Regardless of how you feel about Adum, you can't deny he is one of the best at what he does and he alongside RLM and maybe E;R has the biggest influence on media criticism
Imagine calling yourself adum instead of Adam like it's cute. Then imagine this butthole actually calling that furry gay adum instead of calling him zoophile sodimite
YMS is autistic, so those thought processes come naturally to him. With Mauler you can sense the gears in his brain turning in casual conversation, yet YMS responds instinctively. I'd say Mauler is the fraud if you're going to point fingers at anyone here.
It's actually not that good. It was pretty indulgent and he rambles a lot through much of it. At some points he sounds legit tired. His other reviews are great but this one needed to be trimmed and structured better
but why pick this film to make a 40000h video essay on? why not pick an actually interesting film, something influential and memorable and relevant in cinema history.
in fact, all these youtube guys do is pick bad films and talk endlessly about plot holes and bad cgi. its honestly revolting that this has become the basic film criticism
frick this furry
You two only prove my point more.
That's nice, dog rapist.
>t. my dog's anus
First post muhfuggin best post, frick what the OP says
this. vid sucks shit too
You Black folk are exactly why film criticism and Cinemaphile as an extension aren't taken seriously.
>2 hours 40 minutes
>Part 1
Who the frick watches this?
Severely autistic morons.
I feel like it's gotta be background noise for NEETs to game to
Dumbfricks like op
i can barely handle listening to his voice for 5 mins let alone 160
>Part 2 won't be coming out this year
Damn Adam, that's stretching shit out.
The HL-sound effects gag made me giggle though
I wasn't planning to, but one midterm night i got depressed and put it on while drinking, it was alright, a bit repetitve but whatever
Regardless of how you feel about Adum, you can't deny he is one of the best at what he does and he alongside RLM and maybe E;R has the biggest influence on media criticism
who the frick is e;r
Imagine calling yourself adum instead of Adam like it's cute. Then imagine this butthole actually calling that furry gay adum instead of calling him zoophile sodimite
YMS is just discount MauLer
YMS is autistic, so those thought processes come naturally to him. With Mauler you can sense the gears in his brain turning in casual conversation, yet YMS responds instinctively. I'd say Mauler is the fraud if you're going to point fingers at anyone here.
This looks like my cat who died two years ago.
I'm sorry bro, my cat too died in the last couple of years and I still think about him. Send more cat reaction pics to fill tha void
That's a great looking cat.
He came years before Mauler how is he a discount of him?
The hydrox paradox.
Did he want to rape the lions?
Scar yes
He's more a dog person.
It's actually not that good. It was pretty indulgent and he rambles a lot through much of it. At some points he sounds legit tired. His other reviews are great but this one needed to be trimmed and structured better
I really like his Kimba video, that shit was well researched and eyes opening
But 4h+ to tell me nu-disney is dogshit, that's gonn a be a pass for me
>WHAT ARE YOU DOING JON
>WHY ARE YOU DOING THAT JON
>JON
The review was full of this padded out bullshit. It’s not even funny.
I couldn't watch this even if I wanted to because his voice is painfully annoying.
So is Mauler's and you gays suck him off anyway
Literally who?
if you watch video essays or make video essays you're a fricking loser
Is it true that Adam is obsessed with The Lion King because his brother fingered his butthole during the movie?
but why pick this film to make a 40000h video essay on? why not pick an actually interesting film, something influential and memorable and relevant in cinema history.
in fact, all these youtube guys do is pick bad films and talk endlessly about plot holes and bad cgi. its honestly revolting that this has become the basic film criticism
when movie criticism is 4x longer than the thing it's critiquing that person needs a fricking editor.
Already knew that the remake was soulless shit, but the stuff about the 1994 version was actually interesting.