>loses 1 hand
Tribal nature comes out and starts flinging accusations to get his shekels back
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>loses 1 hand
>loses 1 hand
Tribal nature comes out and starts flinging accusations to get his shekels back
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
qrd? i remember this fricking moron from survivor
he bluffed and lost. calls the b***h a cheater because she also had nothing so obviously she should have just folded instead of calling. hes a little b***h.
funniest thing to me is when i kept bluffing but they were bad bluffs, too small. It ended up being a 3 bet bluff which didnt make any sense. The guy called me which was the right thing to do, then on the 4th card i got my nuts. total luck. No one ever gave me credit after that because i was playing so stupidly betting so much with nothing. So all i had to do was just fold everything below a pair of 10s and i ended up knocking half the table out then bullying everyone else for an easy win. I dont normally play poker. I legit feel bad for knocking out the first guy but i really enjoyed watching other people look me up and down after i went all in with the nuts and them saying "okay i guess lets see if you have anything" lol.
Good job
>have nothing
>"all in"
>all in gets called
>she also has nothing but a little better so he loses
>NOOOOOOOO WHY DIDN'T YOU JUST SURRENDER DON'T YOU SEE I WENT ALL IN THAT MEANS MY HAND IS GOOD AND YOU MUST BE AFRAID AND FOLD IT'S MATHEMATICALLY THE BETTER PLAY TO LET ME WIN
So basically like that scene in the office where Michael goes all in and Toby calls
I had this happen in a friendly game once a decade ago and the homosexual still talks about it every time I see him. The dude is an open book and I simply called his bluff but he keeps saying there was "no way I could have known" and it was "actually a bad call".
kek, i folded a hand to an in-law and told his daughter:
>i folded because he had 2 jacks
the fricker was absolutely stunned that I knew his exact hand and wont shut the frick up about it every time we go camping
If she called all in with j high, that guy must be one easy to read moron, like almost literally playing with his cards up, or that b***h is insane and should stick to bj (both versions)
Even if she read him, his hand was favorite to win. I.e., there were more cards in that deck he could win with than her.
I would have called too if I saw his hand. He had what, 35% percent chance?
He had a 53% chance. Can you not fricking read what I said? There were more cards in the deck that could have came on that river that would have given him the winning hand than her.
I'm putting myself in her seat, if I saw his cards and that board, I would've called. How the frick would I know what cards remained in the deck? He had a 40% chance at best under average circumstances, good enough for a coin flip for me.
There's RFID chips in the cards so that production knows what they have. No cameras in the table these days.
I'm not saying that she knew the cards, I doubt that she had any way of knowing. Probably just figured that the guy has nothing, worse than a j high, or she's a moron. I'd go with the latter on this one.
God you're dumb.
You can't be this fricking stupid. He was a 53% favorite because there are more winning cards for him than her. WTF do you mean you don't know what is in the deck? How do you think odds are calculated? You look at the cards you can see and those aren't in the deck. The rest are. Also, if you would bet $100k on a coin flip, why don't you go do that? You can bet red on roulette all you like. You will go broke playing that way.
Just the two of them at the table and this was the first hand out of a fresh deck?
You really are stupid. How many decks do you think they use? Do you think they shuffle 500 hundred cards at a time? Then why can't people make 5 of a kind? Whatever other players threw away is irrelevant because it can't be known. That's not how poker odds are calculated. And it was only like a five person deck. I can tell you've never played poker in your life.
You sound really defensive about a simple question. Is it because an honest answer to that question makes you look very foolish? Is that why you resorted to personal attacks instead of a simple answer? I think we all know the answer.
It's unfathomably stupid to think they could use multiple decks in a hand of poker, and proves that all of you saying she didn't cheat are idiots.
Well, if that's what proves it then she's sol.
Oh shit, I misread this, you're trying to intimidate that people think you play poker with multiple decks at a time. A fresh deck means it was opened at the table at the game, so the cards are not tampered with beforehand you miserable gaslighting looser.
You're the moron. The odds are calculated by taking into account all the cards from the other players that were already out of the deck. In this particular instance it favored him, but not on average. I'd wipe the floor with you at poker.
Wrong. That's not how you calculate when you are actually playing.
I'm telling you where that 53% on the screen came from. On average that hand has ~40%.
He went all in with an 8 high. Putting all your faith in draws is also a good way to go broke.
Yeah, but if he had lost to ace high then no one would be talking about this hand. It would have been an awesome hero call and nothing more.
OMG you people are stupid. HE HAD 21 OUTS. That's over half the remaining deck. This is a standard play. 1/8 of his stack for all her money.
WRONG. He had 21 outs. That's over half the deck as she had nothing. That's over 50% to win. And seeing how they ran the river twice, he was like 70% to win.
SO WHY DO YOU THINK THIS SUPPORTS THE THEORY OF HER CHEATING
meh. a little less next time
you fricking moronic Black person. have a nice day.
Still 69% on the second river.
And 45% is in between 40% and 50%, so we were both equally off.
I have nothing against his play. I’m just saying that when he moved all in, he had nothing. He was playing a game of luck. Maybe what he did is considered standard but I don’t get why he’s reacted the way he did. He didn’t hit on the river so all he had was an 8 high. You know how many different hands beat an 8 high?
It's not about what he had, it's about what she had. He was laughing until he saw her turn her hand over. And the most damning thing was when asked why she called, she said because she thought he had ace high, which beats her hand.
Yeah, it made him look really stupid.
phil helmuth says playing wrong like that is bad for the game
She acted bizarrely throughout the hand. Afterwards she returned the money from the hand and her story explaining what happened changes every time she's told it.
>Tribal nature
Kek, if that were the case, he wouldn't have got booted second in the 28th season of Survivor (Cagayan)
Yeah, he was super moronic. If you remember, he tried to "ban" strategy discussions and got kicked over the diversity-hire "rocket scientist" who chimped out and dumped all their rice. Homoboy cried about not getting served chicken and vegetables. Hilarity all around.
>NOOOO YOURE SUPPOSED TO BE A BLIND SLAVE TO POKER STATS AND STRATEGY LIKE SOME CHINK BUGMAN
Dude was just salty that a bimboid made him look stupid as frick.
i absolutely love the seethe from armchair poker experts online b***hing about this, best seethe since helmuth's old explosions
>get invited to a company poker night
>have no idea what I'm doing
>go all in as soon as I start
>call
>everyone else says I can't call as soon as the game starts
>keep calling
>everyone folds out of frustration
>show my hand and say "go fish"
>win $200
>they ban me from poker night
>still don't know if my hand was good or not
Should have complained to HR and start throwing hissy fits until the company settles something, then quit the job
They were just jealous of how good you are at POKAH.
>go all in as soon as i start
>call
did you go all in and then try to call your own raise?
im confused
Maybe learn the basic terms in poker before inventing a leddit upvote story.
>go all in
>call
cant even lie correctly
i did this with friends recently on a poker game on steam
>spend an hour on the character creator
>go all in ASAP without looking at my cards
>hit random buttons until everyone folds or sees or whatever they do
>win
>don't immediately retire
>lose repeatedly for 3 hours
For me, it's
?t=807
that hurts. I would wake up thinking about that hand for the rest of my days.
what do you mean she returned the money from the hand? Like after the game was finished?
The one before it hurts even more for me. He knew the 6 was coming. He could feel it.
Goddamn what a sick beatdown
Hellmuth is such a colossal homosexual. How the frick has no one bashed this guys head in yet
>noooo you can't just call me stupid for making stupid plays
Hellmuth is the only honest player there is.
I wonder what is the statistic chance of one player having quad aces and another having a royal flush that shit is crazy.
they say it at the end, 1:2,700,000,000
How about this?
>only thing that could make worse if a 9 comes up on the river
lmao
That Hellmuth needs a good hiding.
That’s a bad fricking beat right there.
That’s why you shouldn’t slow play pocket rockets.
I don't get it is he just pissed that he lost in a dumb way?
She called on a hand that had almost no chance of winning but won anyway. He got buttblasted and thinks the only reason she called is because she was cheating somehow and knew that his hand was also bad.
>She called on a hand that had almost no chance of winning but won anyway.
The computer probability was above 40% or whatever. That's not almost no chance.
morons can't comprehend live play and it's the best thing going for poker right now
Against that one hand, but she shouldn't be able to see his cards. He has a whole range of hands he could have at that moment and she loses to most of them.
most, but not all apparently
At that level of poker, there is something extremely infuriating when someone is actually too dumb for the game. It's almost like they're playing by different rules.
That's literally what beginners' luck is. Same thing happens in chess all the time. It's also the exact reason fighting game autists get mad about "button mashing"
Not exactly the same thing.
Most fighting game autists don't get mad at spamming or button mashing, most fighting game aside from shit like DOA punish nooby playstyles pretty hard.
>Same thing happens in chess all the time.
Holy fricking shit you must suck at chess. Please don't ever say anything about chess again until you have an elo over 1000
>chess is a game of luck
these threads are really bringing the absolute fricking morons out of the woodwork
I'm sorry you have autism and take into figure of speech
That's just wrong. I can easily stomp any beginner at chess.
You're probably one of those loosers that makes a friendly game of chess last two hours because you sit there for five minutes between every move, sooooo boring.
It is not rational to call bluffs with Jack high on that board unless you have an extremely good read on the other person's hand. It was like a $100,000 hand so Garret was naturally sus that she saw his hand or what had led her to do that
>Pro player literally can't even conceal his own cards well
Jesus
>literally robs a woman of 129k on camera in a room for of witnesses that's livestreamed to the entire world
>nobody does anything
Its more complicated than that. Not only did she have a dogshit hand, while she explained her moves, her reasoning didn't really make sense either. Most people who know something about poker seem to agree, its either she is moronic or she cheated.
It comes down to this
Being moronic in poker is cheating.
No, but being this moronic at this high a stakes game, lucking out in 6 figures, and not keeping your story straight on your own strategy after the hand is suspicious
>NOOOO YOU PLAYED WRONG YOU CAN'T WIN LIKE THAT REEEE
sorry chief it's poker, luck wins a lot. a dumbass that knows nothing can bytfo at anytime deal with it.
this dude is literally seething in multiple threads about this lmao like touch a tiddy homie damn
>hurr durr have sex
That's not an argument you Black person
LOOK AT THOSE HECKIN HONKERINOS
/thread
too bad 4chinners.com/televisions/ will continue to seethe because they're affraid to get me too'd by women
I'm not giving the video views until you give me a qrd of how she cheated. Being unpredictably moronic is not cheating.
being an unpredictable moron at the perfect moment and then changing the reason she called multiple times. also some connections with other people at the table and maybe with the casino
So she's a super spy master con man thief like danny ocean, gooooot it
I think she just got caught up in knowing he was bluffing her, and how her hand actually played vs his bluffs was secondary to catching him out in her mind because she's a crayon brain
>she is moronic or she cheated.
She's a woman anon, is it beyond all conceivable possibility that she is really just that dumb?
>moronic or cheating
It's a game chance. You can always blind moron your way to victory.
>she's a moron of she cheated
She obviously isn't a moron if she won the hand. The guy is a fricking moron for going in with what he had
>Most people who know something about poker seem to agree
holy cope
Since when did betting become about fricking showmanship lmao
she won fair and square and called the homosexuals bluff with a poker face.
dude obviously has a micropenis
Exactly. Luck of the draw
>play game professionally
>Lose
>omg you are cheating I cant lose!
Why is this so common these days?
A game of chance and odds no less, what a fricking moronic c**t.
Where is the webm?
sometimes being a moronic moron is the only winning move. i learned this by being myself
>Bluff
>Opponent bluffs back
>Keep bullshitting and leave it up to luck
>Opponent wins
>Shit your diaper
That's literally poker
How is calling an all-in hand bluffing?
its bluffing if you call with something that doesn't beat it which she did basically.
The entire point of a bluff is to trick your opponent into folding. There was no opportunity for him to fold, since she called his all in, therefore it was not a bluff.
I'm sure he's just pretending to be moronic.
>Shows cleavage
>Gets distracted
>Loses hand
>becomes confused and irate
Man was bested and he couldn’t admit it, I wish she hadn’t given the money back although it is a bigdick swing
theres just one flaw in your reasoning holmes
the man in question is...peculiar
>I wish she hadn’t given the money back
She gave the money back? Christ
I live in socal and I have a strong desire to drive to Las Vegas for a day and play blackjack because I don't really remember the rules for poker lol
Why drive all the way to vegas when there is commerce and all sorts of indian casinos in state now.
>I read him
>I put him on ace high
>No my hand would have lost thats why I called
>No see I had a blocker for the straight flush
She's moronic and barely knows what she is doing. Cheated
>Tribal nature comes out
is he Cherokee?
Can someone explain why Poker is so popular? It's just a chance game. I play Riichi Mahjong, at least there's some control in that game (not a great deal I will admit)
It's not just a chance game. You can't play the cards, but you can play the players.
Why don't players just refuse to table talk and wear a full face mask so they can't be read?
Because then they can't trick other players. Some people do wear hats and sunglasses and refuse to speak though.
they've done studies and the winning hand only wins in poker about 1/5th of the time
There's actually quite a bit of skill/knowledge behind Texas Hold 'Em, knowing your outs and chances etc. You can also read players irl, but there's a reason even online poker has people who consistently make money.
It's not just a chance game. That's a low IQ understanding of it.
Yeah, that’s why the same 5 players keep showing up at the final table in tournaments year after year
>why the same 5 players keep showing up at the final table in tournaments year after year
Collusion. Like what just happened when she gave the money she won fair and square back. They don't let certain players fail and push them up as "superstars".
That's just her being a woman, world series of poker had a wildcard in every tournament. People like Justin Schwartz were allowed on TV and if that walking nurgle spawn is on, anyone can be.
kek i forgot about that absolute sperg, gonna go watch him tism out to remind myself
>I dont do handshakes people
This thread proves why it's the case, anyone that doesn't follow their arbitrary rules on top of the poker rules get chased out and even have to fricking return money for beating the established pros with non-meta moves
Poker is a game of chance over 10 hands and a game of skill over 100,000 hands
Lmao, this guy was second voted out in Survivor.
>whiny c**t
I'm not surprised.
She's wearing a vag vibrator
she so fricking plastic and hot
I don't think vibrators are that strong without being loud enough to hear.
I'm not saying they are. The way she is jerking around is suspiciously similar to the movement women make when their c**t is being stimulated.
How many women have you 'stimulated", anon
I love how the Magnus debacle brought this to the forefront of mainstream consciousness.
extremely low IQ
>play a game that is 99% about RNG and luck
>lose because of luck
>"OMG WHAT THE FRICK THAT'S CHEATING!""
??????
>beats the guy so badly she refunds him 100k
A b***h with some semblance of a soul
nah that's just gay, I would've told him to seethe harder
I thought these kind of things were on a delay? How could an accomplice know his cards?
being live at the event and supposedly 'seeing' the cards from the audience
So "pro" poker players (that is clique players) get mad when someone outside the clique make use of risky plays?
Isn't poker all about risks and calling bluffs?
yes but don't tell them that or they'll screech that you didn't play 'correctly'
"Pro" poker players can't even accept that their game is a more complicated and more arbitrary game of Bullshit. The fact that Robbi needed to give a reason for why she called is dumb, it'd be like having to explain why you did a wake up dragon punch.
this was a risky as frick call. even if she knew garrett was bluffing her hand still lost to a lot of hands that he could be bluffing with.
>this was a risky as frick call.
So? Clearly it was the right move and the risk she took was worth it. She called his bluff, no matter of it was dumb of her or not.
I seriously don't understand this, are pro players so far up their own asses and have their own arbitrary ways of playing that if you don't play perfectly safe in a game all about bluffing and taking risks....you're cheating?
She won one hand, but if she continues to play like this she will lose money. You can play like a risky moron all you, but eventually chance is going to catch up with you. That is why it is better to play smart and mitigate your losses.
you're also clearly using a vibrator with someone in the audience who has superman's x-ray vision or equivalent technology to cheat in real time
OR
and hear me out
she's just a dumb b***h who made several dumb b***h plays during the entire event.
Nah you get it anon. I hate to keep making fighting game comparisons, but midwits will scream and cry that they're getting bodied by morons who basically don't know the meta well enough to be a slave to it, that blind moronery and unpredictability is almost more dangerous than a fine tuned pro. Morons can't be conditioned and trained to screw themselves over, instead they'll do what is probably highly illogical, and still make you look stupid because you were a slave to the meta or what "you should be doing" which ultimate is just a homosexual cope for being bad and not knowing that your moron opponent would do some moronic shit.
Even if she knew 100% for sure it was a bluff then realistically she can beat 87, 76, 65, 54, maybe 86, 75, 64
That's it. Every other single playable hand he could have she loses to. Even with the hands played face up it's still a 50:50 unprofitable call.
It you're gonna cheat wait for a much, much better moment.
>are pro players really so far up their own asses
Yes. For people like Phil Helmuth and other pros, there’s certain things you are supposed to do at certain times. They base every move they make on assuming everyone at the table adheres to this. So if you raise Phil Helmuth or he raises you and you call, he looks at the board and assumes he knows exactly what you have. If you don’t have what he expects you to have, he’s going to b***h and cry about how you don’t know how to play poker. They are pretentious buttholes and even if you win the pot they will say you didn’t play the hand correctly. As far as I’m concerned, anything you do that moves the chips from their stack into yours is the correct move. Going all in with 2 7 off suit is the right move if you win.
Didn't she have more chips than he did? Like even if she lost that hand with his all in she would have survived, whereas he was betting all his chips. So less risky kn her part.
No she was in for all of her money
His bluff was risky, but calling with jack high is way more risky. He wanted her to fold without the cards being shown while she needs to have a better hand which isn't likely.
I watched the video again.
He had $801k prior to going all in and she had only $109k.
Why would the moron go all in? Why wouldn't he just bet $109k, which was all her money?
even if he went all in and she called, she would have only won the equivalent of her own hand
unless there is some more moronic house rule I don't understand
In that case why was he acting like a sperg? He would only have been down to around $600k and still be ahead of her.
jews gonna israelite
because the call literally only beats his hand. any other hand he could have been bluffing with destroys her odds wise. no one with half a brain would call in that spot.
>NOO IT WAS MATHEMATICALLY A BAD MOVE TO DO! THIS GAME IS NOT ABOUT RISKS OR LUCK!
it is a moronic play that she got lucky with, but being moronic in poker will only lead you to losing money in the long run
when he goes all in it basically means all of her chips only. he didn't lose all of his chips
LMAO sorry but that's hilarious. As other anons pointed out she only has 109k so even if he puts 800k in and loses he only loses 109k. That's why sometimes in all in scenarios they'll pause for a minute to count up each persons chips
I shocked someone with a J high win online because I knew he was going to bluff before he did it and I just did not give a frick because their bluffs had me tilted so I snap called an all in and he was blown away
I kind of get it. Playing against odds too much is suicidal and can screw up the whole table chip-wise and psychology-wise since you just invited a shit-fest that takes skill away from play. And you don't play that way if you want to *keep* playing high level poker because playing like that does just usually make you lose. Essentially if you have 5 people playing you're making everyone more like 20% chance to win with you in a pot. But capping yourself at 20% is a shit idea for a pro. In the long run you're not doing yourself any favors, and you're fricking the table up short term. Which, whatever if you're just trying to make quick cash off a game. But I can see why it annoys more serious players.
Who gives a frick. Thats the life of a pro sometimes you get a mark that is a complete wildcard and youre going to cry about your profit margin but will brag about stealing the shirt off another mark. Frick off and go cry a river.
I mean pros mostly play with other pros who aren't about to go into bankruptcy from a tournament game
His biggest mistake was assuming she knew what she was doing in the first place. She wasn't cheating, shes an idiot woman who barely knows how poker even fricking works.
Even if she did know his hand it's still a shit call.
Wasn't he doing a "dumb" risky play, and she just called him out on it? His play was more risky than hers
But he knows what he's doing so he's allowed to be reckless and do dumb shit because it's intentional 9th dimensional thinking! When she does idiot woman playing poker move it's cheating!
you dont understand bro you cant just call a bet a bro you can ONLY bet with a bad hand you cant CALL with a bad hand you wouldnt get it poker is just so high iq and high skill no its not luck
GIVE ME MY MONEY, YOU HAD NO REASON TO CALL, I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GO ALL IN ON A moronic HAND AND ALWAYS WIN!
it is almost like bluffing and calling are two different things
They really aren't though.
You bluff hoping they fold, because you have nothing. You call because you believe you have enough to beat the opponents hand.
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONO SHE'S A WOMAN
>NOOOOO YOU CANT JUST CALL WITH JACK HIGH
lol
pic related but with women
Who went all in first? If it was the dude, he's the supreme moron in this situation
You clearly know nothing about poker. He had a straight flush draw. She absolutely fricking nothing. No made hands and no draws. Of course, she technically had the better hand at that point because she had jack high over 8 high but there's absolutely no way she should have banked on that. It's possible, but it's simply not worth the risk to call in that situation. She did and got extremely lucky.
>draw
>a chance to maybe get a hand
>one person gets lucky
oh wow, color me shocked
If this happened and he made the flush it would be a non issue so shut the frick up you mongoloid
Him going all-in is an absolute standard play. It's called a semi-bluff. You're simultaneously trying to represent that you have a much stronger hand than you actually do as the board stands, but at the same time you know that your hand could improve drastically with the right river card.
People bet in the hopes that their hand will improve by the river. If everyone just checked until they clearly had a made hand then you would be super predictable to play against and wouldn't get anyone to put money into the pot.
>standard play
>REE DON'T GAMBLE
My friend you are moronic, just accept that she's a luck sack and it was a bad beat
>bet all your money on black
>it lands on red
WHAT THE FRICK HOUSE IS CHEATING I WAS SUPPOSE TO WIN THERE'S NO WAY I COULD LOSE THIS!
>She's a bimbo she can't be that smart! She must have cheated
It wasn't a smart, it was lucky.
Where do I watch these games?
Hustler Casino Live
twitch unfortunately
Really...?
Does it stream anywhere? Tubi or some shit?
Youtube
>make a risky play
>expect it to go through because this is the "meta"
>someone is too moronic or too smart and sees it through
NOOOOOOOOO YOU ARE SUPPOSE TO BLINDLY FOLLOW THE META, THIS GAME IS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE ABOUT RISKS AND LUCK!
NOOOOO SHE HAD JACK HIGH! I COULD HAVE HAD QUEEN HIGH OR KING HIGH IT MAKES NO SENSE
>Poker is all luck
Poker is all luck.....and lying. There is no skill associated with the card portion of poker, it's just "thee are your cards, now convince everyone in the room that you have the best cards" if you're a true pro this means things get kaiji levels of internal card counting and remembering hands, but at the end of the day, if you got shit cards, and your opponent is too busy enjoying a big O from her veganal Annihilator to notice your totally epic pro gamer bluff then that's still on you bubba
Poker is luck and basic probability.
When you cry to the judges and then force a woman to return all of the money you lost I guess anyone can be a winner.
>has shit hand
>Has considerably more money than her
>Goes all in
Idk, sounds like an obvious tell on its own
It could be a tell. Just knowing that someone tends to try and strong arm players when they have more chips.
That's not what happened though, she misread her hand. Lol
Sure but I think there's enough to draw on without involving the FBI
>has shit hand
He had a straight flush draw. His hand had so many potential outs on the river whereas she had fricking nothing.
Jesus. I can't take any more of these shit poker takes from people who know nothing. Why are you all so fricking moronic? It's not rocker science or quantum physics. It's fricking basic mathematical principles.
Sounds like you got out skilled bub
This thread is peak Dunning-Kruger. They see the cards on the side and think they understand what is going on.
maybe you are dunning kruger urself you sound very confident
If his move was so great, how come he lost?
He lost one pot. He still is still up 1 million dollars in earnings for the stream
So why was/is he seething about the move then?
he thinks she is cheating because the play was so moronic
>she made the right move
>"s-she is so dumb, how could she through my bluffing!"
Why even play a luck based game if you're going to seethe the moment you lose RNG? Even if there's a 5% chance you won't win, that 5% will happen eventually no matter how much the odds are in your favor.
he has lost way bigger pots and has not lost his shit. calling with jack high for $100,000 is moronic.
Obviously not as she won?
yeah you can also win russian roulette it still doesn't make it smart move in the long term
You don't win "big" by doing small unrisky plays all the time, that is only for pro players in the clique. She is not part of that so expecting her to play like one of them is more moronic than anything.
making $100,000 calls with jack high will end with you losing all of your money in the long run. there is making big plays and then there is being moronic.
But she won?
>Why do only the same few clique people show up to play against each other and split the pricepool in this clique scene
you tell me
she won one pot, but if you are making calls with jack high you better hope you have other sources of income
Because he got fricking styled on for a bad lie lmao
NO YOU DONT UNDERSTASND POKER RREEEEEE
His move wasn't great, in fact he played his hand pretty poorly. He was banking on the next card making his hand but it didn't so he had nothing and rekt himself. It's just kind of stupid form to bet big on hope. From my understanding they're friends and she probably figured out he was waiting on a flush that never came. Still to go all in with Jack high in that spot is pretty ballsy. He's mainly pissed cause she read him like a book and also had the balls to call him
explain why he all-inned and created the circumstances that led to this outcome?
This video was so kino. This woman has such a shit hand and just goes "whatever" and this autists brain completely melts, he literally cannot process going all in when you don't have anything.
It's not completely out of the ordinary to assume someone is bluffing, especially when 130 grand is at stake.
a friend of mine would punch holes in walls when i won with hands i had no business playing.
it really raises the question of who exactly had the autism
He literally made her give the money she won back to him. WTF?
toxic masculinity at work on the bimbos in the poker world
She's lucky she didn't walk away with irish sunglasses
>NOOOOOO YOU CANT CALL A BLUFF NOOOOOO HIS nothing should beat HER nothing!!!!!!
fricking kek pokercels would lose a fight to someone just feinting them over and over again
>Guy goes all in
>Someone asks him if he looked at his cards
>He says no
>Other guy believes him
>Calls
>Loses
Who was in the wrong?
Kek that Tony G is some kind of UN ambassador now. hilarious
Bender for being dealt the king of beers
Jennifer Tilly.She should of flopped her breasts out and gave everyone a nice suck.
>player gambles in a gambling game
>everybody loses their minds
just launch world war 3 ffs
No you see, the guy was playing so well it wasn't even gambling, he should just win, and as such they're giving him the grand prize!
She didn't cheat the hand, but the real scandal is her giving back the money. That means there's collusion going on, and that's where the real cheating is happening. Which is why one of the other players protested and caused a scene.
It also means that the "pros" being pushed to the top of the earnings are probably not actually the best but are being pushed to the top in rigged games, similar to what happens in boxing and maybe mma/ufc.
This is going to be some kind of case study in 100 years that 19th wave feminists use to prove the patriarchy because a better player was bullied into giving her money back to a man because he strongarmed her
I know nothing about poker, but I like her giant booba
If she didn't cheat, why did she return the money?
because it's a design scam between the two of them
Did you watch the video? Dude death glared her for 3 minutes with the entire room watching. She probably didn't want to get jumped on the way to her Uber.
They're business partners or something so I guess she didn't wanna piss him off too bad. Still scandalous as frick though
frick that fricking salty israelite
People (who know fricking nothing about poker) are trying to make it out like he gave her a death glare and then had a hissyfit because he lost unexpectedly or got a bad beat, or is some kind of sexist who hates losing to women.
The truth is that his look after seeing her hand is one of utter bewilderment. Like he cannot process what has just happened because she called with a hand that literally makes no sense and in fact would only make sense if you could see your opponent's cards.
Garrett has lost plenty of huge pots to weaker players and got bad beats and been totally gracious about it and never freaked out before. I remember he lost a set over set hand. He had a set of 4's and his opponent had a set of 5's and he lost huge and looked a bit annoyed but said "nice hand" and never lost his cool even though his opponent kept needling him and berating him for how he played the hand.
So why did he force her to give back "his" money?
why did she give back the money
She's a woman, they have weak minds
most likely scenario:
he sponsors her to get a percentage on the side of whatever prostitute ass twitch stream she does, or she took lessons from him and is evening the playing field when it comes to who gets to be in 'the show' when the big tourneys come up
least likely:
she cheated, felt bad, and returned the money
Yeah he's one of those arsehole "nice guys" who thinks being nicer than most people would be in most situations means he can be a total, criminal arsehole in this situation. But it's OK because everyone knows he's a "nice guy".
>trying to make it out like he gave her a death glare
You don't even have to pretend body language is a science to notice his entire demeanor change in the span of a second. Dude is toying with her one second and the next he's not even blinking.
>Dude is toying with her one second and the next he's not even blinking.
He wasn't "toying with her". He fully expected to lose the hand and was laughing about it. He laughed when he said "I have 8 high." This is after he has seen both river cards and knows that his hand is no good. He is still waiting to see what she has at this point but he basically assumes that she has him beat.
His demeanor only changes when he sees what she has. It doesn't change when he knows that he is beat.
>He fully expected to lose the hand and was laughing about it
No, I don't think that's the case. Good fanfiction though.
He was perfectly fine with losing until she showed her cards
>he was fine with losing except for losing like that
You're unbelievably stupid.
Lmao. You've literally never watched poker before, have you? Garrett is an extremely aggressive player and bluffs quite often. Of course he doesn't expect to win every hand playing such an aggressive style. It's a part of the game.
There are literally hundreds of hands you can go back and watch him lose and be nothing but cordial to his opponent, because his opponent had a hand that makes sense.
>You've literally never watched poker before, have you?
I know that being "okay with losing" doesn't involve staring with dead eyes at the person who beat your shitty bluff.
>this lack of reading comprehension
Simply has to be trolling. Good job, anon. You baited me.
Please don't rape any women tonight, Greg.
When he sees her hand he realises that either she's the biggest moron to ever play the game or she's cheating. Live stream games have been cheated before.
>When he sees her hand he realises that either she's the biggest moron to ever play the game or she's cheating
That sounds like a bad loser coping.
I've seen Garrett lose tons of hands to worse players than him and he has never reacted like this.
No, calling with jack high for $100,000 is extremely moronic
Especially considering she beat his hand
If she called with any pair or any draw he smiles and shakes it off. What's really funny about this situation is this guy is basically the Captain America of poker who always does and says the right thing at the table and doesn't get angry or upset. Now he's going to get completely bodied by bluechecks on Twitter for the next week.
This is after he had already seen both river cards. Of course he expected to lose the hand because all he had on both run-outs was 8 high. The river card was a brick both times.
Why would he expect to win?
Remember that both players didn't show their cards until after they had seen the river cards.
Apparently he cornered her, even if he didn't it still makes sense if her story is true and she misread her hand and feels bad.
cuz she felt guilty obviously. but don't tell that to the turbo-SIMPs in this threads. In their pursuit to be contrarian, they're literally gaslighting their own gender in a classic Believe All Women scenario.
Many such cases
>Play black jack
>got 20
>stay because that's the smart move to do
>dealer gets 21
NOOOOO THIS IS CHEATING, MATHEMATICALLY I SHOULD BE WINNING NOW REEEEEEEEEEEEE
>pokercel spergs out with a paragraph explanation of why the b***h played moronic
>"but she won?"
>cue seethe
everytime
Did she win though? She just won a pot. I don't know how these things work.
she won over $100k
you know they play more then one hand? just because she won one doesn't mean the game is over.
The israelite gets so upset when some fricking schmendrick of a shiksa makes him look bad and takes some of his pretend-money (the money in these games isn't actual dollars).
it was a cash game not tournament
Poker is only 50% skill, 50% is luck. You can have a great hand, let's say a full house, and another player could possibly still have a better hand.
I've seen morons that don't even know how to play win hands out of sheer luck and make the rest of us "sharks" seethe. Actually, I find that the clueless ones actually have more lucky hands than the ones who can actually play. Some weird law of the universe
If poker wasn't a game of skill, then why is it dominated by men?
Why would a pro player expect an amateur to play like a pro player?
The people in the Olympics are amateurs. There's amateurs, and then there's amateurs.
It was high stakes
Any fellow pokergays ITT getting extremely tilted by the tidal wave of shit takes from people who think poker is basically equivalent to blackjack?
I'm trying to play a tournament on my phone and keep looking up at the screen to refresh this Goddamn thread.
>NOOOO DON'T TREAT THIS GAMBLE GAME ABOUT RISKS AND LUCK LIKE A GAMBLING GAME
Are you like some mormon who hates the idea of even setting up a game between friends? Did your dad just blow your Christmas money being a degenerate?
>Did your dad just blow your Christmas money being a degenerate?
Yeah.
get tilted and then go be a nit with your play, gay
I've been playing high stakes poker for 10 years and honestly I prefer Cinemaphile's takes to e.g. Doug Polk's takes.
We're just having fun shitposting here. You do whatever works for you.
>"I-I was only pretending to be moronic... it's all just jokes and memes, bro... trust me."
I didn't say that.
>Playing tournaments
>On your phone
Real pokercels look at you with disgust.
It's obviously extremely low stakes, otherwise I wouldn't be shitposting on an Uzbekistani kayaking forum simultaneously, would I?
>She cheated
How?
Luck plays a part in everything. She got lucky, moron couldn't handle it.
he already lost like 500k to her, why would he assume she's stupid
i think people are underestimating how pinned a person can have you in your play no matter what
Some people just fricking get you and you are absolutely buttfricked to go against them
1 hand
>Tribal nature comes out and starts flinging accusations to get his shekels back
>play Puzzle pirates with a friend
>go to a poker table with them
>coordinate with the friend and cheat everyone out of their gold
good times
do a lot of people still play puzzle pirates
No idea
I just tried it a couple months back, there's only one active server which sees between 100-200 people on at once, maybe 200-300 at peak times. Holy shit I miss Puzzle Pirates so fricking badly I would sell my soul for it to be active again it fricking hurts bros pokergays get the rope though
>making a "sport" out of literal gambling
>inb4 muh variation and gto
It's amazing how much brain rot can be induced to the average autist
This thread is Cinemaphile incarnate. I bunch of people who know nothing about poker using their hatred of israelites and women to make up a fake narrative and ignore all of the poker players in the thread. The fact is, she said she thought he had Ace high when she called, which would mean she called all in with the losing hand, which makes no sense, and it's very obvious she cheated, especially after she gave the money back.
How did she cheat?
Bagina
I don't know. Could have had a device that virated when she had the winning hand and someone intercepting the broadcast.
there's a delay so it basically has to be someone in the game.
and as has been pointed out, they went all in after the turn, and she wasn't even favored to win after the last card. so whoever was signalling her would have to know what card was about to be dealt. also they ran it twice so they would have to know the next two cards taht would be dealt. and would have to signal all thsi information into her sweet wet pussy.
so people who say she is cheating are really making quite a claim
It could be someone in the boradcast. It could be ay number of things. The fact is, what she said doesn't add up, and giving the money back is a tacit admission of guilt.
someone in the broadcast knows the order of cards to be dealt?
Or she misspoke and the dude needs money
He make
s over a million a year, cash.
This is after he threatened her until she gave the money back.
Why did she win?
If you make millions, it doesn't mean you don't owe millions, and maybe to people who will get their money
Nothing you said is even hard to do - especially since audience members probably don't get a significant delay. Stop pretending it's like some fricking Ocean's 11 play.
There are hundred of ways to cheat in this situation. Most probably she didn't do any of them and had a certified woman moment and got very lucky.
No, stop saying woman like that makes sense, Why would she say she called because she thought he had Ace high when ace high beats her? For all her money?
Because she's an airhead bimbo trying to say anything to justify her moronation. Just look at her ffs.
THAT DOESN'T JUSTIFY HER moronATION IT LITERALLY DOES THE OPPOSITE JESUS FRICKING CHRIST. Pokerlet incels are pathetic.
people are saying she is moronic, and not a cheater, just moronic. its two separate issues.
moronic yes. cheater no.
>people are saying she is moronic
Why did she won then?
morons win all the time. do you know how many special olympic gold medalists i have banged
Because poker players are moronic
The biggest issue is that she gave the money back to him for some reason, that's not something anyone does if they won it fair and square, even if stupidly.
giving the money back supports not just the cheater theory but also the moron theory
probably supports the moron theory more strongly
Yeah, he would have to pry the money out of my cold dead. yet strangely vibrating fingers.
That's irrelevant. There is no pro player who would ever do this. There is no amatuer player who would do this. Who would call all their money thinking they were beat? Explain that.
Why dont you just prove they cheated so the thread can end?
A woman
i really can't understand why poker gays don't get this one simple concept
Plenty of great women poker players.
and there are plenty of dumb ones too, so you're going to get mad that this bimbo got one over on some homosexual?
If you saw what the average professional poker player looked like in 2022 you'd understand.
Literally the only circumstance I could see this happening (outside of people misreading their hands or misclicking, or not giving a frick and just button mashing) would only be in a low stakes game (not for fricking over $100,000 live on a stream in front of the entire world) and if you are way, way ahead of your opponent in terms of your stack size so it's not that much of a risk, and/or you know that he is overbluffing or on monkey tilt and likely to having a complete random hand like 7, 2 offsuit. In that scenario, you might call expecting to lose but you just want to information.
Outside of that, it is literally one of the most insane, nonsensical calls ever in the history of high stakes poker, hence why it's literally the only thing the poker community has been talking about for the past couple of days. It's like the poker world's Russian invasion of Ukraine, except that actually even made more sense than what this does.
Esoteric terminology, "poker community", I never took golf seriously but still beat some of my pro friends, sometimes humans are just humans and not olympian robots
it's much more likely she's a moronic w*man who has no idea what she's doing rather than she was cheating. women are dumb animals and are not competent at anything
>women are dumb animals and are not competent at anything
No, they are evil and two-faced, not dumb. They'll flat out tell you one thing and tell everyone else another thing.
>I've met your people in Vegas for 40 years, none of them have last names, none of them. They have cash fulls of udhgha, you're a poker player, a poker player. That's beyond white trash. Poker players...poker players are trash darling, trash.
Joan Rivers was right.
Annie Duke has way more talent than Joan fricking Rivers.
I am not crazy! I know she cheated that hand! I knew it was for 129k. One after Magna Carta. As if I could ever make such a mistake. Never. Never! I just - I just couldn't prove it. She - she covered her tracks, she got those idiots who don't play poker to lie for her. You think this is something? You think this is bad? This? This chicanery? She's done worse. Those breasts! Are you telling me that a woman just happens to have natural D cups? No! She operated it! Robbi! She called on Jack high! And I defended her! And I shouldn't have. I took her into my own post! What was I thinking? She'll never change. She'll never change! Ever since she was 9, always the same! Couldn't keep her hands out of the Botox! But not our Robbi! Couldn't be precious Robbi! Stealing them blind! And she gets to be a poker pro? What a sick joke! I should've stopped her when I had the chance! And you - you have to stop her! You-
Could use some polish, breddy gud
>Be moronic
>Dude all ins after smiling the whole time
>Suddenly his whole demeanor changes
>Makes a moronic face while he all ins
>Call him because you're moronic
>Get a lucky flop
>Win
>Wahhh why did you call me what the frick
It's literally a game of chance. What do you expect. I play VR poker and all my friends are better but sometimes my moronic ass pulls some crazy shit.
You can't even recount what happened. I love guys like you so much. I played for a living for 4 years and you guys made my life so easy, especially in pot limit Omaha. Just sit back and wait for the best hand and then watch you call all your money away. Oh wait, you're too stupid and too much of a b***h to play with real money.
>VR chat
>Friends
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA fricking troony
god that creature is ugly
If there was ever a guy in poker who doesn't deserve the shitstorm that's headed his way it's Garrett. Good job he's israeli.