What exactly do you think indiana jones is supposed to be? Some Uber dark and gritty meme?
It's based on serials from the 30s and 40s.
You probably think star wars is supposed to be a deathly serious epic too don't you?
and 4 sucks dick, get over it cum slurping homosexual
2 years ago
Anonymous
you only say that because they depict commies as bad guys, troony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that’s one of the only reasons I enjoy it, turd breath, I hate the nazi super villians in 1 and 3
What exactly do you think indiana jones is supposed to be? Some Uber dark and gritty meme?
It's based on serials from the 30s and 40s.
You probably think star wars is supposed to be a deathly serious epic too don't you?
In retrospect it wasn't THAT bad.
The worst parts are that Ford was way too old and the fridge scene.
I dont get why anyone would want to see an action hero like Indie grow old in the movies. I dont even want to know how bad he's gonna look in this one, it's just sad.
Imagine thinking anything produced under Kathleen Kennedy will be good. This is a movie about a straight white guy, this is no way in hell this movie will actually be about Indy and there's no way in hell they will allow him to be a badass. Check your expectations and remember everything Kathleen Kennedy has done to star wars
The only nostalgia bait I'll fall for. It better be good.
We all know exactly how this is going to go.
Indy will be paired with a young, brunette, british female lead. He'll be character-assassinated to be weak, incompetent, and cowardly, and she'll instantly be perfect and better than him at everything.
At the end, he'll be killed off. She'll take his hat and whip, and become an adventurer.
Maybe she'll even call herself "Indiana Joan". Something that Spielberg literally suggested: >INDIANA JOANS Ready Player One director Steven Spielberg says it’s time for a woman to play Indiana Jones >The director says he knows putting a woman in the lead role of an Indiana Jones movie would upset fans, but believes it's time the explorer 'took a different form' >In an exclusive interview, Spielberg nodded when asked if this new-look Jones could be female, and added: “We’d have to change the name from Jones to Joan. And there would be nothing wrong with that.”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/5966069/steven-spielberg-indiana-jones-queen-ready-player-one/
>different form
You mean like Tomb Raider? It's literally the female knockoff of Indiana Jones. Why can't they work on making that good instead of making Indiana Jones shit?
>Why can't they work on making that good instead of making Indiana Jones shit?
Because it's about intentionally destroying the old shit. They hate the original and its fans, so they are trying to replace it.
Yes, this is what will happen. But on the bright side, Kennedy and co. know its a disaster in the making. Even the most ardent sjws know their peak has passed and they're on the way out. Netflix signaled the beginning of the end.
>But on the bright side, Kennedy and co. know its a disaster in the making. Even the most ardent sjws know their peak has passed and they're on the way out. Netflix signaled the beginning of the end.
They really don't. Netflix might be about to go under, but the vast majority of these companies will never "go broke" no matter how woke they get, because they are subsidized for ESG points by multinational corporations and billionaires.
Thats true, but all fads and trends die eventually. Even ESG can't hold off the inevitable decline. Take for example BLM.. no one gives a shit anymore.
It doesn't matter if the vast majority of the public hates it. That's always been the case, most of the audience hates this woke shit. They'll keep doing it anyway. It's not about the money. And ESG and other mechanisms can keep woke companies afloat indefinitely, it's subsidized by the people who own the banks/money-printers and control the global money supply.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>most of the audience hates this woke shit
wrong, most of the audience doesn't even notice it, they don't care, they don't pay enough attention
Maybe she'll even call herself "Indiana Joan". Something that Spielberg literally suggested: >INDIANA JOANS Ready Player One director Steven Spielberg says it’s time for a woman to play Indiana Jones >The director says he knows putting a woman in the lead role of an Indiana Jones movie would upset fans, but believes it's time the explorer 'took a different form' >In an exclusive interview, Spielberg nodded when asked if this new-look Jones could be female, and added: “We’d have to change the name from Jones to Joan. And there would be nothing wrong with that.”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/5966069/steven-spielberg-indiana-jones-queen-ready-player-one/
Fundamentally doesn't work. Indiana Jones only works pre 1960s
She was in charge of the finances. That was the extent of her producing duties. Now she IS the Speilberg/Lucas combo, making all the critical decisions.
I remember a gag in mad magazine from like 15 years ago or so with "Indiana Jones and the search for affordable prescription drugs" and I think "Indiana Jones and the quest for a firmer matress" or something like that.
Harrison Ford was in his 60s then not 80. This is excessive
PROTIP: The people in charge of these IPs are literally incapable of making a good movie for the EXACT same reason Communist shitholes are incapable of producing a flourishing economy. Everyone involved is too busy reading the room to see what the approved political opinion is before they enthusiastically agree with whatever it is.
Even in this darkly-lit silhouette, he looks frail and weak. This is just depressing. Indiana Jones is a fantasy character, and seeing him as an oxygen tank-dragging geriatric who could drop dead any moment is an incredibly depressing destruction of that fantasy.
I can see them interlinking scenes in the past to give the audience some 'prime' indy action and the scenes with 60s indy will be more akin to Henry Sr in Last Crusade. Honestly I'd rather that than trying to pass old Ford off as a man of action. I just don't have any faith that it will be a good movie.
You chuds better not dare criticize it! Because if you do... you're an AGEIST!
That's right, chudcels. Straight from the director's mouth. If you think an 80-year-old man is implausible as an action hero, or think it might be elder abuse when Harrison Ford IRL getting injured by merely rehearsing fight scenes for this movie, you're a BIGOT!
Imagine being so thin-skinned and insecure, that for your high-profile movie that millions will be discussing in the years up until release, you go out of your way to hunt down and police negative comments on Twitter.
950 Million. It'll do well in America but overseas won't care as much.
That's a generous amount, though I agree with the overseas theory.
I'd predict somewhere in the $400m area, and even that seems high as I type it out.
Nostalgia will do wonders and I think the trailer will build up a ton of hype.
Seems like a reasonable presumption.
Shame we'll have to wait a year to find out, though I'm sure it'll pass by a lot faster than we'd like it to.
I think its actually possible for it to bomb unless the trailer is well done
>950 Million box office
>It'll do well in America but overseas won't care as much
>no Lucas
It'll suck
4 had lucas and sucked
>4 sucked
It wasn't as good as the first 3 but it was still a fun indiana Jones movie
This won't be
>still a fun indiana Jones movie
I hate machildren like this
Only manchildren care about the artistic integrity of Indiana Jones
>NOOOOO INDY CANT BE ART THEYRE SUPPOSE TO BE CAMPY NOOOOOOO
shut up, chud
they're literal kid movies, Black person. get over yourself.
and 4 sucks dick, get over it cum slurping homosexual
you only say that because they depict commies as bad guys, troony.
that’s one of the only reasons I enjoy it, turd breath, I hate the nazi super villians in 1 and 3
What exactly do you think indiana jones is supposed to be? Some Uber dark and gritty meme?
It's based on serials from the 30s and 40s.
You probably think star wars is supposed to be a deathly serious epic too don't you?
You're allowed to say that Jurassic Park 3 sucks but it's a fun movie. Indiana Jones 4 doesn't exist.
JP3 is a slog and not fun at all.
>fun indiana Jones movie
That's the problem. It wasn't fun.
But I bet it'll still suck less than whatever Disney is shitting out here.
I didn't hate 4. But honestly the only good one is 2.
>muh pragticail effects
Yeah they were good but whatever. Sand is boring. Jungle is fun.
>honestly the only good one is 2.
Nah. All are fun in their own way and good adventure movies
>honestly the only good one is 2.
Temple of Doom was by far the weakest of the originals
the true patrician choice is Last Crusade
Temple of Doom is the weakest, but its also the most kino which brings back up to par with the other two.
Doom is the best for the simple fact it has no nazi supervillians in it
In retrospect it wasn't THAT bad.
The worst parts are that Ford was way too old and the fridge scene.
I dont get why anyone would want to see an action hero like Indie grow old in the movies. I dont even want to know how bad he's gonna look in this one, it's just sad.
There's some goofy shit like the fridge scene but overall it was okay
Zoomer apologists are a cancer. This may shatter your entire worldview, but some of the movies you grew up with really were bad.
Rewatched it last year for the first time since it came out in theaters, it really is a crappy movie.
This time Ford wouldn't even bother being on the poster.
Imagine thinking anything produced under Kathleen Kennedy will be good. This is a movie about a straight white guy, this is no way in hell this movie will actually be about Indy and there's no way in hell they will allow him to be a badass. Check your expectations and remember everything Kathleen Kennedy has done to star wars
Even if they make Indy 'cool' he won't be watchable anyway. It's 80s yo Ford, he's a grump and his looks won't carry that.
>Imagine thinking anything produced under Kathleen Kennedy will be good.
Jurassic Park?
We all know exactly how this is going to go.
Indy will be paired with a young, brunette, british female lead. He'll be character-assassinated to be weak, incompetent, and cowardly, and she'll instantly be perfect and better than him at everything.
At the end, he'll be killed off. She'll take his hat and whip, and become an adventurer.
Who's that other man sitting beside him?
Kek. She's actually said how she's insecure about having small breasts (incorporated that into Fleabag).
Maybe she'll even call herself "Indiana Joan". Something that Spielberg literally suggested:
>INDIANA JOANS Ready Player One director Steven Spielberg says it’s time for a woman to play Indiana Jones
>The director says he knows putting a woman in the lead role of an Indiana Jones movie would upset fans, but believes it's time the explorer 'took a different form'
>In an exclusive interview, Spielberg nodded when asked if this new-look Jones could be female, and added: “We’d have to change the name from Jones to Joan. And there would be nothing wrong with that.”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/5966069/steven-spielberg-indiana-jones-queen-ready-player-one/
why would you read any of that? why would that be relevant in your lifetime?
>different form
You mean like Tomb Raider? It's literally the female knockoff of Indiana Jones. Why can't they work on making that good instead of making Indiana Jones shit?
>Why can't they work on making that good instead of making Indiana Jones shit?
Because it's about intentionally destroying the old shit. They hate the original and its fans, so they are trying to replace it.
Yes, this is what will happen. But on the bright side, Kennedy and co. know its a disaster in the making. Even the most ardent sjws know their peak has passed and they're on the way out. Netflix signaled the beginning of the end.
>But on the bright side, Kennedy and co. know its a disaster in the making. Even the most ardent sjws know their peak has passed and they're on the way out. Netflix signaled the beginning of the end.
They really don't. Netflix might be about to go under, but the vast majority of these companies will never "go broke" no matter how woke they get, because they are subsidized for ESG points by multinational corporations and billionaires.
Thats true, but all fads and trends die eventually. Even ESG can't hold off the inevitable decline. Take for example BLM.. no one gives a shit anymore.
It doesn't matter if the vast majority of the public hates it. That's always been the case, most of the audience hates this woke shit. They'll keep doing it anyway. It's not about the money. And ESG and other mechanisms can keep woke companies afloat indefinitely, it's subsidized by the people who own the banks/money-printers and control the global money supply.
>most of the audience hates this woke shit
wrong, most of the audience doesn't even notice it, they don't care, they don't pay enough attention
there is no audience anymore lol
netflix is the first to find out
Fundamentally doesn't work. Indiana Jones only works pre 1960s
>young, israeli*, brunette woman
Were Daisy Ridley, Felicity Jones, or Emilia Clarke israeli? Doesn't seem to be a specific fetish of Kathleen's, unlike the other characteristics.
You frickin dingus she produced the Indiana Jones movies
the only thing she "produced" was some weapons grade blackmail on lucas and/or spielberg
Yes she was Spielberg's blowjob producer
She was in charge of the finances. That was the extent of her producing duties. Now she IS the Speilberg/Lucas combo, making all the critical decisions.
also fondling lucasballs while having a hidden camera running
>lucasballs
Ooh! Icky icky goo!
Some film shots leaked showing Roman soldiers leaving a bireme
Hopefully it's just a soulless "flashbacks of ancients fighting over the artifacts" scene that is in every adventure movie now
Pic related.
The name alone will make money. It will suck, but nobody knows that until after they've paid to see it.
1 billion. Cinemaphile will seethe and cope and say it’ll flop, but it will do well.
But does that mean the movie won't suck? I doubt it.
>mikkelsen is on it
>probably the villain
Indiana Jones Kino is back on the menu bros.
about treefiddy
Do you think they’ll continue with the sci fi direction or go back to magic? God I hope it’s not scifi shit
is it true he dies?
b***h he's dying of old age
What is he searching for? Did somebody steal his social security check?
I remember a gag in mad magazine from like 15 years ago or so with "Indiana Jones and the search for affordable prescription drugs" and I think "Indiana Jones and the quest for a firmer matress" or something like that.
Harrison Ford was in his 60s then not 80. This is excessive
"Excessive" is an extremely delicate way of putting it.
No idea. Who cares really. I say success either way because yidsney fudges the numbers
>Disney + release
It will break tons of oddly specific records without disclosing exact amounts of money
Around 0,3 morbillion.
Indiana Jones doesn't wear jeans
>Cate Blanchett
Fricking why and how?
700mil
Doubt it'll hit a bill domestically but it'll be up there. Eurogays and chinks won't care as much which is fine. Will probably do alright in India
INDIANA JONES AND WERTHER'S LOST RECIPE
INDIANA JONES AND THE CANE OF DESTINY
INDIANA JONES AND THE OPENING OF THE PDF
>comes out a week after Flash
Which will do better?
Nobody cares.
PROTIP: The people in charge of these IPs are literally incapable of making a good movie for the EXACT same reason Communist shitholes are incapable of producing a flourishing economy. Everyone involved is too busy reading the room to see what the approved political opinion is before they enthusiastically agree with whatever it is.
So what you're saying is fascism is the only correct political ideology?
Yeah, all those great movies, music, and art made by the Nazis… oh wait there weren’t any kek
I can't imagine reading this and thinking it will be anything but a soulless disaster.
>no Lucas
>Spielberg only being a producer
>8,000 rewrites
It's over
>Shia LaBeouf's character was named Mutt Williams
I never knew this
Very likely just Henry III
His other names that they considered were "Fido", "Pluto", and "Sir Lickshisballsalot".
My God. Hollywood just won't stop.
Disney Marketing behind it so surely $700 million minimum
>first look photo
Are they gonna de-age him?
Will they mention mutt since he's not gonna be in the movie or completely ignore him and marrion?
This movie sure seems confident
Even in this darkly-lit silhouette, he looks frail and weak. This is just depressing. Indiana Jones is a fantasy character, and seeing him as an oxygen tank-dragging geriatric who could drop dead any moment is an incredibly depressing destruction of that fantasy.
>Are they gonna de-age him?
We have pics of him with black dots on his face, so yes.
I can see them interlinking scenes in the past to give the audience some 'prime' indy action and the scenes with 60s indy will be more akin to Henry Sr in Last Crusade. Honestly I'd rather that than trying to pass old Ford off as a man of action. I just don't have any faith that it will be a good movie.
They should just cast that austrian Ford lookalike for young Indy they passed on with Han Solo
They don't need a lookalike since theyll just mspaint ford's face onto a stuntman's body.
I mean they should do something with dignity and opportunity
I actually fell for it bros...am I moronic?
Will make Avatar 2 look like Big Momma's House 2.
You chuds better not dare criticize it! Because if you do... you're an AGEIST!
That's right, chudcels. Straight from the director's mouth. If you think an 80-year-old man is implausible as an action hero, or think it might be elder abuse when Harrison Ford IRL getting injured by merely rehearsing fight scenes for this movie, you're a BIGOT!
Uhhh, you bigot? George Lucas said age is not a problem and Harrison can still easily play Indy.
>2008 was 14 years ago
Anon i...
Imagine being so thin-skinned and insecure, that for your high-profile movie that millions will be discussing in the years up until release, you go out of your way to hunt down and police negative comments on Twitter.
It's like if Movieblob was directing the movie.
>VINYL BRICKS
Lmao this homosexual is shaming them for not having real genuine artisianal exposed brick.
What a gay. The studio is probably taking most of the legwork/oxygen anyway, I think that's why he's so insecure
400 mill
I never even watched 4. Good luck getting me to watch 5.
The only nostalgia bait I'll fall for. It better be good.
Best I can do is slightly worse than Crystal Skull.
>Disney+
>box office
More like box orifice because they'll shove it up their ass and not let anyone see.
It will do the numbers of a lesser Marvel flick.
6 gorillion,
Anon why are you laughing it's just a number?
I like how they're doing everything they can not to show his face in the posters
Old Harrison Ford just reminds everyone else that they're old and the good times are long past.
That's not an official poster, anon.
Can't wait for them to cast a bald gap toothed black woman to totally subvert our expectations and watch her become the new Indiana Jones.
god this looks bad
OP you are such a fricking piece of garbage for making me have to look this up
yes, its indiana jones in the yukon gold fields
is hollywood just completely populated by morons now?
wtf why do they show old footage from 4? Is that suppose to get us excited??? This is gonna bomb
because its fan made and OP is actually and unsurprisingly a homosexual for posting a screenshot for it
Yeah crazy guys, for me it's the continuity from Mad's character in Casino Royale, not sure that will go well with the critics
I like how they didn't show off the sjw who will take over as protagonist 10 minutes into the movie
bait the audience in first, then pull the ol switcheroo
At this point I can't tell if you guys are baiting or 100% moronic.
teenagers that never saw 4
>predicted flop
>so Disney decides to go with a Disney+ mini-series
>flops there too
>racism, white supremacy, homophobia, etc. are all to blame
>Indiana Jane
This is going to be an absolute dumpster fire, can’t wait for the seething