By his art, the artist has the mindset and taste of a typical troony kek >any women >tied up, raped, used up, typically in a systemic and violent way. Slavery. Ugly Bastards.
At this point feels like personal anger toward women in general with really sad scenes. >gay fembody or futa porn >soft. loving. intimate. pleasurable.
Great art, but absolutely not my cup of tea. Can call him based but he is just a gay man with mommy issues.
>be straight man >don't hate women, but am not a big fan of their character and behavior >create fictional women superior to their real world counterparts because it's what fiction is for
Difference in mindsets
No, women love hot men who abuse them because they love to romanticize the >I can fix him
trope. The women into ugly bastards are the same kind who are an autistic obsession away from furries/dogfrickers, which isn't all women but is probably in the similar vein of abusive-spouse-apologists
If we're not talking about fujos, no, women typically love porn where a woman is fricked by a man who just can't resist them and hold himself back because he just wants her that bad. Or shipping, or husbando loving, or cool aesthetics like monster (faceless but expressive) men.
Easy use, dehumanization and all the other fricked up flavors of it is pretty out there for most normy female-porn enjoyers, but the ones that do tend to be the loudest.
>Gays are prostitutes
To the shock of no one
Total homosexual death
Bugchasers are simply a symptom of a diseased community.
Big sad realization.
Marvel watercolor style going on it's sort of like John buscema
You can literally feel the artist's thirst coming off these pages
I can feel it too
>draw female
>call them male
Shotakino.
Just found out about this artist, holy frick man I'm fricking coming
That is not a male face
fine... I'll ask.
Source?
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/12751315
Are you fricking blind?
I don’t read. Never have, never will.
Do you play yugioh by any chance?
By his art, the artist has the mindset and taste of a typical troony kek
>any women
>tied up, raped, used up, typically in a systemic and violent way. Slavery. Ugly Bastards.
At this point feels like personal anger toward women in general with really sad scenes.
>gay fembody or futa porn
>soft. loving. intimate. pleasurable.
Great art, but absolutely not my cup of tea. Can call him based but he is just a gay man with mommy issues.
>be straight man
>don't hate women, but am not a big fan of their character and behavior
>create fictional women superior to their real world counterparts because it's what fiction is for
Difference in mindsets
Yeah it's really very funny how reading a bit more into these fetishes reveal the mindset of the artists.
But that's what women love?
No, women love hot men who abuse them because they love to romanticize the
>I can fix him
trope. The women into ugly bastards are the same kind who are an autistic obsession away from furries/dogfrickers, which isn't all women but is probably in the similar vein of abusive-spouse-apologists
If we're not talking about fujos, no, women typically love porn where a woman is fricked by a man who just can't resist them and hold himself back because he just wants her that bad. Or shipping, or husbando loving, or cool aesthetics like monster (faceless but expressive) men.
Easy use, dehumanization and all the other fricked up flavors of it is pretty out there for most normy female-porn enjoyers, but the ones that do tend to be the loudest.
i love this dude's illustrations
wish he posted more of these studies
I admire the commitment to making sure the junk a woman getting railed over looks as good as possible.
Is that not supposed to be a girl, what with the chest binding and snatched waist
Because even girly boys don't look like that
Almost all twink stories become more entertaining when it's a Mulan story instead