> Due to popular demand, “Oppenheimer” has extended its 70mm run at Imax theaters nationwide through the end of August.
But Cinemaphile told me there was no need to see it IMAX and normies were disappointed by it?
Oppenheimer Extends Imax 70mm Run Due to Popular Demand
Whats the point? They fricked up the only thing that mattered that was trinity, just a common explosion here, may as well watch in normal is just a drama afterall
I agree. I paid $8 for a standard showing. Glad I didn't fork out more for IMAX so I could spend 3 hours looking at people standing around and closups of faces staring blankly into space.
What's the greatest thing you've ever accomplished anon?
there is no reason to see it in imax, it was just wb and universal ganging up on paramount to make sure mission impossible didn’t have a chance of success against their shit meme movies
Kek, the explosion was rather accurate to the trinity test. You just have brainrot from watching too much H-bomb test. That aside, you homosexuals are also tastelets. A drama with no spectacle can be "epic" in terms of sense of scale and scope. How many of you have actually watched Citizen Kane or The Godfather in theaters?
Meds now. Oppenheimer had secured the release date before MI. How would oppenheimer "gang up" on something that wasn't even there in the first place?
Oppenheimer is not a visually pleasing movie. Hateful Eight looks beautiful even if I feel 65mm was somewhat wasted by the scope of that story. But Nolan's flick is a flat and piss green looking affair. Visually bland.
>But Nolan's flick is a flat and piss green looking affair.
Get your eyes checked if you think Oppenheimer looked "flat". Certain colors aren't popping like a Tarantino flick but that's not the same as looking flat.
Flat as in lighting. The movie has SHIT LIGHTING AND SHIT COLOR GRADING
You sound like one of those guys who learnt about color grading and lighting from youtubers. You think anything that isn't ostentatious is poorly lit.
You sound butthurt. I'm firmly opposed to the lazy and hackneyed digital color grading that's continued to degrade cinema for the past two decades. We have various flavors of your blue, green and yellow piss filters that are inexplicably applied to major releases without benefiting the beauty of the natural colors caught in the camera. I can only assume that the colorists are conspiring to maintain illusions that their work is very much indispensable. But if you enjoy the piss filter then piss away. We've already seen previews of Ridley Scott's next great epic disaster. The fricking yellow desert. The blue tinted horseback riding. It's more of the same and I expect nothing less from him. This is a man who managed to suck the color out of House of Gucci because otherwise we might accidentally notice the fashion. And then there's Denis' fabled followup with more smeared shades of dull beige. Did you watch Northman by chance? Another piss filtered affair! These colorists are a menace.
>But if you enjoy the piss filter then piss away. We've already seen previews of Ridley Scott's next great epic disaster. The fricking yellow desert.
You're absolutely right anon. The evil piss filter in both Oppenheimer and Napoleon! Exactly the same.
it was definitely more visual appealing and exciting than Hateful 8 what a trash Tarantino that was, at least say Once Upon a time in Hollywood
I'm referring to the color specifically. H8 had much better color grading and the lighting was on point.
Hateful eight exposed some limitations of Richardson's "style". That pure white light raining down on the characters while they're inside a cabin in the 1800s during the night where it should be impossible makes it look unnatural during certain scenes. Doesn't help the entire movie takes place inside the cabin.
Oh no the movie prioritized visuals over realism! I can't believe this would happen in a movie. Maybe that's part of why so much of today's media looks like dark dog shit
You're a hypocrite. For color grading you emphasize naturalism and capturing natural colors
> We have various flavors of your blue, green and yellow piss filters that are inexplicably applied to major releases without benefiting the beauty of the natural colors caught in the camera.
But for lighting. Capturing natural authentic lighting is le bad. Your comments just reinforce that your knowledge is half baked.
Nolangay detected
oppenheimer in imax was an amazing experience even better than Avatar 2 in imax 3d
Lol I can't imagine anyone who'd pay to see this boring trash.
That's because you're a shut in NEET who can't imagine what being normal is like.
There are also 70mm showings without IMAX. The film projector noise at the back of the theater drowned out the quiet scenes and there was even an authentic multifolicular hair wiggling in the corner of the screen. Couldn't tell at first if it was added to the movie itself since all the early scenes looked like an old film documentary in style but it became apparent it was the actual projector that got a fuzzball trapped in the works.
Im glad this movie is exposing that majority of theaters don't have real IMAX, its just overpriced "Lie-Max"
True. The shitty IMAX website refused to load when I contemplated looking for a 70mm showing.
I am convinced that this IMAX bull and the soundtrack nonsense is all studio meddling.
It is 🙂
And you can't do shit about it, you jobless manlet pussy ass homosexual 🙂
I am going to pirate the shit out of it. Maybe even wait for the dialogue only fan cut.
It's marketing.
You misunderstood. I want lighting that delivers dynamic images on screen which enhance the natural beauty of the color when tastefully color graded. What we have typically these days is a hackneyed attempt at "realism" which does not deliver dynamic images and then it's further shat on with a layer of tinted color usually blue or green. Woweezowee. Seems pretty straight forward to me
>I want lighting that delivers dynamic images on screen which enhance the natural beauty of the color when tastefully color graded.
You're basically saying you want a style which makes sure the colors pop as they would in the best possible lighting. But the reality is under different lights, different day times colors won't pop the same way they would under the best possible lighting. Who's to say actual naturalism can't be beautiful or create striking imagery?
> What we have typically these days is a hackneyed attempt at "realism" which does not deliver dynamic images .
If you think Oppenheimer is graded or lit the same as say Extraction or The Northman then you have no idea what you're talking about. But then again people who indulge in these gross generalizations rarely do. If the Godfather came out today you'd be complaining about it having a yellow piss filter or The Matrix having a green filter.
>If you think Oppenheimer is graded or lit the same as say Extraction or The Northman
They are both graded in the same manner using digital tool sets according to industry standards. And the lighting will always vary but it's really hard to tell key differences at times when the entire image is obfuscated by a terrible green tint.
>The Matrix having a green filter
It quite literally had a revisionist green filter applied to it for home media releases to coincide with the green tint the wackjobskees decided necessary for the aesthetic of the sequels because uh... muh simulation. Go take a look at Mann's revisionist blueberry treatment of his director approved Thief restoration while you're at it big guy. Just more unnecessary tinkering for the sake of it
>It quite literally had a revisionist green filter applied to it for home media releases to coincide with the green tint the wackjobskees decided necessary for the aesthetic of the sequels because uh... muh simulation.
Nope. This is why limited knowledge is a bad a thing. The original had a green tint for a lot of scenes which then got over corrected in early dvd releases which then got over corrected in the opposite direction to give it a heavy green tint.
The original looked nothing like the revisionist DVD color grading. The gradings were entirely different. Your pretense of expanded knowledge is comical. Is this your grand gotcha? The original colorist worked on the UHD release to closely match the theatrical release. There are 35mm scans albeit with blown out whites which you can download right now and compare for yourself. The unmolested versions of the Matrix look pretty good overall.
>The original looked nothing like the revisionist DVD color grading. The gradings were entirely different.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying as well you literal dumbfrick. Do you have reading comprehension issues? The green tint was almost entirely removed in some of the early releases which lead some of the morons to think that it never there in the first place. Then the Blu-ray release over corrected with a heavy green tint using the sequels for reference.
To put in a simple.
1) Original green tint but not too heavy
2) Early DvD releases green tint removed
3) Blu-Ray heavy green tint to match the sequels
4) The remaster is closer to the original.
You stupid little shit. The theatrical run is scanned ready for you to view. A copy of an original 35mm scan played in theaters in 1999 here in the now. Your precious green tint is not on the level you describe. Hopefully you understand this better you pretentious idiot.
>You stupid little shit. The theatrical run is scanned ready for you to view. A copy of an original 35mm scan played in theaters in 1999 here in the now.
I know and I've seen. The green tint isn't non-existent, it's there. Just not at the level in the later releases which is what I originally said as well.
> Your precious green tint is not on the level you describe.
lol, you admit it has the green tint. Just not the level I describe? You disingenuous twat. This is what I said
.You're just dumbfrick who failed to read properly and has shit eyes to boot. It's also why I posted a screengrab with the 4K remaster which involved the people who worked on the film to get it closer to the original release.
Kek. It's like watching glen gary glen ross in 70mm. I guess with the state of us education they may be able to bilk more people into spending more to see it.
Aren't there only like nineteen IMAX 70mm screens in the US? I mean 99,99999% of people will never see the movie that way and they don't give a frick either, no matter how much Nolan creams himself over "muh gigantic film stock"
IMAX is a brand. They will slap their logo on anything that pays enough for the license. It's 90% pure marketing bullshit.
Remember the cruise homosexuals saying MI would get it's IMAX screens back after Oppenheimer bombs? I remember
This cope was so sad, what's more pathetic is even even Opp's first week some were still saying MI would get its screen back... why?
Oppenheimer has ruined my mind to the point where I can no longer consume any media without feelings its immediate inferiority. It makes me want to run on a screaming rampage, tearing down the vain works of man that line our halls and museums--all merely flickering shadows cast on a cave's wall in the light of Oppenheimer.
Michelangelo, Da Vinci, Van Gogh, Shakespeare... What you call artists, I would call merely the road-builders, the forebearers... They established the traditions that Oppenheimer would one day perfect.
Art is dead, expression is finished, as it has, in a way, completed its original purpose.
We are done, and now we may retire as a single, post-enlightenment culture.