Post your reaction when it outgrosses Solo
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Post your reaction when it outgrosses Solo
Post your reaction when it outgrosses Solo
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
you wouldn't steal a car, would you?
>25th anniversary
>This movie is now three years older than A New Hope was when it came out
>This movie is now three years older than A New Hope was when it came out
No! That’s not true! THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE!
>It’s true
Holy shit I’m on a crash course for old folks home
>Luke Skywalker is now in his 70's
>still hasn't had sex
In the UK, it's been raised by film classifiers from a Universal to a PG due to violence
>Universal to a PG
Recently or something? From what I remember it was, at least on DVD, always PG.
This last week. Apparently it's been raised for the cinema.
Here it is...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13287655/star-wars-pg-film-film-classifiers-violence.html
Empire & Jedi have also been raised to PG.
Sith will probably be a 15 now.
The DVD was probably pic related. The bonus disc probably accounts for the PG rating.
Isn't Episode 3 PG-13? Above all what can be shown with the various PG?
>I conflate American ratings with UK ratings regularly
>t. idiot that lacks reading comprehension
I think you might confusing US and UK ratings
Still got the poster from that somewhere
It got PG-13 in America and 12 in Britain - in both case on account of Anakin burning.
>12 in Britain
I think technically it would have got a 12A for cinema and 12 on DVD release.
Do we agree with this
TPM, ESB, RTJ = PG
>May contain mild language (frequent/aggressive use may result in the work being passed at a higher category) or sex/drug references. May contain moderate violence if justified by context (e.g. fantasy). Unaccompanied children of any age may watch, but parents are advised to consider whether the content may upset younger, or more sensitive, children.[54]
ROTS becoming 15
>May have fairly mature themes. May contain (frequent) strong language, strong violence, strong sex references, nudity without graphic detail and hard drugs. Sexual activity may be portrayed but without any strong detail. Sexual violence may be shown if discreet and justified by context. Use of very strong language may be permitted based on frequency and how it is used, as well as contextual justification.[56]
>May contain moderate violence
So you can show severed limbs in PG
Is film reclassification common (in the UK or anywhere) or is this just due to the release?
They've been redoing the ratings for certain films like James Bond because in Goldfinger he assaults & rapes Pussy Galore.
Also, this is why having the original proper cuts of films on disc, is now important.
They've starting doing warnings on stuff because of out dated language.
It's ridiculous
Surprised it wasn't always a PG, since it has somebody getting cut in half.
It's only a split second though.
Sith will be raised in rating, because of the Skywalker barbeque scene
this is the only good thing disney has done with star wars. nice.
KORAH MATAH
KORAH RAHTAHMAH
RIP my wallet
nice vessels
wtf?! where’s the anus?
With literally some changes it would have been loved by audiences.
Qui Gin si already Obiwan.
Obiwan is Anakin.
The relationship between Anakin and the queen is no longer ridiculous.
No Tatooine, if everything happened between Naboo and Coruscant it would have been better.
Maul replaces Sidious in all scenes and begins hunting the Jedi like Death in Last Wish,and it is a real threat.
Anakin sacrifices an arm, but defeats Maul and becomes a Jedi.
The whole chosen one Anakin was stupid and shouldn't have been there. Episode 1 is well paced, just needed to make the stakes higher and not have a kid around.
>With literally some changes it would have been loved by audiences.
good thing you're a random nobody shitter moron on the internet and not george lucas.
So lazy.
>No Tatooine
Dropped.
>some changes
>makes it a completely different movie
Actually no. The tatooine was in fact a filler in the main plot, a detour they had to make that only serves to find Anakin. That screen time could have been used to give more depth to Naboo which for once doesn't have a single city. The Race could have been something that was done on Naboo too.
>Actually no. The tatooine was in fact a filler in the main plot, a detour they had to make that only serves to find Anakin. That screen time could have been used to give more depth to Naboo which for once doesn't have a single city. The Race could have been something that was done on Naboo too.
yes, the whole movie about the rise of a galactic empire should take place on a single planet or as few as planets as possible. it makes no narrative or aesthetic sense to maximize the number of planets showcased to demonstrate the width and berth of the galactic scale of the story or anything. showing tattoonine as lawless and fringe. we didnt need the whole narrative explaining where anakin's pain that leads to him becoming darth vader came from. it would have been much better if it all happened off screen, like in disney nu wars kylo ren!!!! also remember how cool it was when we just meet Rey and she just somehow lives alone by herself but is also good at everything like swimming and flying space ships and stuff. much better than if they had given either of the two main characters any depth or character development!!!!
seeing darth vader as a 'cute innocent little kid' who loves his mom and loves helping strangers was entirely the point. if the character just started off as an angsty spoiled teenage jedi knight the character would have been a failure - again like kylo ren. child anakin was absolutely essential to what the story as george lucas wanted to tell it.
>seeing darth vader as a 'cute innocent little kid' who loves his mom and loves helping strangers was entirely the point.
I didn't need or desire to see anything like that about Darth Vader.
Sounds like a personal problem.
Not everything needs to have its backstory explored in depth. I know that using one's imagination is a strange concept, however.
>Not everything needs to have its backstory explored in depth.
bro, its a PREQUEL. aka THE BACKSTORY to the previous story. anakin's story is literally the story of the prequels. its the entire premise of their whole story. without anakin's backstory there is no star wars prequel story. are you dense? what else would it have been about?
It could have not existed at all, which would have been preferable. The throwaway line about the "Clone Wars" in the original film was more interesting and evocative than anything in the prequels.
>It could have not existed at all, which would have been preferable
good argument bro. a prequel story shouldnt have backstory and/or shouldn't exist at all. good contribution to the conversation, retart.
Creating an interesting world and doing less with it, and allowing the viewer to utilize their own imagination and sense of wonder to think about it, is better than filling in every scrap of "lore" and inevitably ruining it.
>filling in every scrap of "lore" and inevitably ruining it
Like the EU?
>Implying I have any interesting in that or need to defend it
The whole narrative point was just to show how pure Anakin was. The same could have been done by showing him as a good, naive and absolutely honorable young Jedi Knight like Steve Rogers.
The Kid was a choice by Lucas because he wanted to direct the film to children, and it is not excluded that it was initially older given the age difference with the queen which makes everything morbid and creepy.
star wars has always been for children.
Probably, not everyone here are a pedophile like you.
The frick?
>Qui Gin si already Obiwan.
>Obiwan is Anakin.
based moron
The best part of the prequels was Palpatine finagling his way to the top. A series focused on Coruscant intrigue with a just a dash of forcegayging and lightsabers would be kino.
You can still have that. But the instead of having the hooded guy you just have Maul acting as a proxy.
India moment
strongly considering going to the kinoplex for this
can't wait for the half in the bag
I just booked my tickets btw
>The phrase "a communications disruption could mean only one thing" is a quote from the character Darth Maul in the movie "Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace." In the context of the movie, Darth Maul's statement implies that a communications disruption could signal the presence of an enemy or a threat.
>However, in reality, a communications disruption could have various causes, such as technical issues, natural disasters, or deliberate interference. So, while a communications disruption might indicate a problem, it doesn't necessarily mean there's only one possible explanation.
There you go.
>Call the old actor just for 20 seconds on blue screen
Thanks, now can you tell me some jokes about black people?
Frick Disney.
The prequels are shit and always will be. Redlettermedia was right about everything.
>Red Letter Media
>Redlettermedia
I could not care less if you hate the prequels, like the boomers in the early 2000s who were butthurt George didn’t just remake the OT and somehow knew better than Star wars’ creator. Your image is clearly bait though because the sequels are irredeemable garbage.
>who were butthurt George didn’t just remake the OT and somehow knew better than Star wars’ creator
people were butthurt because he made three dogshit movies
You are free to think they are dogshit. Calling them dogshit while propping up Disney cancer on the other hand shows that you are either a blatant liar or a homosexual democrat
>Calling them dogshit while propping up Disney
Don't care for the disney films and never stated i did, very funny for you to bring them up in reflex. Why don't you just go leave since this is clearly just all part of some political culturwar battle?
Did you see the chain of replies you were posting on you fricking nitwit? Tryhard reddit tourist.
>Your image is clearly bait though because the sequels are irredeemable garbage
The prequels are considered just as bad though
>Redditlettermedia
They loved The Last Jedi, who fricking cares what they think
Simple and accurate with maximum precision.
You mean the guys that loved Obi Wan? kek, they have zero taste.
>why make new when can release old?!
brava yidsney
I'd go see it if it was the theatrical cut projected on 35mm
Can't wait to see this creature's thick ass on the big screen in HD and hear it's luscious fart in full Dolby Surround Sound. I'll take a big whiff with Jar Jar.
that's a terrible poster, why not just use the Drew Struzan one
>that's a terrible poster, why not just use the Drew Struzan one
because they wanted to make new posters so they stand out as 'oh wow whats this? something from star wars episode 1 that i havent seen? is it new?' its to get your attention. if this ad just used an old poster from the original release of the phantom menace many people might just scroll past it. new posters draw eyes.
Re-releases always get new posters, morons.
Saw this in theaters with my friends and roommates, and was excited for 5 more years of 3d theatrical releases. Then Disney bought it out and it was done. Scumbags
You now remember this go released in 3D, with the plans to release the other prequels & the OT in 3D got scrapped with the Disney purchase.
yeah i went to that simply because I wanted to see TPM in theatres again
If lightsaber blades have inertia, do they push backwards as the blade extends?
I dunno I have never bothered with starslop
And yet, you are here
Why not, it's my downtime and I like to chat.
>Why not, it's my downtime and I like to chat.
Why do you feel anyone ITT is going to engage with someone who doesn't have anything to say about the thread topic?
>returns to theaters
why
to theaters
>why
because disney needs some star wars money and nothing they made is pulling in viewers so they are going to re-release the only star wars content that was popular in the last 30 years. its not rocket science.
Trump looking good
I'll drop a can of beans on the floor of my shack.
TPM is a shitty Star Wars film, but a GREAT stand-alone children's film. I just watched it again for the first time in about 15 years since I loathe it, but viewed it as a fan-film this time. It should be on a tier with other 80's kid classics like Neverending Storie and Goonies if it wasn't tied to the SW franchise.
Aside from the bad writing, bad plotting, stupid deus ex machina things happen because Reasons bullshit, what really kills it is the over-the-top slapstick bullshit. George Lucas is the only man on the planet to make a performance by Brian Blessed cringe-worthy.
25th anniversary of The Phantom Menace.
42nd anniversary of Natalie Portman being a Hershlag. Frickin lying b***h. I'd do her.
Why hasn't George given the prequels the special edition treatment? I feel people would react positively since they already use CGI.
because they are already special
Most newer releases have previously deleted scenes inserted. Also, probably because Lucas never felt like he was restricted while making the prequels.
He already replaced puppet Yoda
episode 1 did with replacing puppet yoda and some effects
I hate to be that guy, but I will watch this high
Honestly, worth it just to hear Duel of the Fates in glorious 23.1 sound