there are avg scores for everything too. There's literally nothing better than what RT invented with that % thing
high % critics score + high avg (over 8,3) - almost always kino
high % critics score + low audience score - almost always kino (literally picked hundreds kinos that way)
The only thing you need to know is MCU movies have high % scores that don't make any sense. I tried a big bunch of them to have my own opinion and i only managed to finish the hulk with Edward Norton. The rest is so poorly made (in a way critics literally always hate) that i can't explain it any other way than bribery. Also, horror movies with fresh scores but low number of reviews are a lottery because every other rando with a blog is considered critic and they often overrate trashy horrors. Other than that? This site is perfect
you're only seething about it because you're insecure in your opinions and you fear you might be a pleb
No, it means all 12 reviews were generally positive rather than disapproving. So, it could even mean all reviewers gave it 60% and said "Yeah, I recommend warching it".
They deem reviews around the middle as "mixed" and ask the reviewer if he was "mixed-positive" or "mixed-negative" and then count them as positive or negative respectively.
Shows that aggressively force diversity and check the ESG check boxes get automatically bumped into the 90% range. There are metrics in place where story, execution and composition are secondary to political/social agendas
Frankly, sometimes the critcs are wrong and the audience is right, sometimes they are right and the audience are morons. Often times they are both moronic. It's a total crapshoot these days.
Rotten Tomatoes are owned by Comcast now. One of the big five of the loxist israeli supremacist media giants attacking white European blooded gentiles through the world. Watch Europa the last battle.
Critics are professionals and give objective reviews while 'audience' is dominated by vocal minority of screeching chudcels who are probably mad at someone being gay or black
Imagine choking this worm and watching him squirm around, knowing he's so weak there is literally nothing he could do to stop you from finishing him off with one bare hand. The look in his eyes would be so satisfying.
>an American cartoon vaguely based on a Japanese video game kinda based on a British novel sorta based on an romanian prince. >it has Black folk in it
bravo israeliteflix
no one gives a frick about the haitian revolution because saint domingue became a shit hole after Black folk took over what even the point.
Oh wo fought for our freedom and nuked the island and 200 years later were a shithole, its not really a compelling narrative
>12 paid shills praise the "diversity" in a shitty adaption with 100% affirmative action score vs 250+ actual people gave realistic score >claims democratic results are "useless" when the not as dictated
>thinks critics are some bastion of quality >the same critics that gave slop like Get Out and Black Panther ratings comparable to the fricking Godfather
You know this point might have more credibility if critics didn’t spend the last 10-15 years completely torpedoing their credibility in favor of pandering to SJWs and rating films based on “representation” rather than quality.
With film, high critical reviews and low audience score can often be a marker of quality. The average consoomer is a braindead monkey that couldn't spot kino if it hit them in the face.
With series it's a different deal though. The "critics" that get assigned to review series are failed movie critics that review based on clicks and twitter engagement.
12 people cannot possibly be any sort of concensus. Anyone still looking to RT basically just has a malignant tumor where their brain is supposed to be.
Still not watching it.
havent seen it and i may but how the FRICK is it 100%? nothing is 100% AVERAGE. that means all 12 reviews gave it a perfect score
Not how rotten tomatoes works, that just means 100% of critics had positive ratings, but their rating system is still shit
there are avg scores for everything too. There's literally nothing better than what RT invented with that % thing
high % critics score + high avg (over 8,3) - almost always kino
high % critics score + low audience score - almost always kino (literally picked hundreds kinos that way)
The only thing you need to know is MCU movies have high % scores that don't make any sense. I tried a big bunch of them to have my own opinion and i only managed to finish the hulk with Edward Norton. The rest is so poorly made (in a way critics literally always hate) that i can't explain it any other way than bribery. Also, horror movies with fresh scores but low number of reviews are a lottery because every other rando with a blog is considered critic and they often overrate trashy horrors. Other than that? This site is perfect
you're only seething about it because you're insecure in your opinions and you fear you might be a pleb
As long as you ignore the fact RT takes bribes of their own to push the percentage one way or the other, yeah I guess.
sauce?
How the frick do you morons still don't get what rt is
at this point i have to assume you're either trolling or have brain damage
No, it means all 12 reviews were generally positive rather than disapproving. So, it could even mean all reviewers gave it 60% and said "Yeah, I recommend warching it".
50% would mean 6 disliked it and 6 were positive.
Except that sometimes RT has been caught deeming 60% reviews as negative and 40% reviews as positive for some reason
They deem reviews around the middle as "mixed" and ask the reviewer if he was "mixed-positive" or "mixed-negative" and then count them as positive or negative respectively.
>t. never seen Black Panther
You are too moronic to function
8 critics out of 10 say it's a masterpiece, 2 say it's a piece of shit: 80%
10 critics out of 10 that say it's overall ok: 100%
I am amazed by how fricking stupid you morons are.
UGH like I KNOW right? These chuds probably don't even know how upvote karma works either!
None is advocating Rotten Tomatoes. RT is cancer.
But you are the one paying attention to it, and you are also too stupid to understand how it works.
this is your excuse to not understanding how something so simple works?
>i may
Every single person who sees it loves it, chud
>53%
Shows that aggressively force diversity and check the ESG check boxes get automatically bumped into the 90% range. There are metrics in place where story, execution and composition are secondary to political/social agendas
>proves the uselessness of user reviews
actually it proves quite the opposite
>the audience is wrong, our critics are right
Frankly, sometimes the critcs are wrong and the audience is right, sometimes they are right and the audience are morons. Often times they are both moronic. It's a total crapshoot these days.
i never even watched the last one because all i heard people talk about was the homosexual shit.
Rotten Tomatoes are owned by Comcast now. One of the big five of the loxist israeli supremacist media giants attacking white European blooded gentiles through the world. Watch Europa the last battle.
Critics are professionals and give objective reviews while 'audience' is dominated by vocal minority of screeching chudcels who are probably mad at someone being gay or black
Trust the expert shadow-images. Do not do your own cave exploring.
Why don't studios just pay users the same way they pay critics?
Imagine choking this worm and watching him squirm around, knowing he's so weak there is literally nothing he could do to stop you from finishing him off with one bare hand. The look in his eyes would be so satisfying.
It was written by a fat black woman so it's no surprise
Is she hot?
Does anyone actually trust ~~*Critics*~~ opinions anymore
>an American cartoon vaguely based on a Japanese video game kinda based on a British novel sorta based on an romanian prince.
>it has Black folk in it
bravo israeliteflix
no one gives a frick about the haitian revolution because saint domingue became a shit hole after Black folk took over what even the point.
Oh wo fought for our freedom and nuked the island and 200 years later were a shithole, its not really a compelling narrative
>12 paid shills praise the "diversity" in a shitty adaption with 100% affirmative action score vs 250+ actual people gave realistic score
>claims democratic results are "useless" when the not as dictated
>thinks critics are some bastion of quality
>the same critics that gave slop like Get Out and Black Panther ratings comparable to the fricking Godfather
190522601
nice bait
You know this point might have more credibility if critics didn’t spend the last 10-15 years completely torpedoing their credibility in favor of pandering to SJWs and rating films based on “representation” rather than quality.
It's hilarious how much of a complete disaster this show has been
It's funny how the critic/audience split used to be over esoteric arthouse stuff but now it's over baby shows based on video games.
With film, high critical reviews and low audience score can often be a marker of quality. The average consoomer is a braindead monkey that couldn't spot kino if it hit them in the face.
With series it's a different deal though. The "critics" that get assigned to review series are failed movie critics that review based on clicks and twitter engagement.
12 people cannot possibly be any sort of concensus. Anyone still looking to RT basically just has a malignant tumor where their brain is supposed to be.