No one is going to sit through 3 hours of boring and loud Nolan crap just to watch an anemic bedroom scene with some flabby breasts flopping around while they both talk about atoms
Reminder that this freak is a communist who claims its a professional film reviewer when in reality its propped up by its rich parents. It also constantly talks about being a hurricane katrina survivor while being rich so it fled town but it was super traumatizing because its house in the French Quarter COULD have been flooded.
THE German film critic??? Only betas, incels and women care what other men think.
Here's the last paragraph.
>Unfortunately, Christopher Nolan seems to be one of the few filmmakers who doesn't gain in staging finesse with experience but loses it. The decelerated days of a "Memento" are long gone, but stories like those of Robert Oppenheimer are not compatible with his current narrative style, which tries to conceal the banality of many plot elements with time and tempo games. But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
we're so fricking back
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
that sounds fun. did this gay just want some boring daytime television recap of oppenheimers life?
The irony in all this is plebs think Nolan is the saviour of kinema because he uses documentary cameras to film his flicks. >omg muh 72mm muh high quality 8k omg look at that high definition
Barbie is soul.
OPenheimer is gay af.
Im watching it 3 nights this weekend with 3 different bawds.
He never once mentioned plot
I agree with the reviewer. Dunkirk was the same. An over the top wall of sound over documentary looking shots of paper soldiers.
Nolan is finished.
Nolan is part of the hipster group that believes movies should be immersive
They should take over all your senses so you are overwhelmed by the experience.
That's why reddit adores him. It's escapism at its finest.
Should have stuck to capekino
Everything else he's made has been awful.
Interstellar was only decent because he stole everything from 2001.
After this flops he will come groveling back.
I should be posting this to Cinemaphile but I'll say it here anyways. I believe David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest to be a satire of overly intellectual works that seek to be deeper than they usually are. You see this in Rick and Morty, the very antithesis of sincerity. DFW was a fan of non stop action flicks that Cinemaphile would dismiss as goyslop. The whole point of films is the same as vidya: to entertain with an optional message on the side that you don't have to think much about. This is why I dislike most critics except for maybe Siskel and Ebert, they miss the obvious point of entertainment. It's nice to see fun movies with scenes of non stop action.
Honestly I think we're gonna fricking win. DFW literally and unironically, with explicit and unambiguous sincerity, was an early advocate of abandoning postmodernism because he believed it had far outstayed its welcome, was destroying society, and the cynicism it bled into pop culture was corrosive and tiresome at best. Increasingly, pop culture works aren't either conformant to postmodernism or ambivalent, if not just outright postmodern works, but instead are directly critical of postmodernism, using the pillars of postmodern thought as a foundation for the subversion of its conclusions and a return to sincerity. So not just a return to modernism like in the past, but a genuine post-postmodern framework. And a lot of people, even some people in opposition to wokeshit/progs, are deeply steeped in postmodern ideology itself and seethe like fricking maniacs when their ideological framework is embraced, coopted, and then used to thoroughly rebuke their nihilistic worldview and construct in some respects more potent meta-narratives than existed under modernism in massively popular media. The consequence is that there's an increasing amount of criticism generated towards media that has nothing to do with the work itself, nor has any staying or relevant meta-commentary, but is just immense seethe at the rejection of their previously uncritically accepted worldview in a manner they don't have the ability to critique.
The 1960s was the golden age of sincerity, I hope it returns. I can't explain the cynicism that emerged afterwards, but we need to go back to being apolitical. I just wanna grill for God's sake.
>Christopher Nolan has a warning for anyone purchasing “Oppenheimer” tickets: The film might emotionally destroy you. >“Some people leave the movie absolutely devastated,” Nolan said about early screenings. “They can’t speak."
Why is Nolan like this?
>Nolan attends screening >Movie ends >People leave quietly >"Don't you see? They are so emotionally devastated by my movie they cannot even speak! I really AM a genius!"
This gets spammed in entire thread: >But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
Movie is going to be frickin gay in one way or another. If this was made in 1990 it'd be a stately adult film about adults making adult choices, it'd have the prestige of a finely furnished Gentlemen's office. Now it's going to be stupid stylistic booming sounds and probably sweaty fricking in slow motions, I bet this is going to be one of those movies where you can see the main actor's butthole because "artists" thing "asses are the ultimate form of art". It's going to be gay in a gay way, anyone with half a brain can glance and tell.
Paul Schrader said it was good so I don’t care about what some Kraut has to say
Maybe they can have a mud wrestle?
i'd be afraid to fight Schrader. he seems like he has nothing to lose
Who cares what Schrader says
legendary screenwriter and director vs a random nobody germoid "critic", I wonder whose opinion holds more weight.
>I don't care about what some Kraut has to say
>Schrader
Barbiebros get in here! Lets goooo
THE German film critic??? Only betas, incels and women care what other men think.
Movies are the thoughts of men transfered to audiovisual you homosexual
Lots of seething women in the comments.
Those must be trannies, women don't care about this movie
He put in a 15 minute sex scene with feminist icon Pugh specifically for the woman audience, and also the ESG bux.
No one is going to sit through 3 hours of boring and loud Nolan crap just to watch an anemic bedroom scene with some flabby breasts flopping around while they both talk about atoms
>15 minute sex scene
Jesus Christ
it's 30 seconds total
that german critic's name? Albert Einstein
This is the top critic on letterboxd
Here's his Video about Oppenheimer
>he makes videos now
oh lord
Im talking about the german
>wanted to seize the means of production but couldn't even seize his hairline
These people would be the first to be thrown to the gulag
Translation: "Der film ist der absolute mist"
>that background
He looks like the german version of Chris Stuckman, his opinion is immediately discarded.
What type of body shape would you describe for this behemoth troony?
What the frick its even more terrifying in motion
Reminder that this freak is a communist who claims its a professional film reviewer when in reality its propped up by its rich parents. It also constantly talks about being a hurricane katrina survivor while being rich so it fled town but it was super traumatizing because its house in the French Quarter COULD have been flooded.
>(kekyadayada kek)
What did he mean by this?
Here's the last paragraph.
>Unfortunately, Christopher Nolan seems to be one of the few filmmakers who doesn't gain in staging finesse with experience but loses it. The decelerated days of a "Memento" are long gone, but stories like those of Robert Oppenheimer are not compatible with his current narrative style, which tries to conceal the banality of many plot elements with time and tempo games. But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
He's a Chazellechad, Nolan btfo
>Whiplash 4 stars
>La La Land 5 stars
>First Man 5 stars
Damien Chazelle praised Dunkirk and probably would like Oppenheimer
I don't even like Nolan much and Chazelle is shit compared to him
he gave a new MI 3.5. I don't trust him.
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
we're so fricking back
>experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation
It sounds terrible, just another gimmick that does not even fit the theme
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
that sounds fun. did this gay just want some boring daytime television recap of oppenheimers life?
I guess he's overexaggerating the drama with too much pacing.
>if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation
this is straight from the heart, and matches with problems Nolan typically has
>(Angry israelite noises)
Der David ist schon ein Guter
Definitiv. Ich finde seine Meinungen immer gut begründet und nachvollziehbar.
No one actually expects this to be good, look at the fricking premise, people are only talking about it cause it's nolan and the Barbie memes
>Watching a 3 hour slopfest biopic
ngmi
The irony in all this is plebs think Nolan is the saviour of kinema because he uses documentary cameras to film his flicks.
>omg muh 72mm muh high quality 8k omg look at that high definition
Barbie is soul.
OPenheimer is gay af.
Im watching it 3 nights this weekend with 3 different bawds.
>Im watching it 3 nights this weekend with 3 different bawds.
You mother, your grandmother and your sister?
So it's Tenet all over again.
He sounds like a midwit plotgay.
He never once mentioned plot
I agree with the reviewer. Dunkirk was the same. An over the top wall of sound over documentary looking shots of paper soldiers.
Nolan is finished.
When is the embargo up
19 July 2023 at 12pm ET.
Why does he think people want to be deafened by the fricking movies? The sound mixing turned tenet from a dumb flick to unenjoyable torture
Nolan is part of the hipster group that believes movies should be immersive
They should take over all your senses so you are overwhelmed by the experience.
That's why reddit adores him. It's escapism at its finest.
Should have stuck to capekino
Everything else he's made has been awful.
Interstellar was only decent because he stole everything from 2001.
After this flops he will come groveling back.
No capeshit again.
https://twitter.com/NolanAnalyst/status/1680670684995895296?s=20
that's what he says know.
Machine Man by Jack Kirby would be kino to adapt. Inspired by 2001: A Space Odyssey.
>declined to say if he will ever direct a Star Wars film
>didn’t say no
yeah, I’m thinking we’re back
>trusting a literal cuck
?
Sounds like a good time, if it was just a normal biopic I wouldn’t have bought a ticket
I should be posting this to Cinemaphile but I'll say it here anyways. I believe David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest to be a satire of overly intellectual works that seek to be deeper than they usually are. You see this in Rick and Morty, the very antithesis of sincerity. DFW was a fan of non stop action flicks that Cinemaphile would dismiss as goyslop. The whole point of films is the same as vidya: to entertain with an optional message on the side that you don't have to think much about. This is why I dislike most critics except for maybe Siskel and Ebert, they miss the obvious point of entertainment. It's nice to see fun movies with scenes of non stop action.
Yeah, thats why I watch Congo (1995) once a year... its fun
Honestly I think we're gonna fricking win. DFW literally and unironically, with explicit and unambiguous sincerity, was an early advocate of abandoning postmodernism because he believed it had far outstayed its welcome, was destroying society, and the cynicism it bled into pop culture was corrosive and tiresome at best. Increasingly, pop culture works aren't either conformant to postmodernism or ambivalent, if not just outright postmodern works, but instead are directly critical of postmodernism, using the pillars of postmodern thought as a foundation for the subversion of its conclusions and a return to sincerity. So not just a return to modernism like in the past, but a genuine post-postmodern framework. And a lot of people, even some people in opposition to wokeshit/progs, are deeply steeped in postmodern ideology itself and seethe like fricking maniacs when their ideological framework is embraced, coopted, and then used to thoroughly rebuke their nihilistic worldview and construct in some respects more potent meta-narratives than existed under modernism in massively popular media. The consequence is that there's an increasing amount of criticism generated towards media that has nothing to do with the work itself, nor has any staying or relevant meta-commentary, but is just immense seethe at the rejection of their previously uncritically accepted worldview in a manner they don't have the ability to critique.
The 1960s was the golden age of sincerity, I hope it returns. I can't explain the cynicism that emerged afterwards, but we need to go back to being apolitical. I just wanna grill for God's sake.
How many stars did he give Dunkirk?
dunkirk, interstellar, tenet 3
memento 4
bunch of crybabies in this thread, it's a fricking letterboxd review
Of a guy who said the same to his half a million youtube followers.
Nolan fans are very fragile, please have some patience
He's got some following.
https://www.youtube.com/@BeHaind/videos
I mean Nolan can write, we've seen it in Prestige... but if it's BROOOOOOOM kino, it only works with an exciting subject.
>I mean Nolan can write, we've seen it in Prestige
His brother co-wrote that
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
Yay! Lovin' every minute of it!
>Christopher Nolan has a warning for anyone purchasing “Oppenheimer” tickets: The film might emotionally destroy you.
>“Some people leave the movie absolutely devastated,” Nolan said about early screenings. “They can’t speak."
Why is Nolan like this?
I mean you wouldn't clap/cheer; just go back home without talking to anyone.
>they can't speak
Uh that's not a good thing Chris
>Nolan attends screening
>Movie ends
>People leave quietly
>"Don't you see? They are so emotionally devastated by my movie they cannot even speak! I really AM a genius!"
This gets spammed in entire thread:
>But if you've always wanted to experience a piece of contemporary history as a booming techno installation, you're in for a treat here.
Anon-IP counter remains the same
It's over. Looking like the biggest bomb since the silent era
>Muh world of atoms and molecules doesn't make sense
Movie is going to be frickin gay in one way or another. If this was made in 1990 it'd be a stately adult film about adults making adult choices, it'd have the prestige of a finely furnished Gentlemen's office. Now it's going to be stupid stylistic booming sounds and probably sweaty fricking in slow motions, I bet this is going to be one of those movies where you can see the main actor's butthole because "artists" thing "asses are the ultimate form of art". It's going to be gay in a gay way, anyone with half a brain can glance and tell.
>you can see the main actor's butthole because "artists" thing "asses are the ultimate form of art"
Barrie won.
the opinions of literal whos are not television or film