MarvelBros...
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
MarvelBros...
MarvelBros...
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
baka incels bombing another movie again
The only people who care about this film are coomers though
the audience isn't allowed to review it yet. that's the shill critics bombing it
>critic score
>reviewbomb
moron
Turns out that critics can't handle strong female protagonists. General audiences can and love these types of characters. This is why film series like Indiana Jones and Captain Marvel have done well at the box office for decades.
>Captain Marvel
Disney bought the tickets tough.
it's reviewers you diaperstink. they're voting it down because Boobs McKenzie is in it and they're protecting the feelings of their bestie Karen fugloid m'ladies by making it seem like everyone hates awesome boobs, when in fact they love them.
Lmao imagine sitting through two hours of this slop
Not a Marvel movie.
Yes it is.
It's a Sony movie.
It’s still a Marvel movie. What you meant to say is that it isn’t an MCU movie. Use your words, anon.
When people say Marvel, they mean MCU. You know this.
You said something incorrect and I corrected you.
No, you're trying to be misleading and pedantic.
No I’m not. I’m right and you’re wrong.
People do not call these Sony films "Marvel movies", they call MCU films Marvel movies.
It's a movie based on characters from marvel comics, how is it not a marvel movie?
Holy frick,you are such a useless nerd.
Most Normies can’t tell the difference
What does it matter, the marvels was a MCU movie and it's the worst financial flop of all time, lost twice as much money as the flash. This movie will probably do better
That's the equivalent of blaming nintendo when gamefreak is too incompetent to make a good game
cope
Yeah....but
my penis in both of their veganas = me happy
>leaving out the best one
I want Moner to star in a remake of La Belle Noiseuse.
I want moner to star in a live action berserk with a 10 hour cut of the eclipse
Holy SHIT just LOOK at those breasts
Kys coomers.
have penis in vegana intercourse incel
frick off homo
reee normal evolutionary psychology at play reee I hate nature reee, ok troony
You are not heterosexual.
>yeah...but
but nothing, maybe if they had been wearing comic appropriate attire the movie would have went somewhere
Makes me want to shoot my web
Sydney should remake And God Created Woman
MOGGED
>hire hot chicks
>full spandex
>ok go whip out your breasts for PR
movie theaters are just too expensive
I'm saving my movie going money to watch DUNC2 with pic related
but I will watch the frick outta this movie once it comes out on streaming
MAMMA MIA!!
HHHNNNNGGGGG BOOBA SEXO
They look walled up. They'd be more attractive if they wore paper bags on their head tbh. It'd add to the "Mystery Meat" fetish.
I'd let them both fart and shit in my mouth.
Sydney is like a literal 10/10 in my book. There's nothing I don't like in her, including the sleepy eyes.
This is such a cool thing she is also a good actor
Her waist is lacking and she takes it for granted without muscle definition
I guess
imagine dakota with sydney's breasts
Isn't this a kids movie?! HOLY BAZOOOOOOOMGAS!!! WEEOOOWEEEOOOWEEOOOO!! HEEEEHAWWWWW! BOOOOIIOOOIIOOOIINNGGG!
The rest of the cast didn't do coomer ads 🙁
Cinemaphile is watching it TWICE
>women too sexy for movie
Great review
it's out!
still gonna see it, even twice
sure you will, sanjeep
>The Marvels shat the bed
>you know what we should really invest in?
>Lidl The Marvels
And I thought Hollywood was all about taking super safe bets, but they keep betting on trying to girlboss into success when it keeps failing.
I bet this was already planned and paid for years ago.
different production company.
weird how when those movies make profit they are "Sony Movies" but when they flop they suddently become "Marvel Movies".
>The Marvels
>all ugly ass women
>Madame Web
>3 hot women and one token Black
They don't know true kino
Wow Disney is paying off the reviewers again? I’ll wait for the audience score thank you
>critics gas up shitty superhero garbage
>they hate this one
Maybe it's actually good then.
The queen of Cinemaphile needs our help
Sexpot
MINX
I'd help throw her off that balcony
She already jumped ship to DC
certified kino
Good, no one else will be in theater making it that much easier to jack off to.
VDay singles policy BTFO
She knows
bobs and vagene
>Jarvis, enhance at full pusay levels
That can't be enough fabric to contain the smell. It really was webbin time.
I can almost see her labia.
And I know she knows, I know she knows
if they were French actresses, they would not wear any bodysuits under those mesh dresses......
I'll fix 'em.
Empowered vs Powerful
M she U
This isn't an MCU film.
its capeshit and there for mcu.
Are you moronic?
are you attempting to categorize capeshit?
It's either MCU or it isn't. It isn't.
>its either capeshit or its capeshit
Well said,sir.
>all girls
I did not even watch the trailer. I'm only interested in movies with young and handsome main characters. I enjoyed Blue Beetle and Shazam because Xolo Madriduena and Asher Angel are hot.
Who could've predicted that all these moronic films about Spider-Man's supporting cast (with Spider-Man removed) would be terrible?
>Snoy Marvel movie is bad
Who would've thought?
Amy Pascal had a job, first bring Black Cat in a Spider movie with Sydney Sweeney playing her and then bring Spider-Woman and female villains all of course faithful to the comics but Amy Pascal is the worst capeshit producer she understands nothing and the trailer shows it, Sony should put a straight man fan of comics to continue running this franchise, Pascal had 20 years and failed
Pascal have to be very incompetent to make a movie with these actresses and have it turn out badly
Well when you cover them up and make sure no skin aside from the face is showing, then yea it does horrible
>Well when you cover them up and make sure no skin aside from the face is showing, then yea it does horrible
Most female super-heroes are half-naked in the comics. The chick's in this movie showed up half-naked to the premiere. Yet modern comic book adaptations from live-action movies, to video games, as well as animation, wants to cover the women up. Something ain't adding up here.
I was told that women shouldn't be exposed like that. Which is it?
>that pic
we trully live in the golden age of prostitutes.
too bad if you want a wife and kids but whatever.
>movie removes any sense of sexuality from female character because of patriarchy and the male gaze
>actress in real life wears as little as possible and accentuates he natural gifts to make sure everyone notices her
Why do they do this?
she's not even in this movie
At least she kept her mouth closed for the pic this time thank god
So?
>Xochitl Gomez sneaking in
is that her goal?Go to enough premieres so people think you actually were in those movies?
It's a free party man, it's what I'd be doing
I think she just likes dressing up and meeting actors.
I would like to do that, how do I get in?
Make up a fake pass, dress like you belong there
Be in a notable comic book movie but also have a free schedule.
She's literally Cinemaphile if Cinemaphile was a cute Mexican girl made for breeding.
Maisie looks chunky as frick
That's Dakota Johnson anon, and she looks skinny.
Do you think Sony asked them to dress up like this to draw attention away from the reviews?
No, that is how actresses often dress on red carpets.
You can see the wide back native genetics in Isabela
Damn, would rim each and every one of them, but im still not watching your capeslop
>Dress is supposed to be a web
now i get it, it still looks dumb as hell
you know things are desperate then they instruct every actress to dress like a harlot for the premiere.
>you know things are desperate then they instruct every actress to dress like a harlot for the premiere.
Enjoy your life of misplaced rage good sir, I'm sure pretending that women are unworthy prostitutes will bring you great comfort in your inceldom.
>they instruct
literally no ass lmaoooooooo
i would worship that
Worship what? There is nothing there
i’ve seen her whole ass in webms and it’s nice
No ass
No breasts
Moner's aren't big but they are nice
Moner is cute
Especially when they're pushed up as far as they can possibly go.
hot
NONONONO SEX DOESN'T SELL!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THE ONLY THING EVER TALKED ABOUT THIS MOVIE ASIDE FROM SHITTING ON THE WRITING IS HOW HOT SYDNEY IS!!! BRING IN MORE UGLY BlackS TO STAR IN THESE MOVIES NOW
What's with the mouseshill attempting to separate this failure from the MCU? Lmao, the MCU has always been shit too, dweeb. :^)
It's not going to do worse than The Marvels. Screenshot this post.
It literally can't. Even if it made 0 dollars and zero cents it wouldn't lose as much as The Marvels.
What the frick is Sony's plan with this weird ass universe?
They thought their other IPs could exist in their own cinematic universe without Spider-Man. The israelites got greedy, nothing new.
so does she shoot webs out and swing from buildings?
>See Dakota Johnson's face
>Mommyyyyy, she looks so hot for her age
>Check age
>She's just 2 years older than me
It's over
Do you not understand how time works or something?
>Rahim is a native French speaker but that’s no excuse for the awfulness of his largely ADR’d line readings, which sound as if they’ve been filtered through an AI voice program.
>Madame Web then draws further attention to this nouveau-spaghetti Western aesthetic device by hiding Rahim’s mouth in darkness in almost every shot in which he’s not wearing his costume.
Wtf
They don't care. By the time the movie is out, it already made more than enough money to pay itself.
I will watch this movie. They better have sexy costumes.
They do but they only wear them for like 5 minutes, and only on flashforwards
Worse than The Marvels. Our girl Sydney doesn't deserve this.
They just hate Sydneys Sweeneys and Moner.
>Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless are American writers, best known for writing films together, like Dracula Untold, The Last Witch Hunter, Gods of Egypt and Morbius
You're not allowed to ask about their early lives, and they swear otherwise, but I think we all know why they get work. It's all so tiresome.
>lead is white nepo babby
The critics and fans are allowed to hate this because the lead is white. Disney made this shitheap on purpose as a tax writeoff.
This isn't a Disney movie.
Same thing, mouseshill.
>Disney made this movie
>Disney did not make the film
The MCU is shit.
This isn't an MCU film
Doesn't change what I stated, shillbro
ok so do you accept that it's a non-sequitur and completely irrelevant to this movie and this thread though
If it makes you mad (it clearly does, since you got your panties in a bunch defending your precious mousebucks), that's enough for me to keep saying it.
please explain the concept of tax write offs and how they pertain to this film
Studios are taxed on their profits, so if a they make 2 movies and spend 200 million on them, one nets 400 million and another nets them negative 50, they only have to pay taxes on 350 million. Thing is everyone at the studio was already paid, and most productions purposely overspend and pay themselves though shell companies set up specifically for the film. It's why none of the MIB movies ever made profit on paper.
or the harry potter movies
Remember the story of Forest Gump author taking net points and they told him they couldn't because the movie was in red. Same happened with the producers who brought the film rights for Batman to WB. It seems like a prerequisite to being a studio producer is being a colossal scumbag.
>and most productions purposely overspend and pay themselves though shell companies set up specifically for the film
This, movies don't cost as much as they tell you they just pocket the money
>whose money thoughie?
Pension funds normally subsidized by the taxpayer AND shady money that needs unshading
1. Movie spends money on subcontractors owned by the ~~*elite*~~ and their families at movie studios
2. The movie generates a loss, offsetting profits in other areas so that taxes don't need to be paid
>its morbin time part 2
Place your bets boys, how much money will this movie lose?
Marvel enthusiasm is mostly gone. Maybe you can gin up some hype for Spiderman because he is just one of those beloved characters but everything else is dying.
The MCU is shit. Are you mad?
>Are you mad?
>If it makes you mad
Are you like 7?
The MCU is shit.
At the moment, and properly will end up becoming shitter so wimmen and take it over and shit all over it some more.
He appears to believe posting the incredibly daring and unheard of opinion of "I don't like....Marvel!!!" on Cinemaphile of all places is epik trolling so probably.
Ya boilin?
>Higher RT than Morbius
Venomsisters... We're back
>critics hate it
So it'll get a Fresh rating by the audience.
Audience scores seem to be a majority bots ever since TLJ released. Studios want that high score for these flops to stand a leg. Hell. Morbius got a 71% and The Marvels got a 82% somehow.
Listen, we all know this is just angry bitter right wing internet femcels protesting casting decisions they don't like by review bombing a perfectly enjoyable movie.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT'S NOT A MARVEL FILM!!!!!!! IT DOESN'T COUNT IT DOESN'T COUNT IT DOESN'T COUNT IT DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!!!!!
>YOU BETTER BE WATCHING MY FRICKING SPIDER CAPESHIT, CHUD
What's the goonerscore?
Pretty high:
i knew this was going to have bad reviews simply because the cast is quite literally gorgeous.
You can't have a discussion on this board anymore without 3rd world coomers from Brazil and France and other places commenting how they find a woman attractive and want to frick them. Same empty comments over and over in every thread.
I'm sorry you are gay or a woman.
I am not prude at all it's just tiresome that this makes up the majority of the comments now.
it always been like that here, most men like women and comment on it
>always
No, zoomers have slowly changed a lot about this site. It never wast his bad.
Cinemaphile is a porno website. Get used to it, newbie.
1st of all its not as in posting porn on boards like this one gets you banned
2nd I commented about you 3rd world morons who just talk about how you want to frick certain actresses and find them hot. Such mundane stupid observations that add nothing posted over and over again.
Post porn right now and you'll get that ass banned, chudcel.
"oh no gorgeous people hired to be in movies because they are gorgeous are getting attention because they are gorgeous"
Actors are hired because they a peak specimens. This isn't going to go unnoticed, especially not by an almost entirely teenage male website.
Anon we don't need 50 third worlders making the same comment about how they are attractive. Why is it so important for you to say that?
Is there a fricking post limit on Cinemaphile or something? Are you being charged every time someone posts?
You can tell you are from a turd world country because you have no concept of quality. "No I must say for the 100th time today that I found some woman an anon posted attractive I have to let other strangers know this"
How do you where they're from? Seems way too specific
Brazilians and the French ruin every community they are part of because they can only think with their dick like blacks but it's not just limited to them.
They should have cast less sexual women for their film if they wanted me to judge it some other way.
They should have cast hot big dick trannies, 1 billy guaranteed
Sony is so out of touch
People who say "billy" are the biggest gays on the planet.
I havent been to the theater since rogue one and I fell asleep.
remember that movies are a $28billion industry. Compared to videogames $185billion.
if you really want to set yourself for tax foolery video games is where it's at.
Who is this movie even for? Madame Web fans?
Women? Coomers?
Who the frick asked for a Madame Web movie starring admittedly hot girls who are dressed for a tour of Saudi Arabia? Who is even the villain? Is it the patriarchy again? The male gaze?
Coomers
Then why are the women in the movie all covered up? Do coomers really go and see movies just for pretty faces when they can sit at home and watch free porn 24/7 starring pretty girls? Seems like a very poor demographic to choose considering the other options they have on offer.
Its completey moronic
>we want the guy audience lets put in some hot girls
>but we don't to appear to objectify and alienate women so lets cover them up
>now we've checked all boxes, this will surely be a hit
It was for the “girlboss feminists” demo but the tracking was so bad that the marketing department veered hard towards the “sex offenders who jack off in movie theaters” demo during the last two weeks before release.
>they didn't produce Fleshlight popcorn vessels
just not good enough
Why are these people just incapable of making a movie that appeals to the general public? It seems like they're making movies exclusively for their own circle of friends who don't actually watch these kinds of movies to begin with.
How the frick are they constantly being greenlit?
Moner boner?
Yes moner has a boner
can we talk about the symbolism of the movie? Is there.. any... symbology?
Moner is the reason to watch
meh
17%
16%
who the frick is madam web
Some Spider-man secondary character from the 90's
Granny character who originated from the Spider-Man cartoon Cinemaphile loves so much. She watches over LE MULTIVERSE but only for Spider-Man.
Character madam web is supposed to be old, like eldery, there are probably actresses that could actually act and would be cool to see a wise woman giving advice to Peter
Instead we get this corpo diversity trash
They hate women and the stories they could tell, this is a humiliation ritual
>id rather have old busted b***hes then fresh hot babes
im a milf guy and I still feel compelled to call you gay
Ultimate version was young iirc. Either way Madame Web has never not been shit. Spider-Man works best when he doesn't have these moronic destiny shennanigans going on
critics must be so happy that they don't have to pretend to like capeslop anymore
All of the Sony Marvel films have been lambasted critically.
They're gonna goon for Deadpool. Don't get too excited.
Lmao, imagine falling for the ironic watch israelite. What a dumb b***h.
Why is there a random tweet accepted on RT?
This isn't even coherent enough to be a user review
I don't get it. Why can't Sony just make good films?
That's hard.
>sony made another shitty spider man quasi spinoff
Why exactly does this dorky literal who b***h get to have her movie opinions listened to
meant for this fricking hell
if they had just made sydney sweeney running around with her breasts out in skin tight leather, this movie would do 10 million. have the costume half torn apart during fights, etc.
>Sydney Sweeney in Empowered
Sydney isn't empowered, she's powerful.
Sorry forgot my pic
>this movie would do 10 million
That would be a massive bomb.
>Our movie will gross...ten million dollars!
It's over for marvelturds and capeshitdom in general.
Needed more Moner
STOP RUINING FEMALE FILM YOU FRICKING INCELS
If critics hate it that means it's good
You have no opinions
Don't care. Still gonna coom twice.
they should have had lots of sex scenes with hand holding breeding. That would of saved it.
Dakota Johnson doesn't like the film.
Another sex haver put in her place. Good work kings.
Don't watch Black person and women shows.
Don't give a single millisecond of time or a penny to Black person and women shows.
Delete Sony.
If Sony keeps making bad movies thwt use characters from the Spider-man comics, wouldn't that be a good reason for Marvel to reacquire the IP?
Easier said than done.
Why the frick do they keep making female super heroes. Women will never support it financially
these pictures are the best it'll produce coom wise imo
the movie will be feminist garbage with them wearing nothing even close too these PR "dresses"