Obviously this is bait but Tom Cruise got ahead because he's handsome and a decent actor. Holland I think basically has the appeal of being a cute boy so his manlet status isn't a big problem. As he gets older it might become a problem though.
why do you keep making this thread, homo? I know you have a crush on left one but just stick to jerking off to the thought of bottoming for the guy you absolute homosexual
Bait thread but it is way easier to film someone in perspective shots or make them look normal next to objects in edits if they are smaller themselves. It's the sweet spot between magic johnson and danny devito that really gets the camera wet.
Not likely. What's Holland been in besides Spider-Man? That Uncharted movie bombed, he hasn't got enough charisma to carry a movie on name recognition alone. Cruise on the other hand is extremely recognisable and doesn't need to be attached to a franchise in order to sell tickets.
Cruise has his life's work to back him up, Holland is just getting started. The comparison should be whether Holland has the potential to become a Cruise-like figure. I think he could if he picks enough good roles.
Kek. No. Holland is a shitty actor. He tried to branch out in some indie flicks but he still can't act to save his life.
He even gets eclipsed in his most successful movies and required iron manlet, the MCU and nostalgia bait to rescue him.
Imagine unironically believing Holland can act and then comparing him to Cruise. Luckily I know you're being ironic you little scamp.
>Tom Holland
>”movie star”
>Is literally only known for 1 role in capes hit by 13 year old girls
Don’t compare him to Cruise.
British people can’t be movie stars. They’re just capeshit actors for hire on a budget.
Rent free
I wonder if Brad Pitt feels any pressure for Bullet Train to be a hit.
Nah, he's pretty much doing whatever he wants now.. Hell, he was in that Bullock romcom The Lost City where he gets his brains blown out.
I only care about johnny depp
Obviously this is bait but Tom Cruise got ahead because he's handsome and a decent actor. Holland I think basically has the appeal of being a cute boy so his manlet status isn't a big problem. As he gets older it might become a problem though.
I heard Holland got the part because he did a backflip in the spidey audition.
He was never a star and he's hit the wall now. It's over for him.
Holland got ahead because he's a israelite and a twink, he probably has (or had) more sex appeal to teenage girls
Holland is not a israelite
Then explain that image
His grandfather is from the isle of man, a tax haven home to weird sex cults. He's culturally israeli.
no
>home to weird sex cults.
qrd?
he definitely has israelite ancestry
>gimme that James May look
>I gotchu senpai, say no more
Was there ever a female movie star?
Why is his face so puffy and inhuman?
he's preparing for the role of norm macdonald in the biopic
They are incapable of ever learning, evne learning that their time is past.
cope, lanklet, Hollywood is manlet territory
one is being propped up by David Miscavige, the other is being propped up by disney. outside of their influences, no one actually cares about either.
Tom Holland just need to stop to being a homosexual and demand the Black Cat in the Spider-Man franchise with that cleavage
wypeepol got not lips
Never EVER call Tom Holland a movie star again. Got it?
Film Star?
why do you keep making this thread, homo? I know you have a crush on left one but just stick to jerking off to the thought of bottoming for the guy you absolute homosexual
Bait thread but it is way easier to film someone in perspective shots or make them look normal next to objects in edits if they are smaller themselves. It's the sweet spot between magic johnson and danny devito that really gets the camera wet.
How does some random capeshit actor compare to Tom Cruise in any way?
Both are movie stars
Not likely. What's Holland been in besides Spider-Man? That Uncharted movie bombed, he hasn't got enough charisma to carry a movie on name recognition alone. Cruise on the other hand is extremely recognisable and doesn't need to be attached to a franchise in order to sell tickets.
Cruise has his life's work to back him up, Holland is just getting started. The comparison should be whether Holland has the potential to become a Cruise-like figure. I think he could if he picks enough good roles.
Kek. No. Holland is a shitty actor. He tried to branch out in some indie flicks but he still can't act to save his life.
He even gets eclipsed in his most successful movies and required iron manlet, the MCU and nostalgia bait to rescue him.
Now this is cope, he is a fantastic actor nobody can deny that
Based on what exactly? Your homosexual lust for him doesn't count as a valid reason.
His many showcases of his acting ability
>Based on what exactly?
Movies
>and doesn't need to be attached to a franchise in order to sell tickets.
PFFFFFFFFFFT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
.
Timothy Charlemagne is one of the ugliest israelites they've ever forced
Robert Pattinson is more ancient than those two though
Tom Cruise isn’t a manlet
being a manlet is a trial by fire
forces you to develop your charms