>Wasn't this Doom omnipotent?
You can see he clearly is not.
Doom was omnipotent but also lazy as frick. It's why he kept Dr Strange around, to have him do all of the administrative work running the planet and keeping the various heroes and villains running Battleworlds' fiefdoms in line, so Doom could concentrate on fricking a mindraped Susan Storm.
she's a copy of a mutant that was believed to be stillborn then grew as a mass of cells on a sewer wall. the mass of cells part is enough for her to be counted genetically as mutant since she is a copy of xavier
>in the 2010s
lmao
Even after completely destroying the brand and buying Fox to get the movie rights, D*sney is still stomping the X-Men into the mud. Why? Pure spite, I can only guess.
>oldgay that was a Marvel kid, especially loved X books >getting into reading comics, think the current X-Men looks interesting >figure I'll start with the classic Claremont run, read a whole bunch of stuff up to present date to prime myself for Krakoa era so I'll understand what's going on >it worked amazing on my Green Lantern read as the original Hal issues introduce Quard, Sinestro, and all kinds of stuff that immediately carried over to the Johns run and equipped me beautifully >very first story in the Uncanny X-Men Masterworks #1, the X-Men send Krakoa hurtling through space, away from Earth, with zero fricks given
Son of a fricking b***h!! What?!
You have no idea. At one point there were no mutant titles aside from Death of X and the title should tell you everything. Deadpool may be lumped in with mutants but he's actually not a mutant. And then when the Inhuman push failed they hastily announced a bunch of X-titles. It was so rushed they didn't have any images or creative teams, just the titles. The F4 was also phased out where their book was cancelled and Brevoort blamed it on people not buying it but IIRC it was still over cancellation numbers and selling more than other ongoings that Marvel kept putting out. Why? Because of movie rights. It was ridiculous.
>At one point there were no mutant titles aside from Death of X
Don't lie. That pic you posted was just advertising #1s and story arcs starting that month.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_40,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_41,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_42,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_43,_2016
There were five ongoing X-Men books running the month the Death of X mini started, All-New X-Men, Extraordinary X-Men, Uncanny X-Men, Old Man Logan, All-New Wolverine, plus the X-Men '92 cartoon book, and five different Deadpool books if you want to count those. This is easily verifiable, and yet you still pretend Marvel actually cancelled all the X-Men books the same way they did to Fantastic Four, so you can be angry about something that never even happened.
Wasn't this Doom omnipotent?
What was stopping him from knowing where Dr. Strange sent the others?
>Wasn't this Doom omnipotent?
You can see he clearly is not.
Omnipotent is not omniscience.
Shouldn't an omnipotent being be able to give itself omniscience?
>Shouldn't an omnipotent being be able to give itself omniscience?
Yup, as Doom once said himself.
Doom wasn't truly omnipotent. Doom was being empowered by Molecule Man. Molecule Man is powerful but he was neither omnipotent nor omniscience.
He was borrowing power from Molecule Man
Doom was omnipotent but also lazy as frick. It's why he kept Dr Strange around, to have him do all of the administrative work running the planet and keeping the various heroes and villains running Battleworlds' fiefdoms in line, so Doom could concentrate on fricking a mindraped Susan Storm.
Blame Ike Perlmutter
>in the 2010s
Marvel still hates mutants, anon. the mutant they hate the most is Beast
don't forget bendis
doom did that to everyone in that event
Cassandra Nova wasn't a mutant
she's a copy of a mutant that was believed to be stillborn then grew as a mass of cells on a sewer wall. the mass of cells part is enough for her to be counted genetically as mutant since she is a copy of xavier
Wasn't that bad a world where like half the comics in it was based on mutant events?
Wasn't that Battleworld where like half the comics in it was based on mutant events?
Yes but that was 616 Cyclops
>in the 2010s
lmao
Even after completely destroying the brand and buying Fox to get the movie rights, D*sney is still stomping the X-Men into the mud. Why? Pure spite, I can only guess.
I forgot about that. Cyclops fans settled down for a while after that
>oldgay that was a Marvel kid, especially loved X books
>getting into reading comics, think the current X-Men looks interesting
>figure I'll start with the classic Claremont run, read a whole bunch of stuff up to present date to prime myself for Krakoa era so I'll understand what's going on
>it worked amazing on my Green Lantern read as the original Hal issues introduce Quard, Sinestro, and all kinds of stuff that immediately carried over to the Johns run and equipped me beautifully
>very first story in the Uncanny X-Men Masterworks #1, the X-Men send Krakoa hurtling through space, away from Earth, with zero fricks given
Son of a fricking b***h!! What?!
You have no idea. At one point there were no mutant titles aside from Death of X and the title should tell you everything. Deadpool may be lumped in with mutants but he's actually not a mutant. And then when the Inhuman push failed they hastily announced a bunch of X-titles. It was so rushed they didn't have any images or creative teams, just the titles. The F4 was also phased out where their book was cancelled and Brevoort blamed it on people not buying it but IIRC it was still over cancellation numbers and selling more than other ongoings that Marvel kept putting out. Why? Because of movie rights. It was ridiculous.
>not realizing that GLA is literally a mutant book too
>At one point there were no mutant titles aside from Death of X
Don't lie. That pic you posted was just advertising #1s and story arcs starting that month.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_40,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_41,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_42,_2016
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Week_43,_2016
There were five ongoing X-Men books running the month the Death of X mini started, All-New X-Men, Extraordinary X-Men, Uncanny X-Men, Old Man Logan, All-New Wolverine, plus the X-Men '92 cartoon book, and five different Deadpool books if you want to count those. This is easily verifiable, and yet you still pretend Marvel actually cancelled all the X-Men books the same way they did to Fantastic Four, so you can be angry about something that never even happened.