Just when I thought this man couldn't get anymore based
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Nic Pizzolatto respons to misogyny accusation
Just when I thought this man couldn't get anymore based
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Based
?
>nobody mentioned a small penis but you
My dood...
Mine isn't technically small because it's very girthy, six inches around. It's just that it's only one inch long. They used to call me Tuna Can back in school
Dan?
>very girthy, six inches around. It's just that it's only one inch long.
King of Chodes
Mine is 12” long but only about 5mm wide. They used to call me ragu but that’s bullshit because ragu is the sauce. Although maybe they were commenting on how I cum blood.
well he's not broke s that's the only other insult women have
In his defense that's usually what they jump to when "misogynist" doesn't work.
Don't pretend like dj1028 didn't already have it in the chamber for the next reply
>Movie Reviewer: This show sucked, but I want to keep my job so at least I will say that it had a "Message".
>Nic Pizzolatto: Look, you can't change the size of your penis, you are born that way! Besides it is how you treat people that really matter more than penis size!
stop being a moronic simp, everyone knows mocking dick size is these moron's goto insult
They aren't going to frick. They find submissive men like you repulsive
its called foreshadowing
>pretending every dumb bawd doesn’t throw around “small dick energy”
The fact you only focused on the small penis part proves your projection
>incel (TOP insult from stupid fricking c**ts who never even heard of the term until a few years ago and probably don't even know what it stands for)
>hates women/misogynist
>small dick
>loser
>basement dweller
There you go just listed 99% of the shit any woman will throw at you if you dare criticize them in any way, ever. Men who uses these insults are woman-brained of course.
I'm all of those except the small dick lmao.
Imagine having discourse with women
I simply ignore them
mine's not thick but it's veiny - which gives the illusion of thickness.
and now you...hmmm, WEIRD
I'm intensely attracted to girls like this, despite the fact that I don't appreciate arrogance and I'm usually at odds with their political views.
What does that say about me?
you want to tame them.
like a horsebreaker enjoys the work
Probably accurate
You never argued with a woman.
Nobody argues with women, attempting to do so only results in voluntary loss of brain cells
Whatever do you mean, sir. Feminists would never start randomly attacking the sexual organs of those they disagree with. You must have a small penis, chud
a self report
By you, just now. Little dick cuckboi
Nobody mentioned "misogyny" before that homosexual did, either.
you need to go back
>muh
Lol this dude definitely posts on Cinemaphile
The new season was really bad and it's confusing watching people try to act like it was some kind of masterpiece
They are called shills bro
And That’s were most of the advertising budget go now a days
Can confirm. I was hired multiple times to perform "covert marketing" and "brand defense" on Cinemaphile and various cherry picked forums.
They’re not people
I don't get why he's seething so much. Why didn't he just sign on to showrun season 4 then?
He was kicked off his own show. He signed a deal with Fox and HBO got butthurt about it
Because real legends know when to walk away
He frequents these boards for sure
Based. I want a kino written by Pizza Man and directed by Zahler.
The worlds is too fallen for such kino.
shit yea
until then try:
let me guess, everyone's going to say that S1-3 are based now after shitting on seasons 2 and 3 for years.
Not me. S1 is sublime, and it's the only season worth watching imo.
To rinse your mind of the dumpsterjuice smell of TD-S4, I prescribe the following:
True Detective - Season 1
The Terror - Season 1
Mare Of Easttown
Each has elements that counteract and neutralize the hodgepodge of noxious bits that is S4. Am I missing anything?
hey loser, using big words doesn't make you smart xD
Season 2 has been popular here for at least the last two or three years.
Season 3 was only bad because of the ending.
and the reinvention of history begins.
Caspere knew this
>When I was a kid my father used to tell me that nightmares weren't real. Then one day he saw a man burn to death. Well, Ray. Santa ain't real either, but I still get fricking presents for Christmas.
>It's a dog eat dog world and I'm the fricking Chinaman
Nope frick off shill. Seasons 2 and 3 had their flaws but Cinemaphile kept watching it and generally enjoyed them. I think the endings to both pissed people off however.
The plot twists pissed people off. Season 4 depsite this fell down the same rabbit hole.
based. Season 2 was subjected to a cross-media neg-campaign because Vince Vaughn was in it, this was just one small part of the broader psyop that was the election season center-left gearing up to hate white males and shame them into voting for Hillary.
Its true Season 2 had too many characters but those vestigial characters were the stronk womyn and gay warrior, shoehorned concession characters Pizzalotto made to the HBO israelites. It was a dumb move that sacrificed plot/story integrity to try to get some insulation from the inevitable neg-campaign.
Season 3 was a demoralized Pizzalotto phoning it in with some "uppity Black" and "black dick prison rape" dialogue and a nothing-happened ending.
Funny, I have the complete opposite opinion. What was bad about s3's ending you guys?
Season 3 had the black guy with the Israelite name right? That. That’s what was wrong.
Season 1 cemented his reputation as a genius. Doesn't matter how shit 2 and how mediocre 3 was. This guy can spend the rest of his life making absolute shit and I would still admire him.
>shitting on seasons 2 and 3
I always liked season 2
No. Season 1 is the only good one.
Season 2 was just nice to watch for memes but you had to be here, Caspere posting was one of the best things that happened on this board.
Season 3 is filled with Black folk so I skipped
its kind of embarrasing watching him side with the chuds as a cope for him being kicked off because seasons 2 and 3 sucked.
its an example on how people get sucked into the culture war if nothing else i suppose.
yep i already see it everywhere on here, rightoids now see it as a political thing so they feel they have to 'like' seasons 2 and 3 now.
>rightoids now see it as a political thing so they feel they have to 'like' seasons 2 and 3 now
no that's something lefties do
season 2 is terrible
The orgy scene was amazing, vince was pure gold, not sure what even that shoot out was. S2 was a trip.
I hate the boring shit plot of season 2 so much. farrell and vince were alright, they could've had them as partners investigating a ufo crash, literally anything other than stolen diamonds and horseshit.
>implying I’ve even watched anything but season 1
Honestly don’t know why I even came into this thread
This board has been trying to spin S2 as a misunderstood masterpiece since it first aired
We memed s2 and s3 here a lot. But you’d know that if you weren’t a shill.
We liked season 2 tho,
>vinceposting
>fat pussy saluting his dad
>Rachel McAdams browsing blacked memes
Every week was filled with discussion and memes, truly a little golden age.
they were great threads, great OC, lots of laughs
>vinceposting
It was Frankposting, get it right before I get apoplectic.
Season 2 has some 10/10 writing sprinkled throughout a southern California noir story that maybe had too much going on, but I like it.
>The trees are like giants
I always liked S3 because Ali and Dorf had kino chemistry. It's just didn't stick the landing is all. S2 needed less of a cast and more focused story, it suffered for being too rushed. McAdams ass tho.... Mmm....
season 3 sucked apart from the current day dementia scenes. boring tbh
dj1028 is unironically correct. Many people gleefully obsess over hating something that isn't even that bad because they don't like the people who made it. It's not that deep. nicpizzolatto sounds way too angry. It's also hilarious that he thinks misandry is real. But he can say whatever he wants because he's a man and men have all the power. Men will hate women and then cry victim when a woman fights back.
this. men are basically the israelites of gender.
>men are basically the israelites of gender.
Fairly certain that's trans folks mein freund.
He will be loved by lovers of kino and lovers of truth alike.
According to my calculations, there is a .0000273% chance this isn't b8.
It's not bait. Men terrorize the earth and then scream bloody murder about misandry when a woman calls out male bias against enjoying female-centered media. You yourself probably just winced while reading "female-centered media," so you know I'm right.
>male bias
Chalking it up to bias is lazy and superficial.
It has nothing to do with bias. It's because the writing is juvenile and contrived, and the story is something a bitter teenage girl would come up with. Not only is the writer clearly a dumbass (as in low-IQ stupid), her sociopolitical agenda is so ham-fisted that it's impossible for me to view her slop as anything but propaganda.
Any guy who uses the word misandrist is chronically online and clearly has bias. No one is using that word without spending time in internet spaces made to whine about women.
>https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51751915
90% of people have bias against women. Nicpizzolatto acting like he's not one of them is rich.
It's funny he barely ratioed someone on HIS OWN account. That's weak. Most ratios I see on instagram are 20 to 1. He's only 4 to 1 on his own account with his fanboys to defend him. Seems like dj is making a fair point here. I don't give a shit about this show and never even heard of it, but why do men have to act like they have no bias against women? A show could be genuinely total shit and men will still gleefully mock it *because* it had a female lead or whatever. When a show with male characters/writers sucks ass, women don't say "see, this is why we don't diversity."
i think a lot of what you're posting is bait, but some of this is clearly true. the pre-release discussion here suggests there was a lot of people deciding to hate it based on the woman factor. I didn't watch it either, but i read some threads and their predictions about what it would be about based on that were wrong.
Who was the audience for this Lesbian Romantic Comedy?
>the pre-release discussion here suggests there was a lot of people deciding to hate it based on the woman factor.
That's what we're all agreeing on. You can hate a show all you want because you just didn't enjoy it, but MANY people have biases and don't like things for certain reasons. And many people admit this. Many people are happy to beat down something they don't like because they actually dislike the person who made it.
This shouldn't be hard to admit.
That being said, who was the intended audience for this Lesbian Romantic Comedy?
the intended audience were the people hearing the pitch. there's no audience in mind, there's 4 people in a boardroom, who think this matches on to cultural trends, seems provocative, and is laid out in a way where to bash it, invites questions of 'whats your issue with it?'
If you notice, the premise isn't the mystery, nor the theme. which seems to be peoples issue with the whole thing, they mystery was never wrapped up nicely, and took a backseat to the main characters. probably because the relationship was the premise. Show was made backwards.
What I hate about this is you have Foster, who can make an incredible role out of whatever you give her, you should let her do that. you can write a mystery and throw Foster in there and then it will be a good character thing, thats why you'd spend the money on someone like her
you're correct, and i've found watching things without knowing who made it to be beneficial to me. not knowing actor/writer/director.whatever lives really helps see things for what they are. not always possible, and you can still be fans of people, but in general, it doesn't do much to improve a piece.
to your point its really funny to watch revisionism occur once someone is outed as a bad person. suddenly 'it was always bad'
>Any guy who uses the word misandrist is chronically online and clearly has bias
I don't think it's unfair to call someone a misandrist who automatically assumes that anyone who doesn't like a show with a strong female lead and portrays white males as evil is a misogynist.
>A show could be genuinely total shit and men will still gleefully mock it *because* it had a female lead or whatever.
Some men, sure. But I don't think it's the majority.
>Possession
>Silence of the Lambs
>Through a Glass Darkly
>The Passion of Joan of Arc
>Persona
>Rosemary's Baby
All female leads, and all films that are praised on Cinemaphile.
Perhaps you're just seeing what your mind believes. But regardless, I admire your courage in posting opinions that are diametrically opposed to your average anon.
They didn't say anyone who doesn't like a show with a female lead is a misogynist. No one said that. Dismissing real conversations about sexist bias by saying "oh so anyone who dislikes a show is bad?!?" is wrong.
I used to be very anti-feminist, so I know both sides. I don't see the point in denying that mocking female media because it's female is common behavior. Even most nice men think media with a male lead is more serious and deep than a female lead.
Recently watched Red Rooms and while plot could have been or turned more interesting the female lead gave one of the best performsnces I've seen in years. People dislike forced female leads/representation and intersectional preaching badly disguised as entertainment.
There's no such thing as forced female leads. They're not any more forced than male leads.
Yes they are. If the thinking in production offices/writers room goes like "what if we made character x female so little girls can watch this and go.." instead of "wouldnt it be great to tell story x about y" then that absolutely is forced.
Go listen to some nerdist writers room podcasts, this is how these people actually work.
They do that for men and boys and you don't call that forced. Automatically making it a man and then changing it to a woman isn't any different, other than it shows bias towards seeing men as the neutral human.
What characters were females that flipped to a man. Reverse is endless. Supergirl. Batgirl. Female Sherlock Holmes. Female Mad Max. Female Luke Skywalker but Mary Sued up. Female Indiana Jones blah blah
If you have a problem with popular characters that were made for everyone getting a female spinoff after decades, you just don't like women. How could you possibly be bothered by this? I don't like any of the movies you listed and I never complained about them being men.
>What characters were females that flipped to a man.
You're proving my point. Female-led media is seen as inferior and only for women, so men want nothing to do with it.
No because they suck! They are either written as Mary Sue’s with no flaws and are boring as frick. Or they’re written as Bella Swan, plain janes that all the men desire. Women are boring as frick creative wise. Why they haven’t created shit.
If a female character has flaws, she's too "unlikable" for you.
>Women are boring as frick creative wise.
I'm glad we agree this is what men think. You were denying it at first, but I coaxed it out of you all really fricking quick.
>They do that for men and boys and you don't call that forced.
Im fairly certain they dont on anything I've watched and enjoyed since age 12. Well except for Nolan's batman trilogy perhaps. Sue me.
>If the thinking in production offices/writers room goes like "what if we made character x female so little girls can watch this and go.."
Yes, little girls need role models... also, let's make it very graphic regarding murder and nudity! Good job team!
Kek, fair point make it "so minority women can feel empowered" in this case. Same same but arguably even worse.
Male leads are natural because nobody gives a shit about women bullshit with rare exceptions. There are entire movies with no women. Go watch a movie with all women and you’d hanging yourself by the end.
>Male leads are natural because nobody gives a shit about women bullshit with rare exceptions.
This is exactly what I'm saying men think. Glad we're all in agreement now.
Not just men. Why haven’t women support all female lead Charlie Angels movie or The Marvels or recently Madam Web? We all know they went to Barbie for shirtless Gosling. Take Gosling out that movie see how well it’d done
>Why haven’t women support all female lead Charlie Angels movie
More importantly, why haven't women supported an all male lead Charlie Angels movie, so that little boy could have role models?
The Marvels is for men. Madam Web is for men (Sweeney is for men). Marvel is for men. Boom boom guns action movies are for men. Charlie's Angels is a remake (remakes suck)
You’re an idiot. All of them are covered up the entire movie. You see more skin with shirtless Gosling in Barbie than both those movies
That has nothing to do with what I said whatsoever. Do men not like pretty faces of a hot actress they like anymore? What's your point anyway? A woman has to watch a movie because it has women in it?
So then what's a movie that's ACTUALLY for women?
The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants?
Magic Mike
Bro studios literally mandate that a certain percentage of leads have to be female at this point. It's a literal quota.
Your days of being able to use this disingenuous argument are over.
Why? Because men forced male leads, and forced women out of media since the beginning? Interesting. How dare 50% of the population make up a little bit of media.
Patently false claims and quite embarrassing to state them as if they were facts.
The highest grossing film of all time (adjusting for inflation) was
gone with the wind 1939
a femal led film
You are completely delusional if you think there was a time when women weren’t involved in film production
Yeah because female led films are good.
Not in current year
>Because men forced male leads, and forced women out of media since the beginning?
When the frick did this happen?
Today. Look up the number of males working and male characters in HollyJew.
But you missing a key factor and that’s that women suck at film work clearly
The evidence ironically is the very show being discussed CsI Alaska: special victims unit
Why should people hire women to do work they aren’t good at because they are women?
>Any imbalance between two demographics is direct proof of malicious discrimination
So who is discriminating against men and stopping them from becoming Elementary School Teachers, Stenographer, etc.?
>Look up the number of males working and male characters in HollyJew.
I'm sorry are you saying the evidence of your claim is the TOTAL number of men vs. women across the ENTIRE industry?
Is it really this hard for you to admit the majority of directors and leads for goyslop movies are men?
they are majority written by women. probably why they keep bombing tbh
You didn't answer the question.
The anon you are responding to free bases bath salts
He is writing those comments on a public library computer before he slips back into the hvac ductwork for the night
None of what you posted addresses/counteracts the fact that Studios operate on insane shit like literal race & gender quotas these days and openly advertise the fact that they do.
They recognized the very real bias against these people and went to partially fix it. It's not any more forced than initially forcing them out and forcing majority men in media.
it's incredibly forced
its not forcing, its market forces. as being proven with all the shit writing and acting now. the competency crisis driven by quotas. its just proving white male excellence.
competency crisis is just a cope for mediocre white men to pretend like they're special but being kept down by The Man
Yeah because every country that’s not run by white people is clearly the best place to live, let’s list them. You start. List some countries not ran by white men that you’d rather live in.
Japan, South Korea, China, Israel. The education level (and thus ability to create a good country) has nothing to do with skin colour, it is merely economic factors compounding over a long period of time. White people just got first mover advantage by luck, then used that luck to oppress the working class of the rest of the planet and steal land, people and resources.
all of those are doing worse in every way, except maybe israel which at least has positive population growth. koreans in particular make even the most self-hating westoid seem sane by comparison.
Okay I’ll accept those countries if you’ll admit that anyone besides Asians or Israelis replacing white people in jobs that demand competency is a problem. Because surely is only Asians and Israelis that are taking these jobs right? Right?
gottem
>Japan, South Korea, China, Israel
Strangely enough all countries that are both bot brown NOR were they ever forced to adopt a large brown population...
Japan = only a good country because of investment of white men after WW2.
South Korea = only a good country because of investment of white men after Korean War.
Israel = only a good country because of the literal billions and billions of investment by white men on a continual basis since WW2.
China = is a literal shit hole ran by bug people who constantly lie about how awesome it is while they starve and kill each other for wrong think.
Oops you’re 0 for 4, thanks for playing.
>south korea
>good country
>not bug people
XAXAXAXAXAXAAX
>XAXAXAXAXAXAAX
Sorry I don’t speak maid, what does this mean?
>China
>it's not the fault of all the underqualified browns and women hired solely for their IdMisc points. It's actually the fault of....LE WHITE MALES! ...The ones we fired/now discriminate against....
>Unironically defending diversity quotas
Holy frickinh shit, Leftists.
>Dismissing real conversations about sexist bias by saying "oh so anyone who dislikes a show is bad?!?" is wrong.
But this is exactly what feminists do.
>I don't see the point in denying that mocking female media because it's female is common behavior
Neither do I, and if my ample experience on Cinemaphile serves as any indication, neither would most anons.
I gave you a list of films that are generally lauded on Cinemaphile. They all have female (in some cases "strong" female) leads. The female-driven films that generate the most criticism are the ones that portray women as good and men (usually white men) as bad - they're divisive, myopic, and often poorly written.
Listen to what feminists are actually saying instead of what men talking about feminists are saying.
Trust me, I've seen enough tweets and articles to know what feminists are saying.
Can we just agree that the writing and philosophical depth in season 1 is on a much higher level than that of season 4?
The deranged shit feminists are actually saying is usually WORSE than what men talking about feminists claim they are saying.
>2013
Argument over.
>it happened in the past so it doesn't matter
What kind of argument is this?
Of anything it just proves that feminists being completely deranged is nothing new and has been true for more than a decade.
>one little political party suggested men should pee sitting down in office toilets because men constantly make a pissy mess that janitors have to clean up
>men cut girls' clitorises off and sew their labia together
Misandry versus misogyny in a nutshell.
>one little political party
A major political party in a Western Country.
>men cut girls' clitorises off and sew their labia together
In what country? Hell, in what decade?
Are you literally complaining about shit some throwback African tribe does as "muh misogyny!" You indoctrinated dipshit?
>men cut girls' clitorises off and sew their labia together
male genital mutilation good!
female genital mutilation bad!
Yes he won, feminists have been raging morons for over a decade and have only gotten worse.
Only over a decade?
I kept my statement within the context of the evidence provided.
I pee sitting down. Am I a gay?
I can't pee sitting down because my bladder is a wierd position, where it can't fully empty unless I pee standing up.
>They didn't say anyone who doesn't like a show with a female lead is a misogynist.
That is exactly the logic that troony is operating on you disingenuous troon.
>I used to be very anti-feminist
>I posted this strawman so your argument is invalid
Why do you v-trooners come here to discuss this shit? Your kiwi farms tier gossip too deranged to be allowed on reddit where you came from?
>ad hominem attack so your argument is invalid
frick off back to plebbit tourist
That's not a "Strawman". It's an accusation of your motives.
Do you even know what a "Strawman" is or did your fat ass just overhear somebody using the word in some other argument and think you could just parrot it regardless of context when confronted?
He's right though. You're a living joke.
Black person, people who make sure to state "UMMM ACTUALLY I USED TO BE ONE OF YOU LE EVIL CHUDS BUT THEN I GOT ENLIGHTENED" before belching typical Leftshit talking-points are usually viewed as pretty suspect.
People aren't going to take you at your word on that because it's word-for-word the kind of thing an idiot would make up because he thinks it makes him sound more legitimate.
You're wasting your time. It knows that. It doesn't care.
>incel-speak
>le n word because I'm le badass
anon from his mom's basement everyone
>he doesn't call people Black folk to their face in public
every day I wish someone would give me an excuse to kill them, but they never take the bait
>incel-speak
Mosts incels are self-identified leftists so "incel-speak" would logically be your leftist Tumblr drivel.
>n word
Imagine unironically being afraid to type-out a word.
Who gives a frick you copeing shit the show sucked and that’s what is being talked about not somewhere out there someone did a muhsoggyknees possible
Get off my board
Rosemary's baby is an interesting one to point out, because i bet there's a lot of people who would like it for very stupid trad reasons, oblivious to its subversion. honestly you watch that movie with any women and there will be a part where she'll sigh because she knows talking to men is useless sometimes.
great movie though. but this is about a woman writing a thing with women in it. not women main characters being well done.
Incidentally, Silence of the Lambs what you're thinking best. Clarice isn't taken seriously, she's even sent to get information on the premise she'd be disarming. She's also a trainee, which is only done as a form of bait (and in the books, a way for the FBI do do something like this that wouldn't look great on paper) Thomas Harris understood bias against women, and didn't shy away from it, but rather used it to make a compelling character
I agree with everything you said, and you're actually reinforcing my point.
You can portray women as oppressed to some degree. You can have white men act like self-entitled buttholes. You can have a powerful female lead that slays her male counterparts. But if it's a poorly written propaganda piece that draws a bright line between men and women (oppressors vs. the oppressed) it's probably not going to be well-received.
i agree, i wasn't trying to argue, just adding why i thought it wasn't the full story. I also think if Silence came out now, this board would have a shallow reaction to it.
But yes, when these things are heavy handed they are bad, and I think so much of that is the tendency to make the audience do the heavy lifting of trying to be on the same page as the writer, rather than bringing the audience to the writer. if that makes sense.
Simpsons did it succinctly when they had lisa be good at a sport and she took off the mask and declared she was a woman, and expected gasps, but the trope was so overdone so the other kids were just like 'cool, we're glad you're on the team'
>I also think if Silence came out now, this board would have a shallow reaction to it
I disagree
Clarice was strong but vulnerable, and the white males she encountered were a very mixed bag.
>make the audience do the heavy lifting of trying to be on the same page as the writer, rather than bringing the audience to the writer
Exactly! It's about persuading the viewer through the strength of your logic, the authenticity and originality of your story, and making sure the technical elements of your film/show (acting, cinematography, etc) are going to add up tona compelling story.
>you can’t use the word “misandrist” because I’m a moron that uses only the most popular leftyhomosexual words
Whatever dumbass, why don’t you cope like a little b***h somewhere else? Like Reddit, where you can go back to.
>Any guy who uses the word misandrist is chronically online and clearly has bias
But not anyone who uses the word "misogynist", right? Using that word instead means they are educated and smart and correct, right?
Look at published writing and tell me the amount of times the word misandry versus misogyny appears.
>Reality & Truth are defined by what the establishment allows to be published
Holy fricking SHIT we have an unironic cultist here, folks.
No, he was denying that misandry is a chronically online word, while claming misogyny is not an educated word. You can be very well read and spend no time online, and you would know the term misogyny.
>No, he was denying that misandry is a chronically online word, while claming misogyny is not an educated word.
Which is correct and anyone who not a hypocritical feminist cultist desperately trying to shape the narrative knows it.
this really only makes sense if you've never spent time with women. Months ago I hired my ex to help out at a club i worked at, she's like a star in the hospitality business. makes a crazy amount of money because she's good. This new club had this totally new service staff, and everything she would say they'd go check with me, even after i told them to just do what she says, she knows more than me.
At one point they weren't sure what to do with huge order, she tells them what to do and they are just standing there and hand me the order. I'm like 'yeah just do that' she loudly said 'yeah i get it, i'm a woman' but she was right, that is the only reason they didn't move.
Cool anecdote on shit that never happened, homosexual.
The point remains that you don't get to legitimize "your" word while delegitimizing your opposition's based on your personal feelings.
And then everybody clapped
its a real story and i hated it, and really tried to downplay it because my ex was such a fricking c**t b***h narcissist. it was still a moment though. this isn't remotely unbelievable for the service industry either
you're their boss?
i was a boss, but the owners were the real bosses, and one of the owners basically just hired his family of crazy hot cousins and i just had no control over anything. i could train them but then he'd override whatever i did. the whole thing was nightmare thats why i brought in my ex for a huge event.
so it was a group of crazy hot women that knew eachother being bossed around by a new dominant crazy hot women which they resented so they played passive-aggressive games. it didnt have anything to do with men, it was a toxic female social dynamic thing.
hmmm yeah i guess that does make sense, i can't think of an argument here. she also bartended with me and we made way more money (for the company, we pooled it all) and showed everyone else up and i think that rubbed the women bartenders the wrong way
yeah now i remember them not serving food to who she was helping and i had to keep going to the kitchen and ask what was going on, and they were just giving meals to their tables... i told her about the situation and she said 'i really don't give a shit what happens here'
>i could train them but then he'd override whatever i did. the whole thing was nightmare
sounds like the unskilled and low paid wagies of a mismanaged business deferred to their boss and trainer. very normal
well their boss said to defer to her, so they weren't listening
Do this for yourself to avoid innevitable suicide. Imagine telling your father what you are doing right. Genuinely picture his face as you recount your actions.
there was a BBC radio science segment about girls and boys in group projects. The female scientist found that boys compete by contributing to the project, while girls compete by spending the first 30 minutes-hour figuring out who is their friend and who is their enemy, then fighting over the project contributions along those lines.
nice devil gets. i guess i was trying to prove my ex didn't care about shit like that but she's an anomaly because the rest behaved that way
were her index fingers shorter than her ring fingers or about even?
was she a little bit autistic?
You have never held gainful employment nor spoken to a woman you aren't related to for more than minute, let alone worked with a woman.
>Do my job? But, like, doing the sole thing I am paid to do is hard... Do I really have to?
>Can I go home early and foist my work onto others? I have a headache...
you are describing women from 18- 23 who sleep all day. women statistically have the most multiple jobs. i for instance, i am a man and would never have two jobs. my female friends are are doing two jobs and going to school. i simply lie and say i have a degree. early 20s girls are the laziest people you can ever meet, but then they switch into needlessly dramatically workaholics
Online influencer and Starbucks coffee pourer aren’t jobs.
starbucks is certainly a job.
>Literally mandated quotas
>It isn't forced
This is your brain on Leftism.
Oceania, Eurasia, etc.
If you call it forced, it's only equally as forced as the original strucutre that put majority men in. It's not forced, they just want women in there.
the original "structure" was Competency, going against Competency is forcing.
>It's not "forced" to literally mandate a number of women be hired....because the people forcing it want women to be hired.
This HAS to be bait.
The original structure was creating it
Lol your prompting communism without realizing it because your low iq
>it's only equally as forced as the original strucutre that put majority men in.
There were no mandates literally requiring that a specific percentage of employees be male.
That's the difference.
>it's only equally as forced as the original strucutre that put majority men in
I love how this is basically an admission that your beliefs are literally just as bad as the historical "misogynists" you're denigrating.
You're admitting to discrimination based on sex....but it's OK because YOU'RE doing it... Of course.
Why would I give a shit how many times the heavily curated media that gets published uses a word?
That's not what legitimizes or delegitimizes a word or concept. Reality is.
Are you unironically admitting to letting the mass-media dictate your world-view MORE than reality?...
something something power imbalance, punching up, long history of oppression against women, it's ok when we do it, etc.
Trust me, they have plenty of excuses for why they aren't hypocrites.
someone who cares about and documents twitter ratios is chronically online therefore ick and is to be ignored. icknored.
>Femishits
>accusing anyone else of being "chronically online"
Lol don't you spend literal hours defending every new Wokegay Star Wars or Marvel Movie that comes out?
>your word bad!
>my word good!
stick it up your ass troony
>i'm le bipocurious neurodivergent anti-colonizer-anti fascist cumpositive gayfriendly dipshittius
>UHh did you just use a real word to describe people who frequently say "I hate men"??? Terminally online brain rot.....
Show breasts with time stamp or gtfo
Your bait is weak
Many men straight up admit to not liking female media, but when you repeat what the men just said, now it's not ok.
Its a real mystery as to why that is.
That's right I'm a man and I'm powerful. You are inferior because of your sex
>nicpizzolatto sounds way too angry.
No shit! He created a masterpiece and then watch people take repeated shits on it.
You sound like a troony because you probably are one.
Literally who, >eceleb, gay, etc
>literally who
Wrong board
I support the Pizza internet rampage. They took his great to okay meme show and made it unwatchable
>goes from running prestige tv to shitposts that no one sees
BASED OMG
I've only ever seen season 2. Season 1 was too hyped by Cinemaphile and then and season 2 they started making Black folk the main character
*after season two
I watch s02 for she
More like Nic /misc/zolatto.
Wtf I love pizza now.
I already did for making certified kino of the highest order
is he working right now? seems like it would be wise to wait for the dust to settle before jumping onto social media to shit on someone else's stuff. I get why he's irritated, and even justified but its such a bad calculation for his career.
I was thinking the same thing. Not only would he be wise to avoid social media altogether, he should cool it with the chan lingo. Revealing one's power level before acquiring frick-you money is a big mistake.
lol he's probably drunk. Considering what people have said he sucks to work with, so this is really not a good move. people will opt to work for someone who makes good stuff, over someone who makes great stuff but makes your life shit. it also seems like it was more than him who made s1 good, and writers are pretty undervalued in the first place.
Imagine having a career in an industry that’s imploding under the weight of its own hubris
thankfully there are people like him who aren't dickless little homosexuals who care what other people think (like you.) have a nice day.
Every time I think I can’t like him more he goes and becomes a little bit more likeable.
S2 was always good. I never saw S3 but I'm sure it's watchable compared to Night Country
Please don't compare Night Country and True Detective, it's like comparing a pile of shit crawling with maggots to a delicious home cooked meal made with the finest most nutricious ingredients imaginable by someone who deeply loves you and wants to nourish you.
cared enough to reply
I will watch everything he’s involved with now.
It’s fake. Every media account is saying Pizzolatto has been reposting other people’s negative reviews but nothing on him actually replying. Person made this over did it by making him sound way to much /misc/
It's real, though. Just go to Nic Pizza's instagram account, look at the latest post, and check the comments. You might have to be logged in to see the comments, though
i skipped season 4 and watched Mare of Easttown instead and now i'm on a crusade to convince Cinemaphile that it's season 4 in spirit
Agreed
You forgot to mention that unhinged comment was made on a post Nic made to honor his wife on Valentine's Day.
He never responded. Response is fake. He hasn’t personally responded at all instead done passive aggressive thing and reposted other people’s negative responses to season 4
its mentally deranged to comment on someone's valentine post with dumb shit about a show you know he doesn't want to think about. TV can be great, but its never this important
Checked but it's mentally deranged to make a valentine's post on social media in the first place. People need to stop posting personal shit on the internet.
That's literally the point of the "Social" in "Social-Media".
That's literally why social media should be erased.
i agree, but that speaks to a larger problem that i can't blame someone for not making a stand on. he's kinda stuck here because he uses social media and sort of famous so its an easy point grab.
Night c**try sucked though
One reason men can't deny their bias against female media is because women experience this bias against female media too. Women themselves are taught to feel that male is the neutral, male is the main character, male is more serious, male is better. Women realize they were taught this way. And then men deny they feel that way? Goofy.
Dude I agree with you but the new season was shit because of other reasons. If anything Jodie Foster tried her hardest to make it work
I agree (even if you are trolling I suspect), but men are orders of magnitude more animated and interested in the world than women. It's an undeniable fact which is why it's difficult to write great female characters, they are simply too dull in reality.
It's difficult to write female characters because of the way women are judged. A man who is confident, cool, morally grey, badass, emotional, anything... is seen as stuck up, b***hy, horrible, manly, whatever if she's a woman.
Men are better at writing female characters than women are. Look at most iconic female characters, all by men
Just think of a man, and take away reason and accountability.
Women can be written as confident, cool, morally grey, badass, emotional, anything just as easily as men. Narcissist nepobaby terrible writers choose to write them as stuck up, b***hy, horrible, manly and when no-one likes their bad job they try and emotionally manipulate weak and submissive people like you into pretending they are the same thing.
You know this but your cult demands dishonesty.
>Narcissist nepobaby terrible writers choose to write them as stuck up, b***hy, horrible, manly and when no-one likes their bad job they try and emotionally manipulate weak and submissive people like you into pretending they are the same thing.
I'm glad we agree this is how you feel about them.
I'm glad you'll commit suicide in the next decade. I'm not going to let you sidestep it, though, you dishonest shell of human. Deny it in detail or admit I am right through inaction.
Because it doesn't fit reality, most women are literally so robotic in their daily life and have little to no interest in anything beyond their own personal space or impact that it's hard to write characters that could be gender neutral in writing and then cast them as female. It just comes of as silly in the vast majority of cases because it clashes with reality. TV is exaggerated personalities but good TV makes it less obvious you are being tricked.
Now up that by 10x to write a character like say Rust from S1, it's fantasy land but somewhat plausible. A women in that role? It clashes with the fundamental reality of how animated the average woman is in reality.
>most women are literally so robotic in their daily life
I'm glad we agree this is how you feel about women.
>blaming society for the fact that indoctrinated feminists can't write female characters that aren't annoying
>blaming society for the fact that indoctrinated feminists can't write well in general
Yes, it's society's fault people think the characters you write are dogshit.
"Misandrist" isn't 'chan lingo'. It's existed for as long as misogonist has, it's just for whatever reason women really latched onto using the latter as an insult, meanwhile the former has fallen out of usage with men. But now that modern women are starting to show their true nature, and men are becoming increasingly annoyed or dissapointed by it, it's becoming more popular. Especially when women start throwing out their usual assortment of unwarranted insults.
him muttering 'muh' is the chan lingo, nobody outside of Cinemaphile does that
Imagine engaging with an obvious shill
If he was going to say anything he should have said
>the new show was terrible
and ask her how much she was getting paid
The only good part of True Detective was the first 3/4d of the first season. Ending sucked
>hurr durr im too good for lovecraft ending hurr durr
Frick you
S1 is goated at times, but meh at others. S2 is “laugh at” not “laugh with” funny and is a meme machine. S3 keeedz. This one sucks.
>Make shit but put a woman in it
>Get called shit
>"MUH SOGY-NY!!!"
Why are Leftists so repetitive and so stupid? Is it the same reason they're always so fat?
>There are ACTUAL, unironic """male feminist""" soi-chuggers here on Cinemaphile unironically trying to convince people that this TD Fanfiction wasn't absolute shit
>They are unironically ITT, belching typical Internet-Feminist drivel about how "Misogyny" is le everywhere but "Misandrany" le doesn't exist
Holy shit
it's just a mentally zoomer addicted to (You)
mental illness likely
same kind of c**t catfishing people on FB and dating apps
yes the antifa trannies are real
homie SHIEEEEEEETTT, OOHHHHHHHHH
This thread started with men denying it, but then they got baited and started screaming admissions that they dislike women in tv because they don't like women in real life.
Genius.
It’s true I dislike women
They disgust me
but
Films like fried green tomatoes and silence of the lambs are absolute kino
why do you find it acceptable in Silence?
I’m not sure I understand the question
SotL is great movie that gave us a very relatable female character
i was just wondering what makes that one better in your mind. I agree with you she's relatable but you said you dislike woman. as a straight man i don't so i was wondering what you found to work
agent starling isn't a bad ass
She’s isolated and out of her depths through the whole film
treading water in a pool of absolutely unimaginable deprivation that is completely alien to most people including her
This makes her vulnerable and she’s fully aware of this but she continues on because she is unaware of the possibility the glass won’t always be there
yeah i would say that's a good synopsis, and great analysis. Her strength isn't that she confidently flies in the face of authority, but rather has to prove herself to the FBI in a way completely exposed. Yeah. Will Graham doesn't have the same experience because his development is is more that he's reluctant to partake in the whole ordeal. It's an interesting thing because i don't think you can make Clarice a man, or Will a woman.
crazy, unprofessional, pretentious .... he's still the king
that jacket is frickin SICK
i they made it about natives purely to create more reviews that would inevitably be positive. nobody even watches it
Anyone who isn’t an npc know those “reviews” are tainted
Kali Reis and her mother are pretendians
>The human geneticist Bryan Sykes (1947–2020) wrote, "On the matrilineal side, all of the mDNA lineages are of either European or African origin, while the patrilineal Y chromosomes show a range of Native American, European, and African lineages plus one surprise from New Guinea." He continued that "genealogical reconstruction showed that the single Native American Y chromosome was most likely introduced into the tribe by a Cherokee incomer several generations back." He wrote further: "In contrast, the complete absence of Native American mDNA among the Seaconke Wampanoag came as a great surprise to me, given the usual direction of intermarriage between African and European American incomers and Native American women."
That’s ovously because she’s black
And her “tribe” are a bunch of black people that escaped from Baltimore that larp as Indians for the premiere gibs but the government denies them all the time
Kek
bump
Tell what some iconic women characters written by women. Frick, Foster’s most iconic roles were written and directed by men
Fat misandrist neckbeard womanchilds need to learn to accept criticism. Your show sucked. take the L.
Holy shit based Nic goes nuclear. His run may have been dogshit too but he is going full based.
Season four was the BEST season. Strong female leads. A story that made sense and didn’t leave me confused like seasons 1,2,3 did. Powerhouse acting for the ladies in this season. Great change- it’s time we had more
Female led shows. Best ever season! Cannot change my mind and laughing at my comment won’t do it either. Keep your (yous)
Why is a comment like this impossible to be non-ironic here? Are we truly that red pilled or is it that women are literally braindead moronic and don't ever visit this site?
even the "redpilled" women i know (autistic losers and druggies) hate Cinemaphile
a lot of them grew up during the tumblr era and it was cool to hate on Cinemaphile then and they never moved on
Because it's too obviously bait.
Riddle me this, misandrists. If season 4 was good, why did no one watch it??
Women suck. b***h still can’t tell me all the great characters created by women. In fact, artistically what have women created even close to men? Fricking nothing. Why they have infest everything men created and enjoyed. This show is a perfect example. Nobody even be talking about season 4 of it was a it’s own original miniseries. Doubt Foster would have even signed on
Got a real doozy over here chief, buncha fellas got themselves into some kind of a corpsicle.
>"Emperor's new clothes rocked... but that is probably hard for you to see because you're blinded by your horrible misogony and massive ego."
Nic you frickin goober we know ure here
someone spoil me the entire plot of S4
i dont really wanna watch it, but im kind of curious about the story
Every season of True Detective after 1 has been dogshit
Rust's character development was so 1 dimensional compared to the complexities involved with Navarro.
literally who?
wait, are there actual femoids itt? I just cant imagine a fully functional male defending this garbage or "you dont like it because women" logic
They only work 75% as many hours per week as men do. They're just lazy womanchildren.
just in case the ai chatbot needs a link to read the post.
what?
Explain what you don't understand if you are a human. Just saying
>bleep blorp does not compute
>you are le crazy I will not say why because I am not programmed to, though
without specifying is an admission of being a bot
this is offset because they are also raising children, and they have multiple part time jobs
Most women these days aren't raising children. Even the few that shit out kids are just sticking an ipad in front of them and being narcissists
based (and redpilled)
I hope it’s worth it for him because this is him nuking his career in the film industry. He’ll be working for Newsmax by the end of the month.
Didn't realize Pizza is so based. Will support in the future.
>read thread
>hit Shillcon 5
The correction coming for leftists is going to be so hilarious
>muh
We won bros we did it!