I agree, but only after you've seen 1 for the first time. Nothing will top seeing Jigsaw stand up from the floor for the first time. 2 relies less on the twist ending which makes rewatches better than 1 that doesn't really have much of a leg to stand on after it blows it's load. It's a classic but the traps and story are simply better in 2.
Was it supposed to be a twist that Amanda was working with Jigsaw in Saw 2? At the end it seemed like it was supposed to be a shocker, but they basically explicitly said it in the beginning when she wakes up in the room and freaks out and finds something behind the bricks in the wall.
actually it was rife with twists >Jigsaws kidnapper accomplice is in the house with them >Amanda is actually working with Jigsaw (actually a crazy twist because he forces her into another game nonetheless) >Daniel is alive, in a "safe" place >They trace the signal but its the wrong house so the cop is falling right into Jiggys hands >Also the feed is 2hr behind >Also the bathroom is underneath the house
2 is one of the worst. 3, 4, 6, and 10, are the other good ones.
I don't think you guys remember part 1 that well. I just marathoned them all again. Two was probably the best. 1 is regarded highly mainly because of the twist ending. The acting was pretty poor and the side story with the kidnapping/flashbacks were boring.
Saw was genuinely good. Two characters you got to know and a mystery surrounding their predicament. The next twenty films devolved into tortureslop and killing people off you didn't care about 5 minutes after they were introduced. Sad!
Possibly, depending on what direction they want to go in the future. I wouldn’t mind seeing her go toe to toe with Hoff. Agreed that the ending was anticlimactic dogshit and the weakest in the entire series.
Saw 2 was was kino as well
the rest were decent as far a mediocre horror sequels go. Haven't seen X yet but looking forward to it might see in theaters
nah, the first movie wasn't good either. >"I want to test your resolve to live" >"to do this I will lock you in a room and you have to escape" >"the key to escape is in a bathtub and will fall down the drain, rendering escape impossible before you even fully regain consciousness" >"if you did manage to grab the key then you would just immediately escape with no lesson learned" >"I am a very clever mastermind"
the franchise was always garbage.
Saw III solved this by showing that amanda was the one making that game and made it impossible on purpose. They couldn't have escaped even if they got the key.
>um no the mastermind was never the mastermind
first off all you can't retroactively improve a film. secondly, that just makes Jigsaw more moronic for letting that b***h do whatever she wanted. he's the one who tells Adam where the key is so he knew how the trap was planned. either he approved it or he is fricking senile.
>Horror movies are about the journey
And the journey is literally pointless. Adam had no chance at 'winning'. Tapp is an entirely worthless plotline as well. Aside from Gordon cutting his foot off to escape virtually nothing mattered, and we don't even get to learn if he lived or not until the seventh fricking film. The ending of the first film implies that Jigsaw killed him, meaning his sacrifice was pointless too.
And it's not all pointless in some deep and meaningful way, it's pointless because the game was poorly designed, Jigsaw is a moron, Tapp is incompetent and dies like a b***h, and the most interesting parts of the film are flashbacks.
The "journey" boils down to: >guy says he wants to test people's resolve to live >actually just ends up murdering them due to bad rules + random factors
Which is a shit story.
There are good bits in the movie, you can probably find good bits in each of them, but it should have never been more than a short film.
Based Saw 6 enjoyer >main game revolves around the insurance guy making choices that mirror the choices he makes in his profession, only for him to make the opposite choices that his formula would tell him to make (saving the middle-aged sick woman instead of the healthy young man) >his final test sees his life being put in the hands of someone else, just like his clients' lives were in his hands >the twist was simple but effective >all that, topped off with some Hoffman kino on the side
VI had the stupidest twist, where it turned out Amanda was the one responsible for killing Jigsaw's baby and Hoffman blackmailed her into killing the girl.
I watched 10 last night. I saw the new ones when they came out. And the originals several years ago. If memory serves:
1 > 3 > 6 > 10 > 4 > 2 > 5 > 7 > 8 > 9
Saw 2 is better than 1. There, I said it.
I agree, but only after you've seen 1 for the first time. Nothing will top seeing Jigsaw stand up from the floor for the first time. 2 relies less on the twist ending which makes rewatches better than 1 that doesn't really have much of a leg to stand on after it blows it's load. It's a classic but the traps and story are simply better in 2.
Was it supposed to be a twist that Amanda was working with Jigsaw in Saw 2? At the end it seemed like it was supposed to be a shocker, but they basically explicitly said it in the beginning when she wakes up in the room and freaks out and finds something behind the bricks in the wall.
It was supposed to be A twist but THE twist was the whole "the game already took place days ago and the cops were watching a recording of it" thing
actually it was rife with twists
>Jigsaws kidnapper accomplice is in the house with them
>Amanda is actually working with Jigsaw (actually a crazy twist because he forces her into another game nonetheless)
>Daniel is alive, in a "safe" place
>They trace the signal but its the wrong house so the cop is falling right into Jiggys hands
>Also the feed is 2hr behind
>Also the bathroom is underneath the house
I never saw any of them.
Lmao no it's not. It's pseudo psychological bull shit that looks like a rejected numetal music video. Frick off.
I don't think you guys remember part 1 that well. I just marathoned them all again. Two was probably the best. 1 is regarded highly mainly because of the twist ending. The acting was pretty poor and the side story with the kidnapping/flashbacks were boring.
3 and 4 was not bad either.
2 is one of the worst. 3, 4, 6, and 10, are the other good ones.
>3 and 4 over 2
Never heard this opinion before but it's cool 4 has fans.
1 through 6 are good.
Might agree tbh. 2 was a great sequel.
Saw II felt like The Cube
fpbp
I sometimes wonder how the series would go if someone like Xavier survived the game and became a jigsaw apprentice.Fricking hysterical
Saw? Mote like... LEG lmao
jej
every saw movie is good
Milked
Saw was genuinely good. Two characters you got to know and a mystery surrounding their predicament. The next twenty films devolved into tortureslop and killing people off you didn't care about 5 minutes after they were introduced. Sad!
sometimes sloppa is GOOD
Saw X is the best film of the series.
I don't understand the ending to saw X
Did he let that lady live ?
That sucked so much
Possibly, depending on what direction they want to go in the future. I wouldn’t mind seeing her go toe to toe with Hoff. Agreed that the ending was anticlimactic dogshit and the weakest in the entire series.
Saw 2 was was kino as well
the rest were decent as far a mediocre horror sequels go. Haven't seen X yet but looking forward to it might see in theaters
>I want to play a game
>Remember those racist tweets you made 10 years ago? Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of consequences.
nah, the first movie wasn't good either.
>"I want to test your resolve to live"
>"to do this I will lock you in a room and you have to escape"
>"the key to escape is in a bathtub and will fall down the drain, rendering escape impossible before you even fully regain consciousness"
>"if you did manage to grab the key then you would just immediately escape with no lesson learned"
>"I am a very clever mastermind"
the franchise was always garbage.
Saw III solved this by showing that amanda was the one making that game and made it impossible on purpose. They couldn't have escaped even if they got the key.
>um no the mastermind was never the mastermind
first off all you can't retroactively improve a film. secondly, that just makes Jigsaw more moronic for letting that b***h do whatever she wanted. he's the one who tells Adam where the key is so he knew how the trap was planned. either he approved it or he is fricking senile.
What's wrong with that plotline? Horror movies are about the journey not the destination.
>Horror movies are about the journey
And the journey is literally pointless. Adam had no chance at 'winning'. Tapp is an entirely worthless plotline as well. Aside from Gordon cutting his foot off to escape virtually nothing mattered, and we don't even get to learn if he lived or not until the seventh fricking film. The ending of the first film implies that Jigsaw killed him, meaning his sacrifice was pointless too.
And it's not all pointless in some deep and meaningful way, it's pointless because the game was poorly designed, Jigsaw is a moron, Tapp is incompetent and dies like a b***h, and the most interesting parts of the film are flashbacks.
The "journey" boils down to:
>guy says he wants to test people's resolve to live
>actually just ends up murdering them due to bad rules + random factors
Which is a shit story.
There are good bits in the movie, you can probably find good bits in each of them, but it should have never been more than a short film.
What if he had tried to kill Jigsaw in the first movie?
He had a zapper in each of their leg chains. Which, come to think of it, ineffective if they cut off their leg and made a lunge for the gun.
Damn, I kneel. John Kramer thought of it all. Bravo, what a mastermind.
But Saw 6 but is the second best one after the first
Based Saw 6 enjoyer
>main game revolves around the insurance guy making choices that mirror the choices he makes in his profession, only for him to make the opposite choices that his formula would tell him to make (saving the middle-aged sick woman instead of the healthy young man)
>his final test sees his life being put in the hands of someone else, just like his clients' lives were in his hands
>the twist was simple but effective
>all that, topped off with some Hoffman kino on the side
VI had the stupidest twist, where it turned out Amanda was the one responsible for killing Jigsaw's baby and Hoffman blackmailed her into killing the girl.
jigsaw an old weak homosexual I would frick him up if he tried to drug me and put me in a trap or whatever
I watched 10 last night. I saw the new ones when they came out. And the originals several years ago. If memory serves:
1 > 3 > 6 > 10 > 4 > 2 > 5 > 7 > 8 > 9
Saw 1,2,3 was good others are bad. First one was the best and it did not need even one sequel.
Strahm was the best character, it made me mad when he died.
how did they have a dismembered leg as a poster
Needs a reboot so it can finally execute its own story concepts properly
They made her so comically evil I thought they were gonna make her a Nazi as well.I hope she's gonna be in the sequel
I call that epic bad luck