Boring ass basedshit that obviously a24 would distribute. I thought britshits were supposed to be subtle and understated when it comes to their comedy and parody. Garland is so fricking gay but yuropoors eat his shit up lmao
You could be simply too distracted. Even with shitty movies such as this one, attention is always rewarded.
while I was watching, it gave me the unsettling feeling she was supposedly getting. I could tell something was off, beyond them acting weird, but couldn't tell why.
anyway, didn't enjoy the movie, except for the visuals at times and Jessie Buckley.
As soon as the mc arrives in Cotson the movie goes into unreliable narrator mode: the same actor playing different roles is meant to highlight the unsubtle, midwit idea that "all men are equal".
I agree w you, Jessie and cinematography were the movie's only 2 good aspects.
It literally attempts to imply that ALL men are bad and in different ways persecute/harass women throughout history since Adam. That's it.
It tries to disregard the instances in which women and weak in general have been protected by men and paints every single male character negatively.
It also tries to dismiss institutions (police, Church) as sexist, again disregarding the countless cases in which women were and are protected by them.
And he got worse in the sense of subjugating whatever creativity he had to these heavyhanded woke talking points and false tropes.
Almost an attempt to submit and be "accepted" by the current Hollywood establishment.
Ex Machina at least had a subtle point in that the robot's decision, though heartless, was logic-driven within that specific story.
>And he got worse in the sense of subjugating whatever creativity he had to these heavyhanded woke talking points and false tropes. >Almost an attempt to submit and be "accepted" by the current Hollywood establishment.
yeah that's true. what is he hoping for? to direct a Marvel movie?
>yeah that's true. what is he hoping for?
Be part of the current system and/or at least be spared from being cancelling attempts/ostracism because he is (oh noes!) a white man.
Chickenshit directors/screenwriters such as Garland are kowtowing to the insane sjw mediocrities that are currently sinking Hollywood.
>movie about male female relationships >it's about "toxic behaviour" >every single time that means women are pure but the men in their life are bad and ruin their life
I miss movies like The War of the Roses were both parties are making each other lifes hell. I bet in reality she was a huge c**t
I personally think that toxic masculinity is a real thing and a problem, but so is female one. its interesting that only the male one is seen as a big deal though even though female manipulate and torture their surroundings just as much as men.
>I personally think that toxic masculinity is a real thing and a problem, but so is female one.
You're using leftist terminology to define the concept of generally bad people. There is no "toxic" anything. Just shitty buttholes from all walks of life. Please stop using "toxic" to describe fricking anything negative. Expand your vocabulary a little bit.
their definition implies a "learned" toxicity. things like men not being allowed to cry, in general being rewarded for being agressive, etc. of course they do get rewarded by women also and there is also "toxic" behaviour in women like girls not getting the same ammount of punishment as children or getting praise for half assing things because its cute but when a boy does it he gets scolded for not trying harder
>a "learned" toxicity. things like men not being allowed to cry, in general being rewarded for being agressive, etc.
Now you're just discussing social mores and taboos. Again, you're pigeonholing your thoughts about the world using leftist rhetoric as a template. Expand your thought process. Think back to what you learned in elementary school. You'll find that twitter does not have to be the foundation of your worldview.
the movie had some good creepy moments. it would have been much more interesting if it leaned more into the folk horror and just been subtle about some of the themes
I thought it sucked ass and wish I hadn’t wasted my time. Garland fell off hard as frick
a very boring Apple products commercial
one of those movies that men really can't understand.
Boring ass basedshit that obviously a24 would distribute. I thought britshits were supposed to be subtle and understated when it comes to their comedy and parody. Garland is so fricking gay but yuropoors eat his shit up lmao
Awful. Good cinematography but ultimately no plot: beneath the folk horror veneer, it's a pathetic "all le men bad" non-story.
if I didn't notice the same actor played all the men am I faceblind?
it was especially moronic when he played the fricking kid
while I was watching, it gave me the unsettling feeling she was supposedly getting. I could tell something was off, beyond them acting weird, but couldn't tell why.
anyway, didn't enjoy the movie, except for the visuals at times and Jessie Buckley.
As soon as the mc arrives in Cotson the movie goes into unreliable narrator mode: the same actor playing different roles is meant to highlight the unsubtle, midwit idea that "all men are equal".
I agree w you, Jessie and cinematography were the movie's only 2 good aspects.
You could be simply too distracted. Even with shitty movies such as this one, attention is always rewarded.
>Same actor plays all the men because men are all the same
Wow so deep
except when they needed to insert the diversity hire
if they pulled a Robert Downey Jr at least the movie would have some balls (no pun intended)
>No plot
>Boring
>Makes no sense
>Men are... le bad
what was the point of the movie? I seriously dont get why it was made besides "lets make artsy movie with some body horror because"
>my husband bad
>actually all men bad
It literally attempts to imply that ALL men are bad and in different ways persecute/harass women throughout history since Adam. That's it.
It tries to disregard the instances in which women and weak in general have been protected by men and paints every single male character negatively.
It also tries to dismiss institutions (police, Church) as sexist, again disregarding the countless cases in which women were and are protected by them.
all three of Garland's movies are like that if you think about it. makes you wonder
And he got worse in the sense of subjugating whatever creativity he had to these heavyhanded woke talking points and false tropes.
Almost an attempt to submit and be "accepted" by the current Hollywood establishment.
Ex Machina at least had a subtle point in that the robot's decision, though heartless, was logic-driven within that specific story.
>And he got worse in the sense of subjugating whatever creativity he had to these heavyhanded woke talking points and false tropes.
>Almost an attempt to submit and be "accepted" by the current Hollywood establishment.
yeah that's true. what is he hoping for? to direct a Marvel movie?
>yeah that's true. what is he hoping for?
Be part of the current system and/or at least be spared from being cancelling attempts/ostracism because he is (oh noes!) a white man.
Chickenshit directors/screenwriters such as Garland are kowtowing to the insane sjw mediocrities that are currently sinking Hollywood.
Very organic thread, can't wait to see the deep discussion going on ITT
>movie about male female relationships
>it's about "toxic behaviour"
>every single time that means women are pure but the men in their life are bad and ruin their life
I miss movies like The War of the Roses were both parties are making each other lifes hell. I bet in reality she was a huge c**t
it was pretty good, perma virgins be seething tho
men bros why are we so evil. all women want is unconditional love from chad and every other man leaving them alone except when they need something
I personally think that toxic masculinity is a real thing and a problem, but so is female one. its interesting that only the male one is seen as a big deal though even though female manipulate and torture their surroundings just as much as men.
>I personally think that toxic masculinity is a real thing and a problem, but so is female one.
You're using leftist terminology to define the concept of generally bad people. There is no "toxic" anything. Just shitty buttholes from all walks of life. Please stop using "toxic" to describe fricking anything negative. Expand your vocabulary a little bit.
their definition implies a "learned" toxicity. things like men not being allowed to cry, in general being rewarded for being agressive, etc. of course they do get rewarded by women also and there is also "toxic" behaviour in women like girls not getting the same ammount of punishment as children or getting praise for half assing things because its cute but when a boy does it he gets scolded for not trying harder
>implies
Your inference does not necessitate anyone's implication.
>a "learned" toxicity. things like men not being allowed to cry, in general being rewarded for being agressive, etc.
Now you're just discussing social mores and taboos. Again, you're pigeonholing your thoughts about the world using leftist rhetoric as a template. Expand your thought process. Think back to what you learned in elementary school. You'll find that twitter does not have to be the foundation of your worldview.
are you a woman or why are you so passive aggressive?
gay
it's kino
the movie had some good creepy moments. it would have been much more interesting if it leaned more into the folk horror and just been subtle about some of the themes