I mean I don't know- I personally thought it was fine. I think we can all agree it's getting a LOT of it's inspiration from the first Star Wars movie, as well as a number of pretty recognizable influences, but I still thought it was decently entertaining. But MAN did people not like this movie, holy shit!
 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
66% means there were more people who likes it than ones who didn't.
Not really. Rotten tomatoes and IMdb weight the scores so negative scores count for less.
Yeah lots of pajeets with rotten tomatoes accounts
>2/3 of people liked the movie
>therefore nobody liked the movie
Learn basic math.
Cool so it's 5% less liked than Morbius
>tries to use Rotten Tomatoes scores to discredit movie
>but also tries to discredit his own argument by saying Rotten Tomatoes scores don't count because sometimes bad movies get ironically memed scores
You can't use two conflicting arguments to try to make your point, pick one.
>because sometimes bad movies get ironically memed scores
Rebel Moon's score is inflated. Go look at the 5 star reviews. Most of them have only reviewed that film and nothing else. Go check the user scores on other sites. They're in the toilet
>You can't use two conflicting arguments to try to make your point, pick one.
You can't hold someone to standards that don't have any. Being on the 'right side of history' is all they care about. No tactic too low, no threshold they will not cross.
If you receive a proposal from a studio to make a film with hundreds of millions of dollars invested, they give you total control to make the movie and you still manage to make 1/3 of the customers hate the product, you have failed as a director.
How so? Seems like he got to make the movie he wanted, without having to spend a penny of his own money, and instead of trying to pander to the lowest common denominator he just made exactly what he wanted.
Snyder won.
he already said it's not his real vision
I don't care if he spend 30 minutes more introducing the characters or if Boutella fricks somebody in that village, the ending is horrible, i rather have Boutella dancing like Chris Prat in GotG than that shit.
well yeah I didn't see it I'm just saying that he's a homosexual
Why do you keep making rebel moon threads?
How would a turret gunner have a lever that could bring down the entire ship?
>the gunner is commanded to open fire by pointing a stick at him from the ground
>no wireless communication
The movie has so many well-written scenes
>movie starts
>how do we convey that the protagonist is a child war incapable to truly love and be loved, that the very idea of love and family was beaten out of her, to teach her that love is weakness and it's unclear if that will ever change?
>"But understand that I'm child of war, to truly love and be loved, I... I don't know if I'm capable of either. The very idea of love, of family, was beaten out of me. I was taught that love is weakness. And I don't know how that will ever change."
>with sad music
>War Child starts playing
KINO
Jesus Christ. That was just incredible. I literally had to pause the movie and stand up and walk around for a minute to get my head together when that showed up
what is a chubby feminist from fury road doing in space?
That scene towards the end where all the heroes they spent the second act running around recruiting are being held captive by the guy that betrays them, and Captain Exposition comes in and just goes around in a circle reintroducing them to the audience and just literally reading each of their length character descriptions and backstories
>inspiration from the first Star Wars movie
normalgays are so moronic
>even the director himself said his inspiration was indeed A New Hope
>"how dare those normalgays say that the movie takes from Star Wars?!"
You are a mongoloid.
>He got a chance to create his own Star Wars.
>0 space combat
Really?
Everything I've read about this movie makes it sound like Snyder literally decided to make his own Star Wars with hookers and blackjack. I have absolutely no interest in it whatsoever.
>did people not like this movie
Yes, the movie is shit, Boutella is old as frick to play this shit and she shows barely no skin, Strong fems that can't do no wrong are usually borring too, she even had her moron babbling male as sidekick with barely no sexual tension, it is what we have been criticizing in Mahvel / Star Wars years, it is not a movie for boys and it looks written by cool wine aunts, I suppose that's what Snyder has become.
>coomer criticism
Kek. Barely human.
Artistically is a piece of shit too, John Carter, Jupiter Ascending or Valerian alike, and the script the plot and the pacing are horrible.
Don't care, coomer. I only take educated human opinions serious.
This was written by an AI right? I have never seen a more sloppy amalgamation of tired and overused tropes in my life. There is no way a human put this together and thought "this is fine".
How did the empire get so big by being such dickheads?
>Snyder did shit, again
>Actually there is a "Snyder cut" for it
>True version gonna be cool, believe me!
He Can't Keep Getting Away with This
Brother, have you ever seen a Zack Snyder movie before? This is kind of his bread and butter. And sometimes it hits with people like it did for most audiences with The 300 and Watchmen, but man oh man when he misses bro just WIFFS it, like with shit like Sucker Punch, or Legend of the Guardians: the Owls of Ga'Hoole. People forget sometimes he's made some movies that were pretty much universally panned by absolutely everyone, but the thing is he puts just as much effort into the flops as he does with his hits. Like it's fine if you don't like him, but the man has a style and he's clearly never phoning it in. Like even with his shitty movies, it's very evident that while he was making it, he was giving it 110% so do with that what you will
B-but I like Watchmen and 300, it is shit because he can't write but that's it
>sure he made a dookie but i'm sure he put a lot of effort into it
doesn't change anything.
I get the sentiment that a bad movie is still a bad movie no matter hard you tried, but I would disagree that it means absolutely nothing. I think there's a pretty big difference between just phoning it in and making some bullshit for a paycheck and not even trying because you couldn't care less about the end result, and a writer/director who has a vision, and gives it their all and takes big swings and sometimes just really fricking misses. I think those are two vastly different things and should be treated and viewed much differently
I think
probably hit the nail on the head (if it actually wasn't an AI job). This movie feels like the result of a bunch of young boys interested in fantasy and scifi but without any real idea of how to craft an interesting story coming together and just brainstorming a bunch of "cool stuff" and then just stitching it into a catch all movie.
Well if him putting "effort" in just means slapping together all of the most unoriginal fantasy and space opera themes and ideas into a disjointed mess I guess he succeeded.
It's a Frankenstein script of things Snyder found cool.
That actually makes some sense. Obviously doesn't make it good, quite the opposite, but at least its a reasonable explanation how this script came to be.
Yes, the set and character design was flagrant Midjourney slop. Probably all the plot and storboarding as well. I'm surprised at how many people don't recognize this.
>All warriors are close combat specialists with sad pasts.
Yeah, I loved this joke from The Suicide Squad too.
>You have a cool colosseum.
>No gladiator matches
Hahahahahahahahahaha
But did you see how that ... girl? bathed that black guy there? what a cuck lmao
Watched it. Was OK, but basically the exact same plot as A Bug's Life / Seven Samurai / Battle Beyond the Stars. Also "inspired" heavily by 40k. Literally called their human empire the Imperium.
It was AI slop.
I wanted to like it but if I'm being honest it sucked, Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets was shit but even it was more enjoyable than Rebel Moon. I'm pretty easy to please when it comes to space movies but Snyder fricked it all up
Valerian at least has creative ideas. This mess just reuses every trope imaginable but on the most basic level possible. Every scene feels like you have seen it before somewhere else, just done better and with less slo-mo. Against my better judgement I tend to eat cool looking scifi slop up but this is so fricking basic and unimaginative it just hurts to watch.
Honestly I felt kinda unwhelmed when I saw it in the cinema a week ago. It's ok. But tbh I've seen enough spaceships and battles and yeah it's like seven samurai and starwars. But I've seen these Fricking movies before. He does his best work on comic book adaptations. Jl, 300, Watchmen. When it's all laid out for him hes golden. When he creates his own shit, not so much. Her I believe he was just trying appease netflix and give them what they wanted a run of the mill commercial success
>Sexual assault in movie
SARS ... I will now watch your kino
I had a bad feeling about this after the opening monologue because it sounded so fricking generic. But oh boy, this was way worse than what I expected, even after that. Is there a single original idea in this? Hell is there any unoriginal idea done well?
Wait, this wasn't a part of the Star Wars expanded universe?
I just watched a couple reviews of it on youtube and apparently it literally was a rejected Star Wars script. Like the initial plan was literally to make this into it's own stand alone trilogy in the Star Wars universe, but Disney backed out because it was too violent/sexual. So Snyder hit the find/replace button on the script and changed the word "Empire" to "Impirum" and sold it to Netflix instead.
So no, it's not your imagination, this very literally is just a reworked rejected Star Wars script
Makes sense that Disney would reject it only because of the violent/sexual overtones and not on the grounds of it being utter garbage. It would have fit right into their portfolio.
>robot bro admits that only a blonde white woman will bring peace to the universe with her inherent kindness
>rejects technofascism and embraces nature
yeah, i'm thinking kino
The whole movie is about rejecting the brutalism of colonialism and a return to a monocultural and agricultural mode of life where everyone knows each other and they lived by the land.
The theme the movie is going for, and this will become more apparent in the director's cut, is that expansionism and multiculturalism is a mixed bag because it dilutes the culture and identity of people, creating resentment and strife. The old king was slain by people from off-world that he tried to assimilate and befriend, Kora finds peace in a monocultural village where life is simple and its people have a strong connection to its land, several of the characters are people that lost their home and culture and are aimless.
>fine
the time, energy, and finances to go to a movie theatre cannot be spent on “fine”
Sneeder, like nolan has NEVER been good. Not ever.