>No, you CANNOT include references to deceased actors in your film...

>No, you CANNOT include references to deceased actors in your film... because y-you just CAN'T okay?!?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But when Disney does it for Star Wars, it's brave and powerful, right?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      It was pathetic, but it helps if people were actually honest about why they hated it.
      They don't hate the idea of bringing dead actors back, they hate that a shitty film did it.
      Case in point: [...], these same people probably creamed their pants when Carrie Fisher or Peter Cushing showed up in Star Wars. Even Marvel did this without major backlash.

      No, it's shit and Tarkin/Leia coming back in Rogue One completely tanks its worth as a Star Wars movie

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They were the only good parts you pedantic frick

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Holy cope batman

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Carrie Fisher wasn't dead yet when Rogue One came out, she lived for 11 days after that. So they weren't trying to CGI a dead Carrie as Leia, just a young one

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This, however...

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What they did there was not CGI, but yes it was weird and they shouldn't have done it, they should have tweaked Last Jedi so she died somewhere then

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But could she legally and morally consent?
            Or was she just a dementia'd old crack fiend that sign away her soul if it got her some more powder.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was pretty pathetic coattail riding you gotta be real

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was pathetic shill

      It was pathetic, but it helps if people were actually honest about why they hated it.
      They don't hate the idea of bringing dead actors back, they hate that a shitty film did it.
      Case in point:

      But when Disney does it for Star Wars, it's brave and powerful, right?

      , these same people probably creamed their pants when Carrie Fisher or Peter Cushing showed up in Star Wars. Even Marvel did this without major backlash.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I remember when Galaxy chocolate did an advert with Audrey Hepburn with CGI in the UK and the media were banging on about how it's cool and amazing actually

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >honest about why they hated it.
        it's crass, crude, disrespectful, lame, and ugly. in all cases.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol, what kind of people you think watches nuWars?
        People with integrity?

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was pathetic shill

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IT IS FRICKING DISGUSTING, IT WAS DISGUSTING IN THE LAST ACTION HERE, IT WAS DISGUSTING IN DEAD MEN DONT WEAR PLAID, IT WAS DISGUSTING IN ROGUE ONE, ITS DISGUSTING IN THE FLASH, ITS ALWAYS FRICKING GROSS AND DISGUSTING YOU EMOTIONLESS CHIIIIIILD, YOU STUNTED, IDIOT BOYY

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was really fricking cool and, I hate the flash.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bringing dead people back with CGI is peak member berries, a dead actor should stay dead and just be nothing but good memories. Learning to move on from death is a valuable lessons you gotta learn.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >references

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    apparently they didn't even ask for permission

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's fricking Warner for you.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's fricking Warner for you.

      Thank god their stupid movie tanked.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They shouldn't be allowed to use a likeness without signed authorization from the families.
      They also need to ensure they have to get authorized each time, I really don't like the idea of a future in which studio's can buy the likeness of a dead actor, and then prostitute them out in perpetuity regardless of whatever that person may have ever wanted.
      >example
      Muhammad Ali's son sells his father's likeness to "Oscar Mayer" Now the company uses the likeness of a dead Muslim boxer to sell hotdogs and pork sausages.
      Or it's just something more blatant, licensing the use of dead celebs in porno's and such without their consent when they where alive.
      It's just virtual reality slavery.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not even true. Reeve's estate gave the greenlight for it, as did Adam West's. George Reeves literally doesn't even have any living next of kin.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wow. An article I actually agree with!
    That's new...

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oh no I get to live on forever in cgi. Literally every actor would love this since they are all massive attention prostitutes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That said you should probably like, pay the families or something. Aren't CGI recreations part of actors contracts nowadays?

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Actors barely qualify as humans, so there is nothing wrong with that.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not only was Reeve the best Superman, he was the best representation of a superhero ever. imagined getting mogged by a dead CGI actor. flash is moronic anyway.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no kevin conroy
    cringe.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Flash was a fine, dumb fun film up until the final act. Then the reveal that he's been trying for like 50 years to win one fight. That was dumb.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's better than what Doctor Who did - recast actors from the past and replace their images on all their merch with the new recast actor like as if they never existed

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *