>"NOOO YOU CANT HAVE HER FIGHT WHILE PREGNANT!"
It's a cartoon. Common sense doesn't apply here. Wanna know why Batman doesn't use a gun? Author narrative. Author narrative overrides common sense. It's fiction.
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>It's a cartoon.
One that expects the audience to take what's happening seriously. You can't use that excuse when you face backlash for adding in dumb shit.
This happens constantly. If heroes operated on common sense, Batman would use a gun. Know why he doesn't?
Author narrative.
Batman not using a gun isn't the same thing as crime-fighting while pregnant. I'm not arguing this any further. Stop being a contrarian. It doesn't make you interesting.
>It's different because it just is okay!?
That's......literally my entire POINT. ALL choices made about characters are for author narrative. How does what you're saying here counter anything I've said?
One puts a baby in danger you actual brainlet, and if the writers wanted her to at least appear to have more empathy than a literal crackhead on the streets, she'd ensure her child isn't anywhere near a combat zone you dense moron
She has super human healing abilities and shoots webs. Calm down.
Her baby is still just a fetus, though. It's acceptable to put yourself in danger if you want to, but putting your unborn baby in danger is reckless and irresponsible.
Anons brought up Batman and guns. I'm okay with Bruce having his own moral code on that matter. It's what he believes in due to his childhood trauma, so it's his choice to work the way he does. However, it can get annoying when he tries to persuade other people into fighting crime without guns, too. I can understand why he would do that, but I don't think he's morally on the right in those debates.
if batman were serious he'd open several gyms across the city as bruce wayne and triple the amount of police
Batman is literally filled to the brim with dumb shit and they're always meant to be taken seriously by the audience, except for the 60s show. Most capeshit is.
Pregnant Damsel-in-Distress is better.
A combat centric woman turned damsel in distress due to pregnancy and then turns back again into a combat mom after the birth is the best of all worlds
Where did you hear that moronic shit, anon? Frick no, at best they might have defended themselves in a raid and modern Hollywood turned that into them going on attacks themselves
I'll take "Suspension of Disbelief" for $400 Alex
Didn't Viking women fight while pregnant?
Do your see any Vikings running around this days?
what was the point though besides one single scene? its never brought up again and doesn't really add to her character at all.
>It's a cartoon
no, it's a fetish
>no, it's a fetish
Not even a good one at that. There's plenty of pregnancy fetish kino out there and this isn't one of them.
her pregancy being the focus of only one joke scene tells you it isn't a fetish, idiots.
I can buy a muscled up man fighting without a gun. I can't buy a pregnant woman fighting. Have you dealt with anyone pregnant, anon? They're not going to even be bending much if they're far enough along to have a visible stomach, let alone fight.
Not to mention Jesus Christ you're literally putting a baby in danger, one kick to the stomach and you'll have a superhero named The Amazing Stillborn.
>you'll have a superhero named The Amazing Stillborn.
OP's take is aggressively brainlet. That said, Spiderfetus would presumably have the same powers as it's mother, so it's plausible that it's a bit more durable than the average fetus.
Still a dumb idea-sorry Author Narrative, though.
I've dealt with a pregnant lady like her. Could she fight? Listen bud, she had radioactive blood.
>I can't buy a pregnant woman fighting.
I can because my dad is a police officer and he's arrested pregnant women for clobbering the shit out of each other.
Shit like this is especially harmful because it's pushing dumb real-life narratives
>Women stronk! Even the pregnant ones!
Except we know there's nothing more helpless and vulnerable than a pregnant woman
>NOOOO YOU CANT HAVE A BLACKFACE IN A LOONEY TUNES CARTOON THAT’S RACIST!
It's a cartoon. Common sense doesn't apply here. Wanna know why Batman doesn't use a gun? Author narrative. Author narrative overrides common sense. It's fiction.
The only real issue is that she is in the field for no reason. She is shown to be perfectly capable of delegating and commanding other Spiders for their day to day business and there is an infinite amount of them. Getting pulled in during a big emergency while all the other Spider people are locked out of a universe and having to make a tough choice and fight even though you are carrying a kid would make some sense and maybe be a cool character moment maybe but no.
Chasing black Peter is fine as he wouldn't try to hurt hurt her or the kid
>Chasing black Peter is fine as he wouldn't try to hurt hurt her or the kid
She got her back slammed to a truck after she was "beaten" by Miles. She better get some scans after that, Demon Spot will frick her shit up in the next movie.
>yfw spot just reaches in there and yanks out the baby
I’m more concerned with her continuously riding a motorcycle.
It's horribly irresponsible
what if she ran out of webs and launched the baby out of her vegana and the baby used its spider power to cling to the wall and she pulled herself up by the umbillical cord
new copypasta just dropped
It's not that it's illogical, it's that it's moronic
Shill.
You and people defending this are being moronic for the sake of being moronic.
that's just grossly irresponsible to an absurd degree.
this is what happens when you let leftist right a story common sense goes out the window
It’s a Spider-Baby, they’ll be fine
I don't get why she said this. Do women like it when you ask them to adopt you?
>I don't get why she said this
motherless behavior
Gwen just wants mommy milkies
Batman not choosing guns cause he wants to hurt, not kill criminals makes sense. Jessica fighting while her baby looks ready to pop out doesn't. Babies already get fricked up if a woman runs too much while pregnant, I can't even imagine the shit that'd happen doing even a handful of things Jessica did during the movie. It's one thing to make Batman not use guns, it's an entirely different thing to expect us to believe that baby is going to be born without defects.
There's an extensive and prominent explanation of why Batman doesn't use guns in the series
Kids should not watch movies that promote child endangerment, don't care what else you have to say - I'm going to dedicate myself to making Spider-Man-related content that upholds life, as a Catholic
>Kids should not watch movies that promote child endangerment, don't care what else you have to say - I'm going to dedicate myself to making Spider-Man-related content that upholds life, as a Catholic
NTA but Spider-Man started his career as a kid. Maybe find another hero to make content about?
>Common sense doesn't apply here. Wanna know why Batman doesn't use a gun? Author narrative.
yeah, but batman isn't carrying around an unborn child in his body.
Instead, Batman did the next best thing by having an underage child as his partner in crime.
>the next best thing
the next best thing would be carrying around an infant.
Does her super powers prevent the baby's brain from getting scrambled from all the movement?
Why does she get shit and not Peter B?
>Wanna know why Batman doesn't use a gun?
He's mentally scared from his parents deaths.
>It's a cartoon
Funny how this is a valid excuse the second it's needed to justify some new mental illness, but a light skinned hispanic voicing a tanned hispanic is a step too far to these people, it stops being just a cartoon at that point. Bad faith and twitter morons, such an iconic duo.
Where's this argument for "outrageous" costumes