>should this person I don't like, and actively berate, capitulate to my unreasonable demands despite having absolutely no reason to do so and motivation to do the contrary?
what the frick kind of moron thinks this way
I mean it's like why put it in a question when you know the answer is no? It's obviously an opinion piece so why not switch "JK Rowling" and "should" around and drop the fricking question mark instead of being a fricking moron about it?
>No sir, there's no time to be blue! >Change is coming and we're going to need you! >So pick up your stein and sing a happy song. >Hitler's heroes are here to right the wrongs!
There are a lot of people would who love to own Harry Potter's IP rights, they would milk the shit out of it like Disney did with Star Wars, but they know Rowling is very much attached to it.
So they're trying to move the Overton window, of course that article is absolutely ridiculous, but the point of it isn't to actually see Rowling give up her rights, but rather to put the idea out there that she could so maybe people start pressuring her into doing so.
Eventually a few years down the line she might actually give them up, you might get surprised at how good such ideas can get to people when repeated enough times, normies are literal robots.
>you might get surprised at how good such ideas can get to people when repeated enough times, normies are literal robots.
this is why people should blog as much as possible about ideas they want to create in the world.
i have a tomboy gf blog and instagram just for this reason.
I dont think this is happening here. And that this ever worked. For this to work the fans or public has to hate bomb her.
See George Lucas, it only worked when he felt too old to manage it or work with his directors. And he is a business man, he probably felt the wind of change in Hollywood and thought this is the moment to sell it.
Didn't read the article but a recent headline on my feed said "school retracts transgender bathrooms after student walkout" so i assume even dumb, accepting gen Z progressive buttholes know where to begin to draw a line.
Then they would just challenge the meaning of "biological" and warp it to be "more inclusive".
I mean that's all progressive leftism comes down to, turning lies into truths by semantics while telling you that "language changes" or some shit like that. It's prime comedic material.
>Someone who directly enables trans-genocide cannot be allowed to use such a beloved series as a platform for hate
She's not using the series to communicate her thoughts about troons. In fact, she hasn't even really touched the series outside of The Cursed Child and the screenplays she's written for Fantastic Beasts, none of these even allude to troons. Whoever wrote this is genuinely moronic, like all journalists.
no one has gone stochastic on journalists and started rounding them up for fun times(yet).
imagine if rowling actually used her money to set up a bounty for these authors on the dark web. would be kino.
Transgenders are very much like israelites, whereas criticism = genocide >”I can’t whip out my dick in front of little girls in a dressing room? Waaaaaaah! It’s anuduh shoah!”
Why the frick do you homosexuals care so much about clickbait shit anyway? It's shitposting, but for money, that's the whole business plan for those sites
>Yeah it didn’t happen b-but it could!
Holy frick the brain rot
And even in your gay fantasy all that happens is someone writes a stupid vox article? Pathetic
Cinemaphile were the idiots that spread the “Hurr Durr Don’t post links because that gives them gajillion clicks!!!” (nevermind they already got the clicks from others) in the Kotaku days.
Because of them, we now get constant fake articles that anons easily baited into replying because most anons are too dumb to make an archive link.
>someone who engages in wrong think should not hold the rights to a franchise they created
So true, when anyone who makes a beloved story turns out to be a chud it should be handed off to A.I to churn out sequel, prequel, remake, and spin off slop for eternity
The answer is Leftists and the pro-LGBT people should use the education they got from studying at university to write their own book series about magical kids who defeat their enemies with sparkles.
>cannot be allowed to use such a beloved series as a platform for hate
When did that even happen? Did I miss the book where Harry has to use sectumsempra on multiple transgender death eaters to stop them from raping ginny?
Not real. Amanda is written 'Amxnda'. The question is not a question, that shouldn't have got past an editor. The entire premise is too absurd, even for these nutjobs.
Why is there not the same vitriol against Rishi Sunak who was arguably more transphobic at the Tory conference? It’s because these leftist women have a symbiotic relationship and strange attachment with Harry Potter—because they likely had little friends in childhood and used the characters as a substitute—so it’s more egregious in their mind. Despite the fact that Rowling is a leftist on virtually every other issue and immensely charitable they need to go after her. And it’s very strange that they’re trying to destroy the life of one of the few self-made woman billionaires and trying to delegitimise her origins from single mother on benefits to writing the most influential book series of our time. She’s not even against trans woman in a /misc/ way it’s because she’s a raging feminist.
Transexuals are mentally ill and need constant assurance that they're normal which is why the relentlessly seek validation and cultivate victimhood status to get the attention they desperately crave which is why they became trans in the first place.
>vox
>should this person I don't like, and actively berate, capitulate to my unreasonable demands despite having absolutely no reason to do so and motivation to do the contrary?
what the frick kind of moron thinks this way
Vox “contributors”. Nuff said.
I mean it's like why put it in a question when you know the answer is no? It's obviously an opinion piece so why not switch "JK Rowling" and "should" around and drop the fricking question mark instead of being a fricking moron about it?
They phrase it as a question because then the readers think they'll have considered a counter-argument when they make their conclusion.
Except we all know the conclusion from that loaded question.
Dude no, it's not even phrased as a question. Review your second grade grammar textbook if you don't understand why.
>Should JK Rowling forfeit her rights to Harry Potter?
How is this not a question?
Not the one I meant.
The subheading also has a question mark and shouldn't.
It's more that he's trying to say the state should take it from her without actually saying it. And the way things are going they will.
>No sir, there's no time to be blue!
>Change is coming and we're going to need you!
>So pick up your stein and sing a happy song.
>Hitler's heroes are here to right the wrongs!
Where can I watch this? Is it locked away in the Disney vault?
>Should JK Rowling give me a sloppy BJ then sit on my face?
Yes. Yes she should.
(here's why)
While wearing a leather SS uniform, and that's a good thing.
There are a lot of people would who love to own Harry Potter's IP rights, they would milk the shit out of it like Disney did with Star Wars, but they know Rowling is very much attached to it.
So they're trying to move the Overton window, of course that article is absolutely ridiculous, but the point of it isn't to actually see Rowling give up her rights, but rather to put the idea out there that she could so maybe people start pressuring her into doing so.
Eventually a few years down the line she might actually give them up, you might get surprised at how good such ideas can get to people when repeated enough times, normies are literal robots.
>you might get surprised at how good such ideas can get to people when repeated enough times, normies are literal robots.
this is why people should blog as much as possible about ideas they want to create in the world.
i have a tomboy gf blog and instagram just for this reason.
well where is it, anon
i'm not posting it here, you guys poisoned the well on my goth gf insta and tanked the views
I dont think this is happening here. And that this ever worked. For this to work the fans or public has to hate bomb her.
See George Lucas, it only worked when he felt too old to manage it or work with his directors. And he is a business man, he probably felt the wind of change in Hollywood and thought this is the moment to sell it.
>wanting trannies to not rape women in womens prisons or participate in womens sports is "transgenocide"
No one even knows what Rowling said anymore, do they?
Didn't read the article but a recent headline on my feed said "school retracts transgender bathrooms after student walkout" so i assume even dumb, accepting gen Z progressive buttholes know where to begin to draw a line.
Raising a generation saturated in rainbow propaganda has had the opposite intended effect.
Genuinely, I think all she said is that bathrooms, changing rooms, and prisons should go by actual biological sex and not make-believe.
How dare she spout such bigotry!
Then they would just challenge the meaning of "biological" and warp it to be "more inclusive".
I mean that's all progressive leftism comes down to, turning lies into truths by semantics while telling you that "language changes" or some shit like that. It's prime comedic material.
>Amxnda
>Someone who directly enables trans-genocide cannot be allowed to use such a beloved series as a platform for hate
She's not using the series to communicate her thoughts about troons. In fact, she hasn't even really touched the series outside of The Cursed Child and the screenplays she's written for Fantastic Beasts, none of these even allude to troons. Whoever wrote this is genuinely moronic, like all journalists.
I demonstrate that I am moronic by using question marks at the end of sentences that are statements?
I don’t get it?
>by Amxnda Simpson
>she/him
These people are welcoming 1984 with open arms. What the actual frick is wrong with them?
They think that if THEY do it, then THEY get to keep the power and dictate where society goes. They don’t think beyond their nose
probably because its not 1984 but closer to a brave new world
no one has gone stochastic on journalists and started rounding them up for fun times(yet).
imagine if rowling actually used her money to set up a bounty for these authors on the dark web. would be kino.
They’re nothing but tools, you shouldn’t even consider them human
Where is this trans genocide everyone keeps referring, too? I have a feeling no one is trying to systematically eliminate all trans people.
>I have a feeling no one is trying to systematically eliminate all trans people.
Transpeople are systematically eliminating 41% of their own group
So it’s a self “sustaining” genocide they can always fall back on as victims whenever they want?
autocaust
just like the AIDs "victims" from the 90s or the gaypox "victims" from a year ago.
Transgenders are very much like israelites, whereas criticism = genocide
>”I can’t whip out my dick in front of little girls in a dressing room? Waaaaaaah! It’s anuduh shoah!”
>JKR pioneered the 'X IS GAY"-tier inclusivity
reap what you sow, b***h. I'm glad she's getting shit on, the left eats their own.
>she/him
Also written by "Amxnda" it's like a parody. I guess she/him is supposed to mean gender fluid or some other BS.
>like a parody
No it’s very obvious bait and you guys are morons
TERF island
>Amxnda
>she/him
This is fake and gay
Both of those are actually used by trannies though
Remember guys. Screenshots of articles are fake unless/until OP posts an archived link
Why the frick do you homosexuals care so much about clickbait shit anyway? It's shitposting, but for money, that's the whole business plan for those sites
I just care that people are wasting time discussing something that doesn't exist because OP is a shitstirrer and people are moronic
The article may not exist but the concept does
>Yeah it didn’t happen b-but it could!
Holy frick the brain rot
And even in your gay fantasy all that happens is someone writes a stupid vox article? Pathetic
I agree anon. This is exactly why people b***hing about trans genocide are idiots
yes.
And we don't have to be as moronic as that
I blame Cinemaphile.
Cinemaphile were the idiots that spread the “Hurr Durr Don’t post links because that gives them gajillion clicks!!!” (nevermind they already got the clicks from others) in the Kotaku days.
Because of them, we now get constant fake articles that anons easily baited into replying because most anons are too dumb to make an archive link.
ngl i'd frick JK Rowling
She's in her late 50s now, leave her alone.
a bigot is a bigot no matter her bank account
>someone who engages in wrong think should not hold the rights to a franchise they created
So true, when anyone who makes a beloved story turns out to be a chud it should be handed off to A.I to churn out sequel, prequel, remake, and spin off slop for eternity
The answer is Leftists and the pro-LGBT people should use the education they got from studying at university to write their own book series about magical kids who defeat their enemies with sparkles.
>amxnda
>she/him
just put these mutants out of their misery already
Is that real? What kind of a socialist Nazi..
You know what, doesn't matter. All I have to say to this is
>No!
jk rowling looks quite good for an old bid
>she/him
WTF
>Amxnda Simpson
How would you even pronounce that shit.
>cannot be allowed to use such a beloved series as a platform for hate
When did that even happen? Did I miss the book where Harry has to use sectumsempra on multiple transgender death eaters to stop them from raping ginny?
Who the frick thinks like that, writes it out and gets it published on a big platform?
Why is this the world I have to live in?
seems a little fake and gay
why not just post one of the actual articles? they look bad enough
>I'm moronic but you should meet my fricking editor!
Clowns.
>Amxnda
Not real. Amanda is written 'Amxnda'. The question is not a question, that shouldn't have got past an editor. The entire premise is too absurd, even for these nutjobs.
>Person says a woman is a woman
>YOU'RE LITERALLY IN FAVOR OF GENOCIDE
Do lefties really?
Why is there not the same vitriol against Rishi Sunak who was arguably more transphobic at the Tory conference? It’s because these leftist women have a symbiotic relationship and strange attachment with Harry Potter—because they likely had little friends in childhood and used the characters as a substitute—so it’s more egregious in their mind. Despite the fact that Rowling is a leftist on virtually every other issue and immensely charitable they need to go after her. And it’s very strange that they’re trying to destroy the life of one of the few self-made woman billionaires and trying to delegitimise her origins from single mother on benefits to writing the most influential book series of our time. She’s not even against trans woman in a /misc/ way it’s because she’s a raging feminist.
W A S T E D
A
S
T
E
D
You will never be a female super satan
Transexuals are mentally ill and need constant assurance that they're normal which is why the relentlessly seek validation and cultivate victimhood status to get the attention they desperately crave which is why they became trans in the first place.
>Amxnda
>A man duh
Didn't Friends make this joke three decades ago?