Massive TVs

Does anyone have a very large screen? What have you found to be the downsides? I'm throwing up between a tv and short throw projector.

Post set up if you got it.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not very large, only 65". But it would be nice to have a 75" or 85". Bigger is better.
    >projector
    Projectors are total garbage. Even the expensive ones are trash. They wash out the colors, are never properly bright enough and look even shittier with the lights on or sun coming through a window.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      85" isn't very big
      Projectors over 10k mark are nice. The Sony laser projectors for instance look as good as OLEDs.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        85" is massive.
        >The Sony laser projectors for instance look as good as OLEDs
        Hahahahahaha. No.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Massive from 6 feet away. Anything further it ceases being massive. If you're 10 or 20 feet it isn't that big. 120" + should be the minumum for a good kino station.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >sitting 20' from your TV
            Lmfao. Shut up poorhomosexual.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Your TV room is the size of a bedroom. I think you're projecting.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                no it's not a projector

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It is not a projector. You are.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                No I'm a TV

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're a radio.

                It is not a projector. You are.

                You're a blender.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >project at 92"
      Only downside is that I want to go bigger, but lack the space.

      I prefer watching movies on my projector over my OLED. It's not just the size, but there's also no judder or motion blur on the projector.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >judder
        The shudder when you're jacking off?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >absolute garbage movie used to demonstrate absolute garbage opinion on viewing screens

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >there's also no judder or motion blur on the projector.
        I thought a typical protector would be worse for both of these than a modern OLED.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Still trying to understand how motion blur and judder are better on a projector.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Still trying to understand how motion blur and judder are better on a projector.

          OLED uses "sample and hold" (which is what causes the blur) for it's display and the fast pixel response (literally nanoseconds) doesn't play nicely with low frame rate content (ie; movies), a DLP projector does neither of those things so it's more suited to smooth motion at "lower" frame rates.

          It really is very noticeable. A projected film is just more visually appealing.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            But OLED is still better at these things than any other type of affordable sample and hold display right?
            Also what about sampling multiple times on the same frame (24fps at 120hz) and black frame insertion?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >he likes projectors
        >he is watching star wars sequels
        it checks out, you are moronic.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can tell you have only used those Chinese $99 projectors lol. I have a $599 Epson and it looks great

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I work for Epson and I prefer a television. The only projectors that can compete in quality are high-end laser projectors that cost over 10K each. You get much more bang for your buck with a television.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I wager that in a few years we'll see some theaters switching away from projection entirely and do some insane shit like take sixteen 100 inch OLED panels and making an absolutely absurd multipanel array.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            that's moronic. Really, really moronic. You would be stupid to believe this.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Saw Tenet on release at a theatre with a Samsung Onyx screen(46ft wide microLED) and while it looked amazing and like a giant OLED screen, I imagine it's a lot more expensive than just using fancy Dolby/IMAX type laser projectors which are not too far off from how that Samsung screen looked. Maybe when that tech is more refined and cheaper to produce, more theatres will adopt?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I work for Epson
          You're lying and have likely never seen a projector in your life

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            also this
            they all use the $100 ones from Amazon in a day-light bright room on a dirty wall and then come here to b***h like the homosexuals they are

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        this
        120" and it looks fricking incredible
        you homosexuals miss everything dope because of your ugly faces and autism

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    screens give off crazy amount of heat and look forward to electricity bill rising a fair amount (if any of you manchildren pay bills)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      TV's hardly use electricity compared to other appliances we use.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They ain't making plasma or flourescent tube backlight displays anymore

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        fluorescent uses pretty much the same as led backlight energy wise.
        oled in theory should be more efficient but nobody wants them because they are shit
        dont you remember 30 years ago your dad going around shouting because you left a light on, that was when incandescent lamps were 100 watt bulbs. tv shows were only on for 3-4 hours a day and used maybe 80 watts?
        now we have 8 watt bulbs and 200 watt tvs.
        if you double the size of your tv it quadruples the power draw remember.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          still my tv uses 300 watts peak mostly lower for a 65 inch. That works out to 10.2p an hour. If I watched it 10 hours a day at peak power its 30 quid a month and in winter who cares. My pc is like 500watts playing balders gate

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's virtually nothing compared to what your fricking tesla burns

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >hating electric vehicles
        go back

        [...]

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >screens give off crazy amount of heat
      No they don't poorgay moron.
      > forward to electricity bill rising a fair amount
      Moderd TVs use hardly any power.
      Youre really worthless and stupid. Talking about manchildren, you're a complete failure.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pseuds should be beaten in public and pissed on, you're a moron.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      why are americans so stupid?

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Massive ass

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm throwing up between a tv and short throw projector.
    A toilet is probably a more sensible place to throw up.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This guy speaks from experience.
      Based and vomitknowing pilled.

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    These videos make me laugh because the thumbnail and video is bait that its clearly just to show off her ass.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is a LG 55B2 considered large for a bedroom?

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have that exact tv from op's photo. It's provides an excellent picture. Just make sure your room is big enough to support a proper viewing distance. Also you'll need to buy proper wood furniture for it, as it's quite heavy and some particle board ikea shit isn't going to support the weight. It's about 75" wide, so you'll need a stand around 84" wide.

    Pros
    >great picture
    >big asf and impresses people that see it
    >32% more sreen space than 75"
    >65% more screen space than 65"
    >neo supports better dark color than a standard led due to the increased led density

    Cons
    >99.9% of you are too poor to buy one
    >you need a friend to help you set it up due to the size
    >too big to fit in most children's bedrooms

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why wouldn't you hang it on the wall

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Even if you hang it, you still want to get furniture to put under it.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          No. Furniture is for old people. Everything in my house has a plug.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I bet you have one for your butthole too you fricking gay.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Actually, yes. And for my dick.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >No. Furniture is for old people. Everything in my house has a plug
            t. Virgin

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >make sure your room is big enough to support a proper viewing distance
      But why though?
      I have a 75" at the foot of my bed.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I have a 75" at the foot of my bed.
        I guess that's fine since no one else will ever be in that bed with you.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      do americans really put 85 inch TVs in their children's bedrooms?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can't speak for anyone else, but tv in the bedroom was considered kinda trashy when I was growing up and tv in a kid's room is just gross.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think 30 year old anon was implying that his bedroom in his mom's house is too small for a big TV.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can't speak for anyone else, but tv in the bedroom was considered kinda trashy when I was growing up and tv in a kid's room is just gross.

        I put a 65" OLED in my 2 year olds bedroom. It's the American way you foreign trash

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What does the Neo stand for?

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Downsides
    Some of the downloaded media I have is pic related (mid 2000s) and looks like arse on a big TV and I cbf finding better quality rips for shit I don't really care alot about but don't hate enough to delete.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      *from pic related

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      imagine the smell in there

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >looks like arse on a big TV
      this pretty much
      don't even have blue ray,
      no need to bother with a fricking TV-wall

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Samsung has a great upscale engine in my tv. I watch a lot of standard def stuff on it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Any video game that's older than five years old look like shit on any TV bigger than 60"

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      kek you can always tell who's house it is by the chairs the dudes are sitting on. There's always the one dude with a real computer chair and the rest are using random bullshit lawn furniture

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        wow sherlock holmes level critical thinking there you obtuse midwit wtfffff

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          shut the frick up moron

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >bro you ever notice the most obvious thing ever and its like only I notice because smart
            nah

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    55" is perfect
    Let me guess, you "need" more?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cope. 55" is small enough to use as a monitor on a desk at 4k. It isn't suitable for TV kino unless you're sitting 3 feet away.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's about right, I sit 6 feet from my 55 inch TV and it's more than adequate. I'd get a 65 inch for my next tv but no bigger, prices go full moron past 65.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            > it's more than adequate
            Not ideal
            >prices go full moron
            So you're making an economizing decision instead of making an argument for why it's the best size.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >the poorgay cope chart

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            bigger tvs are by no means more expensive. you can buy a garbage 100" tv at walmart.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I sit like 7feet away from my 85 inch and it's perfect. This chart always felt way fricking off.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            ok square-eyes

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Ohhh noooo I'm not sitting at the exact distance that the chart tells me to sitttttttt
              Lmao

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          extremely 'tarded
          aiming for 30deg is aiming for too little
          the practical limit is around 60deg, assuming 16:9, and its limiting in the *height*, not the width.
          if we're talking a TV for watching movies with even wider aspect ratios, you can comfortably aim for >60deg.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't make the rules, buddy. It isn't my fault that you sit too close to your TV.
            https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >b-but the poorgay rules..
              Lmao shut up, cuck.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              This is a braindead chart, designed to sell TVs that are completely below spec. If normalgays knew that the whole 40-80" range was a total waste of time, they'd riot.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >If normalgays knew that the whole 40-80" range was a total waste of time
                Explain?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                40" is fine for 1080p. For 4k in a living room, you will see zero difference if it's below 85".

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you will see zero difference
                Difference in what? Image quality? Or are you saying that in a typical living room setup you won't notice the difference between a 40" and 65"? I don't care about image quality, just want a big screen to watch sports on (golf and baseball). Totally get what you mean if the difference you're referring to is in image quality but if you mean the overall difference in size then I don't understand

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you want a big screen, just move closer to it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >crane your neck to stare above the fireplace at a small screen every time you want to watch the Astros play
                No thanks, would rather put a bigger TV up there and call it a day. Nothing wrong with a large TV above the fireplace, looks clean and allows for more seating/furniture/etc. at ground level

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >above the fireplace
                Ah, you're a total moron. Got it, don't worry about sizes. Pick up that 65" on credit, don't forget to pay for the extended warranty!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't really have your TV up above a fireplace do you anon?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >above the fireplace
                Ah, you're a total moron. Got it, don't worry about sizes. Pick up that 65" on credit, don't forget to pay for the extended warranty!

                >put TV in the corner
                >have to arrange the furniture/seating to face said corner
                >make your living room feel significantly smaller/closed off
                Or just put it above the fireplace and arrange the seating however you want, I don't see the problem? Muh hecking fireplace no no is such a Redditor take, same people that use the term "McMansion" unironically

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who said anything about a corner

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >he doesn't have a fireplace on every wall in the house
                coldgay

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                One wall is windows, one wall is the fireplace directly in the middle of the wall, no wall towards the kitchen, other wall is shorter and has the stairs going up. If I didn't have to put it above the fireplace then I would probably agree with you, but living rooms like mine are a diamond dozen, my (and many other people's) only options are above the fireplace or in the cuck corner

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a diamond dozen

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a newbie

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                millions will save

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >you will see zero difference
                Difference in what? Image quality? Or are you saying that in a typical living room setup you won't notice the difference between a 40" and 65"? I don't care about image quality, just want a big screen to watch sports on (golf and baseball). Totally get what you mean if the difference you're referring to is in image quality but if you mean the overall difference in size then I don't understand

                If you want a big screen, just move closer to it.

                4k is a meme all the way up. 1080p is all you ever need for movies. Display size is all that matters

                >$300 1080p 5 year old Epson projector blasted onto bedroom wall with no screen
                Blows girls' minds when they see it, don't see the need for anything fancier

                correct

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                you cant even buy a 1080 tv anymore, everything is 4k

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I want more immersion

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      55" I was constantly thinking "I wish it was a bit bigger"
      65" I never think that and can be fully immersed

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes I do. 85" is ~100% more screen than a 55" tv.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        yes and your poor little eyes will need to dart across in all directions to track the action, what a headache!
        on my 55" i get it all at once, no problems!

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          yes your poor little eyes will need to dart across in all directions to track the action, what a headache!
          on my 25" i get it all at once, no problems!

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            you were supposed to quote it, silly! maybe you need a bigger monitor, or more likely a bigger phone screen!

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      My house has an open design, so yes, the difference between a 55" and 75" TV is watching the TV from the family room and watching the TV from anywhere in the house you have line of sight with the wall.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cope. 55" is small enough to use as a monitor on a desk at 4k. It isn't suitable for TV kino unless you're sitting 3 feet away.

      there is no such thing as perfect, the important thing is the distance from the screen

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        No anon didn't you hear, that's poorgay logic

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    85" is about the absolute base minimum you'd want for 4k in a living room, with a viewing distance of around 5-6 feet away.

    The main issue with these large TVs is the total lack of any content to consume on them. 4k video standards are an absolute joke, bitrate starved junk that looks no better than 1080p BDs did. If you have a high end gaming PC and for some reason you despise sitting at a desk, they make sense. For everyone else, just get a 40" monitor.

    You will see no appreciable difference between 4k and 4k downscaled to 1080p for video. For games, there's a big difference, but most people don't have a top of the end rig that's putting out 4k120 to begin with.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    did your neo qled come free with a neovegana?

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't have a TV. I watch on my phone. I'm not an old man from last century.

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not liking this trend of YouTuber gays who just make videos bragging about their new shit with their wife

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Large tv sets are for overcompensating homosexuals with tiny dicks.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Poorgay with a tiny wiener

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they measure TV's in inches in countries that use the metric system

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Metric is inferior to customary units. Imperial system engaged the brain to work around its idiosyncrasies so as the 12 inches to a foot are visualized. Bases of ten, no mental effort is required and as such it is simply a digit in the mind.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You ever take a physics class? Ever had to solve a problem that was stated in non-metric units? The only reasonable way to do it is to convert to metric, solve, then convert the answer back to the stupid-ass units.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Metric is better for math. Imperial is better for real life.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        this
        F vs C is a great example. F is better because for the most part it tells us what the temp is relative to what humans experience 0-100 is essentially both extremes. Where as C is just a general scale not relative to how humans perceive temp

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You only think F is better because you grew up with it

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            No. It's also the same with lbs and kgs. Pounds are a better system for humans while kgs are good for math.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Who is doing the math?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              No, you're a moron. I live in a country that measures humans in lb, and everything else in grams because "muh old people".

              It's fricking stupid.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                send help

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              No, idiot. Kgs is better for humans because humans have ten fingers.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            This.

            this
            F vs C is a great example. F is better because for the most part it tells us what the temp is relative to what humans experience 0-100 is essentially both extremes. Where as C is just a general scale not relative to how humans perceive temp

            I know what room temperature is, what is air-con cold temp, what is body fever temp, what is sweltering hot, etc in C. No idea what they are in F. C is more natural for me.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              But normal body temperature isn't 100°F. It can't even get that right.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            F is better because it has more granularity in the range that matters. With C you're spending all your time in a 40 degree range from -10 to 30. With F you're spending all your time in a 100 degree range from 0 to 100. It's, ironically, the same argument people use for why the metric system is so good; it's out of 100.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              it's within that range when you're discussing weather, sure, but if you think there is a functional difference between saying it's an 18°C day and a 64°F day you're being dishonest. i know what an 18°C day feels like, I don't need a scale to 100 to tell me that. 0°C freezing and 100°C boiling are far more valuable than that.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Oh no, he's moronic. The metric system is good because it's base 10. Not because it's "out of 100".

              What's the difference between 71 F and 72 F? Oh, right, frick all.

              >it's 70% hot out today
              >this isn't intuitive
              Europeans are so fricking dumb, bros

              Livable ranges change depending on where you are. So "70% hot" for someone in California is going to be a hell of a lot different to "70% hot" for someone in Alaska.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Where as C is just a general scale not relative to how humans perceive temp
          what the frick does that mean? are you moronic?
          there is no difference its just numbers.
          french people understand that 0 is freezing and 36 is hot and can interpolate and extrapolate just as you understand 32-100 for the same numbers. dont be fricking stupid.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            F 0-100
            C -17-37
            Those describe the same temp range...which one is easier to correlate to how the human body understand feels temp?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              the one you grew up with? mong.
              anyway why does it make sense to have 0 be -17, a temp at which you would die quite quickly if exposed, and 100 be 37, a temp at which it is warm but perfectly possible to be alive for extended period? pretty arbitrary.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      55 inches sounds better than 139.7 centimetres

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      because they can get away with selling a 42.6 inch diagonal tv as 43 inch.
      if they measured in mm which they should all morons would be in the shop saying why is this screen size different and then everyone would have to actually grow a brain and learn about different screen layouts and manufacturing and why it turns out to certain sizes and aspects etc.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I know my car has 19" rims. I have no fricking idea how many cm that is unless I multiply it by 2.54, which I'm never going to do.
      t. East European

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >buy bigger screen
    >have to sit further away from it now
    it's embarrassing how easy you gays fall for israeli marketing. I bet you also bought into 4k.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not only do I have a 4k 65inch TV, but I only watch streaming services that I pay extra for the 4k version.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even $200 TVs are 4K now.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have 4 oleds in my place, all LG. Even my fricking gym room tv is an oled. Die, and go frick yourself too, wagie b***h.

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 75" 4k LG tv. Hardly use it now. Might rig my pc up to it and play flight sim though

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What’s this pic from? Want to see more of that chick’s ass

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wish they would use teenboy models.

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    50 inch is the perfect size for the end of my bed
    Don't see myself going bigger

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I bought a 65” Q70A QLED 4K HDR. People said it was garbage for £1100 and the backlight in dark scenes is pretty trash but its in a bright room, does vrr 120hz at 4k hdr from my pc so is pretty kino and I prefer bright over the rip off oleds.

    I have a 3070 and run persona 4 at 8k 120z hdr and its kino. Godzilla vs kong the kinoest of all movies looked amazing. Plus when I am decorating I connect my bluetooth speaker to it and can move it about the flat

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you waste money on huge tvs just to watch movies when you all have phones?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Everybody itt ignored my post. ;_;

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >why do people ignore my obvious troll post

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          And they say hurtful things. ;_;

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Currently have a 55" Samsung, next time I buy one 75" would be ideal

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    BUNDA

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Luv me inches
    Luv me pounds
    Luv me fahrenheit
    'Ate me europoors

    Simple as

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 77" A80J. Size is great, I have a decently large living room and I would be happy with something bigger too. Only downside is brightness for daytime viewing, but it's an OLED.

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    85" in the living room and 75" in the bedroom

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i have a 55 incher and i just sit close to it lmaoooooooooooo

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      i have a 214" tv, problem is i have to sit so far away from it can barely hear the sound off it.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        214cm, mate. Not inches.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          nope, its 9 72 inch taped together takes up the whole wall

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I actually bought that exact TV last week. After discounts it cost me about $5k, so I convinced myself to get a surround system with it.

    It looks great. I've got a large living room with vaulted ceilings, so it fits nicely and doesn't look too large.

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have an 85 inch QN90A for the living room. Great for movies once you get it setup properly for HDR. Great colors but you have to use low contrast enhancer for HDR because it's dim without it.

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    if youre looking at anything over 55inches/$1000, just get the short throw broseph

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 75 inch. It was 600 dollars. I use factory settings and have no speakers or soundbars.

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 120" ultra short throw with the ambient light rejecting / overhead light rejecting screen. 4k/8k looks pretty comfy, ngl.

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The last time I owned a TV was when plasma screens were in.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      y tho

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        My PC monitor and tablet are superior kino watching machines. TVs are outdated technology.

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a 77" and 65" OLED, and a 130" projector screen with a true 4k projector.

    Anyone that says projectors aren't good is some poorgay with a shit one, or poorgay cope. I don't bother going to the cinema anymore.

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a projector and I absolutely love it. But I mostly just watch shit on in the background. So video ends up being optional, lol
    I've had a lot of fun using the projector in photography ideas I come up with. I'm not officially doing a 365 project but it's like I never really ended the last one. So ymmv but when I do watch something I love it. The size, and if it's a movie I dim the lights and the "experience" is always kino.
    I run it at about 80 inches in my current arrangement.

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >cum provoking ass

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >YWN have a fat ass gf who helps you to build kino stations

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're holding the tv improperly anyways. Picking it up like that likely damaged the panel.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody cares nerd. Tvs are cheap

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          An 85" neo qled is $4000 USD with taxes included. Over 60% of people don't even have 1k in savings.

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i have a 75" screen
    its great! way bigger than I thought it would be

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    For comparison, what size is a regular cinema screen? I find that I dont care too much about watching movies at home to go bigger than 65'', very large tvs will simply never give you the cinema experience.
    If anything I think I care more about audio setup than image quality, but Im too lazy to do proper research and find out what would be best in my living room.

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >watches kino on a 65 inch mini led

    Works ok for me.

  43. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    70" is my biggest TV but I gave a 106" projector screen I use for the main screen. It's only really good at night though.

    the TV us 4k and the projector is only 1080p but yhe difference is not noticable at all.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Incredible kinostation

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >TV is 4k and the projector is only 1080p but the difference is not noticeable at all.

      lol riiiiiiiiiiiight

      get your eyes checked

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        you have to get within like 5 feet to tell the difference

        I don't have a fireplace, I just thought was the reason. What is the reason?

        it's just too high up and uncomfortable

  44. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    post a screenshot of a TV listing from your local electronics shop

  45. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Don't lump me in with Americans. I'm Canadian and we use a mix of imperial and metric. It is probably confusing for non-leafs but makes perfect sense to us.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting chart. In Australia it's metric unless it's a TV, height of a person, or wiener length

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >leafs confirmed more moronic than americans
      >does it rely on foriegners or are you telling a foriegner
      no, imperial, yes metric
      >is it scientific
      no imperial, yes metric

  46. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The low frame rate of film sucks and you pretty much got to use motion smoothing, takes fine tuning a bit and you’ll always have SOME artifacts

  47. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Are 3D tvs still a thing? I remember my boss had one and he made it seem like a big deal.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      just another fad like VR and 4k

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      no, no one gives a shit about 3D. 3D is one of those fads that keeps cycling in and then fading away.

  48. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I am british and use inches for tvs,fish tanks and my height

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >fish tanks for height
      Brits are fricking moronic

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you're not at least 5 tanks, 12 stone, and not making 100,000 pounds then you're not a real man.

  49. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I use C, I started last fall as an experiment. It's stupid F is superior for weather and even cooking.
    I can go either way on length and volume. If it's an electronics project I use metric. Work or an art project I use imperial.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're just a moron.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're a gay who can't into life if you don't intuitively grasp how super F is to C in terms of weather and food creation.
        Or is it fractions smoothbrain? Is that the issue?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          There is no functional difference, you only prefer one over the other because you're familiar with it

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >can't into
          Dumbest meme thing to say. Ever.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      based and correct

      You're just a moron.

      standard measurements were designed to occupy a comfortable and intuitive range. Weather is a perfect example. 0°F-100°F covers everything from very cold to very hot on an easy 0-100 scale.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        but very cold and very hot are relative to the individual

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >well you see it depends on various factors and cultural perspectives so nothing is really truly "knowable"
          blow it out your ass, redditor

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >0°F-100°F covers everything from very cold to very hot on an easy 0-100 scale.
        I don't understand the logic behind tying it to a 0-100 scale. Are Americans just too stupid to understand negative numbers?

        Ranges are relative to begin with.

        You're a gay who can't into life if you don't intuitively grasp how super F is to C in terms of weather and food creation.
        Or is it fractions smoothbrain? Is that the issue?

        There's nothing intuitive about it, you just grew up with it. You're the one complaining about fractions, because the one "utility" of F is that you don't have to do .5 of a degree. Except nobody on earth can judge distance to the degree anyway without a measurement tool, in C or in F. So the additional graduation is meaningless.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it's 70% hot out today
          >this isn't intuitive
          Europeans are so fricking dumb, bros

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >You're the one complaining about fraction
          I never said any such thing. I use both forms of measurement as I said. F is superior for weather and cooking. You clearly grew up with too much screen time, it's effects literally drop off your posts

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >superior for cooking
            what can you cook in Farenheit that can't be cooked in Celcius?

  50. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Getting my dad that exact TV for xmas this year, but it's 90% for sports and 10% news rather than kino.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Getting my dad that exact TV
      you can't afford that tv anon

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Make sure you turn on motion compensation for him. Guys like that love it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Getting my dad that exact TV for xmas this year, but it's 90% for sports
      guys like your dad are the reason why our society is falling apart, make sure to ask him which one of those black dudes he wants to impregnate his grandchildren.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        do you understand how weird it is to think those thoughts after seeing his comment? i mean to the point where i think you should repeat what you posted out loud and hear it back to yourself

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          it's not weird at all

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            i hope youre baiting because if not, fricking hell

  51. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Does anyone have a very large screen?
    Yes, 75" Roku.
    >What have you found to be the downsides?
    The initial setup was a little unwieldy. I have it mounted on my wall above my mantle, but there's only like 2 inches of clearance on the top and bottom. Basically, just make sure you measure thrice, cut once when positioning the wall mounts, because you DO NOT want to have to take it down when you realize you accidentally didn't center it and your ocd is eating away at you for two weeks.

    The TV itself is great. The kids like it. I like using it when I work out (I keep my dumbbells and treadmill in the family room; if the kids can take up 90% of the room with their toys, I can at least use 10% for mine).

  52. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I bought a short-throw 2 years ago and there's absolutely no fricking reason for me to go back to a regular TV
    Just get one

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      What if I want to turn a light on in the room?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you have a bright room, you might want to invest in an "ALR" screen (Ambient Light Rejecting)
        Still allows me to see things pretty nicely with the lights on but overall you want to have minimum light if possible.
        These screens are very effective though, I'd look into that if you're thinking about getting a short-throw

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          or I can just have a tv like a normal person and not need to worry about it

  53. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    just move your screen nearer to where you sit?? are you supposed to be 4x the screen size away from it? where so you sit, in a barn?

  54. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've got a short throw projector. It's fricking awesome having a 150" screen that basically takes up an entire wall. You get to see all the details in whatever kino you're watching.

    Only con would be if it's very sunny it's difficult to see very dark shows.

    Definitely the best purchase I've ever made.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sunny? You don't have a dedicated movie room without windows? Poorgay detected.

  55. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm getting a new TV soon. Do I need to be worried about the hertz making my blu-rays look weird? The opera effect I guess.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      if you're talking about 120hz motion interpolation then yes turn it off if enabled.

  56. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Giant tvs are ok if you live in northern lattitudes. But if you live somewhere with hot summers, these tvs produce an enormous amount of heat. You could literally use them to heat your house.

  57. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >buy new tv
    >turn off every feature
    does anyone not do this? everything set by default makes the tv worse, i don't know why they bother

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Normies don't care / don't perceive those atrocities unfortunately

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I just went through this
      >sound is tinny as frick
      >locate "AI audio enhancement"
      >disable
      >audio is 500% better
      There were so many fricking "AI dimming" "AI contrast" etc etc that all looked like shit.

  58. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    In my friend group, there's a younger couple that got some tax returns & also conned a co-worker out of a large sum of money and bought some 80+ inch tv for some crazy amount like 1500$.

    Instead of, literally doing anything else with the money. Savings? What are those?

    Anyway, the TV is broken now and the warranty expired a couple months ago. lol.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >crazy amount
      >$1500

      Am I actually rich or is everyone just poor here?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's a crazy amount to spend 9n something dumb like a TV. I've never paid more than $200 for a TV. My projector+screen was like $1000 though.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          My projector was $10k+. Guess everyone is poor, thanks for confirming.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            you simply overpaid. There is no upgrade in the world over my setup worth $9k.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You sure?

              Not even a dedicated blacked out movie theatre for your kino, pathetic

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                imagine watching a movie during daytime anyway

                >being so delusional and unable to cope with the real world you fill every inch of your view with screens
                this poster will never not be a man

                correct?

                you cant even buy a 1080 tv anymore, everything is 4k

                projectors come in 1080p. TVs are a waste of money for what you get. That's why I only pick up broken ones and fix them for cheap.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >behold: numbers!
                okay? No ine would actually notice or care between your $10 rig and a $1k one if the screen size is the same.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes but the screen is 130". The setup pic was the only one I had on hand, sorry anon

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >being so delusional and unable to cope with the real world you fill every inch of your view with screens
              this poster will never not be a man

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're just a moron with money.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Figuratively speaking, that's more than that couple collectively makes in several months time, so yes, it was an impulsive decision that we all kind of questioned

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Tons of people on Cinemaphile are actual third worlders. Indians, Vietnamese, Argentinians, Brazilians, Philippinos, etc. Even if they're making good money money the country they can still be broke as frick by American standards. Its not like TV are actually cheaper in those place, they just buy weird trash brands you've never heard of.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        ~60% of people don't have $1000 in savings.

  59. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bigger the better. Rocking a 5 grand 83” C1 OLED. It’s barely big enough in my room sitting on the couch about 7 feet away. If you want to enjoy Kino with multiple people on a couch you need to go big or else it looks weird with it so close.

  60. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    4K 120Hz Projector.
    120" screen.

    Other than needing a dark room for optimal contrast, it's fricking amazing. If you get one, be sure to invest in some framing. Don't just throw a picture up on the wall and call it done. Perceived contrast goes up if you have a black border around your screen (doesn't have to be very thick).

  61. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anything bigger than 42 inch is too big for me tbh

  62. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >$300 1080p 5 year old Epson projector blasted onto bedroom wall with no screen
    Blows girls' minds when they see it, don't see the need for anything fancier

  63. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    When you need to physically turn your head to see ammunition in games like a moron. Or when 2 characters are talking your looking back and forth. I sold mine for a smaller size, realised I was just being a superficial consumer looking for the biggest thing evarrr etc. Also after a while it just becomes the norm and you don't notice till you go to someone else's house.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      32in is optimal for video games. Big screens are for kino.

  64. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Downside was me falling for the meme wall stand on a sviwell because my friends talked me into because "dude you are gonna wish you had one, I use it all the time"

    Yeah I havent used it fricking once. And since the sviwell hinge is slightly to the side from the center line, it displaces the weight unevenly and now my tv is like one degree tilted to the left. Not annoying enought to take it off, but annoying enough that I am aware of it constantly

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't need a pivoting stand because I simply always sit in the best seat in the room.

  65. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do all modern tvs come with smart app shit, input lag, loading screens, and advertisements built into menus? Asking from ignorance. I haven't bought a tv since I first moved out.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but you can simply not connect it to the internet.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but it's up to you whether you connect your TV to the internet

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but you can dns black hole almost all of it and only keep the useful stuff.

      [...]
      >put TV in the corner
      >have to arrange the furniture/seating to face said corner
      >make your living room feel significantly smaller/closed off
      Or just put it above the fireplace and arrange the seating however you want, I don't see the problem? Muh hecking fireplace no no is such a Redditor take, same people that use the term "McMansion" unironically

      I thought you weren't supposed to put it above the fireplace because of heat.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >above the fireplace because of heat.
        not true at all and easily verified yourself. Have you even tried feeling how hot a mantle gets?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't have a fireplace, I just thought was the reason. What is the reason?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            NTA but the reason is you're supposed to put your TV at eye-level and not up in the air so that you aren't cranking your neck up

  66. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I haven't read this thread and I'm not going to but let me guess, a bunch of poorgays shitting on projectors because all they've watched is a 500 dollar piece of shit being projected on a wall?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Obviously. They've never seen shit like laser projection.

  67. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >solves the fireplace problem

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      tism

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's a superpower

  68. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    my 4k 75" LG was £1200.
    I just bought a new pc monitor SAMSUNG Odyssey Neo G8 4K Ultra HD 32" Curved Quantum Dot Gaming Monitor240hz for £1240

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Search for "Samsung Odyssey neo g8 scanlines" and make sure yours doesn't bother you. All of those 240hz curved monitors have scanline issues.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ive had no issues with it so far. had it maxed out oneverything and tried it on the 120 and 240 modes. Im using a 4090 so im hoping I should be ok

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Like I said, look into it. Check the corners with certain blue and orange shades, for example. That problem can happen regardless of what refresh rate you're running.

  69. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    55 inch is the sweet spot for getting girls wet and ready after netflix. any bigger and they think you are a nerd.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      When she walks into my house and sees my 85" tv and my massive sectional couch she is instantly wet because it's a display of wealth that she cannot afford for herself. You're renting an apartment with a tiny 55", no woman has ever even seen your TV.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The difference here is that your situation is a hypothetical

  70. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Samsung's are shite

  71. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Huge tv's are unaesthetic.
    t. interior designer

  72. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >massive TVs
    >thread full of flat and light cuckboxes

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have my old TV from when I was a kid and all my old systems setup in my office. It's perfect to play old video games on, but not for watching kino.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm kind of tempted to watch stuff like Ringu on it though, or 80s/90s horror in general

  73. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >anon where's your tv? you mean you've got a projector? like we had in high school?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah babe just let my grab my laptop and an hdmi cable once the torrent is done

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dropping a projector screen down is worse than pulling out a laptop and hdmi cable. It's the best way to preserve your virginity.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        there's nothing wrong with the laptop and HDMI cable btw, it's just a bizarre meme pushed here by people (who I assume) have likely never felt the touch of a woman.

        everyone I've showed it to were thrilled that we could watch movies that weren't limited to whatever bullshit streaming apps they or their parents pay for lol

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          the meme was probably started by the industry in an attempt to make it "uncool" to watch shit for free, the same way they trick people into buying name brand shit instead of the same cheaper alternative.

  74. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The larger your screen, the more likely you are to dress like this guy and start a funko collection. 55" is what we in the business refer to as the "Goldilocks Zone".

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      he's literally dressed normally

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        ISHYGDDT

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >we in the business
      what business, gay porn?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes that's the one

  75. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Projector is way better than TV. 135 inch screen for $200. 1080p projector for $500. A TV this big will cost you $300k... projector looks better than TV too. Way more cinematic than OLED

  76. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bought a 65 inch LG C2 awhile back for TV and vidya. israelite bastards don't put headphone jacks on larger models so had to get a fricking Digital to Analog converter.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I haven't seen a headphone jack on a TV in forever, dude.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        42 and 48 have them

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          They almost certainly share PCBs. Just open the chassis and see if the circuit is populated or not. If not you might be able to swap in a board from one of those models, hopefully wouldn't require a firmware flash.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Which is israeli horseshit. I hate keeping shit charged and I hate lag. Shouldn't have to buy a fricking powered adapter to have a worse version as to if they just included the fricking jack.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Normal people just use speakers for a TV, dude.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah and so do I but I want headphone support so I can have it loud without people complaining.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I can have it loud without people complaining.
              You don't have your own house?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Then buy an amplifier for the speakers that has a headphone jack. Connecting directly to the TV is moronic, people stopped doing it for a reason.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tvs have bluetooth too

  77. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >short throw projector
    not do it, the black levels will be an abomination. Get an oled, dont worry about burn in. You will love it.

  78. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Panasonic flagship OLED (the best) not available in NA
    NAbros it's over. Euros and Nippon won.

  79. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Duuude if you get this screen, you get so much aaassss

  80. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1080pixels stretched over 85 inches
    it probably looks like shit

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      the problem was always negative space and pixel density, not the resolution itself. Run 1080p to a new 4k TV and compare to a 1080p TV of the same size from 2008. Old ones screen door like hell.

  81. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Imagine clicking all those posts just because people use a particular system of measurement

    >You are so fricking moronic
    Take a seat

  82. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    At 50 inches and above, tv size doesn't really matter given correct distance from tv. At that point only the content you watch on it, the quality of the image and your own ability to enjoy the entertainment is going to improve your happiness. Not another 15-25 inches of tv.

    I have enjoyed some of the highest kino film experiences on a shitty laptop monitor, on a 720p 32 inch lcd screen while also having suffered trough absolute slop on the LG 77 inch oled tv.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >yeah dude, so I told her after 5 inches anything bigger doesn't matter

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >compensating for your tiny dick by buying a bigger tv

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >tell me you're a virgin without telling me you're a virgin

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >MY DICK IS OLED 65"
        >RESPECT ME

  83. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Black person
    TV, monitors, and any general screen sizes are in inches even in metric countries
    (and i'll never understand metricgays. my euro country uses metric too but why should every human on earth have the same systems of measurement? that's the DEFINITION of globohomo. learn how to convert you dumb monkey)

  84. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  85. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Base ten has been a curse on humanity.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *