Men bros... is this true?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Men bros... is this true?
Men bros... is this true?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
ok and?
It's true, but not nearly to the same degree that the last batch of women's eggs are degraded.
what does that have to do with anything?
Did you read the text in OP's picture?
did you?
Yes I did. Are you doing ok?
> YOU GOOD BRO? YOU GOOD? YOU DOING OKAY OVER THERE BRO? NEED SOME HELP BRO?
Good answer but "no" is shorter.
Yes and its been common knowledge for thousands of years. In Plato’s Republic it was recommended that only men and women under thirty should procreate to create the strongest offspring.
Plato also believed that women were merely a receptacle for semen, and a man could conceive a child if he ejaculated in any warm orifice, even the dirt.
Life would be a dream if that were true
men's sperm was stronger in those days
It was true back then. Cumming in the dirt gave birth to earth elementals.
Can you prove that that wasn't true back in those days? Not very scientific to make assumptions.
>he hasn't impregnated his earthfu with his seed and created Chad rock golem sons
this is literally true. Low T wasnt an issue back then, no microplastics
>Plato also believed that women were merely a receptacle for semen
Isnt this true? Idk why you put it along with that other rubbish.
When I'm middle aged and balding I will lure in young and breedable women with my engineer money and there's NOTHING post-wall roasties can do about it.. We won bros.
Enjoy raising your autistic children.
Did yours enjoy it?
It doesn’t work, my parents had me at 22 and I’m autistic as frick. It’s all a fricking lie.
Kek not true at all.
spastic, i bet your dad was 50 when you were born which is why you are low functioning autistic and have allergies hahaha
admit it admit it hahaha
Cope
The entertainment industry letting twitter users write their movies and shows has been a disaster for humanity
It's from the comic you moron. She's telling him to knock up as many women as possible fast because there's infinite young women but only one young man. This isn't some gender wars bullshit.
>have glasses
>talk about other people being genetically impaired
>You criticize society... and yet you live in one.
>he’s not aware of the urbanization-glasses correlation
Fine wine bros....
You lied to me....
The volume of semen produced decreases with age, but DNA is still DNA. Leave it to a woman to make a strawman argument on shit about which she has no personal experience.
Nope. The quality of sperm degrades with age as well, which increases the probability of autism and other defects.
Both men and women get worse over time, but the "fine wine" morons on this board will never accept reality.
Feel free to post literally any proof from a reputable study
I agree I'd like to see a study, though Ive heard all cells degrade in DNA quality perpetually since birth
>The analysis revealed that children born to men aged 35 to 60 are up to 24 percent more likely to have autism than children with fathers aged 31 to 34. Likewise, children born to women aged 32 to 46 are up to 34 percent more likely to have autism than those born to women who are 29 to 31.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27637201/
So did that cross reference???
No lol
>includes men from 35 to 60
>women from 32 to 46
kek do you not see what's wrong here?
t. moron born to old parents
Um.... not that anon but you're moronic
my parents both had me in their 20s so you are wrong on literally everything kek
>20s
>not old
Exquisite bait.
too obvious bait anon, this is my last (you)
A bait within a bait
Bravo nolan
Ironing
>do you not see what's wrong here?
Of course not, because it doesn't support the narrative they try to push. These people can't be reasoned with, and truth and facts don't matter to them.
>truth and facts
Post the study.
>make a bullshit claim
>nooooooooo you need to post the studies that prove im not full of shit
Not how it works sweaty
So no truth or facts then?
None needed. You've been refuted through logic alone. Keep seething 🙂
I accept your concession.
>dosent have an argument
>posts no evidence
>dosent understand basic logic
>doesn't use the phrase correctly
Lol. Lmao even
What point are you trying to make? The study isn’t comparative.
>not peer reviewed
>extremely limited in scope
>no cross references
>clear as day fricked up testing
>focused only on the danes
this is like writing something on Medium and calling yourself a writer, lol.
How was your first year of community college, man?
This post says a lot more about you than it does me.
Good, how was your first year of deluding yourself into thinking you will ever be a woman?
>this is like writing something on Medium and calling yourself a writer,
That's little different than what the "professional journalists" do these days....
So men 60 years old have a 76% chance of creating beautiful normal children.
Got it, thank you.
>24%
>from 0.1% to 0.124%
Exactly. It’s nothing.
All the copers in the replies
IF YOURE PAST 35 DO NOT PROCREATE UNIRONICALLY WE LEARNED THIS IN HEALTH CLASS AND U STILL COPE
probably more like 30 before autism rates shoot up
For women yes. Not men.
I just realized she's Kim's sister.
Nah its just woman cope. Men in their 70s knock women up and the kids come out just fine. Young women though. You try to put a kid in a woman over 30 and that's when you get these deformed, autism ridden morons that pop out. Doesn't help that they're downing wine by the box and popping anti depressants like they're candy.
loving every laugh
I mean women just CAN'T have children past a certain age. Thats just Nature.
Men on the other hand have a good supply of sperm until they stop getting erections.
>screaming like a wild animal
I’m laughing like a wild animal atm tbqh
She could always buy a baby with all that money she made with her fancy career.
>Have baby at 22
>raise it for 10-12 years or until you can leave it at home without it killing itself
>start career in early 30s
Why the frick don't women just do this?
>go to college to learn latest advancements and ways of doing things
>then proceed to take yourself out of the work place for 12+ years
>you're now old and have no valuable skills compared to people fresh out of college
makes sense you post frogs, you're dumb as a rock. perchance your parents are old?
>Go to college later
That's what my mother did
It isn't impossible or anything, it's just a very difficult path. By the time you finish undergrad you'll be mid 30s, and depending on field of work that can be extremely unfriendly to people with little work experience coming in, for obvious reasons.
>>go to college to learn latest advancements and ways of doing things
And then you find out when you're in the field that's not what they do at all. Happened to me.
You fell for the debt meme.
>Go to college and build debt
>Work for a few years to try and pay off debt
>Meet a man and start and family and pass your debt to him
>Leave workplace to raise kids
Smarter women would know if they wanted to start a family they shouldn't go to college
What the FRICK does this have to do with someone who has a kid early and then decides to go back to school and enter the work force later? Do you even read the shit you're responding to???
>Meet a man and start and family and pass your debt to him
This is the exact scenario the sexless incels complain about
Dumbest take
my mom did this and I would've been fine if my dad had stayed around
Nobody wants to spend their 20s raising a brat, are you moronic
yeah this
modern propaganda bullshit
Sex & The City destroyed a generation of women. But it also made them so unsympathetic, unlikeable c**ts that I cherish these moments where they are mentally & emotionally destroyed on display for everyone to see.
I won't even laugh at her. It's sad that society lied to her and ruined her life.
I agree. Women are completely susceptible to propaganda and social pressure from peers, government and media. This is like laughing at child you told to play in traffic.
she's hot would smash her barren puss
>underlined paragraph
>that one episode of the 3 Stooges where they work at a fertility clinic
you counter that by having the baby with a young woman
yeha my dad was old and i'm here so there must have been something wrong
>in 1996 66 year old Clint Eastwood became a father again at age 63
100% bullshit.
This is just some bitter shit that dumb c**ts try to perpetuate because they're bitter that their uterus becomes barren while men can plant seeds until the day they die....and they DO.
>here's one example that disproves the trend
Did you have an old father?
No.
Both of my parents were in their early 20's, and yet I was born with a fricked up eye despite nobody in the family ever sharing such a maladie. But I guess that doesn't help your shitty argument, does it?
>no
Deh!
He was 66, not 63.
I used to wait on that girl, Fran, and her wretched prostitute of a mother francis fisher
>66 at 63
what
projection
Absolutely. If anything it’s too generous. That’s why I pumped out 6 kids by 29.
If you don’t have at least 3 kids by 30 then literally geld yourself.
How’s life being poor?
It's true. Apparently when the father is 50, the chances of the child having schizophrenia skyrocket. My father was 49 and I'm only moronic and have to count myself lucky. I highly recommend against it.
Maybe? But not at all comparable to the way roastie's eggs degrade after 30.
I'm 26 and a virgin. I have everything else in my life together, top-tier job, hobbies, Cinemaphile, etc. But I will probably not be able to catch up on my low woman gains until mid 30s. Hopefully my children will be fine as long as it's with some 20-something b***h
My body my choice
Not if you're a man.
Eugenics trash.
No, it's yet another israeli lie in an attempt to make fewer white men even try to reproduce.
My dad was 50 and mom was 32 and I turned out like this.
Some serious eugenicist implications to this statement.
that's women, welfare in the streets, eugenics in the sheets
>Men bros... is this true?
no, LK had two of em when he was 66
thought it was fitting.
JESUS FRICK
I-I mean, good for his dick I guess, but those poor fricking kids to have a walking corpse as a father
>poor kids
>have larry king fortune
>maybe dad tells cool stories about old actors, celebrities, politicians, etc.
Who knows maybe he was a good dad
frick my dad had me after the he had 50 years
>frick my dad
No thanks
>ITT nothing but worthless anecdotes
Not true. Women's eggs degrade rapidly though.
It's over mansisters
>sisters
Frick you and your cringe beta male meme.
It's not.
Women should not breed past 20 and should be publicly executed at 25.
Your move prostitute.
Somewhat true but her "entirely" remark is incorrect.
As medicine becomes more and more precise, sperm quality is likely to be defined in a way that will preclude issues. At any rate men still have a better shot at becoming parents late in life than women.
Would those same lines be uttered in a movie/series these days if they were about women or midgets or people with serious degenerative issues? Some of these fragile types would probably whine about prejudice and whatnot
>Trusting anything Asian women have to say
It's true. People shouldn't reproduce after 30. You have these elite millionaire or billionaire guys get a trophy wife who pops out kids when he's 45 or older, and it produces fricked up kids. this is how you get Kelly Baltazars and CWC (dads both over 40).
A bio-ethicist has urged males to freeze sperm at 18 to avoid this.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-33253278
>A bio-ethicist has urged males to freeze sperm at 18 to [make money by charging them out the ass to collect and store samples]
ftfy
The amount of money the medical industry makes convincing dumb b***hes that they can simply freeze their eggs for future use is incredible. I guess men aren't dumb enough to do it to, so they're probably trying to create a market by convincing gullible dumbass men that they won't be able to have normal kids past a certain point, which is 100% bullshit.
Even if it was true the way male reproduction works is fundamentally different than females. If a guy produces a few morono spermtids then they are just going to swim around in circles while the healthier ones swim for the egg.
Women on the other hand release only one egg a month, and while a genetically impaired ones may have a hindered fertilization and gestation, it is not competing against other eggs.
sure, ugly asiatics could argue for eugenics, but... should they?
Entirely false. Sperm don't live long enough to suffer any degradation of the genetic material. Women are born with all their eggs rather than constantly producing more, so they do start degrading eventually.
Source: my ass
>literally not a single post about the show the OP came from
topkek what a piece of shit series.
reminder this was canceled shortly after the second episode aired. can only assume your average $5 CW show had better numbers
True but the mother's age is FAR MORE impactful when it comes to the baby's health. If the guy is 45 and woman 20, the baby will probably be fine with a 1 out of a million chance of getting some kind of autism. If the guy is 20 and woman 45, the baby will have a pretty considerable chance of having some kind of autism, if a 45yo woman even manages to birth that baby.
honestly men should all get a vasectomy at birth and it shouldn't be reversed until they're in a marriage and their wives can vouch for their quality as a breeding partner. too many low value males end up producing low value offspring right now
And what governing authority do you think has the power to make this happen?
I do.
Then castrate me right now, at risk of your own life.
omw lol
3D pigs like this asiatic lose their value after 20.
I castrate you and cut off the veganas of every schizo femoid who would even think about that and not apologize by sucking my dick.
Imagine discussing something that hasn't been peer reviewed, lol.
social studies aren't science in the first place
With regards to males, volume of sperm is what is noticeably affected by age. Quality of sperm is retained well into older age. A male in his 60's may find it more difficult to inseminate a woman than a younger man, but the child will otherwise be normal. The same is not the case in reverse. Even though women retain eggs into their 40's, having children past the age of 30 comes with a host of risks, and past 40 even more at higher levels of risk.
Basically known biology and yet this thread is full of cope and seethe
>Quality of sperm is retained well into older age
Source?
Not him but did some digging.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28472913/
Basically older men have less testosterone and sperm *mobility* goes down, it's suspected that sperm quality also decreases but there's no solid data
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151353/
>Increased age in infertile men is associated with an increase in sperm concentration and diploidy, as well as a decline in semen volume and sperm vitality. However motility, morphology and DNA fragmentation are not affected by male age.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993171/
Male fertility is impacted by age (which we all agree on already).
Source typed "sperm quality and aging nih" into duckduckgo, if you want to check more studies.
thank you anon
Naah, it's the othet way around, sperm is regularly produced while eggs aren't and if the woman is fertilized at 40+ that's an old egg and the child is at high risk to get things like Down's.
>SOURCE: DUDE TRUST ME
>make something up
>provide no evidence
>ackshually YOU need to PROVE to ME that im objectively wrong
Is this the product of zoomer education? When did people become this stupid
Partially poor education partially social media letting people create highly dopaminergic echo chambers.
Basically people don't learn to defend their beliefs and they just block anyone who might force them to, and when blocking isn't an option they deflect because engaging with what the other person is saying is not a skill they ever learned. It's depressing because often it is as easy as typing some key words into a search engine to find a reputable source for what you think, like
did.
Posting a source in this shithole is pointless because anyone who doesn't agree with the findings will just discount it as israeli propaganda, as has been seen ITT. At best you're only going to confirm beliefs and biases.
Cope
do you have a source that's a cope?
Sure but at least by posting a source you're demonstrating that you can at least try to defend what you're saying.
Obviously blindly copying and pasting links doesn't count as critical thinking but at least you're not literally making shit up.
I remember some guy claiming "literally every scientific study on the subject" says white people are more intelligent than black people and when badgered to provide a single such study he repeated himself until the thread 404'd.
If someone checks your source and objects to it or provides evidence that it's not reputable, that's one thing, but saying "israeli propaganda" and stopping there is just an admission of defeat in my opinion.
Congrats on doing better than the guy I mentioned did.
I've never read it myself so I freely admit I have no argument for or against your source.
have you guys noticed that we talk about everything BUT movies in this board? we're talking about biology here, gays are talking about laws in the flash thread, gays are talking about politics in the Pinocchio thread. just what the frick.
Cinemaphile is where leftists morons go to fight the culture war
Cinemaphile is where fascist Chud virgins go to pretend they have friends.
>Anonymous 06/14/22(Tue)17:13:33 No.169604243▶
>File: 1650994971651.png (216 KB, 1024x676)
Whoa im totally convinced youre not an assmad leftist troon now. Kek
>Whoa im totally convinced youre not an assmad leftist troon now. Kek
The eternal cope and seethe
Movies and shows provoke conversation. When we see someone in a movie or show say some stupid shit, we discuss how fricking wrong they are.
Even if it's true, which it's not, why would I care what a post-30 woman thinks?
Well she would know a thing or two about degrading with age, wouldn't she? Don't be a moron.
One confounding variable in studying autism rates in children of older fathers is that, possibly, men with more 'tism genes (even if not full-blown autists) reproduce later than normal men. I'm not just pulling this out of my ass I believe the studies discuss it although it's been a while since I looked at em.
I've read the same but it's still very unclear to what degree autism is heritable at all.
I'd suspect quite a bit considering how female autism is easily hidden at moderate levels and essentially invisible at low levels.
I'm selling my unvaxxed sperm on ebay.
yes, and its a huge part why todays children are almost all moronic in some way
if one parent is old there is a chance to compensate via the second genome, but nowadays the women are 30+ and the men 40+ which gives a completely toxic combination
autism, adhd, bipolar, homosexuality, transsexuality
do you think these things just randomly turned up?
The idea that all of those things are 100% a result of older parents is just stupid.
My parents had my little sister when they were both 43 and she's cutest damn thing in the world, even if she's an autistic furry.
is she hot?
She is 8 years old anon, frick off.
how can a kid be an "autistic furry" wtf
that makes it sound like she's a teenager
She has no friends and draws furries all day. Nothing sexual of course they're more like sonic OCs. Super proud of showing them to me.
that's cute. sorry for making it weird
He's the moron who thinks drawing animal people is inherently "furry" when the kid 8 years old
Post her drawings
Who cares? All they make is Barneyshit
short answer no
long answer no
as you get older your sperm will have increased frick ups but not all the sperm will be fricked up. so you will make more sperm. the female eggs will wipe out your fricked up sperm before it gets to the egg and your fricked up sperm will not be able to fertilize the egg.
Until you are about 55 to 60 that's what happens. then after 60 your sperm count goes down and the damage to your sperm increases but once again the females will sort it out and eliminate the weak and fricked up sperm.
there you go. you just cum in a woman and she gets knocked up. she has a shit ton of things to destroy and filter your screwed up sperm.
I swear to god this site is almost all foreigners with youtube educations. this is middleschool science here guys. sigh...
dunno , being a father seems like a lot of responsibility and me...Im just into hanging and bangin
What does it feel to be a man?
Well. You get attention for saying and doing good things. And you feel good
Children get attention for saying moron shit and getting insulted. Then they feel good.
Men build.
Children sperg.
The way you get attention is up to you. That's it.
>homosexuals, trannies, and feminists hate the fact they're not normal men so much they create shit-tier threads like this just to get themselves pwned by reality
this crazy b***h was so cringe it hurts to think about it
ideally men and women should get married by 20 at the latest and begin pumping out kids shortly thereafter. but feminism and women gaining rights fricked everything up
>literally produces schizo kids
explains why Cinemaphile always defends men having kids at 60
I agree but if we're jabbing let's talk about women and how their risk of fricking dying during childbirth skyrockets after 30
woman semen retent create homunclus megazord sperm baby