what does Cinemaphile think the plot would be this time
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Now that the Top Gun 3 has been confirmed
what does Cinemaphile think the plot would be this time
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Crossover with Men In Black
I would unironically watch that but i really doubt Will Smith would play nice with Tom Cruise.
Unless we are talking about the lesser men in black and have that Thor guy and that black b***h.
>the black/latina/ethnically diverse chick will become the main character
9/11 or the red baron
I WANNA SEE HANGMAN BTFO THE GHOST OF KIEV MID AIR
it will remake the empire strikes back plot, just like the first film was a remake of a new hope
homie what the frick are you talking about
>homie what the frick are you talking about
watch a new hope then watch maverick and you'll see they copied it, especially the death star run
I think he's implying Maverick was just The Force Awakens. Personally, I'd argue in the realm of soft reboots, it was actually worse.
Well, considering Maverick was the exact same story as Top Gun, I'm willing to bet Goose's brother, played by Ryan Gosling, is going to die, and Top Gun will be traumatized by it. He'll visit Iceman's grave who visits him as a robot force ghost and tells him to stop being a pussy. Ebin action sequence with worse flight choreography than a random session of Ace Combat ensues. Gay hugs. Roll credits to 80s action music. Presumed "In Memoriam" section dedicated to Val Kilmer, which may or may not hilariously include a picture of Goose.
All you can hope for is that the sound design/mixing is great, because those are the only people who were actually trying during Maverick's production.
>Sound design on Maverick was trying
They did alright for the most part but the aircraft gun sounds were fricking dogshit.
They had to use m2 browning sounds for the cannons because actual minigun sounds are like jump scares. It's just a sudden BRRRRRRRRRRR at 200dB.
Hollywood just realized that for once they didn't ruin a movie's legacy with a shitty revival so now they announced another sequel to correct that mistake.
I think Cruise has the star power to stop that.
My concern is that may soon lessen because Dead Reckoning under preformed.
>I think Cruise has the star power to stop that.
he is very close to hitting the wall and turning into a middle aged lesbian, and once that happens ITS OVER
Never. He already hit the wall...but he is getting the Indiana Jones stay young CGI. Tom will never die.
>they didn't ruin a movie's legacy with a shitty revival
I still don't get how anybody has this opinion when the movie killed Iceman for no reason and retconned the entire second half of the original film just to recycle the same exact character arc. I mean for me? It only made me like Top Gun more, and I wasn't even that huge of a fan of it to begin with. Maverick is unoriginal, inexcusable dogshit.
Want to use the same story and imagery beat for beat? Whatever. But for frick's sake let the new generation you hired to recreate those scenes actually tell the story, rather than just being weird cutaway filler sequences.
Tom Cruise ruined the movie just by being in it for anything more than a cameo. I feel for Miles Teller and whatever the dude with the twelve foot jawline's name is. They got paid, but they had nothing to do.
>I still don't get how anybody has this opinion when the movie killed Iceman for no reason
It was done extremely respectfully and incorporated his real life cancer struggles well.
>and retconned the entire second half of the original film
The frick are you talking about?
Respectfully? He just dies and it has no reason to be in the movie. There's the little funeral segment and it's just ten minutes that contribute nothing to the movie. That's the opposite of respect, both to the character and actor. Least they could've done is written him into a better screenplay.
Also in case you forgot, the entire second half of Top Gun is Maverick moving on from Goose's death. That's the point of the famous dogtags being thrown overboard scene and the film ending on an emotional high note. In "Maverick" we now get to see the titular character, thirty years later, struggling against... not being able to move on from Goose's death, again. Oh... well I haven't seen that before, huh? Oh great, a climactic action sequence featuring a bunch of non-characters with them bombing literal Star Wars Death Troopers. Wow. I'm really feelin' it, Mr Krabs.
I want to see an official Top Gun 3 that is completely Indian produced and has no continuity to the previous films, just a soulless reboot of the first film written by somebody who watched it once and barely understood what was going on. The CGI effects will be Who Killed Captain Alex-tier.
The guy who played Rooster said last year that a Top Gun 3 would be about him and Hangman doing buddy cop stuff while Tom Cruise plays the grumpy police chief that has to tard rangle them.
>The guy who played Rooster said last year that a Top Gun 3 would be about him and Hangman doing buddy cop stuff while Tom Cruise plays the grumpy police chief that has to tard rangle them.
Source?
That would honestly be ideal.
Let Mav stay happy & retired banging JenCon and let the well done non woke legacy cast continue forward.
I read it in the Maverick wikipedia article. I don't know if it's still there, but it did have a source.
Do you think there will actually be real jets on screen this time?
AI planes bad
does the u.s. navy have many fighter pilots approaching their mid 60's?
Yeah. They test fly planes and fill instructor roles.
Bump
Defending Japan from North Korea?
bad guys will be more china-coded this time
Maybe. On the one hand, Russia is so much easier villanise because they already are mask-off in that department. On the other hand, we've already beaten Russia's 5th gen, so using the Chinese 5th gen would be fresh.
Tom Cruise gets a wise-crackin' ultra-intelligent fighter jet, voiced by Eddie Deezen, and has to save his black (not gay) male partner from a group of stripping taliban feminists
>Tom Cruise gets a wise-crackin' ultra-intelligent fighter jet, voiced by Eddie Deezen, and has to save his black (not gay) male partner from a group of stripping taliban feminists
kek id watch this.
>There's a mission that needs doing
>Let's waste most of the run time on the training
>Completes mission, maybe with complications
>Lands back on carrier, everyone cheers, roll credits
Seriously fricks sake I don't want to see just one op, and I don't want it to be against some nameless, faceless enemy. Make up a country and make them a viable opponent.