The whole thing makes sense. It's about one man's regret of how he lived life (like all of us, going forward) and the dream of going backward to correct mistakes.
The whole movie is made up of dream like allegories from one man.
It's actually a better movie than people give credit for
>no its about a russian with cancer who got messages from future people about imploding the world back in time so they can live again or something
That's just the dream the dude is having. None of that is real
>no its real they gave him scematics to build the go back in time machines and the algorithm (bomb?).
Yes I saw the movie. All of that was a dream. The entire movie is a dream of 1 person. Going forward and backward is just something they made up in their dream to process their psychology.
at what part did the dream start my brother i dont think i saw that
9 months ago
Anonymous
>at what part did the dream start my brother i dont think i saw that
The whole movie is 1 dream. Start of the movie=start of the dream
9 months ago
Anonymous
are you saying this is a sequel to Inception? holy shit mind frick
9 months ago
Anonymous
>are you saying this is a sequel to Inception? holy shit mind frick
It's not the same dreamer but yes same concept and similar thoughts they need to process
>you can’t go faster than light therefore Star Wars is bad >a transporter can’t be built therefore Star Trek is bad >nuclear bombs aren’t real therefore Oppenheimer is bad
>if Pattinson would be the lead instead of that charisma devoid idiot we would have amazing movie. Nolan fricked up with the casting.
Pattinson is his son that wouldn't really make sense
>but Pattinson also is his grandfather. How do you explain that.
No the little boy he sees with the woman at school is Pattinson as a child. Or rather Pattinson is how he wishes his son would grow up to be.
>why didn't Pattinson call him dad at any point in the movie?
Because in his dream he connects with this son via the Protagonist (not as a father), and his son "saves" him from underground/death (just as in the "other" timeline Kenneth Branaugh is being dragged dead behind the boat).
It's a mirror image of his life: how it went, how he FANTASIZES it could have gone.
9 months ago
Anonymous
what about the bullets?
9 months ago
Anonymous
>what about the bullets?
It's just all the setup of his dream. In reality he is a physicist, his dreams have evidence of knowledge of physics but they don't make any actual sense. It's just his setup for the dream.
Just like in Inception the dreamer was an architect and incorporated architects into his dream
9 months ago
Anonymous
what happened in his real life that he chose to dream? did he ever wake up?
9 months ago
Anonymous
no he's cycling eternally
9 months ago
Anonymous
>what happened in his real life that he chose to dream? did he ever wake up?
He's an old man dying (of cancer) and regrets the decisions he made along the way. We don't know if he wakes up, the movie is just one long dream.
9 months ago
Anonymous
why did he choose to be a black man in his dream?
9 months ago
Anonymous
>why did he choose to be a black man in his dream?
That's a bit of the "woke" part. It's a decision from Nolan that it would be more "aspirational" if the character was black. Didn't really land in terms of box office but that was the intention.
I mean the guy's name is literally "The Protagonist", you think it was reality? Nope.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Basically it was the dreamer "doing things differently" from his life so he dreamed he was black.
How he courted his wife was different; his career was different; and how he interacted with his son was different. That's what his dream was about.
What doesn't make sense is the time travel machanics. At first they are into a loop, then its stated the timeline can't be changed but they can't get into a loop without a change. Then the whole plot is about they keeping the past (present from the MC perspective) from changing and not letting the future win. Then by the end it does a 180 again and Pattison sacrifices himself.
i would use this to keep going backward to frick your mom
This film was somehow better than Oppenheimer. How?
The whole thing makes sense. It's about one man's regret of how he lived life (like all of us, going forward) and the dream of going backward to correct mistakes.
The whole movie is made up of dream like allegories from one man.
It's actually a better movie than people give credit for
no its about a russian with cancer who got messages from future people about imploding the world back in time so they can live again or something
>no its about a russian with cancer who got messages from future people about imploding the world back in time so they can live again or something
That's just the dream the dude is having. None of that is real
no its real they gave him scematics to build the go back in time machines and the algorithm (bomb?).
>no its real they gave him scematics to build the go back in time machines and the algorithm (bomb?).
Yes I saw the movie. All of that was a dream. The entire movie is a dream of 1 person. Going forward and backward is just something they made up in their dream to process their psychology.
at what part did the dream start my brother i dont think i saw that
>at what part did the dream start my brother i dont think i saw that
The whole movie is 1 dream. Start of the movie=start of the dream
are you saying this is a sequel to Inception? holy shit mind frick
>are you saying this is a sequel to Inception? holy shit mind frick
It's not the same dreamer but yes same concept and similar thoughts they need to process
>stopped making sense at the end
ermm no it didnt.
It didn't make sense from the beginning. You cannot unshoot a bullet
What didn’t make sense?
>you can’t go faster than light therefore Star Wars is bad
>a transporter can’t be built therefore Star Trek is bad
>nuclear bombs aren’t real therefore Oppenheimer is bad
>It didn't make sense from the beginning. You cannot unshoot a bullet
Yeah it's just a dream my dude it's not supposed to be real.
Sure you can, they did it multiple times in the movie
if Pattinson would be the lead instead of that charisma devoid idiot we would have amazing movie. Nolan fricked up with the casting.
>if Pattinson would be the lead instead of that charisma devoid idiot we would have amazing movie. Nolan fricked up with the casting.
Pattinson is his son that wouldn't really make sense
but Pattinson also is his grandfather. How do you explain that.
>but Pattinson also is his grandfather. How do you explain that.
No the little boy he sees with the woman at school is Pattinson as a child. Or rather Pattinson is how he wishes his son would grow up to be.
why didn't Pattinson call him dad at any point in the movie?
>why didn't Pattinson call him dad at any point in the movie?
Because in his dream he connects with this son via the Protagonist (not as a father), and his son "saves" him from underground/death (just as in the "other" timeline Kenneth Branaugh is being dragged dead behind the boat).
It's a mirror image of his life: how it went, how he FANTASIZES it could have gone.
what about the bullets?
>what about the bullets?
It's just all the setup of his dream. In reality he is a physicist, his dreams have evidence of knowledge of physics but they don't make any actual sense. It's just his setup for the dream.
Just like in Inception the dreamer was an architect and incorporated architects into his dream
what happened in his real life that he chose to dream? did he ever wake up?
no he's cycling eternally
>what happened in his real life that he chose to dream? did he ever wake up?
He's an old man dying (of cancer) and regrets the decisions he made along the way. We don't know if he wakes up, the movie is just one long dream.
why did he choose to be a black man in his dream?
>why did he choose to be a black man in his dream?
That's a bit of the "woke" part. It's a decision from Nolan that it would be more "aspirational" if the character was black. Didn't really land in terms of box office but that was the intention.
I mean the guy's name is literally "The Protagonist", you think it was reality? Nope.
Basically it was the dreamer "doing things differently" from his life so he dreamed he was black.
How he courted his wife was different; his career was different; and how he interacted with his son was different. That's what his dream was about.
What doesn't make sense is the time travel machanics. At first they are into a loop, then its stated the timeline can't be changed but they can't get into a loop without a change. Then the whole plot is about they keeping the past (present from the MC perspective) from changing and not letting the future win. Then by the end it does a 180 again and Pattison sacrifices himself.
never watched it because it has a Black person main lmao
>invert yourself
>go back in time
>break the turnstile before the past you can get in
What now homosexuals?