Mo apparently she's gonna be in Sevret Wars. That's where her Spider-Woman is ffrom. Secret Wars. I mean she doesn't have to be but otherwise that's quite a coincidence of timing.
>Disney
You mean Sony? Thats what this movie is all about. That's what it means and what it's purpose is. Sony is selling. At least temporary limited rights. That's just part of what Secret Wars is gonna be about. Disney can do it without them but again this is quite a coincidence of timing otherwise.
I knew when this whole trying to make Spidermans rogues a universe thing was announced it was a bad fricking idea. Morbius is just a vampire movie. Theres a million of them. Who gives a shit? Kraven is just a generic action film/hunting movie.
Its also baffling as frick to not have Spiderman in any of these films, not even as a cameo.
Yeah, it doesn't make any sense without Spider-man.
Say they even get this 'Universe' off the ground, and each of these individual movies does well and introduces a character audiences want more of. Aren't they still villains? What's their 'Avengers' movie going be? Is Kraven going to be a hero that saves the day? Will it be a mishmash with the Sinister Six fighting Madam Web? Or is it just going to be a Suicide Squad knock off?
So many questions, all leading to failure. This roadmap for Sony makes no sense and is leading nowhere fast.
You could make an interesting Kraven solo film, if they were willing to tap into the storytelling of him rejecting modern sensibilities regarding morality and with him it's all about "honor". But they won't do that. Instead, they'll contrive him to be the good guy with modern day morality sensibilities.
Imagine a villains perspective kino where the bad guy is sick of living in poverty and resorts to knocking over banks or whatnot and here comes Spiderman there to knock him back down again just when hes close to reaching his goal. Could be played straight, would probably work best played for laughs but you could do something genuinely interesting. Instead all we get is SpiderMan rogue turns anti-hero movie #398.
The problem is that modern day media demands them to be seen as the good guys instead of the outright villains. I'd love a superhero version of "Snatch" where you know these people are underhanded, but don't care because of how interesting they are.
That wouldn't be bad casting. The problem is that modern studios based on western IPs would never do it. Black Cat is an overtly seductive character, and having women lean into their sexuality is "problematic" these days....if it's a heterosexual context.
The other problem is that a lot of Black Cat's story in the comics (before the modern dark times) is that she genuinely loves Peter, but she lost that chance to be with him and is pining in suffering. A woman being defined by her love of a man is a cardinal sin in today's society.
>that dog face
wall soon sweeneyweenies
id like to put dat dawg in her too
Mo apparently she's gonna be in Sevret Wars. That's where her Spider-Woman is ffrom. Secret Wars. I mean she doesn't have to be but otherwise that's quite a coincidence of timing.
We are never seeing these characters again anon. Disney will never bring these versions into the MCU.
>Disney
You mean Sony? Thats what this movie is all about. That's what it means and what it's purpose is. Sony is selling. At least temporary limited rights. That's just part of what Secret Wars is gonna be about. Disney can do it without them but again this is quite a coincidence of timing otherwise.
id settle for any proper topless scene. her last few side boob scenes really sucked. would suck if she just starts doing quick daddadiro scenes
Sweenis will be fine.
She's diversified her boobfolio to include Ford and other product placements with sponsors.
Again, you mental fricks gotta remember her Roger Corman era begins soon with Boobarella and Zardoz 2: Electric Boobaloo.
*meaning Disney can make Secret Wars without any of Sony's characters
hard to believe those are 100% real
Why does she wear the mask?
She's a big (titted) guy
if i eat her out will she cum?
4U
She is imo the perfect example of a butterface. An extremely mid looking woman with great breasts.
What is she hiding with that Spider Emoji over her hand? Probably a vape, right? Why hide it.
>What is she hiding with that Spider Emoji over her hand?
Good question
handgays ruining it for everyone once again
looks like she's holding her phone. Probably blocked it out so people couldn't see what was on the screen.
Propably iPhone and shes shilling Samsung
I imagine what was in her hand was a hitachi up her cooter and I got so hard I had to go to the bathroom and readjust but luckily I am at home today.
>Now thats Madame Web flopped
I mean yes it probably will flop but it's still early in the day of its release. Its fate is yet to be decided
That was a real suit and not ShitGI?
Yes, they actually convinced Sydney to wear clothes. Quite an accomplishment, really.
Sony's probably shitting bricks over Kraven.
I knew when this whole trying to make Spidermans rogues a universe thing was announced it was a bad fricking idea. Morbius is just a vampire movie. Theres a million of them. Who gives a shit? Kraven is just a generic action film/hunting movie.
Its also baffling as frick to not have Spiderman in any of these films, not even as a cameo.
They've been trying for so long to make a Sinister Six movie that is sad at this point
Yeah, it doesn't make any sense without Spider-man.
Say they even get this 'Universe' off the ground, and each of these individual movies does well and introduces a character audiences want more of. Aren't they still villains? What's their 'Avengers' movie going be? Is Kraven going to be a hero that saves the day? Will it be a mishmash with the Sinister Six fighting Madam Web? Or is it just going to be a Suicide Squad knock off?
So many questions, all leading to failure. This roadmap for Sony makes no sense and is leading nowhere fast.
You could make an interesting Kraven solo film, if they were willing to tap into the storytelling of him rejecting modern sensibilities regarding morality and with him it's all about "honor". But they won't do that. Instead, they'll contrive him to be the good guy with modern day morality sensibilities.
Imagine a villains perspective kino where the bad guy is sick of living in poverty and resorts to knocking over banks or whatnot and here comes Spiderman there to knock him back down again just when hes close to reaching his goal. Could be played straight, would probably work best played for laughs but you could do something genuinely interesting. Instead all we get is SpiderMan rogue turns anti-hero movie #398.
>Imagine a villains perspective kino where the bad guy is sick of living in poverty
Pearl (2022).
Is it kino? Might check it out if so.
The problem is that modern day media demands them to be seen as the good guys instead of the outright villains. I'd love a superhero version of "Snatch" where you know these people are underhanded, but don't care because of how interesting they are.
I'd love to smell her feet after a day of filming on set with those shoes.
i need an action figure of her!!! Hasbro, mafex, shf do it
It would be kino casting.
That wouldn't be bad casting. The problem is that modern studios based on western IPs would never do it. Black Cat is an overtly seductive character, and having women lean into their sexuality is "problematic" these days....if it's a heterosexual context.
The other problem is that a lot of Black Cat's story in the comics (before the modern dark times) is that she genuinely loves Peter, but she lost that chance to be with him and is pining in suffering. A woman being defined by her love of a man is a cardinal sin in today's society.
nice, which episode?