Yes. even a terrible script can be made to sound good by a decent actor. Failing that, it is their responsibility to say "this is shit, do better or I won't put my name to it."
But the article doesn't say anything about his performance. It critiques the words that are said and the script (stuff that has nothing to do with him)
this pretty much >we know that this dinosaur hunted like this because… because we just know okay!
anthropology is the same way >we know that cavemen could count because… because we just know okay!
Anthropology has no bottom when it comes to moronation >find remnants of indian tribe that was hunted to extinction before the arrival of Columbus
WHITE PEOPLE INVENTED TIME TRAVEL
this pretty much >we know that this dinosaur hunted like this because… because we just know okay!
anthropology is the same way >we know that cavemen could count because… because we just know okay!
i studied palaeontology at uni, you're talking about 'dinosaur enthusiasts' rather than palaeontologists
i no longer do palaeontology as the whole thing has been made insufferable by them
they treat it like a fandom, they have no qualifications, they shout louder on social media so actual palaeontologists dont get their points across
a good example would be when asked what did a Tyrannosaurus look like:
palaeontologist >"there is some debate among academics, we have a number of skin impressions so we can assume that if there were any feathers they would be simple hair like feathers sparsley covering the surface akin to a modern elephant. Now there is some debate over whether they had lips or not and their has been some back and forth over this. We can also tell that they had some cartilaginous structures around the eye.......
dinosaur enthusiast >no body can really say for sure, so i say they looked like big heckin fluffy chickens, with bright blue airsacs....."
I forgot this was a thing. Does this documentary cover the paleozoic? Its a fascinating era, I love the giant amphibians and early synapsids, but most documentaries just do Jurassic or later
>Basic matter of fact monologue
We haven't had one of those in years. All the recent Attenborough shit is atrocious, he spends the entire time whining about how evil humans are for destroying the poor little habitat of the venusian sea squirrel.
>Gootecks out >Twitch tries out different people for PogChamp >Then just decides to use an already existing global emote
It really did feel like a turning point.
He does have teeth, they're just below the gumline. And his teeth are both venomous, and coated in nasty bacteria so that infections will finish the job if the poison doesn't. If he bites you, you're dead.
well yeah we also have guns and tanks so whether or not he has teeth is irrelevant if we're allowed to use tools. I thought you meant a barehanded one-on-one fight to the death dealio
atheists >Nature is so beautiful! No God is needed to create such perfection!
also atheists >Nature is so cruel! Only an evil God would create it this way!
Only an evil god would create something as stupid as you
8 months ago
Anonymous
>ur stoopid for pointing out my logical fallacies! you can't do that! only atheists like me can point out contradictions in someone's way of thinking! atheist smart! you dumb!
lmao
8 months ago
Anonymous
Your bait has no power here friend
8 months ago
Anonymous
maybe your friends over at r/atheism or /misc/ can help you cope, you precious little b***h
8 months ago
Anonymous
This one needs to have sex
8 months ago
Anonymous
bend over
8 months ago
Anonymous
rentfree topkek
how is /misc/ doing it? It seems impossible for cucks to not permanently think about this shill kindergarten, nowadays populated primarly by other cucks like them?
8 months ago
Anonymous
hi /misc/gay, how's the war in Ukraine going? two more weeks, am I right? Israel will be over too, as well! trust me!
I was thinking how it's more hilarious that the backwards knees make it easier to go down.
Regardless, beasts are man's domain so they're ours to ponder. If we don't like it we can genocide the lizards. If we think it's funny, we can breed more of them.
Just so long as goat cheese doesn't go away, I don't care.
They used to have lizards three times that size in Australia.
The Abbos wiped them out with aggressive slash and burn hunting and then forgot how to make fire.
What did he say? Something like climate change aware dinosaurs?
>Nature programmes used to celebrate how enormous and wondrous our world is. Then the climate crisis forced them to adapt, so they became programmes about how wondrous our world was, and still could be, if we could only stop damaging it. Now, wildlife series are evolving again, and Life on Our Planet is part of a new breed that looks at humanity killing itself, and says: hey, nature has been through worse than this before. Here, the story that will happily carry on without us is told to us as an awesome, cinematic epic.
>Those small moments illustrate how mammals, reptiles, arthropods, fish, cephalopods and other “dynasties”, as the programme likes to call them, established themselves via natural selection. “Throughout history, life has been waging an unending war,” says Morgan Freeman’s film-trailer voiceover, slightly nonsensically. “One dynasty rising, only to be vanquished by the next.”
>As well as treating billions of animals in the same broad biological grouping as if they were an army or a sports team enjoying success together
>You can see why Life on Our Planet has gone in that direction: epochal events are hard to capture in images, so it’s trying to make us feel the hugeness of what’s happening with words. But if the series was less concerned with constantly reinforcing how incredible everything is, it could have found room to be more informative. Watch the show with an inquisitive child and you might find them asking questions that the programme doesn’t answer, such as what caused the spikes and falls in oxygen/CO2 levels that led to the mass extinctions of the ancient past
So what? They object to them using terminology which compares survival of the fittest to a war and they b***h that there's not in-depth shit on what caused some mass extinctions even though this seemingly isn't the focus of the documentary?
They had to lower its marks because it did not follow the globalist agenda fully. Freeman was just collateral damage. It's like when their editor sees an article saying that Russian soldiers are humans too and censors it.
Yes, there were a couple I think. Basically, life at the time converted all the available atmosphere to c02 without there being any/enough organisms to convert it back. The greenhouse effect added onto that.
>Americans lose their minds when someone suggests that things on Earth may have used to be a little different thousands of millions of years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event4kyapj
Apparently caused by megavolcanoes erupting in a short period of time
Not really comparable to taking Jurassic biocarbon and steadily putting it back into the biosphere
The worst conceivable outcome of putting Jurassic levels of carbon into the biosphere is that the Earth will go back to the Jurassic period; i.e. a really awesome tropical paradise
We're talking "volcanoes hundreds of miles wide erupting for hundreds of thousands of years" co2 levels, not the "parts per million" they're on about now. I think it was like 20 times the current levels with a massive collapse in photosynthesis and ozone weakening causing huge amounts of radiation to get down to the surface.
from volcanos mostly, they conveniently ignore the sulfur and ash
Permian–Triassic extinction event
The Permian–Triassic (P–T, P–Tr) extinction event (PTME), also known as the Late Permian extinction event,[3] the Latest Permian extinction event,[4] the End-Permian extinction event,[5][6] and colloquially as the Great Dying,[7][8] forms the boundary between the Permian and Triassic geologic periods, and with them the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras respectively, approximately 251.9 million years ago.[9] As the largest of the "Big Five" mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic,[10] it is the Earth's most severe known extinction event,[11][12] with the extinction of 57% of biological families, 83% of genera, 81% of marine species[13][14][15] and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species.[16] It is also the largest known mass extinction of insects.[17] There is evidence for one to three distinct pulses, or phases, of extinction.[16][18]
The precise causes of the Great Dying remain unknown. The scientific consensus is that the main cause of extinction was the flood basalt volcanic eruptions that created the Siberian Traps,[19] which released sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, resulting in euxinia and anoxia,[20] [21] elevating global temperatures,[22][23][24] and acidifying the oceans.[25][26][3] The level of atmospheric carbon dioxide rose from around 400 ppm to 2,500 ppm with approximately 3,900 to 12,000 gigatonnes of carbon being added to the ocean-atmosphere system during this period.[22]
So you're saying human CO2 release is a drop in the ocean compared to natural events like volcanos and even if we went zero carbon forever we'd still have a climate that changes? You antiscience chud! Only humans (specifically my team of humans) can save the planet, and only through massive taxation
I can kinda see why they are mad now, you can't imply that nature would do fine with climate change or how there have been bigger global scale events in the past.
Planet Earth 1 was kino of the highest order and has nothing to do with how crappy the other docs are today. If people want to imitate it and fail that's their problem
>poor
free from the burden of managing money >and starving
not obese >in the cold
in a pleasantly cool >dark
post-light punk >hellscape
sanctuary of the benevolent and misunderstood Satan >they're creating.
that has risen naturally and without prompting or influence, as a result of humanity evolving progressively toward our Utopian ideals.
And that's a good thing!
What I would give to kidnap Morgan Freeman and make his life a living hell. I would force him to dress up in elf and leprechaun outfits and subject him to pure awfulness and humiliation. Just terrible degradation and shameful acts. It would be so easy to break his spirit and drive him to suicide, but I wouldn't let him do it. If I could train a dog to rape on command then I would totally do that as well. A really big dog like a mastiff. He would be so completely and utterly powerless to stop it, not to mention terrified. A big ass dog is even scary and life-threatening to a normal human but to a midget? Might as well be a dragon. I'd keep him in a cell and what's more is that I would actually place the key inside with him but put it in a high place. Not extremely high but just ever so slightly out of reach. It would drive him mad. I would dress him like a baby and force feed him 99 cent store baby food. I'd also pick him up like a child and toss him from one corner to the next. I'd grab him by one leg and swing him as hard and as fast as I could then hurl him to see how far he goes. I'd rent one of those giant inflatable bounce houses and body slam him all day until my arms got tired. I'd hold him down with 1 hand and slowly stick things up his butt just to see him squirm. I would stick him in dryers and turn them on and leave him in there for long periods of time. I'd force him to fight other midgets to the death. Just so many things i would do.
>Renowned for having a great speaking voice and has been doing narration for decades >People just now have a problem with it
This is the new hill journos are going to die on? They all deserve the bullet.
it's funnier because the only reason the reviewers have a problem with this is because the script didn't mention Global Warming and how we need to combat it by eating the bugs, importing the immigrant and donating to the BLM
Autistic rich daddy homosexuals dug up 3 ounces of a hip bone and half of a tooth and told people God's not real because they dug up the bones of giant lizards and now here we are.
Aliens don't matter, real or not. FTL is impossible. We all die in Sol.
We couldn't even go to the nearest star because it's a trinary system, completely uninhabitable due to the completely random and chaotic orbits that could never ever be predicted even if the whole universe was a computer.
I'm just glad to see a series that actually shows pre-mammalian synapsids again. Shame that dinosaurs get all the attention, especially end-Cretaceous ones.
Yeah. As a paleonerd who loves prehistoric life documentaries and really felt the era of scarcity of the late 2010s I welcome any kind of decent documentary as long as it isn't absolute garbage like the Stephen Fry doc.
Reminder that every single fossil that was supposed to prove the link between man and ape either went missing or was accidentally destroyed, or in the case of the "Lucy" fossil, was just the skeleton of an ape
There is only one narrator I want to hear... As Im strapped to a meteor thats headed towards prehistoric Earth. The key to the Armageddon style nuke is locked in a safe and the only one who knows the passcode to the safe is my crush. In order to get the code, all i have to do is call her on the phone and actually speak to her. I think we all know how it ends
>expense of facts
Like? I don’t think it took many liberties at all. Terror birds did some “dance” to face off against each other for territory or something which I guess is up to interpretation but 99% of it is just portraying mostly factual things, idk.
Implying Morgan freeman wrote the fricking script, how stupid are these "journalists"?
He's the one hamming it up.
This, he knows it's all BS. It's just how he does sarcasm.
It doesn't imply that at all.
then why mention his name at all? is he at fault for the terrible script?
Yes. even a terrible script can be made to sound good by a decent actor. Failing that, it is their responsibility to say "this is shit, do better or I won't put my name to it."
But the article doesn't say anything about his performance. It critiques the words that are said and the script (stuff that has nothing to do with him)
If David Attenborough can make gay T-Rexes sound compelling, Freeman should step up his damn game
Did a journalist steal your gf?
yes a journalist stole your mom from me
That's fricking way out of line
>Fricks
's mom
>Cucks you
Journalistchads, we can't stop winning.
Journalists stole my ability to have a gf.
>palaeontology
>facts
this pretty much
>we know that this dinosaur hunted like this because… because we just know okay!
anthropology is the same way
>we know that cavemen could count because… because we just know okay!
>anthropology is the same way
>find a notched bone
WOMEN INVENTED TIME
Anthropology has no bottom when it comes to moronation
>find remnants of indian tribe that was hunted to extinction before the arrival of Columbus
WHITE PEOPLE INVENTED TIME TRAVEL
i studied palaeontology at uni, you're talking about 'dinosaur enthusiasts' rather than palaeontologists
i no longer do palaeontology as the whole thing has been made insufferable by them
they treat it like a fandom, they have no qualifications, they shout louder on social media so actual palaeontologists dont get their points across
a good example would be when asked what did a Tyrannosaurus look like:
palaeontologist >"there is some debate among academics, we have a number of skin impressions so we can assume that if there were any feathers they would be simple hair like feathers sparsley covering the surface akin to a modern elephant. Now there is some debate over whether they had lips or not and their has been some back and forth over this. We can also tell that they had some cartilaginous structures around the eye.......
dinosaur enthusiast >no body can really say for sure, so i say they looked like big heckin fluffy chickens, with bright blue airsacs....."
The only artists The Guardian criticizes are those who don't' toe the woke line. It's a very shitty paper
This, almost can see the writer's nose with such title.
I remember when that awful illiad show where everyone was black and gay was airing and they would do damage control for it even while it flopped
Fuelled?
Isn't it fueled?
AI needs to replace journos already.
>fueled
That's mutt English.
No.
That's the goyim version.
I forgot this was a thing. Does this documentary cover the paleozoic? Its a fascinating era, I love the giant amphibians and early synapsids, but most documentaries just do Jurassic or later
Basic matter of fact monologue>"insightful" emotional narration trying force some "sense of wonder" onto the viewer>sensationalist "action" commentary
>Basic matter of fact monologue
We haven't had one of those in years. All the recent Attenborough shit is atrocious, he spends the entire time whining about how evil humans are for destroying the poor little habitat of the venusian sea squirrel.
dinosaurs did not have feathers.
Yes they did.
>in a thread about Dinosauria (members of Archosauria), posts a Komodo dragon a member or Squamata
never gonna make it bro
tiktokers are out of their fricking mind
again what do squamates have do do with dinosaurs?
Someone give this komodo dragon glasses and a switch.
every time
Perfection
/qa/ won
Bruh
>PogChamp
they day they changed pogchamp was the day twitch became trash
>Gootecks out
>Twitch tries out different people for PogChamp
>Then just decides to use an already existing global emote
It really did feel like a turning point.
What's funny about the pogchamp change is that they did it to epicly pwn him for his Jan 6th tweets by removing his face.
Of course they forgot that Gooteks absolutely hated pogchamp, and its removal was a total win for him.
What a bawd.
what the frick, that dog has to be alive and conscious in there right? what a way to go
>dog
damn you got me to reply gg
He doesn't even have teeth, I could easily take one on
He does have teeth, they're just below the gumline. And his teeth are both venomous, and coated in nasty bacteria so that infections will finish the job if the poison doesn't. If he bites you, you're dead.
Nah, we have antivenin and antibiotics.
well yeah we also have guns and tanks so whether or not he has teeth is irrelevant if we're allowed to use tools. I thought you meant a barehanded one-on-one fight to the death dealio
>suffocating while you are bathed in stomach acid
what did god mean by this?
atheists
>Nature is so beautiful! No God is needed to create such perfection!
also atheists
>Nature is so cruel! Only an evil God would create it this way!
Only an evil god would create something as stupid as you
>ur stoopid for pointing out my logical fallacies! you can't do that! only atheists like me can point out contradictions in someone's way of thinking! atheist smart! you dumb!
lmao
Your bait has no power here friend
maybe your friends over at r/atheism or /misc/ can help you cope, you precious little b***h
This one needs to have sex
bend over
rentfree topkek
how is /misc/ doing it? It seems impossible for cucks to not permanently think about this shill kindergarten, nowadays populated primarly by other cucks like them?
hi /misc/gay, how's the war in Ukraine going? two more weeks, am I right? Israel will be over too, as well! trust me!
No atheist says the second one. An atheist by definition doesn't believe in an [evil] god you dumb frick
They say that if God made nature he must be evil; thus contradicting the mainstream theist position that "God is good"
Well, yes. Nature is beautiful and cruel, and no god is needed to explain it, malevolent or benevolent.
Its neck was broken well before it was even fully consumed
I was thinking how it's more hilarious that the backwards knees make it easier to go down.
Regardless, beasts are man's domain so they're ours to ponder. If we don't like it we can genocide the lizards. If we think it's funny, we can breed more of them.
Just so long as goat cheese doesn't go away, I don't care.
as usual, the correct response gets no replies
if you want to have good you must have evil
it's not a difficult concept to understand, yet all atheists struggle with it
a shitstian, huh?
riddle me this, luddite. If god is good why am I still a virgin into my 30s?
because he determined your children would be ugly as sin
>If god is good why am I still a virgin into my 30s?
You're most likely not called to sexual relationships.
>eating meat is evil
what theists are universal dualists you philosophically illiterate goddamned moron
lol tell that to someone who's 8 year old child is about to die of leukemia
>only have one child
all the eggs in one basket has never been a wise course of action
just about every bone in its body was broken during the first few bites
suddenly my life don't seem so bad
🙁
>howdy sir, how is it -ACK
post the one were the komodo eats the newborn directly from its dying mother
They used to have lizards three times that size in Australia.
The Abbos wiped them out with aggressive slash and burn hunting and then forgot how to make fire.
...how does one forget fire?
White Supremacy
Suddenly, I’m hungry for mutton
some did some didn't
anything larger than a cow didnt
it varied by clade
Yutyrannus was bigger than a cow
dinosaurs did not exist
It should be illegal to have CGI in a "nature documentary"
Yes, they should travel back millions of years to film the dinosaurs for real
Unironically yes.
Sounds dangerous,I'll allow cgi this time.
Thank you for understanding
yeah travel back in time and document all the lies. fricking dinosaurs. id rather believe in the farce of racial equality which is equally unprovable.
Small lizards standing in for big lizards is acceptable.
If you're gonna lie to us, at least be charming about it.
>Particularly as it comes at the expense of facts
Okay, what does this documentary claim that's actually got them mad?
>Nature programmes used to celebrate how enormous and wondrous our world is. Then the climate crisis forced them to adapt, so they became programmes about how wondrous our world was, and still could be, if we could only stop damaging it. Now, wildlife series are evolving again, and Life on Our Planet is part of a new breed that looks at humanity killing itself, and says: hey, nature has been through worse than this before. Here, the story that will happily carry on without us is told to us as an awesome, cinematic epic.
>Those small moments illustrate how mammals, reptiles, arthropods, fish, cephalopods and other “dynasties”, as the programme likes to call them, established themselves via natural selection. “Throughout history, life has been waging an unending war,” says Morgan Freeman’s film-trailer voiceover, slightly nonsensically. “One dynasty rising, only to be vanquished by the next.”
>As well as treating billions of animals in the same broad biological grouping as if they were an army or a sports team enjoying success together
>You can see why Life on Our Planet has gone in that direction: epochal events are hard to capture in images, so it’s trying to make us feel the hugeness of what’s happening with words. But if the series was less concerned with constantly reinforcing how incredible everything is, it could have found room to be more informative. Watch the show with an inquisitive child and you might find them asking questions that the programme doesn’t answer, such as what caused the spikes and falls in oxygen/CO2 levels that led to the mass extinctions of the ancient past
So what? They object to them using terminology which compares survival of the fittest to a war and they b***h that there's not in-depth shit on what caused some mass extinctions even though this seemingly isn't the focus of the documentary?
Wtf is this hit piece? Do they think he's the one writing the script? Are they moronic?
They had to lower its marks because it did not follow the globalist agenda fully. Freeman was just collateral damage. It's like when their editor sees an article saying that Russian soldiers are humans too and censors it.
I see, thanks anon. Sounds like the usual blahblah. Disney's dinoshow was better in this regard.
>what caused the spikes and falls in oxygen/CO2 levels that led to the mass extinctions of the ancient past
There were mass extinctions directly caused by CO2? The frick is this homosexual going on about?
trust the pop science, chud
>This majestic brontosaurus will die out due to man-made climate change.
Why not?
Yes, there were a couple I think. Basically, life at the time converted all the available atmosphere to c02 without there being any/enough organisms to convert it back. The greenhouse effect added onto that.
So life on earth just stopped? When was this supposedly?
>Americans lose their minds when someone suggests that things on Earth may have used to be a little different thousands of millions of years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event4kyapj
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxidation_Event4kyapj
>4kyapj
kys phoneposter
>frick up typing captcha
>must mean he's on a phone
you Black folk are dumb, if he was a phoneposter, wouldn't he link to the mobile version of wikipedia with .m. in the url
>some shit about bacteria dying when there wasn't even a real biosphere
That's not what I meant.
Yes?
Some of them yes, including the largest one, the Premian-Triassic.
Apparently caused by megavolcanoes erupting in a short period of time
Not really comparable to taking Jurassic biocarbon and steadily putting it back into the biosphere
The worst conceivable outcome of putting Jurassic levels of carbon into the biosphere is that the Earth will go back to the Jurassic period; i.e. a really awesome tropical paradise
Do you know how many mass extinction events there have been, an early one killed nearly of all life on earth at the time
We're talking "volcanoes hundreds of miles wide erupting for hundreds of thousands of years" co2 levels, not the "parts per million" they're on about now. I think it was like 20 times the current levels with a massive collapse in photosynthesis and ozone weakening causing huge amounts of radiation to get down to the surface.
Or they just made that shit up.
from volcanos mostly, they conveniently ignore the sulfur and ash
Permian–Triassic extinction event
The Permian–Triassic (P–T, P–Tr) extinction event (PTME), also known as the Late Permian extinction event,[3] the Latest Permian extinction event,[4] the End-Permian extinction event,[5][6] and colloquially as the Great Dying,[7][8] forms the boundary between the Permian and Triassic geologic periods, and with them the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras respectively, approximately 251.9 million years ago.[9] As the largest of the "Big Five" mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic,[10] it is the Earth's most severe known extinction event,[11][12] with the extinction of 57% of biological families, 83% of genera, 81% of marine species[13][14][15] and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species.[16] It is also the largest known mass extinction of insects.[17] There is evidence for one to three distinct pulses, or phases, of extinction.[16][18]
The precise causes of the Great Dying remain unknown. The scientific consensus is that the main cause of extinction was the flood basalt volcanic eruptions that created the Siberian Traps,[19] which released sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, resulting in euxinia and anoxia,[20] [21] elevating global temperatures,[22][23][24] and acidifying the oceans.[25][26][3] The level of atmospheric carbon dioxide rose from around 400 ppm to 2,500 ppm with approximately 3,900 to 12,000 gigatonnes of carbon being added to the ocean-atmosphere system during this period.[22]
So you're saying human CO2 release is a drop in the ocean compared to natural events like volcanos and even if we went zero carbon forever we'd still have a climate that changes? You antiscience chud! Only humans (specifically my team of humans) can save the planet, and only through massive taxation
I can kinda see why they are mad now, you can't imply that nature would do fine with climate change or how there have been bigger global scale events in the past.
Knew it had to be something like this for Guardian slop blog to turn on a PoC
Globohomosexual uses climate panic to trick proles into accepting lower standards of living.
I completely agree. The Planet Earth series and it's consequences have been a disaster for the natural history genre.
Planet Earth 1 was kino of the highest order and has nothing to do with how crappy the other docs are today. If people want to imitate it and fail that's their problem
>climate crisis
>crisis
Is this the new meme?
Yes, gotta keep changing the lingo until we're all poor and starving in the cold, dark hellscape they're creating.
>poor
free from the burden of managing money
>and starving
not obese
>in the cold
in a pleasantly cool
>dark
post-light punk
>hellscape
sanctuary of the benevolent and misunderstood Satan
>they're creating.
that has risen naturally and without prompting or influence, as a result of humanity evolving progressively toward our Utopian ideals.
And that's a good thing!
Very funny anon
Few years old now, think they're using climate calamity or catastrophe more
You sure don't live in Florida
What I would give to kidnap Morgan Freeman and make his life a living hell. I would force him to dress up in elf and leprechaun outfits and subject him to pure awfulness and humiliation. Just terrible degradation and shameful acts. It would be so easy to break his spirit and drive him to suicide, but I wouldn't let him do it. If I could train a dog to rape on command then I would totally do that as well. A really big dog like a mastiff. He would be so completely and utterly powerless to stop it, not to mention terrified. A big ass dog is even scary and life-threatening to a normal human but to a midget? Might as well be a dragon. I'd keep him in a cell and what's more is that I would actually place the key inside with him but put it in a high place. Not extremely high but just ever so slightly out of reach. It would drive him mad. I would dress him like a baby and force feed him 99 cent store baby food. I'd also pick him up like a child and toss him from one corner to the next. I'd grab him by one leg and swing him as hard and as fast as I could then hurl him to see how far he goes. I'd rent one of those giant inflatable bounce houses and body slam him all day until my arms got tired. I'd hold him down with 1 hand and slowly stick things up his butt just to see him squirm. I would stick him in dryers and turn them on and leave him in there for long periods of time. I'd force him to fight other midgets to the death. Just so many things i would do.
What did he say? Something like climate change aware dinosaurs?
>Renowned for having a great speaking voice and has been doing narration for decades
>People just now have a problem with it
This is the new hill journos are going to die on? They all deserve the bullet.
it's funnier because the only reason the reviewers have a problem with this is because the script didn't mention Global Warming and how we need to combat it by eating the bugs, importing the immigrant and donating to the BLM
If only you cared about where your tax money goes as much as a millionaire getting a bad review.
Autistic rich daddy homosexuals dug up 3 ounces of a hip bone and half of a tooth and told people God's not real because they dug up the bones of giant lizards and now here we are.
Aliens don't matter, real or not. FTL is impossible. We all die in Sol.
We couldn't even go to the nearest star because it's a trinary system, completely uninhabitable due to the completely random and chaotic orbits that could never ever be predicted even if the whole universe was a computer.
Morgan Freeman isn't the one who writes the dialogue for the show. He's just there to read and provide the voice.
here's the real reason
I havent seen this yet. Anyone care to share a MEGA link, please?
Hey you can't call him that. He's a free man now.
It was the longest night of my life.
>cliches
No troony dinosaurs.
>Yet another "documentary" featuring extremely speculative renditions of long-dead animals based on bone fragments found in a construction site
I don't think Freeman writes his own voice-overs anon
>"huh why so low ratings for a hamless nature documen-"
>it's an american nature documentary
>reading the grauniad
ngmi
I'm just glad to see a series that actually shows pre-mammalian synapsids again. Shame that dinosaurs get all the attention, especially end-Cretaceous ones.
Yeah. As a paleonerd who loves prehistoric life documentaries and really felt the era of scarcity of the late 2010s I welcome any kind of decent documentary as long as it isn't absolute garbage like the Stephen Fry doc.
What do you expect? Freeman literally declared himself to be God.
Morgan "blackamoor" Slaveman is a hack fraud and I'm tired of pretending he's not.
Reminder that every single fossil that was supposed to prove the link between man and ape either went missing or was accidentally destroyed, or in the case of the "Lucy" fossil, was just the skeleton of an ape
Dat dino sure was a tall drink o water, n'such.
There is only one narrator I want to hear... As Im strapped to a meteor thats headed towards prehistoric Earth. The key to the Armageddon style nuke is locked in a safe and the only one who knows the passcode to the safe is my crush. In order to get the code, all i have to do is call her on the phone and actually speak to her. I think we all know how it ends
replace Life on Our Planet by Lucy, keep it all like that: it's ok, baby.
Take the SNEED pill:
Space is Fake
Nukes aren't real
Evolution is a lie.
Earth is Flat.
Dinosaurs never existed.
I'm right and all you you have to do to agree with me is go aginst like 50 israelites.
and this salamander clearly did no wrong, and yet lizards be eat'n him every time, a salamander can't get ahead in a lizard boy world y'all
>The Guardian
Frick off, moron.
Why are paleo-troonys so annoying? Where did they come from?
Good question. I have no clue but I'm grateful I left my dinosaur autism back in 2nd grade.
>Only have 1% of the total fossil record
>Continue to make CGI fantasies where all of those 1% of lifeforms live with one another in a forest
Why did jannie delete the post >morgan Black person freeman
? Huh? Whats wrong with that, he is a Black person.
saying naughty words that might hurt feelies is LITERALLY genocide
They hate this show because it's positive and not preachy. That's it
>expense of facts
Like? I don’t think it took many liberties at all. Terror birds did some “dance” to face off against each other for territory or something which I guess is up to interpretation but 99% of it is just portraying mostly factual things, idk.