"In the fields of media studies and feminist film theory, the male gaze is conceptually related to the behaviors of voyeurism (looking as sexual pleasure), scopophilia (pleasure from looking), and narcissism (pleasure from contemplating one's self). Parting from the Freudian concept of male castration anxiety, Mulvey said that because the woman has no penis, her female presence provokes sexual insecurity in the unconscious of the male, wherein women are passive recipients of male objectification. The on-screen presence of a woman's body is notable, because "her lack of penis, [implies] a threat of castration and hence unpleasure", which the male gaze subverts through the over-sexualization of femininity. As the passive subjects and objects of the male gaze, the hypersexualization of women thwarts the man's castration anxiety with the sexual practises of voyeurism-sadism and fetishization of the female body."
Who believes this delusional tripe? The only ones getting anxious when they see beautiful women are ugly feminist critics.
Women are dishonest about their values and motives. It's really pretty simple
cool webm
the older you get, the more its hard to not suspect the absolutely massive gaslighting of men by women.
deception is the only tool women have to wrest power from men, who are superior to them in nearly every way, especially physically.
Millions are waking up.
This right here.
So 15.2 million women are allowed to run to shelves and buy 50shades of grey about getting S and M beaten and fricked = healthy.
But a dude stares at some thot's ass in lulu lemon pants at the gym and he's a degenerate in fear of his dick getting chopped off.
Frick this ride, I want off.
And I'll still stare at her ass, in a healthy way of course
Consider if you will why every functioning society was formed on denying women rights and just beating them if they get out of hand.
To the point that, whether you have spiritual belief or not, you can admit that all surviving societies wrote their scriptures or mythologies portraying women as inherently evil and needing to be kept in check.
All the others simply died out, or maybe you might find one or two ooga booga tribes that were matriarchal and got by on the fact black women are just highly aggressive.
it's very simple i just like booba and vagoo
>me like booba
>this requires dozens of "PhDs" to study and deconstruct
>>me like booba
>>this requires dozens of "PhDs" to study and deconstruct
This is one thing I figured out by my final year in film school. "Leftist Academics" just analyze things that don't need to be analyzed. It's a way to seem smart without actually putting in the work. Want to learn nuclear physics and help make effecient energy for the world? Too hard, that would require learning things and building on those things. If you go the route of "deconstructing" you can start wherever you want, work backwards, and allways be right, because your results don't matter.
>this requires dozens of "PhDs" to study and deconstruct
All this work when it comes down to the fact that we were sucking on boob since day 1
I'll take my PhD now
its almost like we are some kind of mama animals..... mammals!
>I'll take my PhD now
Not until you pass your oral defense.
Meanwhile porn is empowering
If this line of thought is to be believed porn makes us scared of getting castrated, therefore it gives women power to make men scared subconsciously by their very existence. So yeah, that vibes. If that's what they want to tell themselves to keep showing me breasts and ass then by all means, think it. The more aggressive and sloppy the content the more scared I am of my dick getting chopped off. Please oh please don't scare me with a chick taking 10 guys at once, unbroken by their thrusts despite their best efforts.
Alice Eve should be glad that picture is so famous since she got fat like five seconds after it was taken
Pretty sure she's on record saying she thinks it's pretty cool and awesome.
Anyone who's ever actually known a real woman, not a blue-haired schizo on anti-depressants, but a normal woman, knows that women like being seen as attractive. Believing otherwise is like thinking that depictions of powerful, attractive, strong men only exist in media to pander to female consumers.
Women like being sexually attractive, and thus they like identifying with women who are sexually attractive.
But male gays aren't into chicks
getting fricked in the ass as a baby can do bad things to you
How old were you, anon?
a baby, 19
god put all the effort into designing this one women
SIMP ALERT
this isnt what simping means
>putting pussy on this high of a pedestal
>"I-I-I'm not simping, h-honest!!!1!"
based moron
dude, really, I know it's summer but before you want to hang out with us you better learn the meaning of words
>moron randomly blaming summergays
my fricking sides
keep digging that hole, simphomosexual
we'll be laughing at you, not with you
you are a real gay aren't you? imagine saying a women is hot as frick is the same as giving money to onlyfans, dude get a life
>"n-n-no, I'm not simping like th-these other gays!! pl-please stop calling me o-out!!"
>zoomer mad at being called out
Massive damage control underway. You have to go back.
>"no (You)" is the best thing the simp could come up with
Zoomers don't know the meanings of words, they just repeat it because they saw it online or on social media somewhere.
this is what I suspected, I have seen simp misused in youtube and tiktok comments too
Do you have a brain aneurysm with those people, too, autist?
>samegayging to yourself now to damage control
OH NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
God is a waman
that explains A LOT
Sarah is pretty fine
In fact I would go so far as to say that I would like to frick her
not a fan of the face, but cant deny the body of work
>not a fan of the face, but cant deny the body of work
That's why God invented doggystyle
are we pretending her face isnt gorgeous? show pictures of every girl you ever fricked and let's compare
shits subjective brother. i am not saying she is ugly.
no. beauty is objective. desire is subjective. you can like ugly girls, or dislike pretty girls, but that does not make them more or less objectively ugly or pretty.
Maybe if you bend the definition of beauty to only include “evolutionarily desirable traits” but even then, as a total metric it’s extremely subjective. What is more important? Good hips or not having manly shoulders? Big boobs or perky ones? How do they all add up and which traits are weighted more? That’s entirely up to the system of judgement
Who decides what is beautiful?
He’s not comparing her to girls he’s fricked. He’s comparing her to other objects of lust he’s seen on the internet… ironically… bring us back to the OP
post 10 prettier faces right now
no, that would be pointless, since I just said taste is subjective.
I absolutely could find 10 hotter images online. That’s the whole point, no one is comparing her to women we’ve met, we’re all comparing her to images we’ve whacked off to online, and in that competition she can’t compare.
>and in that competition she can’t compare
I disagree, show proof
Shut the frick up you moronic pajeet simp homosexual
>PROOF 2 ME THERE IS HOTTER SIR!
Go get your head run over by a truck.
just one girl, a name
Easy, Taylor Lashae, but you'll just disagree cause you're a simp. I could find and name hundreds if not thousands more.
That's a man...
God damn you must have absolutely pathetic bone structure if you consider this "manly". Genetic trash.
>Genetic trash
But I'm not the one into trannies like you.
I'm not into trannies you fricking idiot, again, if this reads as "manly" to you, you are certifiable genetic trash with shit bone structure. Do your grandma a favor and have a nice day.
very pretty but not as hot
You said find 10 prettier faces, the one I posted has a prettier face and I can find more. The chick your talking about is obviously attractive but she's extremely generic.
Girl in your webm has narrow hips, that’s what kills it for me.
>inb4 she’s still super hot
Again, we’re not comparing her to real women, we’re all judging based on the millions of videos and pictures we’ve seen online. Things like pose, outfit, hairstyle, etc will all factor in
you posted some 16 year old girl, that's cheating
nice peach fuzz btw, very cute
She’s 19
>nice peach fuzz
Ikr
>that’s cheating
It’s making my point though. These people in the images are only women in an abstract way, they’re just objects to be desired or scrolled past. This realization hit me when I started fricking the girl who I had a massive crush on all through high school, and she was hot but just absolutely miserable to be around. Not even b***hy or anything but just annoying as frick. Killed any and all attraction I had for her at the beginning. OPs quote seems like a lot of psychobabble but there is some truth to the “male gaze” in modern media. There’s probably even a female version on E! or something but I can’t speak to that since I’m not a woman
OK, but how does any of that corroborate the OP? Do you truly think the girl you had a massive crush on was actually just making you scared of losing your genitals?
Well I specifically said that seemed mostly like psychobabble so, no. My point is just that there is some truth that “the male gaze” especially in media, is several factors removed from normal male sexuality.
Eh, guess I missed where you said that. Hard to disagree with that statement on a base literal level, though I'm not seeing why it's a bad thing, or any different to anyone else looking at objects of desire to whatever their preferences are. As long as you're not trying to push that the statements made in OP are somehow not moronic bullshit based on your statement then I guess you didn't say anything I'm going to spend any more thought trying to disagree with.
Well I’d say “the male gaze” the way it’s done in modern media is becoming harmful, esp to young men, you may disagree with that. There’s nothing wrong with watching transformers for example, but letting Megan Fox type characters form your primary understanding of women will only hurt young men. Irl women are annoying as frick to deal with in several very specific ways, and learning how to have a meaningful relationship with one anyway has to be learned via experience. If your primary interactions with women your age is through porn and objectifying media, it’ll lead to disaster.
You are gay and a homosexual.
>but letting Megan Fox type characters form your primary understanding of women will only hurt young men
Who are these young men who only know of women through a used up hag like Megan Fox? Meeting real women will be disenchanting enough. Hence why we need better ones in fiction.
>who are these young men
Younger millennials and zoomers. Porn consumption is way up, sex and relationships are way way down. And it doesn’t even seem like young men and women understand eachother at all. Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t know anything about women as a young man either, but I was learning by interacting with girls my age, not forming my opinions on sex and dating purely online. I think people my age might have been the last generation to have that forced interaction at all, the smartphone came out shortly after I graduated high school.
>show pictures of every girl you ever fricked and let's compare
not that anon
too easy to reverse lookup even if you alter the picture considerably
I have slept with two girls with prettier faces though
don't care if you believe me or not
facially, this chick is maybe a high 7
who wouldnt? literally perfect body and face, she looks classy but whorish, literal perfection
God, I love women. Anybody who wants to take away my enjoyment of gazing at these beautiful and sexy creatures is mine enemy and shall perish by the sword.
Well said. Women are wonderful, honestly. In the best of cases they're beautiful and clever. I don't want a world without them, and I abhor anyone telling me that this mentality is harmful.
We don't make art to objectify them, we make it to honor them.
Make sure to honour them at least once every day or two, anons.
It's good for your prostate.
>Pornbrain
I'm sorry your first thoughts were had in the glow of a tablet screen
This is literally a thread about men admiring beautiful women in scanty clothing. Your disapproval seems... misplaced.
Also, it was just a joke you homosexual.
>Cannot post sincerely and gets catty when called out
Zoom zoom
Dude, you're the one getting pissy over a joke and the mere mention of masturbation.
enough with the cryptic comments
Why is her ass a rectangle
it has its origins in people trying (at least partially) to express their ideas precisely, which always needs a little jargon. Stupid people saw this and tried to imitate the jargon aspect, just without the motivation of being precise or clear or anything of the sort. They just like the way it sounds and a feeling of exclusivity
women are liars and hypocrits and love latching onto pilpul arguements to deflect from this. The more words used to cover up their short comings, the better they feel about it. A man's eyes are drawn towards lines and curves, it's an adaption for making them better hunters and fighters. Biologists and anthropoligists have known this for decades, and artists have known this for hundreds of years. A man's attention will be drawn to the 'penisless' breasts just as easily as it will be drawn to an apple or an orange. Men focus on veganas because of the lines created by their body, not because they cant stop staring at pussies. The reason many men like 'fat asses' and not 'flat asses' is again, shape theory. Just look at a guy when he stars at a woman, his eyes follow the contures of her body, he is looking at the literal shapes and following them to their logical points of conclusion. These concepts of perspective are well known and if these liberal arts homosexuals took a regular art class, they wouldnt say such moronic shit.
its israeli pilpul. as our society becomes more semetic, the goyim copy the mannerism of their israeli masters. Pilpul was a rhetoric technique developed by rabbis to basically explain away scamming god by interntionally misinterpreting the torah for their own secular benefit. And any field of study dominated by israelites is inevitably full of pilpul. Pilpul is why israelites are sterotyped as being clever or wise, it's a way to front load a conversation with a bunch of superflorous words in such a manner that your target is stunned. Nobody wants to admit they are stupid or cant follow along, and since there is so much to process in a pilpul infodump, most people nod their heads and agree with the pilpul and this kind of false rhedoric goes unchallenged in society.
Does a film have the male or female gaze if it's made by a homosexual?
Pic related is the one who coined the phrase
Yep. When reading theory, people (college students especially) really need to get in the habit of checking what the actual people that came up with it and developed it look like, their height, and their early life.
99 percent of the time you read moronic shit like this its coming from an ugly freak, a manlet, a israelite, or some combination trying to take out their neuroticism and bitterness on society and get their revenge by fooling people into adopting a pathological ideology.
People have these grotesque little weirdos programming their minds and they don't even know it
Is this supposed to be a bad thing?
It makes chuds feel icky on the inside so yes
If the feminine presence supposedly provokes anxiety, how does focusing on exposed, very feminine women reduce that anxiety?
Mulvey's point is that a woman reduces male anxiety only if she's sexualized (or otherwise made diminutive) because if she's made on par with men then this would scare men.
Which is nonsense because sexuality in itself is very anxiety inducing. Every time I had to ask a girl out I was scared out of my mind.
Too many big words for you? Sheesh.
>As the [not powerful] subjects and [not full human] of the male gaze, the hypersexualization of women [replaces] the man's castration anxiety with the sexual practises of [disempower with ogling] and [reduction of full entity to isolated component] of the [not male] body."
The assumption that there is such a thing as "castration anxiety" is moronic, especially that it would be triggered by women, and if the lack of penis is what causes it then I don't understand how the woman having bigger breasts or whatever would resolve it
>Who believes this delusional tripe?
People who sit around in college learning how to analyse media thinking it's giving them the keys to unlock some secret code when in reality all it does is prepare them to teach high school English classes and to write trite reviews.
>>Who believes this delusional tripe?
>People who sit around in college learning how to analyse media thinking it's giving them the keys to unlock some secret code when in reality all it does is prepare them to teach high school English classes and to write trite reviews.
Film school grad from the 2000s here, and yes this is 100% it.
I vividly remember the people who couldn't do the actual work, couldn't edit, couldn't work a camera, couldn't do VFX, Couldn't act, couldn't do makeup, props, lighting, etc. etc. all went into the "analysis" side of things or sometimes writing.
>>Who believes this delusional tripe?
Its actually the women who run the HR departments of companies. Plus a lot of other middle and upper management these days.
Sigmund Fraud
His middle name was literally Schlomo
>I'm attracted to women because I'm fearful of my dick getting cut off
Dumbest shit I've ever read.
I don't think I've ever felt insecure because women DON'T have penises. How exactly did the author come to this conclusion? Did she survey a randomized group of men?
She's a woman so she can't stop thinking about penis.
She surveyed this guy
source?
Curious as well, that looks like it’s not a porno, but the woman is a porno slag (Ana foxxx) so now I’m confused
Tangerine
do people really go down on prostittues?
I really don’t get the joke here, why would he ever assume the hooker has a penis? Or is the joke just “haha penis sex haha”?
shes so ugly he assumed it was a man (troon)
the joke is that you assume it would be the oposite and a guy would get mad for invting a street hooker to his car and finding out "she" is packing
He’s just an old school Tool fan is all.
Maynard James Keenan and his consequences has been a disaster for the human race.
It's from the movie Tangerine. The guy is a troony chaser and yells at this girl for walking around the shemale corner he usually picks them up from.
literally me
Straightest Cinemaphile user.
sorry meant for
literally me like literally literally
>and narcissism (pleasure from contemplating one's self)
Wait so I only enjoy staring at women's boobs because I like thinking about myself? How the frick does that make any sense?
Which is it - is stripping and doing porn 'Empowering' or is it 'Male Gaze and Problematic'?
Its empowering if the one doing it is a Karen or ugly you chud
Women wanting to do it is empowering. Men enjoying it is problematic. I wish I was joking.
Does that mean the sudden renewed push to ban porn is by extension a way to subjugate women or men? If you don't support the porn ban does that mean you do support feminism?
Depends. Some radfeminists want porn banned. Others are sex positive and think it's fine. Some think it's fine but that "sex work" is still rape even if it's consensual. Women's politcal movements are like women, confused, incoherent, and unstable.
It's whatever feminists feel like it is at any given time.
You’re conflating liberal feminism with radical feminism, which are two ideologies so dramatically opposed to each other than can hardly be called two branches of the same ideology
Liberal feminism = Porn/stripping/prostitution/makeup is empowering
Radical feminism = Porn/stripping/prostitution/makeup is misogynistic
So lesbian gaze doesnt exist now? If sexualizing is bad then why do all those ugly and fat people want us to sexualize them?
>muh male gaiz
This is what women actually are
>because "her lack of penis, [implies] a threat of castration and hence unpleasure", which the male gaze subverts through the over-sexualization of femininity.
wut lmfao
no, we want to frick them, moron
women don't understand men at all, do they
I think this is not a case of women misunderstanding, it is very specific women with a mental illness trying to make speeches and appear smart
>women don't understand men at all, do they
they dont understand even themselves
learning the phrase "butt fangs" from this place has done no good to my mental health
Lmao leave it to a leftist to write an entire fricking thesis about the novel concept that men are attracted to women.
Feminists are bitter roasties who feel the need to pathologize natural male behaviour. Taking them seriously was one of our biggest mistakes.
I had sex with a trans escort once. Her name is cariek (seriously look her up - complete bombshell). I was nervous about it at first because even though it's still considered straight, her penis made me skeptical over how much I'd enjoy it, but after she began riding me with her feminine wiener plopping up and down onto my chest, I came damn near instantly. She was a sweet heart about it.
kys homosexual
>these are the people you share this board with
nuke this fricking site
>her
>she
>seriously look her up
nearly vomited my oatmeal, gaygigucci
You guys who didn't realise all that trap shit was jokes a decade ago and got memed on are sad but hilarious. Imagine missing a joke and accidentally becoming a homosexual lmao
>make entertainment for people to watch
>complain men are looking
The male gaze is a moronic criticism, given that the female gaze is pandered to JUST as much. It's just talked about as much - but every male lead, every shirtless scene, romance scene, etc is also pandering to their taste. Women just have a severe case of wanted noone else to have fun.
>It's just not talked about as much.
Fixed
women like attractiveness too
don't know. sounds like walled roasties.
if I didnt know better, I would say this was an AI creation
Sauce?
Random video of a vietnamese in Melbourne. Not porn sadly.
What does shemale pusy feel like, anons?
It was never chicks with dicks. It's always been men with breasts.
>MEN LIKE A THING!?!?!? AAAGGGHHHH HELP ME I'M GOING CRAZY!!!
I'm not reading all that.
She's currently hooked up with the son of James Reyne, the singer for Australian Crawl
I bet they have great sex
What a terrible piece.
The designer should hang himself.
Pretty sure Honey Birdette's designers are actually lesbians
Got a photo that shows if this prostitute actually has hips or if she's just yet another discarded fridge?
>scopophilia (pleasure from looking)
Wtf does that even mean? You get pleasure from being able to see?
(pleasure from looking)
>Wtf does that even mean?
it's the act of scoping out the babes
I looked it up. It's more of pleasure from objectifying a women lol
What a moronic term, women objectify themselves anyway.
Women are an object. So are men. So are all things. It's a completely meaningless term that sociology professors made up to pretend like they are a useful field of study.
>objectification
>ermahgerd they're looking at me like I'm an... object! to be looked at?! I'm no OBJECT imma PERSON. They're depersoning me with their gaze I just know it!! My personhood is threatened! RAAAAAPE!
Do they really believe this or is it one of their ultimate Shit Tests?
The women who complain the most about this are feminists who men don't want to look at anyway. It's just seething and undercutting the competition through complaining and playing the victim.
I’d imagine the ones who say this shit a lot are people who are unaware of how others perceive them. They want the attention and/or money from dressing provocatively but also want people to see them as an individual. Modern life and the depersonalization the internet stokes make this impossible though, esp on a wide scale.
You might be able to have both within a single relationship, but not on a wide scale, and not without effort.
yes and blindgays will never recover
Leonardo da Vinci
Picasso
Rembrandt
Raffaello
Michaelangelo
Monet
all masters of the male gaze. And not just painters, but al the world's best writers and scientists were also male gazers. Deal with it, c**t.
Every time I see this image I get triggered to fap
>Mulvey said that because the woman has no penis, her female presence provokes sexual insecurity in the unconscious of the male, wherein women are passive recipients of male objectification. The on-screen presence of a woman's body is notable, because "her lack of penis, [implies] a threat of castration and hence unpleasure"
all leftist and israeli thought is moronic, psychology in general is moronic
Feminist media analysis has to be one of the biggest rackets in academia. Really try to imagine paying someone 100K a year to "teach" people this "information"
Even worse, imagine PAYING tens of thousands of dollars to BE taught this
It's funny because Mulvey's male gaze bs is basically all you learn in Film Studies classes in the US
Does this imply that all sexual attraction is, at its core, over-compensation for subconscious fear? What does this say about those that are not heterosexual? Does that mean that all gay men secretly actually hate and fear men? All lesbians actually hate and fear women? Has this not been studied because no one has coined a (sexist) term for the "gaze" of anyone outside of straight men? If so, why not? Do they love men, and so devote their lives to understanding them?
>men like boobs
>women show boobs
glad there's an entire academic jurisdiction dedicated to this complex social phenomenon.
>her lack of penis, [implies] a threat of castration and hence unpleasure
Literally what on earth did she mean by this? What kind of mental illness is on display here?
They need to come up with anything, however obtuse, to imply fear or weakness in men, because their entire philosophy is built around physical inadequacies and penis envy.
>Mulvey said that because the woman has no penis, her female presence provokes sexual insecurity in the unconscious of the male
It's hilarious how women just copy ideas from men and say "no you".
there are lots of women pictures here. what's this thread about?
You don't need all that Freudian crap to acknowledge that men tend to instinctively objectify attractive women when making art.
feminism is just hatred of men intellectualized and nothing more
>In the fields of media studies and feminist film theory
lol didn't read rest
If I were rich enough, I would pay Vina Sky and Pokimane to have sex with me. Once, maybe twice. Does that make me a bad person?? No. Why should it?
Yeah that's the feminazi expansion pack on the objective camera movement which your pic is a bad example of.
It refers to the movement of the camera, tracking the female's movements on screen and the shot composition designed to direct the eyes to her movement.
Movies being appealing is bad actually
>t. Haim Pedowitz
“Male Gaze” was literally coined by a lesbian pissed off about getting hit on by men
I’m not kidding
I still don’t get why that scene was even in the movie, iirc she was changing uniforms or something. Why didn’t she just go to a bathroom or something, to get changed? It doesn’t make sense bros, I like booba as much as the next guy, but that scene in her underwear was wholly unnecessary, tbh.
Maybe she just wanted to show off? She worked hard for the scene, and she was gorgeous. I thank her for it.
Male gaze = ugly women jealous of attractive women, blame men
That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. It's just a dishonest attempt by ugly women to get attractive women into burkas under the guise of progressivism.
Freud was a neurotic israelite mess.
>something something Freud.
Discarded in its entirety.
>Freudian concept
Everything wrong with psychology and the humanities in a nutshell.
Freud was a hack whose entire thesis hinges on the idea that some moron with a clipboard and a chaise longue is in a better position to understand your mind than you are. Once that French homosexual Lacan (noted simp for Freud) wrote an entire literature that extended this even further into philosophy and art, it was curtains for Western society. If you're not familiar: this is the origination of poststructuralism and the "you're actually inherently racist/sexist/etc and you just don't know it" rationalization that talentless Black folk and fat, unfrickable dykes have been leaning on for decades to get employed and published in academia.
Protip: Freud was never correct. Tall buildings are not dicks designed to frick the sky, they're an architecturally efficient use of otherwise wasted vertical space. Cigars are also not dicks, because it makes no sense to waste effort rolling a square or triangular cigar, nor could you even smoke a spherical one. Nobody is trying to kill their father, beyond the generalization of most dads being shitty, nor is anyone trying to frick their mother, beyond the generalization of mothers having a pair of breasts and a vegana like every other woman. Nobody wants to be dismembered, so it's not 'castration anxiety' just because you're talking about the dick and balls specifically. Women do not have penis envy, they're just hypocrites who find them gross and weird until they're 10 inches long and attached to a tall man with a fat wallet.
Notice that all of this is obvious to the uninitiated. Only after the intervention of 'academics' would you suspect otherwise. This cadre of socially moronic pseudointellectual grifters has everyone duped into assuming they're an authority, purely by virtue of being organized. Without that context, one quickly realizes that any given Freudianism would look just as at home scribbled on a padded cell wall in human shit.
Seems mostly correct.
Freud never claimed anything about skyscrapers or cigars and there are actually square and triangular cigars, called box-pressed and pyramides. And box pressed are actually more efficientn to store and usually cheaper. Also, penis envy is Jung.
Freud and all his cronies were pseudoscientific, delusional quacks...and that includes Jung
A naked woman is a beauty to behold
A naked man is an inconvenience
That’s not sexist it’s the truth
pleb
I will never apologize for finding attractive women desirable and wanting to look at them.
>The on-screen presence of a woman's body is notable, because "her lack of penis, [implies] a threat of castration and hence unpleasure"
Ugh what a load of crap. How do they let these unscientific liars continue to have a platform? I am so mad I'm shaking. Women can have penises. Did they get their PhD at Chud State?
what a tweeeeest
"male gaze" is just sex shaming men's interests in women
Don't look you monster!
STOP GAZING, YOU ARE LITERALLY RAPING ME WITH YOUR EYES YOU FRICKING c**t
No, I just like breasts
Why do mammals (literally breast-bearing animals) like breasts? I don't understand.
They correlate to fertility
Obviously. It's just funny that these pseuds can't figure out tit obsession when "mammal" literally means tit creature.
Do other mammals fetishize breasts like humans do though? I genuinely don’t know but I’ve never seen it. Human sexuality is much more societally influenced than other mammals though, that much is assume is true
Some might. We are much higher functioning and that is a factor.
>You think this simple fact about human nature is like this? Erm actually you're wrong it's actually like this because you are scared to get your balls chopped off.
Psychology is a pseudoscience.
who would fricking take the time to write this bullshit?
Whenever people talk about the "male gaze" concept they always leave out the part about castration anxiety, even though it's central to the concept, I guess that part would just reveal how crazy and made up it is
Black folk