Humanity Frick Yeah has always been cringe. It has never been "humanity" that possessed those traits, it was always and only western man, and only the western man of the pre-great war world. Everything after 1918 has been a mistake.
It's funny how you can tell something is pozzed just from the subcontext of the poster. Just try to locate the White man. Deliberately relegated to the back corner mostly out of sight, while an interracial couple is front and center. The black man is a doctor with a lab coat, showing that blacks are smart and capable. And the centerpiece is a strong, powerful mulatta woman.
What emotion is this cover supposed to evoke? Half the people on here look really happy and jubilant, while the other half look like they just want to kill someone.
Amerimutts advocate for cutting off your balls and penis these days. In contrast to that Aztecs were definitely a more advanced civilization by your standard.
Human sacrifice isn't necessarily le bad. Not much difference between executing your captured enemies via firing squad vs. cutting their hearts out at the temple. The issue of course is that this progressed to needing so many sacrifices the empire had to enslave their neighbors and take a blood tax from their subjects, which was ultimately their downfall because everyone was obviously angry that the sun priests stole their family members to sacrifice, which is of course fricked up. But just sacrificing captive enemies isn't that bad to me.
Yeah, Quaritch takes matters into his own hands and personally shoots at the traitors fleeing the compound. Augustine (aka science b***h) gets mortally injured in the crossfire.
I think Stephen Lang's performance gave the character some subtleties that evoke the spirit of OP's image, but on paper I do agree, the character wouldn't say that
They're basically people. Giant blue people with USB connections on their heads. Other than that there's no functional difference. I mean, they're better than Black folk at least and Black folk are supposedly human.
Contract malaria'vi from contaminated water on Pandora. Die in your own diarrhea, because the Tree Deity was on vacation that month and the prayer and sacrificial fruit basket didn't work out.
Why are you pretending that Earth problems exist on Pandora?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>sickness and death don't exist
It's almost as if it's a fantasy made by and made for mental children. >film about how great nature is is 100% made in computers
I get it now.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It's almost as if it's a fantasy
Exactly, so your point about "muh disease" doesn't stand.
3 months ago
Anonymous
What's the point of comparing something to this world, if it's not feasible in any shape or form?
3 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not comparing to this world.
I'm comparing the fictional version of Earth as it is depicted in Avatar, and Pandora, another fictional world in the same setting.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yep, anon "ZOG" was clearly a thing in Avatar. Clearly, it was a movie about JQ cleverly disguised as a "manifest destiny" critique by master manipulator and future Führer Cameron.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah, it's a fictional world where the rules work differently.
This was one of the problems with the humans in the film. They couldn't differentiate the navi from human savages.
Like they thought their spirit tree was religious mumbo jumbo but it was actually legit.
The scientist lady tried to explain this to them, but they didn't listen.
Anyone getting too caught up in the native american metaphor of the film is falling into the same trap.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's a neat idea, granted. But that's way too smart for Mr. "But who lays the eggs." Cameron. The movie was clearly about what you've identified it to be.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>scientist speaking truth to power is such a used up cliche
Because humans would never contaminate the water supply and die from lack of healthcare...
At least the navi get to upload themselves to tree heaven if it happens.
And illness won't spread as fast in their population because they're not overpopulated.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Did you know that hunters and gatherers only lived until age 50? What'd you think they died off? Did you know that sickness - such rabies - and a potpourri of parasites - such as tapeworms - are widely contracted by wildlife? It's not exclusive to humans and civilizations. In fact, I'd make a better case arguing the contrary.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Lifespan: Around 30% longer than humans (roughly 160-180 years)
What would You name a newly found room temp superconductor special metal? Floatyrockium? Unobtainium is a real term used right this moment all over science and engineering field for fictional materials that have special properties.
Give it a Latin or Greek name so that I don't sound like a toddler, when referring to it. >all over science
And this means what? Academia is adult-daycare. So fitting, I guess.
No, "unobtanium" is a moniker used in engineering for materials that are needed for concept to work, but don't exist in real life.
The key point is that the material DOES NOT EXIST.
In the Avatar universe, the superconductor definitely exists, so it would either be named after the discoverer, or they would have the privilege of naming it themselves.
And it would not be called unobtanium.
Quit trying to window dress lazy writing.
Based anons being redpilled about space israelites. I can't believe people here spent 15 years bootlicking a zog bot giving his life to genocide an entire planet for more consooming back on earth.
Reminder that environmentalism is a white man's ideal.
Reminder that white people predominantly live in the country and practice real environmentalism by raising and planting their own food.
Reminder the na'vi are trad.
Reminder that white people were the primary audience that really connected with it because their ancestral blood memories were awakened. >nooo don't go live in nature and repeatedly impregnate your virgin huntress queen wife and have 6 children and eat fruits straight from trees you have to work 80 hours a week to eat bugs and breathe smog
What does the average person achieve? The average goy stands at a register or sits in a chair staring at a screen for 8 hours a day, barely making ends meet paying rent for property he does not own, and that's his life. It's only really good for the elites who have more human cattle slaves than would be possible in an agrarian society. For the vast majority of people, they'd be better off living in a natural environment with low population, plenty of space and plenty of unpolluted resources. For someone like Bezos, this would be an utter nightmare because he'd have 1/1000000 the human cattle to exploit and be far less wealthy.
Living in the woods is boring. The suffering that civilization causes is a price that is worth paying, even if the project is going to fail. Both success and great tragedy are outcomes that I would welcome, because they're exciting.
Civilization doesn't necessitate excessive industrialization, though it is of course the natural outcome unless it's deliberately stopped. For instance, you can have a community of self-sufficient subsistence farmers. That's civilization. You don't need to frack up huge swathes of land and dump factory runoff into the rivers, poisoning every fricking thing around until your actual blood is toxic. There are levels to this.
achieve what? and towards what end? The best answers I get to this is medicine and comfort and excess. But again to what end? a surplus in resources will just create a population boom and an increasing need for recourses in a vicious cycle. Just throwing out the word "achieve" doesn't invalidate that way of life, especially because (being romanticized as frick as noble savages by the white liberal homosexual cameron) they have a living tree goddess who they chose to stay with even after coming to contact with human technology. A simple life is enough, no need to min max. Again, people were so drawn to that world for a reason, they crave that.
[...]
exactly
achieve what? and towards what end? The best answers I get to this is medicine and comfort and excess. But again to what end? a surplus in resources will just create a population boom and an increasing need for recourses in a vicious cycle. Just throwing out the word "achieve" doesn't invalidate that way of life, especially because (being romanticized as frick as noble savages by the white liberal homosexual cameron) they have a living tree goddess who they chose to stay with even after coming to contact with human technology. A simple life is enough, no need to min max. Again, people were so drawn to that world for a reason, they crave that.
Civilization doesn't necessitate excessive industrialization, though it is of course the natural outcome unless it's deliberately stopped. For instance, you can have a community of self-sufficient subsistence farmers. That's civilization. You don't need to frack up huge swathes of land and dump factory runoff into the rivers, poisoning every fricking thing around until your actual blood is toxic. There are levels to this.
>make the most braindead, clichéed morally white and black movie you could ever produce >/pol/tards make it their mission to show everyone they side with the cartoonishly over the top bad guy because no one will ever touch their dick
>thing is cartoonishly over the top evil because gvmt and cooperate rats told me so
Give me on rational [!] reason why humans slaying na'vi is bad, but a lion slaying a zebra isn't.
Company needs to make a profit so that econ numbers go up so that bills can be paid and people can afford electricity and running water for the most basic needs. Same thing. Next try.
Where's the innocence here? The Na'vi win and people on earth die. The humans win and the Na'vi die. There is no innocence here. It's eat or get eaten.
3 months ago
Anonymous
The navi are defending themselves from an invasion. It's not their fault the humans fricked themselves up.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Tell me why is the "invasion" of the humans evil, but when a bug comes into the territory of another bug and replaces him it's not?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Bad analogy. Humans aren't bugs.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Substitute it for a mammal, you diva. Also: >Humans are animals.
3 months ago
Anonymous
how does evacuating earth force humans to go around burning tribal villages and hunting fully sentient talking whales for their brain fluid
3 months ago
Anonymous
>no profit >company has to lay off personell >down at the production chain, people are gonna get thrown onto the streets >forced to do crime, do drugs out of desperation >die
You get the picture?
3 months ago
Anonymous
why did humanity put itself in that predicament in the first place?
3 months ago
Anonymous
They didn't? Do you seriously think, humans are in control of the development of their species. Are you 4 years old?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>you can't oppose bad things because someone relies on them
somehow civilization didn't collapse before we started to suck out whale brains
3 months ago
Anonymous
Maybe in your head canon. Have schools not briefed you on the fall of [insert any ancient empire] and its deadly ramifications?
Well, you can oppose it. But what's the moral difference, if you kill off a Na'vi directly or a human indirectly?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>what do you mean holocaust is bad? think of the people that will lose their jobs if we don't buy all this poison gas
you are deranged
3 months ago
Anonymous
Na'vi massacre was economical, 'caust was political going back to the derangement of a handful of men. >derangement caused by WWI and failure of Weimar republic, both were economical
Human civilization was unsustainable. Which is why they destroyed their own planet and started destroying another.
The Na'Vi have super convenient biology that lets them live sustainable fulfilling lives without the need for technology.
If they want to fly they can plug themselves into a big bat. If they want lights they just pick up some bio-luminescent plant. If they're dying they download themselves into a tree.
Humanity will probably burn itself out in space while the Na'Vi are still living happily.
I can't wait for the HFYHispanic meltdown when they reveal in the last movie that na'vi are eldar or some shit, and Pandora is some sort of garden world their space-faring ancestors made
does it? the same chvds who want to send another 300k to get mauled on the bug planet are also demanding a genocide of blue cat people because they are blue
he never said that
>he never said that
>posts a soijack
>accuses someone else of being reddit
>me, when the Black folk get uppity and demand reparations
Humanity Frick Yeah has always been cringe. It has never been "humanity" that possessed those traits, it was always and only western man, and only the western man of the pre-great war world. Everything after 1918 has been a mistake.
>t. misanthropic furry
BASED
We're all the h*cking same! We're just BASED and VALID h*cking HUMANS!
HUMANITY FRICK YEAH
It's funny how you can tell something is pozzed just from the subcontext of the poster. Just try to locate the White man. Deliberately relegated to the back corner mostly out of sight, while an interracial couple is front and center. The black man is a doctor with a lab coat, showing that blacks are smart and capable. And the centerpiece is a strong, powerful mulatta woman.
made by the french, of course it's leftist drivel
But blacks are smart and capable.
if it's ok to feel pride in your own group is it really bad to feel pride in your own species?
because said group is the only redeeming factor of the species.
What emotion is this cover supposed to evoke? Half the people on here look really happy and jubilant, while the other half look like they just want to kill someone.
updoots
Cringe LARPing homosexual
Based LARPing Chad
fatherless behavior
You and I both know this isn’t true. The mongols conquered all of Asia
“The horde” is Asian masculinity fanfic, the raiders were Slavs
There were civilizations in Asia, India, Middle East and South America, too.
>South America
>"Civilization"
Any grouo that advocates for ritual human sacrifice is not human.
Amerimutts advocate for cutting off your balls and penis these days. In contrast to that Aztecs were definitely a more advanced civilization by your standard.
Human sacrifice isn't necessarily le bad. Not much difference between executing your captured enemies via firing squad vs. cutting their hearts out at the temple. The issue of course is that this progressed to needing so many sacrifices the empire had to enslave their neighbors and take a blood tax from their subjects, which was ultimately their downfall because everyone was obviously angry that the sun priests stole their family members to sacrifice, which is of course fricked up. But just sacrificing captive enemies isn't that bad to me.
There are quite a few people on these boards who think Western abortion is a roundabout way to sacrifice kids to Molech.
only thing he did wrong was not shoot the fricking traitor navi fricker and his science b***h in the head, when he had the chance
But he did shoot the science b***h
he did?
didn't she just got killed in the general shooting?
been over 10 fricking years since I saw that commie piece of shit movie
hardly remember anything anymore
Yeah, Quaritch takes matters into his own hands and personally shoots at the traitors fleeing the compound. Augustine (aka science b***h) gets mortally injured in the crossfire.
Quaritch is not the type of person to say something like this.
I think Stephen Lang's performance gave the character some subtleties that evoke the spirit of OP's image, but on paper I do agree, the character wouldn't say that
in the thumbnail it kinda looks like they're doing karaoke together
>captcha: 0PKYS
>sharts all over Earth and then tries to escape to another planet like rats from a sinking ship
Whites are pajeets deep down.
>yes killing people to make Shlomo richer so so fricking based!!!
so this is the power of the "redpilled" "saviors of the white race" huh?
>people
>Quadrich got rekt by blue cats
Even better kek
They're basically people. Giant blue people with USB connections on their heads. Other than that there's no functional difference. I mean, they're better than Black folk at least and Black folk are supposedly human.
yes that's what na'vi means
>they are hecking BLUE! kill them now, don't ask any questions
If humanity was so good then why did they destroy Earth?
>yes killing people to make Shlomo richer so so fricking based!!!
That's how boomers are.
earth is doing great. 8% annual ROI from unobtainium stocks.
frick animals and nature, they aren't shareholders
>Earth is doing great
>can't even breath without getting cancer
>earth is doing great
Kek, Avatar Earth is literally a ZOG wet dream.
>wear the mask
>live like bugs
>eat bugs
>own nothing
is that a na'vi hologram in the background?
It's canon that humans love pandoran nature documentaries btw
Contract malaria'vi from contaminated water on Pandora. Die in your own diarrhea, because the Tree Deity was on vacation that month and the prayer and sacrificial fruit basket didn't work out.
Why are you pretending that Earth problems exist on Pandora?
>sickness and death don't exist
It's almost as if it's a fantasy made by and made for mental children.
>film about how great nature is is 100% made in computers
I get it now.
>It's almost as if it's a fantasy
Exactly, so your point about "muh disease" doesn't stand.
What's the point of comparing something to this world, if it's not feasible in any shape or form?
I'm not comparing to this world.
I'm comparing the fictional version of Earth as it is depicted in Avatar, and Pandora, another fictional world in the same setting.
Yep, anon "ZOG" was clearly a thing in Avatar. Clearly, it was a movie about JQ cleverly disguised as a "manifest destiny" critique by master manipulator and future Führer Cameron.
Yeah, it's a fictional world where the rules work differently.
This was one of the problems with the humans in the film. They couldn't differentiate the navi from human savages.
Like they thought their spirit tree was religious mumbo jumbo but it was actually legit.
The scientist lady tried to explain this to them, but they didn't listen.
Anyone getting too caught up in the native american metaphor of the film is falling into the same trap.
It's a neat idea, granted. But that's way too smart for Mr. "But who lays the eggs." Cameron. The movie was clearly about what you've identified it to be.
>scientist speaking truth to power is such a used up cliche
Because humans would never contaminate the water supply and die from lack of healthcare...
At least the navi get to upload themselves to tree heaven if it happens.
And illness won't spread as fast in their population because they're not overpopulated.
Did you know that hunters and gatherers only lived until age 50? What'd you think they died off? Did you know that sickness - such rabies - and a potpourri of parasites - such as tapeworms - are widely contracted by wildlife? It's not exclusive to humans and civilizations. In fact, I'd make a better case arguing the contrary.
>Lifespan: Around 30% longer than humans (roughly 160-180 years)
https://james-camerons-avatar.fandom.com/wiki/Na%27vi#Physiology
>Adam lived 1000 years.
https://old-testament-tanakh.fandom.com/wiki/Je%27ws#Physiology
Good thing the navi chew anti-parasitical tree bark or something.
>unobtainium
What would You name a newly found room temp superconductor special metal? Floatyrockium? Unobtainium is a real term used right this moment all over science and engineering field for fictional materials that have special properties.
Give it a Latin or Greek name so that I don't sound like a toddler, when referring to it.
>all over science
And this means what? Academia is adult-daycare. So fitting, I guess.
No, "unobtanium" is a moniker used in engineering for materials that are needed for concept to work, but don't exist in real life.
The key point is that the material DOES NOT EXIST.
In the Avatar universe, the superconductor definitely exists, so it would either be named after the discoverer, or they would have the privilege of naming it themselves.
And it would not be called unobtanium.
Quit trying to window dress lazy writing.
How will this hold up in the face of the Ewa AI and the Na'Vi being a post apocalyptic society?
He lost. Of course chuds worship a loser.
we need to institute a immediate and complete ban on Neytiri suffering
FAVSTIAN
Total bligger death.
We should take this logic to its natural endpoint, if I have more money than you it's legal for me to kill you.
Nuke the tree from orbit, it's the only way to be sure
>LE GLORIOUS SPACEGLOBOHOMO
Based anons being redpilled about space israelites. I can't believe people here spent 15 years bootlicking a zog bot giving his life to genocide an entire planet for more consooming back on earth.
Reminder that environmentalism is a white man's ideal.
Reminder that white people predominantly live in the country and practice real environmentalism by raising and planting their own food.
Reminder the na'vi are trad.
Reminder that white people were the primary audience that really connected with it because their ancestral blood memories were awakened.
>nooo don't go live in nature and repeatedly impregnate your virgin huntress queen wife and have 6 children and eat fruits straight from trees you have to work 80 hours a week to eat bugs and breathe smog
But how can we make funko pops and watch tiktok without industrialization? Didn't think of that, did you chudcel?
What's the point of all that traddiness, if you never achieve anything?
What does the average person achieve? The average goy stands at a register or sits in a chair staring at a screen for 8 hours a day, barely making ends meet paying rent for property he does not own, and that's his life. It's only really good for the elites who have more human cattle slaves than would be possible in an agrarian society. For the vast majority of people, they'd be better off living in a natural environment with low population, plenty of space and plenty of unpolluted resources. For someone like Bezos, this would be an utter nightmare because he'd have 1/1000000 the human cattle to exploit and be far less wealthy.
Living in the woods is boring. The suffering that civilization causes is a price that is worth paying, even if the project is going to fail. Both success and great tragedy are outcomes that I would welcome, because they're exciting.
Civilization doesn't necessitate excessive industrialization, though it is of course the natural outcome unless it's deliberately stopped. For instance, you can have a community of self-sufficient subsistence farmers. That's civilization. You don't need to frack up huge swathes of land and dump factory runoff into the rivers, poisoning every fricking thing around until your actual blood is toxic. There are levels to this.
It's all or nothing.
Next step of evolution.
achieve what? and towards what end? The best answers I get to this is medicine and comfort and excess. But again to what end? a surplus in resources will just create a population boom and an increasing need for recourses in a vicious cycle. Just throwing out the word "achieve" doesn't invalidate that way of life, especially because (being romanticized as frick as noble savages by the white liberal homosexual cameron) they have a living tree goddess who they chose to stay with even after coming to contact with human technology. A simple life is enough, no need to min max. Again, people were so drawn to that world for a reason, they crave that.
exactly
The knowledge people gained about the world is in itself intriguing to me. So I'd say it's curiosity.
have a nice day
How tall are Na'vi women again?
You could stick your head in her butt while standing up
two inches on my phone screen
sex with blue and brown Zoe at the same time
I want bronze age na'vi with monumental architecture, ships, long trade routes, palace economies and god-kings
>make the most braindead, clichéed morally white and black movie you could ever produce
>/pol/tards make it their mission to show everyone they side with the cartoonishly over the top bad guy because no one will ever touch their dick
but have you considered their skin is blue
Rightards are evil so they always side with the villain.
>thing is cartoonishly over the top evil because gvmt and cooperate rats told me so
Give me on rational [!] reason why humans slaying na'vi is bad, but a lion slaying a zebra isn't.
>uhh actually genocide to make Goldstein richer is ok because Lions and Zebras dude
>beep bop bzzz bzzz *run deflection.script12x-122.ps.exe*
textbook NPC reaction
one is for survival, one is for profit.
Company needs to make a profit so that econ numbers go up so that bills can be paid and people can afford electricity and running water for the most basic needs. Same thing. Next try.
If you have to kill the innocent to survive then you should just fricking die.
Where's the innocence here? The Na'vi win and people on earth die. The humans win and the Na'vi die. There is no innocence here. It's eat or get eaten.
The navi are defending themselves from an invasion. It's not their fault the humans fricked themselves up.
Tell me why is the "invasion" of the humans evil, but when a bug comes into the territory of another bug and replaces him it's not?
Bad analogy. Humans aren't bugs.
Substitute it for a mammal, you diva. Also:
>Humans are animals.
how does evacuating earth force humans to go around burning tribal villages and hunting fully sentient talking whales for their brain fluid
>no profit
>company has to lay off personell
>down at the production chain, people are gonna get thrown onto the streets
>forced to do crime, do drugs out of desperation
>die
You get the picture?
why did humanity put itself in that predicament in the first place?
They didn't? Do you seriously think, humans are in control of the development of their species. Are you 4 years old?
>you can't oppose bad things because someone relies on them
somehow civilization didn't collapse before we started to suck out whale brains
Maybe in your head canon. Have schools not briefed you on the fall of [insert any ancient empire] and its deadly ramifications?
Well, you can oppose it. But what's the moral difference, if you kill off a Na'vi directly or a human indirectly?
>what do you mean holocaust is bad? think of the people that will lose their jobs if we don't buy all this poison gas
you are deranged
Na'vi massacre was economical, 'caust was political going back to the derangement of a handful of men.
>derangement caused by WWI and failure of Weimar republic, both were economical
Also animals sometimes kill only for their own sadistic fun.
Human civilization was unsustainable. Which is why they destroyed their own planet and started destroying another.
The Na'Vi have super convenient biology that lets them live sustainable fulfilling lives without the need for technology.
If they want to fly they can plug themselves into a big bat. If they want lights they just pick up some bio-luminescent plant. If they're dying they download themselves into a tree.
Humanity will probably burn itself out in space while the Na'Vi are still living happily.
I can't wait for the HFYHispanic meltdown when they reveal in the last movie that na'vi are eldar or some shit, and Pandora is some sort of garden world their space-faring ancestors made
>the na'vi used to be hyper-advanced space travelers
I sleep
>the tulkun used to be hyper-advanced space travelers
real shit
That's just Star Trek IV though
he didn't say that
RDA = Terran Federation
Na'vi = Arachnids
that is all
analogy doesn't really work when humans are closer to bugs than the na'vi are
does it? the same chvds who want to send another 300k to get mauled on the bug planet are also demanding a genocide of blue cat people because they are blue
good point