art is still funny
>>YOKO: But he’s not sophisticated, intellectually. >>JOHN: No. He’s very narrow-minded and he doesn’t really have a broader view.
Lennon was a fricking idiot proto-redditor and elitist.
>JOHN: (...) One time in the Apple office in Wigmore Street, I said something to George, and he said, “I’m as intelligent as you, you know.”
He was a talented musician, but god damn just reading this makes me hate that homosexual leftoid hippie even more than I already do.
>george was a brainlet
For Lennon and Yoko the meaning of "knowing" changed every 6 months. Harrison stuck to his philosophy until his death. If we're talking about spirituality and shit Paul was the brainlet one. He has never said anything of any depth in 70 years.
Based unpretentious Paul, spirituality is a brainlet pursuit in the first place for people who aren't emotionally stable, well adjusted and optimistic the way he naturally is.
I mean that’s what John (and Yoko) are saying here. Paul is lacking in intellectual curiosity and he has still yet to show any. John was more right than even he knew.
reading that fricking beatles book and learning about him fricking broke me. Frick this life that this dude got his german waifu but because he got beat down in a shit ass town he got brain damage and died.
>beatles break up >only time any of the beatles work with martin again is paul with live and let die >instant classic, absolute banger >still no one phones up martin again
what did they mean by this
>takes him like 7 years to catch up wih John and Paul >is so excited he blows his load too early and then writes like 4 or 5 songs on that level for the rests of his life
And even then ATMP is not even the best Beatle solo album
even so ATMP utterly mogs the rest of the Beatles solo canon, yes Imagine, Double Fantasy, Band on the Run, Ram, and Ringo are good, but they are cheap toys by comparison.
What kind of bland person thinks like this? George has never had a creative impulse in his entire life on the level of 1985 or Monkberry Moon Delight and Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey or Backseat of my Car. All he has is regular mid tempo rock material buried under standard overblown Spector production. It's not bad but the difference in natural musical talent is an absolute gulf... Paul could write similar stuff in his sleep but he's too inventive with arrangements to fill a three disc album with it.
>>is so excited he blows his load too early and then writes like 4 or 5 songs on that level for the rests of his life
in every single beatles thread here this exact same sentence is posted for some reason when in reality living in the material is world is georges best album and even his 'contractually obligated' albums have some gems
Why was he such a little b***h?
He thought everybody was angry at each other and conspiring against each other.
so he was unjustifiably paranoid then
He was the youngest and they all treated him like the little brother who didn't matter
>youngest
>is barely 8 months younger than paul
Little-brother syndrome inferiority conplex narcissist homosexual, George was the worst beatle by far and everyonr who isn't a brainlet inmediately can tell
>i am not as good as john and paul
Of course you aren't, you didn't even care about writting songs until rubber soul dumb fricker
Paul was a chad though
Because they only gave him 1 song per album. George unironically had the biggest ego of them all thinking his contributions were on the same level as Paul and John's
>comes back
>backstabs Paul
Nuthin personnel
>Gets stabbed 50 times and gets aids and dies as a result
Oh the irony
>george harrison 2.png
Yes?
>goes on to make the best solo Beatles record
>concert for Bangladesh pwns
Even ringo had goodnight Vienna. Paul and John made a huge mistake leaving each other
>goes on to make the best solo Beatles record
Ahem, Paul dabbed on his paki shit
no
Yes
N
>the RAMposter has arrived to shit up your thread
I enjoyed this album I listened to the first time recently
Paul’s solo shit is granny music and always will be.
ALRIGHT LADS
MAXWELL'S SILVER HAMMER
TAKE 732
LETS GO OI
ITS 3AM! THE COPS CAME BY AND SAID WE ARE BEING TOO LOUD! LAST TAKE BOIIIIIIIS
he always looks haggard
Favourite Beatles song that isnt considered a classic?
Arguably a classic tbqh.
Eh maybe
You keep all your money in a big brown bag inside a zoo
What a thing to do
Nice pick.
Such a mysterious and atmospheric song yet I hardly hear mentioned
Definitely classics
kino
Crazy this is one of their least played songs on Spotify yet it's one of George's best songs. Really wish they had more songs in this rougher psychedelic style.
Fun choice. Such a simple song but the guitar lick goes hard
I've had several schizo freakouts to this song
this is a classic moron
FRICK YOU
we got some kinoisseurs in this thread
my personal favorite Beatles song:
?si=8Mur_1yiRVUWXmFt
>baby you're a rich gay israelite
what did they mean by this
Don’t Let Me Down
>Joins the band
I always thought Yoko was native american or something, but turns out she's 100% Japanese, with a tradable lineage all the way to pre imperial Japan
It turns out that there's ugly Japanese women too.
>thought Yoko was native american or something
Really? You thought some b***h with the name "Yoko Ono" was a prairie Black person?
Of course there's ugly jap women. You weebs are so mind broken that's a surprising statement for you.
George was the real reason the Beatles broke up. John was such a limp dicked wimp that Paul could've bullied him into more albums but George was adamant that people heard his Harrisongs
no you stupid Black person george was the only one who bought up the idea of every member doing solo albums while working as beatles it was pauls narcissistic behavior that had everyone pissed off. man would even shout at ringo in front of everyone, dennis taylor once said that he never hated anymore than macca in the let it be time period. plus even during post beatles time it was george who came up with love and stopped paul from fricking up during anthlology and free as a bird
Uhh did you see the Let it Be documentary? Macca was the only one doing any work
did you not? george bought a proper song like all things must pass that was too difficult for john to play because he was busy doing drugs but of course gets ignored. was also the only one who was actively trying to work on the songs with paul which is why they blow up again unlike ringo who had completely checked out. despite that he actively encourages paul to release get back as a single and makes them move from a film studio to apple studios and inviting preston because he knows that they need a third party in the room to encourage john. he was also right about them not being ready to perform live because they sound like shit
lmao at this seething moron. George wrote 3 good songs in his life
Better songwriter than Georgie
Yup. The fact that Paul is now doing horrible zombie Beatles songs that George and John would have completely forbade is further proof of his nature. I’m sick of his squeaky clean image.
Here Comes the Sun is the most popular Beatles song now. He won
cope
Shallow slop song like all the Harrisongs
Shallow slop is based actually. After all, The Beatles were a pop band.
The problem with Harrisongs is that they are deep slop.
Macca carried the band
Unironically, how did they do it?
Macca + pre-bug John + less-serious Georgie
imagine if this gay didn't need his boipussy smashed. Literal twink energy robbed us of more beatles.
>4/5 in blazers
>even Ringo in the background
>George in a poncho
Kino.
>I DONT WANT THE BEATLES, I WANT THE wienerROACHES
For me its being a Paul chad
Paul is truly the best Beatle.
>not a total degenerate
>good father to his kids
>good husband to his wife
>more of a father to johns first son than john
>hardest worker in the beatles
>not a communist
>not a oikophobe
>most musically gifted
>never gives a fan a bad experience
>richest beatle
Paul was The Beatles. John may have had the aggression needed in their early days to push through the rough club system and would be crazy on-stage but Paul always had the more melodic ear. John dominated until just after Help! then got too up his own ass and moody, so Paul started taking over. As a result, the second half of The Beatles was way more sonically interesting and varied. While John's songs became more self-centered and monotone and "meaningful," Paul's became universal and anthemic. Compare the two's solo work in the @970s and tell me any different. John started strong but was too angry and cynical to ever sustain that mindframe while Paul relished it. Nobody wants to hear depressing minimalistic two-note whines from a millionaire famous person, they want to hear colorful interesting warm creative music that speaks to them. Paul was The Beatles. And it turned out he was the only one that didn't need the rest of them.
Idk, I like to think Ringo was kinda cool
Ringo was cool but he was just the amiable one that was happy to be there. John was an angry grump who fell into drugs for like 10 years before cleaning himself up then he died. George was just not a very good songwriter, esp compared to Lennon/McCartney, and would have had maybe some mid psychedelic-pop hits before fading into obscurity on his own. Much like he kinda did anyway because his solo work was pretty terrible.
Do you think if John's dad didnt leave him at a young age, John would have had a better personality? Like let's assume his dad was always there, and his mom didnt get flattened. Would john be a happier guy?
my favorite john interview was where he talked about almost fricking his mom and then pussying out. He said he regretted not doing it. His mom was a huge bawd and I think he had more issues than his dad being dead.
Link? I never heard of that.
it was in the Lewisohn bio of the beatles 'tune in', i've never read/heard the actual interview
doubt that actually ever happened but understandable why he would have those feelings towards her. Sounds like she just randomly popped in his life at random times when it was convenient for her. If I recall correctly he didn't even know she was his mom for a long while, he was told she was an older sister or something like that?
eh, Lewisohn was super thorough. Tune In is a great read.
I think he would have been happier if his mom didn't die. Then again, that's what made he and McCartney become such close friends in the first place, their shared pain of losing their mothers. But Paul had a loving family left and a devoted, involved father; John had strict Aunt Mimi. Also explains why Paul was much more naturally inclined to be a family man while it took John a failed marriage, abandoned first son, and a decade of drug abuse before figuring out family is what matters. So yeah probably, but also John had a case of extreme arrested development that didn't resolve itself until his mid-30s. Then he shut down for 5 years to discover that, and then he was shot just before his comeback album came out. For the best in a weird way, as the inevitable Beatles reunion in the 1980s would have maybe ruined the band's mythology. As Henry Beard quipped when he was informed John Lennon was shot: "Good career move."
John had more raw talent in his pinkie than Paul in his entire being. Paul was a workaholic who wrote like 40 songs a day, to him everything was in inspiration. It could be his dead mother or a teapot. Obviously working with John for so many years had rubbed off on him and most of what he wrote was bound to be good. John didn't even had to try and the songs just came to him, hence his lazy personality. He never had to struggle and "earn" his talent like Paul.
Compare how many Beatle-level classics John had in his 10-year solo career:
>Imagine
>Jealous Guy
>Mother
>Working Class Hero
>Mind Games
>Give Peace a Chance
>Women
>Beautiful Boy
>Just Like Starting Over
>Watching the Wheels
Meanwhile Paul in 50 years
>Maybe I'm Amazed
>Band on The Run (arguable)
WRONG
>just names random john songs and claims that theyre classics
RAM mogs most of em.
>just names random john songs and claims that theyre classics
Holy cope
RAM is the ultimate virgin pleb filter.
>paul writes 10 great songs
>john writes 1 genre changing masterpiece
pretty much the beatles in a nutshell
>Imagine
One of the worst songs ever written
>Jealous Guy
Originally intended for White Album under the title 'Riisraelitesh, ' basic obvious boring song
>Mother
Waaaahhhhh
>Working Class Hero
Rich man telling you why he's a hero. Also, your life is dumb and you're dumb. Shit.
>Mind Games
More boring one-note wailing shit. Are you listening to this for fun?
>Give Peace a Chance
Hippy garbage from a multimillionaire.
>Women
The frick is this song? I know the superior McCartney song 'Woman"
>Beautiful Boy
Pussy bullshit. Oh wow he's singing soft! What a GENIUS!!!
>Just Like Starting Over
Tralala shallow shit that he always b***hed about but this is just shit boring flat doo-wop and he was like 40 doing this.
>Watching the Wheels
Meh. I mean, obvious. Boring. Sounds like shit.
>Meanwhile Paul in 50 years
>Maybe I'm Amazed
Great song
>Band on The Run (arguable)
Also great song
others:
>The entirety of RAM
>Red Rose Speedway
>Live & Let Die
>Most of Band on the Run album
>McCartney II
>Spies Like Us
>Flowers in the Dirt
>Flaming Pie album
>Chaos and Creation in the Backyard
>Cut Me Some Slack
>McCartney III
Any questions?
>
>McCartney II
Coming Up is unreasonably catchy.
>no arguments
I win. Johnchads we did it
>imagine
Hippy commie nonsense.
>jealous guy
Shit song full of seethe.
>mother
He wanted to frick his mother.
>working class hero
Paul was the actual working class hero, John was upper middle.
>give peace a chance
More hippy nonsense.
>women
lmao just lmao
>beautiful boy
As bad as Little James.
>just like starting over
Something I've never done after listen to this song.
>watching the wheels
Yeah of the casette tape wondering when it would end.
Truly the worst Beatles analysis I’ve ever seen. Please refrain from ever posting again.
Paul never wrote anything as good as John and George.
He wrote better songs.
Ringo songs are fun and whimsical though.
ringo never wrote a good song that wasn't written by others (mainly george)
He got by with a little help from his friends.
it don't come easy, literally linked in this thread
>In author Robert Rodriguez's description, the official songwriting credit was long thought to be "bogus" and, notwithstanding Starr's involvement, a sign of Harrison's "great generosity" in wanting to help the drummer establish himself independently of the Beatles
I honestly hate morons who pretend Paul was the most musically gifted just cos he’s so le heckin wholesome (he isn’t btw)
People say he was the most musically gifted because he objectively was, it has nothing to do with his personality. He is the best at his respective instruments, decent at the other's instruments, the most skilled vocalist with the biggest range, was competent at arranging and producing, and is an all time great melodist. Who can compete with that
Paul Derangement Syndrome
bamp
eric cucking george since 1968
>Paul gays must pass…
>Paul gays must pass away
>meanwhile Paul is still alive while George is a rotting pile of bones
>alive
Yes
>*deletes at least 10 songs*
Ah, the perfect Beatles solo
Wrote song going like this : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y5olEjNjAw. Kek
God the vocals are so weak.
John had such a better voice; even when he was barely trying his voice came through.
My favourite song is Fool on the Hill 🙂
>ringo actually makes the best final beatles song
>just took ai to realize it
its easy
We won
Paul Chad's. How we doing today?
still alive, just like paul. unlike george lol got'em
Just listened to 'I've Just Seen A Face'.
A proper tune.
Not much just had sex for the eighth time today
>Paul Chad's. How we doing today?
We alive unlike George cucks and John losers
>not a paul chad
>iDork user
Just a damn shame
How you feel about Ringo? Nice chap?
>kills the no. 1 band in the world
>cursed to live with his failure for eternity
Ah yes. Truly living.
But enough about Yoko.
Imagine blaming everything on Yoko in current year
John bringing Yoko into the studio was a major reason things went to shit.
lol no they would've broken up with or without yoko. they were all tired of each other and tired of being the beatles
only because martin died. He lives and he holds it together.
>only because martin died
no wonder this thread is just full of made up bullshit by paul and john gays
>gets le ebin cancer
Masterful gambit sir
IVE GOT A FEELING! A FEELING I CANT HIDE OH NO!
>Say live and let die
>he focking left the band
Was Ringo always eccentric or did he become like that after the Beatles? In Get Back he’s very mellow and chill but in interviews in the 70s 80s he’s like a wacky comedian. What changed?
He did have that bloody big lentil curry.
>Singlehandedly introduces Indian music into the western mainstream
pretty based actually
HE FRICKING LEFT THE BAND
>ATTENTION PAUL CHUDS. STOP POSTING OR YOU WILL BE DETAINED. GEORGE CHADS CARRY ON YOUR BUSINESS.
>thread about george harrison
>devolves into paul versus john
george gays on suicide watch
I always skip his song on Revolver
When I first played Revolver to my gf she thought the Indian song was an advert at first. Then when I told her no it’s a good song on the album she started laughing and said I have a good sense of humour.
based anon for having good taste. cringe gf for having shit taste. although wait– maybe she's based actually because women lack the intelligence to really understand art
irs employee detected
>john brings yoko to the studio
>george calls her a bawd to her face and tells john that she has a bad reputation and gives off bad vibes
>john seethes but doesnt punch george
chad energy
Damn
>THAT b***h! SHES JUST TAKEN ONE OF MY BISCUITS
How were they so slim when they just ate biscuits and sat all day? I eat biscuits everyday and rarely move but I’m on the larger side let’s say.
They rarely ate full meals and they didn't sat around all day. Life was way less sedentary back then
>JOHN: There’s no telling George. He always has a point of view about that wide, you know. [John places his hands a few inches apart.] You can’t tell him anything.
>YOKO: George is sophisticated, fashionwise…
>JOHN: He’s very trendy, and he has the right clothes, and all of that…
>YOKO: But he’s not sophisticated, intellectually.
>JOHN: No. He’s very narrow-minded and he doesn’t really have a broader view. Paul is far more aware than George. One time in the Apple office in Wigmore Street, I said something to George, and he said, “I’m as intelligent as you, you know.” This must have been resentment, but he could have left anytime if I was giving him a hard time.
>MCCABE: What did you say?
>JOHN: I didn’t answer. Of course, he’s got an inferiority complex working with Paul and me.
>YOKO: In the case of Paul, it’s not that he’s not sophisticated. I’m sure that he’s intellectually sophisticated as well. It’s just that he’s aware, and yet he doesn’t want to know.
>JOHN: Whereas George doesn’t really know what’s happening, you know.
george was a brainlet
this was john seething because george didn't want yoko to "perform" in concert for bangladesh kek also this coming from the pair who thought filming john jerking off was art is still funny
How big was John's dick?
I never looked it up.
>>YOKO: But he’s not sophisticated, intellectually.
>>JOHN: No. He’s very narrow-minded and he doesn’t really have a broader view.
Lennon was a fricking idiot proto-redditor and elitist.
>JOHN: (...) One time in the Apple office in Wigmore Street, I said something to George, and he said, “I’m as intelligent as you, you know.”
He was a talented musician, but god damn just reading this makes me hate that homosexual leftoid hippie even more than I already do.
>george was a brainlet
For Lennon and Yoko the meaning of "knowing" changed every 6 months. Harrison stuck to his philosophy until his death. If we're talking about spirituality and shit Paul was the brainlet one. He has never said anything of any depth in 70 years.
>dude India
>dude communism
>dude peace and love
Yeah I’ll stick with being a Paul Chad
Harrison lusted after foreign cultures whilst knowing next to nothing of his own.
Were he a millenial he would be a total weeb.
Based unpretentious Paul, spirituality is a brainlet pursuit in the first place for people who aren't emotionally stable, well adjusted and optimistic the way he naturally is.
>man who spent his entire life simping for the queen and the royals
>well adjusted
He just wanted to frick her maj, he doesn't really talk about them otherwise
Imagine that, one of the Beatles being patriotic.
What a homosexual lmao
post hand
You will never be white mohammed
I mean that’s what John (and Yoko) are saying here. Paul is lacking in intellectual curiosity and he has still yet to show any. John was more right than even he knew.
weekend beatles threads on tv keep me going, thanks bros
wat about my boy stewie
him and astrid literally made the early beatles image but he was a bad player.
he wrote better melodies thats all
reading that fricking beatles book and learning about him fricking broke me. Frick this life that this dude got his german waifu but because he got beat down in a shit ass town he got brain damage and died.
>He’s very narrow-minded and he doesn’t really have a broader view.
Same guy who says
>imagine there’s no religion
If John han't died, would they have gotten back together at some point? What would an 80s/90s Beatles album sound like?
>If John han't died, would they have gotten back together at some point
nope
not without the good george (martin)
>beatles break up
>only time any of the beatles work with martin again is paul with live and let die
>instant classic, absolute banger
>still no one phones up martin again
what did they mean by this
because unlike paul the other two had moved on from the beatles sound and wanted to their own thing
I meant the other dude, the gay that got assraped to death. Wasn't that martin?
that was brian epstein
>epstein
Really makes you think.
no you're thinking of brian epstein (no relation)
you are posting a comment that really makes me think (248GB)
The Beach Boys were better
Mr. Harrison was actually a member of The Beatles. He never was part of The Band, and so could never leave them.
>he doesn't know
dear prudence is the best beatles song, and frick anyone that thinks different
I did a rough cover of I'm So Tired a few years back
https://soundcloud.com/fern_m/so-tired
Got My Mind Set On You is better than any proper Beatles song
I love Beatles autism
?feature=shared
can't wait until a.i. makes new beatles albums. it's gonna be amazing hearing all kinds of new stuff
I've posted everything in ~/pics/mu/beatles
please provide me with more content
>takes him like 7 years to catch up wih John and Paul
>is so excited he blows his load too early and then writes like 4 or 5 songs on that level for the rests of his life
And even then ATMP is not even the best Beatle solo album
even so ATMP utterly mogs the rest of the Beatles solo canon, yes Imagine, Double Fantasy, Band on the Run, Ram, and Ringo are good, but they are cheap toys by comparison.
What kind of bland person thinks like this? George has never had a creative impulse in his entire life on the level of 1985 or Monkberry Moon Delight and Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey or Backseat of my Car. All he has is regular mid tempo rock material buried under standard overblown Spector production. It's not bad but the difference in natural musical talent is an absolute gulf... Paul could write similar stuff in his sleep but he's too inventive with arrangements to fill a three disc album with it.
>on the level of 1985 or Monkberry Moon Delight and Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey or Backseat of my Car
ctfu paul gays are so delusional its unreal
>>is so excited he blows his load too early and then writes like 4 or 5 songs on that level for the rests of his life
in every single beatles thread here this exact same sentence is posted for some reason when in reality living in the material is world is georges best album and even his 'contractually obligated' albums have some gems
How'd they do it bros?