not a woman but I have 2 sisters who both got fake breasts and their only justification for it is "confidence". I think it's a flimsy excuse but then again I don't have a woman's brain so whatever. short guys get brutal leg surgery just to be taller, bald guys take weird chemical wienertails to keep their hair, etc. that's life for you.
I’ll tell you. Women doll themselves up to show off to other women. You know how they get those hideous 4 inch fake nails? No guy thinks that looks good. They just do it as the veganal equivalent of dick waiving at each other. Same goes for any other superficial crap - israeliteelry, fake eyebrows, padded jeans, fake breasts, etc. It doesn’t have to look ‘better’ to still be a flex.
Judging from random comments, somehow it doesn't cross any line for them, it's like getting their hair dyed. They don't realize how obvious and weird it is to be unrecognizable like they're a clone or something.
KINOOOOO
I thought 2016 would have a scene like this
gosh i fricking love this movie, gonna watch it again
>Anna Biller is an American filmmaker who wrote and directed the feature films Viva (2007) and The Love Witch (2016). Biller considers herself a feminist filmmaker and consciously explores feminist themes throughout her work, including exploring the female gaze in cinema.[1][2] She is vocal on both her website and in interviews about gender inequalities in the film industry.[3][4]
yeah i think i'm gonna skip this one. sorry!
she's married to a israeli pick-up artist lol >Robert Greene (born May 14, 1959) is an American author of books on strategy, power, and seduction.[1][2] He has written seven international bestsellers, including The 48 Laws of Power, The Art of Seduction, The 33 Strategies of War, The 50th Law (with rapper 50 Cent), Mastery, The Laws of Human Nature, and The Daily Laws.[3]
It's funny because if you didn't know the director was feminist you'd think this was an anti-feminist 70s softcore porno flick. It's pretty entertaining.
Um excuse me commie liberal troony Stalin but no. We don’t watch movies around here unless the director’s Wikipedia bio passes muster! Idc how kino they are, or how much they offer exactly what I constantly complain about being missing from modern film.
Did they use some filter to get that look or was it shot using some old camera?
Danger 5 had the same look to it
It wasn't, it's the same film stock everything is shot on these days, Kodak Vision3. It's the lighting, colorful production design, and going for a final grade that isn't the usual monochromatic bullshit you see today.
Why is it that every zoomer homosexual wants to throw AI onto every problem. You don't need AI for this kind of shit. All you need is a colour gradient map filter.
The director explains it here. Its mostly just hard light style with vintage lenses used
https://theasc.com/articles/the-magic-of-hard-lighting-for-the-love-witch
I think they just blasted tungsten or hmi lights on the actors faces, which is what a lot of older lower budget older films did. No bouncing the light or anything you see these days.
they hate her because it's like pulling teeth to get fricking anything done in the movie industry. People like Sharon Stone and Ed Norton get canceled for being hard to work with, other stars like Gibson get targeted for removal with methods that didn't exist in the 1970s. It's easier to tear things down than to build them up.
Seriously. You have to respect that Anna Biller did literally everything in The Love Witch except the cinematography. Surprised she didn’t give herself a cameo
>Anna Biller did literally everything in The Love Witch except the cinematography.
then what the frick are all the other names in the end credits doing there
(OP)
It is and it's also one of the most redpilled movies you'll ever watch because it shows the glib ruthlessness in the way some attractive women deal with and dispose of men.
Incredibly kino, funny, and meticulously crafted. Director spent years making the costumes and sets iirc. She’s married to the guy who wrote 48 Laws of Power. Also the Love Witch (Samantha Robinson) is insanely hot.
>>Poor baby 🙁 >I think it’d actually work on me
It would so fricking hard on me and it made me reflect on myself while watching. A "feminist" made the ultimate movie on female manipulation.
>need
Obviously you don't *need* to know about it. The thing is that people should shut up about shit they don't know about instead of spreading bullshit.
>and the guy that makes the movies to upload never mentions it
What the frick are you babbling about, ESL poster
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
what?
those guys that upload the movies on those private trackers never mention if it's technicolor
t. sitting the the east coast of the US and A sipping mocha marshmallow light roast
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
whoops
on the*
stupid speech to text app
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>those guys that upload the movies on those private trackers never mention if it's technicolor
So? Anyone who knows what Technicolor actually is can tell with their own eyes if the film is Technicolor or not.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
can you go into more detail why it matters? i'm a bit confused now.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You tired or drunk?
I already made my point:
>need
Obviously you don't *need* to know about it. The thing is that people should shut up about shit they don't know about instead of spreading bullshit.
>people should shut up about shit they don't know about instead of spreading bullshit.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>You tired or drunk?
no, i told you here
what?
those guys that upload the movies on those private trackers never mention if it's technicolor
t. sitting the the east coast of the US and A sipping mocha marshmallow light roast
i'm sipping a mocha marshmallow blend
now, can you go into detail why your eyes can see it and others can't?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>and others can't
Sure they can if they know what Technicolor is. Plenty of people do.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
so you can't explain your flavor of bullshit.
got it, good day sir.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Explain what? You're not asking the right questions. Anyone who knows what real Technicolor looks like can tell what is Technicolor.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
why?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Why what?
If you know what something looks like, you can recognize it. It's not rocket science, anon.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Watch enough actual Technicolor films from the 30s and 40s and soon it'll become easy to tell the look from other color films. It's a very distinct look after all.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
aren't they technically NOT in color?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The three-strip negatives are black & white, but the final interpositive (and the internegatives from which theatrical prints are made from) is of course in color.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
can you do this with BW film and color filters today? im curious to try a homebrew method
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You would need a three-strip camera. Not sure exactly what kind of printers and chemicals you'd need in the lab, but no one has done it in decades.
why did they dye plants shut down though?
Other methods replaced it. Three-strip is expensive and cumbersome. You need three times the film stock, shitloads of light, and a huge heavy camera. No wonder the process died soon after they figured how to make color films with a single negative.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>but no one has done it in decades.
Yep. The final true three-stip technicolor films came out in the 50s.
You would need a three-strip camera. Not sure exactly what kind of printers and chemicals you'd need in the lab, but no one has done it in decades.
[...]
Other methods replaced it. Three-strip is expensive and cumbersome. You need three times the film stock, shitloads of light, and a huge heavy camera. No wonder the process died soon after they figured how to make color films with a single negative.
The three-strip negatives are black & white, but the final interpositive (and the internegatives from which theatrical prints are made from) is of course in color.
Fun story, Disney had exclusive rights to "animation with three-strip technicolor" for a few years so other studios had to use two-strip, which produced some interesting results
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinecolor
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Other methods replaced it. Three-strip is expensive and cumbersome. You need three times the film stock, shitloads of light, and a huge heavy camera. No wonder the process died soon after they figured how to make color films with a single negative.
thank you
It's hard to explain, but I saw in The Love Witch a true feminist alternative. Her world is a utopia that stems from witchcraft being real, or made real. Witchcraft is obviously a metaphor for female power, but it's not that simple. The existence of magic symbolically releases the bonds of a modern scientific worldview -- schizos can be who they claim to be, the weak can be strong, the strong can be superheroes. People in her life aren't defined by their monetary value or their physical value, their agendas and spiritual lives dwarf mere mortality, as a result of living by this magic code. The pillars of the world are vast and inscrutable, tarot and the stars far beyond the reach of man. They hold up the sky and humans can only try to understand, through ancient crone wisdom.
My most favorable interpretation of a Klaus Schwab degrowth future is something like TLW. A vast forested California with mostly small towns, no visible industry and little work of any kind. No important media or knowledge of the outside world, except for what artist or event is coming to town. People live their lives in a delirium of festivals, drugs, magic, and star-ordained fate, watched over by elders and wise women. And everyone gets a beautiful girl at least once, though she might collect your head like a praying mantis.
>Her world is a utopia that stems from witchcraft being real, or made real. Witchcraft is obviously a metaphor for female power,
What does the pervy male witch leader guy represent? The yid creeps who pushed feminism onto the masses?
Truly a redpilled film.
He's a low status male who uses his spiritual power to get what he wants. The fact that he wants sex is valid because he's open about it, just like her not wanting to sleep with him. feminist morality 101
he's the "ally" that goes to feminist marches to try and get laid
He's the coven leader and rapes all the girls while spouting pathetic feminist ideology he clearly doesn't believe. He raped Elaine at her initiation. Most of the witches just want to LARP as being empowered beings attuned with nature but Elaine is a genuine schizo which is why she becomes a killer.
[...]
He's the coven leader and rapes all the girls while spouting pathetic feminist ideology he clearly doesn't believe. He raped Elaine at her initiation. Most of the witches just want to LARP as being empowered beings attuned with nature but Elaine is a genuine schizo which is why she becomes a killer.
they consented and he absolutely believes in getting women to consent to sex. Your mistake is thinking some higher moral standard exists, he's at the limit of his potential being an ugly guy. The fact that Elaine disagrees with him one one or two issues doesn't mean he's a villain or cancelled, pretty funny your main complaint is that he doesn't simp harder.
Oh no, not you again. While our aspiring LaVey isn't the actual villain of the piece (Elaine is), he's a manipulative piece of shit peddling brainrot to dumb broads, and you can deduce this from 30 seconds analysis of his role, and comparing the behavior of coven thots to Trish (they're pure cringe).
If Elaine is the villain and the whole thing is a cautionary tale, why did the crew not understand what they were doing? Why did they think it was morally ambiguous? They're professionals and should understand art. >30 second analysis of his role
I can hear your labored breathing
They're the crew. Their opinions are not required or asked for.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
what about the audience? Do we have anything from the director saying Elaine is the villain?
does anybody think that except you? No wait, I can do one better. Do YOU even think that? Maybe you're just trying to "beat" me. What makes you think she's a villain, the whole movie is about her. Mel Gibson is not the villain in Payback.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
That's an autistic concern. Authorial intent is often deliberately ambiguous. The fact that more than one person commonsensically assumes Elaine is the villain is obvious from several comments above and elsewhere-- I wasn't the other guy you were talking to btw.
Elaine is a villain in a mantis way-- her actions have an extreme aspect based on her unconcerned, sociopathic dating/mating strategy.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I only see one person stating outright that she's the villain. Even if her actions are ambiguous, and they are, the act of making a film is straightforward. Can you name two films where the main character is the villain, not an antihero but the main villain? It should be possible even if I'm right.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
(me)
Death Proof is my first thought, but the concept of an antihero is key.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Can you name two films where the main character is the villain, not an antihero but the main villain?
Joker, don't go into the house, Henry: portrait of a serial killer, maniac. You'll notice most of those are horror movies, and the love witch is a horror comedy.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Joker is an antihero
POV slasher flick is a good pick
Henry and jonah hill are antiheros
so that's one.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
In what respect is Henry an antihero? He's a low IQ murderer and rapist
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
michael rooker is hot
serial killers are hot
he's the active agent moving through the lives of less interesting people
When we've finished debating whether a villainous movie protagonist is even possible, we can get back to Elaine. Her so-called villainy is not tempered by any consequences, just the implication that she's wrong. That's what makes it an alternative view, it acknowledges reality. Suspiria isn't as consciously feminist because it's escapism to a world where magic is real. I think Elaine is a better feminist hero because of her flaws, and she's pretty far from being a straightforward villain.
>why did the crew not understand what they were doing? Why did they think it was morally ambiguous?
Maybe they're just stupid, like a lot of the critics. Biller's intent was to create a female serial killer who kills through clinginess. Her inspiration was female self-help magazines and their garbage advice.
>After Robinson accepted the role, she and Biller watched a series of classic movies featuring women with "great sociopathic performance"
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
What's the larger motive though? So she's a female serial killer, what does that say about love and gender relations? I guess nothing would be your answer, it's just a crime film to you. She's like Porter from Payback.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I already explained this movie to you once, I'm not bored enough to do it again.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
must not have been me. I'll accept your concession on his behalf though
Why did she ruin her nose bros
no one knose
It's bizarre that women will get surgery to look worse. Can any women in this thread explain? No women post here. MtF trannies aren't women.
not a woman but I have 2 sisters who both got fake breasts and their only justification for it is "confidence". I think it's a flimsy excuse but then again I don't have a woman's brain so whatever. short guys get brutal leg surgery just to be taller, bald guys take weird chemical wienertails to keep their hair, etc. that's life for you.
I’ll tell you. Women doll themselves up to show off to other women. You know how they get those hideous 4 inch fake nails? No guy thinks that looks good. They just do it as the veganal equivalent of dick waiving at each other. Same goes for any other superficial crap - israeliteelry, fake eyebrows, padded jeans, fake breasts, etc. It doesn’t have to look ‘better’ to still be a flex.
Judging from random comments, somehow it doesn't cross any line for them, it's like getting their hair dyed. They don't realize how obvious and weird it is to be unrecognizable like they're a clone or something.
It’s in character for Elaine.
it's weird cause looking at her IG she had her mom's nose and then posts about how much she loved her mom and misses her
It's a masterpiece.
KINOOOOO
I thought 2016 would have a scene like this
What a Chad.
It's worth watching. It's like a fever dream, and the actress is hot, HOT.
There is a godess.
>taking off the stockings
Ruined
my homie
>dem high cheek bones
Is the director's other movie any good?
It's very much a parody of old Playboy cartoons and the sexual revolution and it is pretty funny but it's no Love Witch.
>Anna Biller is an American filmmaker who wrote and directed the feature films Viva (2007) and The Love Witch (2016). Biller considers herself a feminist filmmaker and consciously explores feminist themes throughout her work, including exploring the female gaze in cinema.[1][2] She is vocal on both her website and in interviews about gender inequalities in the film industry.[3][4]
yeah i think i'm gonna skip this one. sorry!
she's married to a israeli pick-up artist lol
>Robert Greene (born May 14, 1959) is an American author of books on strategy, power, and seduction.[1][2] He has written seven international bestsellers, including The 48 Laws of Power, The Art of Seduction, The 33 Strategies of War, The 50th Law (with rapper 50 Cent), Mastery, The Laws of Human Nature, and The Daily Laws.[3]
>doesn't look like shit
>hot naked chicks
I guess I'm not a chud anymore because those two things buy an awful lot of good will from me.
>hates idpol
>skips incredible kino because of his own idpol
What did the moronic anon mean by this?
It's funny because if you didn't know the director was feminist you'd think this was an anti-feminist 70s softcore porno flick. It's pretty entertaining.
The movie is much better than her bio makes it sound.
Um excuse me commie liberal troony Stalin but no. We don’t watch movies around here unless the director’s Wikipedia bio passes muster! Idc how kino they are, or how much they offer exactly what I constantly complain about being missing from modern film.
chuds never enjoy anything
That isn't true. I quite enjoyed C.H.U.D.
cucks eat up all the slop
I'm a chud and I enjoyed this film.
It's cringe but also kino. Cringe-kino.
You're not missing anything, it's fricking awful. These horking shill morons are just impressed by fifty year old cameras.
I saw this fat c**t on Joe Bob and she's every bit as egotistical and obnoxious as this bio would leave you to believe.
If only black women in all movies were this attractive.
Who's the black chick? She doesn't show up in the cast list.
I watched it recently and it's pretty good, at least if you like 60s/early 70s movies.
Chad Griff. The lead chick was good but honestly he was the best part of the film, very convincing as a cop in an old movie.
>Henry Cavill going to work.webm
maybe if his hands were a little bigger
I went to sleep and the thread is still up? huh here's 1 more
He fricking killed it in this role, perfectly cast.
true
hell yeah
it starts good, but it gets very repetitive about halfway through, i don't think i made it through to the end
gosh i fricking love this movie, gonna watch it again
Did they use some filter to get that look or was it shot using some old camera?
Danger 5 had the same look to it
Shot on old filmstock. Last of it's kind, I think.
It wasn't, it's the same film stock everything is shot on these days, Kodak Vision3. It's the lighting, colorful production design, and going for a final grade that isn't the usual monochromatic bullshit you see today.
AI will be able to emuulate it post production soon
Saar
Why is it that every zoomer homosexual wants to throw AI onto every problem. You don't need AI for this kind of shit. All you need is a colour gradient map filter.
whu does everyone say "last" instead of "most recent"? is it really impossible that someone will make another?
There is no more, and there never will be.
why?
Cause you ate them all
>sensible chuckle guy
Characters counting off ingredients to a great wienertail with their dying breath is my favorite running trope. Spectacular show.
The coloring is done in post processing, they limit how much color is used
The director explains it here. Its mostly just hard light style with vintage lenses used
https://theasc.com/articles/the-magic-of-hard-lighting-for-the-love-witch
I think they just blasted tungsten or hmi lights on the actors faces, which is what a lot of older lower budget older films did. No bouncing the light or anything you see these days.
Yeah. It's hard light on set, a diffusion filter on the lens + great production design and costumes.
It just has to do with the type of camera and lighting they used.
https://shotonwhat.com/the-love-witch-2016
The camera doesn't matter for the final look when you're shooting 35mm film.
Yup. Film cameras are pretty simple mechanisms that just move the film past the gate. Lenses matter a billion times more than the camera.
Yes, I meant to say lens in fact
why do you unironic homosexuals keep posting about this garbage. it's fricking terrible, there's a reason the crew treated her like the moron she is
ywnbaw
you are unimaginably stupid
You're jealous that your skeleton is forever manly.
>there’s a reason the crew treated her like the moron she is
Explain.
This will surely convince us otherwise, you scum.
They probably hate her for being an actual filmmaker instead of a modern slopproducer.
they hate her because it's like pulling teeth to get fricking anything done in the movie industry. People like Sharon Stone and Ed Norton get canceled for being hard to work with, other stars like Gibson get targeted for removal with methods that didn't exist in the 1970s. It's easier to tear things down than to build them up.
Seriously. You have to respect that Anna Biller did literally everything in The Love Witch except the cinematography. Surprised she didn’t give herself a cameo
Based actual cinema enjoyers of Cinemaphile. Maybe this board hasn’t gone to shit completely.
>Anna Biller did literally everything in The Love Witch except the cinematography.
then what the frick are all the other names in the end credits doing there
>troony poster
go dilate
It’s a great witch flick.
>t. witch lover
Would sexo.
pretty god dang nice
that's a man
(OP)
It is and it's also one of the most redpilled movies you'll ever watch because it shows the glib ruthlessness in the way some attractive women deal with and dispose of men.
Intention in this case is secondary. What matters is what the movie shows and the lessons it offers men, including types such as you
>the most redpilled movies
>thinking this was intentional
lol
It's intentional, it's a case of an old-school feminist winding up at the same understanding of human nature as blackpilled men.
>aside from the technicolor fetish
Witch looked lovely
>Robinson was born on October 19, 1991, in New York City to a Panamanian mother and an English father.
noice.
Cute butt.
Any porn actress who looks like her?
we have A.I. for that now.
AI is fricking terrible atm
maybe in 10 years
I asked because she looks like one from the early 2000s
boomer
You really want to save those crazy Swedes?
Imagine Lynda as a witch. She would be even hotter if that’s possible.
Goddess
Incredibly kino, funny, and meticulously crafted. Director spent years making the costumes and sets iirc. She’s married to the guy who wrote 48 Laws of Power. Also the Love Witch (Samantha Robinson) is insanely hot.
>Poor baby 🙁
I think it’d actually work on me… what about you guys?
Btw the end where the detective rejects her potion is straight kino.
I need to spank that.
>>Poor baby 🙁
>I think it’d actually work on me
It would so fricking hard on me and it made me reflect on myself while watching. A "feminist" made the ultimate movie on female manipulation.
technicolor looks better
Not technicolor. Just lighting and slight vintage grading.
True. 99% of Cinemaphilegays don't know what Technicolor actually is.
why would anyone need to know this?
>need
Obviously you don't *need* to know about it. The thing is that people should shut up about shit they don't know about instead of spreading bullshit.
i'm not in the industry and the guy that makes the movies to upload never mentions it
>and the guy that makes the movies to upload never mentions it
What the frick are you babbling about, ESL poster
what?
those guys that upload the movies on those private trackers never mention if it's technicolor
t. sitting the the east coast of the US and A sipping mocha marshmallow light roast
whoops
on the*
stupid speech to text app
>those guys that upload the movies on those private trackers never mention if it's technicolor
So? Anyone who knows what Technicolor actually is can tell with their own eyes if the film is Technicolor or not.
can you go into more detail why it matters? i'm a bit confused now.
You tired or drunk?
I already made my point:
>people should shut up about shit they don't know about instead of spreading bullshit.
>You tired or drunk?
no, i told you here
i'm sipping a mocha marshmallow blend
now, can you go into detail why your eyes can see it and others can't?
>and others can't
Sure they can if they know what Technicolor is. Plenty of people do.
so you can't explain your flavor of bullshit.
got it, good day sir.
Explain what? You're not asking the right questions. Anyone who knows what real Technicolor looks like can tell what is Technicolor.
why?
Why what?
If you know what something looks like, you can recognize it. It's not rocket science, anon.
Watch enough actual Technicolor films from the 30s and 40s and soon it'll become easy to tell the look from other color films. It's a very distinct look after all.
aren't they technically NOT in color?
The three-strip negatives are black & white, but the final interpositive (and the internegatives from which theatrical prints are made from) is of course in color.
can you do this with BW film and color filters today? im curious to try a homebrew method
You would need a three-strip camera. Not sure exactly what kind of printers and chemicals you'd need in the lab, but no one has done it in decades.
Other methods replaced it. Three-strip is expensive and cumbersome. You need three times the film stock, shitloads of light, and a huge heavy camera. No wonder the process died soon after they figured how to make color films with a single negative.
>but no one has done it in decades.
Yep. The final true three-stip technicolor films came out in the 50s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_three-strip_Technicolor_films
Fun story, Disney had exclusive rights to "animation with three-strip technicolor" for a few years so other studios had to use two-strip, which produced some interesting results
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinecolor
>Other methods replaced it. Three-strip is expensive and cumbersome. You need three times the film stock, shitloads of light, and a huge heavy camera. No wonder the process died soon after they figured how to make color films with a single negative.
thank you
why did they dye plants shut down though?
>you’re not asking the right questions
it's a type of coat
What are some female power kinos like this and Suspiria? Certified hood classics for women
The Witches of Eastwick has a great cast and fits this criteria.
>t. Suspiriaposter
>t. Suspiriaposter
based. I will be watching your rec
It's hard to explain, but I saw in The Love Witch a true feminist alternative. Her world is a utopia that stems from witchcraft being real, or made real. Witchcraft is obviously a metaphor for female power, but it's not that simple. The existence of magic symbolically releases the bonds of a modern scientific worldview -- schizos can be who they claim to be, the weak can be strong, the strong can be superheroes. People in her life aren't defined by their monetary value or their physical value, their agendas and spiritual lives dwarf mere mortality, as a result of living by this magic code. The pillars of the world are vast and inscrutable, tarot and the stars far beyond the reach of man. They hold up the sky and humans can only try to understand, through ancient crone wisdom.
My most favorable interpretation of a Klaus Schwab degrowth future is something like TLW. A vast forested California with mostly small towns, no visible industry and little work of any kind. No important media or knowledge of the outside world, except for what artist or event is coming to town. People live their lives in a delirium of festivals, drugs, magic, and star-ordained fate, watched over by elders and wise women. And everyone gets a beautiful girl at least once, though she might collect your head like a praying mantis.
>Her world is a utopia that stems from witchcraft being real, or made real. Witchcraft is obviously a metaphor for female power,
What does the pervy male witch leader guy represent? The yid creeps who pushed feminism onto the masses?
Truly a redpilled film.
He's a low status male who uses his spiritual power to get what he wants. The fact that he wants sex is valid because he's open about it, just like her not wanting to sleep with him. feminist morality 101
He's the coven leader and rapes all the girls while spouting pathetic feminist ideology he clearly doesn't believe. He raped Elaine at her initiation. Most of the witches just want to LARP as being empowered beings attuned with nature but Elaine is a genuine schizo which is why she becomes a killer.
you weren't asking to prove witchcraft is feminine, right
No, I was serious. A big plot point in the film is that there's a male witch guy who creeps on the members of the coven.
just making sure my first response was correct
notice you didn't say 'incel' because there are no incels in the perfect feminist future. That character gets significantly more pussy than you
he's the "ally" that goes to feminist marches to try and get laid
There is no magic in the love witch
>or made real
they consented and he absolutely believes in getting women to consent to sex. Your mistake is thinking some higher moral standard exists, he's at the limit of his potential being an ugly guy. The fact that Elaine disagrees with him one one or two issues doesn't mean he's a villain or cancelled, pretty funny your main complaint is that he doesn't simp harder.
Oh no, not you again. While our aspiring LaVey isn't the actual villain of the piece (Elaine is), he's a manipulative piece of shit peddling brainrot to dumb broads, and you can deduce this from 30 seconds analysis of his role, and comparing the behavior of coven thots to Trish (they're pure cringe).
If Elaine is the villain and the whole thing is a cautionary tale, why did the crew not understand what they were doing? Why did they think it was morally ambiguous? They're professionals and should understand art.
>30 second analysis of his role
I can hear your labored breathing
They're the crew. Their opinions are not required or asked for.
what about the audience? Do we have anything from the director saying Elaine is the villain?
does anybody think that except you? No wait, I can do one better. Do YOU even think that? Maybe you're just trying to "beat" me. What makes you think she's a villain, the whole movie is about her. Mel Gibson is not the villain in Payback.
That's an autistic concern. Authorial intent is often deliberately ambiguous. The fact that more than one person commonsensically assumes Elaine is the villain is obvious from several comments above and elsewhere-- I wasn't the other guy you were talking to btw.
Elaine is a villain in a mantis way-- her actions have an extreme aspect based on her unconcerned, sociopathic dating/mating strategy.
I only see one person stating outright that she's the villain. Even if her actions are ambiguous, and they are, the act of making a film is straightforward. Can you name two films where the main character is the villain, not an antihero but the main villain? It should be possible even if I'm right.
(me)
Death Proof is my first thought, but the concept of an antihero is key.
>Can you name two films where the main character is the villain, not an antihero but the main villain?
Joker, don't go into the house, Henry: portrait of a serial killer, maniac. You'll notice most of those are horror movies, and the love witch is a horror comedy.
Joker is an antihero
POV slasher flick is a good pick
Henry and jonah hill are antiheros
so that's one.
In what respect is Henry an antihero? He's a low IQ murderer and rapist
michael rooker is hot
serial killers are hot
he's the active agent moving through the lives of less interesting people
When we've finished debating whether a villainous movie protagonist is even possible, we can get back to Elaine. Her so-called villainy is not tempered by any consequences, just the implication that she's wrong. That's what makes it an alternative view, it acknowledges reality. Suspiria isn't as consciously feminist because it's escapism to a world where magic is real. I think Elaine is a better feminist hero because of her flaws, and she's pretty far from being a straightforward villain.
Maniac
Peeping Tom
>why did the crew not understand what they were doing? Why did they think it was morally ambiguous?
Maybe they're just stupid, like a lot of the critics. Biller's intent was to create a female serial killer who kills through clinginess. Her inspiration was female self-help magazines and their garbage advice.
>After Robinson accepted the role, she and Biller watched a series of classic movies featuring women with "great sociopathic performance"
What's the larger motive though? So she's a female serial killer, what does that say about love and gender relations? I guess nothing would be your answer, it's just a crime film to you. She's like Porter from Payback.
I already explained this movie to you once, I'm not bored enough to do it again.
must not have been me. I'll accept your concession on his behalf though
Not really a good movie. It looks fantastic though, wish more directors would use this style.
anyone read anna biller's book "bluebeard's castle"?
in a conventional sense? no
in a shlocky way? kinda yeah
Cute, would be ideal with blue eyes.
this place is overrun by spammers
That’s exactly what a spambot would say. Post DNA.
t. starship troopers, hobbit trilogy, and jigsaw enjoyer
Humiliation ritual.
>that look right before the grapes
Hoochie mama
>feminist slop
:[
>feminist slop, with a hot lead
😮
>here’s that woman that needs magic potions to get men to fall in love with her I was telling you about
>working on Blue Beard movie
>she just turns it into a book instead
FRICK YOU!!!!!!! Hollywood couldn’t give her funding ?
Is there a lot of sexual content? I want to watch this with a friend but I don't want it to be awkward.
Yes. Still watch it though. And give him a bro tug while at it.
She ain't got no penis, sorry gay.