>Michael Waldron
Literally who? Is he the Rick N Morty gay?
Why are they even making Kang Dynasty still if the audience has completely rejected the character?
Ant-Man is on Rudd, he's failed to sell the character through an entire trilogy.
5 months ago
Anonymous
How can it be on him when he was barely in the movie? It was all about Kang and Janet.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nah, people like the actor/character since the first movie and he's always a highlight in the Avengers movies. Problem is that the first movie was Wright's baby and Marvel used the remains to do a decent origin story, but after that they had no clear idea what to do next, the second film is really just 'Ant-Man 1 but worse and with even lower stakes' and the third is just a mess of way too many ideas where the titular protagonist just goes along for the ride in a generic adventure
Loki was good and he was brought on to MoM with Raimi to salvage it, which was somewhat successful. The movie was messy but not terrible; most of the problems come from things they were stuck with like evil Wanda and America Chavez being central to the plot.
"Writing" doesn't mean much for these types of movies that have a dozen producers giving notes and are reshot and edited based on the approval of test audiences.
>Michael Waldron
Literally who? Is he the Rick N Morty gay?
Why are they even making Kang Dynasty still if the audience has completely rejected the character?
>the audience has completely rejected the character
They haven't, though.
>Ant Man Quantumania
They memed about him jobbing to ants, but his performance in that and Loki S2, which came afterwards, was still praised.
>his performance in that
were the prerelease critics praising him shown a different version of the film?
Ant-Man is on Rudd, he's failed to sell the character through an entire trilogy.
How can it be on him when he was barely in the movie? It was all about Kang and Janet.
Nah, people like the actor/character since the first movie and he's always a highlight in the Avengers movies. Problem is that the first movie was Wright's baby and Marvel used the remains to do a decent origin story, but after that they had no clear idea what to do next, the second film is really just 'Ant-Man 1 but worse and with even lower stakes' and the third is just a mess of way too many ideas where the titular protagonist just goes along for the ride in a generic adventure
>was still praised.
No, because absolutely no one watched it but people who are already obsessed with the MCU and would praise the Marvels.
He's a different Rick and Morty gay who's replacing the previous one (Jeff Loveness)
He wrote Loki S1 and Multiverse of Madness.
And they're giving him both Avengers movies? The MCU is finished.
>Wrote the most popular Disney+ show
>Wrote the second biggest post-Endgame movie
Absolutely baffling why they're keeping him.
Loki was good and he was brought on to MoM with Raimi to salvage it, which was somewhat successful. The movie was messy but not terrible; most of the problems come from things they were stuck with like evil Wanda and America Chavez being central to the plot.
Evil Wanda was his and Raimi's idea, though.
No, that was Feige’s idea from way back. Raimi and Waldron decided to make Wanda bad from the start instead of having her crack midway through.
I'm probably one of Cinemaphile's biggest MoM enjoyers, so this is fine by me.
Imagine being a Hollywood scriptwriter and being forced to write capeshit.
"Writing" doesn't mean much for these types of movies that have a dozen producers giving notes and are reshot and edited based on the approval of test audiences.