New Black Little Mermaid Disney Junior animated series announced

Ariel is officially black now in all future usage of the character
https://variety.com/2023/tv/global/disney-junior-ariel-the-little-mermaid-1235642365/

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    TRIPLING DOWN ONLY MEANS YOU EARN MORE BACK!
    COME ON! BET IT ALL ON BLACK! ALL ON BLACK!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, they're go full on replacement mode with blackfish Ariel.
      Are they butthurt from raising a generation of redhead lovers?
      The remake bombed so I hope this bombs too.

      Did they really expect TLM remake to make as much as the Lion King one to warrant it new content?

      Hasn't the live action movie been underperforming? I guess it was probably greenlit before the box office results but still not a great idea.

      It doesn't matter whether the movie underperformed. It generated controversy, which generated discussion, which money-men projected could cause money somewhere down the line.

      As long as there are 14 blackwashing threads a day, we will see this trend continue.

      No one cares.

      Don't make me laugh.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >which money-men projected could cause money somewhere down the line
        Which it didn't. Time after time after time. Bad publicity is bad publicity.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >"g-go woke, g-go b-b-broke!"

          Premium cope. The existence of this spinoff show to the last thing you mindless npcs were outraged by testifies to how wrong you are, but please don't let me disturb your ostritching.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Go broke, get woke, ultimately CROAK.
            Cope

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Weren't you guys saying the same for the Mario movie in regards to Girlboss Peach, but then backpedaled when it was a hit?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, stop making stuff up to win imaginary arguments that never happened.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No. Check the catalog. You think that anon who's yelling APOLOGIZE at some movie actually gives a frick about that movie?

                Movies get huge amounts of shills, shitposters and idiots indistinguishable between the two, who don't actually care enough about the shit they're pretending to shitpost to put actual effort in.

                Obsessed trannies that make loads of OC? The dude who is posting all of Spider Man 2099? You can't fake love like that.

                I don't even know exactly what movie someone is yelling apologize about, I just know that the thread is there.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                She was never a girlboss. Mario still did everything as always.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Narratives like that were never true. Look at the comic industry. It one sideadly collapsed.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      THIS, WE NEED MORE GAY BLACK PEOPLE, THE BLACK COMMUNITY NEEDS MORE LGBTQ+ REPRESENTATION

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Well, they're go full on replacement mode with blackfish Ariel.
      Are they butthurt from raising a generation of redhead lovers?
      The remake bombed so I hope this bombs too.

      The idea is pretty simple. You don't like it? It's okay, they'll make the kids like it. You'll just be the old Zoomer man perving after red haired girls, the lowest girl on the totem pole no Gen Alpha kid wants.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >You don't like it? It's okay, they'll make the kids like it.
        There were so many shows I watched as a child that I could tell right away, "Wow, this is shit." Shows you could just tell were trying to preach to you even if you didn't understand yet what they were trying to say. I'm confident in the next generation that they're going to reject this crap all the same, especially because kids want to emulate adults and if their parents still prefer redhead Ariel they will too.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm confident in the next generation
          Teen. Titans. GO!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >because kids want to emulate adults
          Current adults actually watch baby shows for their own entertainment

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The erasal of redheads begins now.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      her hair is still red

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meanwhile, at Costco…

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >now
      every single redhead for the last 20 years has been blackwashed in ALL media

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >says this as there are actual fricking redhead incidentals in Hailey's On It

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >redhead incidentals in Hailey's On It
        What?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I saw some that had red or orange hair

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It began a long time ago.
      It's accelerating though.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No one cares.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cinemaphile does. I do too. IT MAKES ME ANGRY!

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well, they're go full on replacement mode with blackfish Ariel.
    Are they butthurt from raising a generation of redhead lovers?
    The remake bombed so I hope this bombs too.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Did it bomb? It started good but is the legs it stands on that bad?

      • 11 months ago
        Boco

        Heh. Legs.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >classic flounder
    >probably classic sebastian and others as well
    >redesigned ariel

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did they really expect TLM remake to make as much as the Lion King one to warrant it new content?

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have no problem with this. My only problem is that why can’t they just make an all new black mermaid character instead instead of changing something that never needed to be changed?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >My only problem is that why can’t they just make an all new black mermaid character instead instead of changing something that never needed to be changed?
      Outrage bait, obviously. Nobody would give two shits if Disney created an new preschool cartoon with an original black mermaid. But make it Ariel and you'll get a billion articles discussing it. Ironically, this thing makes racism more justified.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Ironically, this thing makes racism more justified.
        It doesn't make it justified, it only shows just how far companies are willing to go to exploit minorities and use them as a shield for bad products.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How does Outrage bait make money though?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Investment firms of course.
          It's not about making money from the consumer, it's about getting more from your financiers.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            But The Little Mermaid lost to Spiderverse and Transformers?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              You think the investment firms care about that?
              I doubt even Disney actually gave a frick about this turd of a movie, so long as they can maintain their credit line they're all set.
              Here's hoping that Comcast debt ends up fricking them over big time, since it's the one cost their financiers have already stated they won't be covering.
              And that's $27 billion worth of debt.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                They really should be focusing on making money because Park attendance is in a downward spiral, merch sales ate stagnating, and the cruise lines are a money sink. Seriously who's STUPUD idea was it to make a Disney Cruise line!?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Disney Cruise Line is clearly lucrative or it would have gone the way of the Star Wars hotel.

                The internet may be able to shame Disney into eliminating their cruise line if enough people make a big stink on how bad cruise ships are on both the atmosphere and the sea.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Also one of their biggest fans turned into bitter enemy is running for President out of spite after fricking up the park he was married at.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I want to get married at Disney World.
                >No Disney characters, though
                What's the freaking point then?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                probably the wife was the one that wanted the wedding there, in other case it would be moronic, and miamigays would be even more moronic for voting for him

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Interesting take. Do you have any receipt?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Short breakdown of the situation in general:

              ?t=664
              And if you don't feel like watching it:
              https://www.summarize.tech/youtu.be/ExXEiMz5Z38?t=664
              TL;DR: Companies have credit lines with banks, investment firms, and other financial institutions, many of those institutions are now implementing their own ESG guidelines, if you don't meet these guidelines your credit rating will be downgraded, limiting how much you can borrow from aforementioned institutions. This is why every company just doubles down when they get caught out in this crap because if they don't they won't be able to get loans and will be insolvent.
              Basically, we're in full late-stage Capitalism, and we're about to find out what happens when line stops going up.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                And before someone says something stupid, no, I am not a commie, I'm just sick of the infinite growth meme that's led to all this shit.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >ESG
                >Infinite Growth
                Pretty good shit except this part.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is it Safe to say these banks.firms etc are running a Ponzi scheme with these companies as willin participants?.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, but that's mainly because the stock market as a whole is basically a glorified Ponzi scheme.
                The part that makes this all worse is that these investment firms are running a Ponzi scheme with our fricking pensions and 401ks.
                Just look at that one Canadian teacher's pension fund that lost something like $80 million when FTX collapsed.
                They're doing the same shit in the stock market.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I legitimately can't wait for it all to come crashing down. Even if it sends the entire civilized world into Mad Max mode. ANYTHING would be better than this bullshit.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The entire Western economy is a Ponzi scheme. That's why they're pushing so hard to have more immigrants. They need a constant flow of new borrowers taking out loans and paying into the system so that stocks and real estate can keep going up.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Too bad that doesn't work either, people aren't having kids because the cost of living has gone through the roof and divorce rape make men want to AVOID marriage at all cost and even immigrants have a worse natality rate than natives after the 1st generation meaning that immigration is just a band-aid at best for a deep problem

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't help that modern propaganda despises traditional families despite them being the ones that bring the most kids.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's an oversimplification. Remember, that these firms can MAKE money even if the value drops. Distress assets. Buy for cheaper price.

                Yes, but that's mainly because the stock market as a whole is basically a glorified Ponzi scheme.
                The part that makes this all worse is that these investment firms are running a Ponzi scheme with our fricking pensions and 401ks.
                Just look at that one Canadian teacher's pension fund that lost something like $80 million when FTX collapsed.
                They're doing the same shit in the stock market.

                Specifically look at the complete disconnect between what wagies feel about the economy, what consumers feel, and about the valuation of the companies that hire the wagies and sell to the consumers.

                [...]

                >unpopular opinion, but there's nothing morally wrong with making old white characters black.
                Correct.

                On one hand, seething chud death is the best outlook on life, followed by Ai bots replacing incels.

                On the other hand, they sould have just made both. Hell, make ching chong ariel, irish ginger ariel, swedish ariel, etc. And have them all be friends.

                Thats what they did for tinkerbell, and the princess line in general.

                > We've had so many white characters in history and so few black protagonists that it's only fair we diversify our older characters for black kids
                Frick no, you goddam racist dipshit.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >https://www.summarize.tech/youtu.be/ExXEiMz5Z38?t=664
                >currently down
                RIP

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is it Safe to say these banks.firms etc are running a Ponzi scheme with these companies as willin participants?.

                Yes, but that's mainly because the stock market as a whole is basically a glorified Ponzi scheme.
                The part that makes this all worse is that these investment firms are running a Ponzi scheme with our fricking pensions and 401ks.
                Just look at that one Canadian teacher's pension fund that lost something like $80 million when FTX collapsed.
                They're doing the same shit in the stock market.

                I legitimately can't wait for it all to come crashing down. Even if it sends the entire civilized world into Mad Max mode. ANYTHING would be better than this bullshit.

                fwiw apparently ESG funds are having more and more of their investors pull out of them. ESG funds are bad return on investment, unsurprisingly.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The REAL shit is when you see class action investor lawsuits over ESG, and people discover how much of the ESG is the board handing money to themselves as diversity consultants.

                Money from investment firms are just loans, they're not profit, you still need profit to function.

                If you aren't bringing in profit, loans only hurt you, not help you. You need profit to actually grow as a business, you aren't growing if you aren't making money. ESG money isn't a magical cureall, you still have to make some semblance of money to function as a business. You people really need to stop referring to it as infinite money, it isn't and loans don't help you long term if you aren't profitable. loans are for expenses, you can't function as a business by doing nothing but paying expenses.

                When interest rates were zero, this really wasn't the case.

                >Be black myself
                >Actually loves this black mermaid, she's as cute as a button
                >But her being a objective, blatant product of rampant reverse racism, blackwashing a classic beloved character, extreme stubborn, unhinged leftist politics and just plain soulless diversity for diversity sake makes me hates her immensely.
                >This cute black mermaid, simply for existing - a replacing for a beloved classic character, will be hated forever.
                >This extreme, hostile push for inclusivity has made others push harder against black characters.
                >Now aspiring black creators who are passionate about wanting to tell a legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black (like me) will be hated right out of the gate.
                >The companies know this yet keeps doing it because they legitimately hate their fans and just want their money.

                I hate this...

                You have my condolences blackanon. Love good shit. Treat mediocre mush like the mediocre mush that it is, even if the powers that be give it a gold star. And don't get LULZ kind of depressed. That's not good for anyone.

                If this was for General Audience, I could maybe understand, but I can't give much too shits about preschool content, I'm sorry

                [...]
                As an black person myself, holy shit you are fricking corny

                Your on Cinemaphile, no matter the context, no matter the attent, people are going to be racist

                """"Blackwashing"""" (or race swapping) was been an thing since the fricking 70s, and nobody gave an frick, it's just people pushing an moronic culture war

                Nobody would have gave your "legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black" story an chance because people are just don't like us, people are going to cry woke no matter what

                Stop actually believe the bullshit reasoning "IT'S ACTUALLY THE LAZY MOMEY HUNGRY COMPANIES THAT ARE MAKING US RACIST"

                It's bullshit because it's hypocritical

                Hey. Cinemaphile is racist against everyone regardless of race. It's very equal in that way.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the government sneaking around the law to enforce ideological conformity is late-stage Capitalism

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >capitalist companies engaging in capitalism with capitalist governments isn't capitalism because i say so

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Government force isn't "capital".

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >promoting left wing value is late stage capitalism
                ?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What left-wing values?
                Giving the workers better pay?
                Giving them ownership of the business they work for?
                Show me some actual left-wing stuff they promote.
                Instead of this divide-and-conquer BS that's usually associated with those on the right.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                commies defend those "capitalist" decisions and consume that divide-an-conquer BS the most

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You mean capitalist shills that only exist as controlled opposition.
                Actually read up on real communist theory instead of just believing what a bunch of buttholes on twitter tell you.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >You mean capitalist shills that only exist as controlled opposition.
                those are the face of your "movement" moron why aren't you calling them out on their bullshit? i know why cuz is not convenient for the commies, they want that shit at the end of the day anyways

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >why aren't you calling them out on their bullshit?
                I do call them out on it.
                It's just that you don't notice it because of the anonymity.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                NTA, but if most of the movement doesn't actually denounce rainbow capitalism and the like, then it's fairly safe to say it's complacent.
                Anecdotally, most of the people at my work that b***h about capitalism also are taking Disney's side in the copyright kerfuffle.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's really odd because they're also the types that support the stifling of free speech.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >are taking Disney's side in the copyright kerfuffle
                Fricking why? Because someone can make a schlocky slasher flick with Winnie the Pooh?
                Do they not know that Disney's whole shtick is taking a massive dump on public domain stories?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because they have only grown with the Disney version.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Do they not know that Disney's whole shtick is taking a massive dump on public domain stories?
                They're the types that don't think shit before repeating it when it comes to politics.
                But to spitball Disney's take, it's greed on their part. It helps them to pull from the existing public domain, but not to give a competitor access to something like Mickey Mouse.

                The left really can't meme.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >then it's fairly safe to say it's complacent
                They are already denouncing every fasset of capitalism. That's why they are communists or socialists. I don't know how that is so hard for you to get. If someone is against murder then they aren't suddenly complicit in it when a trans guy does it. Fact is corporate shilling is a right wing thing. You let this shit happen since you wanna give these soulless pieces of shit all the rights in the world be it through lowering their taxes in every way, giving them government hand-outs or letting them get away with stomping over worker's rights for smaller marginal profit. That's on you, the conservative who supports and celebrate the capitalist system you wanted for yourself.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They are already denouncing every fasset of capitalism
                Except rainbow capitalism.

                >I don't know how that is so hard for you to get
                Because there's practically no pushback from them for this type of shit, so the whole "durr we hate it too" comes off aa disingenuous backpedaling in response to backlash rather than an actual moral consistency.

                Now frick off and have a nice day.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >commies defend those "capitalist" decisions
                Not really. "Commies" defend worker's rights first and foremost. Aren't you guys always crying about cancel culture and how it destroys lives? Why is that okay when you do it?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Boycotts are not cancel culture and I'm sick of yoy morons trying to label them as such. Cancel culture involves trying to ruin a specific person's life and career. Boycotts are simply a refusal to do business

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Cancel culture involves trying to ruin a specific person's life and career.
                >Boycotts are simply a refusal to do business
                You can't be this moronic. Ruining someone's career and life can happen by refusing to business with them. If the soulless corporation which you had no problem before buying shit from because you have no standards goes under then that means workers lose their livelyhood, their means of income. Some people got loans to pay back but that doesn't interest you does it? Not the people at the top get fired first. And just to be clear here. When trannies were boycotting Hogwarts Legacy that wasn't cancel culture right? Because they were refusing to do business like you said.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >When trannies were boycotting Hogwarts Legacy that wasn't cancel culture right? Because they were refusing to do business like you said.
                Not originally no. It became cancel culture when they went after random people for buying/playing/even showing interest in playing the game.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's cancel culture when people get called gays for buying the game
                LOL. You are moving the goalpost hard now. Name three people who lost their life or carreer and weren't just crybabies about being called a bad person because they were consoomer shills

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                A canceling campaign doesn't have to succeed to exist you idiot.
                >"Oh I didn't actually succeed in killing the guy, so I didn't do anything wrong your honor!"
                Had they just boycotted the game, maybe started an information campaign on why they would like for people to not support it, and stopped at that, that would have been completely fine.
                But they didn't, and it came back to bite them in the ass, and now they're being defensive about it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                There was no cancel culture. Interesting how you called it a campagn now. That's called a boycott. Not doing business with someone. The same way the people don't have to do business with other e-celebs by watching their videos. No one got cancelled.

                Pikamee. You deranged Amerimutt subhumans were harassing her so hard and she quit the job.

                In what way? She cancelled herself if anything. She still got views, her assassionation coordiantes didn't get leaked and no one dropped her who wasn't a shill like you. She only got called a gay by others. And she is a groomer.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Going to someone's stream and calling them horrible people and slurs is "not doing business" with them? Trying to contact their employers and get them fired is "not doing business" with them?
                You're fricking unhinged dude.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Oh no they called me a gay clearly this is cancel culture
                >Trying to contact their employers
                Which didn't happen. Congrats though on making up shit that didn't happen.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Which didn't happen.
                homie, people directly contact Vshojo in the case of Silvervale, and GYARI in the case of Pikamee.
                Next time, keep it to a simple boycott, and don't harass people for consuming a product you don't personally like.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's not an employeer you moron. Those are producers and sponsors. Pikamee is a streamer who grooms kids. People showing their producers their "work" ain't the same shit as going to the factory demanding they drop you from your business and then you're not able to work.
                >Harass
                homie she has moderators who can shut off that shit and terms can be banned.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Typical Amerimutt troonygger. have a nice day

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You will never be white.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What utter nonsence. We know exactly why people went afer Pikamee, and it wasn't nonce sense. Get the frick out of Cinemaphile and to /misc/ if you can't stay on topic.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Frick off back to pReddit, invading homosexual.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >redditor shill tells actual anon to go back reddit except failing at even writing plebbit to try and fit in

                Newsflash moron, the "go back" retort doesn't work when YOU are the redditor here. Now frick off back to your shithole already.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Tries to "no u" someone as a pRedditor
                >Redditspaces
                >Doesn't know the "pReddit" variant made to mock Reddit's troony staff.
                You're not fooling anyone. Thanks forthe confirmation, though.

                >Posting VGroomers on Cinemaphile
                Ok Reddit

                Samegay.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It really doesn't matter where that anon is from. What's obvious is that they're not here to talk about comics and cartoons.

                >in all future usage of the character
                Pretty sure they're still going to sell merch of her original version

                I would expect to see A/B testing. Much as there's white and black barbie, I think they'll have both white and black versions of this show's merch. And it will be something like 90/10 white black sold.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What's obvious is that they're not here to talk about comics and cartoons.
                Aren't you rallying for a guy that tried to justify people going after streamers over Hogwarts Legacy.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What's obvious is that they're not here to talk about comics and cartoons
                Dude the guy you're defending entered the thread with a political comic.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure that guy hasn't been in the thread since he posted that, since I was the one who responded to the response to that post.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm pretty sure the guy who wrote

                >commies defend those "capitalist" decisions
                Not really. "Commies" defend worker's rights first and foremost. Aren't you guys always crying about cancel culture and how it destroys lives? Why is that okay when you do it?

                also made

                >Cancel culture involves trying to ruin a specific person's life and career.
                >Boycotts are simply a refusal to do business
                You can't be this moronic. Ruining someone's career and life can happen by refusing to business with them. If the soulless corporation which you had no problem before buying shit from because you have no standards goes under then that means workers lose their livelyhood, their means of income. Some people got loans to pay back but that doesn't interest you does it? Not the people at the top get fired first. And just to be clear here. When trannies were boycotting Hogwarts Legacy that wasn't cancel culture right? Because they were refusing to do business like you said.

                .
                Still up in the air about

                >then it's fairly safe to say it's complacent
                They are already denouncing every fasset of capitalism. That's why they are communists or socialists. I don't know how that is so hard for you to get. If someone is against murder then they aren't suddenly complicit in it when a trans guy does it. Fact is corporate shilling is a right wing thing. You let this shit happen since you wanna give these soulless pieces of shit all the rights in the world be it through lowering their taxes in every way, giving them government hand-outs or letting them get away with stomping over worker's rights for smaller marginal profit. That's on you, the conservative who supports and celebrate the capitalist system you wanted for yourself.

                .

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, I messed up the chain, when I had a quick look. I responded to

                >Cancel culture involves trying to ruin a specific person's life and career.
                >Boycotts are simply a refusal to do business
                You can't be this moronic. Ruining someone's career and life can happen by refusing to business with them. If the soulless corporation which you had no problem before buying shit from because you have no standards goes under then that means workers lose their livelyhood, their means of income. Some people got loans to pay back but that doesn't interest you does it? Not the people at the top get fired first. And just to be clear here. When trannies were boycotting Hogwarts Legacy that wasn't cancel culture right? Because they were refusing to do business like you said.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Posting VGroomers on Cinemaphile
                Ok Reddit

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That's not an employeer you moron.
                homie, Pikamee was literally hired by GYARI to stream as part of the VOMS project.
                That's like saying that you're only sponsored by Walmart as a door greeter.
                You're straight up unhinged, and arguing with fricking /misc/ would be less of a waste of my time, because you can at least get a funny reaction out of them once in a while.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                why are leftoids so disingenuous?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why are conservatards so okay with tons of people losing their job because a trannie got a personal beer can?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                because being principled only lead to losing ground, getting subverted and backstabbed

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Deflection into revising the Budweiser boycott
                Nobody went after specific employees you disingenuous troony, except the people directly responsible for the campaign.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                These types of disingenuous trannies are literally in a cult mindset.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >She cancelled herself if anything
                DARVO'ing homosexual.
                You need to be beaten to death with a tire iron.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Pikamee. You deranged Amerimutt subhumans were harassing her so hard and she quit the job.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Some shitskin Japanese mutt larping as an anime girl to groom underage kids got bullied off the internet
                BASED woke trash gets removed and makes the world a better place

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                you don't get to play the "think about others" card only when your side is losing. the left has consistently appealed to morals and dignity when in a weak position only to slit your throat as soon as they have power. it's sad but that's how it's gotta be now.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >only to slit your throat as soon as they have power
                >it's another "rightoids projecting their Turner Diaries fantasies" episode

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I can only read things literally
                not much projection, left cries, right relents, left backstabs, right retaliates, left cries. one cannot blame their opponent for using the very tactics they do.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Bash the Fash!
                >Kill all Nazis!
                >We need to kill them or they will genocide trans kids!
                >What the frick, stop saying that we're violent. You're projecting!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Peddle this shit elsewhere and play ignorant all you want but the left is at the forefront of this shit, i.e diversity, inclusion, environment, ect. There is no divide and conquer, I don't like you, I want nothing to do with you, I think the only thing you deserve is a bullet to the back of your skull and a shallow grave.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This homosexual spams Cinemaphile with this shit to recruit. He trolls around the media boards to spread this.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is literally the first time I've made a post like that.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                If it is, it better be the last.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it's afraid

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Frick you, you want to "redpill" because you want Cinemaphile to be dumpsters like Cinemaphile & Cinemaphile.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It probably won't.
                If someone asks me again I'll probably just post something similar since using a video alongside summarize.tech is pretty useful for this kind of stuff.
                Not sure why you have an issue with it, you sound like a schizo.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Money from investment firms are just loans, they're not profit, you still need profit to function.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              You also need loans to function.
              $2 billion in loans is a lot more useful than $300 million in profit.
              That said, ESG is a money pit since it results in products that people don't want to buy, which just results in companies wracking up debt that they won't be able to pay back since their products don't sell.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you aren't bringing in profit, loans only hurt you, not help you. You need profit to actually grow as a business, you aren't growing if you aren't making money. ESG money isn't a magical cureall, you still have to make some semblance of money to function as a business. You people really need to stop referring to it as infinite money, it isn't and loans don't help you long term if you aren't profitable. loans are for expenses, you can't function as a business by doing nothing but paying expenses.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because no one would give a shit?

      Disney doesn't have to make new ips, just repackage what it already have.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Replacement, Satan.
      It's pure replacement

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      To generate controversy/publicity while still looking like "the good guys" for promoting diversity or whatever. Just an elaborate marketing scheme basically.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Outrage marketing is a thing
        Is that why the film did so "well?"

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Outrage marketing never works. The phrase "There's no such thing as bad publicity" is a fricking lie.
          The people complaining about the movie won't even watch it, and the people who are upset have a right to be upset. All it does is create a bunch of bad press.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It works but it doesn't last long and causes more harm over the long run, unless the people who were outraged in the first place don't matter anymore. That was Trumps tactic, but eventually people got bored of it. The music industry too during the satanic panic, and none of the outraged parents were going to buy their music anyways. South Park did it too.

            Basically if your audience is edgy teenagers it works.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >That was Trumps tactic
              Brainlet take

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've seen that vid. At 27:25 he pretty much agrees with what I said. Did you just really really really want to show me this vid or something?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >At 27:25 he pretty much agrees with what I said
                Yeah, sure, he pretty much agrees with you.
                You know, if you forget the rest of the video and look at this very specific cherry picked part and then paraphrase it to the point where it loses context, sure, the video agrees.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The people complaining about the movie won't even watch it
            I don't get why people think someone would do this. I've never bought/consumed something I've been complain about beforehand.
            Being scorned by a product, and then complain afterwards, sure, but if I clearly don't like something, why the frick would I want to use my money on it?
            At most I would pirate it to see just how valid my grievances were, and even that is extremely rare.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Outrage marketing is only viable if you're a literal nobody not a multi-billion dollar conglomerate with infinite reach.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Instantly recognizable and marketable name is instantly recognizable and marketable. Unironically the "just consume product" image

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I have no problem with this. My only problem is that why can’t they just make an all new black mermaid character instead instead of changing something that never needed to be changed?

      When they made "something new" with a brand new black main character we got the black hero of Strange World. Oh, and Soul. Remember Soul? People occasionally do, but only occasionally.
      No, they need a black main character that's a success, and they've been shit at making their own from scratch. So scratch off the serial numbers of a successful white character and say "you're racist if you see anything wrong with this approach!"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      well satan, it's always been easier to bank off an established name than it is to make something new, companies would always rather just slap a minority on an existing character instead of taking a risk on a new IP because they know people will eat it up like the slop it is anyway just because it's "black/asian/mexian/etc. version of X" and because you can always use racism as an excuse to cover your ass when it flops

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You should know more than anybody else Satan.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hasn't the live action movie been underperforming? I guess it was probably greenlit before the box office results but still not a great idea.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Hasn't the live action movie been underperforming?
      These shows are usually developed before the movies are, so in all likelihood. The idea of making Ariel black was in the works for a while. This is going to be her new canon design eventually.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This is going to be her new canon design eventually.
        It's funny I saw people saying this after Bailey's casting but I figured it would be relegated just to live action - after all Cinderella doesn't look like Lily James nor Belle like Emma Watson etc they still have their classic look.
        But now with this? Where they even have black Ariel with classic Flounder? Are they really going to try to make black Ariel a permanent thing?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This is going to be her new canon design eventually.

        Rocketeer

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The Disney Jr show was greenlit as a tie-in to a canned "Black woman takes on the Rocketeer mantle" movie.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This is going to be her new canon design eventually.

        We shall see.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe if the movie hadn't flopped it might be.

          But it did, so it won't.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        isn't you stupid c**t!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's doing better than Spiderverse 2. Moving more merch too.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Good, they can accelerate every other animation company demolishing them with record losses to prove “a point”

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    absolutely BASED disney killing themselves

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They also replaced white Ariel in the theme parks.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Animated Ariel still has her Grotto at Magic Kingdom, Black Ariel is just at the Studios.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        yeah and miles replacing peter only happened in ultimate marvel.
        give them time.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why would Sony get rid of Peter? They can sell both Peter AND Miles to audiences this way. I would love to hear the poltard explanation out of this one.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I can't give you the poltard explanation, but the "basic observational skills" explanation is ESG.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      For now. I give her 1 or 2 years before they bring back the original.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >bland, pale dress
      >generic black girl appearance
      How the FRICK would anyone know this is a character except for the attending Cast Members?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's kind of wild how everyone (rightfully) mocked the BatB remake for it's lame yellow dress but TLM's dress is just as lame. It's like Cinderella was the only film with an actual costume designer.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wait until no child recognizes this bland she boon as Ariel. then she disappears from Yidsney parks

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you told me this was the prequel and a spin-off showing the origins of calypso from pirates of the Carribbean and I'd honestly believe you.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Damn, there go better ideas than Disney will use.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are they going to preplace her in the Disney Princess line, Ralph Breaks the Internet and Kingdom Hearts, too?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's supposed to be Ariel? I thought they were random people at some beach.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      and people say the gingercide and the white replacement doesn't exist

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      some anon had it right
      >Welfariel

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      To sell new toys and merch. That's all this is about.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Unpopular redesign
        >Sell more merch

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"uhhhh stop crying, the original is still there!!!11!"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Oh no the original still exists!!!
      >Let’s recolor and redraw it to look like the remake just to prove our point.
      >Yeah it’ll be inconsistent with where it takes place in but we are rich we are always right.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        This looks horrible. I can't put my finger on why.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          All this shit makes me wonder how far back they were planning to blackwash the character.
          Something else weird I noticed is that in KH3, the Disney summons in that game have a glowing effect on them. At least some do. Stitch looks the same beneath it all, Ralph has glitchy visuals. Simba gets a fiery mane.
          Ariel's the only one though with her entire color scheming is changed, since her entire body is a water texture.

          Not sure if it's something they did just to showcase her attack or if Disney slid a mandate into an email somewhere, but I'm completely skeptic after all this shit.

          Body's too saturated.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            ~~*They*~~ go as far as blackwashing every white person in the history books.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Native American Mermaid? She's hot.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think it's the overall facial expression, it was drawn to work as a static image (especially the teeth and how the head is oriented towards the camera) and that's why it feels odd.
          The original looks horrible too, but it's a single frame of a bigger sequence of images, it looks completely natural in motion.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Unironically they are doing the 100th anniversary group short before Wish with all Disney characters and I will not be surprised if she’s drawn black in that

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I guess they do have to get them as young as possible in order to push their racebending agenda.
    Since everyone older prefers ginger Ariel.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Finally the way Andersen intended it

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine throwing your original audience (white Christian suburban families) just to chase short term profits from liberal rainbow haired alphabet people who don't even watch your movies and cartoons.
    And to think I loved you as a kid, Disney.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The idea is that because whites are only 53% of kids now, they should focus on minorities. Somehow this means instead of having mexican ariel, they have black ariel.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn’t this movie bomb hard? Only people in the US cared about it, and it was a select group inside the US?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It made almost half a million. About Cinderella numbers.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but they spent over twice as much making it.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It made 400 million, while needing 500 million just to BREAK EVEN.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    THE PORN STARTS NOW!

    • 11 months ago
      The Demon

      No one likes porn of those people though

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        bullshit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah there may be some rule 34 in the coming weeks. But I don't expect much of it until it premieres.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It started long ago. One of the mermen they cast in the new movie was a porn star.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Race traitor.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Welp, looks like she will be permanently retired in the near future.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, Disney was betting pretty hard on this black Ariel thing

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is that other Little mermaid show on disney plus?
    The one where Ariel had a black deaf mermaid friend who had a sign language octopus sidekick?

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    CUTE AND FUNNY!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      SHILL AND GARBAGE

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        what?

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's actually cute in animation
    Why the frick did they do a live action when they could have just do a 3d version?

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not really surprised. Movie kinda bombed but I doubt the merch sales are weak, they could probably stretch this version of Ariel for a few years, pander towards black children and rake in some heavy cash

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >lives underwater
    >skin has evolved melanin
    EXPLAIN
    EXPLAIN
    EXPLAIN

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Explain what? She’s a talking fish girl

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    At least her face doesn't like like a mix between a human and fish.

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    dear god

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Black Ariel kidnapped the Flounder of White Ariel's universe because her own Flounder is a photorealistic fish

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I guess at least Flounder is back to normal.
    Is this the plan? Go extreme on every point so when they scale back on the ugly animals, people will accept the race swapped girls as a "it could be worse" deal?

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This just reminded me of an alice in wonderland show they announced where alice would bake cakes or something. Did that ever come out?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, Katheryn Beaumont is apparently going to do a voice for the series

  30. 11 months ago
    Boco

    Watch it flop like that Rocketeer cartoon.

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ariel is officially black now in all future usage of the character

    It literally says it's a tie-in to the live action movie.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is Disney moronic?

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would bet fricking money that Disney is at least seriously considering reanimating the 1989 original to replace Ariel with this version at this point.

    How the frick did we get here

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >how did we get here
      disney got hijacked by the pettiest, most idiotic exemplars of the average woke womyn
      i also found your pic quite funny btw, so here have a reaction pic

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well that and their largest stakeholder is a corporation itself that bases loans and investment on a literal diversity score. So everyone who knows they are losing money have to grin and bear it and bring on another diversity hire who knows they can do no wrong.

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    so predictable
    and by that I mean your reaction.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh, for Pete's Sake! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Was obviously in production during the live action movie's filming
    Yes

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    As long as she is not gay i don't see a problem with this

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ironically already looks better than the shit movie

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is just a tie-in on the live action movie that was in production before it didn’t make the splash they were hoping for(description says it takes place in the Caribbean just like the film). So they’re still releasing it because it would a waste to just shelve it, plus it still made money even though it didn’t make as much as they wanted it too. Although it does seem a bit weird they went back to using classic flounder, probably because he didn’t really have as much of a drastic change as Sebastian did.

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We're teaching our children to be okay with genocide, the erasing of history, and the destruction of our myths and culture before they can even speak

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Disney films are myth and culture
      America moment

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        They are culture, homosexual.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Amerimutt "culture" is cartoons
          Sad

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Entertainment and art is a part of culture, yes.
            >Teehee, I don't care because I look down on it!
            Okay. Then leave.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Your “culture” is staying in your parents basement your entire life and fapping to e-girls
            You play no part in the culture of your country because you don’t participate in that society

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Watching them subvert and destroy everything Disney created is just sad. Walt is spinning so fast in his grave they use him as a turbine to power the parks and most of Flordia. This movie made people love Disney again and it made Disney care about good animation again. Yet we allow them to repeatedly ruin kill burn everything Disney created. Now they're going to go on and on how its racist not to watch this how nazis are costing Disney billions. God if only Walt could see what was happening to his legacy

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      take your meds schizo

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks for proving anon is right.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Walt Disney raped me.

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Make your own shit, you leech. Or do we have to do that for you too?

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Unbelievable and disgusting

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. This cartoon is unironically white genocide

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        And that's a good thing.

  45. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    well they got her eyes right this time. and this one's actually black instead of tan, and hair is actually red instead of orange
    on the other hand she's wearing a fulllll concealing top. can't show navels, that could warp kids!

  46. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    On one hand, seething chud death is the best outlook on life, followed by Ai bots replacing incels.

    On the other hand, they sould have just made both. Hell, make ching chong ariel, irish ginger ariel, swedish ariel, etc. And have them all be friends.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Into the Ariel-Verse

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      B-But Chuds told me it was flopping! Was I lied to?!

      You lost Chud. Even before factoring in DVD sales, rentals, Disney plus value and merchandise.

      Say it with me:
      OUR ARIEL

      You lost Chud. Even before factoring in DVD sales, rentals, Disney plus value and merchandise.

      Say it with me:
      OUR ARIEL

      >can't say Black person
      >can't say moron
      >can't say b***h
      >can't say homosexual
      >make up totally meaningless word
      >no one knows what the frick it even means (nothing)
      >”w-well s-see it's this movie from the 80s…”
      >”i-it's you!”
      >you look like a Black person moron b***h homosexual for saying it

      One last thing, anyone who ever used this "insult" does not pass, never has passed, and never will pass.

      >Captcha: YNYNM4

  47. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    fixed

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why didn't they just make an original character? They could change up the colors of her tail and top.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      She just looks like a mutt now

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      you just made her light-skinned, idiot

  48. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    B-But Chuds told me it was flopping! Was I lied to?!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't know how animation works

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You lost Chud. Even before factoring in DVD sales, rentals, Disney plus value and merchandise.

        Say it with me:
        OUR ARIEL

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why doesn't she look this good in the movie.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Even before factoring in DVD sales, rentals, Disney plus value
          This is a troll post, right?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            of course it is

  49. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >They could of have an "Ariel & Friends."
    >Have Ariel be the sole white girl mermaid and have her mermaid friends be every other mix-n-match of ethnicities and genders in existence, and make new ethnicities and genders as well.
    >Can make a "Disney Mermaids" like "Disney Fairies."

    >But no.
    Fools!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      it would've caused a backlash if they made ariel white again after doing a black movie. This is just how she is now, going back would literally cause people to bring pitchforks to their studios

  50. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    At least the fish looks right
    Why is she a full on Black when the actress is a half breed?
    Not even from the same area in Africa either

  51. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    When you go black your profit margins never bounce back

  52. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have to point out Black Rock is behind this. At least they're not having a good time lately. Black Rock is having to hire security guards and they fear for their public safety since they're being called out in the streets lol.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have a security clearance, wonder what security company he works for...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      knowing that he is living in constant fear is so satisfying to see

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >"you didn't have guards and home security before?"
      Aside from his ESG shit, he's one of the most powerful people in America, if not the world. Him not already having security sounds like a poorly-designed level in the Hitman series.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Probably increased security. He probably didn't have multiple guards watching over one of his homes at night.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          He absolutely did. The new shit is that he can claim that it's an ESG expense, and apply for grants, or count those dollars for diversity.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frick you, you want to "redpill" because you want Cinemaphile to be dumpsters like Cinemaphile & Cinemaphile.

        t. Reddit migrants here because of the r/adviceanimals blackout and the like

  53. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol looks so bad not even babies are gonna watch it

  54. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You guys realize this is an preschool show, right

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      If this was for General Audience, I could maybe understand, but I can't give much too shits about preschool content, I'm sorry

      >Be black myself
      >Actually loves this black mermaid, she's as cute as a button
      >But her being a objective, blatant product of rampant reverse racism, blackwashing a classic beloved character, extreme stubborn, unhinged leftist politics and just plain soulless diversity for diversity sake makes me hates her immensely.
      >This cute black mermaid, simply for existing - a replacing for a beloved classic character, will be hated forever.
      >This extreme, hostile push for inclusivity has made others push harder against black characters.
      >Now aspiring black creators who are passionate about wanting to tell a legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black (like me) will be hated right out of the gate.
      >The companies know this yet keeps doing it because they legitimately hate their fans and just want their money.

      I hate this...

      As an black person myself, holy shit you are fricking corny

      Your on Cinemaphile, no matter the context, no matter the attent, people are going to be racist

      """"Blackwashing"""" (or race swapping) was been an thing since the fricking 70s, and nobody gave an frick, it's just people pushing an moronic culture war

      Nobody would have gave your "legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black" story an chance because people are just don't like us, people are going to cry woke no matter what

      Stop actually believe the bullshit reasoning "IT'S ACTUALLY THE LAZY MOMEY HUNGRY COMPANIES THAT ARE MAKING US RACIST"

      It's bullshit because it's hypocritical

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your post loses a lot of its bite when it's full of shit grammar and spelling mistakes, just FYI.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          that troony's bait is also fricking stale as hell too, not even fun to engage with

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >As an black person myself
        pic of your hands and nose with a timestamp, otherwise you're a israelite or a selfhating communist cracker

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous
          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            i believe you even though you didn't timestamp correctly

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Wow anon, really cool timestamp.
            By the way, here's me.

  55. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Be black myself
    >Actually loves this black mermaid, she's as cute as a button
    >But her being a objective, blatant product of rampant reverse racism, blackwashing a classic beloved character, extreme stubborn, unhinged leftist politics and just plain soulless diversity for diversity sake makes me hates her immensely.
    >This cute black mermaid, simply for existing - a replacing for a beloved classic character, will be hated forever.
    >This extreme, hostile push for inclusivity has made others push harder against black characters.
    >Now aspiring black creators who are passionate about wanting to tell a legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black (like me) will be hated right out of the gate.
    >The companies know this yet keeps doing it because they legitimately hate their fans and just want their money.

    I hate this...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the design is cute, however the motives behind her creation are evil and ugly

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe this can cheer you up

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      As someone who's working on an action show with a female lead i i know how you feel.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's nothing wrong with liking a black version of the Little Mermaid if you're black. Hell, if she'd have been released just a decade or two earlier, no one would care. Nobody cared about Brandy's Cinderella.

      They definitely should've done it like that: make a black version of the same story for black audiences. Black Barbie, white Barbie. By kicking around the original audiences and saying they're racist for not liking the black mermaid (and saying they can't have the white version back) they've destroyed her reputation like you said.

      >Now aspiring black creators who are passionate about wanting to tell a legit, original, great story about a character who just so happens to be black (like me) will be hated right out of the gate.

      Just say you want to do a black version of a story or from your viewpoint and everyone will support it. Just don't replace a white character and kick the audience, since that's what people are really angry about. People are angry at the subversion, not black storytellers.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hanwiener wasn't great, but I respect that movie far more than any of these "we took the character you know and turned them black" movies. I respect attempts to make new black characters over attempts to take existing white characters and go "they're black now."

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm just waitin' for Mapache to do his thing

  56. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    So they're just "old white characters" to you?

  57. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm convinced all this forced woke shit dispite losing billions because of it is due to blackmail. Someone has to know who raped who and/or where the bodies were buried or something. Only terrible, terrible things like these could possibly be worth your entire bussiness. Silence at all costs.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't Disney a mason? There's a lot of them at Disney, like Alex Hirsch was also pushing masonry in kid show form. Stan is even a shriner.

      All masons have something dark to hide. You don't get that far without having blackmail.

  58. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >unpopular opinion, but there's nothing morally wrong with making old female characters trans. We've had so many female characters in history and so few trans protagonists that it's only fair we diversify our female characters for trans kids
    MILES MORALES LIKES WHITE troony DICK

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >is based on OG Peter's dead girlfriend
        Okay.
        Is Spiderverse Gwen dead?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Look at her and tell me she isn't trans, she's more manly than Miles!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >she's more manly than Miles!
          Wait, maybe Miles was the real troony this whole time!

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, the "Peter" from Gwen's universe is the pooner.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Then why is she being played by a BIOFEM?!

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            this is the person that's going to be Gwen Stacy in the live action adaptation

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              If so, then she'll most likely be Pete's love interest.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Hunter is taller than tom
                jesus christ

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, so now the:
            >characters can only be voiced by people of the same skin color, heritage, sex, gender, etc...
            bullshit turns out to be real... how convenient.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I mean with a hair like that, I would have thought she's just a butch lesbian

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      PETER PARKER LIKES WHITE troony DICK

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What if they went trough the original Sins Past plan?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's the original cis gendered gwen stacy, spider-gwen is trans however

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Canon. Event.

  59. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've been aware about this show's development since last year
    >t. someone who works at disney and reguarly browses Cinemaphile

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      why do they do this? you might have the answer

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's pretty obvious why. Just look at all the attention this thread is getting for a simple preschool cartoon

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Just look at all the attention this thread is getting for a simple preschool cartoon
          i don't think disney would like to be in more controversy

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        different anon but it's safe to say Disney thought the LM remake was going to do gangbusters, so they wanted to exploit that success as much as possible. We're only seeing it now to recover costs and farm good press.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yo, any shit that you think we'd LOVE the frick out of and deserves more attention?

      If it is, it better be the last.

      LOL. Youre right that political discussion doesn't belong here, but saying it like THAT just puts a "please troll my roody poo ass" sticker on your forehead.

  60. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >More Sinegrita

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Sinegrita
      la sirenita es una negra ahora y para siempre 🙁

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ni siquiera es buena.
        Esta SIEMPRE sera mi negra:

  61. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >biggest announcement
    Who didn't expect them to do this? Could've made $5.00 and they still would've had this in production and pushed it out because BLM!

  62. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Wowee zowee, I can't believe country that is predominantly white would make more white characters. Truly, an unfair representation.

  63. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  64. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    God dammit Thompson the script said she was a GINGER not a N-

  65. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Look on the bright side.
    At least the animals aren't hyperrealistic anymore.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Would.
      But with my eyes closed, pretending she's still Sisu.

  66. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fixed to be movie accurate

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >"Fixed to be movie accurate"
      >Flounder only sort of looks ugly

  67. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    "It's just one movie, we're not stealing your culture permanently, geez!" - someone doing exactly that.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the meme of them loving to steal is being reinforced so much that they shouldn't complain about it, they are even proud of being known as thieves

  68. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    GINGERCIDE IS REAL

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Elsa's sister and hercules are redheads?
      the live action adaptation of brave is gonna be so black holy shit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        live action hercules is in the works and he and zues will be black. just watch

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anna's not good enough to be a redhead. She looks blonde in some art but brunette in others.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Anna is blonde idk why that redditor put her with the other redheads

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      go back to plebbit, gay
      oh wait you can't 🙂

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >All redheads are now black
      >JKR says Hermione is black
      >Ron's now black
      >Ginny's now called Niggy
      >Lily Potter is black, thus making Harry half black
      WE WUZ WIZZERS N SHEIT

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >>Lily Potter is black, thus making Harry half black

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he says this as Lindsay Lohan still has a career in Hollywood

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Bet you can't even list something she's been in in the last five years offhand.

  69. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i'm a leftist and I can't defend this

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      try your best, let's see what you got

  70. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    no shes not you stupid c**t!

  71. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She's a carrier. All the other princesses are doomed. They're doomed!

  72. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shouldnt all the black mermaids drown underwater?

  73. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Making a series just to try and recoup losses with merch sales
    I don't think this is going to go how they want it to.

  74. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Notice how they made Tinkerbell black in the recent Peter Pan?
    Nobody noticed anything in the recent Peter Pan.
    Not even the fact that there was a recent Peter Pan.

  75. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >obsessed
    >vaguely socialist
    >ESL
    Oh yeah, it's Third Worlder time.

  76. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    im excited for the black e-girl art that i can fap to

  77. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    this one is actually cute and looks more like ariel though

  78. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they use new Ariel they should have to use new Flounder as well, no picking and choosing

  79. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Flounder looks sorry for her in the OP image.

  80. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They kept her red hair this time so I'm fine with it

  81. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Gross

  82. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >using this actress is fine because she 'sort of looks like the character' (if you squint) and the skin tone isn't important anyways
    >edit the animated character to more closely represent the actress anyways

  83. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ariel is officially black now in all future usage of the character
    Why do you morons always make up dumb shit?

  84. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >in all future usage of the character
    Pretty sure they're still going to sell merch of her original version

  85. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >New Black [...] series announced
    wow, it sure is weekday.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *