Oh, good. Someone compiled every sinfest comic put out in the last 15 years.
Seriously tho…I’ve never seen an artist go so positively mental, with such narcissistic assurance, in such an irrevocably delusional state.
Whatever tat has been doing to himself since the big breakup all those years ago it is not healthy.
If you read some of the comics you can tell he ALMOST gets it. The trike feminists are repulsive and ultimately empty preachers. The patriarchy exists only as an imagined world when characters submit themselves to personal bias. Moniques’ perpetual hostility is getting her message nowhere. Slick has been living in perpetual misery for so long even Jessie Pinkman would want the guy to catch a break. You can see that he doesn’t really have much respect for authoritarian feminism, deep down he knows it doesn’t work because sinfest has been a mean spirited shit show ever since he started trying to crowbar it in. He won’t, he can’t admit the central thesis that his comic is trying to espouse but ultimately contradicts because authoritarian femism doesn’t fricking work,
Sinfest just makes me sad, with a dash of mad. Authoritarian feminism and an unhinged egocentric author made for the ruin of a perfectly good webcomic.
What ever happened to the boy who used to be the main character
His internet persona became real and started ruining his life more than his manipulative c**t of a former friend.
Projection much?
He's a conservative now though
No. He’s just anti-trans.
The TERFS and conservatives tend to see eye to eye on Trans people being too confusing to their agenda.
Just good old fashion horseshoe theory at work.
>confusing
so much projection in one statement you should charge admission and sell popcorn.
Dude, he's straight up repeating QAnon b.s. with no hint of irony. It happens to all TERFs, because those pricks are more concerned with upholding gender norms to be actual feminists.
https://xtramagazine.com/power/far-right-feminist-fascist-220810
The real kicker is that this isn't even getting him much of that sweet alt-right grift money. His Patreon used to make about $1250 a month, now it's bringing in just under $750
is this an actual comic he made, this is ben garrison levels lol
Well at least with this kind of comic you can parse agendas.
Bilderburgs: bunch of rich buttholes established by the OSS trying to shape politics with money and the US Army along with NATO. Not a hoax. Max Blumenthal did some great reporting on their latest meeting in DC where the shit down the entire hotel and banned reporters.
LEx Leather: just more sex shaming from Tat. BDSM is a common kink. The moneyed elite don’t own it…they just own the islands where they practice it.
Pfizer: after the Democratic Party started mandating the untested RNA immunotreatment their stock expanded geometrically. Their vaccine has injured people but they are exempt from legal action. Frick ‘em.
Administers: maybe this is referring to social media sites which are deliberately censoring counter narrative opinions. Not a hoax. Censorship and political bans are a huge problem.
Gender Ridler: I told you, he’s a TERF.
You’re no true Scotsman fallacy is of no use here. Someone can be a TERF, not a conservative and think the bilderburgs, the oligarchs, the pharmaceutical cartel and the surveillance state are all FRICKED.
>TERFs just want to uphold gender norms
>trannies tell demure boys and assertive girls that they need to be chemically castrate because they’re the wrong gender
No matter how obnoxious, trannies are wrong on this, every time. Corporate sponsored monsters who are destroying lives to support their delusions
>I have to make shit up in my head so I can shit on minorities
At least you admit you're obnoxious. Also, it's c**ts like you who are "Corporate sponsored monsters"
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/the-american-dark-money-behind-europes-far-right/
This strip came days after the latest school shooting. Just in case anyone was in doubt that Tats is a complete piece of shit these days.
Denying reality won't make people like you freaks, YWNBAW
>Denying reality won't make people like you freaks
I don’t deny that their are dark forces pushing shit for the right, why do you deny that their are dark forces pushing children to castrate themselves? Why do you think that no big pharma company would have a vested interest in idiots like you getting pointless surgeries and being hooked on countless hormones and drugs to enforce your delusions? How much money goes into making a troony? 50,000? 100,000? You spread that out among the .01% of the population that trannies ARE that’s a decent amount of money, but I bet you their are more idiots who are easily susceptible to propaganda, and would convince THEMSELVES that the uncertainty that comes with growing up needs to be medicated out of them, and I bet you that SKYROCKETS the PROFITS for these castration procedures.
You speak the truth ! Thank you.
Too based for a feminist
>gender norms
>gender
>norms
>alt-right grift money
>Hate fact about trans bottom surgeries are potentially a multi-billion dollar industry larger than the automotive industry.
Get groomed idiot.
But anon, now autogynephiles have the freedom to get into hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt or pay that much with your taxes to get erroneous, grotesque, dangling skin grafts or eternally-open wounds that let them jerk off more immersively when watching toddlers at the playground.
>Just good old fashion horseshoe theory at work.
lol more like "reasonable people on both sides" theory
Symetric double dubs on your post confirm !!!
Groomers gonna groom
Child groomers getting uppity again because it's "their month"
Hopefully people get sick of your shit and start throwing you off buildings like they do in Saudi Arabia
You do know the child groomer narrative only exists as a distraction from having to acknowledge school shooting right? Its a means by which pundits on the right side of the aisle deflect having to discuss or argue that issue. Why do you think it only ever gets brought up after a school shooting?
And you morons are the ones calling other people "glowies" when you're happily getting painted with Radon on the daily.
despite being 1.5% of the population, homosexuals make up more than 60% of child molesters
Source?
>Convicted
Thats the key word. Societal stigmas against homosexuals mean juries have an easier time convicting them than, say, a woman molesting a kid. Theres no actual correlation between sexual orientation and being a molester.
"muh social stigma" isn't a get out of jail free card out of the argument, you still have to support your claim.
You're going back in the closet gay. Better make room.
The 1980's
Thats a decade, not a source.
I have a genuine question: Why do you care? Like, actually for real why do you care so much about trans people?
>I have a genuine question: Why do you care? Like, actually for real why do you care so much about trans people?
why do you care?
I have the capacity for extending my mind into the shoes of someone else, and also know several trans people. Empathy, understanding, trying to get to know what other people experience, etc.
What i dont get, is why you care so much? Why not just ignore them?
"just ignoring" a problem allows it to grow
large corporations and politicians preying on children is a problem
corporations and politicians preying on children is a problem
Yes. Correct. And they have a much more effective and easier time targeting non-trans people for things other than LGBT issues.
>empathetic
>delusional freaks
What is being taught to children exactly?
Why are you not this engaged about states passing genitalia inspection bills?
Its convenient to his political worldview not to acknowledge it.
Wouldn't be happening if trans people weren't co-opting female sports
We have actually gotten to the point where you idiots defend penis inspection day. Holy frick.
The thing about the right is all their policies are fundamentally awful and they require people dehumanizing each other to work. Regular genital inspection for participating in sports or using public bathrooms is just par for the course.
I'm never going to kill myself, but if you're going to remember to do it BEFORE you shoot up the school and not after.
>The thing about the right is all their policies are fundamentally awful and they require people dehumanizing each other to work.
name one cause left wing polices include >killing babies
>forcing kids to learn about sexuality in pre k
>destroying middle class families
>racism
>big government
>defunding the police
>taking away peoples rights to defend themselves
>not taking responsibility for any mistakes
>destroying the economy in service to the climate change insanity
>holding up criminals and killers as heroes and martyr
>destroying peoples freedoms
>Muh baby killing
Get new material.
why when the old material is still very true and useful
Ah yes, because one to four trans athletes in the entire fricking state really is such a cataclysmic problem that we need to make a law to allow inspection of children’s genitalia.
>Th-they're the real Groomers
lmao
Kinda sounds they are when they literally make laws to allow them to look at your kid’s private parts because… *checks notes* …it’s “necessary” before allowing them to compete in sports.
>Its okay to root around in a childs pants as long as it conforms to MY political world view!
Because I'm empathetic have the capacity to extend my mind into the shoes of someone else, so understand its better for trannies to understand that they are delusional freaks who need genuine help.
>delusional freaks
Truly empathetic.
No, Anon, you're an butthole with controlling tendencies.
and you will never be a woman
Very empathetic. Definitely not a psychpath.
>Why not just ignore them?
Because I see what is being taught to children today and I reel at the thought of raising my own under such regime.
Because Transgenders are becoming the newest/easiest shill/puppet for the government to use against people. Transgenders can only exist in a vacuum of state funding for both their HRT, Surgeries, Medication, and other various therapies. They'll parrot anything the government or fake woke corps say as long as they feel "heckin' valid" along with getting their newest Dilator courtesy of Big Pharma.
They're farm to table spineless shills to the slaughter on the Taxpayer dime and the corps/government have prolapsed every movement they've been attached to inside out because of how dependent Transgenders are to the powers that be.
You said a lot of Tucker Carlsonisms and i managed to interpret none of that as a coherent argument towards anything.
You're admitting that you can't read Anon? I'm sorry for your disability but Reddit is down the hall.
>Tucker Carlsonisms
you are hopeless
bottom of my heart sincere non-trolling, you have been soul-raped
rendered a drone incapable of critical thinking
Okay, moron, lemme go through it then.
>Because Transgenders are becoming the newest/easiest shill/puppet for the government to use against people.
This is meaningless, its a bogeyman based on negative-language interpretations of general concepts. You essentially just said "Trans Bad" but filtered through conspiratorial viewpoints.
>Transgenders can only exist in a vacuum of state funding for both their HRT, Surgeries, Medication, and other various therapies.
Except medicine is by and large privatized in the united states and almost all medical procedures are entirely dependent on insurance and loans. This is true for trans people too, you idiot.
>They'll parrot anything the government or fake woke corps say as long as they feel "heckin' valid" along with getting their newest Dilator courtesy of Big Pharma.
Ad hominem aside, this is a generalization thats also not true from what i've seen at all. Trans people, as part of the general LGBT movement, are highly DISTRUSTFUL of the government and often take stances that are opposed by both political parties ie: European style socialist concepts.
Not to mention, assuming you're right wing, the right wing sect of the US do the exact same thing but when republicans are in charge and in regards to Fox. Its hypocritical.
>They're farm to table spineless shills to the slaughter on the Taxpayer dime and the corps/government have prolapsed every movement they've been attached to inside out because of how dependent Transgenders are to the powers that be.
This is meaningless and, again, not even true, not to the extent you're implying anyway.
>This is meaningless, its a bogeyman based on negative-language interpretations of general concepts.
It is an observed fact that the fad of transexuality is an extremely large money-maker. See
Groups like Pfizer (and similar med-pushing corporations) absolutely want transexuality to be seen as hip & want people paying for it their entire lives. This isn't debatable. It makes them massive amounts of cash even with the very, very small amount of trannies existing today. You even recognize this in your second rebuttal where you acknowledge it's all very privatized (though that doesn't exactly dismiss the reality that insurance companies are also in on the racket.)
>Ad hominem aside, this is a generalization thats also not true from what i've seen at all. Trans people, as part of the general LGBT movement, are highly DISTRUSTFUL of the government and often take stances that are opposed by both political parties ie: European style socialist concepts.
It doesn't matter what your opinions are when you can't go a week without relying upon their resources. You can "believe" whatever you want, you are still a domesticated Black person-cattle who can't simply leave a society you don't approve of. Most people (especially trannies) are on such a volatile wienertail of expensive medication that any Uncle Ted-like fantasies immediately go out the window because, obviously, abruptly stopping those meds would either kill you or drive you to such unimaginable agony that you'd come crawling back. Your argument unironically boils down to "we aren't oppressed because sometimes people can advocate communism on Twitter!"
>the right wing sect of the US do the exact same thing but when republicans are in charge and in regards to Fox
The right-wing doesn't exist. It's all kosher at the very top, they all collaborate. If only you knew how bad things really are, groomer.
Please, please for the love of god, take your meds.
This is actual schizo shit. You are literally quoting a schizophrenic who jumped in front of a train.
What's schizoshit? Transexuality from a young age being a massive money-maker? The reality that someone on tons of meds can't cut them cold turkey and divorce themselves from society? The fact that your opinions as a pleb don't actually matter? Rich people collaborating to remain wealthy and powerful? Where's the lie, anon? You aren't just washing your hands of the discussion because you realize you ran out of arguments, right?
A treatment is always going to be more profitable than a cure.
>No longer exists in any meaningful way
>who is Micheal Parenti
>who is Richard Wolff
>what is the WSWS
>what is the Qiao Collective
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/02/21/proj-f21.html
It's heavily repressed and obscured, but it absolutely exists.
Pic related anon, trannies aren’t the heart of the problem but they support, and are supported by, gross over reaches by the medical industry
The solution is making medicine a government funded public institution paid via tax and not a privatized industry
>my government has fricked up everything they touch
>so I want to totally rely on them for medical advice
Why would having the government DIRECTLY funneling money into big pharma (even more so than they already do) be a solution now?
Because then it has fricking oversight, you moron.
So do the military and the intelligence agencies anon, did that solve all of the problems they present?
Its better than literally nothing.
No, not really? They're not federally funded. Its a privatized institution which means a significant amount of shit does not apply to them. Other than base-level legalities, they have free reign.
>Its a privatized institution which means a significant amount of shit does not apply to them. Other than base-level legalities, they have free reign.
You don't know anything about how these corporations work. They don't have "free reign", there is a very strict list of laws and standards they must abide by.
Laws and standards which are lax compared to if they were federally funded.
How do you still not get that a socialized medical industry would be better for the general population than a privatized one? At least you wouldnt get fricking assmurdered from a god damn ambulance ride costing $3,000 before you even step foot in the hospital.
>Laws and standards which are lax compared to if they were federally funded
There is nothing lax about the laws biopharma companies must adhere to. These companies spend MASSIVE amounts of money annually just keeping compliant. Look up what QC means and then frick off from this thread, you lack basic understanding of the topic and your communist homosexualry is nonsensical.
COMPARED.
COMPARATIVELY.
HOLY SHIT YOU IDIOT LEARN ENGLISH.
No, you don't fricking get it. The United States leads the world in regard to corporate standards. Your fantasy of companies running the country is delusional; these corporations must play by the government's rules or they are beyond fricked. Biopharma must absolutely answer the questions set in front of it by the government, annually, without fail. There is no nation on Earth that has stricter standards for corporations than the United States, from meat production to drugs and everything inbetween. Other countries base their SOPs and similar quality control shit off the things the United States does for this reason. You are fricking moronic and don't know anything, communist Black person.
>Your fantasy of companies running the country is delusional
These are the people telling you to "take your meds"
You think drug companies can just put whatever on the shelves and don't oblige strict standards when it comes to manufacturing and research. You aren't educated on this topic and aren't fit to discuss it, not even on a basic level.
You can open wikipedia right now for a comprehensive list of known, intentional frauds by pharmaceuticals, and the slaps on the wrist the've gotten as punishment.
>Your fantasy of companies running the country is delusional
>Lobbying
Bro I fricking kneel, this is some of the highest quality shitposting, guaranteed (you) replies I've ever seen in my life. 10/10
Do you think biopharmaceutical companies don't have federal oversight right now?
As long as they can be considered a commodity, not enough.
Do you have any idea how strict drug manufacturing SOPs actually are?
>Why would having the government DIRECTLY funneling money into big pharma (even more so than they already do) be a solution now?
>Government catering to private interests is evil and doomed to make shit worse
>Instead we should put private interests in charge of crisis response directly
Hmmm...
The reason the medical industry is fricked up right now is BECAUSE of “federal oversight” anon, Medicare and Medicaid fricked up the market place anon. I think their is certainly a place for government assistance, but we shouldn’t think that the solution to all of our problems is to give them the authority over all of our medical decisions
>just tax everyone's income by 80% bro
people cant even afford gas you absolutely moron
Socialized Healthcare costs less than insurance.
financing chicago's annual "weekend murder rate" through taxes would bankrupt any state
It already bankrupts people you goon. If you relieved the poor of economic pressures you'd see a lot less violent crime too.
>I have no idea how taxes work
Here, if its that big a problem, why not cut some money from military spending? We dont need atomic orbital death lasers.
>why not cut some money from military spending?
military spending does not exceed the budget for social services anymore, your jon lebowitz joke is 15 years out of date
spending does not exceed the budget for social services anymore, your jon lebowitz joke is 15 years out of date
Then medicine being tax-funded shouldnt be an issue. And if it is, just cut military. We spent 801 billion on the military last year, if we cut that down to just 600 billion, thats 200 billion for public health services.
Your military superiority is the only thing keeping you afloat on your listing "world superpower" status
>Just let the status slip
You don't really understand the geopolitical situation if you advocate this
>medicine being tax-funded shouldnt be an issue
again: if your taxes paid for social services like they do in norway, this country's Black person & illegal population would bankrupt you within a year
Sociopath moment.
sometimes i wish this board had IDs so i could track just how many arguments you've lost in an hour span
Being able to state facts in cold blood is being a sociopath now?
>Its the minorities fault, not that poverty pushes results in high crime rates, and historical precedent result in minorities being in poverty more often than not.
>So dont fix something which would contribute to easing poverty.
>Its the minorities fault, not that poverty pushes results in high crime rates, and historical precedent result in minorities being in poverty more often than not
yes
Black folk are bad in literally every nation
just throwing money/government oversight at an issue does not fix it
cope eternally
No, he's absolutely right.
You already tried to do that before, when you tried to completely collapse all social services by offering them to the entire continent at the impossible expense of the country's working class.
You are evil, and there is zero moral qualm in killing you.
When.
Do asians have a significant historical precedent for being marginalized and forced into poverty to the same degree and scale as Blacks?
>Do asians have a significant historical precedent for being marginalized and forced into poverty to the same degree and scale as Blacks?
Yes, during WWII, when they were forced into concentration camps, long after slavery had ended.
Which is why the state we're at has changed from killing you being morally justifiable to a moral obligation.
>>Yes, during WWII, when they were forced into concentration camps, long after slavery had ended.
Thats... Not comparable at all? Are you moronic? Re-read what i asked you.
I reread your shitpost, and have concluded that you will never, ever be a woman.
What? School shootings are a result of our hopeless, over medicated, under appreciated society. That being a problem and corporations targeting children for dangerous procedures are tangentially related at best, BOTH are evil anon and BOTH are pushed onto the mentally feeble for the purposes of making the world worse.
>over medicated
American healthcare means most people can't even afford meds lmao
Drugs are easier to get than you think, but it’s true, the bulk of school shootings are results of targeted propaganda by the FBI
Wouldn't be as much of an issue if you guys actually ate your vegetables instead of junk food
>What? School shootings are a result of our hopeless, over medicated, under appreciated society.
Yes, thats a large contributing factor, but the solutions often presented by, say, Fox, or republicans, is often nonsense bullshit that just factors into their own political agendas (putting more cops in schools when they cant even respond to months of early warnings or bother going in when a shooter is executing children) or whathaveyou.
The left blames guns and dah ebil rightos, the right blames social divergencies and duh ebil leftos. The reality is far more nuanced than this and owes a lot to systemic societal issues that more relate to poverty and the degradation of democracy thats been occurring since the 60s (which, i want to point out, is not a "YEAH ITS DA DEMS FAULT" issue, its a problem perpetuated by the republicans that the dems feed into for their own gain, a bipartisan cycle of being partisan for financial benefit).
>corporations targeting children for dangerous procedures are tangentially related at best
Anon, they dont do that. Literal schizo conspiracy shit. Corporations only showcase superficial levels of support to try and get more customers, thats all. They're not left, they're not right, they're just stat sheets and boardrooms going over quarterlies.
Reality isnt a Metal Gear plot, its mainly boring shit that builds up slowly.
Historically, the alphabet agencies do have a habit of inciting violence. Latin America knows all too well.
Murdoch glowie.
>Reality isnt a Metal Gear plot, its mainly boring shit that builds up slowly.
Cinemaphile is basically the worst board to try to get this point across because many people here were unironically raised by fictional media instead of a family
Both trannies and school shooters are simply the problems of our world expressing themselves. They’re BOTH problems and they’re BOTH pushed by government in order to make the population divided and weak. Simply because one inflicts outward pain on the world and the other inflicts inward pain onto themselves and their families didn’t mean one or the other isn’t evil, frick you could easily say that BOTH are reflections of our broken education system that supports breaking and indoctrinating children. simply stating that the right “is more wrong” while ignoring all of the other problems doesn’t make you enlightened anon, it just means you have a soft spot for inward violence over our ward violence, I want BOTH problems dealt with, and trust me they’re BOTH problems of equal importance
The problem with your whole stance on the "Trans" shit is the solutions is evident but fought against, which is affirmation and proper medical guidance through the process. Social stigma, legislation from the right, etc. are what result in that oft repeated suicide stat, for example.
There ARE bad actors who take advantage of that movement, dont get me wrong, but throwing the entirety of them under the bus is also not the right call. In the same that that shootings wont be solved by attempting more frivolous gun legislation, its superficial band-aid solutions to what in reality are nuanced and complex problems requiring a delicate hand and empathetic heart.
>Social stigma, legislation from the right, etc. are what result in that oft repeated suicide stat, for example.
Unironically have a nice day you disgusting cryptoisraelite. Book burnings need to happen again with you on top of the pile.
Oh, right. I forgot. Its 2016 + 6. Why did i even bother trying to talk like i was speaking to a rational human being capable of being functional in the real world.
the clownworld is real.
This is truly the worst timeline.
What the frick even is a "cryptoisraelite"?
I have no bloody Idea.
I wanna go back, Anon. Take me back. We need to escape clown world.
There is no going back. There is only the merrygoround of reality. And Meulin...Meulin is eternal. We have to accept it. Embrace the Meulin Clownery.
>In the same that that shootings wont be solved by attempting more frivolous gun legislation
Gun legislation would at least try to do something about the lax accessibility issue instead of of things like “we just need MORE guns” or saying the solution is having less doors in school. The assault weapons ban alone proved it helps to lower gun deaths.
>The assault weapons ban alone proved it helps to lower gun deaths.
You are delusional.
>Defines mass shootings as mass killings to flatten the data into the ground
>Uses mass killings instead of gun deaths, the claim, or gun murders, another relevant claim
Yeah, when the data proves you wrong, you REALLY have to stretch to make a narrative that suits you.
Stalinism wasn't considered Bolshevism.
>dismisses data through pilpol
you've been clocked
you are pic related
"Assault Weapons" dont exist, though, Anon. The reality of those bans is they target superficial aesthetic features of firearms (Black=Scary. Rail-Systems=Evil, even if a wood-furnished rifle of equivalent caliber and even model can do the same damage, it wont be covered under the same legislation). Even then also it doesnt really even matter, one of the largest mass shootings, Virginia Tech, was done with just two handguns. More efficient measures would be wait times, background check improvements, as well as attempting to course-correct wealth inequality and actually getting the cops to not be morons and do their jobs instead of eating donuts and killing black people for funsies.
Yes Anon, when you tell people to go kill themselves after making them miserable for years and enabling a depressive spiral, they are, in fact, likely to kill themselves. Big Shock.
>Ted Cruz
He's a moron, i hope you're not defending him.
1. Gender reassignment surgery does not make you a woman, it turns you into a repulsive deformed mutant who has to perform grotesque "maintenance" several hours every day and places you in enormous medical debt as well as forcing you to regularly take medication. These things are going to weigh more heavily on someone's psyche than any amount of negative comments on the internet. Such comments also don't exist in real life because discriminating against trannies so openly will get you fired from your job, sued, etc.
2. Even if bullying did somehow magically account for a majority of troony suicides, I'm glad it did and will proudly say I'm happy I convinced them to kill themselves. I hope you do the same. Your soul deserves to burn.
>Social stigma, legislation from the right, etc. are what result in that oft repeated suicide stat, for example.
this guy is really trying to blame all troony suicides on bullying and ted cruz
Studies prove that social acceptance, etc. directly results in less suicides. Because currently being trans means you’re more likely to end homeless, you can get fired for being trans, you face higher risk of violence and sexual assault because society actively vilifies and marginalizes you.
>Social acceptance
We normal people are getting burnt out on being told we have to accept sickness, pathology, and degeneracy. You're only just now beginning to see the backlash.
I predict within two years being that refusing to tolerate queerness AND refusing to submit to the media's endless struggle sessions where you're told what a horrible Hitler you are will be such a popular political stance that the culture will inevitably follow suit.
I hope you're enjoying you're current time in the spotlight, because the queer movement has already peaked. Just like being treansgender itself, it's only gonna get worse from here.
The problem that makes both of them connected is the half hearted solutions that are come up with by government to deal with them, with either pointless restrictive gun legislation (that won’t pass) or by litigating parents in how they’re allowed to interact with their own children. Now I believe that gender dysphoria exists, and SOME adults find transitioning a legitimate treatment, but the problem is the amount of adults who need that treatment is STAGGERINGLY low compared to the amount that do get it. You NEED to be able to challenge trannies on this, not because “they’re evil” but because a massive undertaking they’re going through needs to be properly confronted and vetted to see if they can deal with what they’re doing to themselves. There is NEVER a purpose to stopping puberty, and telling children that they can is wrong and short sighted. Any treatment for dysphoria has to be consented by the adult who wants to get said treatment, letting a mom torture her child for internet points is not something that should ever be allowed
>because a massive undertaking they’re going through needs to be properly confronted and vetted to see if they can deal with what they’re doing to themselves.
That’s literally the social transition phase that is a long term project. Puberty blockers allow kids to have the space and time to figure shit out instead of having puberty run its course and adding to your dysmorphia.
Puberty blockers stop development of more than just their genitals anon, it prevents brain development, skeletal and muscle development and organ growth. It is NOT something that can be stopped and started on a dime, telling children that the uncertainty they feel growing up means they’re sick and need medication is EVIL and proves that you don’t have ANYONES best interest at heart other than the maintaining of your own empty delusions.
Why are adults (who aren't even their parents) making major and invasive biological decisions on behalf of children? What benefit is there to directly impeding, interrupting and simply ruining a child's natural development until they "pick a side" on this politically-fueled gender question, all while racking up immense debt to biopharmaceutical companies?
Who are these adults? Any medical decision require’s the parents’ permission.
The benefit is to the child so they don’t have to go through puberty which only adds to their sense of dysmorphia. The entire reason for puberty blockers is to delay it and give the kid time to figure their shit out.
>The benefit is to the child so they don’t have to go through puberty which only adds to their sense of dysmorphia. The entire reason for puberty blockers is to delay it and give the kid time to figure their shit out.
1. Puberty is not just the growth of sexual characteristics, it involves skeletal growth, organ growth, etc. and by impeding these things you will irreversibly frick people up for life. This makes them reliant on expensive medication.
2. Kids "don't need to figure shit out" with regards to gender by an extremely large margin, on average you only see gender dysphoria in children who are sexually abused. Children who grow up with these cognitive impairments (depression, gender confusion, etc.) overwhelmingly grow up to become reliant on expensive medication.
3. Children are not capable of consent in any regard, which means they aren't "figuring out" anything until they are at least 18. Not only does this make the liberal use of puberty blockers harmful, it also means they are essentially having major decisions made on their behalf by adults. These adults (who we can observe don't always have the best intentions at heart) force these kids to become reliant on expensive medication.
Encouraging children to "question their gender" is predatory shit. People are correct to label you as a groomer. The Nazis were correct to burn your books and drive you out of society.
its funny how it all rolls back to peddling expensive meds
let's look at how much of pfizer's top executives are israelites
>Anon believes in chemically castrating children
Delay implies you can just hop right back on after you get of the blockers which obviously won't happen.
It's worked wonders for Michael Jackson, he turned out fine. lmao
>The entire reason for puberty blockers is to delay it and give the kid time to figure their shit out.
This shit is literally peddled by old trans people who whish to live vicariously through others.
They think "If only I had started early I would really look like a girl!" Without understanding that you shouldn't be making such life altering decisions as a fricking child.
I understand the "dilemma", the "best" moment to transition is before puberty, but ask yourself about the things you wanted or believed as a child, and if you should have been allowed to make irrevocable lifetime decisions back then?
>Without understanding that you shouldn't be making such life altering decisions as a fricking child.
Puberty blockers are reversible until the late teens. Going through puberty is a life altering decision.
Anon i'm like, all for trans people and shit, but you're not doing yourself any favors.
>Going through puberty is a life altering decision.
It's not a decision at all you mong. Puberty blockers also don't "make you" whatever gender you "decided on" since there's countless other facets of your biological existence that will ensure you are one of two genders.
>It's not a decision at all you mong.
In a world where puberty blockers exist it is.
Cry moar
>thinks a natural biological process is a "decision"
>"c-cry moar"
you are moronic
>thinks a natural biological process is a "decision"
>Delaying puberty is a decision
>Going through puberty immediately isn't
>Binary choice
Explain how one half of a choice is a decision and the other isn't? Make it make sense.
>osteoporosis
>Going through puberty is a life altering decision
>going through puberty
>a decision
they fricking are not, the chemicals they use to castrate sex offenders they use on little girls and boys, why is this even a conversion, dont groom fricking little kids, let them be fricking kids, keep your religion and sexual ideology away from them
>dont groom fricking little kids,
You're confusing trans people with organized religion and the Scouts.
nope the same thing, dont fing groom kids, if you are found to be pushing your sick degeneracy on kids your should be thrown in jail
I genuinely don't think you know what grooming is or what it entails. Facebook has rotted a lot of people's brains. Google is your friend.
and a rope is yours
Are the groomers in the room with us right now?
Nope, same cancer, different stage
Let me guess, you also think vaccines are evil because few of them contain mercury?
didnt say that groomer
>Going through puberty is a life altering decision.
Puberty isn’t a “decision” anon it is a biological constant across all mammals. Assuming that your literal fad of a viewpoint is as important as the lung heart and brain development of a child is a legitimate sickness. I’d say you need help, but you’re just evil, pushing children who don’t understand the ramifications of their decisions to stop a wonderful evolution of themselves for your own selfish ends is something that I will never consider not evil. It’s SICKENING how supported your evil corporate viewpoint is
>Puberty isn’t a “decision” anon it is a biological constant across all mammals
So's pissing. Doesn't mean you can't put off taking a leak.
I mean I'm assuming you can't. I know some people have trouble with that.
So you ARE just an empty evil homosexual who wants to hurt everyone to support your own empty decisions you were propagandized into making. Frick
And if I stitch your urethra shut because "peeing gives me anxiety" I'm pretty sure your renal system will be damaged sooner than later.
>And if I stitch your urethra shut because "peeing gives me anxiety" I'm pretty sure your renal system will be damaged sooner than later.
I've got 2 urethras, so nah. And that's the problem with assuming everyone is the same as you. Some people fricking aren't.
Monique is no longer a lesbian because that would require sexualizing women, the greatest evil.
>Puberty blockers are reversible until the late teens.
In this case, "reversible" means "we didn't completely incapacitate your endocrine system, so it will be able to shamble back into function... eventually maybe" not "You'll be just as good as if nothing happened"
Trans kids usually know something is off about them at a fairly young age. And all your “it’s just a phase!” concern trolling is addressed by them given time to figure it out as they socially transition.
How much do want to bet this anon can't even define woman?
That's like saying steroid abuse only causes your body to temporarily stop producing testosterone naturally and it will start production again right after you stop.
>Puberty blockers allow kids to have the space and time to figure shit out instead of having puberty run its course and adding to your dysmorphia.
Are you aware that puberty isn't just the "become girl/boy" switch? It's a transition into physical adulthood, and it affects all organs in your body.
Honestly, reckless hormone use and endocrine disruption will be seen as the lead pipes or the asbestos of the 21 century.
>reckless hormone use and endocrine disruption will be seen as the lead pipes or the asbestos of the 21 century
The human race will have an average IQ of about 80 by the year 2100 so I would be surprised if we even have accurate semi-history books at that point.
>Puberty blockers allow kids to have the space and time to figure shit out instead of having puberty run its course and adding to your dysmorphia.
You're either a troll or a genuine troony. Trannies tend to have low IQ's so it's probably the latter. Are you aware at all that puberty blockers lead to a whole host of side effects, including shriveled micro-genitals and an inability to Orgasm? That's right, you're advocating for a treatment that will leave children sexually crippled when they reach adulthood.
Wasn't there something in 1984 about eliminating the orgasm? You, like all queers, live in a fantasy world invented by the media and your online peer groups. Everything about your identity is gaslighting and lies. You obviously do NOT care about the children who will be ruined by puberty blockers. You're just a cultist, spreading your sickness like a virus.
They are a cult of personality here to destroy lives, regardless of if it’s their own their families or complete strangers. ALL trannies believe that big pharma is more important that real human connection, some maybe better than others, some may understand their sick and don’t want to inflict it on children, but all bow to the corporate interest supporting their delusions
I still think theres points in this that arent entrely on the mark with regards to how things are handled these days, but you're not exactly wrong either regarding the internet points thing, its rare but i know it happens.
I hate how this shit is somehow political, because this kind of stuff should just be deferred to medical professionals. Ideally it should just be something that happens, like having asthma or cataracts and getting treated for it, nobody gives a shit.
I just think that you vastly over estimate the amount of people suffering from gender dysphoria, I agree that it’s become to politicized but even if I didn’t I wouldn’t EVER support puberty blockers because we are CENTURIES away from the sort of surgery that most people seem to think the glorified plastic surgery gender transitioning is. If an adult wants to do it, find, but children are to vulnerable to allow them to block a biological process that’s been happening for eons
We’ve used puberty blockers for decades to treat children, but suddenly it’s an existential threat because trans kids also use them.
>I dont understand, xanax has been used to treat people with depression, why cant I pop one whenever I'm feeling a little down?
You need a doctor to prescribe you xanax, moron. Same way you need doctor to diagnose you if you’re trans and wish to get treatment for it.
>You need a doctor
Good to know the opioid epidemic never happened then.
So I guess you refuse to listen to doctors in anything? Or does,it only apply to issues that are politicized and you blindly follow your team’s talking points like a good boy?
Your argument was that, like Xanax, transition drugs will be gateketp by doctors.
I responded that doctors did a piss poor work with opiods, so your example actually argues against the point you're trying to make.
So do you refuse to listen doctors in medical matters, or are you just engaged in superfluous whataboutism.
>engaged in superfluous whataboutism.
Your words mate, not mine.
But yes, the general incompetence and scandals have shaken my faith in certain aspects of modern medicine, particular anything greatly involved with big pharma
What aspects?
Not him but I know at least three people with a history of chronic health issues that have even worse debilitating health issues now because their moron doctors kept prescribing them higher and higher doses of Fentanyl like it was candy. One is in the 50s and now has dentures because Fentanyl caused most of their teeth to rot out of their mouth. You shouldn't dismiss doctors completely but it's clear that a lot of prescription medication is complete bullshit meant to get you hooked and cause you more problems that require other medication to fix and so on.
We used that medicated to chemically castrate sex offenders anon, not stop child development on a mass scale
no they weren't. puberty blockers were used for corner cases where children experienced puberty abnormally early, not for sex offenders.
It’s the same medication anon, and what you’re describing are genuine visible medical problems being medicated, not guidance counselor recommended castration on the basis that a boy likes pink
>I just think that you vastly over estimate the amount of people suffering from gender dysphoria
I think what you're seeing as an overstimation is more the real numbers, but the attention towards that minority is hyperinflated and gives the sense of more than there is in reality, not from statement but implication of exposure. Its a miniscule amount of the population regardless, but remember also that America is frickhuge so theres still quite a lot.
>I agree that it’s become to politicized
Its nice to talk to a sane person for once on this hellhole.
>but even if I didn’t I wouldn’t EVER support puberty blockers because we are CENTURIES away from the sort of surgery that most people seem to think the glorified plastic surgery gender transitioning is.
It depends. Puberty blockers are a weird one, it feels like something that at bare minimum should only be considered at like age 16, because its a sensitive biological process. Surgeries actually seem to be getting to a pretty effective state as of late, you'd be kind of surprised, at least i've seen success stories, but it depends on context and individual mainly it seems. A, say, thin-waisted wider-shouldered to start FTM, with a bit of time, can absolutely do it in an unbelievably effective way, but a tall, broad shouldered MTF would have a much more difficult time, surgeries included. Case and context. Again, outside of my paygrade.
>If an adult wants to do it, find, but children are to vulnerable to allow them to block a biological process that’s been happening for eons
I can understand that position.
I think that we need to first allow trannies to take anti-psychotic medication first and if they don’t like the side effects of that THEN they can start the transition process. I don’t think that challenging the notion of their dysphoria should be seen as “oppressive” but as simply a legitimate reaction that they’re GOING TO SEE as a result of their decision. You need to be able to push back to see if the person is strong enough to undertake the life ahead of them and to guarantee thar they’re genuinely resolute in the decision they’re making for their own health and they’re not just making this decision based on assuming that all of their problems will be dealt with magically by it
The way you're describing it is very abrasive but, in a bit more of a delicate hands-on approach form, i can see exactly what you're getting at with that. Its not a light decision to make, for sure.
troony cope
You are delusional and I'm not just referring to your gender dysphoria. Emptying out the asylums was a mistake.
Delusional how?
>I'm not just referring to your gender dysphoria
I'm not trans.
That is barbaric !
They should be burned at the stake with their biological sex pronouns cut into their flesh.!
After a fair trial of course.
That’s honestly the least of what they deserve
>No. He’s just anti-trans
And an anti-vaxxer. And anti-gay. And anti-sex positivity. And anti-piercings and makeup. And pro-traditional gender roles. And he's constantly shitting on leftist leadership.
But sure, not a conservative. Are you aware of some leftist tax policy of his or something? He's absolutely a right winger. He's just a right winger that's ALSO a female chauvinist. Those aren't mutually exclusive ideologies. Be like saying Islamists aren't right wing because they want conservative MUSLIMS in charge.
>anti-vaxxer, anti-gay, anti-sex positivity, anti-piercings and makeup, pro-traditional gender roles, discontent with leadership
>Karl Marx, Josef Stalin and Misc Pot are now "conservative"
PROTIP: frivolous garbage like "pro-piercings" is not a political stance, it's just you wanting to be an easily-mocked shell of a man (and you will always be a man, not a woman.)
>PROTIP: frivolous garbage like "pro-piercings" is not a political stance
>Dictating how people present themselves publicly isn't a political stance
That's just what people wanting to dictate how people present themselves publicly say. Frick off with your, bullshit. Women aren't going to be forced to dress like pic related.
>Dictating how people present themselves publicly isn't a political stance
You are not oppressed because someone says your piercings and makeup look like shit. You are not a woman in the Middle East. Having an opinion on piercings and makeup is not a political stance.
>Having an opinion on piercings and makeup is not a political stance.
Advocating against makeup and piercings generally as a social position is social conservatism and holy frick if you don't understand that.
Advocating against any form of expression as a means of social control is conservatism. That's literally why the fricking leftist punk movement exists, you fricking dipshit.
You are not oppressed because someone says your piercings and makeup look like shit. You are not a woman in the Middle East. Having an opinion on piercings and makeup is not a political stance.
>leftist punk movement
Punk's earliest roots lie in the British working class, all of whom were white and extremely racist. Your entire stance is based in fanfiction, don't bother replying again.
>You are not oppressed because someone says your piercings and makeup look like shit.
I'm not claiming to be oppressed by you. Dumbfricks like you and Tatsuya aren't in power. And you won't ever be.
>the fricking leftist punk movement exists
Not anymore you dumb shit
Misc Pot was legitimately psychotic and yes I would describe Stalin as right wing. Should have chosen Lenin for your evil commie. Stalin was basically just a monarchist exploiting a heavily centralized state to entrench his own power and push personally beneficial policies to the detriment of everyone around him. He was as left-wing as your average Russian emperor.
I won't even opine on Marx because I know frick all about Marxism, but since left v right is always defined relative the center, and the center tends to move left, having to go back over a century to have a gotcha isn't a good sign for you having a point.
I doubt that Misc Pot even read any Marx.
>I would describe Stalin as right wing
Thank you, that's all I needed to hear. Please continue to express your views so that we, as a people, may agree to one day restrict voting to land-owning white males once again.
>Extreme reactionary defending Tatsuya claims Tatsuya isn't conservative
>Fails to realize he proves himself wrong via his own defense
Name a leftist policy of Stalin. Nationalization of industry isn't leftist when the nation's a totalitarian state run by a single butthole who has absolute authority. That's fricking monarchism.
Stalin was as leftist as Caesar.
>Name a leftist policy of Stalin
Bolshevism
Stalin abandoned Bolshevism for Stalinism and wasn't even considered a Bolshevik contemporaneously, you dumbshit butthole.
Stalinism is Bolshevism except everyone listens to Stalin. You're trying to twist Soviet Russia into a "right wing ideology" on the internet, you have no grasp of political science nor world history, you are a leftist stereotype and will be laughed at accordingly.
>Stalinism is Bolshevism except everyone listens to Stalin
So monarchism. A right wing ideology. Go frick yourself.
you factually dont know what monarchism is
it's not a synonym for dictatorship, lmfao
See
dic·ta·tor·ship
/dikˈtādərˌSHip,ˈdiktādərˌSHip/
Learn to pronounce
noun
government by a dictator.
"forty years of dictatorship"
Similar:
absolute rule
undemocratic rule
despotism
autocracy
tyranny
authoritarianism
totalitarianism
absolutism
Fascism
oppression
suppression
repression
subjugation
domination
Opposite:
democracy
a country governed by a dictator.
plural noun: dictatorships
Similar:
totalitarian state
autocracy
autarchy
>monocracy
dystopia
you read "monocracy" and thought it was spelled "monarchcy" which is why you believe it is a synonym for monarchy
you are the dumbest person ITT by far
Bolshevics went authoritarian as soon as it looked like they might lose an election to the Menshevics.
By that logic, Communist regimes in general were't leftist at all but monarchies despite lacking hereditary succession or indeed a basic feudal structure.
>I do not know what monarchy means but felt qualified to enter a discussion of politics
I lament the American education system.
Then this is your chance to bestow your enlightenment upon my ignorant self, is it not? Go on, let us all hear your definition and a source to back it up.
mon·ar·chy
/ˈmänərkē,ˈmänˌärkē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a form of government with a monarch at the head.
mon·arch
/ˈmänərk,ˈmänˌärk/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Royalty
Insect
noun
1.
a sovereign head of state, especially a king, queen, or emperor.
Google is your friend.
I notice that all such examples include a hereditary line of succession.
>I notice that all such examples include a hereditary line of succession.
The Holy See says hello, you uneducated dumbfrick.
A single exception does not a definition break.
>True gommunism has never been tried!!
That's fascinating. Face the wall please.
Still waiting on that leftist policy from Stalin.
Y'all could have shut me up forever ago had you just posted one. Call him a Communist all you want, doesn't mean he advanced a single leftist ideal.
>Still waiting on that leftist policy from Stalin
see
you will insist that "wasnt real leftism" but it was, your argument collapsed and began shitting itself a few dozen replies back.
>muh ideals
Face it champ, nobody truly champions leftisim, it's just window dressing to win the masses.
>Face it champ, nobody truly champions leftisim, it's just window dressing to win the masses.
Welp, I accept your concession. GG. Bye all.
Then it's true that true leftism hasn't been tried?
Because it is incompatible with human-led government
intensification of class conflict
>Still waiting on that leftist policy from Stalin.
He gave more power to the state.
Textbook leftisim
>collectivization and organization of the Kolkhoz
>various 5 year plans
>seclurization, including the allowing of Muslims to practice their religion freely
>emancipation of women in Eastern Europe and East Germany
>cooperation and support of the Communist Chinese and DPRK
>abolishment of the NEP
>Y'all
Good to know you never had anything of use to say
>Please continue to express your views so that we, as a people, may agree to one day restrict voting to land-owning white males once again.
Rip Cinemaphile and it's entirety of people who think that working for your money is for da Joos™.
Stalin and hitler where left wing, commies and socialist are left wing
Damn, you are stupid.
>Hitler
>Left Wing
Shiggy diggy.
the nazi party or the National Socialist German Workers' Party
yes hitler hated commies but he was as much as a commie as stalin
>gun control
>government owned the means of production
>controlling the populations movement
>anti religion
>mass genocide
Anon, none of that is left wing, or at the very least inherently left wing. its like arguing China is a democracy because it has "Republic" in the name and then pointing out it has private companies stationed there.
Chinese government owns, has a stake in or controls most "private" Chinese companies
You're missing my fricking point.
>I would describe Stalin as right wing
Stalin was absolutely a leftist, just a selfish authoritarian one who didn't think he needed to take an active role in spreading worldwide Communism.
>Stalin was absolutely a leftist, just a selfish authoritarian
Stopped reading there. Define fricking leftism in a way where that description matches that label.
See above
Why are you under the impression that leftism is in incompatible with either of those other aspects?
>I would describe Stalin as right wing.
>I know frick all about Marxism
That much is apparent.
Sounds based to me then.
He's anti-gun control
He's anti-communist
He's anti-groomer
Tatsuya's modern art is genuinely gay as frick, in a way that I can't actually express properly through text.
He's redpilled on the depopulation agenda
He's anti-masonic
He's redpilled on 9/11, Covid and Epstein
He's against reckless government spending
He's against antifa
He knows the election was stolen from Trump and is against the vaccine
He's anti-big pharma and anti-war, which have become right wing positions
>Anti war.
>Right wing.
You've lost the plot, dude.
remember when the far-left advocated going to ukraine for a month
I remember when the DEMOCRATS did that.
If you're going to call anti war right wing then you're just being a slave to false diametric thought.
He's redpilled on David Icke's theories
yes anon he's based you can stop now.
He's pro-prepper/survivalist, pro-Bible, anti-globalist, pro-gun
There's easier ways to say paranoid delusional, Anon.
He's Christian
He's anti-gay
>anti-gay
NO HE FRICKING ISN’T
>NO HE FRICKING ISN’T
Literally assigns the rainbow flag to his enemies and that page is itself shitting on gays as zogbies.
He cannot be “anti-gay” while also jerking the frick out of Monique’s lesbianism, unless I’m somehow too sane for this shit
When was the last time he did that? He's converted.
He's against whites. I'm sorry, who's doing the looting? Yeah, I turn on footage of a riot and all I see are white people looting. Ha ha Tats isn't stupid enough to depict blacks in their natural state, he'd get thrown under the bus by the last of his fanbase immediately.
It's almost like Tat saying 'my message is peace and love. The only reason people hate my work is that they've been brainwashed by materialism and the illuminati.
Just narcissism, you know, its never my fault. Just blame something else.
Both groups have reasons to be anti troony they are not “confused”
>if you don't keep up with the LGBTQ treadmill, then you become a conservative
I bet you think Tat is some reject from the 1950's.
I wouldn't call him conservative the same way I wouldn't call a meth addled train hobo a tour guide. He stumbles drunkenly from one extreme stance to another depending on his mood and the news. And not like in a "I got informed and changed my opinion" kinda way, more of a "pornhub is down, so 5G causes dick covid or whatever" way.
Conservative just because he don't kiss trannie cunnie...life suck in this age
I knew things were going to get bad when he started kissing Obamas’ ass,
Depressed.
This isn't an edit of some sort?
Poor self image.
Just a matter of Time…I thought it was just a phase.
I mean this one's kinda funny on top of being sad and pathetic
He was just misguided
No. He was fun. He didn’t lift up racism and sexism, he lampooned it. It was edgy and it was done well.
It never aimed to hurt anybody because it never had a message besides “let’s laugh at the worst and most manipulative sides of all of us.”
We laughed at bawds, demons, racism, the security state. We laughed at Jesus, Buddha, obnoxious pets. We laughed at succubi, fundies and flamboyant gay guys.
The directionless absurdity of Sinfest defanged all of its Ill will.
Then it got political.
Then it got preachy.
Then it got feminist.
Then it got angry.
Then it got just fricking mean.
The original comic was pure in terms of how it seeks to mock those who make the world a worse place and instead try to be better people for our own sake.
Somewhere along the line, the author himself has forgotten the comic's OWN purity.
could i get filled in? never heard abt this before but who doesnt enjoy witnessing someone's descent to madness
Here was a webcomic artist who made a carefree webcomic about all types of indecency.
It was funny, charming and fairly consistent.
Then the artist introduced a childish feminist pedaling a tricycle.
Sure this is just an attack on the indecency of regressive liberalism, right?
A stupid, self righteous, unbearable little shit on a tricycle spouting the patriarchy hoax?
Surely the artist was mocking the absurdity of authoritarian feminism?
NO.
The tricycle feminist became the moral mouthpiece of the entire series.
To no surprise this had the worst effect on the female characters. Monique especially became haunted by visions where she becomes less and less the life loving never-do-well and more and more a kind of stereotypical man hater.
This comic really illustrates the pathology here.
Monique’s good side is depicted as a defender of helpless damned souls. Her demonic side impresses upon her the terror that she will be exploited or worse if she does not deliberately hurt people. Demon Monique laughs because she not only understands that she has to hurt these people, she has learned to enjoy it.
This is feminism? This is how women want to be portrayed?
This artist convinced me of the function of horseshoe theory. I look at a comic like this and absent of all context I could not tell you if the author was a radical feminist or a a bitter incel MGTOW.
Lots of his later work is like this.
He also goes out of his way to literally demonize sex as much as he can…using hot succubi in skintight clothes of course.
Then…he went full TERF.
The artist has done several comics attacking trans people.
I have met a grand total of one trans person in my life. He asked me to refer to him as a male. I did because…that’s what I thought he was at first to be honest…to me it was a little thing to use those pronouns. To him it meant a level of human respect.
The artist depiction of the trans is like a minstrel show.
thanks for the rundown, but if i'll be real looking at this comic with no context, even with the one included, i would have no idea whats going on
can i get link to the compile? it'd be interesting to see when ideals start to bleed
Where they start to bleed? When The artist started getting political as in like Uncle Sam and Barrack Obama becoming side characters.
But the point of no return was October 3rd 2011.
Pic related.
Monique: you rip on my clothes? You’re the one objectifying me you little fricking turd. Eat a dick.
*Monique kicks the kids’ tricycle over and walks away. We are spared 11 years of Tats’ beating of the radfem dead horse.
Weren't there political themes in the comic right from the beginning, though? You just didn't mind until the comic started showcasing opinions that you don't like.
If it were just that, it'd be one thing. But this anon is right.
It lost its appeal and soul. Your opinion is a sbrain dead as Moviebob who simps for the Zombie Simpsons seasons.
>Weren't there political themes in the comic right from the beginning, though?
Yeah, but only because the comic was created to rip off Bloom County.
You will never make a strawwoman.
>1992
Whoah, is the series really that old?
Y'know for all the flak you lot are giving it right now, I admire the fact the dude has stuck with the series through thick and thin (and for so damn long). I should pick it back up from where I last left off; his politics and reasoning for them are woeful, but there is something about the comics I still enjoy. I do get annoyed by the perpetual standstill of Slick, though maybe that's changed?.
Wasn't aware there was a pre-Internet incarnation of Sinfest. Is there more?
No I actually just think Tat should not get involved in any kind of politics. Those early strips are fricking cringe too.
I wasn't aware of these early preachy comics with an anti feminist bent.
It's horrible in the same way, preachy mean and empty, but it actually takes the opposite opinion.
I thought the feminismization of sinfest was a collapse. Turns out it was a return to form!
There is so much more and it gets so much worse.
The world of Sinfest is depicted as existing in a matrix style false reality called the patriarchy. That being an authoritarian feminist hoax that men control society in an unconscious manner that is paradoxically also deliberate to oppress helpless women.
Patriarchy is not just bullshit it is insulting to women. Infantilizing. It is meant to depict women as helpless, impotent and brainwashed. But for the artist it’s real.
My personal opinion is that the artist stop representing himself with slick and started just wanting to be Monique. Monique becomes far more boyish gets a girlfriend, starts having a fun life without her old male friends on the picture. She’s surrounded by women and accepted by women because she is a woman.
That’s the only way for a radical demise to really accept you,
The artist isn’t trans. Hates trans people. Desperately wants women to appreciate him but can’t figure out how to do it because he’s a man and he’s convinced himself that women hate men.
I feel real bad for this guy but he has to help himself.
Women don’t hate men, Tat. Women probably don’t hate you either…except for the ones you listen to.
Tats is your typical Asian male. He craves females, but he's always going to be at a huge disadvantage in the US because Asian males are waaaaaay down on the dating ladder. Maybe it's the micropenises.
Has he ever done any material about Asian race stuff? Like he seems to have opinions about absolutely everything except that. I wonder what he thinks about Josh Luna or that Single Asian Female guy.
>I have met a grand total of one trans person in my life.
Only one? You're self-admittedly ignorant about trans people? And it was a FtM rather than a MtF? Anyone who knows more than one MtF and/or has to deal with them for long enough will eventually realize what terfs are talking about.
I live in a super left wing blue city, and all of my friends are pretty radical leftists. I also have met exactly one transgender person. If you think they're all over the place, you've been on the internet too much.
I never noticed that Disney character, Naminé, is a Laine ripoff
>TV, not computers
>Sexy
>Not a huge unwashed nerd who want others to forget she exist
I am triggered.
When are we going to get back to the CriminyFuschia storyline?
Crim is no longer any good for the narrative. A sheepish unthreatening bookworm with a polite demeanor and respectful behavior clashes with the comic which more than once has written KILL ALL MEN in capitalized block letters.
I remember at one point there was a thread where someone linked a mega with all the CriminyFuschia strips
That was a comfy thread and strip generally stood up well on their own
OP is underselling the fall of Sinfest. It's not just the politics that changed, its the whole outlook on life.
During early Sinfest Tats wasn't afraid to give his 'bad' characters dimensions. Slick was written to be at odds with the morals of the readers. Slick was a sexist jerk but he was still likeable. Tats took time to show the insecurity and confused values that compelled this Calvin-looking motherfricker to try and sell his soul to the devil to be a pornstar.
Nowadays, Tats is too politically radicalized for that shit. His political enemies are dismissed as mindless zombies. They show up, menace the 'good' characters, then disappear. No sympathy, no attempt at understanding, just raw disgust and hatred.
You nail it man. The politics are just preachy and cringe. The reason Sinfest change hurts so much is knowing that deep down this man has really changed and it’s so unhealthy that it is worrisome.
Another aspect that needs to be examined is how his art has gotten lazier. The example you gave shows Tats still trying with perspective and shit, but nowadays it's gotten kinda shit. Poses are stiff as frick, with characters "running" like they're Macy's Thanksgiving balloons, no lineweight to ANYTHING (check out
and compare it to modern Sinfest) and don't get me started on how dreary the color palette is now. It's like if Pebbleyeet was directed by Zack Snyder!
They were shown living in domestic bliss around the end of 2021; that was part of a hilarious trainwreck where Slick and Squig recruited Crim to become part of their militia to take masculinity back. This involved them witnessing dEgEnErAcY like some dude being dommed by a black woman, which led to pic related. They then picked up Uncle Sam (who'd been turned into a little boy so that The Devil could corrupt him into the EEEEEEEEEEEEVILS of socialism) so they could get 2021-chan out of prison (she'd been indefinitely imprisoned for attacking police who were trying to keep people back from a traffic accident).
This kind of worked, until the prison warden suddenly went "Oh right, we're the bad guys" and put the prison in lockdown (which, of course, showed that Tats didn't know how prisons actually worked, because research is for the WOKE) so everyone was breaking out, including Trike b***h (who'd been thumbing her nose at The Devil for about a decade, but somehow got imprisoned for saying "mEn CaN't BeCoMe WoMeN!" on some online comments section). This led to Uncle Sam turning into an adult zombie, distracting the guards so Slick et al. could escape, then burning down Facebook and Twitter. This led to Liberty wandering INTO prison, so she could comfort Sam as he lay dying (DO YOU GET IT) for waaaay too long. Jan 16 2022, to be precise.
Meanwhile, 2021-chan was also dying in the most mawkish and overblown way possible. In fact, it was so overblown that she didn't die until Jan 9. In fact, we didn't see 2022-chan until February 6, where she was baptised into the Church of Handmaidens ("handmaidens" is a TERF dogwhistle for any cis woman who isn't a hateful prick, even though Margaret Atwood is mostly okay with trans people - it's also Tats' visual signifier for "prostitute", so him showing CHILDREN as handmaidens sure is an interesting choice).
She didn't show up again until... I want to say late March, where she was all aged up and drawn sexy, so that #1 Feminist Ally could draw cheesecake. In fact, Tats has been bouncing around plotlines in the most half-assed way possible this year; there was meant to be some American Idol parody where they'd choose a new Uncle Sam, but he's only done two strips on that, and they were months apart. 2022-chan has time powers, but she doesn't realise it... there are others, but they're all fricking boring.
You may be wondering, "Wait, what did Criminy actually DO during all that?" Well, Crim asked Squigley is he'd really kicked his porn habit turns out he hadn't and... yeah, that was it. I think Tats wanted to show that Slick's militia totally wasn't just misogynistic douches b***hing about DA WOKE, so he added Criminy as a sop to the fans.
Thank you for adding less than nothing, you smarmy c**t!
What the frick is going on in this comic?
I don’t hate or hold contempt for him specifically because if he did not exist this comic would not be made. I hold the same idealization for everything good and evil in the world. Your righteous fury is ineffective and would be better suited towards a real goal, instead of mounting a rally cry on Cinemaphile.
Eat me.
Tat is a great ex pile of what can happen to you when you lose yourself in an echo chamber and toxic emotions.
Why are you talking about this?
Why are you on this message board?
Why are you wasting time.
Fukkin eat me.
Sounds like you’re asking the right questions, good luck!
3/10
Sounds like you're suffering from clinical depression.
I firmly believe that there are actually very few cartoonists out there and they're all like L from Death Note being the first second and third most prominent artist all in one.
>The problem with Tatsuya isn't that he's been brainwashed in a fruity little cult and believes every moronic conspiracy that gets thrown his way
>His problem is supporting women!
Is this post just Tats not knowing what's wrong with him?
What I find funny about modern Sinfest is that he wants to draw sexy women so damn badly but feels the compulsive need to portray it through some ideology instead of just being honest about it
The guy is torturing himself.
I think the sad part is that there's basically no real "Sinfest" anymore. Where as old Sinfest revolved around a core cast of characters getting into shenanigans with a few cutaway gags now and then, modern Sinfest is basically just interchangeable bodies repeating the same things while the comic itself is basically Family Guy-tier of constant cutaways (and even more reliance on pop culture references).
>Interracial couple on TV
Tats wants white pussy so bad it keeps him up at night.
ywnbaw
This is literally the 'it was always political' argument morons like to use about capeshit except this time it was always political he just started having different opinions to you.
Conservatives, Marxists, and TERFs are united in wanting to pretend like we are eternally in the 1960s. Like the 21st century never happened.
There's a reason why Cinemaphile is the most widely-mocked board on the site.
>authoritarianism is exclusively a Right wing trait.
Imagine being this stupid
Totalitarian monarchism is exclusively a right wing trait.
>According to emeritus professor of economics Barry Clark, left-wing supporters "claim that human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated."
Selfishness is inherently right-wing.
>soviets
>bolsheviks
>monarchists
Show me a picture of people Stalin shared power with and then show me that same picture 20 years later.
>So Left wing GOOD, Right wing BAD.
Yes, but that's a function of the beliefs they espouse.
There's literally not a single argument for bolshevism/stalinism/etc. being equivalent to the monarchy they disposed of, now you're begging some other question because you know the initial inquiry of "how the frick was Stalin a monarchist?" is moronic and exposes you.
>There's literally not a single argument for bolshevism/stalinism/etc. being equivalent to the monarchy they disposed of
Jesus actual tittyfricking Christ, enough with the not knowing what words mean. Monocracy is a form of monarchy. Holy frick.
>Monocracy is a form of monarchy
no, it isnt
https://wikidiff.com/monocracy/monarchy
this is some basic shit, you are a terrible debater
So Left wing GOOD, Right wing BAD.
Stalin was BAD, so he wasn't Left wing.
Very tautological
Counterpoint: Hypocrisy and personal delusion are both all too universal traits. If you support leftist policies but embrace an authoritarian mentality, that doesn't convert you into a right-winger.
>If you support leftist policies but embrace an authoritarian mentality, that doesn't convert you into a right-winger.
Correct. Actions speak louder than words and nobody can read minds. And what leftist policies did Stalin support?
Stalin spoke a lot of bullshit, but all he did is centralize power under an autocrat. He stratified society. He pushed right wing policy.
>He pushed right wing policy
name 3
>name 3
Internal passports. Culling of underclasses. And centralization of power in the hands of the monarch.
None of those are inherently right wing and you still fail to understand what monarchy is.
>None of those are inherently right wing
They are though?
>you still fail to understand what monarchy is.
Stalin believed that Marx was correct that Capitalism would self-destruct and be replaced by Communism worldwide. That's part of the reason he felt there wasn't a huge need to push it on the global stage or require a perpetual revolution. Stalin implemented Marxist economic policies with vigor. The issue is that ideas like socialism and Communism don't have perfectly fixed definitions because both have been in constant evolution since their inception. Stalin's version was one of the most self-serving and hypocritical, a mutated branch of Lenin's own hypocritically authoritarian methodology.
I really wonder if anyone in this thread could say in full honestly that their life has improved by being glued to Cinemaphile all day and that they totally haven't torpedoed their lives where their peers from many years back have succeeded.
The truth is bitter, but it is the truth
>The truth is bitter, but it is the truth
I dunno man, being a NEET sounds like it fricking sucks when you put all the pieces together
I've been here since 2005 and wouldn't say it has improved my life per se. But hasn't really detracted from it either.
I mostly stick around because I don't like being in a bubble and this place has a pretty diverse, if irreverent, spectrum of opinions.
A lot of it's horseshit and trolling, but there's enough threads with engaging discussions to keep me around. It's a nice contrast to other social media I'm on like reddit.
I'm probably an outlier as far as Cinemaphileners go though because I'm married with kids and have a nice job. Feels good man.
>but that wasn't REAL communism
Like clockwork
>but that wasn't REAL communism
Communism is a label. Anyone can use any label they want. Labels are meaningless. I asked for a leftist policy. And I'm still waiting.
Communism always resolves into authoritarianism, so communism is a Right wing ideology in the end.
The pins on the wall in the background are placed in an order reminiscent or Worley noise
Trans people have a mental illness called Gender Dysphoria that was taken off the CDC mental illness in 2016 for political reasons. However, it continues to be a mental illness and should be treated as such. Much the same way you do not encourage a schizophrenic person that their hallucinations are real.
Talking about communism in 2022 for or against is such a larpfest. Fricking move on. Our current social and economic customs are totally incompatible with this archaic discourse.
A long time ago my old man told me to never debate politics with anyone that couldn't describe their own economic policy or even basic economic theory, and that advice holds up even better with each passing year.
At some point I've given up on disscousing politics. I've lost a nice female friend over it.
>far-left cretin who doesnt read is a homestuck gay
Things make sense. You have been a malignant tumor on this board for over a decade.
Weird I was called a Nazi on other board. Also What does homestuck have to do with my political aligment
I know that feel. I stopped caring a long time ago. It just doesn't seem worth it anymore, but sometimes I take someone's bait and feel like an idiot immediately after.
Sometime the best thing to do Is to just watch and observe
He started to regret his coomer life-style and repented with becoming feminist. Then he got greeted by American idiocracy and is now hopelessly trying to get it across that americans are moronic.
But that has never worked, America is in cold civil war and requires that people start killing eachother until they gain sense. No one in American idiotic circus has ever changed their view or understood the views of others. They need to start killing each other to progress, but since they still believe that their view is the new majority view, everyone tries to wait out the dinosaurs to die on natural causes.
American political discussion is just senseless waste.
They need to bring back duels. Any time these drones starts attempting to "discuss" politics, give them guns and start counting.
>since the big breakup all those years ago
Reminder that this has always been speculation with no definite proof. It’s a completely fair theory, of course, but we’re just not sure. The triggering event that pushed him off the rails could have just as easily been something else, like, I dunno, his mom getting cancer or something. Or maybe there wasn’t any one big thing that happened to him one day, and he just decided to have his big identity altering epiphany just because. All we do know is that we don’t know anything for certain.
i'm at least glad we all agree that welfare shouldn't be a thing
This whole Thread
I'm actually really glad I've become more on an athiest because I can go through life realizing that none of this shit actually matters
replace trannies with israelites in every sentence and realize that it works the exact same
Why do you insist making noise? Have you ever managed to accomplish anything by discussing with your enemy?. Pick up a rock and bash their head in. He is not going to vote for your guy or commend your saintly opinions. Pick up a branch and drive it through their eye. Shut up, kill the other that doesn't agree with you. They're not dying out. They're not some small minority that is going to go away. Stop making noise, you're not engaging anyone in a discussion. None of these back and forth shitposting reaches anyone. No one is willing to be wrong.
I'm waiting for another Black person to get knelt on and another Summer of Fun to kick off. After watching that shit go down you can bet people will be going out and murdering leftists.
>watching people slowly come to the same conclusions nazis did a second time
you will never be a real woman btw
You can tell that discussion about Sinfest genuinely became worse when he stopped being a simultaneous right-wing man-hater because that alone caused the less than one-dimensional morons to glance over him for being too politically nuanced.
all problems are solved if you would kill every single marxist, from their antifa pawns right up to the WEF
yes, am I advocating violence in real life, and yes, I hate the antichrist, and no, I will not drink the corn syrup
And you people wonder why you get called psychos.
You don't even know what a woman is, people have long since stopped giving a shit about what labels you attempt to give them.
I remember the kid who read books and the demon girl still being normal after he went off the deep end. They got together right as the tricycle girl started showing up. Are they still normal, or has he ruined them, too?
What?
Did I stutter?
Trans people have a mental illness called Gender Dysphoria that was taken off the CDC mental illness in 2016 for political reasons. However, it continues to be a mental illness and should be treated as such. Much the same way you do not encourage a schizophrenic person that their hallucinations are real.
The best part of sintoss threads is that it emboldens all the local morons and schizos into arguing over their generic moron takes so you can easily just report and hide the threads. 🙂
i'm sure those people who have to activate airplane mode for 3 seconds are seething, rule-kun
I know they seethe when jannies delete their 12th shilltoss thread of the day 😉