Oh I swear to god if I had my GWIMBLY GUN RIGHT NOW I'D-
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Oh I swear to god if I had my GWIMBLY GUN RIGHT NOW I'D-
Oh I swear to god if I had my GWIMBLY GUN RIGHT NOW I'D-
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
I think this episode confirms Charlie will be in Multiversus
Watch this be a covert nod.
Exactly my point. It's too specific. Also who else wants Zach to voice an announcer pack with Charlie?
>"I'm gonna be honest with all of you, I wasn't paying attention at all. Congrats, I guess..."
>So it says here you shouldn’t fall off the stage so, uh, stop doing that I guess
it's just a reference to banjo kazooie's big return being a smash bros appearance
Who is this iconic little charactrer?
That's Mini Hand, Master Hand's lil brother.
that's Handlad, master hand's sidekick
You’re lying. There’s no such thing as Handlad.
does that mean there's a Shakelad?
Glover with nude mod enabled
he finally made it, bros
the little fella from the game allan and glep were playing in the enchanted forest episode
>the height of oneyng's 3d modelling capabilities
Charlie and pim but ice climbers
Can we take a minute to appreciate the rendering?
Halfway through the episode I realized that it was hoopolee. Seeing this, and the Mip animation being done by Harry Partridge, what sort of guest animators do you guys want on the show?
Chris O’niel feels like an obvious choice. Hot diggity demon would be my personal choice.
krinkels
>Smiling Friends: Apotheosis
Studio Bones or any actual anime studio
given the smiling friends team adherance to authenticity an anime character that isnt just a western imitation of the style would be refreshing
+1 for krinkels
david firth
weebl
james lee please
I thought this looked like a microsoft 3d movie maker character was that the intention
Nah the way the polygons deform when he's standing still and stuff like his dance are a reference to Crash Bandicoot. Some of his stuff is a reference to Banjo/other Rare games like the music you hear in the game footage. He's like 85% Crash overall though.
Zoom Zoom
>zoom zoom
>1993
popular streamers use it you morons
by that logic the fricking ps1 is "zoomer" too because people still talk about ps1 games
What fricking "zoomer" would be familiar with 3D Movie Maker?? That program came out 29 years ago. That word really doesn't mean anything, does it?
I imagine any resurgence of 3DMM would be due to the Rat Movie.
He's a forgotten 3d platformer from the ps1, he's like Gex
It's PS1 era 3D. Guy who animated him is Hoolopee and makes really impressive animations emulating said style.
He was 100% a Rare/Banjo-Kazooie reference, he's rendered with the same blur of an N64 character, as opposed to the more jaggy nature of PS1 renderings
Gwinbly quite literally has no Z buffer, a trademark of PS1 graphics, you don't know shit
>ps1 texture wobble
>N64
(you)
He’s Croc, Crash, Spyro, Wild Woody, and Banjo all combined.
The game shown in the episode had the music of a Rare game, the boss design of a Spyro game, and the health bar of a Crash game.
I just love how Zach's audio clips for that delivery
>zoomer calling anyone else a mutt or a Black person worshipper
>Adult Swim games getting shut down any day now
>if this episode had come out a few years earlier we could've ended up with an actual Gwimbly game
4 years too fricking late, FOUR YEARS
>Adult Swim games getting shut down any day now
>Creators begging them to make it so the games could keep being playable
>Only would take few button presses
>One guy even sent them a guide on how to do it but they said "It woulnt be fair to do it only for one game"
Jesus fricking christ
Is he a mouse or some indescribable critter? Was that a tail or a prolapsed anus?
He says buzz off in the beginning so I assumed he was an insect like a mosquito maybe.
I was wondering this as well but I don’t think he’s credited as such, I remember he did a convincing ps1 style model of jarjar in a jontron video years ago.
I feel it was designed to be excused as a tail or incest abdomen but it is definitely a prolapsed anus. I admire Zach Hadel's restraint by not having rats or birds picking at it or anyone attempting to cut the prolapse off with gardening shears.
a Wackywhatchamacallit.
why did david zaslav allow this episode? It's very anti corporate and warner bros owns turner which owns adult swim
>thread devolves into drug talk
Jesus, this board.
>It's very anti corporate
Oh no, better tell that to John Oliver before he gets cancelled.
His uncanny animation reminded me of Rayman 2.
If you've seen/played the first Neverhood game, you'd know.
Sometimes I wonder if being a knockoff Goku has something to do with it?
Whats in the first neverhood game that showcases dougs lunacy?
Why hasnt zaslav been ousted yet?
Honest question, did Chris do the modeling and animating for the 3D character? I know he does a lot of work with really old 3D models.
It was Hoolopee, he did all the PS1 graphics for Harry Partridge's Ghostbleed cartoon.
Lost 2 friends to fentanyl. Can't even do cocaine without testing it these days.
Reminds me of that one clip of a guy in the hospital's fight or flight kicking in the minute the nurse offers him Fentanyl for pain relief.
Why do they even put that shit into other drugs?
It's extremely addoctive
It's a complex little problem.
Objectively, fentanyl is a great narcotic. They use it in hospitals for a reason: it works. The issue arises with dosing. There's a scientific term, LC50, which means "what dosage kills off half of the test subjects we give it to?", as a way of accounting for some people having higher natural tolerance than others. For fentanyl, the LC50 dose is so small that you could just barely coat the head of a pencil eraser with the powder if you flattened it out as much as you could. Getting a high off of it, of course, takes even less than that. An equivalent number of hits of fentanyl takes a fraction of the space that so many hits of cocaine would take, which means you can transport it far more easily and far more discreetly. As an added bonus, it's cheaper to make.
The problem is that the average drug dealer is not a trained chemist. The further down the distribution chain you get, the more it declines from "guy that did the math on the reactions" to "guy that bought more drugs than he uses, so he can make more money for drugs". You hit a point, often pretty close to the end user, where some idiot has the valid idea of "I can mix in a little fentanyl with my shitty cocaine to get a cheaper, better product that gives me repeat customers" and follows it up with the shitty idea of "I will mix 100 safe doses of fentanyl with 100 safe doses of my shitty cocaine and a big pile of filler, and I'll do all of this in a big mixing bowl with a spoon." One bad mixing job later and you have 190 doses of cut cocaine and 10 death sentences.
Jesus christ drug dealers are just idiots, arent they?
That's what happens when a market that size with that low a barrier to entry is made illegal instead of regulated. It just becomes a black market with zero controls.
Shit, it's not even limited to the hardcore painkillers. Right before Covid hit there was a huge outbreak of lung damage among teens because dealers were putting Vit E Acetate into vape carts as filler to stretch their honey oil.
I agree, normally im not a libertarian or anything but you make a good point that it should just be legalized and regulated instead of just letting crackheads be chemists and killing like 30 people because they put too much fent in cocaine or weed or some shit
Oh god isnt that horse tranquilizer or some shit? Im not a big drug head but ive heard of it before
Tranq's a street name for Xylazine, an IV anesthetic used on animals that has no approved use in people.
It's used to cut fentanyl and repeated use ulcerates the injection sites, which in a destitute fentanyl junkie is likely to wind up necrotizing. The patches of dead and rotting skin earned it its second street name: zombie
> and repeated use ulcerates the injection sites, which in a destitute fentanyl junkie is likely to wind up necrotizing. The patches of dead and rotting skin earned it its second street name: zombie
Holy hell. Also explain to me what cutting a drug means and why would they need to mix fentanyl, an already potent drug, with fricking animal tranquilizer?
>explain to me what cutting a drug means
Cutting is when you mix something into the drug to pretend you have more than you actually do. The most commonly known example would be putting baby powder in the cocaine you're selling.
I have 100 grams of fentanyl that costs X per gram to make
I have 50 grams of xylazine that looks the same as fentanyl, feels similar, but costs less and nobody wants to buy it
Through the magic of cutting, I now have 150 grams of "fentanyl"
Thats fricking nuts holy shit, oenny pinching to the literal end it seems
That doesn't say much. Isn't ketamine also used as a horse tranquilizer?
Channel 5 has some eye opening videos on the tranq epidemic
>That's what happens when a market that size with that low a barrier to entry is made illegal instead of regulated.
Pretty much all opioids are in some way legal and regulated and they are still the most destructive drug out there
>Opioids are street legal!
homie they're schedule 2.
Yet that doesn't seem to stop the rampant abuse now does it?
>They're street legal!
>No they aren't, you're wrong and moronic
>THEY'RE STILL ABUSED
moron.
are street legal!
Literally nobody said this you schizo. Morphine and OxyContin are opioids which are legal and regulated ad still habitually abused.
>I am fricking moronic and not only am I incapable of following a conversation I'm wrong about my pedantry as well
Possession of a schedule 2 substance is a class-5 felony.
Which is what we call regulation, you moron. If a drug is not illegal to prescribe but illegal to possess, yet still gets abused, that shows the failure of the system. The obvious problem is not with punishing possessors, but with the legality of distribution.
>doubling down on (incorrect) pedantry
You are very stupid.
You're being an obtuse butthole, anon. That's clearly not what the other guy meant by "legal"
>That's what happens when a market that size with that low a barrier to entry is made illegal instead of regulated. It just becomes a black market with zero controls.
Anon, regulating it wouldn't fix shit. Like you said, there's practically zero barriers to entry, so any schmuck that felt like it could start making and selling fent if he felt like it. When there's that many potential suppliers it becomes practically impossible for regulations to be consistently applied and enforced. What's more, a lot of the "legitimate" drug-dealers in such an environment would still have strong incentives to break theese regulations when they see fit, and the fact that their main business would be legal makes it easier for them to hide the even shadier shit they do (you see a lot of this type of thing in jurisdictions where prostitution is legal). Making drugs legal wouldn't fix anything, all it would do give a cleaner face to the same deeds and potentially weaken the social stigma surrounding hard drugs. The more sensible solution would be to reduce the size of the market via effective rehabilitation for drug addicts and increase the risks and costs associated with trying to supply it by increasing penalties for drug-dealing (as well as other, more general socioeconomic policies to reduce poverty and criminality).
>being legal and licensed and regularly inspected makes it EASIER to hide bad behavior
That's stupid.
>that might weaken the stigma!
Good, that stigma is what prevents us from actually helping these people.
>The more sensible solution would be to reduce the size of the market via effective rehabilitation
Rehabilitation doesn't meaningfully reduce the size of the market, for that you have to prevent addiction in the first place by removing monetary incentives in the system to give people shit like oxy and then not wean them. People getting fent off the street are people that were prescribed opiates, never weened, and kicked off the drugs when they could no longer pay or get a prescription.
And none of that has anything to do with whether street legalization would cripple the black market (it would) or prevent addicts from falling deeper into a poverty spiral (it would)
There's a lot of shit that can and should be done at multiple angles.
>That's stupid.
As i mentioned before, this type of shit already happens in places where things like prostitution are legalized. It's a lot easier to disguise cases of human trafficking when you use a legal prostitution business as a front. There's been several cases of this type of thing happening in countries like the Netherlands, and doubtless similar practices would arise with the legalization of illicit drugs.
>Good, that stigma is what prevents us from actually helping these people.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure they say. While the social stigma might not make rehabilitation any easier, it does prevent others from getting addicted in the first place. Wide-spread knowledge of the dangers (both personal and legal) associated with drugs would prove, i'd imagine, a powerful incentive to avoid them for those otherwise inclined. Of course, this would not apply to everyone, but the undeterred group could still be helped via the socioeconomic methods i mentioned.
>Rehabilitation doesn't meaningfully reduce the size of the market
Perhaps not the entire market, but doubtlessly segments dependent on repeat sales would be adversely affected. Besides, the policy i proposed seeks to reduce both the supply and demand. Harsher punishments for drug-dealers discourage them from entering the market, while rehabilitation helps those who've now been cut-off from their supply to kick the habit.
>for that you have to prevent addiction in the first place by removing monetary incentives in the system to give people shit like oxy and then not wean them.
I don't oppose this. i'd welcome it even. It's a part of the comprehensive approach that i think would be the most effective solution. However, I think legalizing these drugs would hinder rather than help that approach. If any shithead with even a vague familiarity with chemistry could offer him a jolt of hard-stuff as he's being weaned-off of opiates, it would definitely make matters much more difficult.
>It's a lot easier to disguise cases of human trafficking when you use a legal prostitution business as a front
It's actually much much harder, which is kind of the point. A pimp doesn't need immigration papers.
>The stigma prevents addiction
Clearly not.
>Harsher punishments will solve it!
Every ounce of research and common sense says that increasing penalties does not reduce incidence. Instead it increases associated acts of violence and negligence performed to escape capture. Making the penalty for dealing equivalent to manslaughter and you haven't reduced dealing, but you've given a bunch of dealers reason to commit manslaughter.
You're simply incorrect on every single count, substituting what you wish or imagine were true for reality. I don't doubt that there's no small amount of "just world" thinking and condescension towards the general public involved.
>It's actually much much harder, which is kind of the point. A pimp doesn't need immigration papers.
>"Countries with legalized prostitution are associated with higher human trafficking inflows than countries where prostitution is prohibited. The scale effect of legalizing prostitution, i.e. expansion of the market, outweighs the substitution effect, where legal sex workers are favored over illegal workers. On average, countries with legalized prostitution report a greater incidence of human trafficking inflows."
>t. Cho et al., World Development, 41 (1), 2013, pp. 67-82
a bit old perhaps, but i think it demonstrates my point well enough.
>Every ounce of research and common sense says that increasing penalties does not reduce incidence
Perhaps in isolation, but once again, i do not propose that punishment alone would fix the issue. Efforts to provide alternative means of economic subsistence and advancement, improve education, reduction of many of the root causes of drug abuse such as, say, metal illness, these must all be adopted in order to combat the illicit drug trade. My point is that these drugs, and, most importantly, their sale must remain criminalized in order for these efforts to succeed. There must be no growth, no avenue for entry into this market if the issue is to be solved, and decriminalization of these drugs would ultimately make any attempt to do so pointless and futile.
The idea that legalization grows the market is ancient and idiotic.
All you have demonstrated is an ability to ignore the concept of survivorship bias - of course countries where regulation and legality makes enforcement easier catch and therefore report more trafficking. That's a good thing.
Keeping possession heavily criminalized does nothing to help anyone
Why would the drug dealers stop doing this if it was made legal?
Because if it was legal to take those drugs, people suffering from it would be able to report the dealers to the police without getting themselves arrested. Same reason why sex traffickers and food companies with zero safety standards prefer to use illegal immigrants for their labor.
I never thought it like that, thanks!
Look at what happened repeatedly with weed. As soon as it becomes legal, investors exploit an economy of scale and price out the corner dealers. The guy buying warehouses of product can sell for cheaper than the guy trying to resell at a mark-up, and having the license means they have a reason to keep their product in line with the legal standards. It's not that the guy on corner won't still want to cut his product with fillers and fentanyl to make more money, it's that he'll now have to compete with lower-priced, safer, legal alternatives. His customer base is immediately reduced to people that can't buy it legally (i.e. minors) and it stops being a racket that can fund a life.
There is really no reason for drug dealers to give a shit about repeat customers. If you make a fent zombie and they just die, then you have their money and that's one less person who might potentially rat you out, since they'll either be in a casket or transformed into another waste of oxygen wandering in the bad part of some blue city, completely brain-fried and incapable of doing anything except eating and shitting themselves. And it's not like there will ever be a shortage of stupid kids who take drugs, so repeat customers simply aren't a concern.
Fent is also pretty much the ideal dealer drug because it's highly-addictive with a high mortality rate, and you can lace it into pretty much anything since you need so little of it. And it's not just the hard drugs, the prevalence of fentanyl directly correlates with more places making marijuana something you can just freely ingest. People will just keep taking it though because the average IQ in this country keeps dipping below 90, never mind the drug cartel ethnicity making up a majority of people now.
Post art of sonic and pals getting rouge'd
No, moralists who refuse to legalize are just idiots.
I believe in drug legalisation and regulation solely because drug dealers are fricking jerkoffs
>LC50
OH NO NOT AGAIN AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
sometimes its not even intentional, its them using the same scale for coke as they do fentanyl.
like fricking look at how much the average lethal dose is for fentanyl. if you have a cheap dealer, they'll not notice the like fricking 20 specs of fentanyl that will kill a man and kill a dozen people at once
Reminder to always say NO.
But really, rest in peace anon's friends.
Good get fricked druggie.
Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un
America has a fricking fentanyl
>fentanyl
I don't know what's that?
Super Heroin
Is there a mega for the episode?
Here’s the whole night with bumbers too. Cut to the last fifth for new episode.
https://mega.nz/file/w3F0VBhY#3kfV_BKiEa58YGP62x6bjO7xxYyZElM6-k6m-uSt4mM
I'm surprised Gwimbly wasn't on drugs or an alcoholic. Totally skipped the cleaning up bit, which is kinda refreshing.
Can you just imagine the pitch meeting between Zach and Michael?
>"Okay so he's this yellow mosquito looking guy in a 90s Hawaiian shirt, hat, and he collects cans of cream corn"
they already did that with mr. frog
>I'm surprised Gwimbly wasn't on drugs or an alcoholic.
wasn't he essentially drunk on the streets to start the episode
Maybe but it wasnt a big part of his character either
Another refreshing thing is that Pim gets essentially an unqualified win for once. He was able to help a childhood hero get a job and off the streets, and sure it was partially because of a coincidence but if he hadn't encouraged Gwimbly it wouldn't have happened either.
Naggers
OOH OOH OOH
I kinda want to play the Gwimbly game
He looks pretty cute ngl
>mouse quest II
when will they make III?
I think if it was popular enough to merit a sequel Shrimp likely wouldn't have been quite so isolated
Mouse quest 2 has a GTAV situation, it makes so much money that you won't see MQ3 is like a decade and a half
isn't this show supposed to have an optimist view of people and the future of society? it's much more doomerpilled than it is smiling because the couple of times people do manage to smile it's only because they vent out their mass shooter sociopathic tendencies what the frick? rick and morty wasn't half as blackpilled as this show
Nah plenty of legit smiles, a man finding purpose, a man finding true love, frowns turned into smiles. It’s more about comedy so some end up being sociopaths
it's a silly comedy you fricks
I mean they did legitimately help the guy who needed help this episode. One butthole killed another butthole, but that doesn't mean the world isn't optimistic.
The show isn't optimistic or pessimistic. It's absurdist. Life is chaos so you have to find your own meaning in it, but sometimes things just happen.
>gwimbly finds success in a new game
>bully character realizes his murderous impulses were wrong and regrets them
>ceo of microsoft is murdered
sounds optimistic to me.
Look up Tranq, and report back.
I get that Gwimbly is supposed to be a washed-up aughts mascot platformer star, in the vein of Sonic or Bubsy, but who specifically is he meant to be most like? From the little gameplay sample in the lobby it reminded me of Banjo Kazooie, certainly the mention of a Gwimbly Gun and a sidekick in Mr. Millipede seems to enhance that similarity, but collecting cream corn and the guy's general body plan and twitchy polygons make me think more of Crash Bandicoot.
The character very specifically imitates the vertex errors and lack of texture filtering on the PSX
i think the vertex errors are just mocap jank because his mouth movements are smooth, still looks funny though
I dunno, they seem pretty intentional, especially in the one shot in the game boss's office where Pim is holding his arm and it keeps massively growing and shrinking
just checked and yeah he has the polygon jitter in that scene but not in his introduction, guess they forgot it
I’m going with Crash
Banjo or Spyro would be the closest I'd say. Gwimbly himself being more like Banjo while the stuff around him being more Spyro esque (his companion being a bug and the antagonist having a Gnasty Gnorc look)
>From the little gameplay sample in the lobby it reminded me of Banjo Kazooie
Really? The camera angle screams Spyro 2 boss fight.
I was a tendie growing up, never played any of the Spyros, so my ability to connect things to those games are pretty superficial.
It's closer to a Crash bossfight, specifically Crash 3. Look at the health meter in the corner, it's identical to the ones in the game
Nothing hard specific. Just a parody of 90s Mascot game characters from that era. But clearly it does lean more on Crash for Design, Banjo Kazooie for gameplay and I think a bit of Spyro animation wise.
he was a Jinjo
I would say Croc since Zach was on the Croc playthough on oneyplays, I unironically think there is a direct through line from him being on that series to this episode
>he saw it on croc
Crash and Banjo.
When seen next to those, one can really see the inspiration.
https://twitter.com/MrSnappyeagle/status/1775088597995241576
They couldnt get more obvious
even the CEO was like a combination of Nintendo and Playstation
>Abandoning the cool mascot that made them popular chasing mature games and DLC
>Complete obsession with protecting a dead IP they havnt used in decades
I was thinking more EA or Activision, specially with the sitting on IPs and DLC, Tennapel said that he wanted to do a new The Neverhood game but EA holds the rights and told him to frick off but also wouldn't seel it back to him despute EA not doing anything with it
How long has doug tennapel been some weird extremist christcuck? Has he been this way since the 90s or did he only become some born again relatively recently or something?
Even back in the 90s he was a good christian boy, you can hear it on the earthworm jim special edition when he harps on the theory of evolution at the end, the difference is that twitter and youtube make people more visible, before you could only see him on magazines and stuffs, that and the overall polarization of society
> you can hear it on the earthworm jim special edition when he harps on the theory of evolution at the end
Oh my god, how did some weirdo like him even get into working in comics and such if he thinks everything is sinful to the point he doesnt even believe in evolution?
Back then people could differentiate the art from the artist, unlike now
>dude that posts cropped porn and edits for no reason calling an old man a 'weirdo" for being christian
How were they Nintendo? Those are the only ones who don't abandon their actual mascots and actually still make platformers.
It was obviously meant to be more about Microsoft, specially knowing the Banjo inspiration, the whole "it's my IP to sit on and do nothing with", and even this old cartoon
pretty much every large gaming company has a lot of IPs they dont use, could literally be any of them
>its obviously X!
shows your console fanboy bias
I mean, he’s right. Nintendo uses Mario a shitton still. If it was a Star Fox parody it’d fit Nintendo better.
And yet, Sony doesn’t even own Crash or Spyro, Master Chief is in his death throes and Rare makes nothing but Sea of Thieves DLC, Mega Man has been totally replaced by generic AAA sloppa karateman, Epic has abandoned poor Jazz Jackrabbit, not even a skin in Fartknife… and Sonic suffered perhaps the grimmest fate of them all, hollowed out into a marketable plushie with no good games to his name, yet plastered everywhere for everyone to see his shame.
How does remaining beloved by children end up a worse fate than dead and forgotten by the mainstream, mascots primarily entertain children and if children over generations still relate with those mascots they've done something right. Frick even the sonic movies do well and there's a third one coming out, the people making them even respect the characters and kept them true in terms of visual look and lore.
>How does remaining beloved by children
He's not, though. He's popular primarily with manchildren and aging furries, and exclusively in the west- Japan still hates him.
>Frick even the sonic movies do well
Because SEGA is barely involved with them, everything SEGA touches loses its soul instantly.
Is that really true that like no one in japan likes sonic?
He is severily more popular in America than in Japan that much is true
Why is that anyways?
There's no real singular reason you can give.
Some Japanese games just have a more dedicated following outside of Japan, like Metroid.
Japan has never experienced any of the good Sonic media beyond the Genesis games. Japanese Sonic has always been a bland, personality-free marketable plushie, and SEGA has scrupulously avoided exposing them to any rude dude 'tude from the western side of things lest they miss the chance at being the next Hello Kitty.
Weebs will frame this as a good thing, naturally, and Sonic's failure in Japan as a mere coincidence
So wait they dont want sonic to be rude in japan in the vain attempt to make him like hello kitty? I mean why havent theyve given up on that yet that clearly isnt gonna rival hello kitty
Doesn't jap sonic say shit and frick?
Yep, in like a few episodes. But for the vast majority of the time, unless its the third season (that was asked for by the US side of things) or the adaptations of SA1 and 2, Sonic mostly lays around until Eggman attacks.
You realize Sonic X is from Japan right?
>Sonic X
>good
>but muh 4kids ruined
still not good in jap
>with no good games to his name
I-I liked Mania, Frontiers and some of the earlier games...
> I-I liked Mania, and some of the earlier games...
Non canon to SOJ’s curated “universe”
>Frontiers
Well, no accounting for bad taste
True, but the whole "oh people don't want childish platforms" can't apply to Nintendo since they're like the only big company still making silly childish platformers.
>make him look goofy not "cool"
Yeah, he's absolutely Crash/Banjo.
>Move over, Buck Bumble
I want to see a magazine ad for one of the Gwimbly games.
He's clearly a PS1 era 3d platformer mascot, he's Crasg, Spyro, Gex, all those homies together. All succesful during the ps1 era and then inmediatly failures ever after
The show is great at being quotable. I guess the voice acting just really sticks in your head that way.
Zach has honed his bits over years of OneyPlays recordings and Michael's made a ton of great shows pretty much alone. YOLO is hilarious.
I like this show but it doesn't make me laugh
I like my husband but doesn't make me laugh which is why I let a clown car's worth of funnymen and jesters run a train on me every night.
honestly I kinda like that it isn't going for LOL jokes. Thats what killed my enjoyment of Rick and Morty. By season 3 it felt like they kept trying to make the next joke even more funnier or kept doing funny references to the point it felt forced and lame.
Best joke for me was the weird game company CEO guy dipping a nugget into a pool of his own blood before he died
the way it ramps up to the peaking is gold
We watchan all Smiling Friends eps here movieCinemaphileDOTcom
its really great to see this show hire talented artists from the internet with unique styles.
its really sad to see a lot of the internet's talent go to waste because most of them dont work on big projects
The Cameo bit is EASILY the best part of the episode
Everything about it is beautifully crafted to be as awkward as possible, I loved every second of it.
>filming in some seedy back alley of the inner city
>films from a low-angle shot while looking down, giving you a rather unpleasant angle to look at
>delivers his message in a meandering, stilted way
>doesn't talk in his iconic accent, instead he sounds (and looks) extremely tired
>half-asses his catchphrase with a roll of his eyes
The only thing it was missing was him telling the requestee to "keep Jesus in your heart" during a difficult time, despite looking like God abandoned him years ago
the cameo bit was cringe. it is not funny, just an accurate reference, and the thing it is referring to is already so dead, most people don't know about it, especially outside america. it's like making fun of dog turds, who gives a shit or actually ever used cameo
what internet culture references? the cameo bit is the only one i can think of.
the hall of records
Shit taste the cameo bit was hilarious
zach and michael were in hoolopee's video in february, we shouldve seen this coming
By that logic Max G must've animated something for smiling friends too. If only we knew what it was
I think it's likelier he might voice a character in an episode.
Is there porn of maid charlie yet
Yeah, most of it is sfw stuff
>porn
>sfw
I think you failed the assignment here
I dunno man, personally I wouldn't open this at work, but that's just me
why does reddit friends attract the most degenerate types of fans what the frick?
This entire section felt like it was designed to pander to fujos
just curious, has anybody tried watching this show with someone who might not be familiar at all with internet culture? how did it go?
like the cameo bit made me burst out laughing but i doubt my parents and less terminally online friends would have the same reaction
the humor of smiling friends has a specific audience i feel
I showed the mr frog episode to my sister and one of my normie friends and they thought the absurdity was funny in a weird way. None of them understood any of the internet humor but the pacing made it so even if you didn't understand a joke the show wouldn't linger for too long
thats kinda interesting cause i didnt even think of the fact that cameo wouldnt be a recognizable reference for a lot of people
i think thats fine though, not everything needs to be for everyone
I watched it with my older brother who is unaware of most of those things too and a lot of the jokes fly over him too but he doesn't dislike the show. Funnily enough, the episode he lile the most was the Brazil one because he said it reminded him to Family guy
so how many adult dating sims do you guys think Grimbly starred in?
$5 gets you pretty far
just like actors going to Japan to do weird commercials
so he probably did alot
>Zach and Michael's best cartoon is canon in the SF universe
SF universe?
I unironically would want a Gwimbly game
Also a gleb plushie
*Glep