>"Loki is being built with a lot of love and care, and an eye for the cinematic. Any of these shows, any of these movies, anything in this world is about making a character focused story that audiences can connect with. I would challenge anyone watching to say that this show is not cinematic, and it’s not built with the highest craftsmanship and care. Frankly, people just want to see good stories. If you build something beautiful, the audience is going to enjoy it, whether it’s a show like this, or an indie film.”
>uh no Scorsese our show is actually really really good and special
Not convinced
Go back to your mobslop
make me
I can't tell if posts like this are bait or not. How are you on Cinemaphile-a board for film enthusiasts- but only see ol' marty as "the mob guy"? Have you seen any of his other movies?
He’s not wrong about old wop.
I will.
>claiming your own product is built with 'the highest craftsmanship'
Audacious fricker.
That loki producer looks like a skinny homosexual, therefore I side with Marty
>S o y boy vs Scorcese.
>Watch our newest slop, chuds.
Any criticism from Scorsese should simply be refuted by posting any of a number of scenes from The Irishman.
Scorsese peaked with Taxi Driver but there's nothing wrong with that. Being able to produce great work until the day you die is the exception, not the norm.
>"WYPIPO BAD" vs. "WYPIPO BAD" but longer
>We the police declare that police did nothing wrong when we shot down those unarmed kids
If they don't believe the police then, why should we believe them?
It'd be funny if Scorcese's movies weren't shit. But since they are, it looks more like two disabled children fighting, which is more sad than funny.
>Loki is being built with a lot of love and care, and an eye for the cinematic.
He's a funny guy
Funny how? Like he's a clown, does he amuse you?
scorcese isn't kino he never was kino
nice bait here's your (You)
I'd call the Loki guy a four eyed cuck but then again so is Shitsese.
>but i care a lot! i put a lot of care and passion and love into my work at the slop factory so the actual quality of the output should not matter, only how much i say i cared!
i hate narcissists
>Frankly, people just want to see good stories.
Loki had a wet fish of a story. It had an incredible premise, but they shat in their own soup.
Imagine saying those words out loud. Good god, to make such "elevated" drivel statements, I just hope somebody wrote that for him or something and he had to say it. Like a gun to his head and his baby with a bomb strapped to it and he had to read it. Otherwise. I don't know.
>I would challenge anyone watching to say that this show is not cinematic, and it’s not built with the highest craftsmanship and care.
I don't doubt that they would considering that the only people who still watch MSHEU are brainless lemmings that do and believe what they're told.
>If you build something beautiful, the audience is going to enjoy it, whether it’s a show like this, or an indie film
Yeah, thing is that disney purposely makes things ugly, and not just aestheticlly.
>attempting to defend your work as art while using terminology like "built" and "craftsmanship"
it's a movie, not a fricking piece of furniture
the language used really reveals that he sees loki as a product to be produced and consumed rather than the art he's pretending it qualifies as
not that anyone ever thought otherwise but it's funny to see that even the producer can't help but show his true feelings despite his best efforts
Looking into this guy Kevin R Wright he also made:
West Bank One: The Portugal Stories - (The Dramatic Retelling of the Story of Cats, Dogs, and Women) - A Documentary
>What happens when your best friend murders everything you love because he can't find your 'Everybody Loves Raymond' dvd's?
from imdb he is credited as the writer, director and star
>Loki has the most scenes of "actors talking on real sets" of any Marvel Studios project
>still can't escape it's branding as CG slop
Loki honestly does feel like watching a real show and not just BING ZOOM CGI FLYING EXPLOSIONS WEEEE typical MCU shit
>"Loki is being built with a lot of love and care, and an eye for the cinematic. Any of these shows, any of these movies, anything in this world is about making a character focused story that audiences can connect with. I would challenge anyone watching to say that this show is not cinematic, and it’s not built with the highest craftsmanship and care.
almost outdid will smith right there, give this guy a honorary cuck award
Real stories with real production value always filter the plebs.
Score to Loki.
FRICK CAPESHIT
and frick all the onions boy frickers bootlicking Disney's ass and this insane superhero shit
Go watch Scorseseseseseses latest 'wopipy bad' seethe.
The boomer that launched a billion seethes and made an entire generation of capeslop fans pout.
FRICK CAPESHIT
FRICK CAPESHIT
Gee, I sure am entertained by Martin Scorsese's tirades.
so is season 2 any good at all? i remember season 1 shit the bed pretty quickly and ended up being a clusterfrick of ideas with varying execution
It's not art if a room full of executives have a checklist for things you need to include.
Simple as.
>miniseries about quipping super power people in funny costumes time traveling across different dimensions or some shit with CGslop backdrops
Speaks nothing of the human condition. It doesn't inspire anyone. It's shit.
>nooo you gotta rip off French noire or its not a real movie
Frick off dumb guido prick
>French noire
Somehow I don’t think you know what you’re talking about
Shutter Island makes me sick.
>any of these movies is about making a character focused story that audiences can connect with.
I connect to porn while watching... connection doesn't make something worthwhile. It's not a description of inherent values
I can't connect to porn anymore, really miss the days were watching porn was genuinely exciting
I hear Scorsese loves the Brad episode in season 2.
>Nordic gods were le black Vs. white people are le bad
Which GoysIopper do you side with?
>anything in this world is about making a character focused story that audiences can connect with.
….?
>soulless slop
>even more soulless because it's a tv show based on a movie franchise
>even more soulless because it's like the 26th high profile mutliverse/timeline trend grab
>"but there's implied (straight) selfcest!
>would challenge anyone watching to say that this show is not cinematic
I would call it cinematic in a derogatory way.
Loki S1:
>consistent overarching plot
>cute romantic subplot
>great visuals not restricted to the same office space
>interesting character arcs for minor characters even though they are brief
Loki S2:
>romantic interest becomes a b***h for no reason
>becomes the Loki and Mobius show with minor characters almost irrelevant
>recycled scenery from S1 in every episode
>S1 had multiple plot threads, the only plot in S2 is the TVA is exploding and nothing else matters
If S2 wasn't so bad I would agree with him but cape slop will always be slop.
Studio execs be like
>Tone it down will ya? The goyim are getting excited for product.
They have to control our excitement using manipulated hooks. Any fan participation is deemed lost profit. ONLY CONSUME, NO VOLUNTEER
I will admit that Loki is no where near as dogshit as other MCU shows but built with the highest craftsmanship, top kek frick no.