>"Now don't lie to me, Anon. I know you watch interrogation breakdown videos and imagine you're the one getting interviewd by the police."
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
>"Now don't lie to me, Anon.
>implying I would ever consent to an interview
Uh, yeah. Don't mess with me because I basically know the law and could ruin your freaking life...
they can still detain you and if you resist you are getting an ass beating
I think I'd just become like that good doctor gay but instead of screaming about being a surgeon I'd just be asking for a lawyer. crying and throwing up and screaming until a nice older woman lawyer with big milkies came in to make it all better for her special baby boy(me). that's how I'd win.
I would commit any crime if I knew this is the sequence of events that would follow afterwards
>Ends up getting a fat balding middle aged israelite with a nose that could poke your eye out
at least then you would know you'll be getting the best possible defense
How to win police interrogation:
Step 1: I want a lawyer
Step 2: say nothing else
Easy.
more like how to make sure you will lose if your case ever gets to court
all the prosecutor has to do is point out you refuse to talk to the police and asked for a lawyer
innocent people aren't scared to talk to the police
this is bad bait it's literally illegal for them to do that
>it's literally illegal for them to do that
No it's not.
And it doesn't matter if it's your right to have a lawyer.
The morons that will decide if you're guilty or not think exactly like this and they will find you guilty
And the jury will give zero fricks about it because they also think that innocent people aren't scared of the police
How do you explain Rittenhouse not being found guilty?
The frick does that have to do with it?
He fully cooperated with police.
white
Lmao
He exercised his fifth amendment right you dumb frick. The prosecutor literally accused him of remaining silent, got shut down by the judge, and no this did not cause the jury to convict him of being le sinister silent killer of activist.
i member
>And the jury will give zero fricks about it because they also think that innocent people aren't scared of the police
And then the judge does his job and advises the jury on the fact that what they're doing won't pass, because the law says so.
Whose law?
Trial by peers b***h, we are the law
laaaaaaaaw!
Cope, what you are saying is demonstrably false. People refuse to talk to cops all the fricking time and it is not held against them at all, you are dumb as frick.
you can waive your right to a jury trial, and have the judge decide instead
derek chauvin and his lawyer were morons for not doing this
It's Illegal For You To Ask Me That
Only if you affirmatively invoke your right to remain silent/specifically tell them you do wish to speak to police. If you just stay quiet and refuse to answer their questions, they can use that against you in court.
And all my lawyer would have to do is point out that you can't use a person's fith ammendment rights as proof of guilt.
What's hilarious is that most people unironically believe this which is how the vast majority of crimes get solved. Probably why the reason why public schools have fingerprint taking days and days for army recruiters to come talk to the children and lots of rhetoric about the holocaust but simply not enough time to educate children on their civil rights as US citizens facing down law enforcement. Imagine how even more useless the cops would become if every dumb Black person in the country suddenly realized they can simply not tell on themselves
maybe this is for the best
Name anybody in society that sees a net benefit from "civil rights". You can't, because society is zero sum. You always have more enemies than friends so if something is "good for everyone", it is volumetrically bad for everyone since more enemies than friends see benefits from it, ergo anything that's everyone's right is actually an opportunity for more people to do you harm.
This. Society should equally shit on everyone like under communism, because by harming everyone equally, each individual wins exactly as much as everyone else is harmed, meaning the amount of good done is infinite.
>volumetrically
Didn't the lawyer try to do this with Rittenhouse and the judge went apeshit then he won?
No, Rittenhouse cooperated with the police the prosecutor tried to do this when it came to his own questions that Rittenhouse took the 5th.
see above
you're wrong
And you're an even bigger moron because we're talking about the right to a lawyer which is the 6th not the 5th
wrong
Fricking ace backpedal
>you can be silent but NO LAWYERS
Fyi Rittenhouse had lawyers too you dipshit, anyone who is found innocent ever gets a lawyer.
What backpedal? You don't even know the difference between the right to not incriminate yourself with testimony and the right to counsel.
The moronic post that started everything was
which is someone exercising their right to legal counsel.
How is he wrong didn't you say that it isn't in your rights? I don't think I'm understanding what your saying.
>I don't think I'm understanding what your saying.
That's normal you're probably sub 80 IQ.
Oh I didn't see he said the civil part. It can't be held against you no matter what?
Also if you ask for a lawyer and you don't have one do they have to provide one if you aren't in court?
>DON'T GET BRAZEN WITH ME
It was kino.
In the USA at least prosecutors are not allowed to hold refusal to answer against the accused.
It would go against "You have the right to remain silent".
In criminal cases that is.
In civil cases refusal to answer may be used against you.
based moron doesn't even know the difference between the 5th and 6th
armchair lawyers are being pedantic, but the real answer is simple.
you deny any wrongdoing, ask for a lawyer to be present, and clearly state your refusal to answer any questions without your lawyer being present.
then you can plead the fifth all you want, you don't plead the fifth without doing those things.
This is actually the fricked up heinous part of the Cosby case. The sequence of events was first he had a flimsy accusation from basketball Black person and so was promised no criminal prosecution so they could compel testimony in a civil case (as DAs knew they couldn't win a criminal case). Then the next DA comes in and uses that compelled civil testimony to criminally prosecute cosby.
Nice try pig but I watched Better Call Saul
FYI, cops can and do lie with impunity, even under oath. They are armed tax collectors and traitors.
Hello, officer.
Griffin error bro, that's a mistrial
They did that during the Rittenhouse trial and the judge chewed them out on it. The fourth amendment exists for a reason.
What? innocent people get fricked plenty of times. The police are trained to probe and trick you.
>Glowing this bright
Prosecutors using your invocation of the 5th amendment is a great way for them to get butt fricked by an angry judge.
What if the judge isn't impartial?
It's up to your lawyer to leverage that in your favor.
Basically outside of calling a misstrial I don't see what the defence can do
>your honor the prosecution is violating the fifth amendment
>lol blow it out your ass, the innocent have nothing to fear
>*jury nods in Cardassian*
homie do you know what the fifth amendment is? If a prosecutor brings up the defendant choosing to not speak to police or to a lawyer as evidence it's a speedrun to mistrial. The only thing I can think of causing a mistrial faster is bringing up jury nullification.
FIIIIIIIF
Thank you Tyrone Glowe you are my greatest ally
>I am invoking my sixth amendment right to an attorney. I am invoking my fifth amendment right to silence.
and then shut up. Totally unambiguous.
wrong on all counts
this is my go to police video
>Heh if you have nothing to hide then speak goy
Once you're done licking the pigs boots can you clean mine with your tongue? They're quite dirty
why would i lick some Black folk boots?
I can just call the cops to kill you
>prosecutor has to do is point out you refuse to talk to the police and asked for a lawyer
literally why the 5th exists, to prevent people from being forced to incriminate themselves without proper legal representation. Refusal to speak cannot be used against you in a court of law, while even if you are innocent saying the wrong thing can be used against you.
Anyway I too have responded to this bait, well done anon enjoy your (you)s
>Anyway I too have responded to this bait, well done anon enjoy your (you)s
SAME AS IT EVER WAS
sorta. you're going to jail while you wait for that lawyer. and i hope you memorized their number to call collect from a phone. if you're getting a free lawyer expect a plea to serve some time. hopefully you got arrested around friends/family so they can call a lawyer while you're being processed.
>Easy.
look, im trying to give you the opportunity to tell your side of this. you dont want people to think you are demonic. I know you aren't, hell I've even thought of killing my horrible parents. I get it man, it was an accident.
They made this a sigh of guilt in my country
I’m British. Refusing to answer questions can now be used in court against you
Good. That's how it should be. If the government isn't a police state nobody will ever take them seriously. Now if the bong cops could just carry firearms and shoot minorities you would have a perfect society, just like back in 1776.
you're deepthroating the boot at this point, bugman
in my country as well
>want
Not assertive enough. The police can continue to withhold access to a lawyer legally if you only say you "want" to talk to one. I forget which case this was but it actually happened.
You're probably thinking of "lawyer dog" and his request was vague.
“I know that I didn't do it, so why don't you just give me a lawyer dog 'cause this is not what's up.”
Irrelevant in this instance, if they do anything but bring you a lawyer just keep demanding a lawyer.
>I was SHOCKED when you decided to comment on the defendants POST ARREST SILENCE
>THATS BASIC LAW ITS BEEN BASIC LAW IN THIS COUNTRY FOR 50 YEARS
Damn Im a moron I meant to rely to
Only 50 years? Isn't it from 1791?
you're thinking of your mother's c**t
Common misconception. The 5th Amendment that guarantees your inalienable right to a speedy and fair trial, that your private property cannot be seized without compensation, and the right against self incrimination. What the Judge is mentioning are the Miranda Rights from the 1970s, which is why you hear cops say "You have the right to remain silent-" when arresting someone, as part of your 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Thanks PHAM about to be arrested fr fr on god.
Most of the time you won't even see the detectives. They don't arrest you, especially in cases of murder, they send SWAT, the US Marshalls, or a warrant squad to pick you up and arrest you and that is when you ask for a lawyer.
>Cinemaphile incel anon kills egirl
Imagine unironically getting this mad some e-prostitute you've never met exists. Imagine going to jail and getting raped by Black folk because of some worthless internet woman.
>Imagine unironically getting this mad some e-prostitute you've never met exists. Imagine going to jail and getting raped by Black folk because of some worthless internet woman.
She was taking huge amount of money from him because he was a simp then starting shit talking him. WTF do you think is going to happen when you fish out of the /soc/ lakes?
Imagine unironically giving ANY amount of money to a worthless e-prostitute.
You're right, though. That moron does deserve getting raped by Black folk.
He gave her validation and she fricked him a handful of times and so he thought they were in a relationship. The girl was whoring herself out and threatening to call law enforcement on dudes when she revealed she was underage and had just sent them nudes or whatever. She was an immature little shitbag of a person but she didn't deserve to die. I can easily see why he did it but after she made it clear he had no one to blame for himself for continuing to pursue her and trying to get someone who isn't interested in him focused solely on him. He took her life and will never get out and that's what's gay about the whole thing. I've seen cases where girls kill other girls, do 10 years, change their names and continue their lives. This dude gets life.
>She was an immature little shitbag of a person but she didn't deserve to die.
no she did deserve it. If she wasn't some underaged prostitute using a simp, but instead kept simps at a distance she'd be fine.
It's no different then trannies who surprise you, they rightfully end up dead
>people deserve to die because I don't like them
honestly based and redpilled
it's more then that, the girl led on her simp friend rather then never meeting him.
It's no different then getting in bed with a girl with no vagene to be found
It's an honor killing at this point
>girls shittalk pathetic loser weirdos who throw money at them from thousands of miles away for fake affection on the internet
plot twist, EVERYONE shittalks sad c**ts like you
Why tho? I'm only following my evolutionary "provider's instinct".
no you're not are you moronic
following your evolutionary providers instinct would be meeting a girl you actually live close to and can touch IRL and providing them with orgasms and a reason to stick around
becoming a ''+$5.00'' on a screen is not evolution
>and
>and
>and
You must be +18 to use this website, kiddo.
>ESL is upset at basic repitition to hammer home an extremely basic point
whats doubly sad about this is that, here on Cinemaphile, if you had watched any tv show at all ever, you will have seen an example of this syntax before
sorry that you are a permavirgin bleeding money to women who will never touch you, please dont invoke your 5th amendment when you're in the interrigation room, we all want to watch you sperg out like this at the cops
They knew each other irl moron.
how could he have killed her if they never met irl?
i've met her
he looks just like chris oneil lmao
"Chris, you see a beautiful babe who's an e-girl with luscious lips and you're a disgusting hideous bald man. Now, hypothetically..."
Looks AI generated
if I saw this image without context I would honestly assume it's a troony progress pic
friendly reminder she was 17 when she died.
looksmatched
link?
b***h got decapitated
Love a story with a happy ending.
Explore with Us is hit or miss for me. Their analysis of interrogations seems weak sometimes. Any better alternatives to JCS?
>Explore with us pointing out perpetrator's behavior
>Perpertator touches wrist
>"This is a self soothing technique"
ya it's shit exactly like that, over and over and over. eventually hard to overlook it even if the case is interesting
>This behavior could be a sign of... ANTI SOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER
>*avoids eye contact*
>"This is a sign of a COLD BLOODED KILLER"
Sex with Asuka
matt orchard, he'd honestly be better than JCS if it wasn't for his overuse of corny stock footage
He's just better, and actually commentates. Most of these other channels will just play interrogation footage for 10+ minutes straight and occasionally chime in. Basically stealing content, JCS included. Matt Orchard is far more of a documentarian. Loved his Cart Narcs video lol
Yeah Matt Orchard always seems to have something to say about the justice system in general when covering a case. He actually isn't afraid to have interesting opinions on these cases.
I was confusing Matt Orchard with that little pencil neck homosexual with the glasses who feels like he has to crack a "joke" about the events of the case as he provides a breakdown interspersed with footage of him standing in front of a green screen talking so it switches to his ugly fricking mug like every 9 seconds from the actual footage you want to see. I hate that shit.
they have pros anylize rhe footage
>"pros"
yeah nah, I remember watching some video about a murderer child who the "pros" diagnosed with early onset schizophrenia (which is exceedingly rare and schizos are rarely violent) just because she claimed she heard voices in her head and acted weird in the interrogation room.
Doesnt take a phd to know that children dont know the difference between their own internal dialoge and hearing voices and her weird behavior is just because she is a 11 year old girl, bored out of her mind being in a room for 5-6 hours, completely emotionally detached from it all because she is a psychopath with poor grasp of action and consequence.
The schiziphrenia diagnosis was obviously pushed by her defence to get some sort of psychosis insanity plea.
>he thinks 11 (ELEVEN) still isnt old enough to know what is happening
homie 12 is when you do your final exams in the first stages of schooling
you are basically as cognative as a full adult around age 5, you just havent been fed all the info yet
>""""pros""""
Body language is a pseudoscience at best, a scam at worst
It's just padded commentary to make it feel like he's adding value to the video, but most of the times the "analysis" is worthless
t. Autistic who can't read facial or body language
I have explained this quite simply before. I have played poker for a living several times in my life, mostly PLO but also NLH, and if body language experts had any basis in reality, they would all be millionaires, because all of the money made in poker is in very marginal spots, not straight flushes.
I always wondered about poker, is it the subtleties in the face?
What do poker bros look for?
just cry like a newborn and raise. george costanza taught me that
Everyone is different. But the eyes are the windows to the soul and the hands are the windows to the intent, if that makes sense. You can see people's pulse too, which can be helpful. For example, if someone goes all in in a huge pot, whether they or bluffing or have the nuts, their pulse is going to rise. The difference is, when they have the nuts, if you just wait 30-60, it tends to lower again. Whereas if they are bluffing, it stays elevated. Also, most people lean forward when they are weak and lean back when they are strong. Timing tells are a big thing too. If the final card gets dealt and it changes the nuts and the person just insta shoves all in, 9/10 its a bluff. Bet size tells can be big too. These are all very basic. Any pro doesn't do these things.
>Their analysis of interrogations seems weak sometimes
because behavioral analysis is an insanely inconsistent field full of confirmation bias and is prone to lead investigators off the trail of evidence in favor of canvasing for people who fit a behavioral profile
Dave's Lemonade is great
Ok seriously, why did he do it?
I always imagine myself as the fed and pulling out a revolver and shooting the suspect in the head. When people complain I tell them that I am the Government.
Imagine if CIA had just shot Bane in the head, everything could have been avoided
memes aside, the plane sequence is pants on head moronic, like absolutely dogshit writing
for you
All these videos are so dumb and can be beaten by remaining silent and demanding your lawyer. There is no way on planet earth to talk your way out of trouble when they’ve brought you in for questioning
True but if it's something they question about that happened like months or years prior just be like I dunno I don't recall. Just say this over and over and no need for a lawyer.
what vid is this?
ty
Now I remember why I never saved it, the only full version available is this narrated shit. The only unnarrated version is just his confession
Imagine the sociopaths and psycopaths watching this. It's literally going to school for them and learning what not to do. I don't see why this should be released in public. But it makes for addictive television.
Criminals literally have brain damage and may literally lack the prefrontal cortex necessary to stop from talking about it
evil doesn't exist, only brain abnormalities
Yes literally true. You could screen these at the genetic level. The majority of people are not criminals.
>Evil doesn't exist, only evil
???
Link to this vid? I never saved it
>he watches his interrogation videos with moronic narrators speaking over them
This interrogation contains the greatest dramatic pause ever recorded on camera
>no timestamp for a 2 hour video
>he doesn't watch interrogation videos like they're feature films
pathetic.
>hey guys check out this moment of silence in this 2 hour video
?
>
a shame because its a great case and you've just turned 90% of the people who scrolled past off of it
nice autism
I'm listening to this in the background and I can't really figure out what she did.
Killed a child
i can fix her
If he watched a JCS video he could’ve got out scott free
>be lawgay who actually does well at uni
>talk to police acting like a tard instead of remaining silent
I still dont get it
It would've worked if they didn't have the evidence.
Stayven did remain silent thoughalbeit
Stayvun knew there was still physical evidence in his apartment that would be enough to convict him. I wonder whether he did the interrogstion just for kicks to see if he could trip up the detectives. Either way, nothing he said in his interview had much bearing on the case, so it is something of a win that he talked to the cops for hours and they got nothing out of him.
Stayvun posted here, he was making kino for us all to enjoy.
where is his lawyer?
This is the single best thing you can say if you are in an interrogation like this:
>look, I did not do anything, I'm innocent. But I've heard plenty stories of innocent people being pushed to false confessions during interrogations like these. And wrongfully convicted for a crime they did not commit. So for that reason, I will say nothing more but this: "I want a lawyer".
Boom. Checkmate.
You don't have to write some fricking script for yourself you fricking autist just remember to be respectful and say "I plea the 5th" when they ask questions
>I'm innocent
Wrong move. Stay silent request lawyer. ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU
The only other thing you should ask is if you are being detained or if you are free to go. If the latter is the case gtfo and call your lawyer
>am I being detained?
>>no
>am I free to go?
>>no
>am I under arrest?
>>no
>am I free to go?
>>no
>I want my lawyer
>>yes
>I have the right to remain silent
>>...
>have you called a lawyer?
>>no
>am I free to go?
>>no
wdyd?
Nope
>Am I being detained?
>No
>Am I free to go?
>No
Repeat until he says yes to one.
If he says yes to detaining you:
>I will not answer any questions until my lawyer is present
Then remain silent
If you are free to go then ask to be escorted from the building. If they refuse to escort you're going to have to roll the dice on getting up and walking out.
Also if you are being detained.
>On what suspicion am I being detained?
This is the information you can give to your lawyer.
Then promptly shut the frick up.
>Repeat until he says yes to one.
It takes less energy to say no than it does to ask those questions and cops can swap out if they get tired. Why would he ever say yes?
Then it's only helping you when you go to trial.
>Your honor we have an 8 hour tape of my client asking if he was being detained or free to go and the investigating officers refused to give him an answer.
In this hypothetical, you'll never go to trial because the cops will never get you a lawyer. In fact you'll never leave the interrogation room.
We both know that’s not true. They literally cannot keep you in perpetuity, they never have, and they never will. They may make you wait several hours, maybe even a day or more, but they’re going to give up and you’re gonna walk out eventually
I think he was making a joke. Also in turd world countries they can.
If you make it to the interrogation room in a 3rd world nation safe to assume you’re going to prison/labor camp regardless.
I've seen this clip and it didn't help. Him and his biker crew still got sentenced for murder.
There's a news story every week now of some new difficult-to-handle mentally ill degenerate or hobo writhing in their own shit in a county jail cell until they die of thirst or sepsis or ass sore infection because nobody there wants to deal with them. I can definitely believe a couple of meathead officer maggot types would lock somebody's ass in a cell for a couple of extra days to see if they start talking, law be damned. When the frick did the law ever stop a cop from doing something he wanted to and lying about it?
The law says you can detain anybody who is mentally ill because they could be considered a threat to himself and the public. So in any event any cop can detain anybody on a whim because any kind of aversion to authority can be interpreted as a dangerous mental illness.
That’s cause they don’t follow protocol. Almost no one does; people really think they can talk their way out of it, but it never works, and you will always say something to incriminate yourself. That’s all they need, if they’re in a cell then they’re being held on suspicion of the crime or another one.
You can't be held for questioning for longer than 48 hours or some number like that.
>has it been 48 hours?
>>no
>what about now?
>>no
>what about now?
>>I don't know
>can you go find out?
>>yes
>please go find out if it has been 48 hours
>>no
Then simply eat the pig.
>can I eat you?
>>yes
>lie down on the table so I can eat you
>>no
>how can I eat you if you won't lie down on the table?
>>I don't know
Besides being corny or looking weak if it later turns out you were indeed up to some sketchy shit and the prosecution can be like
>and he says he was Innocent? This was only hours after he defecated through a sunroof!
It's not much to work with, and it can play well to a jury, who despite being told
>don't be biased by you pleading the fifth
will still have it on their mind
Yeah as boring as it is. Just say you want a lawyer and don't ask answer any of their questions. You don't need to come up with a reason why. You're not the first person to plead the fifth.
yeah but just leave out all the gay shit and say lawyer as soon as the cop walks in. Don't tell him your name, birthday, shoe size nothing. The only thing coming out of your mouth should be lawyer and refuse to answer any question. You might think something innocent like "were you home jacking off at 5 pm yesterday?" is fine to answer but that might be the final nail in your coffin so stfu
>anime main character syndrome
oh yeah you're getting convicted, i know for a fact you wouldnt be able to help yourself and spill the whole fricking case wide open
>>look, I did not do anything, I'm innocent. But I've heard plenty stories of innocent people being pushed to false confessions during interrogations like these. And wrongfully convicted for a crime they did not commit. So for that reason, I will say nothing more but this: "I want a lawyer".
>Your honor, please view this interrogation footage of the defendant saying "Boom. Checkmate."
>we the jury find the defendant guilty of being a massive homosexual
Watch interrogation video of guy who was proved guilty:
>"The suspect pauses before answering, this demonstrates their guilt as they are hesitating because they lied.
Watch video of guy proven innocent:
>The suspect pauses before answering, this demonstrates their innocence as they are taking time to remember the real events.
These videos are 99% bollocks made up by the narrator who already knows the outcome of the case and just lists every action as suspicious if they're guilty, or genuine if they are innocent.
Hey there Anon, take a seat for me there would you bud? Now before we get into all this, could I get you anything? Coffee, bottle of water? Alright then.
Let me just come right out and ask: why did you pirate all those films? Were you forced into it somehow, did you not have a choice? Was purchased content just too vanilla for your taste? Help us to understand how you're not a monster, because the jury and prosecution and everybody you know is going to think you're an evil, cold-blooded bastard. I'm sorry, I've been doing this for a long time and I know how it goes.
We've got all the evidence we need, frankly, but could you just tell us what happened so we can understand your side of it? Show us you're not that evil piece of shit, show us it was a mistake that got out of hand and turn this ship around. Let's start by telling us who referred you to the private tracker. Help us help you out of this.
>take a seat for me there would you bud?
I am invoking my fifth amendment right to silence.
>Were you forced into it somehow, did you not have a choice?
I am invoking my fifth amendment right to silence.
>Was purchased content just too vanilla for your taste?
I am invoking my fifth amendment right to silence.
>could you just tell us what happened so we can understand your side of it?
I am invoking my fifth amendment right to silence.
Looks like another undiagnosed mentally ill schizophrenic fell through the cracks of society and killed himself by slamming his head against the concrete floor of his cell. Tragic for all involved
Hey criminal scum, remember how you're not supposed to say anything to the cops? Well, remember that the opposite principal applies to your lawyer. Tell them all about your crimes so they can advise you effectively.
Protip: your lawyer can help you out with any past crime, but future crimes are a big no-no with them.
Do you reckon Casey Anthony for once in her fricking life actually told her lawyer the truth about what she did and that's why he was able to bamboozle the jury into letting her go?
Yes. The truth is she got high, the kid fell in the pool, and they covered it up by obfuscating.
Yeah she fell in the pool and drowned with duct tape over her mouth.
>Tell them all about your crimes so they can advise you effectively.
I've always wondered about this. If you were on trial for murder would you ACTUALLY tell your lawyer you did it ahead of time?
Surely there's something in place that they have to come clean?
>Surely there's something in place that they have to come clean?
You know there's a reason people joke that lawyers never get to heaven, right?
It’s illegal under any circumstance, but probably the biggest reason that your lawyer would never rat on you is because they’d be destroying their entire career to do it. In some of the most extreme “this guy 100% for sure murdered 10 children” type cases the state assigned lawyer will pretty much just say that they’re going to try to present all the facts of the case so that the jury can make the best decision, but even then they couldn’t use anything said between the lawyer and client as evidence.
how do you explain the government being able to bypass attorney-client privilege to get access to the recorded convos with Trump and his lawyers?
EVERYONE deserves a fair trial. that is the basis of a fair system. if the prosecution cannot get the jury to convict the defendant that is their failure to present the facts and plead their case. defense attorneys are not responsible for guilty men walking free, the incompetence of the prosecutor is.
that being said, lawyers are not allowed to lie so telling your lawyer you did the crime limits their options in terms of what they're allowed to tell the court. you should answer their questions and tell them anything you think they should know (truthfully of course) but never outright confess to the crime.
Grant theft Amato
So you never go to jail so you win
that's a pretty shitty win living out the rest of your life inside an interrogation room
Yeah it's shitty but what are you gonna do?
The only way to deal with interrogation
im glad this has an entire review of Bad Santa in it
This is the single best thing you can say if you are in an interrogation like this:
>The charges, officer?
>Ok Mike what I’m gonna do now is start talking and I’m not gonna stop I’m gonna keep saying words and sentences and I’m not gonna take a breath or rather I will be taking breaths but only very quickly and in between words because as I said I’m going to be talking nonstop and that’s what I’m here to do now you are sitting there and I’m gonna go ahead and just keep talking without stopping now there might be times when it seems like I’m gonna stop but like I said that’s not what I’m here to do I’m here to talk in a monotone voice and I’m not gonna stop alright? Now I see that you’re wearing blue and I’m willing to bet that you wish you wore red but it’s not that simple now listen to my creaky chair and I’m gonna keep talking I’m not gonna stop and I can hear the crinkle of that blanket and I’m gonna have to tell you that’s actually a large piece of paper but we call it a blanket we don’t get real blankets because it’s not really worth it in the budget and I’m just gonna keep saying stuff and you might think I’m gonna stop but actually I’m gonna go ahead and just keep talking and keep talking is what I’m about now you you’re not a bad guy I can see that and I don’t think you’re some kind of monster. There’s no doot in my mind that you did it, ok? No doot in my mind at all. Are you some kind of monster? This was a mistake right Mike? This was a mistake right? Mike. Right? You’d take this back right? Mike? Mike? I know you’re not a monster, are you a monster? You haven’t touched your doughnut.
why did that guy do it he looked like a chad
I wouldn't say anything. I would just listen. And that's what nobody did.
>I’m not answering any of your questions, pig. I want to talk to a lawyer.
The truth is that if you don't trust the police, your society is beyond redemption anyway and all law and morality is off the table.
If youre being interrogated youre already fricked. Moral of the story is dont murder people.
>the cops have never interrogated an innocent
The moral of the story is never ever ever interact with anybody.
I'm from Maine and I literally know a guy who knows a guy who knew this guy
Statistically I know a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows where you live.
>Watching EWU
>Avoiding eye contact is a sure sign of guilt
>Making just a little too MUCH eye contact however, can make you seen equally guilty
Holy shit dude
Everyone is always guilty, cops just need to figure out what you're guilty of.
It's always retroactive analysis. They know the guy is guilty so they overthink any of his behaviours and make it out that it's a clear indicator of guilt.
Those channels are all so fricking stupid.
>Play entire interrogation footage
>Make some powerpoint slides stating basic pop psychology
>Pay someone else to talk over them
>Rake in tens of thousands of dolllars from patreon
At least that balding Irish basedboy puts actual effort in his videos and narrates them himself.
Does this work in real countries?
It's supposed to, but I have seen many body cam videos of cops violating people's civil rights.
You only have to let them into your house if they have a warrant, or reasonable suspicion (which is legally more strictly defined then you would initially suspect). They can't just bs some suspicion most of the time.
I enjoy watching body cams and audits more than these moron criminals incriminating themselves in interrogation rooms.
If you’re seriously some murderer or serial killer or whatever. Why wouldn’t you just try to run or attack or kill the person who tries to arrest you, then try to escape?
Literally more chance of freedom that way if they seriously have you fricked right?
what is the point of polygraphs when they can be faked so easily? is it just some kind of fake out pressure technique?
yes
It’s more than that, in the US in some states it’s fricking admissible in court. It’s really easy to trip people up on it and make it look as if you “failed” a question. It’s basically a build your own evidence toolkit
Maybe I’m just a good goy whitey but every interaction I’ve had with police was positive
>pulled over a few times while driving in 1-3 am
>they ask if I’ve been drinking
>say no
>they just say ok, thanks. Then let me go (assume they didn’t smell booze or weed so didn’t bother breathelizer or further checks)
>drunk/high guy started following me after he got kicked out of a night club, was worried he was gonna mug me or something
>saw cops on corner, told them. They told me to keep walking and they’d detain him for a talk for a few minutes to see what’s up. He immediately started trying to attack them and they restrained him. Turned out he was mentally ill, drug addicted, was definitely gonna mug me
>uncle killed himself and I found him
>went into shock because I found him
>called the police, an unnecessary ambulance and everything
>cops insisted on staying with me until other family could come from states away, so literally 10+ hours because they didn’t want me to be alone
only had one bad interaction with police, but being polite about it made them leave me alone
>having party
>drunk, high, and tripping on acid
>cops come for noise complaint
>step outside and close door behind me
>they ask if there are drugs or anyone is in immediate danger
>say "nothing illegal officers. didn't realize it was so loud in here, it'll be quiet the rest of the night"
>they ask me more questions
>say "i'm not comfortable answering more questions, can I go back inside?"
>they see they aren't getting anything and leave, no noise violation ticket or anything
my neighbors who called the cops on us got busted for selling drugs the next week lol
You're probably a sex haver and don't even fricking belong here. Either that or you pass for a girl.
yeah it's cos you're white
Right it's that, and surely isn't because he's not some aggressive violent minority getting himself in violent altercations with the police for no reason
>witness a guy get beat and mugged for his shoes by a violent mob
>call cops
>try to tell cops what happened
>it's on video
>they refuse to take a statement from anyone
>refuse to watch the footage
>guy is begging for permission to call someone
>take the guy away from the paramedics and manhandle him into the back of their cruiser
>leave
The last story is rough. I'm sorry about your uncle, anon.
My drunk dad threw a tv at me once, and when the cop showed up he told me it was "his house, his tv, you should have gotten out of the way" and then arrested me under beyond parental control
I've only had positive interactions with the cops as well I'm black btw
>leaving after work event
>happened to be wearing a suit (this is probably what saved me)
>piss drunk
>driving home
>make a u-turn at a stoplight to get some wendys
>sirens
>apparently that was a no u-turn intersection
>panic attack
>pull over
>white officer gets out
>put on my best customer service voice
>he asks if I know why he stopped me
>nope
>tells me about the uturn
>"Where are you headed at this hour?"
>tell him I wanted some nuggies before going home
>smell the alcohol coming from my breath, so keep explanation short
>stares at me for a few seconds
>looks me up and down
>"I'm gonna let you off with a warning, have a good night"
>walks away
>leaves
good to know that being respectful and cordial still works. Never ate better fast food in my life
>called the police, an unnecessary ambulance and everything
did you get a bill for the ambulance?
>interrogator uses the “cookie jar” analogy
and?
There's been multiple interrogation of Cinemaphile suspects and as usual they have a 50iq otherwise they wouldn't be in that situation
I always wondered what it'd be like to commit a murder and try to outwit the police
Not that i'd ever do anything illegal or something
It would be insanely easy to get away with a murder where you gain nothing and have no connection to the person. Leave your phone at home, drive a few hours in a random direction, find an isolated person going for a walk in a rural area, shoot them and take the shell with you. No motive, no evidence, no connection. Only way you’re getting caught is 1 in a million chance they track you by your car but even that could be eliminated with proper planning. Not really any benefit to doing this kind of thing though which is why almost all murders are done for personal or financial reasons.
I was about to post this exact same thing, a normal person committing a random murder with a tiny bit of planning is essentially impossible to solve. Of course, normal people don't murder other people or commit crimes in general, so if you did do this you'd likely be inclined to continue killing and eventually be caught.
Interesting
You are just parroting that Carlin bit where he explain how can you kill the biggest amount of people without getting caught.
Isn't it something like 40% of murders have never been solved?
You'd have to assume that a large portion of those are murders where there was some motive or connection that was just never found.
So yeah...
what is the rate in real countries/states though, 40% is probably inflated by random nignogs fighting over corners and refusing to help police
murder is bad btw
Depends on who you kill.
Most of these people are psychotic cowards who kill the easiest targets they have: their family.
It's rare to find one that targets someone in a justice killing.
The cases on YT is basically "I did it cause I could"
Best advice I've heard is the less you touch the body the better.
Don't kill a guy, and then drag them into your house, leaves a trail and your fingerprints would cover the entire crime scene.
Best is to break in, shoot the guy, and then leave. Don't touch anything, don't steal anything, a quick job that leaves as little evidence as possible. Drive bys are pretty effective but this requires to have a driver, which is dangerous. Do it alone. Don't have any loose ends.
All in minecraft of course
I get scared thinking that despite me trying to invoke my 5th or demanding a lawyer they'd still somehow get me to talk and incriminate myself
>Murder is bad btw
>You're not under arrest. You're free to leave if you want.
>Nobody ever leaves
STEEEEEEEEEYVUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN
Cops do not care about why you did something. They only care about if.
You will not outsmart a trained investigator.
You have a right to remain silent.
Cops have a legal right to lie to you.
There are tons of innocent men and women in prison because they talked too much. There are tons of guilty men and women in public because they didn't.
tbh I wouldn't want to outsmart or outfight an investigator, I want to have Woland or Sutter Cane powers so any time they use logic or evidence I just warp reality until the investigator goes insane
Matt Orchard is good but what the frick is his accent?
kiwi
That would explain why I thought he sounded like an Aussie trying to do posh British
I couldn't deal with it either. he shoulda got someone to voice his videos
Bosmer
Any cases where the suspect manages to actually convert the investigator to her side and they run away together but then she betrays him and shoots him in the head then she gets away with it?
No amount of prep in the world is gonna help you when the cop "discovers" a usb full of kiddy porn on your person.
Who the hell keeps anything that can be considered cp on their person?
well technically thats when you better prep your anus
>Being so terrified of answering a couple of yes/no questions that you'd rather pay your lawyer $850 an hour to do it instead
Do Americans really?
Court appointed lawyers are free
>trusting the cops
Enjoy getting raped in jail!
Weak bait, officer
Am I autistic if my favorite part of true crime is learning about the forensic shit?
I watched the entirety of the grant amato trial and my favorite part was when they had the fed who analyzed his phone, I learned a lot about the internal mechanics of iPhones from that, and I can't think of many other places where that's available
Autism appreciates autism.
For me it's the thrill of the hunt and the lengths they go to hide.
The shame is these sickos murder soft targets like trusted people's rather then political or some butthole who wronged them.
They're evil rather than a noble
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO WHY AREN'T REAL SERIAL KILLERS LIKE THE TRAGIC VILLAINS FROM MY MANGAS!!!!!
They'd be heroes rather than villains.
Imagine a high IQ criminal who can hurt a lot of people and gets high status with a good life. Wait a minute, that's Walstreet.
Not against the few who hurt everyone.
I'm not some homosexual who wants to hurt those who hurt the heckin puppers.
At the peasant level, the Chads who ruin women and Simps who enable them deserve to be lynched.
The Stacy's who can't stop bawdting it up with strangers need to go too
>Not if I tell myself it isn't
It is. Killing is evil.
David killed Goliath so obviously this isn't true.
Killing is evil.
Says who? You? Pfft.
I think I'm going to believe the Bible over some Cinemaphile dweeb.
they're called the ten commandments not the ten suggestions
God permits killing numerous times in the bible. Nice try.
You have a mental disorder.
killing is evil
>watch interrogation videos
>pretend im the detective
>take my delusion a step further and comment on my own investigations on a podcast that doesnt exist
Basado
yep. I just want to feel important and smart
And here we see the defendant clam up and ask for his constitutionally guaranteed right to a lawyer, a sure sign that he is guilty.
What is OP from? I can't find it.
If you're ever in an interrogation and they get you a drink, make sure to stuff the cup/can in your pocket and rinse it before throwing it out. Cops are notorious for stealing DNA samples from cups and cans used by detainees and trying to match them with the database to see if they pin crimes on them.
Fortunately, you don't have to worry about this anymore! If anybody in your entire extended family pays money to give a company their DNA rights and tell them they're 8% Irish, you will be found automatically from their presence in law enforcement databases. Drink up bros
This. It boggles my mind people come on /misc/ and post their 23+me results. How moronic can you be?
>drive through an area where a shooting had just taken place
>police ask to search my car
>decline
>go home
>they arrest me because a car matching mine was seen minutes before the shooting
>questioned
>"I don't want to say anything until I can speak to a lawyer"
>police try to get me talking about inconsequential things
>just give non-verbal responses
>by the time my gf arranges for a lawyer, police come back
>cameras caught a car of a different colour with different plates
>apologise and let me go
>gives me a pretty nice sandwich and cold lemonade to eat while I wait to be picked up
It was much easier to just shut up and wait once I was actually being held. During the arrest my natural instinct was to try to over-explain and avoid being taken, but after babbling for a few minutes I got my shit together and stopped speaking.
It's always funny seeing homosexuals on Cinemaphile acting hard, saying "FRICK PIGS" and all that. Like any of you have ever spent more than a couple minutes around one. Ooh, you torrent shitty movies and watch JCS videos. Real badass.
>and imagine you're the one getting interviewd by the police
do you homosexuals really
Huh
Imagining you're the one being interrogated is ez mode.
>no clue
>no comment
>who?
If you really need to engage your neurons try imagining how you'd get a confession out of this one instead.
You can plan all you want but once you're in that seat your adrenaline will be pumping, you'll be scared and thinking of what they know. This is ehy its a really bad idea to try to talk yourself out of it. Just say you want a lawyer and plead the 5th. Let them prove everything and dont fall for the "we already know and can prove what you did just admit it" shit
What now chuds?
Kaio-Ken x3 oughta be enough
I can't fricking handle this guy.
I want to watch it but holy shit shit man.
>I've never seen such efficient precision knifemanship
he must have been internally busting a nut hearing all that
Yes, just don't say anything.
>the guy that killed his parents and tried to disappear them by literally boiling them away on the kitchen stove
I know that Guy Jr did boil his mothers head and planned on throwing both of his parents bodies in acid but who are you talking about?
Link?
zelda
give me 1 reason why I should talk to cops without a lawyer
>Cop offers me his daughters hand in marriage if I agree to be the fall guy for a drug operation so he can get a promotion
Okay but what do I do in this situation?
i bet i could ace a 10 hour long investigation by responding to all accusations with anger while claiming the investigator has homosexual feelings for me.
alright cliff