Please explain to me

Why would they debase the HBO brand by removing HBO from the streaming name, and adding tons and tons of low grade reality TV to HBO - once considered the cable channel known for high quality?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The real answer is probably they're aiming to launch more than one streaming service down the line and they can't both be named HBO is my guess

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It would make sense if the Reality And lowbrow shows from Discovery were only available on streaming Max, but it’s also on my cable. just because it bounces over to Max doesn’t insulate HBO from the Discovery crap - if I went to HBO to find it.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      But there's already Discovery+.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      they already had discovery+ and hbo now. they could've kept 3 streaming services if they wanted to.

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not only that, they’ve made it harder to find higher quality HBO documentaries, now buried in an ocean of lowbrow Discovery shit.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      you are literally moronic. theres is an HBO tab with everything HBO

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Im thinking of the experience from watching a TV - I use Comcast Xfinity and the content is organized differently. More of a jumble. Maybe that’s a Comcast issue - but you would think HBO would have control over how the content is organized there.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    HBO is known for breasts and ass shows not for high quality.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      thats Showtime

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        HBO, Showtime and Starz.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. Nudity and cancelling shows half way. That's what i think of when i think of HBO

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's known for virtue signaling and padding their ESG score now.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    they know they're never going to make anything as good as sopranos, rome, or even "the night of" again, so they don't want their new slop to be associated with expectations of the older stuff.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      *laughs in Succession*

      Just frick off

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        succession was shit. brian cox carried the show on his back, but even he couldn't do much with the shit writing.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >succession was shit
          No

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          capeshitter detected

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Succession had high production quality, (expensive) and Cox was very entertaining to watch as the character of Logan Roy.
          Not a great show per se - but they poured some money into and it looked good.

          Now I turn to Amazon Prime and they have this Freevee crap - movies with ads. But the whole point of cable and streaming is you are paying a monthly fee - to avoid advertisements

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            production values can't hide bad writing

            also digital cameras held by parkinson's patients mean those values were wasted

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I picked up the $3 Black Friday deal and seeing the commercials forcibly jammed into HBO shows (distinctly not structured for ad breaks) pisses me off to no end

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    HBO as a brand hasn't been relevant since GoT ended. The reality slop is what's hot. In reality Discovery really fricked up taking on the rotting carcass of Time Warner when TLC, Home and Garden, and the cooking channel printed money.

    You can give some bimbo a camecorder and tell her to make a reality show for 50k and episode or drop 200m making the magic Black person comic book movie that will both have the same amount of viewers.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Discovery/TLC stuff is actually more profitable than HBO ever was. That apparently means more to them than history, prestige, quality, legacy, etc when choosing a name. I could see how they thought it would be smart to call it something new Featuring HBO but It's like if someone bought NISSAN and Ferrari and called their new company NISSAN+. Its almost mind boggling how HBO-Max was the best streaming service there for a while and now it's seen as the fart store.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      All the old stuff is there. There's nothing wrong with more content imo. HBO Max became irrelevant when they stopped moving their theatrical releases to there 30 days after their debut. Barbie still isn't on there. Even irrelevant shit nobody sees like the blue beetle takes 6 months to go there at which point nobody cares because it's just a shitty six month old movie nobody wanted or wants to see.

      The Discovery stuff is the only thing keeping it relevant. I get it for free sharing a relatives account and only use it to watch cut throat kitchen and ID Discovery shows.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just picture every executive decision being taken while doing massive amounts of coke and all will make sense.

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't associate 35 distinct 90 Day Fiance series with quality?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >HBO is a flag ship brand denoting quality entertainment
      >Has to sell to a reality tv company because failing do to years of slop slopping
      Hmm

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >HBO
    > known for high quality
    When?

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    That long stint right after GoT ended where they produced the sloppiest trash imaginable that caused them to have to sell to avoid bankruptcy hasn’t ended yet
    Bro

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    they are essentially transforming in the same way the history channel did

    I dub it "the history channel effect"

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Once like 20 years ago
    Times change gramps

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The removed HBO from the branding so that when the service eventually goes under it won't damage the cable/satellite product too much. The change was actually made to protect the HBO name.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now that actually makes some sense.
      But who starts up a streaming service with the expectation it will fail?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Everyone. Streaming services don't actually make any money and cost millions a day to operate. I suppose in the business sense the streaming service can give you an idea about what your customers really spend their time watching, but how valuable that is when you're just pumping out propaganda with a total disregard for profit is pretty questionable.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now that actually makes some sense.
      But who starts up a streaming service with the expectation it will fail?

      Are you guys moronic? If HBO Max can't get traction for $9.99 with their entire library at your fingertips who the frick is going to pay even more for some legacy cable add on.

  15. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >get rid of their best kino, West World
    >generic dumb name like max
    it's over

  16. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pull up Max's homepage right now and you'll get your answer. 7 of the top 10 most watched shows this week are unscripted slop from the discovery side. 2 of them are "Max Originals". Only 1 show pulling in ratings is an actual HBO show.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      that shit's fake

  17. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    HBO is associated with being expensive to normies. Zaslav doesn’t want that.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *