Screenwriter Stuart Beattie was "devastated" the trilogy got the ax as Lucasfilm pivoted to Disney+ shows.
“I wrote the film that they based the show on,” Beattie said. “I spent like a year, year-and-a-half working on it. And then, when the decision was made not to make any more spinoff films after ‘Solo’ came out, I left the project and went on to other things. Joby [Harold] came on and took my scripts and turned it from two hours into six. So, I did not work with them at all, I just got credit for the episodes because it was all my stuff.”
https://www.indiewire.com/2022/06/obi-wan-kenobi-star-wars-film-trilogy-solo-bomb-1234737641/
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
>turned it from two hours into six
no wonder most of it was shit
It was meant to be a trilogy. That math checks out.
Why the hell would amovie made many years ago affect a TV series, which is only related by franchise?
And Solo flopped because it was bad & lore breaking. So they should have made Kenobi a good series that made sense in the Star Wars universe.
solo didnt break any lore
It may part of it really stupid. Thankfully it's Star Wars. You have to forget about any kind of canon integrity if you want to enjoy it.
having an explanation for his name was dumb as all frick
>Everything Han talked about in the OT happened in 1 week of his life
>solo didnt break any lore
>spaceships using fuel, something that only appeared in TLJ
>The fricking Millennium Falcon is a sentient being
Which part of the original three movies does that contradict?
>Which part of the original three movies does that contradict?
The part where the Millennium Falcon was cool and not a gay anime ship.
hey anime ships are cool. Everyone loves the Bebop and the Outlaw Star.
If I want a gay anime ship I'll watch gay anime, not Star Wars.
the part where they aren't shit.
>And Solo flopped because it was bad & lore breaking.
It partly flopped because the first movie of the new trilogy completely tore the Han Solo character to shreds, undid the character development from the first trilogy and made him into a useless washed up loser piece of shit. Why would people want to see the useless, old, washed up, loser piece of shit's backstory? The pathological need of the writers to tear down the masculine hero keeps sabotaging the franchise.
>lore breaking
Please have a nice day
>reddit spacing
Go back
He just fricking explained it. Why are you asking a stupid rhetorical question predicated on you "knowing better" when you were just told what transpired
Why are you in a Star Wars thread? You know only morons watch the show and only mega morons talk about it online.
Why are you here hanging out with self professed morons? Maybe I like star wars, that has nothing to do with you asking moronic rhetoricals then acting smug.
Leave the thread, dummy. Just close the tab and open up Skyrim. Pretend Star Wars doesn't exist for a while. It'll do wonders for your health. Unless you have it turned on legendary difficulty and survival mode and the first dragon locks you into a killcam and chomps you if you get anywhere near it
lol I will go play video games hahaha fair idea
>n-n-no, I'm not mad. you're mad!
I'm mad because whatever role you set out for your character you have to also be a whiz with a bow and arrow
Fair point. I don't treat Skyrim as anything other than a depression-time-waster.
It's not as fun as the other Elder Scrolls, it doesn't make sense, the quests are linear, the gameplay is casual and watered down...but it's the perfect thing to spend time with for 2-3 hours when I'm too depressed to do anything else.
It’s marketing. Disney bases their decision making on character liscensing. Han Solo should have been a high seller. So they predict Obi-Wan not being as big (Despite it having Ewan).
They don’t have a creative plan for Star Wars if that wasn’t obvious to anyone yet in 2022. They were planning releases Marvel style. It’s garbage management. They needed a creative plan that fits in the SW universe, like the EU already did.
>Solo flopped because it was bad & lore breaking.
So was the ST and it didn't flop
>So was the ST and it didn't flop
That's what a successful exit scam looks like
Maybe you're too young, but when Disney started rolling out their movie plans, "A Star Wars Story" was basically this whole slate of side movies they planned on making to fill the gaps the main Skywalker movies had. Unnecessarily, I might add.
Obi-Wan and Solo were supposed to be "A Star Wars Story" franchises. There were supposed to be initial movies, then assuming they did well (which Disney in their hubris assumed they would), we'd see sequels to them, like how Han met Jabba, or how Obi-Wan uh... also met Jabba on Tatooine or something.
>Unnecessarily, I might add.
Can you imagine how fricking inane it would be to produce "This Fricking Guy: A Terminator Story"?
>Dyson: The Terminator one, not the Vacuum Guy
The original “Obi-Wan” pitch to Lucasfilm had a three-story arc to capture the “three different evolutions” of McGregor’s Obi-Wan before the events of “A New Hope.” Beattie’s concept was for a “full trilogy” and actor McGregor had agreed to sign on. The first movie arc ultimately became the Disney+ series with the message of: “‘Surrender to the will of the Force. Transport your will, surrender your will. Leave the kid alone,'” per Beattie.
“The second [movie] was thinking about where Kenobi ends up,” Beattie shared. “And one of the most powerful and probably the most powerful moment in all of Obi-Wan’s story is that moment where he sacrifices himself in ‘A New Hope.’ Great moment, you know, makes you cry. But, if you stop and think about it, it’s a pretty sudden thing, to just kind of go be fighting a guy, to see Luke and go, ‘I’m gonna die.’ You know, that to me, that required forethought. That required pre-acceptance that this was going to happen.”
However, the second film script never went into development, as Lucasfilm axed the film project before Beattie could continue. With McGregor ready for “Obi-Wan Kenobi” Season 2, Beattie hopes his second movie ideas come to fruition in series form. “If I have anything to do with the second season of ‘Obi Wan,’ that’s the character evolution that I would take him on,” Beattie summed up.
And then they decided to ake a series about soe negress who thinks she's Darth Vader pursuing baby leia.
Disney are not stewards of mythology, they have no interest in the spiritual experience of the common man. It is odd to grow to hate a children's movie enterprise but I honestly see them as evil for the sake of evil at this point.
Cinematic Star Wars has been beneath contempt for decades. A New Hope and Empire being the high points. The Old Republic however is mostly the work of an inspired mind with a Masters in Theology and it is jaw-droppingly good, and totally respectful of Lucas' initial mission of creating a new mythology for young people to connect with in an increasingly soulless world.
Reading this synopsis of the Obi-Wan movie arc in contrast with that hunk of shit Disney just released on the internet is a tragedy that can only grow commensurate with the more eyes it commands.
There is a Platonic Ideal of Star Wars that is actually worthy of praise but the phenomneal truth of Star Wars is that its two good movies from the late 20th Century followed by decades of decadent profiteering horse shit.
>Great moment, you know, makes you cry.
No it doesn't, you barely know Obi-Wan by that point, it would only make you cry if you saw the prequel trilogy first. Just like if you're seeing Han die in Force Awakens after watching the OT, and that was the most horrible moment in all of Star Wars.
Yes it does.
>‘Surrender to the will of the Force. Transport your will, surrender your will. Leave the kid alone,
This didn't really come across in the series.
At least we only have to deal with one shitty series as opposed to three shitty movies. Maybe this will prompt Disney to do some soul searching about what they're doing wrong with the franchise, but probably not.
There'll be a season two, at least.
Is it already confirmed? Jesus christ
at least the movies don't look like trash. the only star wars show that doesn't look like garbage is the first season of The Mandalorian.
>At least we only have to deal with one shitty series as opposed to three shitty movies
Anon, I think your math is off on this one.
this story should have been about Obi Wan. No Leia, no Reva.
Well the numbers said it all
what did they say
Maclunkey
the numbers have spoken truth
TLJ killed Solo
>get paid to work on something
>get upset when the company that paid you for your work uses your work however they see fit
why are americans so pro-capitalism but also just completely moronic?
A key part of the western entertainment industry is to make people not think of it as an industry. There's a lot of money to be made in making people think of it as a social thing, virtue, fairness, equality, these are all terms to give certain people and buzz and someone like this has forgotten they where doing a job and it creates a lot of entitlement.
You have to watch my movie because I made it, you have to pay to see an aging actress whose made millions because sexism, you need to pay to see black people hate whites because virtue. Of course they often leave out that you are paying for this.
What a fricking babe. I would leave my wife of ten years and three kids to start a new life with her and my ICP profits.
I don't think they're mad from an economic standpoint but imagine you put your heart and soul into something and then left, someone else came later, fricked it all up with pointless revisions, and slapped your name on the end product. And everyone hated it.
Also I don't watch any of this shit and just hate Disney so it was probably horrible to begin with and perhaps even enhanced for the TV show. But it's not a capitalist thing to be angry about this imo use my work just leave my name off it if you're gonna change it around.
based jumping ship poster
>do Americans really?!?!?
You're on an American website shitposting to Americans about the American culture that you're pretending to not be obsessed with.
the United States is a big nation rich in natural resources. everything else follow from that.
why is this question based on americans being pro-capitalism? I keep seeing people on Cinemaphile say this as a diss or own, yet I am American and have never met a person in my life who is "pro-capitalism" everyone has criticisms and problems with it. No one say maybe corrupt millionares are waking up and just spouting how much they fricking love captialism and its blessings. No one does that.
Europoors and insane leftists pushing for more of the same. Its all so tiresome
>waking up and just spouting how much they fricking love captialism and its blessings
i do that
not an american though
Capitalism is a strawman invented by communists to make their desire to micromanage an entire economy seem not so insane
Or how about both are invented by insane sociopaths to wield power over everything
Centrists are the dumbest people
>muh pick a side
That isn't "centrist" you moron. It's literally telling you both sides are cancer BECAUSE there is a worse cancer behind it. bot both sides are cancer so it's a wash, which is the position centrists take. I'm not trying to compromise with you, homosexual. I'm literally calling you homosexual for picking a side when a israelite is puppeteer of both.
Capitalism isn't really a "side" though. It's just everything that isn't communism. Maybe if we were talking about corporatism, but "capitalism" is far too vague.
little-c capitalism, sure, insofar as it is closer to reality. But Capitalism™ is a "side" with all manner of >implications and I couldn't care less because "sides" are just growth medium for sociopaths and satanic israelites.
Depends what "Capitalism™" is.
>Capitalism™ is a "side"
Invented by communists (Nazis too) as a strawman to make their asses look less moronic
>muh little-c
>communism will work eventually, guys!
>it's just that everyone who ever tried it was a big meanie who didn't do it right!
>not that you have to be a megalomaniacal freak to even think about controlling an entire economy!
>also the corporate owner of a multi-billion dollar IP owes me a personal apology because they treated a character they own in a way I didn't like!
>literal schizo strawman babble apropos of nothing
>it's an unironic Nazi
Jews don't own the free market, butthole
You know that Hitler's "third path" is just communism with extra steps, right?
Nothing that is inextricably tied to a particular people and a particular land is "just" any ole' abstract de-humanized political ideology, friendo
Fair enough, but they can all get fricked at the end of the day if they don't put food on my table and make the trains run on time. Way past the point of debating "ideas" in good faith. That's boomer shit.
We already have fascism chud. Drink it in.
Reminder that intelligence agencies hire homosexuals so they can trap politicians of foreign nations in honeypots and that the British have been doing this for well over a century
RLM were right once again
Solo bombed because it was boycotted by enraged fans after TLJ. Why are they so endlessly in denial about this.
solo bombed because after TLJ people were disinclined to give another star wars movie a chance.
solo bombed because there was no han solo in the movie.
Han Solo’s character was never that great he wad carrier by Harrison Fords charisma.
Sauce: every knock off Han in any and all Scifi shows.
Crichton was pretty cool, he even pointed out to not compare him to any of those
Crichton isn’t a knockoff Han at all, he’s not even the Hotshot archetype
Crichton is too crazy to be a Han expy
John isn't a knock off of any sci-fi character, he's Crihton
No, Solo is a fun character. The way he's actually kind of a dumbass, but he talks himself up and gets by on charm is probably the best thing about him.
Rogue One is boring as frick. It just has one kind of good action scene. Jyn Erso has got to be the blandest protagonist ever in a Star Wars movie, and there's some good competition there. Frick Rogue One. I don't care how nice that one shot of the Death Star was.
>Starlord
>Captain Mal
also carried by the actors perhaps
If you think about it, Captain Jack Sparrow is just Han Solo.
damn you're right
Hey Beattie? Your ideas sound like shit and what we got was shit. Who are you anyway? How did you get the job of writing Star Wars scripts? Literally never heard of you.
We never needed nor wanted spinoff "prequel" movies for the characters. They would never be good especially since you're just making up shit based on one-off comments someone says in later movies. Disney should have just hired someone competent and passionate to maoe the Thrawn movies then adapt all nine of the X-Wing series. They'd have been raking in the cash with good content. Re-cast Han and Leia if you have to. Would have been FAR better than what they did.
I kind of like the RLM idea of just taking a character we don't know much about like Qui-Gon, and then just having some stand alone adventure that happens like thirty years before all of the other movies.
It's the way that everything just has to endlessly lead back into episode 4 that's so frustrating. We already know what's going to happen. The biggest surprise of Solo was what? That Han had a girlfriend when he was a kid?
Watching the Obi-Wan series I found that the character I was most interested in was Bail Organa, because oh yeah, we know basically nothing about that guy. What's he even like?
They haven't even mentioned his tax policies
Just a reminder to all you Last Jedi haters who took out your autistic rage on an unrelated movie: you did this.
>how dare you stop guzzling Disney's crap! You should say thank you and ask for seconds!
Disney are the ones with the Star Wars IP and the ones who decide which movies get made and which get turned into cheap shlock series. Don't like it? Buy the IP from them. You could probably get it at a discount.
>Kathleen hands typed this post
For what it's worth, Solo is probably the best movie Disney put out. It's still mediocre at best though. Everything about that phase of Star Wars deserved to fail, just on principle.
Nope, thats Rogue One
South Park guy with triangle dot jpeg
>Solo is probably the best movie Disney put out
it's just a pile of cliches and shit star wars impersonations, directed by a washed up hack.
Yeah, and that's the best thing Disney put out.
Besides The Last Jedi, but you Like worshippers won't stand for it
Last Jedi could have been good, but it ultimately didn't have the balls or the depth of writing to go anywhere with it's ideas. It's like a series of open doors to ideas that could have been interesting, which then get slammed in your face. Utterly frustrating movie (but not because Luke drank the mommy milkies. Only morons got mad about that).
It was part two of a trilogy. Seeing the story beats to their conclusion was the job of the finale. Not his fault you made hats out of your underwear and did the macarena because because you didn't like the direction he was going and made Disney do an about-face and bring back Jar Jar
>It was part two of a trilogy. Seeing the story beats to their conclusion was the job of the finale.
Imagine actually believing this.
Name one plot point that was resolved in The Empire Strikes Back
>Name one plot point that was resolved in The Empire Strikes Back
Luke's quest to avenge his father
The wampa
At least Deejay was a character who had an arc
Never returned either. Crazy
>Seeing the story beats to their conclusion
That's what the movie did though. It's been said a million times. Last Jedi should have ended with Rey joining forces with Kylo Ren, and and last of the Rebellion on the run. That would actually leave somewhere interesting to go with the third movie, instead of "lol Palpatine".
Last jedi is one of if not the gayest movies ever made
>you Like worshippers won't stand for it
I'm fine with the idea of hermit Luke, but the connective tissue for getting him from RotJ to TLJ (frankly the fault of TFA) sucks fat wiener and is just stupid, inane and generic darkness vs. lightness shit which was irrelevant going all the way back to ESB.
Leek, the short moronic farm boy who suddenly had the responsibility of training a whole academy of new Jedi, who had never seen a good character turn evil, getting the dumb idea to nip the evil in the bus with his laser sword, sucks fat wiener and is just stupid? Kind of shitty for it to happen off-screen, thanks Jar Jar, but out of character, for the kid who fell into an obvious trap and got his ass kicked so he could help muh friends?
I'm not going to try and make any sense of what you wrote here because I can't, but I wanted you to know that I at least read it.
In your brain, where other people would have the capacity to understand Luc as the flawed human being that he is, you just have a black void, eh?
Neither did Lando, or the Wampa for that matter.
>inb4 that Robot Chicken sketch where Loc meets the Wampa at a space gas station
Not canon no matter how much it should be
Lando did
Off-screen between the second and third part of the trilogy. Jar Jar took Deejay's role in the third and gave it to that big fat slug asset whose role got cut.
What
Read the script for the third movie written by Colin Trevarrow. Or rather watch Jenny's interpretation of the script.
>understand Luc as the flawed human being
every character with an arc has flaws, genius.
No arcs to be found here, sis
>Gets his ass handed to him by Vader, gets saved by Leia
>Gets his ass handed to him by the Emperor, gets saved by Vader
If Rian were to repeat this pattern he'd get his ass handed to him by Rey and get saved by the Emperor's force ghost
Neither of the things you listed here constitute an arc. It sounds more like your talking about power level as if we're discussing capeshit.
That's why the first line of the post denied the existence of any arcs
So are you saying Luke doesn't have an arc?
Yes, that's exactly what I said. Can't you read?
No I can read, but you have clearly been typing rapidly and I thought it might have been a mistake. I just needed to confirm that's what you actually meant so I knew for sure that you have no fricking idea what you're talking about.
You mean in the sequels right?
You can't read then
I didnt read your other posts because you are gay and may infect me with gayness
The completion of Luke's character arc in the original trilogy, was Luke showing compassion to his father, and refusing to kill him, despite all he had done.
I'm not even necessarily opposed to Luke failing, and that being a part of the set up for the new trilogy, but you need to do a little better than that.
That isn't a conclusion to an arc, that's just a thing that happens, an answer to a question nobody asked. Do you even know how arcs work? Obviously not if you thought Lick had one.
based moron
Vader is the one with an arc, Lark being the consistent foil against whom Vader can grow. Did you not watch the movies?
How is hotheaded farm boy becomes a man not an arc?
Because he doesn't
>Luke resisted temptation once, that means he has conquered temptation as a concept and will never think about doing bad things ever again
There originally was a 175 hour original cut of the movie where they graphically showed every instance of luke resisting temptation for the rest of his life. But it was unjustly scrapped. This is what they took from you, sheeple.
So, show how he gets from one place to the next. It's not satisfying to just say "okay, so thirty years later, he stands over his sleeping nephew with a sword, like a fricking psycho, and that's what happened". You can go there, but do the work, and make me feel like it isn't an asspull.
My suggestion would be that all it took was a moment of doubt in Luke to make Kylo go fully to the dark side. Isn't that better? That he failed to uphold the way of the Jedi, in his heart, and then all of that work came tumbling down?
>Luke showing compassion to his father, and refusing to kill him, despite all he had done.
It's more like seeing how even great people can be easily seduced by evil, recognizing that weakness in himself, and sacrificing his own life to allow his father to be the great man he always thought he was.
It's Ryan Johnson's fault. He purposefully set out to make a movie that would piss off half the viewers. What did they expect would fricking happen.
The finale was easily the best episode. Didn't care for what was going on with Reva. She should have died from the stab like everyone before. Also why kill the Grand Inquisitor just to bring him back to do nothing.
Solo should have just been a movie about Han going from a naïve kid to a ruthless pirate, and meeting Chewie. Maybe flesh out his time in the Empire a little more. That was the stuff about the movie that actually kind of worked. Lando Calrission and the Millennium Falcon all should have been left for a potential sequel.
I don't know how stories work: the post
Ditto every other post you autists make on this board
How is having the Millennium Falcon appear in a movie a story? If I want to know anything, I want to know what events in this guy's life made him the man he is, and how his particular relationship with Chewie developed. I don't need to see the ship he flies ten years later. It's irrelevant. I don't need to see him get his gun or his name either.
>I want to know what events in this guy's life made him the man he is, and how his particular relationship with Chewie developed.
ffs WHY????
He's a simple archetype / stereotype
I don't need to know how the sausage is made
Why do homosexuals want to ruin everything for themselves by knowing too much fffuuuck!
They're already making the movie (which itself is a bad idea). There are ways to do that better than what they did.
You need to make the thing a good story in it's own right, not just an endless series of callbacks to things we've already seen. A story about a naïve kid being initiated into a life of crime, and developing a friendship with a bear monster after he rescues him from slavery, is at least something.
Doing "the Kessel Run" because fans know what that is, and having a sassy lesbian robot become the brain of the Millennium Falcon is the opposite of a satisfying story.
Some of the best "origin stories" ever told were where the younger version really bears no surface resemblance to the older version. The connection is mostly circumstantial and done through themes and slight mannerisms meant to reinforce those themes. The Godfather with Di Nero and Brando is a prime example.
Because, surprise, it's just Batman Begins like 50% of every film that has come out over the last decade and a half.
I still haven't see the Rise of Skinwalker
Based. I pirated it and watched it in a side window and it still wasted 2 hours
me neither and I hope I never see it
>boo hooo poor me
>my shitty 2 hour waste of time was adapted into a 6 hour meandering piece of crap
>and I only got credited while still getting consistent work as a writer despite being a fricking hack!
How am I supposed to feel about this?
JUST
>...and It's a Good Thing
This is actually true. Star Wars was at its peak before the PT came out.
>your movie franchise doesn't need movies
Star Wars should be an event, not a cookie cutter soulless MCU release schedule
Even the "event" shit is kind of fake. The mythologisation of Star Wars as this "important" cultural thing, is almost as much a part of the problem as anything. It insists upon itself.
Can we just get some good movies, that don't feel like they're completely cynical, and made according to a basic blueprint?
Star Wars at it's core is about taking very old stories, and making them new again, through the lens of science fiction, so let's do that. Pick a story, maybe the Odyssey, or Hamlet, or Saint George and the Dragon, and add blasters and space ships, and see where you end up. I'm so tired of the Empire, and the Rebellion, and the Jedi, and the Death Star and the Skywalkers, all being done over and over again.
Here's a plot: on the planet of Ziplippi, Blast Bumberclumps, son of Egron the lasersmith, has to defeat a Zaglon beast that is terrorizing his village, before the night of the Clem festival, when the mushroom people rise from the earth to share their golden nectar.
Make it. Go.
I would be embarrassed to be associated with this shit in any way.
Their mistake was considering a fricking Solo movie before Obi-Wan.
>Joby [Harold] came on and took my scripts
Joby is the word for a poo in scotland
why couldn't they just make the two hour movie and release it on Disney+? It seems like quantity of content is more important than quality.
>Joby [Harold] came on and took my scripts and turned it from two hours into six
That explains a lot actually
maybe im just not smart but how does making KENOBI into a SHITTY TV SHOW better than if it had been SHITTY MOVIE? instead of making it into a tv show instead of a movie, why come didnt they just make it NOT SHITTY?
Tv allows it to be shitty and get away with it
Solo bombed because TLJ was so bad.
They aren't mentioning the 3rd part because that would have involved Darth Maul and they still want to do that storyline.
The comics have sort of done all that with Crimson Dawn and qira
No one but incels and black woman read the comics
Sorry George
How to Watch Star Wars
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj4aoZ43d9T8jo0k7LQe65J3G5JAo6VDF
His desire for even better special effects does not excuse han breaking his neck sideways and shooting second.
Pretty typical formula for disney. Hire talented people, fire them, use their work but throw away all the stuff that makes it good, then turn the project into a low budget shit fest written and acted by a bunch of low level hacks. Then act super surprised that nobody likes it.
Yes, it's the viewers fault, not the fact that it's all shit.
Well you're a fricking hack, Stuart.
Literally 4 years ago they cancelled all the films because last jedi sucked...
Nobody remembers that?
Make a new trilogy set 30-40 years after sequels; old Kylo (who somehow survived) is Palpatine like character in a bright futuristic republic.no deserts
>Make a new trilogy
The sequels, all their characters, and the actors are done. DOA. They're going to milk the aging original and prequel actors for all they're worth and then reboot the entire shebang with a new "original trilogy"
worst idea ive heard yet. not just about star wars, just the worst idea of anything ive ever heard.
>Joby [Harold]
This dude is absolute shit, he's done nothing except one shitty Hayden Christensen movie that nobody saw.
Until we get an actual definition of capitalism in here, this is nothing but hot air, and people talking past each other.
I wish that Disney was half as hard on its "sequel trilogy" as it is on Solo. That movie, for whatever reason, has become the whipping boy of the series, even though it is probably the best Star Wars *movie* that Disney has made with the only possible exception being Rogue One. I'm not saying it's a great movie, but at the very least it's better than Episodes 7, 8, and 9, yet this is probably the 4th or 5th time I've seen them try to blame Solo for "ruining" all of their plans with the Star Wars series.
It's easy. Solo was the only movie they made with a male lead. They want it to be the worst one. They also really don't want to admit they made any mistakes with the sequel trilogy, and the brand may have been irreparably damaged because of basedboys and feminist bitterness. Easier to just say Solo was bad, for some undisclosed reason and try to move on.
bob igor: solo failed cause released close to TLJ
kathleen kennedy: solo failed cause of recasting
why does the media let her get away with it?
No idea. She seems completely inept.
I knew Ben Kenobi, he Was The Best Jedi In The Galaxy And A Cunning Warrior. I Understand That You've Become Quite A Good Pilot Yourself. And He Was A Good Friend.
God damn I hate RLM now. How the same people who made those plinkett videos are now sitting around "hurrr I liked it" and half ass b***hing is beyond me. Being paid off would be better than them having completely lost their edge.
Even though the problem is clearly not enough transgender or pansexual roles and role play they still just ignore it.
Why are they so keen on blaming solo, but literally none of their other content.
Solo gets alot of flack, their decision not to cast new actors in legacy roles supposedly came from Solo but I don't see how that makes sense, Alden was great.
Same. Film takes all the flack for no reason
>no reason
They needed a scapegoat and blamed the actors. Rogue One was also very stupid but they weren't recasting roles so somehow it gets a pass
Why not? I thought at this point Disney had a fetish for making shittiest possible Star Wars media and making nerds watch it. Are they finally losing money?
Is she called Leilita?
Solo was going to be the first movie in an adaptation of Shadows of the Empire, but that was intentionally sabotaged from higher up by snubbing it with the May release instead of December
well then they should have hired the look alike kid for the role instead of doing that israeli nepotism for the lead
>make a shitty movie nobody asked for
>how could this have happened? Now we can’t make the thing fans wanted 🙁
Frick Disney
>tfw we will never get spiritual journey Star Wars kino in the style of Divine Comedy/Pilgrim's Progress as Obi Wan learns the secrets of the Force with Qui Gon and how to transcend
Solo was actually pretty good, except the guy who played solo not looking at all like him. I even liked the sassy black lady bot