Predict the RT Score. Also, Press screenings have started.
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Predict the RT Score. Also, Press screenings have started.
Predict the RT Score. Also, Press screenings have started.
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
|
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>le bomb,,, le boomba?
why are you asian?
it's some RT critic, not me.
Absolute intelligence of the average Cinemaphile poster. OP literally mentioned press screening, and the filename is from Twitter.
>Sirs, the fire rises!
Oppenheimer 4D will literally detonate a live atomic bomb in the theatre
95%. It'll be Nolan's highest-rated film.
There’s a long sex scene and random volume bursts. Definitely rushed but still alright. There’s a part that tries hard to be the nuke episode of NuTwinPeaks. 7/9 got a light? 85%
>Einstein and Oppenheimer roll by on choppers
>Born to be Wild plays
100% Critic Score
100% Audience Score
We’re so back Nolanbros…
75%, not kino.
>mfw it's a box office bomb
67%
60% RT. Nolan's audio mixes have been getting progressively worse. Tenet would've received higher ratings if it didn't give the audience tinnitus.... now Nolan is going to make an entire movie about huge explosions? People will be leaving the theater deaf. When Oppenheimer says his famous line "I am become death" it will be indiscernible because there will be bombs going off during every line of dialogue. Nolan will of course deny his shit audio mixing and say that the audience needs to buy better speakers.
>bombs going off every line of dialogue
Is Nolan turning into Michael Bay?
pretty funny how quiet and normal Following's audio mixing was in comparison
Critic score: 90+%
Audience score: almost 100%
Oppaiheimer and the atomic booba
95 RT critic (average 8.5/10)
92 RT audience
84 metacritic
Remember this
switch audience and critic scores, and then you can BOOK IT
Metacritic seems right.
This is what is happening to nearly every Hollywood blockbuster.
It shows how rigged the numbers are.
ok
86% critics
77% audience
Its a israeli prestige project. Despite its mediocrity, despite it being disposable pap, it will be hailed as one of the best. Oscars all around!
No Oscars, at all with Barbie around
Maybe some technical shit no one cares
89% critic
90% audience
It will be overrated
First review has dropped
sounds like Tenet, bravo Nolan
This is just ChatGPT. You can tell because it's vague about everything
This is AI. It reads like someone who had to turn in a book report but didn't read the book
>NOOOOOOO ITS TOO SLOW WHERES MY PEW PEWS AND MY SUPERHEROES FLYING AND CHRIS PRATT LOOKING INTO THE CAMERA AND SAYING “NOW THIS IS PODRACING” BEFORE PUNCHING THANOS IN THE INFINITY STONES 0/5 STARSSSSSSSS
I know people who are unironically just like that. They claim they hate "talking films"
>They claim they hate "talking films"
is it the 1930s again?
are you just moronic or something or have never used chatgpt? it's an ai generated review. no reviews are p because the first screenings literally havent finished
cope
you can literally google reviews lol
find me the link to this one
checkmate
I KNEEL WHITE SAMA! I KNEEL
Literally every normalgay who sees this movie will be like this tho
honestly, it probably is pretty fricking boring. Nolan seems like too much a midwit to realize what gives the great cinematic films that emotional weight to make people care. In his mind it's probably "well I guess, it's just people talking". Interstellar proved he's inept in writing drama.
some critics say it's just flown by it's fast-paced.
a 3 hour nolan film of just dialogue sounds fricking horrendous
Go back normoid
>three hours of plane scene tier memery
>fricking horrendous
pick one. By the time the movie’s out you’ll have roicism man wishing he only got the Bill Wilson treatment
>The performances in "Oppenheimer" are commendable, particularly from the LEAD ACTOR who embodies Oppenheimer's internal struggles and conflicting emotion.
LMAO Can ChatGPT not fricking Google the cast, at least?
Ah, so it's gonna be Nolan showing off again by setting the whole film out of chronological order. Bravo, truly only an ebin genius would do this and only a hack does things in chronological order. Peter Weir is definitely hack of the historical drama genre for having done his movies not out of synch.
This is either written by an AI or a midwit, who discovered a dictionary for once.
>historical portrait
>extreme care to details and characters
>this is le bad
Rotten Tomatoes is a corporate shill site, has been for nearly 10 years, studios generously bought out the original web master, and manage it with straws and shell companies.
it's going to mogg barbie sadly
85 critics, 90 audience
97% critic based on the 600lbs film alone
Will struggle to get above 60% audience score
>Shooting was…LE HARD?
>single takes
>shot in sequential
Based Nolan. Like all the fight scenes in his movies where characters just fall over or slips but it's good enough.
EWW DADDY SHOW ME YOUR JUICER BABY CAN'T WAIT
>juicer
What zoomer lingo is this?
>Oppi juicer
Probably they means Oppenheimer pee pee
57 days is pretty fast, a movie crew films maybe two to three minutes per day, the movie is three hours long, some scenes were probably cut, and they probably didn't work all weekends. So yeah it's pretty fast.
it's not an action movie with stunts or complex choreographies
even if they have lots of pages and setups,
it sounds normal
>Predict Bombenheimer RT score
Critic Score: 3.6 rontgen
Audience Score: 15.000 rontgen
It better be good I’m taking my dad to see it but it seems kino
people are gonna pretend this movie is good for years before admitting it's average, like they did with Tenet
75%
How are you supposed to make a movie about scientists compelling?
92% RT score. Average rating 8.9/10.
Film wins between 8-10 Oscars. Nolan wins Best Director.
He doesnt load his movies with lgbt and Black folk (or both) so i doubt they will ever give him an oscar.
That is true. Though maybe he can get a Director win even if they go with something more woke for BP. Which is bullshit (ASSUMING it's as good as people are saying). But that's the age we live in now. It's disgusting.
I hate all the marketing material for this movie. Seeing some sickly looking c**t stare into the camera doesn't make me want to watch this.
>I hate all the marketing material
not much to hate though right. nolan really didn't give a single digit frick about marketing