The hypnotist part pissed me off. How was that not fricking magic? If the movie is found footage, why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real? Was it being ironic on purpose? Probably. But it still pissed me off.
>why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real?
I guess we're supposed to also be hypnotized [since we are part of the hypnotized tv audience].
wtf was that ending? its a documentary style film but somehow we can see the delusions being experienced in the mind of the main character? moronic.
>No hypnotist alive can pull something like that off lol >Dude was a wizard he was just moronic about it
The Demon was already fricking with stuff before that -- making the girl fly, making the medium guy puke black shit and die, etc. So it stands to reason the demon would have fricked with the perception of reality in that moment to make the hypnotism super realistic.
A 90% chance of seeing it but if you try to rewind the scene its normal.
This is possible with streaming services so why don't they take advantage of it?
>If the movie is found footage, why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real?
because we were hypnotized too, duh. It's the dumbest shit i ever saw in a movie
Presumably to demonstrate that the stuff happening on screen is transferring to IRL.
This is how it's progenitor, Ghostwatch was structured. The ghost guy started jumping through the EM spectrum signals back to the studio then, by implication, into the homes of the viewers.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0200659
The way her head is splitting like that is esoteric symbolism (known as "Heart Break" or "Severance") for "releasing spores". The idea is that whatever was in her has now transferred to you. You have been "seeded". An idea, probably one that is unhealthy for you, has now taken root somewhere in your unconscious.
>why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real?
I guess we're supposed to also be hypnotized [since we are part of the hypnotized tv audience].
[...]
That's a bigger issue.
Actually what was moronic was that it was presented as a documentary style film but it had no ending. What was the aftermath of the fateful episode? This question was never answered by the documentary. That's what pissed me off.
Obviously the directors avoided that because whatever they came up with would be lame. But DON'T FRAME IT AS A DOCUMENTARY if you won't provide the ending. Just do the typical WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE IS REAL AND HAPPENED AS A LIVE TV EVENT. IT IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY DOCUMENTED INSTANCES OF PARANORMAL ACTIVITY.
It's a Found Footage Documentary Style movie that is either afraid to commit to what it is or completely forgot it's own vision once the budget kicked in, there's a surprising amount of those out there despite the genre being piss simple to make
I'll give it this, the scares were good, the scenes with the Ghost Wife were the best parts
The hypnotist part pissed me off. How was that not fricking magic? If the movie is found footage, why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real? Was it being ironic on purpose? Probably. But it still pissed me off.
The entire thing was bullshit from the start. The entire show was a hallucination. The little girl was innocent. The guy sacrificed his wife for ratings, this episode was just the devil coming for what was due. He went crazy on air and killed everyone. That's it.
Unless we're assuming he somehow snapped Gus' neck 180 degrees and set the other guest on fire something else was in play, even if it was 'just' hypnosis.
It's stupid. They should've just made a normal movie if they didn't want to commit to the FF style. It probably would've helped the movie too because then you could have actual spooks in the first half without breaking suspension of disbelief.
The viewers (including us, the viewers of the supposed documentary which is essentially the movie) got hypnotized and snapped out of it in the last scene after the presenter kills the girl.
I haven't. I'm not a big fan of horror movies, I watched this because of the main actor. I liked him on Prisoners and I thought I should give it a try. One movie that really shook me was Jacob's Ladder, watched it when I was about 14 years old.
The stutter effect at 0:02 and 0:03 is so jarringly fake it makes me aware that I'm obviously watching something produced today desperately trying to appear like it's from 50 years ago. Professional cameras didn't do anything like that in the 1970s.
It was used not because they thought it was a normal thing to do, but to add a supernatural element. This is a seemingly normal girl but it sets off some unexplained response when she walks into a room.
all these found footage movies are made by people that do not understand how film artifacts or digital artifacts form, or the aesthetics/characteristics of said artifacts
it's all AfterFX plugins used by zoomers
The stutter effect at 0:02 and 0:03 is so jarringly fake it makes me aware that I'm obviously watching something produced today desperately trying to appear like it's from 50 years ago. Professional cameras didn't do anything like that in the 1970s.
>stutter effect
It looks like it's intended to resemble film being pulled vertically and skipping. Which makes no sense since a live show would be on video.
not sure why pedos keep saying that like it's relevant
we're not in a muslim country, and even if we were marriage =/= consumation
there were plenty of nobles who married girls who were basically kids and underage but didn't have sex with them till they were full-fledged adults, it's strictly politics
1 month ago
Anonymous
The sarcasm in my post really flew over your head.
This was a peak comfy movie all the way till the end. I don't have any suggestions for how it could be enhanced, but I was left unsatisfied with what they have. Up until the last 20 minutes it really was extremely well done and reinforced my faith in movies tho.
>“Comfy” is what people call things they know are bad but enjoy anyway
You sound like you use snark as a coping mechanism for your own lack of human interaction.
wtf was that ending? its a documentary style film but somehow we can see the delusions being experienced in the mind of the main character? moronic.
They should have removed the whole meta-hypnotism shtick and instead focused much more heavily on just having an authentic late night show ending with cheering and trumpets. Then have the real kicker ending (with the electricity etc) only come off stage or in the green room or something
No because the devil knows that YOU you sick frick would enjoy seeing a cute teenage girl naked, he knows that would bring joy to you. And he knows he's already getting your soul anyway so he has no incentive to bring any more happiness to your life here on earth, that's the opposite of what satans do
No because the devil knows that YOU you sick frick would enjoy seeing a cute teenage girl naked, he knows that would bring joy to you. And he knows he's already getting your soul anyway so he has no incentive to bring any more happiness to your life here on earth, that's the opposite of what satans do
but maybe it would make a whole new generation of e-girl enjoyers
the devil plays 4d chess
So was the girl ever really there, or was it just the demon all along? Was the demon possessing her from the very start, or did it just fake leaving her body after it was summoned so they'd take the restraints off?
She was absolutely possessed dude, all of the bodies were killed in the same way the demon did in the same places, there's no way he could have done that without supernatural powers
yes, he was the one actually doing that. The one who was cursed by a demon was him, not the girl. He did a ritual that sacrificed his wife at the grove. He was the actual cause of all the supernatural stuff
I watched this at 2 am the other night after taking 3 benadryl in an attempt to help my insomnia, but still couldn't sleep. So I watched this and it was rainy and quiet outside and I kept thinking someone was in the room with me. Despite all of this, that shit still sucked.
It pretends to be a found footage but it’s not. It made vhs look like a masterpiece in comparison.
It felt so cheap.
It sucks because the idea wasn’t that bad and at some point in the movie it got my curiosity. Everything felt rushed.
I don't know what is it about horror movies nowadays, it's always a mix of very creative stuff, and then awful trite nonsense that spoils it.
This movie is just full of contrasts like that.
+cool split head demon e-girl/sneakily editing in a male to play the possessed version
- boring exorcist/evil dead ripoff lines
+movie actually goes somewhere weird
-but then reels it back into the cliche "oh no the demon made it look like the host killed everyone and that it's explainable without the supernatural, but you the audience knows wink wink"
+fun cast of different characters
-dude dying wife lmao please be emotionally involved in the plot man please man cmon man it's a bald woman you gotta be sad about that
good film. ending was a bit over the top and it would have been fine as just a demon on a talk show that kills everyone the end. like end the film where he walks backstage and then its credits. it would have been fine. would totally recommend to anyone who hasn't seen it. better than dunc 2 for sure.
>better than dunc 2
tbh you've set the bar a bit low
DUNC would have been much much better if they hadn't cast a twink for their protagonist and a monkey for his love interest.
This guy 100% was an actual sorcerer/devil worshipper right? He was just making up bullshit scientific explanations and adopting a persona to cover up his supernatural connections.
Yeah. That's what I was confused about, too. Why go into bullshit about debunking when you are actually in the thick of it? Was he just gatekeeping normies from discovering too much?
I know that, i just mean his character.
Also btw the real guy was absolutely full of shit, he'd constantly refuse people's challenges, refuse to pay people who passed his criteria, didn't properly test people, let people peer review, keep track of data, etc, total fricking scumbag.
>What the FRICK was his problem?
Was desperately trying to get in on the orgies between the tall trees and failing, then tried to pledge allegiance to the demon only to be incinerated.
This guy 100% was an actual sorcerer/devil worshipper right? He was just making up bullshit scientific explanations and adopting a persona to cover up his supernatural connections.
>What the FRICK was his problem?
Was desperately trying to get in on the orgies between the tall trees and failing, then tried to pledge allegiance to the demon only to be incinerated.
none, he actually provided a great performance, great voice and cheesy as required but at the same time serious
did no one else instantly think that he was Anton LaVey in disguise when he was first introduced? made me think he was even more when he tried to beg the split-head demon to be its follower.
Me and my wife and my girlfriend watched this five times in a row at our local theatre in capital city, USA. Great movies sirs thank you beautiful white girls thank you please come again
Didn't anyone else notice the hypnotist worm scene, guy said something along the lines of "it went too far?!?!" I think his appearence was misleadimg and that the demon enhanced his hypnotism.
One thing I didn't like was how the hypnotist started to praise Beelzebub as soon as the Jebus and some other diety didn't work. Good job, bro. Way to let the fedora fall off that easily.
Was it ever meant to be a secret that he made a pact with a demon for fame at the grove club and used his wife as a sacrifice because I guessed that in the first 5 min of the exposition
yeah that too, they should have revealed that slowly, like maybe have a guest accuse him of being in the grove, and reveal the wife actually died of cancer through the movie, instead of literally >oh btw he joined a satanic club, and after his mysterious rise to fame his wife died mysteriously
in the first 5 minutes, moronic shit
overall good movie, no diversity trash alone makes it worth watching
was already spooked when Christou was being exacerbated by Minnie trying to warn Jack and everyone at the studio
it was cool most of the shots where Lilly was staring directly at the film's camera view (us the viewer, or the person playing the found footage, not the talk show's multiple camera angles)
i did not really like the cgi split head scene, changed the pace of the film entirely and was pretty stupid.
i didn't mind the ending. did people become annoyed when the movie/demon was trying to reach out to the viewer (us) multiple times in the last act?
in the beginning it was established that Jack was already dabbing in satanic rituals at the grove but not explained why until the end; and i guess Jack also did not know the full price he had to sacrifice giving his soul to the demon in exchange for ratings until the end.
also multiple anons have pointed out more and more subtleties/nuanced throughout the film that wasn't obvious. not like i'm going to watch it again because i'm a pussy.
interesting film in all. not a horror-buff by all means because i'm legitimately terrified. irrelevant but the last actual horror movie i watched was Noroi i think 10 years ago. both of which made me feel uneasy.
are people trolling/memeing or something why are there so many people triggered with the title cards. i didn't even know they were AI generated in the first place.
that being said since they were AI generated it could tie-in to the meta aspect of the demons manifesting itself through technology/electricity or whatever.
the wife. she appears a billion times throughout the movie. even when looking back on the tape, its not some demon looking back, its the wife. the wife is angry that the husband wanted to sacrifice his wife, unknowingly or not. she is pissed and the entire time its a story about her revenge.
wtf was that ending? its a documentary style film but somehow we can see the delusions being experienced in the mind of the main character? moronic.
The hypnotist part pissed me off. How was that not fricking magic? If the movie is found footage, why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real? Was it being ironic on purpose? Probably. But it still pissed me off.
>why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real?
I guess we're supposed to also be hypnotized [since we are part of the hypnotized tv audience].
That's a bigger issue.
No hypnotist alive can pull something like that off lol
Dude was a wizard he was just moronic about it
>No hypnotist alive can pull something like that off lol
>Dude was a wizard he was just moronic about it
The Demon was already fricking with stuff before that -- making the girl fly, making the medium guy puke black shit and die, etc. So it stands to reason the demon would have fricked with the perception of reality in that moment to make the hypnotism super realistic.
NTA but I like to think the Hypnotist was a Wizard who firmly disbelieved in the Occult and other shit. Makes him funnier
would’ve been kino if the movie has a 10% chance of playing a version of that scene without the worms
A 90% chance of seeing it but if you try to rewind the scene its normal.
This is possible with streaming services so why don't they take advantage of it?
kino idea
You count as part of the hypnotized audience, since it's found footage. moronic movie nonetheless. Shouldn't be as discussed as it is here.
They're obviously sliding all the Fallout threads
It was fun and had zero feminist preaching. In the current year that is a lot. The lead actor also did a great job.
>If the movie is found footage, why do we see the worms when they’re not supposed to be real?
because we were hypnotized too, duh. It's the dumbest shit i ever saw in a movie
Presumably to demonstrate that the stuff happening on screen is transferring to IRL.
This is how it's progenitor, Ghostwatch was structured. The ghost guy started jumping through the EM spectrum signals back to the studio then, by implication, into the homes of the viewers.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0200659
The way her head is splitting like that is esoteric symbolism (known as "Heart Break" or "Severance") for "releasing spores". The idea is that whatever was in her has now transferred to you. You have been "seeded". An idea, probably one that is unhealthy for you, has now taken root somewhere in your unconscious.
>If the movie is found footage
Did you skip over the black and white off-camera parts or what?
The Devil liked how the dude hipnotized the bald guy and did the same with us and Jack
This
All my this
OP is a mong!
WTF did I say?
Actually what was moronic was that it was presented as a documentary style film but it had no ending. What was the aftermath of the fateful episode? This question was never answered by the documentary. That's what pissed me off.
Obviously the directors avoided that because whatever they came up with would be lame. But DON'T FRAME IT AS A DOCUMENTARY if you won't provide the ending. Just do the typical WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE IS REAL AND HAPPENED AS A LIVE TV EVENT. IT IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY DOCUMENTED INSTANCES OF PARANORMAL ACTIVITY.
anon you should go see Civil War you'll absolutely LOVE it.
It's a Found Footage Documentary Style movie that is either afraid to commit to what it is or completely forgot it's own vision once the budget kicked in, there's a surprising amount of those out there despite the genre being piss simple to make
I'll give it this, the scares were good, the scenes with the Ghost Wife were the best parts
Pay attention the film. You were still under the spell of the hypnotist.
The entire thing was bullshit from the start. The entire show was a hallucination. The little girl was innocent. The guy sacrificed his wife for ratings, this episode was just the devil coming for what was due. He went crazy on air and killed everyone. That's it.
Unless we're assuming he somehow snapped Gus' neck 180 degrees and set the other guest on fire something else was in play, even if it was 'just' hypnosis.
It's stupid. They should've just made a normal movie if they didn't want to commit to the FF style. It probably would've helped the movie too because then you could have actual spooks in the first half without breaking suspension of disbelief.
The viewers (including us, the viewers of the supposed documentary which is essentially the movie) got hypnotized and snapped out of it in the last scene after the presenter kills the girl.
>gimmick movie ends with a gimmick last act
stupid
You (we) were hypnotised too
Spookiest scene I ever did see
Frick yes m8. Gotta give the movie at least that.
btw I've witnessed an actual exorcism. Fricking brutal.
Have you ever seen Terrifier? It's probably even spookier now that I think about it.
I haven't. I'm not a big fan of horror movies, I watched this because of the main actor. I liked him on Prisoners and I thought I should give it a try. One movie that really shook me was Jacob's Ladder, watched it when I was about 14 years old.
Upvoted. Hella bone-chilling, broh.
if ever there was a meme movie that was taylor-made for reddit, it's this trash
The movie is good. The girl is hot
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh my dick pls nooooooooo
The stutter effect at 0:02 and 0:03 is so jarringly fake it makes me aware that I'm obviously watching something produced today desperately trying to appear like it's from 50 years ago. Professional cameras didn't do anything like that in the 1970s.
It was used not because they thought it was a normal thing to do, but to add a supernatural element. This is a seemingly normal girl but it sets off some unexplained response when she walks into a room.
all these found footage movies are made by people that do not understand how film artifacts or digital artifacts form, or the aesthetics/characteristics of said artifacts
it's all AfterFX plugins used by zoomers
can you tell me how they do work? i wanna learn even at the cost that it might ruin found footage for me
it's obviously a static from a demon
This is correct, we do that
sorry I meant THEY. They do that
Hiya. Another anon, a normal human being just like you and me.
>stutter effect
It looks like it's intended to resemble film being pulled vertically and skipping. Which makes no sense since a live show would be on video.
Old enough for kisses
How old is she IRL? I watched it and sometimes she looked 12 and others, she looked 20.
14
That's halal. Aisha was 9.
not sure why pedos keep saying that like it's relevant
we're not in a muslim country, and even if we were marriage =/= consumation
there were plenty of nobles who married girls who were basically kids and underage but didn't have sex with them till they were full-fledged adults, it's strictly politics
The sarcasm in my post really flew over your head.
SEXO
i bet anons would put their massive penises inside that flower
This was a peak comfy movie all the way till the end. I don't have any suggestions for how it could be enhanced, but I was left unsatisfied with what they have. Up until the last 20 minutes it really was extremely well done and reinforced my faith in movies tho.
“Comfy” is what people call things they know are bad but enjoy anyway
It was a solid 6/10
Horror and comedy are not easy to pull off
Suggest your 7+/10
>“Comfy” is what people call things they know are bad but enjoy anyway
You sound like you use snark as a coping mechanism for your own lack of human interaction.
The point of a movie is to be enjoyed. If you enjoy it its not bad
this.
is a homo
They should have removed the whole meta-hypnotism shtick and instead focused much more heavily on just having an authentic late night show ending with cheering and trumpets. Then have the real kicker ending (with the electricity etc) only come off stage or in the green room or something
Mr. Sparkling Wriggles to you.
lilly was kino
She should've gotten naked. That's exactly what the devil would do. It would be truly shocking.
No because the devil knows that YOU you sick frick would enjoy seeing a cute teenage girl naked, he knows that would bring joy to you. And he knows he's already getting your soul anyway so he has no incentive to bring any more happiness to your life here on earth, that's the opposite of what satans do
Actor is over 18. I don't care.
Phew thats a relief, I thought I was starting to understand pedos for a sec.
I looked that shit up in the theater
Did you?
The movie was shot back in 2022 and was realised in March 2023, so she was underage during the filming.
>That's exactly what the devil would do
and that's what no one did
it was never lilly was it
would
>i'm gonna suck your dick cuz i'm evil!
WAO!!!
Uuuuuuoooohhhh
her voice is really nice
The girl looks like Liev Schreiber's girlson
dammit anon i feel bad for chuckling at this
but maybe it would make a whole new generation of e-girl enjoyers
the devil plays 4d chess
I thought it was Mr. Wiggles.
QRD?
So was the girl ever really there, or was it just the demon all along? Was the demon possessing her from the very start, or did it just fake leaving her body after it was summoned so they'd take the restraints off?
demon all along, it was never her other than a vessel
the girl was just some innocent girl who was used by the cult. He just went crazy and stabbed her.
She was absolutely possessed dude, all of the bodies were killed in the same way the demon did in the same places, there's no way he could have done that without supernatural powers
yes, he was the one actually doing that. The one who was cursed by a demon was him, not the girl. He did a ritual that sacrificed his wife at the grove. He was the actual cause of all the supernatural stuff
I watched this at 2 am the other night after taking 3 benadryl in an attempt to help my insomnia, but still couldn't sleep. So I watched this and it was rainy and quiet outside and I kept thinking someone was in the room with me. Despite all of this, that shit still sucked.
I liked it, but it was way too easy to convince the doctor lady to let them do the thing.
She didnt knew the demon was Jack's friend lol
she was on national TV.
she wanted his D and wanted to impress him
haha Doc should have shown her boobers then
>Not watching it on your old tube TV
NGL it enhanced the experience
It pretends to be a found footage but it’s not. It made vhs look like a masterpiece in comparison.
It felt so cheap.
It sucks because the idea wasn’t that bad and at some point in the movie it got my curiosity. Everything felt rushed.
I don't know what is it about horror movies nowadays, it's always a mix of very creative stuff, and then awful trite nonsense that spoils it.
This movie is just full of contrasts like that.
+cool split head demon e-girl/sneakily editing in a male to play the possessed version
- boring exorcist/evil dead ripoff lines
+movie actually goes somewhere weird
-but then reels it back into the cliche "oh no the demon made it look like the host killed everyone and that it's explainable without the supernatural, but you the audience knows wink wink"
+fun cast of different characters
-dude dying wife lmao please be emotionally involved in the plot man please man cmon man it's a bald woman you gotta be sad about that
based australians , they do really know how to amp up a flick into kino
tbh I loved that design
Abso-fricking-lutely
>9 fricking production company idents in opening credits
Had me laughing before the film had begun
It's a sign of quality!
Literally vid related
gays like you need to die
kek
your movie sucks so bad you had to get like 10 money laundering operations involved to even get it distributed
Money laundering.
>see thread
>go look up movie
>watch it
>first 2/3 is great
>last 1/3 is fricking awful
fricking blue balled as always
another movie turns into cgi shitshow after a slow buildup, why the frick
good film. ending was a bit over the top and it would have been fine as just a demon on a talk show that kills everyone the end. like end the film where he walks backstage and then its credits. it would have been fine. would totally recommend to anyone who hasn't seen it. better than dunc 2 for sure.
>better than dunc 2
tbh you've set the bar a bit low
DUNC would have been much much better if they hadn't cast a twink for their protagonist and a monkey for his love interest.
pretty gay reason to not like an over long uninteresting movie about space politics thats all style and no substance.
>hadn't cast a twink
He's playing a 15 year old
chalamet is twice that age
why not cast an actual 15yo with a somewhat normal physique? why cast a 30yo twink?
What the FRICK was his problem?
Neo. Bane in the real world
This guy 100% was an actual sorcerer/devil worshipper right? He was just making up bullshit scientific explanations and adopting a persona to cover up his supernatural connections.
Yeah. That's what I was confused about, too. Why go into bullshit about debunking when you are actually in the thick of it? Was he just gatekeeping normies from discovering too much?
He was based on a real ex-magician who became a debunker gay.
I know that, i just mean his character.
Also btw the real guy was absolutely full of shit, he'd constantly refuse people's challenges, refuse to pay people who passed his criteria, didn't properly test people, let people peer review, keep track of data, etc, total fricking scumbag.
He's a bigger buzzkill than Buzz Killington
>What the FRICK was his problem?
Was desperately trying to get in on the orgies between the tall trees and failing, then tried to pledge allegiance to the demon only to be incinerated.
none, he actually provided a great performance, great voice and cheesy as required but at the same time serious
did no one else instantly think that he was Anton LaVey in disguise when he was first introduced? made me think he was even more when he tried to beg the split-head demon to be its follower.
Nah, the guy running the cult that got Waco'd was LaVey. I just assumed skeptic dude was James Randi.
Me and my wife and my girlfriend watched this five times in a row at our local theatre in capital city, USA. Great movies sirs thank you beautiful white girls thank you please come again
Didn't anyone else notice the hypnotist worm scene, guy said something along the lines of "it went too far?!?!" I think his appearence was misleadimg and that the demon enhanced his hypnotism.
>that shot of the audience noping immediately after the girl's head splits
kek
One thing I didn't like was how the hypnotist started to praise Beelzebub as soon as the Jebus and some other diety didn't work. Good job, bro. Way to let the fedora fall off that easily.
You mean the guy who refused to honor his promise to pay for proof of the supernatural, has no integrity?!
>The movie ends freezing on Jack standing amidst the bodies turning into the logo for Dreamer Awake Studios
I watched the entire movie in like 10 minutes.
It was alright. Not scary enough in my opinion.
i feel like it jumped the gun way too soon, first 80% of the movie is great, the ending is extremely dissapointing
Was it ever meant to be a secret that he made a pact with a demon for fame at the grove club and used his wife as a sacrifice because I guessed that in the first 5 min of the exposition
yeah that too, they should have revealed that slowly, like maybe have a guest accuse him of being in the grove, and reveal the wife actually died of cancer through the movie, instead of literally
>oh btw he joined a satanic club, and after his mysterious rise to fame his wife died mysteriously
in the first 5 minutes, moronic shit
overall good movie, no diversity trash alone makes it worth watching
I liked the movie
Me too.
was already spooked when Christou was being exacerbated by Minnie trying to warn Jack and everyone at the studio
it was cool most of the shots where Lilly was staring directly at the film's camera view (us the viewer, or the person playing the found footage, not the talk show's multiple camera angles)
i did not really like the cgi split head scene, changed the pace of the film entirely and was pretty stupid.
i didn't mind the ending. did people become annoyed when the movie/demon was trying to reach out to the viewer (us) multiple times in the last act?
in the beginning it was established that Jack was already dabbing in satanic rituals at the grove but not explained why until the end; and i guess Jack also did not know the full price he had to sacrifice giving his soul to the demon in exchange for ratings until the end.
also multiple anons have pointed out more and more subtleties/nuanced throughout the film that wasn't obvious. not like i'm going to watch it again because i'm a pussy.
interesting film in all. not a horror-buff by all means because i'm legitimately terrified. irrelevant but the last actual horror movie i watched was Noroi i think 10 years ago. both of which made me feel uneasy.
>Quality production
>Went great lengths to make it period authentic
>Use lazy AI slop for title cards
What were they thinking?
The Arab money ran out.
Didn't even notice when watching, dgaf
>things only weenies care about
>tags: intense eye contact
I will remember the fact you lemmings will fawn over something so despairingly mid the next time I take Cinemaphiles opinion seriously
>mid
no one cares what you think, Black person zoomer. go back to tiktok or your friend simulator.
ong?
are people trolling/memeing or something why are there so many people triggered with the title cards. i didn't even know they were AI generated in the first place.
that being said since they were AI generated it could tie-in to the meta aspect of the demons manifesting itself through technology/electricity or whatever.
say no to AI, bros. you'll kill everyone.
easily one of the worst horror movies in the last couple years, a real snore
the wife. she appears a billion times throughout the movie. even when looking back on the tape, its not some demon looking back, its the wife. the wife is angry that the husband wanted to sacrifice his wife, unknowingly or not. she is pissed and the entire time its a story about her revenge.
based take
you a poopie head or smtng
>based take
not mine, saw some dude post about it in reddit, and honestly im convinced. makes a whole lot of sense too.