crazy how no one even disputes this. the UK has just been completely handed over to indians and pakis. for as much shit as america gets for being muttified, at least we havnt just been completely
overtaken by some single ethnicity. meanwhile in the UK, their cities are just 60% indian its insane
Yeah, it was the most boring and uninspired piece of slop of all the Yidsney live action remakes. The bar was already low but it managed to dig even deeper.
Hypothetical: you're savagely but tenderly making love to Ever and you accidentally call her by her mother's name. Does she A) get mad and storm out or B) re-double her efforts in an attempt to essentially "out-frick" the fantasy of her mother you hold in your mind?
Both Peter Pan and Wendy are supposed to be roughly the same age physically. Which makes that movies casting even worse beyond the race ending
The narrative theme is that Peter rejects growing up, is tempted by his feelings for Wendy and the prospects of romance in general but knows it’s something reserved for the grownup world he does not wish to be part of/is not ready for
Wendy meanwhile does want this, hence why she chooses to go home and has a happy marriage with kids and gets to be a mother later. While still having fond memories of Peter and the adventures in neverland
Also they share similar burdens but with completely different ideas on how to handle it.
Wendy is much more mature than her age because she effectively has to help raise her two younger brothers. And later does similar for the lost boys
Peter “leads” the lost brothers but doesn’t really order them around. They’re a band of loose comrades. He isn’t their “leader”. He eschews responsibility.
I think pic related, the 2003 film had the best cast by far.
So canonically, Peter Pan is about Wendy riding the wiener carousel and then settling down later?
The message of the source material is the exact opposite. Peter Pan serves as the sexual/romantic awakening for literally every girl that comes across him, but he is so reckless, chaotic, bloodthirsty and immature they all eventually give up on him. He's such a piece of shit he later on kidnaps Wendy's daughter out of spite.
Tinkerbell dies a year after Wendy left Neverland, and he completely forgot about her.
He is NOT supposed to be the good guy. In D&D terms, he's exactly what a Chaotic Neutral character is.
As to the "bloodthirsty" aspect - during a battle between the Lost Boys and the Pirates, he keeps switching sides and killing the other party to make it "less boring."
Not only are you a moron, your comparison is wrong. Peter Pan would be a spergy manchild in the body of a Chad who is too stupid to realise women want to frick him.
Not only are you a moron, your comparison is wrong. Peter Pan would be a spergy manchild in the body of a Chad who is too stupid to realise women want to frick him.
Lots of the source material for Disney movies is really compelling and still holds up today. Kipling’s Jungle Book, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Treasure Island, Tarzan, Oliver Twist, etc. All pretty distinct from their adaptations. The Jungle Book in particular got totally flipped around; Bagheera was the easygoing of Mowgli’s 3 non-wolf mentors, Baloo was more strict, and Kaa was ann old wiseman type figure. Really love the original version of Shere Khan too. A lot of Kipling’s depictions of wildlife feel ahead of their time.
As to the "bloodthirsty" aspect - during a battle between the Lost Boys and the Pirates, he keeps switching sides and killing the other party to make it "less boring."
Her parents, who have been in film for decades, should have known better than to cast her in race washed gender bent slop. Killed her career before it began.
Her mom just starred in some liberal ass anti-white film starring (checks notes) Jennifer Hudson? Whose claim to fame was being on American Idol 20 years ago.
>I don’t ever blame actors.
Actors need accountability for the roles they choose.
So what if Ever got a Disney paycheck. If it ruined her career, she loses out on 15+ years of multiple paychecks because she starred in a flop and no one will cast her.
This anon's right, actors are a brand and will actively avoid specific roles like playing a creep or rapist and the bigger you get the more you can demand, entire careers are made on how your characters are perceived.
>It’s a job >hire arquitect to design a house >look like shit >it's a job the money is good what can you do it is what it is it's a gig it's for exposure so he can make more houses it's his first house
>It’s a job, she probably made good money from it
Sure but there's a balance between cashing out once and earning a bit less in a different projects but getting to continue being cast in movies.
It was Anderson's movie wasn't it? They likely did it for the Blackrock Bucks.
Milla's a classic ukrainian prostitute archetype. It's the family business to sell your flesh to the highest bidder.
>It was Anderson's movie wasn't it?
No, Anderson has nothing to do with Peter Pan.
He cast Ever as the young version of Alice (Milla) in Resident Evil 6, though.
>Anderson has nothing to do with Peter Pan
Not neccesarily. He most likely worked with the studio or producers, saying "You put my kid in this film and I'll cut you a financial break on future films we do together. And you get to frick Ever. Win win, right!"
Hollywood is just a bunch of shady deals and secret handshakes.
>and I'll cut you a financial break on future films we do together
> Paul W S Anderson with his Impact Pictures, which is just a small cut above B-movie houses like Millennium > somehow having something that he can offer Disney in negotiations
LMAO. Disney is so mismanaged from top to bottom. Then again, if I was in the toy department, would I advise Disney not to make this shit nobody wants? I'd be out of a job.
Casting a nig as thinkerbell which made it impossible to use fairy dust style shit, because it clashed too much with the nig skin
100% real and that's why there's no more fairy dust and all scenes with tinkerbell are dark as frick
They just couldn't light the nig skin properly to make her "magical"
The fricking racism writes fricking itself
Why is Peter Pan Indian?
wait till you see tinker bell
Cute
do they know that atractive black women exist?
More like Stringer Bell
She's actually rather pretty irl, it's just, they intentionally go out of their way to make shit ugly.
really? whats her name?
peter pan syndrome is about narcissism. those tiny bobbleheaded Black folk are all narcissists.
>BAN CANADA
god I wish
Is that what Bruno Mars is up to these days?
>ban Canada
>do not
Redeem
Because majority of UK population is now indian. Even their leaders are indian.
crazy how no one even disputes this. the UK has just been completely handed over to indians and pakis. for as much shit as america gets for being muttified, at least we havnt just been completely
overtaken by some single ethnicity. meanwhile in the UK, their cities are just 60% indian its insane
Pure british lad
Because diversity means blanda upp until there is only one vaguely tanned race that does nothing but consume goyslop and watch yidtok
Everything made by Disney is so ugly now.
Peter Paneer, innit
Ur racist saar
Why were some of the Lost Boys girls?
because the writers are idiots that hadn't read the original story.
“Girls are much too clever to fall out of their prams”
No one wants to look at pajeets.
The green shirt accentuates his pencil neck making him look like a turtle.
Thats Filbur from Rockos Modern Life!
Did anyone watch it?
Yeah, it was the most boring and uninspired piece of slop of all the Yidsney live action remakes. The bar was already low but it managed to dig even deeper.
Who owns Disney again?
manlet peter poo
Why is he geeking
Sex and drugs
Heres ur wendy bro
Why is she making this face at age 15?
She saw Daisy Ridley do it.
Everyone is disgusted by Indian men, nobody wants to pay money to have to see one
Her dad is French. I don’t think further elaboration is required.
Her dad is British, Paul W S Anderson. You might be seriously out of the loop on Milla's marriages.
Desi chads are colonizing the west.
Consensual rapings is in order.
Hypothetical: you're savagely but tenderly making love to Ever and you accidentally call her by her mother's name. Does she A) get mad and storm out or B) re-double her efforts in an attempt to essentially "out-frick" the fantasy of her mother you hold in your mind?
I just don't realistically see myself ever being in that situation
OK well what if you imagined me in that situation instead
>Hypothetical
>realistically
dumbass
She is a pedophile
Like mother, like daughter
would
Why is that mf eyes so big
Damn lol he's a year older than her but looks like 4 years younger, puberty is a b***h
Because no one watched it for any reason whatsoever except for she.
I'm going to impregnate Ever Anderson.
pajeeter pan
Both Peter Pan and Wendy are supposed to be roughly the same age physically. Which makes that movies casting even worse beyond the race ending
The narrative theme is that Peter rejects growing up, is tempted by his feelings for Wendy and the prospects of romance in general but knows it’s something reserved for the grownup world he does not wish to be part of/is not ready for
Wendy meanwhile does want this, hence why she chooses to go home and has a happy marriage with kids and gets to be a mother later. While still having fond memories of Peter and the adventures in neverland
Also they share similar burdens but with completely different ideas on how to handle it.
Wendy is much more mature than her age because she effectively has to help raise her two younger brothers. And later does similar for the lost boys
Peter “leads” the lost brothers but doesn’t really order them around. They’re a band of loose comrades. He isn’t their “leader”. He eschews responsibility.
I think pic related, the 2003 film had the best cast by far.
So canonically, Peter Pan is about Wendy riding the wiener carousel and then settling down later?
Yes. And still getting dicked by Chad occasionally.
The message of the source material is the exact opposite. Peter Pan serves as the sexual/romantic awakening for literally every girl that comes across him, but he is so reckless, chaotic, bloodthirsty and immature they all eventually give up on him. He's such a piece of shit he later on kidnaps Wendy's daughter out of spite.
Tinkerbell dies a year after Wendy left Neverland, and he completely forgot about her.
He is NOT supposed to be the good guy. In D&D terms, he's exactly what a Chaotic Neutral character is.
As to the "bloodthirsty" aspect - during a battle between the Lost Boys and the Pirates, he keeps switching sides and killing the other party to make it "less boring."
>>He is NOT supposed to be the good guy.
Neither are Chads your waifu keeps fricking?
Not only are you a moron, your comparison is wrong. Peter Pan would be a spergy manchild in the body of a Chad who is too stupid to realise women want to frick him.
Interesting stuff tbh.
Lots of the source material for Disney movies is really compelling and still holds up today. Kipling’s Jungle Book, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Treasure Island, Tarzan, Oliver Twist, etc. All pretty distinct from their adaptations. The Jungle Book in particular got totally flipped around; Bagheera was the easygoing of Mowgli’s 3 non-wolf mentors, Baloo was more strict, and Kaa was ann old wiseman type figure. Really love the original version of Shere Khan too. A lot of Kipling’s depictions of wildlife feel ahead of their time.
live action "TaleSpin" when?
F
So was that whole book a failed attempt to make little girls not chase Steves in later life?
Remember when a Cinemaphilener became Peter Pan irl? I remember
I vaguely remember this guy. I think he was famous on the internet in 2001. He predates Cinemaphile.
He was truly a beautiful soul. One of the real ones
He burned so local his picture was on the wall at the fire station
Ever is 16 years old. I want to cum in her tight teenage pussy.
Ever is 16 years old. I want to cum in her tight teenage pussy.
Ugly characters.
if this is a real movie its the first ive heard of it
is it real? is it already out? does dinsey even advertise anymore?
Her parents, who have been in film for decades, should have known better than to cast her in race washed gender bent slop. Killed her career before it began.
Idiots.
Her mom just starred in some liberal ass anti-white film starring (checks notes) Jennifer Hudson? Whose claim to fame was being on American Idol 20 years ago.
I think Ever needs a new agent/mother.
I don’t ever blame actors. It’s a job, she probably made good money from it, that’s as far as they are going to / need to consider.
>I don’t ever blame actors.
Actors need accountability for the roles they choose.
So what if Ever got a Disney paycheck. If it ruined her career, she loses out on 15+ years of multiple paychecks because she starred in a flop and no one will cast her.
This anon's right, actors are a brand and will actively avoid specific roles like playing a creep or rapist and the bigger you get the more you can demand, entire careers are made on how your characters are perceived.
What if I want to cast Jason Statham as a timid polite sidekick to a confident and badass female lead character?
>It’s a job
>hire arquitect to design a house
>look like shit
>it's a job the money is good what can you do it is what it is it's a gig it's for exposure so he can make more houses it's his first house
>It’s a job, she probably made good money from it
Sure but there's a balance between cashing out once and earning a bit less in a different projects but getting to continue being cast in movies.
It was Anderson's movie wasn't it? They likely did it for the Blackrock Bucks.
Milla's a classic ukrainian prostitute archetype. It's the family business to sell your flesh to the highest bidder.
>It was Anderson's movie wasn't it?
No, Anderson has nothing to do with Peter Pan.
He cast Ever as the young version of Alice (Milla) in Resident Evil 6, though.
>Anderson has nothing to do with Peter Pan
Not neccesarily. He most likely worked with the studio or producers, saying "You put my kid in this film and I'll cut you a financial break on future films we do together. And you get to frick Ever. Win win, right!"
Hollywood is just a bunch of shady deals and secret handshakes.
>and I'll cut you a financial break on future films we do together
> Paul W S Anderson with his Impact Pictures, which is just a small cut above B-movie houses like Millennium
> somehow having something that he can offer Disney in negotiations
>ayy lmao looking pajeet
>manface jovovich cumbawd
Idk maybe people dont like to look at ugly things and pay for that?
>peter pan & wendy
let me guess her name is in the title because of muh female representation
To be fair, she and the narrator are the actual main characters of the stories. Peter Pan is more akin to a secondary character that drives the plot.
oh interesting, i didnt know that
More like Pajeeter Pan
heh
Ever was not nude the entire runtime
They made a Lego set for this piece of shit that went on clearance a few weeks after it was stocked.
LMAO. Disney is so mismanaged from top to bottom. Then again, if I was in the toy department, would I advise Disney not to make this shit nobody wants? I'd be out of a job.
Because they're both ugly, duh.
It never got released in theaters. They just dumped it on streaming cuz they finally realized making PP a Pajeet was a terrible mistake.
Casting a nig as thinkerbell which made it impossible to use fairy dust style shit, because it clashed too much with the nig skin
100% real and that's why there's no more fairy dust and all scenes with tinkerbell are dark as frick
They just couldn't light the nig skin properly to make her "magical"
The fricking racism writes fricking itself
PAHJEETAW!!?
Not even leftist moronic women from mumsnet took their kids to see nog pan
Aside from the race swap it was shit anyways