>Lynch is an exponentially better filmmaker than Q. Tarantino. For, unlike Tarantino, D. Lynch knows that an act of violence in an American film has, through repetition and desensitization, lost the ability to refer to anything but itself. This is why violence in Lynch’s films, grotesque and coldly stylized and symbolically heavy as it may be, is qualitatively different from Hollywood’s or even anti-Hollywood’s hip cartoon violence. Lynch’s violence always tries to mean something. Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
>the greatest writer in american history was a lynchchad
based
have a nice day you fricking pseud. oh wait he did, LMFAO
YE YOU TELL HIM uhhh, who are you? Oh that's right, a nobody
>The first time I lay actual eyes on the real David Lynch on the set of his movie, he's peeing on a tree. This is on 8 January in L.A.'s Griffith Park, where some of Lost Highway's exteriors and driving scenes are being shot. He is standing in the bristly underbrush off the dirt road between the base camp's trailers and the set, peeing on a stunted pine. Mr. David Lynch, a prodigious coffee drinker, apparently pees hard and often, and neither he nor the production can afford the time it'd take to run down the base camp's long line of trailers to the trailer where the bathrooms are every time he needs to pee. So my first (and generally representative) sight of Lynch is from the back, and (understandably) from a distance. Lost Highway's cast and crew pretty much ignore Lynch's urinating in public, (though I never did see anybody else relieving themselves on the set again, Lynch really was exponentially busier than everybody else.) and they ignore it in a relaxed rather than a tense or uncomfortable way, sort of the way you'd ignore a child's alfresco peeing.
>Lynch
>meaning something
even Lynch himself says that his stuff is irrational on purpose and not straight up metaphorical
Actual fricking brainlet understanding of that
>It must be a metaphor to mean something
Jesus Christ what a midwit logocentric take.
People like you shouldn't waste time watching movies, just read synopsis.
It's 'synopses', my dear ESL.
He never said that.
?feature=shared
I think of this skit every time Reservoir Dogs is mentioned and it makes me laff
?list=PLtn3QZDDmBnoAO5c-jjVDuycwDJxnBBO7
Every time people mention Wallace I feel the urge to watch his interview on Charlie Rose.
does DFW have anything worthwhile to read? i have been thinking about giving him a shot but if its just self-fellating christhomosexualry then i might give it a pass
Try "Consider the Lobster and Other Essays". It's great.
>DFW didn't understand Tarantino
huh, didn't know that
>Implying there's anything to understand in a tarantino flick
This is some legitimately cringeworthy writing.
No it isn't
It is tho
t.
This is such cringe. Like he’s so far up his own ass lol.
>early life section
Oh carry on then.
What about his early life section?
>the greatest writer in american history was an incel
Insane dunning Kruger effect.
DFW was many things - an overrated writer, a self-conscious twat, a pompous cringelord - but one thing he was not is stupid.
Entertainment is le ba- ACK!
>lynchredditors calling others midwits ITT
LMAO